James Webb Telescope Saw First Object Beyond the Dark Ages But What it Found Stunned EveryOne...

[@jklep523]

Webb teaches us once again that what is needed, always, when it comes to science, is humility. Aristotle, Copernicus, Newton, Einstein, were all brilliant iconoclasts of enlightenment, but those insights we can see were but steps along the path. It is the nature of the human gestalt to want to believe we have found the final answers, when in truth we are merely watching shadows dancing on the back walls of Plato’s cave.

[@CarlAyers-x8h]

Scratchings on a rock saying joe was here.

[@JW-hf9ev]

And I might add trapped in this dimension until death allows us to step through the cusps. My faith will point my way in the end .

[@chris5706]

Fascinating. We are only limited by the scope of our imagination and the distance we can see.

[@jean-lucpicard4467]

Indeed Mr. Spock.

[@JeroenvanGutsem-u7e]

It's time for the Giant Magellan Telescope that will surpass JWST 4 times in resolution, this will allow to ressolve individual stars in hyperdistant galaxies and study continents on exoplanets in our own galaxie.

[@KorAllRBare]

@@jean-lucpicard4467 🤣😂😅 Indeed I aired on the same jocularity that he be Spock

[@TheDonosul]

I am not a lettered cosmologist but I have always had a problem with the notion of the universe having a start, because it led to the inevitable question : “What existed before?” The idea that something has always existed seems to make sense to my limited understanding

[@nigelcadiz8635]

Same here. I don't know why some find "infinity" so hard to accept. It makes so much more sense to me than the alternative. But each to their own 😎

[@alankott3129]

To my mind, existence implies physics. If the onset of the universe created physical properties including time, then there would be no 'before'.

[@CCmagee3]

Both thoughts are equally crazy to me. How can something just exist and how could something that doesn't exist just explode into existence. My mind is just blown. We will never know.

[@JDSJayDS]

If it makes you feel better, the Buddha was asked about the beginning and end of the universe. He replied, "Knowing the answer will not lead the the end of suffering." Knowing the beginning and end is not the key to escaping it.

[@RalphFreeman-ok5of]

Does it really matter how the universe began. Wouldn't all this money and brain power be put to better use .....like discovering how we can live on planet earth without trashing it ?

[@2nostromo]

we already need a bigger telescope

[@kevinim300]

will one ever be big enough...

[@JACKnJESUS]

We do not see things as they are, we see them as we are. A paradox that we can never overcome.

[@1a2b3c4d5]

Exactly!!! A fundamental conclusion. Although, maybe, eventually it could be overcome with AI, but there again the same problem.

[@KorAllRBare]

Truth is absolute and it is 100% free from contradiction. The established laws of physics have evolved from elimination of contradiction in order it complies to truth, These laws have provided the very nature of our technology and reality, and I do stress our reality. Our logic based upon this very fact provides us a powerful tool where we can refer to everything via quantification Eg: 100% = EVERYTHING AKA the Universe, this quanta allows us to theorise whether our theory complies to actual reality. The above quanta is our check sum, and for a two or more physical dimensional model, we can define Mass and Energy and the speed of light, as per the familiar simplified equation E=Mc2, and with three dimensions or more other physical realities, but most importantly we have the ability to actually right now rely on a TOE if it were not for the flawed model of particles separated by a void rather than treating the entire Universe as a singular basic constituent being either Mass, Energy or a ratio of those two basic definitions no matter where or when seeing the universe exists rather than stagnate..

[@jean-lucpicard4467]

@@KorAllRBare You certainly have a point.

[@sutanugupta2836]

Yes, this ought to be accepted and lived with.

[@StimParavane]

Learn to transcend the self using Buddhist meditation.

[@tommynord6407]

Honestly, i've been waiting for decades to hear the conclusions in the end of this video. Also, i find it very hard to believe that there should be only one universe, but rather that "our" universe is one in an incomprehensible amount of universes, many of them nestled.

[@1a2b3c4d5]

According to the definition there is only one universe. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe

[@Debbie-henri]

Considering how many fractal patterns there are in Nature, I wouldn't be surprised if this was the template for Universes too, each one budding off from a larger one. This images seen by Webb could be galaxies that exist in the parent Universe.

