Japan begins releasing Fukushima water

Subscribe to our KZbin channel for free here:
sc.mp/subscribe-youtube
For more on the story: sc.mp/etyz
Japan started releasing treated radioactive waste water from its crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant on August 24, 2023. The long-anticipated move came after Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida visited the facility that was wrecked by a devastating earthquake and tsunami in 2011. Kishida also met with fishing groups, telling them the government would bear “full responsibility” for the impact of releasing the tainted water into the sea. The move has faced strong opposition in Japan and abroad, especially from China and South Korea.
Support us:
subscribe.scmp.com
Follow us on:
Website: www.scmp.com
Facebook: / scmp
Twitter: / scmpnews
Instagram: / scmpnews
Linkedin: / south-china-morning-post
#scmp #Asia #Japan

[@ac8228]

It's interesting to see how western countries are quiet about this issue because Japan is an ally, but imagine if this move was being done by China or Russia... maybe more sanctions?

[@clayturnbull]

Nope-no sanctions if China or Russia because the nuclear cartel always sticks together.

[@scyllasmite4819]

They would release news and press every day loathing it 😂

[@terryliu9015]

It’s because Japan is very far from the west so they can care less

[@anpham605]

@@terryliu9015 nope. Because Japan is ally

[@DccAnh]

@@terryliu9015 China is also very far from the west lol

[@mancn4465]

The problem is, Japan has other solutions, they just choose the cheapest solution and let the world take on their risks

[@doccan3848]

the world better prepare for GODZILLA 🦖

[@YZR3431]

Out of curiousity, what is the other solution?

[@piiche3319]

​@@YZR3431If i'm not wrong, its vapor release

[@Mr.Patrick_Hung]

@@piiche3319 That is a much more dangerous alternative!

[@sokratesowly2256]

lol that definitely doesn't sound any better

[@Convallaria_Majalis-ln4zn]

Two years later 🇯🇵: We have completed the release. We are truly sorry (bows). Twenty years later 🇯🇵: This was something done by people in the past, and it has nothing to do with us now. We are also victims (sobbing). Fifty years later 🇯🇵: Radioactive wastewater? What radioactive wastewater? There was no such thing as radioactive wastewater in history!

[@avamusic8176]

OKAY CHIN CHUN CHAN

[@derpfaceonigiri4950]

Very similar to their history of conquest throughout asia

[@bleh.5258]

@@derpfaceonigiri4950 yep

[@frozensmile6563]

I will explain the exact numbers. The annual tritium emissions that Fukushima Daiichi plans to release into the ocean are less than about 22 trillion becquerels. On the other hand, the current annual tritium emissions from China's nuclear power plants are approximately 90 trillion becquerels at the Hongyanhe 紅沿河 nuclear power plant, approximately 218 trillion becquerels at the Qinshan 秦山 nuclear power plant, 102 trillion becquerels at the Ningde 寧徳 nuclear power plant, and 112 trillion becquerels at the Yangjiang 陽江 nuclear power plant. Do you understand?? China's nuclear power plants pollute the ocean far much more than Fukushima.

[@jerrywang9979]

@@frozensmile6563 do you mean that there's only tritium in fukushima's radioactive water?? do you actually understand the term 核污水 and 核废水？？？

[@benjaminchen5715]

The psychological impact is profound. The fear of radioactivity from nuclear sources lingers in the minds of many, including a vast majority of the Japanese people. If not, why would Japan have reduced its number of nuclear plants from 54 in 2011 to 9 today? North Asians have traditionally struggled with public relations.

[@hastingz9948]

Okay, if the water is safe as you and the Japanese asserted, then please do explain why the Japanese government refused to use the contaminated waste water for drinking or even for agriculture.

[@joelupetz5157]

​@@hastingz9948 Seems like you really have to study more. A solution is being provided and not everything that's clean should be ingested

[@Neethan3247]

​@@joelupetz5157 I am no expert at this topic but you haven't answered his question.

[@rapidaceful]

@@AA-ok5jz show video of that jim smith drink the contaminated water.

[@alvinsoong123]

​@AA-ok5jz do you dare to drink those water directly extracted from the plant on the spot? Prove to us first, then we talk. Else, your just another idiot bot without brain.

[@michellezhao2445]

Japan is not alone in this. The U.S. and other so-called pro-environment countries endorse it.

[@Koohmhm]

How about China and Korea releasing the same water into ocean?

[@dilucragnvindr130]

@@Koohmhm it's fine as long as the international atomic energy agency reviewed it and approved it. The treated water should go to all required processes and the level of radioactivity is below the dangerous level. It's been 10 years and Japan did all they could, they also cooperated with the UN and international partners to do all what is necessary.

[@Koohmhm]

Like spreading Chinese Virus♡

[@MachinegunJ]

@@Koohmhm We are talking about Japan not China and Korea which have nothing to do with release the water.

[@gamer-wd2qr]

​@@MachinegunJ it's called double-face? I mean you condemn other(country) but not yours(country). Something like that.

[@HYZ-nn8qv]

I‘d like to know, if it was China who did this, would there be so many voices of explanation and excuses from western world?

[@shengchuangfeng227]

On the contrary, they would explain why it is so dangerous and how evil China is.

[@kittomottootto]

The tritium concentration emitted by China is 6.5 times that of Japan. tritium concentration of Japan is about 1/40 or less of the international safety standard.

[@DVictorX]

​@@kittomottoottoMore and more useless talking，you shouldnt be comparing country as a way of excuse

[@HYZ-nn8qv]

really? only 6.5 times? It's China, you can say 100 times, your mouth your call, some haters will believe you anyway.@@kittomottootto

[@mutasen_lu]

@@kittomottootto Japan only dares to announce the tritium content but not the content of other radioactive substances. Stop, Japan.

[@siegejay495]

For a culture that developed heavily relying on the ocean , Japan sure has no respect for it.

[@cgeorge3785]

That includes China. But don't let facts get in the way of Japan bashing. ge.usembassy.gov/chinas-overfishing-and-pollution-harm-the-worlds-oceans-video/#:~:text=China's%20fishing%20vessels%20that%20engage,devastates%20fish%20and%20ocean%20life.

[@iliadx7495]

😂

[@Waroyopfami]

Whale killing and all

[@IronTomahawk-sf6bo]

never had. Dolphins and whales are still hunt by japanese with the excuse as biological experiment.

