How the Apollo Spacecraft works: Part 2

[@JaredOwen]

Help me translate this video in your language: kzbin.info_video?v=tl1KPjxKVqk&ref=share

[@lydavid9146]

I will try my best to do it

[@NormanInvestigativ]

Jared, hi! Can i use max 10-20 Sec of your Animation for my Moon-Video?I will credit your name and link to this original Video? Please.

[@Blueflag04]

I love this

[@tommypetraglia4688]

@Bilal Khalid Derp

[@tommypetraglia4688]

@Bilal Khalid Make that Dank DERP

[@redball7362]

Dude......Thanks, It´s amazing how many talented people we have on the internet creating educational content. Thanks again!

[@JaredOwen]

Thank you!

[@cykablyat2438]

lmao yea i learn more of this than i learn from school

[@lannliu4555]

Can’t put it better myself... with all those negativity about internet, lost in words when seeing such a video in my feed. also can’t imagine the amount of work the creator has put in - rocket science + animation skills + story telling (in random order)..

[@MarcoMa210]

And its very sad that these channels dont have as many subs as these crappy channels like 5 min craft

[@user-ni9pk9rb6k]

@@MarcoMa210 yes

[@HistoricalWonder720]

Imagine being the one person to remain in the module while it orbits around the dark side of the moon..all by yourself..in space. Thats scary.

[@twiks8446]

That's what happened...

[@steverodgers8425]

Read Michael Collins book "Carring the Fire" Or Al Wordens book "Falling to Earth " Both were CSM pilots who orbited the moon alone.

[@Blueflag04]

And the two astronauts died so you are stuck....... Alone

[@steverodgers8425]

@@Blueflag04I can assure you the CM could pilot the spacecraft's return for a successful splashdown. And he would not be alone. He would have the entire world's rapt attention and prayers as he embarked on his journey into the loving embrace of family, friends and colleagues.

[@planpitz4190]

@@Blueflag04 Dont forget that most of the Astronauts were battle hardened hero Air force and Navy pilots!Cool as Cucumbers in any Situation. They were not more alone in space than sitting in a Sabre Jet shot at by MIG 15s and SAM missiles over North Korea . Better, in the worst case, die alone in space than falling into Chinese or North Korean enemy hands, i would say .

[@pushing2throttles]

It's April 2021 as I write this comment. You made this video 4 years ago and I've watched it several times. Actually, I've watched all 3 parts of this Apollo series several times. It never gets old. Jared Owens, you did such a good job on it! It's so simple, yet so educational and entertaining.

[@JaredOwen]

Hi Gibran - thanks so much for your comment! These videos bring back such good memories and I'm glad you like them. I am planning more space animations for later this year😁

[@flyentity]

Thanks so much for making this. It's far better than nearly every explanatory programme on Apollo I've ever seen on television (and that's quite a lot). I appreciate you going to so much trouble with your modelling and research. I'll be sure to catch all your other videos now I've discovered this series. Thanks again.

[@Nunavuter1]

This video finally gave me a clear idea of how the free-return trajectory works. The spacecraft was not accelerated to Earth escape velocity (as is often suggested), but was instead placed in a highly elliptical Earth orbit that intersects the Moon. By doing nothing, the Moon's gravity will swing the craft back toward the Earth. This is an elegant fail-safe that I'm sure the crew of Apollo XIII appreciated. Only minor course corrections are needed, and the main engine can remain shut off.

[@JoelLeBras]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! Everybody works. Go on laughing and eating popcorn. The computer you use to spread your shit is based on mathematics. Have a good sleep after eating popcorn.

[@MrT------5743]

@A Stunning Estate And D!ck Pills ! You said outside of the US and UK no one believes it, but China, ESA, Russia etc all have sent spacecraft and know the truth. One day soon there will be more moon orbits and landings and all these conspiracists will be proven wrong.

[@masonmtb7]

A Stunning Estate And D!ck Pills ! Proof?

[@bubblegumbabeface6629]

@A Stunning Estate And D!ck Pills ! What's never made sense to me about all these conspiracies is, I can understand why they'd make all this up during the cold war to beat their enemies, pretty easy motive, but why would they then make up them failing at it. Like with Apollo 13 , challenger, Columbia. Why would you want to make up you failing. I just got done watching 4 hours of unedited audio from the Apollo 13 incident. You're telling me, a bunch of people for no particular reason were over radios talking to each other for over 50 or so hours trying to fix an airsystem in a non-existent space craft, for no reason despite those recordings not being released for ages, so the public wouldn't have been able to hear this faking anyway until long after it was done? Even for a hoax, that sounds extremely unnecessary and pointless, especially if people already believe you've been to the moon. Moreover alot of people watched those rockets taking off and going into space, I watched as Columbia broke up when it came back into the atmosphere. What's more if you have the money and you want too, reflective mirrors from the Apollo Missions have been placed on the moon, you can bounce a HPL off of it and get the reading back so you can literally do the math yourself and determine the distance.

[@bubblegumbabeface6629]