[@KorAllRBare]

The Universe IS EVERYTHING, A closed and isolated system where nothing is omitted. Now if you are indeed referring to everything AKA "The Universe" then you can't refer to else, As per the following bad contradictory logical example, QUOTE Here we have everything AKA "The Universe" but let's contradict and assert elsewhere we have a Parrell of it AKA Parallel Universes or just as bad have another everything AKA Multiverses. END QUOTE I hope this flawed logic is understood and seen for what it is, if not your logic may have been corrupted by a religious influence where contradiction is quite acceptable and in fact contradictions are to be treated as factual rather than fictitious due to childhood religious indoctrination..

[@JDSJayDS]

@@KorAllRBare I like beets.

[@craigmitchell905]

every era of science does three things, it confirms things we think we know, it shows us things we were wrong about and it brings up new questions. I think these scientist should use the word Theory more often.

[@ziggydemon1455]

Scientists do, youtubers don't.

[@baptisteweed7929]

Maybe the big bang did not create the universe, but happened in a universe.

[@charlessterling8375]

Without a doubt, the big bang was a recycling event not a creation event.

[@JohanLofgren-jc4mh]

Yes, I even think that every black hole is an universe beginning. It somehow would be wonderful. Why not?

[@CCmagee3]

@@JohanLofgren-jc4mh 💯

[@brendonmckee4334]

agree. My take is a Black holes accumulate energy, where the (energy) inside accumulate to a point where a new universe (big bang) begins.

[@CCmagee3]

@brendonmckee4334 Great thought

[@stevewells8152]

As a simple laymen, I’ve never really understood the tubular graphic showing the path back to the Big Bang. If the was a big bang surely the remnants would have gone in every direction so the elements you are now finding are on the other side of the origin of the bang.

[@brendonmckee4334]

Just a slice of the whole pie i think.

[@frankshailes3205]

That would be before time and space existed, so there is no "other side" before space-time.

[@dyslexictroll8708]

The bear climbed over the mountain. The bear climbed over the mountain. The bear climbed over the mountain, to see what it could see. It saw another mountain. It saw another mountain. It saw another mountain was all that it could see.

[@alankott3129]

Until the bear sees a mountain different enough that the bear calls it something else, thus pausing the maddening repetition.

[@andersen3948]

there is no beginning the universe is infinite in every way both in size and age to believe that there is a beginning is crazy and what is even more crazy is that researchers really believe in that beginning

[@valentinmalinov8424]

This is a philosophical question. I also supporting the vision that the Universe is endless and its beginning is beyond our capacity to understand. But... every physical structure must be constructed in some point in the past. How far back we can only speculating. - Trillions? or much more. Eternal can be only non-physical elements or Entity!

[@JohanLofgren-jc4mh]

A hundred years from now, people may be laughing at the idea that we nowadays believe in an single universe with boundaries, like we today laugh at people that thought earth was flat as a "pancake".

[@cheesedude1733]

probably true but it does not mean we cannot have punctuation even if it is fueled our limited brains trying to make things easier to skim so we quickly and correctly understand the communication allowing us to pay more attention to the bus coming down the road we are about to cross but that is probably just me

[@imaseeker100]

And you know this exactly how?

[@andersen3948]

@@imaseeker100 I can't know that for sure, just like researchers can't know for sure that there was a big bang, galaxies have been found in the dark zone that shouldn't be there, there is HD 140283 also called metusalem, there is more that indicates that the universe is infinite in every way one that is an indication for a big bang and there are too many holes in the current theories and why even come up with such an idea with a beginning just because there is a beginning and an end for life on earth is not the same as it is for the whole universe everything that is used to explain the universe mathematics time space and direction is man-made and therefore not only something that can be used here on earth as it works here but as soon as you are outside the earth's atmosphere applies things like direction and time no longer, we humans are limited by our technology which cannot see further than what it can and this gives the illusion that there is a beginning or even a wall

[@TimesTicking666]

Seems perfectly plausible to me our universe is just 1 of many! Like what we can see is a raindrop in the pacific

[@alanmctavish3628]

What a wonderful machine!

[@sebolddaniel]

This is by far the best video I have seen on this matter

[@s888li]

maybe our universe is a bubble that merging with another older bubble seeing things older than our own

[@9and7]

Like Andromeda and Milky Way.

[@framethis]

and why stop at only 2 bubbles .There could have been many many more like drops of oil floating on water merging as the water is gently warmed up

[@ziggydemon1455]

Have some more mushrooms! 😵‍💫

[@vhslagter1]

I think it's time to seriously analyze the possibility of multiple universes and what we are seeing is an image of a parallel universe. My theory is that we are in a kind of soap filled with bubbles, each bubble is a universe that inflates and deflates in a continuous cosmic dance.