[@hastingz9948]

​@@AA-ok5jzOkay, if the water is safe as you and the Japanese asserted, then please do explain why the Japanese government refused to use the contaminated waste water for drinking or even for agriculture.

[@qfiver1547]

I wouldn't like to confuse people, like this guy. The cooling water in a nuclear power plant is not the same as the sea water that was used to fight the reactor core meltdown as in the Fukushima incident. In a power plant, the cooling water is not in contact with any nuclear fuel, whereas the Fukushima contaminated water was deluged directly on the open reactor cores at extremely high temperature.

[@BansheeN0rn]

You must be an idiot as any water thats cooling down heated nuclear reactor has nuclear radiation just from being near it. I worked at a nuclear plant

[@DHARMIK_M]

but its filtered

[@user-zq3qp8bt1x]

ええ。だからそれは濾過されてから放出されている。

[@winzyl9546]

Yes thats why it was filtered. Do you understand what filtered means?

[@DHARMIK_M]

@@winzyl9546 can i use it for my pasta 🍝?

[@Vyrw]

Imagine that other countries like Russia and China did the same thing Idk why everyone thinks Japan is just a kind, developed country

[@user-dl4rb6oi5e]

If you disagree, why don't you show us the basis for your disagreement? Do you consider Japan is a barbaric, developing country?

[@Vyrw]

@@user-dl4rb6oi5e oh... so you think releasing fukusima water is developed way? Ok then you and your family can eat that nuclear seafood and water

[@ck-bs2ms]

⁠@@user-dl4rb6oi5ewhy don’t you show us that the water is safe? What don’t you drink the water from Fukushima water plant… and eat seafood from Japan…

[@user-dl4rb6oi5e]

@@Vyrw Yes. Radioactive substances other than tritium can be removed within the standard values. And the amount of tritium discharged this time is less than half the amount discharged by Chinese and South Korean nuclear power plants. The US, Australia, NZ and the EU have no export controls on Japanese seafood.

[@user-dl4rb6oi5e]

@@ck-bs2ms Radioactive materials other than tritium can be processed within the standard values. The amount of tritium to be released this time is less than half that of nuclear power plants in China and South Korea. The treated water is seawater and therefore undrinkable. Neither the U.S., Canada, Australia, nor the EU have imposed any export restrictions on Japanese seafood.

[@SS-yy5cw]

It should be evaluated rationally and based on objective data, not emotional ones involving fear and other issues between nations.

[@user-sm2he8gl5b]

exactly

[@im-anon]

Yup, if it's already filtered, diluted, and treated, then it should be fine.

[@dutchbakery2195]

Could not agree more!

[@user-gs5xc9mj1x]

@dellyspiceお前自分の国の下水飲むの？キモ

[@dutchbakery2195]

@dellyspice because it's salt water. and not treated for human consumption. you generally shouldn't drink untreated saltwater. and the water being diluted in the sea represents such a tiny amount of water that it is harmless. the water released is equal to 0.00000000097378277% of all the water in the seas! but drinking the water, even with salt removed, and treated for bacteria, would be bad for the body as the radioactive tritium would be more likely to absorb into the body.

[@asus-ui1wq]

Nuclear waste water is very different from nuclear contaminated water, whereas nuclear waste water does not contact the nuclear reactor directly, but to cool down the shell outside the reactor. But the nuclear contaminated water, or the radio active water, contacted the radio reactor directly, which contains much more radio active elements and in a much higher concentration. Lots of countries release nuclear waste water into the ocean without being criticised internationally is because it is generally less likely to cause harm to organisms in the ocean and has less toxicity. ITS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from the nuclear contamiated water that Japan is releasing NOW! No matter how diluted the toxins are in the water, the total amount will not change! Water will evaporate and most toxins will stay in the ocean! Not to mention some toxins will react with water and being transported by rain! Eventually it will be in every corner of this planet! Japanese government is so fcking selfish of destroying our living environment!

[@cooliipie]

No. This water came in contact with radiation

[@abdulhamid2369]

I see So as a country without nuclear power plant we can blame all countries with nuclear power plant

[@user-tt1ed6ny2d]

even no nuclear plant, still got rare earth mining and processing plant. 😂@@abdulhamid2369

[@Gigasimo456]

Note that "it will be in every corner of the world" is (in exaggeration) exactly how this water release is safe. Letting the ocean do the work and transport this waste water everywhere means that as result the concentration of toxic materials is extremely low everywhere.

[@Gigasimo456]

Also, "water will evaporte and most toxins will stay in the ocean" - uh... This makes no sense at all. Do you mean that the concentration will increase? Please elaborate.

[@wwbren]

Worse thing is by the time we find out something is wrong, the damage cannot be reversed for generations.

[@pology4618]

We can still protest, japan has only just started dumping the water, which lasts for 30 years

[@wwbren]

@@pology4618 in my country, it's illegal to stage protest. However I'm certainly boycotting made in Japan products.

[@comradeofthebalance3147]

There are only 2 points of error is the treatment was not as complete as TESPCO claims, and a second fukushima level earthquake

[@PitsTasteGood]

I think you need a stronger VPN. China is releasing way more wastewater than anyone can imagine. But they are doing it roughly at the same time as Japan so they can point their fingers at Japan.

[@21Kikoshi]

LOL western countries drop more than 10x the amount and France drops maybe 1000x pollution that what Japan is doing. Please inform yourself

[@arusirham3761]

Finally. What a great way to make your neighboring countries angry.

[@lukasbauer586]

and the whole world

[@s.k902]

@@lukasbauer586 Only about five out of one hundred ninety six countries are against this decision.

[@budisoemantri2303]

It seems like East Asia has mastered the art of making their neighbours angry, especially China and North Korea

[@fungj4126]

who cares

[@VanDuc-hm6sp]

War Criminal Hirohito's son and grandson should taste the water...😂😂

[@misterpositive9337]

The answer is right there in the video. Japan releases the water not because it is safe, but because they are runningout of storage tanks

[@saxpride100]

@@Jurk844 Where tho?

[@PitsTasteGood]

Don't believe China. China has been doing the same thing but 3x more. But they are refusing the accusations and abusing the media to focus on Japan.

