Outtake of the bonus material from the documentary "Derrida"
Пікірлер: 31
@xyz-tl3qs7 жыл бұрын
this video shows how deeply he is influenced by Levinas, the trace, the violence of language (the said) and so on, are themes of Levinas's philosophy
@theory_underground Жыл бұрын
exactly what I was thinking!
@hickoryhippie4 ай бұрын
He isn't answering the question of "Being" but rather explaining how he would approach the question. This is exactly what I needed. It's so simple, but our brains go for the most complex way to address our existential angst and get lost in the thought. Thank you, Mr. Derrida.
@Lovesock69able10 жыл бұрын
"Blame everything on Plato and the rest of get away with the whole she-bang." (No doubt)
@user-vv4lo5yz3h3 жыл бұрын
Thinker way ahead of his time 🙏
@meanwhilemania11 жыл бұрын
This is excellent. I love the way Derrida thinks. He has the unique ability to really get at that essential thing. The great thing is: it is accessible to anybody.
@WolfAndLamb33 жыл бұрын
Quite the contrary -- His whole point is that we can never get at "the essential thing;" it is accessible to no-one.
@vvviiixxx87455 ай бұрын
not sure whether to differ, or to defer. (with regard to the above comments)
@garvisdead4 ай бұрын
baba Derrida! thoda tham jaao 🥲
@jakecarlo99503 жыл бұрын
Fuck yeah, that's awesome, thanks (a dozen years later... yow). That's an outtake? Jesus, that's the most I've ever felt like I understood what my man is up to. Thanks again to the past you that is something other than the modified present you. ;)
@ahfei6847Ай бұрын
Il remplace le dieu de Saint-Augustin par autrui
@Lovesock69able10 жыл бұрын
"So then, his ideas are correct as pre-conception, but untrue as examined, conceived of, or iterated by voice." (Irony)
@TheGuiltsOfUs2 жыл бұрын
POWERFUL
@Lovesock69able10 жыл бұрын
"Why? Your ideas, dear Sir." (Irony)
@Lovesock69able10 жыл бұрын
"Who's ideas?" (Plato)
@Xavyer132 жыл бұрын
L'effect
@edcify8241 Жыл бұрын
c'est moi
@AlexanderVerney-Elliott-ep7dw2 жыл бұрын
Derrida has no ontological understanding of Being becuase Derrida is without Dasein as we witness 'here' with Derrida not being 'there'. Derrida has no presence of the present unable to be present unable to come to presence: Being is not 'interpreted' as Presence: Being is Presenve.
@mr.tamimi88542 жыл бұрын
Poor Derrida, he must've been an overthinker who can't sleep, sometimes it's more efficient to understand and see the truth when you just believe without questioning too much. Reality is of a major question itself rather than the existence or being, the best thing to do is just to be a believer.
@edcify8241 Жыл бұрын
?
@theory_underground Жыл бұрын
You're the one we feel sorry for... so scared of thinking you're worried you would lose sleep 😅
@georgholden37356 жыл бұрын
every video i watch of derrida he has nothing intresting or original to say.
@philosphorus2 жыл бұрын
That's because you don't get it.
@philosphorus2 жыл бұрын
@Grimoire I know very little French, but from what I think you said... You have to understand what he is trying to explain... It is very hard to do by trying to add it all up together.
@philosphorus2 жыл бұрын
@Grimoire I think the point is thought itself.
@philosphorus2 жыл бұрын
@Grimoire I think so. His whole point is really in understanding just how different something can be if framed/phrased in a certain way. It makes perfect sense to me, but it is difficult to put into words, which is why so many hate Derrida lmao
@spritualelitist6652 жыл бұрын
You can only understand Derrida if you understand and grasp Hieddeger. You can only truly understand Deleuze or Baudrillard if you understand Nietzche. Also Marshall Mcluhan in some ways.
@jipangoo Жыл бұрын
This sums up the whole Derrida thing. Read The question concerning technology and there you have Derrida.