@A Stunning Estate And D!ck Pills ! Normally I'd kind of understand what you're saying until you're takin through the math of it all. One thing I look at to determine if something is a hoax or not is, "How many other things do I have to believe in order for me to be able to maintain that this is a hoax" With some things, not very much. Thus, that hoax stays closer and closer to reality. They can still make sense, the math of it being a hoax while unlikely could still work. With all of this over the corse of more than 50 years, and each little tiny piece. I'd have to start believing in near mystical proportions of things in order to maintain that all this stuff was a hoax or even most of it was, I'd have to believe things not only from this country but other countries all around the world. That's when it starts to fall apart. A hoax falls apart when believing the actual story takes less to consider than believing in the conspiracy. You have people out there wanting me to believe Space isn't real or things oare holograms or 3D CGI, that or millions of people are payed actors over the course of years....which becomes laughable when you're not a laymen in those things and you actually know how those things work and what it would take for you to fake stuff using that technology. Then the rebuttal will be, well it's government CGi it's stuff no one else has so it's different and the goalpost get's moved and moved to the point where youre like ''C'mon...instead of doing all this....wouldn't it have just be easier and cheaper overall to just....go to the moon?" I think what it is is, when these conspiracies came out they were alot more easier to believe because not that much stuff existed about space travel so you could believe anything about it, especially due to the cold war, thus the conspiracies sounded plausible and simple, now we have so much information, so many videos, from space walks, to people like me watching columbia go up and re-enter, to videos like this and even simple DIYS experiments you can conduct tomorrow that can prove we went to the moon...should you have the equipment and know how. You can use your own radio, to not only track but speak to people on the International Space Station, YOUR radio, not NASA's, not some goverment hood's radio, but yours, you wouldn't lie to yourself would you? So calculate the distance on that radio signal, determine if it's anywhere on Earth or where it's coming from. After a while far more things point to this being true than against it unless you're willing to believe in almost magical elements of time and space to maintain that it's not true. Everything that happens isn't what it seems. The government lie about alot of things, but that also doesn't mean that everything HAS to be a conspiracy because of this. Some things really are just as they are you have to ask yourself the motives behind why some people believe in these conspiracies'. At 38 years old, I've found over the years that people who often believe in these conspiracies about things not being true in space usually don't WANT these things about Space to be true, usually because of a religious belief or mistrust of the government. You're setting yourself up for failure when you're expecting to find the very ghost you're looking for.

[@johncampbell4389]

The slow roll was “rotisserie mode”, and, post 11, the S-IVB was used to make the. On ring for the seismometers on the surface. I was 15 when 11 landed on the moon and I stayed up all night to watch both astronauts strolling on the moon; I am happy to have been around to listen and watch this live.

[@JaredOwen]

Thanks for sharing John! I was born in 1989 so I missed all the fun😌 but now I get to learn about it.

[@randomboi5225]

​@@JaredOwen atleast you lived with the Space Shuttle :)

[@Adrian_Stone]

These videos are excellent. It's such a shame Discovery & NatGeo are so focused on reality TV horseshit these days when they could be producing quality content like this. Good job.

[@JaredOwen]

Thanks Adrian!

[@DANNY40379]

nicely done animation but totally bogus in reality (sadly)

[@jamesboyce9421]

shillslayer f

[@CONTACTLIGHTTOMMY]

Adrian Stone ---- The History Channel is now the f--king Pawn Stars channel. Lovely.

[@Andrew-wv7qp]

What annoys me about most current documentaries is they always seem to artificially pump up the drama. Apollo 11 had plenty of drama by itself, but one doc I saw kept hinting that Armstrong and Aldrin were in danger of running out of fuel and crashing on the moon. They weren't. They were running up against the abort limit, which included a way to return to orbit. It was an extremely risky maneuver, yes, but not in the recklessly dangerous way suggested by the documentary

[@mandirasarkar-qg9nv]

Hey Jared! Just wanna convey my gratitude. Your videos are helping me a lot in my school works, even after 7 years you posted it on KZbin. Explained in a simple language ❤❤❤

[@jhogan1960]

Very well done. I am 58, and it is hard to believe this was half a century ago.

[@heirofrohan7865]

@Texasforever So, do you support the Flat Earth Society? I feel like you do

[@GuiTheBest889]

@Texasforever seems you got foolded real hard

[@davidsandall]

It's completely unbelievable.

[@abababab123456]

But not possible today 😀😀😀😀😀😭😭😭???

[@twn5858]

It never happened. It's all fantasy.

[@alexbriges2403]

The explanation achieved with those three videos is brilliantly simply. With no doubt one of the biggest human adventure ever .Thanks for this work ! Well done

[@JaredOwen]

Thanks Alex

[@jamesfarrell8339]

I have watched these three videos at least 10 time's and I find something new every time. I was in school during these missions and it was a very big deal when they happened but no one has ever broken it down the way you have. A incredible video. Thank you for putting it together. I have to be honest even though I knew how the story ended I was in suspense watching your video because I didn't know how many things could have gone wrong during some very complex manovers. Concidering that they were using technology from the 1960s. Great job I really learned a lot watching your videos.

[@spearhead787]

I like your comment. James.👍 Just one thing though,the technology used was the "cutting edge" at the time. The absolute zenith in fact. 😊

[@CrushacatEntertainmentandmore]

@shillslayer your incredibly stupid

[@dat1pengu1n]

@shillslayer proof that its cgi? no

[@dat1pengu1n]

@shillslayer its not cgi

[@cynicalnews963]

@shillslayer I beg to differ. Realistic CGI didn't exist until 1973 with the release of the movie "Westworld." CGI didn't go 3D until 3 years later in 1976, with the movie's sequel "Futureworld." The first moon landing happened at 3:17 P.M. EST on July 20th, 1969. I'd argue that you're the incredibly stupid one.

[@PunmasterSTP]

Lunar descent? More like “These videos are so much more than decent!” The quality of these animations is really mind-blowing.

[@monitor1862]

I was 8 when Apollo 11 landed on the moon. These videos are great, thank you making them!

[@erikperik1671]

Reminds me of Kerbal space Programm :) I love your videos. Animations and speech are perfect. Please continue your good work! Greetings from Germany.

[@JaredOwen]

Thanks Erik! Greetings from the United States

[@blockblock5193]

Jared Owen I LOVE APOLLO I HAVE A AMAZING TOY OF THE SATURN V

[@sandeepkalyan3326]

Even a layman can understand such complex topics in a simple manner. Thank you verymuch Jared for your great work.

[@SuperTejus]

This is so informative. Great work

[@ZenDriveSeven]

Brilliant explanation! Thanks for breaking it down step by step!

[@glenkeating7333]

Great videos! I'm 58 years old and I have learned a few things about the Apollo missions from your videos. I watched the Apollo 11 landing live! Keep up the good work! Cheers from Stephenville, Newfoundland, Canada.

[@yoleneclement9086]

I'm currently reading Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir and this video just helped me understand one of the reference for a maneuver. Thank you for your work, it's incredibly detailed and beautiful.

[@eliaspeter7689]

That's a great book.

