JFK: What The Doctors Saw | Official Trailer | Paramount+

Previously unreleased footage unveils an extraordinary reunion involving seven doctors who were present in the Parkland Hospital Emergency Room where President John F. Kennedy was rushed after being shot on November 22, 1963.
Their testimonies divulge unsettling medical details surrounding the assassination, raising doubt about government investigations that found Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.
Stream the new P+ Original documentary JFK: What The Doctors Saw on November 14, exclusively on Paramount+
Follow Paramount+ for the latest news:
Facebook: / paramountplus
Twitter: / paramountplus
Instagram: / paramountplus

[@jonyivre4541]

That all these doctors are still alive, knowing that the youngest must be 80 years old, is an achievement in itself.

[@EcoMann]

4 have died since the 2013 meeting where they all met together for the first time.

[@randyharris3175]

​@@EcoMannNot true saw Jones and Mccleland on a previous interview. Guess what theyre saying different things. Mccleland says he was never threatned. And Jones explains why the throat wound was really an exit wound.😂It's deceptive put together because of the 60th anniversary

[@scottcampbell7535]

This was filmed in 2010. It was brought out for the 60th anniversary. Most of these doctors were peripheral. Many of the main-player doctors were dead when this was filmed.

[@EcoMann]

From the New York Times review: "the professional opinions of the physicians present in the president’s Parkland Memorial Hospital emergency room. ... What did the staff observe? An entrance wound on Kennedy’s throat. What does that suggest? A bullet entered from the front. Why is that significant? It contradicts the findings of the Warren Commission. ... You will finish the film agreeing that what the doctors saw is crucial."

[@randyharris3175]

@@scottcampbell7535 Right and some things that don't look right already been brought out.

[@dONALDBLOOD]

The poor guy had no chance, it was not an attempt, it was an execution...

[@jacobjones5269]

It was Lee.. lol.. Killed a cop, too.. You’re being conned..

[@badmanskill1112]

@@jacobjones5269 You know more than the doctors that saw the wounds do ya? It was no LHO. He was a sheep dipped patsy.

[@hashimwalters7543]

@@jacobjones5269People have to use basic thought process in this assassination. How in the world would Lee Harvey know the exact floor to be on to take the correct shot at the correct time and how would he know if the route were to change? A presidential motorcade may be made public but it’s due to change at any moment. There’s no way he was privy to the info. The Zapruder Film shows everything. Every reaction the President has is as if they all came from the front.

[@jacobjones5269]

@@hashimwalters7543 Ok, I don’t want you to think I’m being mean, but you’re a layman watching a grainy video?.. And there’s literally dozens of expert forensic pathologists who are looking at x-rays, and they all uniformly disagree with you.. I believe experts, OK?.. lol.. The elimination of expertise to believe whatever you want isn’t a thing..

[@jacobjones5269]

@@hashimwalters7543 Nevermind the fact a chunk peeled from JFK’s head was large enough to get a conclusive ballistic match to Oswald’s rifle… Hello?!.. That proves Oswald’s weapon hit the man in the head, FROM BEHIND!.. Once again, evidence.. Not nonsense..

[@tropicalbabe1]

As a medical professional myself, who has worked in a trauma ER, I can say that nothing goes without documentation in a patient's medical records. You can count on that, absolutely for the truth, not the government's reports. PERIOD.

[@stephenlord7316]

I just finished watching this and it is mesmerizing!

[@gravitypronepart2201]

🙄

[@fernan5320]

The fact that these doctors were threatened screams of conspiracy.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

But were they really threatened? That's always drug out by the nutters. "See, they were threatened. This writer said so! See, see?"

[@badmanskill1112]

​@@gravitypronepart2201The doctor just said he was threatened. Did you not watch this trailer? You gotta do better than that buddy.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

@badmanskill1112 No, I watched the entire film, not the trailer. Dr. McClellan stated that he had not been threatened, but claimed that Dr. Parry told him he had been told not to talk about the wounds. That's not a threat. The government didn't want any info let out that might interfere with catching whoever was behind it. The Police do this all the time. Both of these Dr's made mistakes in their assessment of the wounds. Both thought there was a neck entry and a head exit. They admitted that. So it makes sense that the government didn't want them spreading any misinformation. MClellan may well be trying to cover up his own incompetence.

[@badmanskill1112]

@@gravitypronepart2201 They didn't make a mistake. That's where the wouldn't were. And they were threatened. You're disinfo agent.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

@@badmanskill1112 agent? You mean I should be getting paid for this? I need to find out where all that money is! And besides, you need to watch the film. They ADMIT thier mistake. Sorry to burst your bubble. Again, watch the film.