[@SindariGreymoon]

Cool.

[@Winterxfiles]

On a scale we can't understand but what we consider the beginning was most likely something more like expansion after a phase change or more likely sublimation like solid to gas and we are now seeing evidence that some structures are alluding to the fact that this is all much older and cyclical in nature. wow might need some punctuation in that lol.

[@AgadorSpartacus100]

Thanks so much

[@dasguero9655]

The universe is at least 55 yrs old, pretty sure

[@billt2341]

I wonder if we are meant to understand the" big picture."

[@NotoriousWar]

Have you heard a thing that some some scientist, astronomers & phycisists say, when they're explaining the huge distances & collosal size of space & the universe, some of them say that 'human brains(even the really smart ones), are just not programmed or equipped to really grasp the distances or understand the true scale of the Universe..' Well, I often think, "what if it's not just distances? What if it's the scale of Everything?" & by everything I mean things like the true complexity of what has-is-and will happen(or happened/happening), or how it works, or why it works, or why? Or what Caused it? I often wonder if, just like humans can't comprehend the real size & scale, maybe we're just not Able, to really grasp any of these answers at all? What if we're smart enough to ask these questions, but haven't discovered we're not smart enough to get the answers? & Then I get depressed because even if we are smart enough to find & understand these things, I realise I likely won't be around when we eventually get the answers to any of them. It could take hundreds of years, maybe thousands for some answers, & I'll get to learn none of them, it sucks really...

[@9and7]

I think that's the big question.

[@tommypeacock3298]

NO!!!!

[@valentinmalinov8424]

@@9and7 Nothing is impossible if we want it! If you want to understand "The big Picture" - Just find the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@waynneedwards4444]

I hold to the cyclical origin of the cosmos. It seems to fit a lot of variables that the current view of origination can't explain. I wonder why the electrical component of the cosmos is not utilized in the contemplation of origin hypothesis? Where there is magnetism there is electricity. Maybe the work of Hannes Alfven can shed light on this seemingly conundrum.😊

[@ziggydemon1455]

Inform yourself a little more. Electricity itself is not a force,it is the result of the electromagnetic force, which is one of the four fundamental forces of nature.

[@thekingofmojacar5333]

These extremely old galaxies that are now being discovered thanks to the great JWST probably do not originate from our current universe; they formed at least 16 billion light years ago and the time calculation (of 13.77 billion years) simply does not add up. It has also been found that these ancient galaxies are very bright and extremely mature. All this suggests that there could not have been a big bang, a singularity or dark ages at the beginning of our cosmos. Or our universe is much older than we previously thought, perhaps 18 to 26 billion years old. However, this is most likely not the case. Therefore, it is more plausible that an earlier universe (predecessor) existed before our current universe, which then reformed (renewed) and manifested itself with its light sources in the depths of the space horizon in the same way as our current universe. If that's the case, we can assume that the entire cosmos functions differently, with no real beginning or end, cyclical, strongly oriented towards evolution (bounce cosmology). I'm absolutely convinced that it didn't start with a big bang, what do YOU think? ✨

[@jean-lucpicard4467]

I always thought that the big bang was not very pausible. Something always felt off. It was imho a construct that was convenient to rap things up. Needless to say my curiosity went of the scale again last couple of years. Very exiting times indeed.

[@ziggydemon1455]

Where he mentions16 he indicates the red shift value of that galaxy, not its distance or age. A redshift of 16 means that the wavelength of the light was stretched by a factor of 17, since 1+𝑧=16. This corresponds to a time when the universe was about a billion years old.

[@FlbcImp]

With all the knowledge we now possess and with the continuing gathering of information how is it possible for people to still believe in a creator?

[@Nostromo2144]

How is it possible not to...?

[@valentinmalinov8424]

The answer of your question is in the fathers of astronomy and physics - Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Planck, Einstein all of them was deeply religious. Do you thing those people which give us the understanding and knowledge of the Universe was stupid and only you are smart? For your information it is impossible to understand physics and not believe in intelligent design of the Universe.

[@FlbcImp]

Science not faith,you want to believe in something but have no evidence to support you thinking.

[@FlbcImp]

I'm no way as smart as the people you reference but where is your evidence to prove the existence of a creator.

[@louisesamchapman6428]

@@FlbcImp Believe what you like, the evidence is everywhere !