[@harrisonr6594]

Make more tanks and then what? You just gunna stockpile them forever? Some thing has to be done so that nuclear waste isn’t at an all time high. And then imagine Japan with its tsunami and earthquakes. More containers means more disaster in the near future. It’s a lose lose situation either ways. Store them into even more containers and wait for the next natural disaster or dispose of what they have now and contaminate the ocean anyways

[@bmok4489]

If Japanese said that water is safe, please keep them for yourself

[@user-tx3bt9hd7i]

If nuclear wastewater is safe, the countries discharging it should keep it for themselves instead of letting it flow into the ocean!

[@user-hq3fg1wb4q]

If the radioactive water is safe Japan could release it into their lakes and water catchment areas

[@hastingz9948]

​@@AA-ok5jzOkay, if the water is safe as you and the Japanese asserted, then please do explain why the Japanese government refused to use the contaminated waste water for drinking or even for agriculture.

[@WanwoodTutorials]

@@AA-ok5jz Just because someone else did something worse doesn't make your actions any better.

[@user-sd4nw9vt5h]

​@@AA-ok5jzNot to mention what else is in the water you discharge besides tritium? But there are just hundreds of other types of radioactive elements added

[@ericliume]

@@AA-ok5jz Only the restarted believe their statement.

[@drtwlderma]

Never having any Japanese seafood anymore

[@gg31hh]

Want to convinced the world? ask the Japan PM to go for a swim around the area.

[@silentgamer88]

Sure. You wanna be his swimming instructor first?

[@reon3581]

The annual disposal of tritium is 10 trillion becquerels at the La Algre reprocessing plant in France, 190 trillion becquerels at the Darlington plant in Canada, 112 trillion becquerels at the Yangjiang plant in China and 49 trillion becquerels at the Gori plant in Korea (all in 2021). The annual disposal volume at the Fukushima Daiichi plant is less than 22 trillion becquerels. Why is contaminated water in France, Canada, China and South Korea not reported?

[@gian3379]

The English-language media did not report the crime against humanity about Japan's discharge of nuclear waste water, and the video about it was even limited.

[@thelastdefenderofcamelot5623]

we just opened a Pandora's box.

[@AlbertKimMusic]

It was reported 24/7 elsewhere but not America lol. Pretty funny.

[@Shiningami_Jem]

I thought South Korea did the same thing too 🤔

[@cheeholim2084]

bluefin tuna : at least humans won't eat me now

[@dillon17]

Ive always thought this way.. it doesnt matter if it ''doesn't pose a threat'' WE SHOULDNT THROW ANYTHING INTO THE OCEAN, PERIOD

[@PitsTasteGood]

Don't believe China. China has been doing the same thing but 3x more. But they are refusing the accusations and abusing the media to focus on Japan.

[@noneofyourbuisness1679]

Alright, people place your bets - three-eyed fish or Godzilla?

[@ngolung8924]

hopefully Godzilla

[@furikuri23]

Why cant it be released into lakes and rivers? You get to monitor its effects before it reaches the ocean. It's safe isn't it? That's what the "science" points to.

[@user-cj4tc8kv9t]

Because it's pointless.

[@syanreeze253]

i used to think something similar like why not just release it somewhere at the north pole...until i realized with the quantity of said water would cost billions if they're to do so. now imagine your idea, to release it in the river which obviously they have to bring all the water to the higher elevation of the ground. and with such volume of water, it would take more than 30 years to release it slowly yo not flood the surrounding areas. and.......no, from the source of the water river till it hit the sea bed, it's not enough time to observe the water whatsoever

[@jeanmiyu6904]

IAEA already did analysis the water clarified by the device. The monitor IAEA can see the detail on time was also put. You are just a blinded man.

[@Morningstar-xz5bl]

I actually thought you were being sarcastic, but you're serious, wow

[@hectorvelasco8823]

Coz water cycles dictates that an inland body of water turns into rain.

[@zhaoyuyu5115]

Japan focuses more on saving cost instead of safeguarding marine environment and protecting people’s life and health. On the disposal of nuclear-contaminated water, there are options including long-term storage, hydrogen release, geosphere injection, underground burial, and vapor release. Japan has chosen the discharge plan with minimum cost among all options, shifting the risks of nuclear contamination to the rest of the world. The act of putting money ahead of people’s life and health is doomed to be opposed by the international community.

[@beandispenser6971]

you say all those words without knowing what they mean, research more on their process.

[@jeanmahmoudventilateur3480]

And all of these have been deemed a worse solution than that. You're just misinformed and scared.

[@hastingz9948]

​@@AA-ok5jzOkay, if the water is safe as you and the Japanese asserted, then please do explain why the Japanese government refused to use the contaminated waste water for drinking or even for agriculture.

[@KF-zb6gi]

@@beandispenser6971 then tell us why they're worse option

[@luisasasa5775]

shame on u

[@ericliume]

IT IS nuclear contaminated water, which had direct contact with the nuclear waste, but not nuclear wastewater, which had no contact with the nuclear waste and almost no radioactivity. Sadly it seems nobody mentioned that, according to the latest super computer calculation, the current of the ocean will carry the most concentrated contaminated water to the west coast of Canada and the US. Yes, it will reach East Asia, but not as concentrated as the middle of Pacific Ocean and the west coast of North America. Eventually, the nuclear waste will reach all oceans.

[@qppain_killer44]

Thank you

[@alphasang886]

You are all spreading fake news,,, how many nuclear submarines have sunk in the ocean? Did it affect the whole world? The water that japan releases are safe and are in according to international laws, the only reason China and other countries try to spread fake news is to have import bans and put tariff to Japan's fish industry.

[@sabbirahmed9424]

If it reaches west coast of USA and Canada in future, why are they not worried about it?

[@frozensmile6563]

The Japanese government conducts ocean releases fairly under the guidance and inspection of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Even in the inspection after releasing into the sea, the inspection value is a safe value far below the safety standard. In other words, the Chinese government is repeating unfair political harassment against Japan.

[@ericliume]

@@frozensmile6563That is a lie, IAEA never endorse water release. Director General Grossi of IAEA stated “The release of the treated water stored at the Fukushima Daiichi *is a national decision for the Government of Japan, and this report is neither a recommendation nor an endorsement* of that policy.” Besides, IAEA will not monitor the release everyday. Nobody will know if the released water will be well treated or not. Let alone TEPCO has been lying about the radiation in the past 12 years. Even local Japanese don't trust a single word from TEPCO.

[@iZiggy_]

I can understand why people are upset but I think if this happened in the us it would be way worse I know i would be scared and protest

[@ngolung8924]

I mean I fear radiation and all but I would still trust the nuclear scientists more than my fear of something I don't know.