[@TheOKamigo]

These are the most important witnesses if you want to confirm conspiracy as they understand bullet wounds as they saw them every day...so if they say it looked like an exit would in the back of the head, that's what it was and proves a shot from front right.

[@Gigi1111Layna]

Indeed !!

[@JoeyR9]

Exactly.

[@randyharris3175]

That's other nonsense because they didn't look at the back of his head. Though one Dr claims he did but sides with the WC position. It was determined 100 % the throat wound was an exit not an entrance. Don't know what hapoened to DR Perry but you're not going to get him to say what he said on that day He realized he was mistaken.

[@JoeyR9]

@randyharris3175 They tried to resuscitate him, so they saw his entire body. They've all been saying the same thing since 1963. The Men Who Killed Kennedy has their interviews, and they go into great detail of what they saw.

[@KillerMcDiller]

@@randyharris3175 Huh? They were there and YOU weren’t, think I’ll listen to them. The WC didn’t look at 1 single autopsy photo other than the hand drawn diagram and you would side with them? You’re a know nothing.

[@amesbond6883]

I always figured the truth would come out after all the guilty ones behind the whole thing are already dead by now

[@gravitypronepart2201]

One. Guilty one.

[@amesbond6883]

@@gravitypronepart2201 Do you mean the lone gun man?

[@badmanskill1112]

​@@amesbond6883He's a fed. He's in all these videos spouting the govt narrative.

[@justlooking4771]

Oswald was a patsy. And it’s going to repeat itself if we don’t learn our history, America. 🙌

[@gravitypronepart2201]

😅

[@stddisclaimer8020]

The lesson will be repeated until you get it. Oswald used the word "patsy" only in relation to his being an easy person to accuse because he had "lived in the Soviet Union," as Oswald himself explained. @jutlooking4771

[@mikelldaley9078]

HE WAS A PATSY ! MOST LIKELY NEVER FIRED A SHOT.

[@stddisclaimer8020]

@@mikelldaley9078 You live in a world of fantasy where evidence is ignored and your superhero (LHO) is forever "innocent."

[@jonaranda4595]

this aged well….

[@mississippimud7046]

Why would al these doctors be afraid to tell what they seen with their own eyes if not for the fact that they were threatened in some way .I cant imagine the fear they carried all these years .

[@scottaznavourian3720]

Alot of deals plaza and parkland hospital witnesses were 'persiaded' by the fbi. Those who weren't were ignored or ended up shooting themselves in the back of the head 3 times

[@jacobjones5269]

They never saw the back of his head, that’s what’s funny about this.. JFK wasn’t moved once on the gurney, these Drs never got a direct look at the wound they’re making claims about.. Among other reasons, like expertise, this is probably why you should trust the almost 3 dozen expert forensic pathologists on 4 different investigative panels over 15 years!… Who all disagreed with those ER doctors.. But, you won’t.. Smh..

[@liberalmike27]

One thing you'll notice if you watch it, the people who are honest, do the right thing, and try to bring forward the truths that they saw don't come out so well.

[@jacobjones5269]

@@liberalmike27 What truth?.. They’re wrong, they’ve been proven wrong, numerous times, and even ADMITTED they were wrong back in 1993.. Once again, the wound they’re speculating about, they never saw directly.. They only noticed how his head laid against the gurney, and oozing.. They didn’t understand the high velocity round cratered in the back of the head.. But expert forensic pathologists understand this, and what it means..

[@anonymoushuman8344]

They may have been told that revealing the truth could have triggered nuclear war. And been personally threatened, as well.

[@timmcguigan2421]

I'm a certified firearms instructor, I have qualified both at the state and federal level to train law enforcement on shoot no shoot situations. I was part of an elite SRT team while serving 8 years in the military and trained extensively with long range hand held weapons. Having been to Dealey Plaze, I believe that it is more likely than not that the shot that killed our president did not come from the back. I believe that at least one came from the front. I love this country, and I fear that democracy was lost on that very day.

[@des783RN]

Thank you for your service🇺🇸

[@Michael-nx2he]

In the video of the shooting when his wife is crawling onto the back of the car she was actually trying to retrieve a piece of his skull .In the movie Parkland ,not this documentary ,she gives a nurse that piece. He would have had to of been shot from the front for that to happen.

