This guy just explained an entire chapter on one of my modules in 15mins , compared to my useless prof and teaching assistant who couldn't do it with 3 lectures and 120 pages of notes . Hands down . Best . Tutor . Ever . Hats off to you Sir .
@theskeptic84895 жыл бұрын
lol
@theskeptic84895 жыл бұрын
They have to stretch the material out so they can keep their jobs. Online educations would destroy Universities.
@MSloCvideos4 жыл бұрын
What an oversimplified and ignorant worldview.
@stephenandrade55842 жыл бұрын
@@MSloCvideos Sad thing is he's right tho, for some classes (Like this one)
@Mauntium10 жыл бұрын
Very good video, just like the others, on the playlist! This line made me chuckle though: (5:20) "There are 26 successes in the population, the 26 females and 32 failures, the 32 men."
@kleemc5 жыл бұрын
Education needs to be totally revamped. We don't need so many professors giving lectures, one for each subject in every schools in the world. We just need a handful of great teachers creating online content per subject. Instead, we need lots of great coaches and mentors to help individual learners. Learners will watch online lectures at their own pace. Coaches and mentors will work with individual learners to guide them, introduce good learning resources, push them to achieve and most important of all, motivate them. That's the new model of education.
@fakatsa9252Ай бұрын
Actually that could be a way to progress, however while dealing with larger masses who are willing to have a tutor or professor(i bet 3/4 univeristy undergrads are willing to have) it would still be needed to create some kind of classes, and for classes you need halls, and that cluster of halls would be called universitt ahaim. So basically we would go on the same cycle, of course with small (compared to scale) changes. But the system is actually worth thinking.
@nimo22116 жыл бұрын
I've been having so much trouble with these concepts, especially because I am taking summer session and my professor teaches incredibly fast and is barely available for office hours. These videos have been helping me more than my professor in the last couple weeks! Thanks so much!
@jbstatistics6 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome!
@michipichu4 жыл бұрын
After watching all the previous videos in this series, I got all these answers right. Thanks for great instruction!
@francoisdutoit841910 жыл бұрын
Really great videos, you get straight to the point without losing the viewer, well done
@jbstatistics10 жыл бұрын
Thanks Francois.
@goodgoyim53096 жыл бұрын
When you have 14:51 minutes before an exam
@sushmitanigam49797 жыл бұрын
what a lecture. Just superb. whenever feel like revising probability i just watch these lectures and concepts get refreshed. Thanx is just a small word. Hats off professor.
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
I'm glad to be of help. Thanks for the kind words!
@khantimalkangiriya7803 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the help, sir, really helpful video as i started from 1st video , i understood everything you taught. after 9 years of you uploaded this video it is still the best video on statistic on youtube.
@jbstatistics Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words! I'm glad to be of help!
@amitjain33236 жыл бұрын
Dear JBStatistics can you put more applied examples like these , it's always good to see real world application of statistics than what we read in books like the ball , coin toss , choosing cards from a deck etc in book. These examples are amazing and the more students get to see these explained and solved by you. The more kids will start loving math, probability and statistics. Hope you keep posting these awesome videos
@jbstatistics6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback and kind words. I try my best to incorporate real-world examples in my problems, and I'll continue to do that when I make new videos in the near future.
@arbootieoaks9 жыл бұрын
Been searching youtube looking to help me study for a probability test, pretty glad I've found jb statistics! Thankyou, sir, I like the way you teach, best I've found so far. Anybody want to recommend some other youtube channel for maths/stats tutorials? You can never have too much learnin'! (Must be up to this standard or close)
@sivasakthi763 жыл бұрын
0:15 Binomial Distribution 4:32 Hypergeometric Distribution 7:27 Poisson Distribution 9:31 Geometric Distribution 13:02 Does not fit into any of the distribution
@HuzaifaKhan04 Жыл бұрын
Hands down, one of the best channels for Probability & Statistics on KZbin! Finished my entire semester's worth of course content in only a few hours thanks to you.
@jbstatistics Жыл бұрын
I'm glad to be of help!
@prathamrana477910 ай бұрын
everything he speaks is just valuable so simple so clear thank you😊
@mohammadpourheydarian58778 жыл бұрын
good example, good approach, simple realistic example, good learning tool. Thank you.