[@Dumka78]

Don't try to downplay this. Thousand of dead whales will be found on a beach again.

[@frjuy]

@@ngolung8924 don't trust the "experts" easily, you don't know what goes on behind the scene

[@ngolung8924]

@@frjuy Do you know what is behind the scene?

[@anakborneo8276]

Oh don't worry based on the report the first country to taste this water is actually US based on the water current direction 😂

[@adrianchan143]

If it is safe, why not just reuse the water in Japanese households.

[@hastingz9948]

​@@AA-ok5jzOkay, if the water is safe as you and the Japanese asserted, then please do explain why the Japanese government refused to use the contaminated waste water for drinking or even for agriculture.

[@user-dl4rb6oi5e]

@@hastingz9948 It's simple. Seawater cannot be used for agriculture or drinking water.

[@hastingz9948]

@@user-dl4rb6oi5e Have you ever heard of the terms desalination and vaporization?

[@user-dl4rb6oi5e]

@@hastingz9948 Do you know how much it costs? Do you know that the US, Australia, and the EU have no export controls on Japanese seafood?

[@adelalmohtaseb5261]

If that was easy any country would do it to drink water@@hastingz9948

[@ryank3281]

Mother Nature has a way to deliver the “gift” back to Japan.

[@Laming1234]

It must be a very very big gift

[@user-sp4fn4qd5q]

富士山🗻赶紧苏醒吧

[@hastingz9948]

​@@AA-ok5jzOkay, if the water is safe as you and the Japanese asserted, then please do explain why the Japanese government refused to use the contaminated waste water for drinking or even for agriculture.

[@carolinarey8945]

@@AA-ok5jz Safe!? Then go there and have a cup of tea with it, We dare you 🤔

[@RoyL_2060]

​@@user-sp4fn4qd5q😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@kunhe-su4mv]

Japan is nuclear contaminated water, which is in direct contact with nuclear reactor cores. Other countries are nuclear wastewater, and there is no direct contact with nuclear reactor cores. This is the difference between nuclear polluted water and nuclear wastewater.

[@hastingz9948]

​@@AA-ok5jzOkay, if the water is safe as you and the Japanese asserted, then please do explain why the Japanese government refused to use the contaminated waste water for drinking or even for agriculture.

[@chrislee5685]

@@hastingz9948 He is just a bot program to put fake info using fakest name such as Jim Smith. Such bot exiting further proof Fukushima water bad news it may not effect short term but long term it will be disaster.

[@lov3mei480]

@@hastingz9948 why don't you use seawater for drinking or even for agriculture. It safe right 😉

[@YanqiuWang-qd8pc]

@@AA-ok5jzWe’re talking about Japan’s nuclear water, don’t play double standards. If you don’t know how to comment without mentioning China, just shut up.

[@adelalmohtaseb5261]

salt water not the same as clean water used in agriculture@@hastingz9948

[@happymelon7129]

Today, 24-8-2023 is "World Ocean Disaster day“ Demonstrations broke out in many places in South Korea. In Seoul, on August 24, a number of college students tried to break into the Japanese embassy in South Korea to protest. At least 16 people were arrested. The slogans they held contained words such as "The ocean is not Japan's trash can" and "Stop the discharge of nuclear sewage immediately".

[@user-sp4fn4qd5q]

韩国民众很勇敢，也很有正义，这是事实，但韩国政府真的很无能，这是也是事实。

[@KF-zb6gi]

It's really ocean disaster

[@Koohmhm]

@@KF-zb6giWhy no one explain it scientifically😂

[@avamusic8176]

@@Koohmhm CHINE PROPAGANDE NOT NEED

[@zombiekilla7463]

china spy

[@johnsa3567]

From Kyle Hills mini documentary on the incident, you can really see how insignificant the radioactive leak was back then over the ocean let alone how minuscule it is now, I wouldn't be surprised if drinking the diluted treatment water would have no long term effects.

[@FocusedCat]

No one is going to listen to you here. This is a CCP affiliated channel. This bullsht is propaganda to the max. china releases 4 times the amount of contaminated water, of what Japan is releasing and china has been doing it for at least a decade now. The only reason this is news now is because the CCP wants eyes off them. See this comment reply of mine get deleted.

[@Shaker626]

Don't let the Chinese hear this, their minds will explode!

[@ThePrevious1234]

Everyone complaining about the discharge needs to get use to it. The water will be released over a 40+ year period

[@Listenandchillzz]

Other countries also releasing their nuke waste. Why they are'nt getting sanctions?

[@raphaelledesma9393]

If the nuclear experts say that the released levels are within safe limits then who am I to argue? In reality, people don’t understand that a lot of things that naturally occur in daily life are harmful only in certain levels. It’s a pity people distrust experts who have studied far more than we have about the matter. It’s this distrust that caused people to not trust doctors during the pandemic.

[@FocusedCat]

Because, this is a CCP affiliated channel.

[@igobykkat]

@@FocusedCatOf course this is what you have to say.

[@warzone147]

30 years later , Japanese govt : sorry its a decision made by the pervious administration not our fault. 50 years later , Japanese govt : What water ? don't know what you are talking about.

[@kenrock2]

erase from history text book

[@daciimini8672]

Just like they do on occupation attrocity

[@123321ps]

Yeah for sure. Japanese school text book also stated there were no Nanking Massacre but the west already marked this incident in their historical record.

[@VanDuc-hm6sp]

That War Criminal Hirohito's son and grandson should taste the water...😂😂

[@indrajaya9585]

​@@kenrock2They already block this information

[@X1erra]

It's not that I don't agree with Japan releasing water entirely, but everyone around me voices strong opposition. I'm just here thinking of the scientific implications on the ocean as a whole. Maybe, it might have zero impact or very miniscule effects since the ocean is way bigger than 5 olympic pools, or just 0.01% of the whole ocean. Hopefully our worries end up harmless, and so that's what I'm counting on as a best case scenario.

[@moldenm5239]

I'm concerned about long term impact. E.g. if you eat decades of these fish and they accumulate in organisms that consume them. Then shows up decades later. Eating some for short term is ok but we are looking at multi-decade implications.