[@RolloTomasi49]

Well... 1- Retired secret service agent, Paul Landis, two months ago (09/23) said he found the so-called "magic bullet" in the backseat of the presidential limousine at Parkland Hospital and picked it up to keep it safe from souvenir hunters and then placed it on the gurney in the emergency room. 2- The Paramount Plus (CBS) Documentary, "JFK: What the Doctors Saw," which was filmed in 2014, but was not released until Monday, November 13, 2023 (just in time for all those involved in the emergency room to now be deceased.) Both these stories destroy the Warren Report and it's conclusions. The doctors in the Parkland Emergency Room have always told the truth and it points to conspiracy and cover-up. Shots came from the front and the back, so more than one shooter, and President Kennedy's head wounds were tampered with before the Bethesda Naval Hospital Autopsy. Period. 3- Finally, question to everyone... Where are all the bullets and bullet fragments?

[@williamfulgham2010]

​@@RolloTomasi49 I have also seen documentaries that back up this scenario. One of those reports came from a doctor at Bethesda who was not familiar with autopsies and admitted he had no experience, but was told to do certain things, and report it a different way.

[@liberalmike27]

Yeah, that's the most bogus "don't believe your eyes" thing about the Warren Commission's conclusion. There were definitely at least two shooters and more bullets, and the one who did the most damage was shooting from in front of them. One thing they don't mention is the trajectory--if he'd been shot from the building it would be downward. But the head wound was more or less level. They claim the car made him slump back but his head slammed back abruptly, and you can literally see the spray of brain matter. All of the early forensic men and women, doctors, and nurses all reported a giant fist-sized hole in the back of his head, later contradicted--and strong-armed to change by secret service members. Johnson had been in the House, then the Senate, and knew all of those old cronies on the Warren Commission. It's worth a watch. Good men got killed back then. Now they do it with plane crashes or scandals. But you can believe the CIA is still around and doing its evil work.

[@greenpen122]

The roughly 60-75 minutes, that represents the time span between his body arriving and the “official” autopsy start, is when the brain was surgically removed, bullet fragments from likely two different projectiles were removed from the brain, the major portion of right rear scalp was reset, and the small front scalp line entry wound was obscured…all to make the head wounds “look” more consistent with the narrative of a rear lone shooter. “They”…not “he”…killed my beloved President. Movie made me cry for this man…again. Watch and learn. Thanks Paramount!

[@JFKJustTheFacts]

Not true, there was only 30-45 minutes between the time the body arrived and the start of the autopsy. The body was not tampered with in any way because someone would've noticed and Kennedy's military aides and the Secret Service were always with the coffin.

[@HerooftheWild]

Just saw this last night and it's awfully suspicious when it came to the autopsy

[@gravitypronepart2201]

😂

[@badmanskill1112]

​@@gravitypronepart2201fed

[@mikelldaley9078]

AUTOPSY WAS RIGGED.

[@CamboigaYT]

Honestly after doing research this is one of the saddest days in American history close behind 9/11 my granpa was 15 when it happened and he told me he was brought to tears at the news and so was many many people he knew as the speakers in his school announced it, when he described how it all played out and how the people slowly learned progress it baffled me how much he remembers but something like that I guess people don’t forget

[@Gigi1111Layna]

It is indeed. Shockingly sad and so wrong. The amount of misinformation is incredible.

[@KillerMcDiller]

@@Gigi1111Layna yup & the amount of coverup as well. To think 1 bullet is responsible for 7 entry/exit wounds alone is asinine.

[@SD-nh5yr]

I was in grade school, we were told to go home and ask your parents what had happened...I was scary to death to death walking home to find out what was going on, the teachers would not even say it. I cried for weeks because I could not believe somebody would hurt our president.

[@kevinbrennan-ji1so]

There probably is no 9/11 if JFK is not assassinated. He was in the process of correcting several of our foreign policy ills and that was a major factor in the conspirator's motivation. Given time, he would have reversed our positions in Vietnam, Cuba, in South America, in Africa, and in the middle east. There were just too many people making good money extorting those peoples and making weapons to allow that to happen.

[@meganda1468]

I was in high school at the time. I vividly recall that day. The entire student body was called to an assembly and it was announced to all of us at the same time. Everyone broke out in tears

[@Fam200532]

The best way to find out the truth…dig him up and let a modern doctor perform the autopsy and do with transparency

[@clays1507]

The brain is missing

[@jimibmore]

@@clays1507 Also they surmise that JD Tippet is buried at Arlington and JFK in a Dallas Cemetery in his grave. Tippet's wife wanted his body exhumed and tried to get a judge to sign off on the exhumation. She could never get permission even waiting for that judge to pass and trying once again to be told no. What are they hiding? I think it speaks for itself. Research Dallas mortician John Liggett if you want the truth.