[@avlr1232]

Wow, I have been a long time viewer and years later I can’t get over how amazing your videos are! Thank you so much for making them and wish you a good day 😊

[@eagleman5169]

dang, stayed in parking orbit for too long got a ticket

[@SpitSharp]

Parking ticket

[@shingojira6612]

*You then realise your spacecraft is starting to get towed down back to earth by an unseen force*

[@Emlif]

Well portal 2s space core warned us "here comes the space cops"

[@Exoblix]

Get out.

[@marclucky5210]

@@shingojira6612 Dancing coffin: Ok, get in

[@shecanatakeitcaptain]

If you read the book "Carrying the Fire" by Michael Collins, you learn that the passive thermal roll during the coast to and from the moon, was carried out in the vertical position and not in the horizontal alignment you might expect. It's a tiny detail most technical Apollo documentaries get wrong.

[@TheMrSuge]

Well that assumes they really did go to the Moon.

[@XxOwlStealer69xX]

@@TheMrSuge which they did, if you're gonna deny the moon landing why the hell are you watching a video about it?

[@sebastianriz4703]

​@@TheMrSugeThey did.

[@Bjowolf2]

@@TheMrSuge 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

[@enterprisevi4440]

You are absolutely the greatest youtuber in my whole subscribers

[@JaredOwen]

😁

[@alexanderley1027]

Hi Jared, all three animations are amazing. Wonderful work and so well explained. Could be useful for schools, universities or just someone who is interested in the Apollo missions. Thanks a lot! Best, Alex

[@bernardhossmoto]

Another perfect animation and explanation video. Thanks, again.

[@JaredOwen]

Your welcome!

[@georgeevangel4292]

@@JaredOwen 400,000 people worked on getting a man to the moon,Thanks to John F Kennedy My uncle was one of them,helpede design the LEM Today his name is on the moon along with other engineers

[@Mark-yb1sp]

Jared, this was awesome. The graphics were killer. Keep up the good work.

[@JaredOwen]

Thank you!

[@goonerjake4021]

Wonderful. Those who say we never went to the moon just don’t understand. By that I don’t mean physics and maths. I don’t have a great knowledge of them. What I do know is that people who are well read can use them to do great things like the above. What these conspiracy folks don’t understand is that for these clever people, working these things out is not out of the question. It’s just a set of calculations to work out.

[@mako88sb]

Yes, well said. Even more important is that it would have been impossible to fake everything involved with the Apollo landings never mind keeping a hoax of that magnitude quiet.

[@WTRMLN-zu6ob]

Its impossible to fake project that enormous, people from all countries(not 3rd world) worked on it, someone would already talk about it

[@davidsandall]

@@WTRMLN-zu6ob it's not impossible to fake worldwide lies. The few people that own the world and a few well paid actors are the only ones who have to know. They also own the media and thats where you get your info. You probably believe we landed on Mars from watching a self admitted cgi.

[@WTRMLN-zu6ob]

@@davidsandall lmao nigga go touch some grass

[@Mark-Wilson]

ikr the ykeepd enying it frogetting the engineering the math the science that went inot this the months of planning the bulding and the aboslute work that went intot his was INSANE ye tpeople deny it ever happened cus of their big egos

[@johnmehaffey9953]

I stayed up all night to watch Neil and buzz make history, I was 20 years old and so glad I stayed awake to see history being made and I've always been amazed by the Saturn 5 rocket the power that it produced and 3 men sitting on top of it van Braun certainly knew how to build rockets and it was his goal to send men into orbit and then onto the moon and beyond he died about 6 years after the moon landing but left a legacy behind him

[@NiajMorshed]

So nice and calm explanation. Just loved the videos. Anyone without any astronomical knowledge will understand these. Thanks.

[@gumersindok]

great animation!

[@commenter9590]

Alchemica Blackwood Thats big words for someone who is fooled by a Mark sargeant

[@ismaellopez3963]

@Alchemica Blackwood you have no brain. The reason you don't believe we went to the Moon is because you don't do any research, the fact that it happened 49 years ago, in 1969, which is long ago for most people. Many people can recall watching the Moon landings live on NBC, CBS, and ABC. This wasn't a Hollywood hoax, many have tried to copy the Moon landing, yet they failed.

[@-danR]

Yes, very neat, concise and clean. My only quibble is the J2 exhaust. You only get that color with alkane fuels, in the first stage (kerosene). LH2 burns blue or clear, with white condensation trail in the upper atmosphere. See Apollo 11 staging separation for comparison at time: 3;00 on kzbin.info/www/bejne/pmnJfZ15aMyBis0

[@thesauciestboss4039]

tubeist- dan while I do know the missions weren’t faked, you are literally the smartest conspiracy theorist here with the most “convincing” evidence. Props to you!

[@ronakpatidar2307]

@@ismaellopez3963 nasa is unable to provide clarification to russian scientists regarding moon landing ,fake landing

[@bapples1233]

Extremely nice animation, you explained everything, this is very cool! 👍🏼

[@JaredOwen]

Thank you!

[@rharutyunyan]

What an amazing video!!! loved it! Everything is clear with clean animation!!! Please bring more of these. Thank you!!!

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

Just thinking about how in Kerbal Space Program crashing on the moon is a major achievement. Then the magnitude of this becomes even greater...

[@earth7440]

John Edwards but we went to the moon you 1 year old

[@KingBoomBox]

@@earth7440 Nah he a fetus.

[@heirofrohan7865]

@John Edwards Please get off the internet.

[@heirofrohan7865]

@Dashing Johnny hi, Chinese here.

[@ismaila2668]

@Dashing Johnny your stupidity is painful

[@themainproblem]

This a great video effort! Nicely done. You sound fairly young so I'm really glad to see a younger person so interested in this. I lived through it all and am still awed by it.

[@JaredOwen]

Thank you very much! I love this kind of stuff - in the future I might make more videos on the Apollo Spacecraft. It's a lot of fun to learn about.

[@bizzjoe]

You are awed by a fake nonsense moon landing?

[@mikeparker5008]

I guess..you just don't get it, Scahoni. I'm sorry about that. Maybe there's a future for you in...janitorial work, or something....

[@bizzjoe]

The moon is almost a quarter of a million miles away .. just really think about that for a minute .. try to comprehend.

