Jacob Prasch - The Tri-Unity of the Godhead

[@gloriajleese8353]

BRILLIANT Bible Teacher by the Grace of the LORD GOD of Israel!!!

[@Unworthyservant7]

Amen, Glory to our Lord for Jacob Prasch.

[@pkranchtorreon]

what is the graphic that he spoke of...a sine wave?

[@Mr05Chuck]

Stay in front of the microphone please. Could not listen to all the way.

[@approvedofGod]

Prasch is wrong in saying that Tertullian was the first to teach on the Trinity. The first person to teach or introduce the Trinity was Theophilus of Antioch, 180 A.D. His teachings can be traced back to Philo of Alexandria. Philo was neither a Christian or a true Jewish follower of the God of Abraham. He was a Jewish Greek philosopher who was known as the "second Plato."

[@janitor4jesus944]

He didn't say the teaching of The Trinity. He said the word Trinity was introduced by tertullian.

[@approvedofGod]

@@janitor4jesus944 Yes, and he is wrong.

[@approvedofGod]

I do not believe that using the Kabbalah or mystic occultic writings is the way to prove the Trinity doctrine. Unless Jacob Prasch is a mystic or follower of the Kabbalah would I understand his point of view. The Jewish belief that Jabob is expounding is not and never was the view of all Jews. The true Jewish people have never accepted a plurality of persons in God. Modern Jews such as Prasch and Dr. Michael Brown have.

[@greglance4335]

Jacob has some good teaching, but unfortunately he is incorrect on the Trinity. The trick of the Trinity is they have double definitions for the word God. They use the word God as a noun and an adjective, but never tell you they are doing this. Most Trinitrians probably don't know this themselves and this trick is what causes them to be deceived in this area. The noun are the 3 persons each are God and the adjective God is the ousia/divine nature/being (godness). Having two definitions of the word God enables them to equivocate. Utimately the ousia/divine nature becomes a person, "there is no God besides me" This God cannot be the Father, Son or Holy Spirit - it can only be the ousia/divine nature, so the ousia has become a person. You cannot confuse or conflate person and being/ousia in the doctrine of the Trinity, but that is exactly what happens. There are other Scriptues that they do this with "I stretched out the heavens alone." Who is this? It can only be the ousia - it cannot be the Father alone or the Son alone or the Holy Spirit alone. It has to be the ousia, thus again they are forced to make the ousia/divine nature into a person. Once you see this the Trinity falls apart. Please study into this.

[@Reliinfos1]

Christology does not cut it because it is mere in-reading, you can see-in Jesus in the old testament all you want, but it is not really biblical and not according the Divine Truth, only human assumption and interpretation.

[@Reliinfos1]

All humans descriptions of YHWH are limitation by human perception whether it is sole oneness, duality, tri-unity, trinity or eternal family theory. YHWH is ONE and manifests in various biblical manifestations.

[@albusai]

Jesús said before Abraham Yahwe The i am . Same voice of The burning bush

[@Reliinfos1]

YHM was the Word and is before Abraham. The Malach YHWH appeared to Moses. Yah transcends in the Malach YHWH. Elohe YHWH cannot be seen by human vision, only His manifestations are visible.

[@albusai]

He was The one walking on The garden when Adam and eve were hiding from him . All That nomenclature i dont understand

[@Reliinfos1]

If YHWH is all present, the perception of his manifest presence in one form or another is just for us humans. Adam and Eve noticed a concentrated presence when communicating with YHWH. problem is that we apply human circumstances to understand the divine.

[@albusai]

Jehovah is not his name.. Is YHWH ... your lamp has no oil

[@albusai]

SDA say that jesus is the archangel michael ,, but that he is God also

[@Reliinfos1]

Yehoshua Ha Mashiach was not a creation, ALL angels are (except Malach YHWH), so SDA and Jehovah's witnesses are wrong about YHM being a creation. Yeshua was the creation (0-33) but YHM IS YHWH manifestation. LDS is also wrong that the Divine evolved from the natural human state. YHM WAS the Word, became Yeshua and is NOW Cohen YHWH and will be Melech YHWH. Michael is the Archangel of the Angels and is not the Sar Shevaot either.

[@FernandoDornelles4321]

can't you talk english man?

[@greglance4335]

Please study the doctrine of the Trinity and compare it to the Bible. The problem is the "ousia" becomes a "person" which they say you cannot confuse or conflate person and ousia, which is exactly what happens. Moses only knew God as one person - Ask yourself - is there any other God other than Jesus' God? No. There is only one God. Jesus' God is the Father. The Father is the only true God John 17:3 & 1st Corth 8:6. You need to study this objectively.

[@paulsingleton6155]

Ousia?

[@Reliinfos1]

The human mixing (based on Jewish traditions) of Malach YHWH with YHM is not biblical (nor is the human mixture of the quranical interpretation of angel Jibreel with H.S.). Yah transcends in Malach YHWH, notice that He is not worshiped because all Angels are creation (after the Malach YHWH) The rabbi's only connect all the manifestations to the mettatron but it mixes the Divine with creations.