[@bloozedaddy]

@@clays1507 I'm guessing most of the brain was missing after the shooting because it came out of his head...that's what Clint Hill says.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

​@kurtmaxclassicrockvideosra2806😂

[@badmanskill1112]

No, there is more than enough evidence to know what happened. The perpetrators took over the investigation and mucked up all the evidence. The Parkland doctors know there were shots from the front. The fact the Warren Commission couldn't figure that out proves something way more sinister happened that day.

[@bloozedaddy]

Small hole "in"...big hole "out"....that was a LOT of energy from that bullet that had to go somewhere.

[@aaronz7056]

Funny how more senior doctors can be seen at their first press conference speculating wildly about the wounds, unable to conjecture about numbers, trajectories, etc., and are seen on NOVA in 1988 examining the autopsy photos and having no particular problem with them.

[@CountyBolls]

RIP JFK

[@crystalwilson7007]

Phenomenal documentary! Bless these doctors for their testimony. May The Lord keep them safe.

[@laurasands8322]

Can't wait to watch this, it's on terrestrial TV here in the UK this Sunday night 19th November.

[@nicolasstagg4657]

What channel. Thanks

[@laurasands8322]

@@nicolasstagg4657 Channel 5

[@Hieronymous69]

@@nicolasstagg4657 Seems to be Channel 5 at 9pm.

[@chasegallagher1326]

Glad to see a documentary that will at least make a valid counter argument against all the state run propaganda for the 60th. I’d recommend going and watching JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass or JFK: Destiny Betrayed if you haven’t already.

[@randyharris3175]

I suggest you read my comment on Mccleland. A good investigator csn tear this to shreads. Its the Cts believe if you say it enough it will come true. Dont fall from the nonsense.

[@randyharris3175]

By the way JFK revisted is garbage.Fred Litwin tototaly debunks the majority of it.

[@quentincampbell612]

Yes! I'd recommend you watch that and JFK and read books by Robert Groden as well......BUT make sure you also read the entire Warren Commission witness testimonies,Case Closed by Gerald Posner and Reclaiming History by Vincent Bugliiosi as well as With Malice by Dale Myers! That's a lot of reading and studying to counter the conspiracy theories but,if you truly want a well rounded opinion of the case, you have to read and watch things other than only conspiracy programs and books!

[@jonnyfromdonny5000]

Read the Warren commission if you like fairytales 👍

[@quentincampbell612]

@@jonnyfromdonny5000 you mean Oliver Stone's JFK

[@melemelstl]

Convinced it was definitely a second shooter that was in the front … also that’s why all those people went towards the grassy knowl cause they thought the second shot came from there

[@bloozedaddy]

so you'd run TOWARDS a place you thought there were shots fired from? Does that sound plausible to you? Because to me I'd think people would do the opposite...since that's what they do at every shooting I've ever seen on film. Something about not wanting to get shot themselves.

[@rastrats]

@@bloozedaddy Not if you're protecting the life of the President of the United States.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

​@@rastratsthey were trying to find cover.

[@badmanskill1112]

​@@gravitypronepart2201You keep lying on all these comments.

[@badmanskill1112]

​@@rastratsGravity is a fed.

[@pauldack5129]

Spoiler the Zapruder film was altered.

[@ThomasWesley-uc9kn]

Glad they are brave enough to tell the truth, even though it has been hidden for so long. Great doc!

[@gravitypronepart2201]

This is the same old debunked drivel repackaged for consumption of the weak minded public

[@stddisclaimer8020]

Speculation, conjecture and the initial guesstimates of Parkland ER personnel, as well as hearsay re: what someone said or saw, must yield to the authoritative findings not only at Bethesda, but of teams of forensic pathologists working on behalf of the WC, the HSCA and the Ramsey Clark Panel, whose position is supported by ballistics and medical evidence, photographs and x-rays.

[@xmassan20906]

It's amazing everything that was going on in the years before and after Dallas. LBJ, Connally, CIA/ex-CIA, Nixon

[@gravitypronepart2201]

And Scooby-Doo too?

[@Attmay]

Yes, he was taking a big, steaming dump on the grassy knoll. How do you think he got his name?

[@williamfulgham2010]

Among all of those entities named above in this post, more should be exposed about LBJ, who used the Ed Clark law firm in Austin to get it all started to take out JFK so Johnson would not go to prison.