[@terrariola]

@@bizzjoe That's why it took a 1 billion dollar rocket to launch one mission, and nearly a decade of development & testing.

[@UnknownKnower2]

This one of the most amazing videos on youtube.

[@georgeevangel4292]

My uncle worked on the Lunar excursion module Bethpage Long Island All this talk of moon landing being a hoax is bullshit.He worked on it for years

[@georgeevangel4292]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! Your an asshole The moon landing was not a hoax.How do you explain all the technology we got from it?

[@prolinelectricful]

Ya amazing how stupid people are that believe such nonsense!!

[@occamsrayzor]

These videos are excellent! They are beautifully animated and clearly explained - well done. There will always be idiots, but for those with brains, especially younger ones who were not around to experience this first-hand, these are a really good introduction to the facts.

[@robertkimberley3736]

It's too short with lots of unanswered questions for an old timer like me. The module is too small to hold everything they supposedly took.

[@joshuaomer9644]

@@robertkimberley3736 What do you think they "supposedly" took that wouldn't fit with them?

[@LOSTONITALL]

you are a good lap dog

[@frustratid1230]

@Noelle Leger you said that on comment another

[@waynejunior6480]

@@joshuaomer9644 fuel, a buggy, cameras, rocks, food, batteries, flags, oxygen, wireless radios that wasn't out yet, big heavy suits that withstand -250f to 250f. And something for sea sickness since they barrell rolled for 3 days covering 220,000 miles with less fuel that a Ford fiesta.

[@diggie72]

Wow. Just wow. The amount of time and effort it must have taken to make this. Thank you.

[@Star-Explorers]

LM (3:22) can also be referred to as LEM ( Lunar Excursion Module). That's where the word "lem" comes from. Does it matter...no. But it's nice to know in case someone ever asks. :)

[@Woody615]

Originally it was referred to as the LEM, but in the early 1960s, NASA officially changed it to LM and it was never referred to as LEM again. However, you are correct that's where "lem" comes from and much to NASA's chagrin, LEM is still around.

[@KayoMichiels]

Yeah.. but some dropped the excursion part of the name because it sounded like a school trip.

[@advancedtv1110]

Yes just like "Jeep" from GP (General Purpose) military vehicle at 2nd WW.

[@elnico5623]

As @@Woody615 said first it was *named* LEM, later renamed LM but still pronounced "lem"

[@MrT------5743]

Kinda like the VAB, was originally called the Vertical Assembly Building but changed to Vehicle Assembly Building when it was foretasted to be used for other spacecraft too.

[@maxpayne2574]

Yes we really landed on the moon at great effort and risk. It's unfortunate so much of the internet is dedicated to spreading lies.

[@iranoutofusernameideas7438]

Dedicated to spreading lies about a fake moon landing

[@TheKaiser-pf8fr]

@@iranoutofusernameideas7438do you have ANY proof whatsoever?

[@iranoutofusernameideas7438]

@@TheKaiser-pf8fr Look at close ups of the LM. It looks like a childs science project

[@msidc1238]

​@@iranoutofusernameideas7438It really doesn't though.

[@iranoutofusernameideas7438]

@@msidc1238 Literally duck tape and aluminum

[@tomanderson848]

My new favorite internet site. Thank you very much for your hard work!

[@stcentury-ns3zy]

Perhaps the apollo 13 mission would be an interesting story to tell.

[@rajasekharbajagaku4748]

One of the best videos I have watched ...that explains the whole process clearly ..thanks

[@gbzorro]

I too like a well-crafted piece of science fiction.

[@FrankyPi]

@@gbzorro ignorant idiot

[@boucharafouoba2404]

Mission engineers are geniuses. In any case superb video

[@alexabadi7458]

Great job ! Thank you !

[@notionSunday]

Well done!

[@tattiersam]

Ed

[@andreizadasilvapereira5312]

To Part 3!

[@janakmatharu2446]

notionSunday boogpojlhbjlgv

[@LOSTONITALL]

you are a good lap dog

[@Pilot.Lindsay]

Thanks. These Videos are Awesome. I was 15 years old when they went the first time. It is so cool to have it explain with your animation Videos. I will watch them all. Thanks. 👍

[@JaredOwen]

Thanks you John!

[@Drew791]

Wow you did an excellent thorough job on this video. Anyone can understand these events thanks to you 🙏🏻

[@danclark1348]

I watched it live. I was age 14. We were allowed to stay up past bedtime for that event. 😊🚀🌎🌕🔭

[@davester5234]

Dan Clark if only I could see it, it would be amazing

[@WTRMLN-zu6ob]

I hope I will experience the same when SpaceX go to moon, or mars

[@lotharluder2743]

Me too....the pitty now I have some doubts about that Show. I hate it. Before the world was more comfortable fore me.

[@camtron0]

Thanks @JaredOwen My 3 year old son and I love your videos. Particularly the ones about space vehicles like the soyuz and space shuttle and Saturn V. I've learned a lot of details I hadn't heard anywhere else. Thanks for teaching us things. Cheers

[@JaredOwen]

Thank you so much Cameron! I'm glad you guys enjoy watching them together!

[@DestroyerWill]

Thanks very informative

[@oatlord]

Staying in the command module alone must have been an unique experience.

[@theravedaddy]

Best time to crack 1 off without being heard tho....

[@randysmith4331]

The CM pilot kept busy doing his own tasks, like running systems checks, mapping the moon’s surface, prepping the CM for docking procedures, keeping in contact with mission control, and anything else to keep from boredom.

[@murphy10fs]

Thanks for doing this video. One of the best I've seen that explains the Apollo missions. Love it.

[@JaredOwen]

Thank you!

[@federicoolz]

God bless America, for science!

[@yusufabdurrauf7429]

Science-fiction.. not pure science....

[@stevek8829]

I was 18 at the time and had watched launches since my fifth grade teacher brought in her own b&w portable to watch Shepard's first flight. It was gripping and we knew what was at stake in this deadly war. Everyone on earth that could, watched those brave men take off on July 16, 1969. We all knew it was as real as all the earlier flights. It was palpable in the air. You could feel it. Their bravery was greater than balls which implies mere testosterone. It was heart. If some uneducated millenials want to claim it was fake, go ahead. I understand their jealousy. When giants blasted off to the moon! What a day. Thank you God for letting it cross my lifespan.