@jbstatistics8 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome. Thanks for the compliments!
@yasserosama34058 жыл бұрын
sir when you started with the hyper geometric distributions i laughed so much as i remembered the problem about counting females independently and that would cost you a job :D awesome videos really.. thank you!
@dannyhan2872 жыл бұрын
man, you're like Khan Academy for statistics. thank you so much for your work. very very helpful
@leiyin55448 жыл бұрын
Really hopeful,the best professor I met in my life!
@Toni-oy5gu7 жыл бұрын
When you explain a subject the way you do, I begin to like statistics (bit only a little bit) :).Thank you.
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
Well, I hope I can get to the point where you like it a lot :)
@erinuhelski85387 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! It's hard to find nice and understandable videos like this for stats. Thanks!
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome!
@hanskwan46458 жыл бұрын
BIG massive thanks to you JB, I nearly learn my whole first year Stat from your video, please go on and post more The way you explain and teach is way better than my professors I reckon Once again Cheers mate
@cadeemmusgrove77918 жыл бұрын
may the odds forever be in your favor...you saved my university life with this playlist
@jbstatistics8 жыл бұрын
+Cadeem Musgrove Thanks! I'm glad I could help!
@rolandroseramirez20876 жыл бұрын
excellent presentation of formula concepts with real-world examples.
@jbstatistics6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@mohammadgamaslazuardi64385 жыл бұрын
GG, explaining not just one condition thus make us understand the whole picture
@mahmoudsaber18294 жыл бұрын
I am really grateful for finding your channel! thank you so much for your work.
@ou-xiang Жыл бұрын
you're the best! you helped me understand everything perfectly in a short time span. I can't thank you enough! 😁
@jbstatistics Жыл бұрын
Great! I'm glad to be of help!
@robdeagan96409 жыл бұрын
This Video was awesome, Thanks so much. exactly what I needed, nothing more, nothing less. This was perfect!
@davidlejenkins7 жыл бұрын
Appreciate the help. It supplemented exactly what I need to know for my final.
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
I'm glad I could be of help.
@yujingzou18267 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, Professor!! Your videos have made my summer class a way easier time!:) Greetings from McGill!
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
I'm glad to be of help! I'm always happy to help my friends in Montreal!
@markanthonyoccena73453 жыл бұрын
thank you, you saved me and my degree
@keldonchase4492 Жыл бұрын
Wow, this video cleared up so much; thank you!!!
@amrshaheen70882 жыл бұрын
Organic chemistry tutor ain't got shit on this man
@prajwaldankit7 жыл бұрын
you sir are a life savior!!!! thank you so much !!
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome!
@ytzu50554 жыл бұрын
On the first example you would have a success rate for one mission, but the real numbers to consider when designing a system would be the neg binom for failure in order to ensure its reliability over time. Given the size of our military, if there were 10k systems used once on 100 missions, that would be a rather high failure rate over the 1m uses, and 7 or 8 components would be much more suitable when it comes to reliability. Practicality must be assessed however, so 6 is probably as good as you'll get
@roobear53575 күн бұрын
when Tom goes crying to his boss that he ruined the first part, his boss should tell him “ oh , sorry Tom , forgot to tell you …that’s exactly how we wanted that one…good job!”
@TheRoxas13th11 жыл бұрын
Wow, it help me a lot to recall the distribution. Thanks! :D
@jbstatistics11 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome! I'm glad to be of help.
@Kazekage1218 жыл бұрын
Haha that last one definitely caught me, i thought it was binomial and i ended up with 1.121E-6. Good question.
@jbstatistics8 жыл бұрын
+Warren Wilson Thanks! I like that one too!
@mohammedabdulmuqsith66034 жыл бұрын
5 years later and still saving our test scores
@jbstatistics4 жыл бұрын
I designed them to be everlasting :)
@aakashjaiswal20038 жыл бұрын
Your videos are excellent.. To the point!
@jbstatistics8 жыл бұрын
+Aakash Jaiswal Thanks Aakash!
@shreyasinha49803 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the explanations. They bring a lot of clarity. Just had a question: Why cant the last example be a hypergeometric distribution?