[@Waldemarvonanhalt]

I really wish Asian media would be asking important, contextualizing questions to dispel fearmongering, like: Is the Fukushima water dangerous? kzbin.info/www/bejne/poeUhJeroLOnibs How much TRITIUM is in the FUKUSHIMA water? kzbin.info/www/bejne/raCve3qHbp2JjZIsi=hpFSs1CLwj8VNnO1

[@user42344]

It will have zero impact. People are in the state of hysteria over nothing.

[@Ellen-vj6ix]

The point is why we need to try it by our health and even lives. It is carzy and selfish.

[@user42344]

@@Ellen-vj6ix You are demonstrating the hysteria that I just mentioned. No one will be trying anything out with their health or lives, Jesus f**king Christ.

[@john23402]

Why didn't Japan purify and reuse the water for drinking, cleaning, and irrigation, assuming the water is safe?

[@FullNormality]

I think it’s salt water.

[@mismis3153]

Same reason some people are scared alone at night in their homes. Same reason most people wouldn't go sky diving even if it was free. Sometimes, even if you know something is safe, you'd rather just not, it's a psychological thing.

[@m3m3lord61]

They purified the water for every other radioactive substance except for Tritium, which is unable to be filtered. If the water was released in lakes and drinking water, then they would be concentrated with tritium. The ocean dilutes that water, plus no one drinks ocean water 😂 Tritium goes away after 12.3 years. It shall be released gradually over years, all of which has been approved by the strict standards of The International Atomic Energy Agency.

[@user-tx3bt9hd7i]

So why don't countries use the "cooling water" that is flowing into the sea as drinking water?

[@john23402]

Japan is dumping nuclear-contaminated water into the sea. It is not cooling water. @@user-tx3bt9hd7i

[@opiuchi864]

I feel bad for the japan fishing industry. they already don't make a lot of money, imagine how much less they'll make after this.

[@cocaineminor4420]

Japan economy will probably slow down and drop due to fishing industry

[@mewletter]

It will collapse and the fishermen will see their catch lessen and contaminated soon. Who want mutated and cancer ridden catch anyway?

[@zombiekilla7463]

i feel bad for chinese citizens cause they live in a dictatorship

[@HowToChangeName]

Why dont just use the water for personal comsumption first? Its safe so its a total waste of clean water you can use to irrigate

[@lucretius8050]

Cause most nuclear plants are constructed near sea in the first place so they can release the waste water given that it is the standard for similar reactors. The water used for cooling was originally purified water so it makes no sense to put additives back for general use. And if you have a problem then you should be telling it to the whole world that have similar reactors doing the same, which is why most of the other parts of the world have no problem after IAEA's reports.

[@dilucragnvindr130]

The water from the Fukushima plant is already treated except for Tritium which is difficult to separate that it needs to be released and be diluted with sea water gradually. The international atomic energy agency already reviewed and approved this action.

[@JimmieAugustusTheodorus]

ALPS treated water is meant to meet safety standards and it is not for drinking, nor for daily use. It's to reduce/minimize environmental pollution. Our daily sewer wastewater is treated and discharged into rivers and finally flows into the sea. You don't drink/use treated sewer water not because the water is extremely harmful to humans but because there are different standards for drinking water and domestic wastewater, and not all water can be used for daily use and stored as drinking water. They dont teach you these scientific facts in your country?

[@rosem.4308]

if the water is safe, why are they wearing radiation suits 🤔

[@Holycryptonite47]

Imagine if they dumped the whole water in the ocean and then there was a tsunami that brought it back to them...

[@derpymcderpello5381]

Wouldn't be a problem, at least in terms of radioactivity.

[@degeneratewilson]

This is very hypocritical given how china has been doing the same thing and not at all cooperating with other countries investigations to mitigate the impact in their own waters while japan has actually very open and compliant with others.

[@softibuns]

Japan is nuclear contaminated water, which is in direct contact with nuclear reactor cores. Other countries like China or South Korea are nuclear wastewater, and there is no direct contact with nuclear reactor cores. This is the difference between nuclear polluted water and nuclear wastewater.

[@m3m3lord61]

​@@softibuns Not really dawg, Japanese standards require they release at most below 22 trillion becquerels per year, which is far stricter than China and South Korea, who in 2021, the Yangjiang nuclear plant in China discharged around 112 trillion becquerels of tritium, while the Kori power station in South Korea released about 49 trillion becquerels of the radioactive material. China’s Fuqing power plant in Fujian province releases about three times more tritium into the Pacific than the planned Fukushima discharge. Even if the water is so-called contaminated differently, there will still be less tritium than what China and South Korea releases.

[@softibuns]

@@m3m3lord61 source?

[@m3m3lord61]

@@softibuns the industry ministry

[@gabj6816]

​@@softibunswumao

[@the_dragon_gamer8850]

I don’t really see major safety issue regarding discharge tritium-laced water into water as long as they don’t release it all at once. They decompose quite relatively quick. I think people are just overreacting

[@papamudashowtime]

Japan : its time to feed our godzilla with nuclear waste! 🎉 Godzilla: arigatou!

[@mikz8694]

just like AI, asking permission is harder than saying SORRY because no LAWS that RESTRICT uncertain.

[@patrickcollins8048]

I think it’s worth mentioning that the radioactivity in the Fukushima water is almost entirely tritium, a type of hydrogen. For scale, the Pacific Ocean contains 8,400 grams of pure tritium, while Japan will release 0.06 grams of tritium every year. The minuscule amount of extra radiation won’t make the tiniest jot of difference. A lifetime’s worth of seafood caught a few kilometres from the ocean outlet has the tritium radiation equivalent of one bite of a banana.

[@cauwenberghsroeland8607]

DRINK it, no? So you will reduce tensions.

[@patrickcollins8048]

Obviously the only reason why China and South Korea oppose the decision is because they never forgave Japan for slaughtering millions of their citizens in 1940s

[@s.k902]

@@cauwenberghsroeland8607 Countries with nuclear power plants in the world discharge treated water from nuclear power plants. Why don't you say the same thing to those countries?

[@kodetumbuh]

Yes that make sense so release it at reservoir water and dam not ocean

[@nancymcgee4776]

They don't want to hear that because it might sound logical and doesn't fit the agenda!

[@icac6122]

To be honest, i dont think anyone on an island should hold a nuclear plant. Its ridiculous.

[@drunkdriver]

They should do what the chinese do. Release it quietly at night and deny it happened if anyone asks.