[@lukestrawwalker]

Yeah, too many idiots in the world with flat-Earth thinking... "It MUST be fake, because I can't possibly understand it or comprehend it or how it worked... " Just like the "must've been aliens that built the pyramids" crowd... Oh well... history repeats itself. I guess Dark Age idiots who tore blocks off ancient Rome's structures to build goat pens for their animals thought the same way... Later! OL J R :)

[@Sednas]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! You still have the burden of proof lying on your head

[@lannliu4555]

Thank you so much for the video! My daughter (5) asked me how did Apollo landed on the moon. I couldn’t answer that even though I’m a physicist (condensed matter)... Came cross your video while researching her question- can hardly describe my gratitude! Well, Thanks!

[@Shayzy]

There’s probably a conspiracy theorist out there who thinks this is fake, the CGI in 1980 and stuff was horrible! How dumb can people be?

[@veryepicplaneboi1674]

Remeber king kong

[@israelpartisan9927]

The CGI in 1960 was even worse, when Apollo happened.

[@bennybooboobear3940]

@@israelpartisan9927 they don’t say it’s cgi. They say it was just a sound stage. Idiots.I literally can’t believe how people think this way?! Like...what?!

[@hamburgerhamburger4064]

@@israelpartisan9927 cgi in 1969 was so bat it didn’t exist yet

[@davidsandall]

To believe this all happened with zero practice is foolish. That tweaker rei tent never went anywhere.

[@stevin47]

how do they get from the capsule to the lander with locking mech on the door

[@JaredOwen]

Good question! To be honest I haven't dug that deep. I might do another video on the internals of the Apollo spacecraft.

[@mako88sb]

A collapsible docking probe. www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/CSM11_Docking_Subsystem_pp87-92.pdf

[@lukestrawwalker]

The docking probe and drogue setup was some brilliant engineering. It consisted of a pointed "probe" that was attached to the front of the Command Module inside the docking tunnel, just above the inside hatch at the top of the CM below the instrument panel. This probe stuck out the front and contained a cone at its tip with three spring-loaded latches that engaged with the passive "drogue", which was basically a metal cone with a hole in the center, much like a "cone of shame" the vet puts on your dog to keep them from licking themselves after a medical procedure. The drogue was installed in the top of the LM's airlock tunnel with three tongue-n-groove latches in a "twist-lock" arrangement sorta like a gas cap on a car. When the probe entered the drogue, it would slide down the length of the interior of the cone until it hit the bottom, at which point the tip of the probe was inside the hole of the cone, and the spring loaded latches would snap out and lock above the lip of the cone's hole, creating the "soft dock" of the two spacecraft. Then the probe would be hydraulically retracted by a switch, pulling the two spacecraft together until the mating surfaces of the docking tunnel on the two spacecraft touched, at which point a series of spring-loaded latches around the interior of the tunnel would snap into place, locking the two spacecraft together in what was called "hard dock". Then the two docked spacecraft would have the tunnel filled with air via controls inside the CM, until the pressure equalized between the tunnel and the CM cabin, which meant equal air pressure on both sides of the CM upper hatch into the tunnel. The hatch would then be opened from inside the CM, exposing the base of the probe mechanism, which was attached to the walls of the tunnel with three clamps. The probe was unlatched and retracted, and then folded up and stowed with the hatch inside the CM storage bay under the seats. The tunnel was now partially open with the docking probe out of the way, and the astronauts would enter the tunnel, release the locks, give the drogue a twist, and remove the drogue cone from the docking tunnel, which exposed the LM's top hatch. A pressure equalization valve on the hatch would be opened to equalize the air pressure between the CM, the tunnel, and the LM cabin, and allow the LM top hatch to be opened from the tunnel side. This completed the docking procedures and allowed access from the CM to the LM. Before the LM undocked to go down to the Moon, the same procedure was reversed-- the LM astronauts transferred over to the LM, and they installed the drogue in their side of the tunnel at the top of the LM. The CM pilot installed the probe in the tunnel on the Command Module side of the tunnel, and locked it in place. The LM had its hatch closed, and the CMP installed the hatch on the CM, the tunnel was depressurized (air bled out into space) and checked for leaks of the CM and LM hatches, once they were verified to have good seals, the hard dock latches would retract and the two vehicles would separate. When they docked again after the lunar landing, the same procedure would occur to achieve soft dock, hard dock, tunnel pressurization, seal verification between the two spacecraft, then open the hatches on both the LM and CSM, and remove the probe and drogue to clear the tunnel, transfer cargo and crew from the LM for the final time, then close up the hatches for the last time, depressurize the tunnel to remove the load (compressed air in the tunnel pushing against the hatches and walls, pulling against the hard dock latches) from the hard dock latches, then the hard dock latches were retracted, separating the LM for the last time. The CM and LM would then maneuver apart, with the LM later commanded to crash into the Moon or left in a decaying orbit (though the Apollo 10 LM is still drifting along Earth's orbit behind Earth in a permanent (we think) solar orbit, where it's been since early '69...) The CSM then returned to Earth, with its probe stowed in the lower equipment bay, since it was no longer needed with nothing left to dock to, and where it would be safely out of the way of the parachute risers when the chutes deployed after reentry... On Apollo 14, (IIRC) they nearly had to scrub the mission because for whatever reason, the three spring-loaded latches on the tip of the probe would NOT latch into the hole of the drogue in the LM to create the capture and soft dock, which is of course necessary to be able to lock the two spacecraft together for the probe to "retract" and pull them together in the proper alignment for the tunnel latches to be locked in to create "hard dock". They attempted several times and were running low on docking fuel, Mission Control finally told them to "ram it in" more or less and hit the LM drogue more forcefully, which dislodged whatever bit of dirt of whatever that was keeping the latches from snapping out into the hole of the drogue, which allowed them to snap out and lock the two spacecraft together so they could retract and "hard dock" the two vehicles. Had this NOT worked, the CSM would have eventually used up all allocated docking propellant, and would have had to abort the LM docking and extraction from the S-IVB, and simply either conducted a lunar-orbit only mission, or abort the mission entirely and return to Earth... either through the free-return trajectory or by direct abort. Once docked, the crew removed the probe and inspected it closely, and found only a bit of dirt or something that they thought was keeping the latches from working properly... of course it worked properly for their return from the Moon, as they figured it would. Had it failed a second time, the crew COULD have transferred back to the CSM in their suits via EVA between the two spacecraft flying in close formation... which is how the Soviets planned to retrieve their single moonwalker from their lunar lander after his mission-- they couldn't spare the weight of a pressurized or reusable docking tunnel system and probe-n-drogue, so they basically topped their LM with a "dart board" and the top of their lunar Soyuz would have had essentially a spear or harpoon sticking out the top, which when the two spacecraft were brought together would spear through the "dartboard" on the LK lunar lander, "locking" the two vehicles together in close proximity-- the cosmonaut would then open his side hatch of the LK lander, climb out into open space with his box of rocks, film, and cameras, and then spacewalk over to the awaiting "lunar Soyuz" using handholds, meet his fellow cosmonaut from the Soyuz at its open hatch, transfer the payload inside, and then enter the lunar Soyuz and close the hatch. The LK lander would then be discarded with explosive bolts on the spear or harpoon that would jettison it and the LK lander so they could depart lunar orbit for Earth. Their lunar spacecraft would remain attached to the rocket stage for the trip to the Moon until it was in Low Lunar Orbit (LLO) and then one of the two cosmonauts aboard would transfer via spacewalk down the length of the "lunar Soyuz" into the LK lander, opening its single side hatch from outside. He would then descend alone to the lunar surface, while his crewmate remained in lunar orbit in the spacecraft "mother ship". Later! OL J R :)