[@jean-lucpicard4467]

I always thought that the big bang theory was not very pausible. Something always felt off. It was imho a construct that seemed convenient to rap things up. But again, that is just my opinion. Needless to say my curiosity went of the scale again last couple of years. Very exiting times indeed. We need a bigger more powerfull telescope asap (yesterday) and need to go back to the drawing board. Let's see what's more out there to baffle us.

[@RandyZimmerman-pp5wj]

I am a citizen scientist I like learning that what we thought was the rule turned out to be wrong so cool still want to get a ride on those rocket for 1st time weightless at 69 yrs old bucket list lol

[@DuncanMcGonigal]

WQW...the more we see, the more we understand, until the more we see again, as it will always be.

[@SeryaSensus]

Is there any possibility the light velocity it is not constant? If the light velocity is decreasing since the big bang, it means it would be faster in early beginning. 😅

[@arjundhar7729]

Two theories: 1. Agree big bang isn't THE begining but part multiple ongoing bangs and collapses 2. Time itself could have been faster (if we are the observer, and the generation of galaxies then..relative to our time scale happened much faster) ,at the beginning of big bang (relativity 101), and why isn't anyone considering that the constants of our universe as we know it today were not the same then. Change a few constants and everything changes even if the model holds. .. It's really suspicious if the constants are constant and laws of physics themself don't experience a shift.

[@davidyoung8105]

The Universe: is femininely large and small. The plank limit is a myth. It always was and will always be, big bangs or not. Infinity is difficult for mammals to understand.

[@philnovo1832]

Reptiles too!

[@jean-lucpicard4467]

Quasi impossible I would say.

[@jeffrelf]

As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse, "residual eXergy" (potential entropy) fuels both "life" (games) & gravity.

[@ziggydemon1455]

There is no infinit cold. Never heard of absolute zero (-460°F) ? And when the universe dies there will not be a single Joule of energy left, another absolute zero.

[@jeffrelf]

"residual eXergy" (potential entropy) fuels both "life" (games) & gravity. Whether it's enough or not depends on what kind of a being you might be. @@ziggydemon1455

[@Dabebo-xk2bt]

It all started with Let there be, and so it was, and what wasn't, now is and it is good.

[@mezzica01]

At the risk of stating the obvious, the age of “Our” Universe is frankly inestimable. All that can be said with any reasonable degree of certainty is that “Time” is eternal, everything else is up for grabs.

[@Robert-id4tk]

I'm headn' to the dirive-thru 😅

[@ultimatedouchebag6760]

This is the best channel for space and do not talk about the origin of James Webb Telescope over and over again

[@mickdonedee1]

Could our universe be just one bubble within a foam of bubble universes?

[@mikerichards9196]

Yay, foam universe party!

[@artharrison9586]

It’s entirely possible that there are just some concepts that we, as simple life forms, are not capable of understanding.

[@RionFortran]

Called it!

[@alancraddock6836]

There is a vibration frequency to every universe with its own set of rules and absolutes .Black holes are a gateway to another vibrational universe with it own frequencies and rules . At the end of the black hole a white hole appears leading to a gateway to enter this new universe this process goes on ad infinitum . The cycle will never end

[@Steven-v6l]

Infinite universe containing multiple big bang bubbles spread out over space-time.

[@LenovoLenovo-g2f]

We live in a cosmic brain. So simple.😊

[@marklane58]

Two crazy ideas: What if there was no 'big bang'? But rather many little bangs, like my soup when it boils. (Multi-dimensional black holes explaining the missing part of gravitational force) And how come the 'cyclic cosmology theory' seems to be more and more like the Hindu version of creation? - Brahma always sleeps, but when he dreams a universe is created. When he returns to his dreamless sleep the universe is destroyed and the crossover period occurs. Then he dreams another universe again. Crazy me!

[@ffc99]

Dang! I trusted the old science.

[@sluny1]

Never ever believed the old science! The more you think you know…

[@keithobrien5592]

Isn't it possible that "The Big Bang" didn't push everything in only one direction of which we are a part of but in an opposite direction away from where we are?

[@alexbertran3873]

We live in a single heart beat of an ethernal consciousness

[@648Roland]

Have to wonder what exists, at this moment, at the extreme edge of how far back in time we can detect? Ever more questions.

[@ziggydemon1455]

Didn't you watch the video?

[@648Roland]

@@ziggydemon1455 All of it, did you? No matter where we look we are looking back at what was not what is right now or is that too hard for you to comprehend?