@jbstatistics3 жыл бұрын
The conditions of a hypergeometric are not satisfied there. For a random variable to have a hypergeometric distribution, we need to be drawing items without replacement from a source that contains a certain number of successes and a certain number of failures. That is not happening in the last example. Don't get trapped into the false line of thinking that if the trials are dependent, then it must be hypergeometric; it simply doesn't work that way. There are many different ways for dependence to arise.
@rakinzia75737 жыл бұрын
You are awesome......really helped me so much....Why don't you make videos on joint random variable or conditional distribution........I needed those badly ....love from bangladesh :)
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I'm glad to be of help. I frequently get requests for videos on joint probability distributions, and they are high on the priority list, but I'm struggling to find time to make them. One of these days.
@rakinzia75737 жыл бұрын
thanks for the reply... :) you know, you make videos so much up to the point....i have never seen such a wonderful combination of explanation along with a very relevant example.....i got very good grade in mid semester only just watching those videos bt sadly my semester final syllabus werent covered in your videos which include joint random variable......i recommended all of my friends about your videos before probability exam...now after watching ur videos they call you "JB BOSS" :) keep making videos keep saving lives :p
@mehar.hasnain7 жыл бұрын
You made my life easy, Thanks a million.
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome!
@Femgeek4203 жыл бұрын
I spent 2 days creating a tool to calculate I think...binomial I forget which one specifically. My online college course rushed us through 30 day classes I learned way more from the internet - and videos like this. Thank you for keeping it simple ;)
@schatzi59078 жыл бұрын
I love your videos, they helped me so much! But, at 10:57, I thought chance of failure should be 19/37 since the green slot is an additional slot of failure added to the 18 black slots...correct me if I am wrong!
@MasayoMusic7 жыл бұрын
I think he made a mistake.
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
In that example, the probability of failure is 19/37, as you state, but that is the probability I use in the video. I write the probability of failure as 1-18/37, which is 19/37.
@ManjinderSinghHanjra8 жыл бұрын
Your videos are really helpful. Thank you!
@gazzalifahim4 жыл бұрын
This video is Great. 😍😍😍 But for the very first example (military equipment problem) , why it is not a geometric random variable? I am sorry if I asked a stupid question, but can you please help me?
@alvachan887 жыл бұрын
this is a little late but just wanna say for 12:56, summing many terms isn't a lot of writing cause the geometric sum is commonly known, so we can use a_1=p and (common ratio)=q.
@davidsanjenis27787 ай бұрын
@jbstatistics I am curious about the answer at @12:59. i believe that the P(X>6) = 1 - 0.0183 (the value that was computed at the end). If we have an infinite amount of trials wouldn't we eventually get one red slot? We just won't get it in the first 6 trials but certainly red will come up at some point.
@jbstatistics7 ай бұрын
Yes, and that's partly what the probability I calculate is based on. The question asks for the probability that the **first** time the ball lands in a red slot comes after the 6th spin. That's definitely not a certainty. The probability the first red happens at some point is 1, yes.
@khaledsalah92482 жыл бұрын
You are a grade savior :)
@tuantje7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the helpful videos! I do have a question: Shouldn't it be (1-19/37) at 12:38? You have 19 non-reds, right? 18 black + 1 green.
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
No, what I state in the video is correct. Yes, there are 19 non-reds out of the 37 possibilities, and (1-18/37) gives the probability of one of those 19 non-reds occurring.
@tuantje7 жыл бұрын
Oh, alright, got it! Thanks for answering!
@RozArialind10 жыл бұрын
What's the process for the lamda is the poisson one. I understood it, but I can't put it into formula. Thanks!!
@wannadiaz88073 жыл бұрын
What operations used and how did it became 0.0245 before the rounding off?
@lohittalasila9 жыл бұрын
An amazing review thanks!
@Factoryseconds1234 жыл бұрын
Is there a video on using the binomial tables?
@chriscollins10978 жыл бұрын
how do you calculate the hypergeometric probability mass function by hand?
@maanvendrakholiya11668 жыл бұрын
you are really helpfull for us.very very thank u .
@jbstatistics8 жыл бұрын
+Maanvendra Kholiya You are very welcome!
@LearningToCodeAndDesign Жыл бұрын
So roulette is a potential geometric distribution? Now that’s interesting.