[@Sednas]

@Mr Sunshines hahaha you clearly don't know how complicated spacecraft is.

[@mauriciodenardipeterlevitz3694]

Lunar landing described is an easy way . Best ever regarding to this subject. Congrats

[@standoughope]

If any of you have HBO and haven't seen the "From the Earth to the Moon" series, do it!!! It's fantastic, trust me.

[@MaynardGKrebs-gv4vy]

It really is. I've had it for YEARS.

[@in7minutesorless]

#notspon

[@dansv1]

When looking at the diagram at 2:00 keep in mind that the moon is 30 earth diameters away from the earth.

[@koolgame224]

Dan Severns it’s not to scale, he animated it out of scale for easy seeing.

[@dansv1]

Koolgame22 That is exactly why I made the comment.

[@cynicalnews963]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! He later showed it being to scale. P.S.: The fact that you need to look up a video explaining the Apollo program to hate on everyone about how it's all lies is pathetic. Say, have you ever been to Huntsville, where three Saturn Vs are out in the open for the world to see? Or to Houston, where there's a fourth? How about all the literal rocks from the moon in museums around the globe? I've been to the exact spot in the New Mexico desert where an Apollo capsule first tested in 1964. I can see why you would think the Apollo missions were fakery since nobody's been there in _your teensy little lifetime,_ but we'll be going back there in 5 years time, and this time you'll be able to see your precious stars on the "backdrop", since we've invented dual-exposure cameras since. Also keep in mind that CGI was in its infancy when Apollo missions were going to the moon, and cameras weren't high enough FPS that they could be slowed down just yet... The fact that you think it is necessary to deny the existence of the greatest technological acheivement in human history, which caused the deaths of three people and contributed to the collapse of the largest nation in the world, is simply despicable. PPS: Here are my sources, none are government- or NASA-sourced before you claim so. Care to list yours? Early CGI: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYGwd5uZeJmGrLM Apollo 11 footage for cross-reference, here you can also see how a filter is applied to the camera so that the flare of the white and reflective powdery ground doesn't drown out everything else, illustrating firsthand why the stars aren't visible, also how Neil Armstrong's first statement was misheard: kzbin.info/www/bejne/nZiYf5aZbqyCers White Sands, New Mexico, where the first Apollo tests took place: www.google.com/maps/place/NASA+-+White+Sands+Test+Facility/@32.5056285,-106.6126188,15z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x8cb0a9a72d4fc733!8m2!3d32.5056285!4d-106.6126188 Saturn rockets in Huntsville, AL at the USSRC: www.rocketcenter.com/museum Apollo 1 disaster: airandspace.si.edu/explore-and-learn/topics/apollo/apollo-program/orbital-missions/apollo1.cfm

[@mauricioc.p.nobrega2167]

Outstanding work ! Excellent video and fantastic animation and explanations !

[@connorconnor2421]

0:13 Congratulations! You've learned to teleport. Welcome to the club. You are a superhero. But superheros are... boring. They just go and save a few lives or whatever. You can do so much better than that. Here, is how to take over the world! *Your Superpowers and You* *Episode 8: Teleportation, Uses and Abuses*

[@efanjul5768]

Mistake in animation: The spacecraft didn't leave Earth Orbit off the Equator, but further North, to avoid the worst part of the Van Allen Belt.

[@MNEKfamily]

Shut up old man,It is not easy to animate

[@ORGANIZEDCoNfUsioN]

Jared expanded this so well, now I get it. Thank you.

[@JaredOwen]

😁

[@randomguy-jd8su]

1:17 you mean fairings?

[@cheesebusiness]

Your life is like the astronaut in the CSM who flies to the moon but doesn’t land it

[@ChrisCooper312]

They were all very happy to do that job, in fact most of them asked for the job. Not only was in an important part of the whole mission, requiring very skilled pilots (they had to be able to work alone, including potentially flying down to "collect" the LM if it could take off but not get into a high enough orbit, or back to earth on their own if there was a problem with the LM that stranded them on the moon), but it also put them on rotation to command a later mission. As it was though, the Apollo program was cancelled before any of the CMs from the moon landing missions got a command (Collins could have, most likely on Apollo 17 but chose not to). Jim Lovel (Apollo 8 CMP), Dave Scott (Apollo 9 CMP) and John Young (Apollo 10 CMP) all did command later missions and walk on the moon. Ken Mattingly (Apollo 13 CMP, put back to 16 due to German Measles risk) went on to command two Space Shuttle missions.

