"JFK" and "The House of Yes" LIVE Discussion! | Presidential Movie Marathon

[@aaronz7056]

Stone, neither in his movie nor ever since, has explained two things: a) How do you safely approach scores of witnesses, police (chief, captains, detectives, deputies, investigating officers, arresting officers interrogating officers, detaining officers, etc.), FBI, Secret Service, military personnel, Oswald family members, Oswald acquaintances, doctors, pathologists, Air Force One personnel, x-ray technicians, photographers, film experts, journalists, whole and multiple commissions, lawyers, counsels, senators, congressmen, the Justice Department, the D.A., the Chief Justice, the President, shoe store clerks, etc., etc., and persuade them all to obey illegal orders to commit crimes, assist a bloody coup, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally accessories to murder and treason...? b) How is it a BETTER and safer idea to seize and alter films, discredit scores of witnesses, threaten people, plant bullets, hijack bodies, perform surgeries, alter wounds, conceal evidence, destroy evidence, falsify reports, fake photos, forge x-rays bluff their way through subsequent, as-yet-unformed commissions, commit perjury by the dozen, and pile cover-ups atop cover-ups... instead of just leaving well enough alone and saying Oswald must have had an accomplice who got away, which would have suited any "conspiracy" just fine...?