[@user-sr7wr2wp7k]

你有证据吗？胡说八道。给我滚远点。

[@ricohflex777]

Japan will forbid sale of Fukushima seafood to their own Japan population. All the nuclear tainted seafood will be exported to Taiwan (especially Taiwan it being a quasi-colony of Japan), Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore. You have to undertstand what the Japan Govt means when it insists the release of nuclear water is "safe'. Safe for people living in Japan.

[@youmemeyou]

The Taiwanese who support this will have fluorescent hairs and pink eyes and their offspring will have 15 fingers in each hand and will be a hermaphrodite after a decade!

[@gethina-come7885]

Welp, China already banned any Japan seafood

[@nemui384]

Source?

[@genzhufang8238]

台湾是中国的台湾，请不要扭曲事实，日本将会受到惩罚，和伤害他们自己的人民和全世界的人民 Taiwan is China's Taiwan, please don't distort the facts, Japan will be punished, and hurt their own people and the people of the world

[@Sunygal95]

This is not true.lol😂

[@MachinegunJ]

The best way to prove that water is safe is to apply it to the production and daily life of the Japanese people. If there are no problems after 5 years , I have nothing to say about how much Japan emits😊

[@pisceshuang949]

go to search the news, Japanese people won't buy any products make or grow in the citys or state close to the nuclear power plant

[@moldenm5239]

its a multi decade experience. we will see impact in 20-30 years timeframe.

[@softerhaze]

Right? Like they don't even have to drink it. Use it to flush their toilets or something 😂

[@Waldemarvonanhalt]

I really wish Asian media would be asking important, contextualizing questions to dispel fearmongering, like: Is the Fukushima water dangerous? kzbin.info/www/bejne/poeUhJeroLOnibs How much TRITIUM is in the FUKUSHIMA water? kzbin.info/www/bejne/raCve3qHbp2JjZIsi=hpFSs1CLwj8VNnO1

[@Shay45]

They have been eating and producing fish from that area for years.

[@Gelinauu]

If it is safe, why doesn't the Japanese government keep this "precious" water that can be used for drinking and irrigation

[@ghsense2626]

If they bottle that water, will you drink?

[@JimmieAugustusTheodorus]

ALPS treated water is meant to meet safety standards and it is not for drinking, nor for daily use. It's to reduce/minimize environmental pollution. Our daily sewer wastewater is treated and discharged into rivers and finally, it flows into the sea. You don't drink treated sewer water not because the water is extremely harmful to humans but because there are different standards for drinking water and domestic wastewater, and not all water can be used for daily use and stored as drinking water. They dont teach you these facts in your country?

[@Gelinauu]

The nuclear contaminated water discharged by your country, do not think that it will be diluted to the sea, no matter how diluted, you should know that the microorganisms in the sea are infected, eaten by small shrimp, small shrimp are eaten by small fish, small fish are eaten by big fish, and the heavy metal accumulated by this nuclear waste in the big fish is so much, can you say that you will not eat seafood in the future? Water on Earth moves from one place to another through the "water cycle." Water is flowing!@@JimmieAugustusTheodorus

[@Gelinauu]

If it's safe, why are people in your own country against it?@@JimmieAugustusTheodorus

[@Gelinauu]

So you said you couldn't drink it? You can release this nuclear-contaminated water into the ocean, and Marine life can drink it? That's your excuse for destroying the ocean, isn't it?@@JimmieAugustusTheodorus

[@user-jiehu]

Mr. SCMP, why did you remove titles from videos' thumbnail? It was very useful! Please write them again.

[@solo9601]

Japan trying to create Godzilla for real

[@zhenchambers6293]

When was the last time that the government take FULL responsibility of sth?

[@Mr.Patrick_Hung]

The most important key point was saved for the very last sentence. That is tricky reporting. ☹

[@hong4033]

What so difficult of storing that water somewhere for eternity

[@curryhousechicken]

Fish with two heads start showing up in Japan

[@michaelsomething7674]

If they believe it wouldn't be any affects on people then have them dumped it in a lake and let the Japanese politicians swim in it

[@Yen-jw1ls]

the prime minister ate the fish from that water as a demo apparently. does that count?

[@qingyunjian7]

If it's so safe, why package it into bottled water and drink it 😂

[@sepek51]

exactly, just drink it if it safe

[@hastingz9948]

​@@AA-ok5jzOkay, if the water is safe as you and the Japanese asserted, then please do explain why the Japanese government refused to use the contaminated waste water for drinking or even for agriculture.

[@wynn3077]

Would it be as safe as Chinese tap water.

[@hastingz9948]

@@wynn3077 wow you're making China your scapegoat now, when's the last time you see Chinese dumping 1.32 million metric tons of nuclear waste water into the pacific ? does responsibility exist in your Japanese dictionary ?

[@youtuwang8336]

How much do you earn by posting this comment? (I have seen it many times) Japan would rather spend 70 billion yen to deal with "negative information" than 34.9 billion yen to safely deal with nuclear sewage.@@AA-ok5jz

[@ooiutube]

If it's so safe and has minimal impact on the environment, how about shipping it to US and Europe and then release the contaminated radioactive water into the ocean around them?

[@jayfalcon-rw3qc]

I agree with the comments made by the environmental scientist. There is a public misunderstanding of how the technology works and what the process of filtering nuclear waste water is. Fukushima isn't the only nuclear power plant in the world, and so it isn't the only facility that produces nuclear waste. People are in a rush to protest this but not the everyday emissions produced by fossil fuel burning cars and electric power plants and other applications known to contribute to global warming. You could argue that all of it is bad, but we're all using and relying on the power generated by one form of it or another. Fighting for improvement of nuclear energy or for more renewable energy is one thing. But I think there's a lot of emotions and misguided feelings from the public on this one

[@Koi-ye4pb]

Japan has done this since long time ago not just now

[@clifforddang5947]

Looking at Japan putting on a show by having some media questioning the release of this watery, very evasive move by Japan!

[@DRIFTER-cc1gm]

IDIOT thats THEM being TRANSPARENT UNLIKE CHINA who dump their UNTREATED CONTAMINATED NUCLEAR WATER in the ocean EVERYDAY secretly without anyone notice, but you dont know that cuz your an idiot

[@m3m3lord61]

It's way better than the Chinese method of evading any and every press reporter asking them questions 😂

[@clifforddang5947]

@dellyspice Yup

[@PitsTasteGood]

Japan literally didn't do anything more than just point the finger back at China who is doing exactly the same thing but on a massive scale.