@michellepani51224 жыл бұрын
AWESOME VIDEO
@mmaking86649 жыл бұрын
U R THEEEE BEST!!!!!!
@jbstatistics9 жыл бұрын
+MMA king Thanks!
@sonujack16 жыл бұрын
Best explanation
@jbstatistics6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@omaimakhan35093 жыл бұрын
I don't understand how to use calculator for solving the equation
@nopecharon Жыл бұрын
I think you should also add a timestamp at 4:25
@primate36095 жыл бұрын
Does Russian roulette is an hypergeometric distribution problem?
@LG-mr7yv9 жыл бұрын
Hi can you please solve this and explain why please I need help:The probability that a new drug prevents infection by a certain flu strain is 40%. What is the probability that the drug will be effective in one out of 5 exposed persons?
@abbyterbio58365 жыл бұрын
If 5 coins are tossed, what is the probability that all tails come up twice in 5 tosses?
@jo_west48714 жыл бұрын
In 10:18, why is that formula used? Why isn't it "The permutations P(18, 1) times P(19, 4) divided by P(37, 5), all divided by 5"? Then we multiply "the number of ways we could choose 1 red spot" with "the number of ways that we could choose 4 other ones". Divide that by all possible cases (P(37, 5)) and we get the possibility of getting one red spot out of five. Divide by five to get the possibility of not having the red spot until the last round. Why am I getting a different answer? What is wrong with my formula, and why is the one used in the video the correct one?
@mkkkk16433 жыл бұрын
it is combination not permuration
@anwar_AlSham7 жыл бұрын
thaaaaaaaaanks alot habebe you are the best
@syedahmedali74177 жыл бұрын
you are awesome.... speechless
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@syedahmedali74177 жыл бұрын
you are most welcome...
@redberries80397 жыл бұрын
After the P of just 1 left working was calc to 0.0137 ..as the P of a single failure is 0.32 why isn't the P of all 6 failing [ie the last one after the others ] >> 0.32 x 0.0137
@fikret84226 жыл бұрын
why the last question can not be for hypergeometric distribution because of dependency??????????????
@jbstatistics6 жыл бұрын
Independence happens in only one way. Dependency happens in an infinite number of ways. The hypergeometric distribution is appropriate for one specific type of dependency, where we are choosing x items without replacement from a source containing a certain number of successes and a certain number of failures. That situation is not the case in that example in this video.
@Minametias5 жыл бұрын
@@jbstatistics That was helpful. Thanks
@walkboy145Ай бұрын
Why can’t you solve the last one with hypergeometrics?
@sauvikhalder26246 жыл бұрын
Why didn't you use Binomial Distribution in the second example?
@jbstatistics6 жыл бұрын
The trials are not independent there. As people are selected, the probability of getting a man (or woman) changes, depending on what has occurred previously. For example, if the first person selected is male then the probability of getting on a male on the second trial decreases. One of the requirements of a binomial rv is that the trials are independent. I discuss this difference in more detail in my intro to the hypergeometric distribution video.
@mohammadrezanargesi2439 Жыл бұрын
You're amazing
@jbstatistics Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Shumayal10 жыл бұрын
I wonder how does that logic work with a geometric distribution so beautifully... if p(x>6) then x=7,8,9... In that case, x = 8 is also possible..so how can we limit ourselves to only 1st 6 trials to be failures when the 7th can also be a failure. That makes sense to me if p(x=7). Yes I have seen the mathematical proof but my logic isn't satisfied...
@jbstatistics10 жыл бұрын
Suppose you intend to toss a coin until you get heads once. If the first six tosses are tails, then we know that heads comes at some point after that. (On trial number 7, 8, 9, ...) So P(First 6 trials are failures) = P(X > 6) = (1-p)^6. This implies P(X
@Shumayal10 жыл бұрын
I undstand the latter and the former but not the between. I quote you "we know that heads come at some point after the 6 tails" This is my question. So we can be getting 7 tails, 8 tails, 9 tails....too and then heads as there is no upper limit for failure (getting a tail) In other words how can we get a 'fixed' constant number for it. P(x>6)=P(x=6) X>6 has an increasing number of failures more than 6 But x=6 we limit ourselves to calculating probability for STRICTLY 6 failures and then a success. I understood the complement and the rest. I guess I'll have to rote learn this concept as I fail to see the flaw in my logic. :(
@Shumayal10 жыл бұрын
In short, P(x>6) = q^6 how ? There can be more failures than six isn't it sir?
