Iwadi ntesiwaju lori nkan marun ti Muhammadu gbe ile aye se si ile yoruba

Iwadi n lori Muhammadu

[@kazeemajala]

Great job

[@BahounwolaIssaolagoke]

❤❤❤

[@kazeemajala]

Baby tisheju

[@Dr.Oduwole]

Can you imagine we are spending billions to Hajj yet Yoruba is not yet on The new AI (artificial intelligence)

[@OladeleOlabode-q2o]

Ona ti pin o, ko ye eru allah mo o

[@binaryworlddhopeengine451]

Kaaba ojubo osha al-lah. Muhammadu dobodobo opuro.

[@mercyjoy5409]

anobi ji pata pupa number one yahoo guy, all the atrocities full his hand

[@lekanakinbohun2277]

Islam brought nothing good to Yorùbáland than lies and unnecessary hyping of somebody that his wisdom can't stand that of Orunmila bara mi Agboniregun, the time to have debate like this is now, debunking their lies is as important as reducing their influence

[@mikepiget698]

Mohammad The Red Velvet Smooth Criminal? Rules For Thee But Not For Me. Mohammad had the audacity to hand out brutal punishments for theft like cutting hands while he himself was going around looting caravans with impunity. There was no authority higher than him who could subject him to the punishments he was handing out to other people. Mohammad had no qualms about punishing his minions who had stolen from his stash of already stolen goods. He took this to extremes in cases where even somebody dying in the cause of Islam couldn't temper his grudge against the person having once stolen something from his stash. He would condemn them to be burned in hell with the item that they stole and refuted claims by others that the person's death in the cause of Islam would lead them to paradise. Very few muslims know that Mohammad himself was suspected of theft when he took an item from the stash of stolen goods without it being publicly divided first as was customary. This was a petty move as Mohammad would get a gigantic share of 20% in any case. Mohammad as usual used Allah to clear his name and threaten any accusers in to submission. Koran 3:161: It is not [attributable] to any prophet that he would act unfaithfully [in regard to war booty]. And whoever betrays, [taking unlawfully], will come with what he took on the Day of Resurrection. Then will every soul be [fully] compensated for what it earned, and they will not be wronged. A muslim reader might just read past this verse without having any idea as to what this verse might be talking about. Let's get some more details from a tafsir which will show how Koranists can miss out on so much if they insist on following ONLY the Koran: 3.161 Jalal - Al-Jalalayn When some red velvet cloth went missing on the Day of Badr and some people began to say, ‘Perhaps the Prophet took it’, the following was revealed: It is not for a prophet to be fraudulent (an yaghulla, a variant reading has the passive an yughalla, meaning to attribute ghulūl, ‘fraud’, to him), to be treacherous with regard to the spoils, so do not presume this of him; whoever defrauds shall bring what he has defrauded on the Day of Resurrection, carrying it around his neck; then every soul, the fraudulent and the otherwise, shall be paid in full, the requital of, what it has earned, [what] it has done, and they shall not be wronged, a single thing. -------------------------- Mohammad as a caravan looter acts all holier than thou and get's Allah to say: "It is not for a prophet to be fraudulent (an yaghulla, a variant reading has the passive an yughalla, meaning to attribute ghulūl, ‘fraud’, to him), to be treacherous with regard to the spoils, so do not presume this of him." Why would we not presume this of a man that is already engaged in theft? It would make perfect sense that a man who sees nothing wrong in looting honest traders traveling in a caravan to then not be able to help himself but to take something he likes before anyone gets their hands on it. Knowing full well that he has Allah to exonerate him in all cases. Mohammad at Badr was just beginning to rise in power. His followers had joined in with him to share in the loot and didn't have the deference yet to not accuse him of something if they suspected it. Can we be sure that he really did steal the red velvet cloth? No we can't be 100% certain but he decided to exonerate himself via the Koran and we know he has done this in other places where he was guilty. He absolved himself of the oath to not have sex with his wife's slave girl after being caught red handed by his wife Hafsa in Koran 66:1-5 and then threatened his wives with divorce for being upset about the matter in a supposedly ETERNAL book. So there is precedence in the Koran for him using Allah to exonerate himself. Can we look for some clues that might hint at him actually having taken that red velvet cloth? Does this cloth ever turn up again somewhere in the possession of Mohammad? Let's take a look at this hadith: Hadith: Ibn Abbas narrated: "A red velvet cloth was placed in the grave of the Prophet." Grade: Sahih Reference : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1048 sunnah.com/tirmidhi:1048 ------------------------------------ Well, well, well, well, well, what do we have here. Seems like Mohammad had formed quite an attachment to this luxurious piece of red velvet cloth to the extent that he was buried with it. Malignant narcissists love pulling one over other folks so secretly Mohammad might have cherished this little memento from Badr and over time his minions would have forgotten about this issue. We still can't be 100% sure that it was the same red velvet cloth but it goes a long way in making Mohammad look as guilty as sin. Instead of all barbaric punishments like chopping off hands for theft, that never apply to the cult leader himself, society needs to work on people not wanting to commit crime in the first place. We need to build upon the innate empathy in children to teach them how they can play their part in society so that the collective can lead life in a peaceful and harmonious fashion. This will develop a sense within them to not want to steal in the first place rather than wanting to steal and then only being deterred by brutal punishments. Muslims are so conditioned by fear of brutal punishments on earth and in the afterlife that they think that without the threat of hell everybody would go around stealing and killing. They can't fathom a situation like the following in Japan where the social stigma around stealing can help them do the right thing without there being any fear of hell:

[@abiodunolawoyin9774]

Islam mu ipaniyan wa,o tun mu iba lopo omode wa o mu ife,sugar mummy wa,o tunmu ijinigbe wa,omu ibalopo ako si ako wa,o mu boko Haram gbile si.

[@racheldavis2554]

❤❤❤