[@poa-mr2gh]

Nuclear water gets released and accidentally exposedd a crocodile hence becoming the Godzilla. Goodluck earth 😢

[@noellemcclain]

Absolutely disgusting.

[@azurecliff8709]

The people of the world seem to be unaware of the huge amount of tritium disposal emissions from nuclear power plants in France and Canada. Furthermore, the tritium disposal emissions from nuclear power plants in China and South Korea far exceed the tritium disposal emissions from Fukushima. The ignorant Chinese do not know at all these facts.

[@gregoryturk1275]

This whole issue is just Chinese propaganda.

[@DVictorX]

The ignorant japanese dont learn about what they did 50+ years ago，also you shouldnt use comparing countries as an excuse to what japan is doing rn just because its “less”

[@leo-um3pj]

as a canadian, i didn’t know that. this interests me thanks

[@reon3581]

Annual disposal of tritium is ten quadrillion becquerels at the La Argre reprocessing plant in France, 190 trillion becquerels at the Darlington plant in Canada, 112 trillion becquerels at the Yangjiang plant in China and 49 trillion becquerels at the Gori plant in Korea (all in 2021). The annual disposal volume at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is less than 22 trillion Becquerels. Why is contaminated water in France, Canada, China and South Korea not reported?

[@azurecliff8709]

I will explain the exact numbers. The annual tritium emissions that Fukushima Daiichi plans to release into the ocean are less than about 22 trillion becquerels. On the other hand, the current annual tritium emissions from China's nuclear power plants are approximately 90 trillion becquerels at the Hongyanhe 紅沿河 nuclear power plant, approximately 218 trillion becquerels at the Qinshan 秦山 nuclear power plant, 102 trillion becquerels at the Ningde 寧徳 nuclear power plant, and 112 trillion becquerels at the Yangjiang 陽江 nuclear power plant. Do you understand?? China's nuclear power plants pollute the ocean far much more than Fukushima.

[@barazanthualir539]

I like the Japan 50 years ago, against war and against polluting the ocean. But now, they behave differently from those classic Japanese animations.

[@Dea.-fq2wm]

50 years ago, Japan created wars of aggression against China, the Nanjing Massacre, and other wars that destroyed humanity! Japan hides this history, it is an aggressive country! Only Chinese people remember this heartbreaking experience, and we will never forget it. We hope that the world can remember this experience, rather than being confused by Japan's so-called "commercial animations". We have no confusion or even guessed that Japan has done so. This is Japan! 2:31

[@user-mk1se8nw5f]

50年前日本反对战争是我听过最好笑的笑话，日本人表面功夫不错，把像你这样的人骗的团团转😂

[@serbaserbi6004]

Did u know japanese have 2 face ? Their neighbour know the japanese poker face

[@user-mk1se8nw5f]

@@serbaserbi6004 日本是不要脸

[@barazanthualir539]

@@AA-ok5jz It's funny, nowadays whoever created the problem will use China to explain their mistakes, definitely not political. BTW The Japanese government said it was 5 times, TEPCO said it was 20 times, your British professor said it was 2 times, and the Japanese media said it was 80 times. It was not even negotiated which number to say. . .

[@someonerandom6137]

Sounds like the beginning of a plot for some giant/mutated monster movie which is so Japan like.

[@horizone4872]

Dear, too many movies 😊 Go take a walk outside

[@norodom2074]

That’s funny because china’s fujian power plant releases 3 times more waste than Japan. And that’s only from 1 power plant.

[@pookichan9794]

source: BBC and CNN

[@ivychanlife]

It's so interesting to see how people are overreacting to this matter when China is already releasing more than what Japan is doing right now... It's not like something only Japan started...

[@saintofducks5612]

But the thing is people have been complaining about china especially nearby countries. It's just better not to bet on the chance and regret it later

[@LewdDuck]

Ah yes, we're validating Japan's actions with China's actions. You're trying to validate a lesser evil by saying that there is a greater evil, but that doesn't matter because they're both evil.

[@emeraldbreeze5204]

Japan's safety is guaranteed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), so why are China and South Korea opposed❓

[@user-ks3kn8jz1z]

彼らはただ批判したいだけ。　日本に関するすべてのことに対して批判します。

[@banana_in_bottle4764]

South Korea govt did not opposed. They are more realistic and verified with IAEA using scientific evaluations. As usual for democratic country, public always distrust their own govt and love street protest. on the other hand, Chinese public always agree with their govt. NO IDEA why Chinese govt disagree with IAEA. Maybe they are better than IAEA?

[@ihavenojawandimustscream4681]

Why do Japan not use the water for agriculture if it is so safe? Because Japanese people know the danger of radiation, even today the hibakushas are excluded from society because of radioactivity

[@Dino-pk5hc]

China are hypicrites ! how about UN investigate the destruction on South China Sea

[@user-zq3qp8bt1x]

@@ihavenojawandimustscream4681処理水は海水で薄められているため、農業や飲用に使えないのは明らかだ。

[@adityaarirfc]

They're one step closer creating a godzilla by dump the nuclear waste into the sea 😂

[@mutasen_lu]

Japan only dares to announce the tritium content but not the content of other radioactive substances. Stop, Japan.

[@JimmieAugustusTheodorus]

Never heard of ALPS? No wonder...

[@Sebstian342]

Japan is the cleanest country in the world and are the most nicest and kind people.... *Rolls Eyes*

[@KenzoTan1942]

They are pretentious, people love to live in an illusion.

[@alan.92]

Aww did a Japanese person hurt you?

[@Sebstian342]

​@@KenzoTan1942 true and based

[@Sebstian342]

​​@@alan.92Lmao, spoken like a true Japanese defender 🤣

[@alan.92]

@@Sebstian342 Nice try deflecting. Sounds like nobody likes you anywhere.

[@ycf922]

IF THE SCIENCE CLAIM THE WATER IS SAFE , WHY NOT RELEASE THEM WITHIN JAPAN OR PROVIDE TO JAPANESE HOUSEHOLD??? Seems dodgy

[@yvonnefu5088]

They are lying to the public

[@Yen-jw1ls]

cause the other countries don't so unfortunately japan copy them 😢

[@JimmieAugustusTheodorus]

ALPS treated water is meant to meet safety standards and it is not for drinking, nor for agriculture, daily use. It's to reduce/minimize environmental pollution. Our daily sewer wastewater is treated and discharged into rivers and finally flows into the sea. We don't drink treated sewer water not because the water is extremely harmful to humans but because there are different standards for drinking water and domestic wastewater, and not all water can be used for daily use and stored as drinking water. They dont teach you this in your country?