@jbstatistics10 жыл бұрын
Ahmad Shumayal (1-p)^6 gives the probability that the *first 6 trials are all failures*. Since we are assuming independence between trials, then P(first 6 trials are failures) = P(First trial is a failure)* P(Second trial is a failure)*...*P(Sixth trial is a failure) = (1-p)(1-p)(1-p)(1-p)(1-p)(1-p)=(1-p)^6 (This isn't based on the geometric probability mass function, it's based on probability basics. I just realized that perhaps this is where the confusion arises.) So we are left with P(First six trials are failures) = (1-p)^6, which implies P(X>6) = (1-p)^6. I hope this helps!
@robdeagan96409 жыл бұрын
Ahmad Shumayal I know this is late, and this may not satisfy your query: By probabilities the ball will EVENTUALLY land on red. But we know the first 6 are GUARANTEED failures, so we can say that at some eventual point it will land on red, which is 1-p(x
@govindbhagat71976 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@jbstatistics6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@blancay79869 жыл бұрын
thank you!!!
@devonteburns83496 жыл бұрын
I am confused why are we using a different approach to the first one which had the equation?
@jbstatistics6 жыл бұрын
There are a number of examples in this video, and all involve different scenarios and different methods of finding the required probability. Which example are you referring to?
@mattbarett16 жыл бұрын
The first question should be p(x=1) because the problem said EXACTLY one, not at least.
@jbstatistics6 жыл бұрын
Which is why I work through the question to find P(X=1). I then move on to another question.
@anoniem0125 жыл бұрын
HELAL OLSUN ABI
@judeann7 ай бұрын
I LOVE YOU
@anooshiravanensafian78608 жыл бұрын
how can we notice that a trial is independent or not ??? (14:06)
@hanskwan46458 жыл бұрын
+Anooshiravan ensafian From the last question, the second paragraph is basically saying that Coz Tom is a bit Shaky, his probability to destroy an equipment after he destroyed one will be increased. So since the events aren't independent (coz destroying the first eq meaning he is going to have a higher chance to destroy the second eq, so the first "destroy event is related to the second destroy event", therefore, it is not independent events), The basic Stat distribution we can use is Hypergeometric, but obviously, the conditions for Tom's situation don't quite fit the Hypergeo distribution. So we need to think of an alternative distribution to deal with it. Since the question didn't give us further information about how will the probability change after Tom destroy the first eq, this question is simply can't answer unless further information provided.
@hanskwan46458 жыл бұрын
+Anooshiravan ensafian To notice a trial is it an independent trial is more like a sense of statistics knowledge rather than a Mathematical skill, although you can provide it is independent or dependent Mathematically, but generally just think of the "events" in the trial, do they affect and related to each other, if they don't, then it is an independent trial.
@Violet_roses456 жыл бұрын
Ive watched 5 videos im still confused so much for wanting to pass
@ameliagrota3947 жыл бұрын
Yo is this GCSE level or not?
@jbstatistics7 жыл бұрын
I know very little about the GCSE standards (only what a brief google search tells me), and I haven't tailored the material to any specific international standard. I'm simply trying to teach introductory statistics the way I think is best (pitched at the level of an introductory course for non stats majors, with some of the mathematical underpinnings included).
@chowdhurymohammadabdullah21764 жыл бұрын
4:45 ohhh dear :v
@torealityAN2 жыл бұрын
I see that you have never been to Turkey, same people can be in a committee more than once surely if they have multiple roles...
@jbstatistics2 жыл бұрын
Can a Turkish "committee of 7 people" have fewer than 7 people?
@torealityAN2 жыл бұрын
@@jbstatistics I see what you did there now that you reformulated it I sure doesn't make any sense. It was meant to be a joke anyway. However, tell that to the rectorate in our university who is the head of two other faculties.
@jbstatistics2 жыл бұрын
@@torealityAN Mine was a joke too :) I understand what you're saying.