[@RobertJones-ux6nc]

I remember watching Mercury, Gemini, & Apollo missions as a child. And seeing a man ( Neil Armstrong) take his first steps while Aldren waited and Collins orbited the moon.

[@damomguy2801]

Imagine being a guy just search in youtube "how astronauts land on moon" just to call it fake

[@LocoFompi]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! So you are one of those morons... All your data is based on guys without any real knowledge of rocket engineering, but you believe them. Funny.

[@anamarte9859]

Oiled Up And Ready ! They used magnetic tapes hence how it survived

[@LocoFompi]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! Haha... Rocket engineering is one career that you can study. Let us know when the teacher say "we have something to tell you that you can't share with anybody".

[@LocoFompi]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! Poor little boy! You need to deny the entire reality to feel yourself special. Have you ever try by getting into an university? Perhaps you'll find a nice way to train your brain, instead believing scummers.

[@LocoFompi]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! So, where did you got your knowledge?

[@timothyortiz2222]

They are standing 🧍‍♂️ upright during LM landing to be able to see out the small windows. Weight savings.

[@roomofidiots]

Great video! Excellent work! Its astounding that people came up with all this in the 50s and 60s.

[@zikiardani7277]

"Thats one small step for man!"

[@Chuked]

ziki ardani “One big step for mankind”

[@Sednas]

@@Chuked "one giant leap for mankind"*

[@foreverbooked2964]

@@Chuked damn you got it so wrong

[@kurtknis8726]

HUSTON TRANQUILIZER HIRE THE EAGLE HAS LANDED

[@cynicalnews963]

@@foreverbooked2964 "That's one small step for a man... one giant leap for mankind." Anyone who says otherwise doesn't quite know their stuff. Not to mention before he said that he was talking about "how the moon dust adheres to the sides and soles of my boot like powdered charcoal," so One Small Step is obviously not even the first thing he said.

[@owi2kd9dwj2ka9]

Imagine if you do dis without infinite fuel and unbreaking parts "Made on earth by humans"

[@NHAFFFF]

How do you like 1.5

[@owi2kd9dwj2ka9]

Its nice

[@aawqaq620]

I know the reference but i wouldnt tell the game

[@owi2kd9dwj2ka9]

@@aawqaq620 XD

[@aawqaq620]

@@owi2kd9dwj2ka9 when you can't stop the fast timer so you miss it

[@nat.serrano]

Amazing video. Probably in my top 5 of youtube.

[@hannesackerl8918]

hi jared, perfectly made and very useful! well done - everybody should watch this, coz. science is very important!

[@L2ggs]

So the landing sites will always be there, along with the rovers and all the other gear. In maybe 50 years time, when travel to the moon is commonplace, people will be able to go and see the original landing sites for themselves. What's funny is that the comments from the moon hoaxers will also still be here on the internet, and people will be able to look back and see just how dumb those people are for thinking such a legendary achievement is "fake".

[@neilbishop1686]

Then the hoax will be that..NASA and Hollywood set up their faked movie sets on the Moon...the hand is quicker then the eye ....

[@earth7440]

Neil Bishop how the hell do you launch all that Stuff on secret. And create human footprints and make everything 50 years old ya dofus

[@johnaugsburger6192]

@@neilbishop1686 You're a moron piece of shit.

[@AdviceBro]

Sadly, they are not there anymore, the telescopes from earth are good enough to be able to see but there is nothing there.

[@tylerkidd9320]

you all missed the joke

[@66tas95]

Let's just check that telemetry data, oh wait!! we can't its gone missing. Okay who took out the trash last????

[@qotda]

Donald Trump space force, destined for yavin to enslave the kel dor masters 2220

[@LOSTONITALL]

@@colinsouthern you are a good lap dog

[@blockblock5193]

Thats what she said. HAHAHA

[@ohger1]

What a brainless stooge.. If this was faked, do you really think it would be harder to fake telemetry data than the photographic and video evidence not to mention the moon rocks? All NASA would have to do is present a few reels of old tape - tape that no machine in the world can read anymore. And if you really must see telemetry data you don't have the brains to understand, ask the Russians. They were monitoring Apollo just as closely as NASA did. There's a good chance they have their copies..

[@fairwinds610]

@@colinsouthern Hi! I just noticed that Noelle Leger has apparently deleted all of his/her comments; all we can see are your knowledgeable replies. Odd, that.

[@rochditidjani]

Excellent video. Very good step by step graphics that show many things I didn't know about. Good work.

[@joseluisfernandez4063]

Excepto como pasan del modulo de mando al LEM y viceversa. Conectando su mochila de vida de uno a otro por dos veces. Es tan increible que nunca lo vemos ni en dibujo animado.

[@m1legend496]

So this is how complicated the trip to Moon and some says it's just a conspiracy theory and a CGI

[@mako88sb]

Yes, it certainly was pretty complicated. It really is quite amazing how much was accomplished in such a short period of time. In a few short years the USA went from relatively small and simple rockets that had launch failure rates as high as 40% to the Saturn V with a 100% successful launch rate. Pretty amazing considering it was the most complicated machine at the time to be successfully launched. Even the Saturn 1’s & 1B’s had 100% successful launches even though the people involved with designing them expected half to fail. Gives you some idea about the caliber of the people involved with the whole program.

[@m1legend496]

@@mako88sb I don't need your comment

[@catgirl_ava]

Rip Michael Collins

[@Disposer962]

This is Useful for KSP!

[@wracatinthevoid]

THE MISSION IS REAL IF ANYONE SAID THIS IS FAKE THEN IGNORE THEM

[@AllThingsGreat2799]

I believe you because the moon landingmis real, still can't believe there's people saying it's fake, after nearly 50 years, get over it

[@Superilianutul]

Bro chill

[@leosefcik]

And they did that all with a on-board computer less powerful than your mobile phone.