[@ziggydemon1455]

@@648Roland The video explains how far back in time JWT can detect. Asking what exist at THIS moment at the edge of the universe is just as weird as wanting to travel back in time to kill Napoleón.

[@hansoosterwal4073]

Couldn't these "galaxies" come from another universe? Because it is said that there exists a multiverse. Maybe different universes sometimes "meet".

[@shaunlaverty8218]

There are more questions than answers and the more we find out, the less we seem to know. (Lyrics of a popular 1970’s song’)

[@ziggydemon1455]

"The more I know, the more I realize I know nothing". Socrates 300 BC.

[@mikedougherty1011]

What is the vertical axis Muv of the redshift plots

[@JackFrost008]

The Universe is Infinite and has no limit.

[@byung4jc]

Would it be related, at least in part, to the presence of Multiverse?

[@ryanhegseth8720]

Turns out they were completely wrong the whole time and those of us who didn’t believe got ridiculed, called science deniers. Turns out it wasn’t science to begin with.

[@fotoave]

What if those distant galaxies are part of another universe that had it’s own big bang. That is the outer edge of a multiverse. Perhaps accretions of large multi black holes explode creating multiple universes

[@deanhotter6054]

Galaxies are moving away from us. Maybe these are 2 that made it past the dark ages on their way out of the observable universe.

[@Elixear]

This is crazy.

[@PaulFenwick-t4x]

I believe all the galaxies in our verse are revolving around its centre..what they are looking at are galaxies close to our universes core

[@TheRealMrBlackCat]

Existence is created... Leftovers from another big bang, far away from ours, intersected with our local big bang maybe. The idea of us living in a bubble doesn't supercede other bubbles or how they might interact.

[@TheHoowee]

I think our universe is much older than we think today and I think earth is too!

[@onehitpick9758]

Earth might be a bit older older, but the universe certainly is much more than just 3 times as old as the earth.

[@nematode9223]

We will never know. And why do we think that we deserve to know?

[@noelleyte-tv]

The Bigbang is the instance of Creation!

[@DarfBleeder]

Just a gut-feel, but I suspect that until we've managed to incorporate Quantum physics and Newtonian/Einsteinian physics into a single model/theory that doesn't break down at the interfaces of each, then we're attempting to solve issues with an incomplete toolkit. We've got watchmaker's tools at one end, blacksmiths' tools at the other and we're missing the socket-set in the middle... Just a suspicion...

[@valentinmalinov8424]

You are right, we need to put order in our understanding of the Universe. We need a simple theory, which explaining the fundamental elements and the forces in the Universe. I have a good news for you - This simple theory exist! - It is in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" I believe that you will enjoy it.

[@markgoddard2560]

It would be helpful not to let Johnny two notes loose for the background music. It’s not necessary and only serves to distract from what is being suggested - which on this occasion was not particularly informed as it is!

[@LordDustinDeWynd]

Back to the cyclical but without the collapse? Makes more sense...

[@miner79r]

In my opinion... So, we are going with a 3D Universe, instead of a 4D or higher Universe? Ooooookaaaayyyy...

[@kensplace8432]

Although NEVER and ALWAYS are my two least favorite words, it seems to me that if we are here now discussing it, there can NEVER have been a state of nothingness, which means that there has ALWAYS been something.

[@Peopleareusuallygood]

Simple. There are many of everything. Welcome to the multiverse 👁

[@sinjohnson7275]

Obviously the Universe is infinite has no beginning nor no end

[@sylvester2294]

New theory! "Tired Light"!!

[@karpabla]

For the well-being of scientists and their salaries, I propose we dont launch any spacial telescooe bigger than JW, and we dont build any accelerator bigger than the LHC.

[@IHSisable]

this is al so midevil thinking - there we just saw 5 planets and thought that that was that....then came hubble and we saw what we saw - and thought that is that - now we have james webb and see things that are new to us....why dont we stop looking - space is everywhere - un ending - it is, full of life and stars....even beynd everything - big bangs happen all the time evrywhere creating a bubble in space that we cannot see beyond

[@alfalf3546]

All those who ridiculed Roger Penrose is very silent now.

[@deanhotter6054]

A new kind of dark matter and dark energy? That sucks, we havnt even figured out the old ones yet 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@louisesamchapman6428]

"Let there be light .".....

[@ziggydemon1455]

The trick with Adam's rib also was a good one.