[@cary888]

But isn’t China already doing this if not worst on a daily basis now? I’m not a fan of this but at least they are being transparent and are being monitored by other organizations unlike others.

[@aditwfh]

Do you wanna create a Godzilla? Because this is how you create a Godzilla

[@jameszhang5377]

I’m not a scientist but I know the difference between nuclear cooling water and nuclear contaminated water😢

[@courtly5982]

hey look its the new godzilla king of the monsters trailer,

[@banri4820]

treated waste water in japan compared to chinese waste water is not treated and is just released onto the sea

[@katrinaghm]

If it's not harmful, why don't you just use it inside of your territory? The population in Japan is over 100 Million and they should have enough capacity to consume the nuclear waste instead of putting the ocean and your neighboring countries into risk.

[@adamr9570]

If there’s any country I trust, it’s Japan. ❤ 🇯🇵

[@GarrixianXD]

Japan devil country.

[@wanpingchan8362]

You see the environment professor keep quiet and protecting Japan. Even own Japanese also protest.

[@anthonykeenan9708]

Will it be like the simpsons? 3 eyed fish?

[@burnoutminion]

Do you think this would go with any repercussion to the ocean and 🌍?

[@ErnestJay88]

Ocean is big enough to "dilute nuclear waste" you won't feel the difference. That what they said, until fisherman around the world start fishing 3 eyed fish, 2 headed turtle 🗿

[@alienalien1925]

Technically, its all about money. Who will and should pay for the endless storage fee? US? Japan? The world? anyway, US secretary of state just said he is happy with the release and the water is 100% safe in ocean. maybe US should import the wastewater to Alaska or California so everybody will be happy and that's the proof of a great America. US save the world again, last time was in Marvel.

[@jeffreyxu5406]

只小礼而无大义的国家

[@hastingz9948]

​@@AA-ok5jzOkay, if the water is safe as you and the Japanese asserted, then please do explain why the Japanese government refused to use the contaminated waste water for drinking or even for agriculture.

[@user-bf9kn3sx3l]

垃圾国家

[@Galapheus]

This makes me extremely sad

[@lyunz]

imagine u were swimming in the near coast, because you dint heard the news and get stage 3 cancer after u dive

[@tkma]

貯めてても放出しても批判される日本政府可哀想😭

[@bbbouy242]

So in other words they would rather dump the toxic water into the ocean rather than risk another natural disaster destroying the storage tanks storing the nuclear waste water and it spilling on the ground... If they are afraid of that, then this water can't be safe for the environment... especially fish in the sea..

[@rhaelfixer2584]

What a dumb take, you do realize land contamination is even worst right? In some case if radioactive become too high, the land will become inhabitable. This will displace those people in Fukushima to other state. Sure dumping in water is equally bad for the environment. But that sure don't justify to wait for a natural disaster to occur and see what would happen. Also you forgot something, Japan is an Island country, this mean Fukushima will have lake or drainage system connect to the Ocean. So even in your own logic the scenario is even worst contaminated land and sea.

[@derpymcderpello5381]

@@rhaelfixer2584 Dumping water isnt bad for the environment, the main contaminant of this water is tritium, used in everyday watches. The concentration is extremely low and tritium is extremely weak in terms of radioactivity, I know because I have tritium sources.

[@rhaelfixer2584]

@@derpymcderpello5381 What about prolonged exposure?

[@derpymcderpello5381]

@@rhaelfixer2584 Well prolonged exposure to the water wouldn't even be bad because the amount of tritium is that low. Probably not even detectable on a Geiger counter and I guarantee you get more radiation from the radon in your house than you would drinking that water. In order to detect that small level of tritium in those tanks, you would need to get something called a gamma spectrometer and that starts at $1,000. There is more tritium naturally occurring in the ocean than there is and will ever be in those tanks.

[@rhaelfixer2584]

@@derpymcderpello5381 If that is the case, you wouldn't mind them dumping this substance to the Ocean? Why would you risk it and wait for a natural disasters to occur to spill on land. You do realize there tons of water, it is not gonna be a splash of water, more likely the water will flood the area they are located. Also they are at 97% already. What happened if no natural disasters occur during that period?

[@Infiltrator_]

To all the people mad about this just note the water is safe and china does the same every year.

[@djallalnamri1]

"bear full responsibility"... what does that actually mean?

[@lawrance6540]

2100, imagine all new born babies has nuclear element in it

[@s.k902]

You'd better study science.

[@silentgamer88]

Bold of you to assume humanity would even be able to survive for another 70 years

[@frozensmile6563]

Why doesn't the Chinese government apologize to the Tibetans who suffer from birth defects due to the Chinese government's nuclear tests?

[@untitledgoose1637]

Bro starting the Godzilla cannon event 💀

[@Auroral_Anomaly]

It is safe. It is dilute. Everyone will be okay. People just hear the word nuclear and freak out.

[@miguelangelcorderoramos-mu5wo]

No matter how diluted you make poison it will still have elements of the poison

[@ArchaiVR]

yeah and the sea naturally has tritium, after desalinating seawater you can drink it so whats the issue? granted nuclear testing has inflated this number, but globally it still is far below anything considered dangerous.

[@miguelangelcorderoramos-mu5wo]

@@ArchaiVR shhh no one asked you

[@reon3581]

It's impossible to treat it perfectly. Any toxic substance is not dangerous if it is diluted. There are certain people who do not understand this.

[@ArchaiVR]

@@reon3581 yup I could easily drink a solution of arsenic if I diluted it with enough water but I’d probably die from too much water first.

[@miguelangelcorderoramos-mu5wo]

@@reon3581 depends on how that will effect generation down the line. im sorry did you already do a full on investigation through out generations to see what happens down the line of ur generation. Did you already live and die

[@ItachiUchiha-gf4fz]

It's best if they release it every 23 hrs and at least one hour of diagnostic or maintenance. This will ensure that things will be inspected and if problems occur then instead of a massive halt, they'll just make sure to properly fix it. Well, they are probably saying that the water is filtered already so they'll just release it in 24/7.

[@cjmlads]

this will be the start of the Kaiju 怪獣 Era.

[@tonymaccaroni5744]

Look what they did to whales and now this. Pure evil.