[@joevignolor4u949]

If you are interested in the Apollo guidance computer watch this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rqmafZmearh-i7M

[@joevignolor4u949]

@Bob Dillahunty If you are interested in the Apollo guidance computer watch this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rqmafZmearh-i7M

[@ohger1]

Which was it's advantage. A cell phone computer is vastly superior to the Apollo, but the Apollo computer was built for one task which rendered it almost crash proof.

[@alexsiemers7898]

John-Del and the lack of complexity also made it less prone to radiation damage. That’s why spacecraft guidance computers today still use computers from at least 20 years ago.

[@stevengalloway8052]

Thank you for this video. It may be the best explanation about the moon landings I've ever seen... 🌚🌎

[@JaredOwen]

Thanks Steven - glad you like it

[@astrokid7664]

I love how you explain and quote several times "this is not to scale" i kept thinking to myself, "yeah the average kindergartener should know this". Seems I had forgotten to take into account the existence of flat Earthers 😆😆😆🤣 . Anyways I love your channel Mr. Owen keep up the great work.

[@georgeevangel4292]

If it weren't for Werner Von Braun we wouldn't have a space program

[@christianege4989]

There would surely be a space program without him. The only difference would be that there would be a soviet flag in the moon, and the conspiracy idiots would claim that the landings were filmed in a secret KGB facility somewhere in siberia.

[@STho205]

If it weren't for Robert Goddard, von Braun would have never built a ballistic missle (he said that). If it weren't for Issac Newton and 18/19th century chemists and fluid engineers, Robert Goddard would have never gotten into the air with liquid fuel, If it wasn't for the Army Air Corps and NACAs high manned ballon flights in the 30s-60s Redstone, Atlas and Saturn stacks wouldn't have carried humans in the 60s...

[@georgeevangel4292]

@@STho205 My sentiments exactly Treaty for Versaqilles had a loophole which allowed for rocket research

[@AnthonyBlando]

Hey, Jered great video... I have been watching the "What We Say Videos" This video tied it all together for me.

[@BillPalmer]

Of course the rover didn’t show up until later missions.

[@muhamadhzz]

There are lots of creators with trash contents, that have more than twice your subs count. It's kinda sad actually :(

[@trysomethingnew3950]

It was really a nice animation and your explaination was too good . Thanks for this video

[@dannysunwantedopinions]

I’m guessing there was a little bit of math involved in this endeavor?

[@jimberglund6979]

Nothing a trusty slide rule can't handle!

[@stephenpage-murray7226]

Lots, and big ground based mainframes.

[@KukosEQ]

Would be great if some telemetry was presented, like speed, acceleration, mass, etc.

[@TonyBraun]

lost

[@tedcarriker3293]

Heart rates, control maneuvers and maybe a friggen film of Earth rotation... another opportunity lost.

[@YDDES]

”Earth rotation”? Earth spins Twice as slow as the hourhand on a clock....

[@YDDES]

What would you do with that information?

[@YDDES]

What would you do with that information?

[@jonwatson654]

This is so well explained. Great job Jared.

[@veerendrasingh769]

Who is here after chadrayan 2

[@Chuked]

Veerendra Singh so that was a fucking lie

[@fixedstationary1719]

Learn more amazing Moon facts in the documentary: “A Funny Thing Happened On The way to the Moon” It is packed full with interesting fun Moon info and facts you may not have heard about. Also check out "Astronauts Gone wild". This one shows viewers how brave and courageous our NASA heroes are for accepting such dangerous challenges. These two documentaries are MUST SEE TV and can both be found here on KZbin.

[@fixedstationary1719]

I can't imagine what it would be like, to be so gullable that I'd believe such total hogwash, the way 98% of the world does. There are at least 100 provable facts that no human has ever set foot on the moon. It's the biggest lie ever told, and most people have no idea. What a sad reality. Just look into it, even a slight look shows the evidence is everywhere, that it never happened.

[@jimmynobody8344]

Jeez. That video has been debunked to death. It's full of outright lies. Siebrel edited actual footage to try to make his claims seem true.

[@jimmynobody8344]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! give it up. You guys have had 50 years to come up with evidence, and to this day, that ridiculous siebrel video is the thing I hear about most from hoaxers. It takes just a little research to prove he made up his claims. It just goes to show how easily duped you guys are. I dont even really care about NASA. I just like watching conspiracy nuts make fools of themselves. I bet the moon landing isnt the only conspiracy you believe in. Paid mass shills? Ha. You are sad.

[@jimmynobody8344]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! if theres so much evidence against the moon landings, then why are you defending an obvious fraud video. Shouldn't you be against people like siebrel for making up false claims.

[@jimmynobody8344]

@Oiled Up And Ready ! no its not. That footage was available to the public. Siebrel just found it and edited it to fit his claims. Theres no insert in the window. He just stopped the footage before they turned the lights back on. And he used audio from different footage. It didn't even look like the earth would look from low earth orbit anyway. So it was already a stupid claim.

[@ShaileshDagar]

A brilliant explanation. Thanks, Jared!

[@randomamericansoldier8586]

Did you know that the moon is far enough to fit all of the planet? I know this cuz I’m a nerd

[@pf8951]

Excellent, thanks for posting this.

[@dougsanford2887]

CARDBOARD AND CURTAIN RODS...... THE SECRET TO SPACE TRAVEL

[@teresa67factoid95]

Doug Sanford too funny. There is no way that mocked up pos cardboard and curtain rod lem, went anywhere near the moon once, never mind 6 times. Hoax.

[@qotda]

yep qui wan jinn

[@teresa67factoid95]

clyde8her you accuse me of being uneducated? Hardly. Physics denying I saw it on TV believing sheep like you believe that we went to the moon and back six times dragging a car, and that aluminum airplanes can penetrate concrete and steel! Gullible and uneducated defines YOU. DUH!

[@teresa67factoid95]

clyde8her yes you have a master's degree. And I am Elvis.

[@BlueOvalEdge]

Too bad the US never went to the moon. Twitter told me so.

[@RocketPal]

Twitter 💀

[@wracatinthevoid]

dont believe it

[@BlueOvalEdge]

@@wracatinthevoid Wait. Twitter lied? Noooooo!!!!

[@musehivision1864]

People don't know satire theses days. smh. Thanks tRump.