[@louisesamchapman6428]

@ziggydemon1455 Yeah, who knew bout cloning ?

[@dochombre]

Maybe multiple big bangs With multiple universe's all pushing may cause different factors which are way to hard to check with just our very limited knowledge. The Webb has proven in its short life Just imagine what it will tell us in 5 or 6 years. ThIs place is a lot older than anybody can tell us. Stop guessing.

[@stephenmiller4948]

I was never a believer of the Big Bang theory. This video affirms what I have suspected…not that I am not an astrophysicist or Nobel Laureate or anything!

[@ISOTT78]

We are wrong about the age !

[@thomasdykstra100]

The best telescope money and engineering can produce won't brighten the closed, dark mind looking through it...

[@michaelholt7994]

Then universe started everywhere,thanks to plasma..

[@fuffoon]

I have a suspicion that we are so far off from the reality that we just continue to get further away from the truth. The good part is it won't make any difference in your daily life. Brushing and flossing your teeth is much more important for your well being.

[@peterjohnston1224]

Curious how the big brains keep explaining things in a manner that fits their models. I suppose that's inevitable.

[@brendonmckee4334]

So maybe the back hole is the beginning of a universe, like the gas giant is the beginnings of a sun.

[@JW-hf9ev]

IMHO: Keep an open mind because we still don’t know who we pissed off to blowup the universe. But seriously ebbs and flows are bound to happen on a grand scale in the early period, so freaky groups could form and we’re fine. However if we can see that they can clearly predate our theories then it’s time to do a massive revolution to accept galactic sweeping changes. Also, build any new theory without prejudice.

[@EinarGrondal]

I am partial to universes petering out, yet new ones coming into existence in a cyclic and thus eternal continuum. Just like the Vedas explain. Yugas or eons of time with universes being created and destroyed. 🎉❤

[@ELMohel]

He stretched the heavens

[@brianjacobs247]

The 'Big Bang' may not have happened as we currently understand. The idea of a 'singularity', a single-point origin may not be correct. The universe may have sprung into existence spontaneously at many points. When water boils, it does so at a multitude of points along the 2-dimensional bottom surface of a hot pan. Imagine the universe boiling into existence from a 3-dimensional matrix, with a virtually infinite number of emergence singularities.

[@pmichaelbowden3800]

No big bang, no problem.

[@keithpix]

Why wouldn’t a corresponding view of anything be uncovered as it’s chaotic opposite? Isn’t there an endless font of revelations....each with it’s own unlimited problems and solutions? Aren’t we subjects changing our characteristics like the objects that Webb shows?

[@HariSelden2020]

The current cosmological theory is based on the data that was available at the time. Why should anyone be surprised that new data from far more sophisticated instruments amends the current theories? It's narcissistic to think we already understood the beginnings of the Universe then (or now).

[@ziggydemon1455]

JWT seems to mark the difference, making the house of cards tremble.

[@armandomercado2248]

When in doubt, invoke a black hole.

[@onehitpick9758]

I have calculated that our universe is over 300 trillion years old. There is a horizon beyond which we will not be able to see. That doesn't mean its' a huge explosion there (and everywhere). It just means there's a horizon.

[@johngarrett5189]

I've checked your calculations and they're entirely 🐴 💩

[@russellbaker27]

Where do our memories go when we die. And if there is light at the end of the tunnel, where does it lead to. (. SO many questions. ). Do we really need to know everything. And if we did know everything, WHAT NEXT 😮. 🙏🤔

[@nearlynormal2293]

See, I told you so!

[@tomahawkskipper]

Cosmology is observational science without experiments. The interpretation of those observations is subject to a runaway scientists’ imagination which seems to be always wrong.

[@karagiannisboris]

NOTHING KNEW HALTON ARP SAID THIS BEFORE BUT THEY DID NOT LIKE HIM

[@joshwilliams2105]

It bothers me so much we give degrees to some here and people like Tyson who say "found things that shouldn't exist". Only a fool thinks they know the great complexity of our possibly infinite cosmos. These people need humbling and to remember most of what we know is still theory only. We are likely to never know everything and to try is to pursue madness.

[@abelcompany]

AS WE KNOW: First came the BIG BANG…then the BIG CIGARETTE!!

[@Imavideo]

We think the Universe happened because..............................................of something that wasn't there and could be there.

[@jackmatthews312]

Time for a new guess...

[@bhayescampbell]

Penrose’s cycling universe theory is not widely accepted.