[@92xed-sy8bp]

Best Ever JFK Doc, if you are hesitant about watching it, please do. Paramount went all in on this

[@enzos711]

I'm 61 yrs old.. HC Provider, for 40 yrs / RN for 30 (Vet - USN Corpsman) .. I'm a hyper Analytical, Critical Thinker (skeptical individual) by nature; I Love History, am a Documaholic & was Never Certain or Convinced, re "Conspiracy".. "Until" Watching this Documentary & M.D. Witness Testimony .. Chilling

[@michaelhayes7616]

May the truth come out

[@mikelldaley9078]

IT HAS !

[@peterflynn361]

To think that there are still Lemons out there that still buy into the Official verdict. Beyond Laughable.

[@alexvendetta5115]

Just by looking at the assassination video and before I saw any of the theories in the comments, it looked like a shot came from the back through the neck and a second shot came from the slightly bottom right and exited the left. Then I read the comments and realized they said it was a single bullet and a one man job? 🤔 🤔 the video sure didn’t show that but it is what it is. And we have to take the official word for it I guess. 🤷🏻‍♀️ Show this video to a kid or someone who doesn’t know the case and see if they think it’s one bullet or two? One shooter or two? All these advances we have in technology but yet we can solve an assassination case. Does seem fishy.

[@runawaybobband]

Is there anyone arguing it was a lone shooter? It's been a widely accepted fact it was more than one for my entire 51years. No new info will be provided in this documentary. Nobody's asking how many, they want to know 'who'.

[@aaronz7056]

I'll argue it: All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy's exit wound plainly seen exploding at the temple is consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Autopsy clearly shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors are seen on NOVA in 1988 having no particular problem with the autopsy photos. Witnesses a few feet directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would have plainly seen any gunman there. Zapruder's secretary was only yards from the fence and saw nobody there. It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns.

[@9Ballr]

Not a fact at all. There is zero credible evidence that anyone other than Oswald was involved.

[@mnewmy542]

Wonderful! It’s about time!

[@NYVoice]

Of Oswald's connection to this has been muddled (whereas it should be obvious), it means he was a stooge of the CIA.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

🥸

[@badmanskill1112]

He was.

[@mikelldaley9078]

HE WAS SET UP. HE WAS A PATSY !

[@franklinholt8054]

It blows my mind, no pun intended, that anybody thinks WE HAVENT KNOWN it was a conspiracy for decades!

[@gravitypronepart2201]

You did too intend the pun, and just because a myth is popular, doesn't make it real .

[@GLKHD]

@@gravitypronepart2201 please do the world a favour and do not procreate under any circumstances

[@franklinholt8054]

@@gravitypronepart2201 a myth? They don't hide myths behind TOP SECRET classification sweetie!

[@gravitypronepart2201]

@@franklinholt8054 whatever. The physical evidence since day one shows that LHO acted alone. Everything else is silly speculation by overimaginative conspiracy theorists.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

@@GLKHD this is because I disagree? Wow! Well there ya go. If he runs out of argument, re resorts to insults.

[@billroe4243]

the bs profiteers never miss a chance to do their thing...

[@sonitty]

yes all 8 of the doctors are lying because they are broke and needed the $200 each this film could afford to pay them to lie about what happened.

[@lowreztv]

So sad that this is coming out now and only after the recent revelations from a former Secret Service agent, about a month... It's all nice that someone made this movie, but that it took this long, the producer should be ashamed.

[@Gigi1111Layna]

Those "revelations" from the S.S agent...was pure lies to confuse the public further. As for the timing of the documentary, it was specifically made for the 60th and also to get the Doctors final accounts in one last attempt.

[@lindagiovannazambanini6218]

No, the government - CIA, FBI, DPD, and every President to date - and the media should be ashamed, they're the ones who have covered this up and gaslit us for 6 decades.. The Producer of the film is giving us the truth after 6 decades of gaslighting.

[@harmlessgrandpa]

Well, I'm not sure why the producer should be ashamed -- for 60 years the mainstream media has refused to tell any version of the assassination other than the official lone nut scenario. That's not the fault of this producer -- at least they're finally telling this now.

[@randyharris3175]

Dont buy that nonsense about finding a bullet.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

There really nothing new in this film. Just some folks willing to capitalize off the cooky conspiracy theory that there were more than one shooter

[@orobinczaia5527]

Just like Waco, OK City and 9/11, squash the truth.

[@izregistered]

Back and to the left.

[@randyharris3175]

This is just rehashed BS no doubt.😅

[@visionquest414]

one of the first docs told the truth ... then changed his story in a later interview...amazig how they get to ya

[@gravitypronepart2201]

They, admitted that they were wrong. They didn't even know there were two bullet wounds!

[@williamwinslowhansen]

Why can’t I see this in Canada ?

[@NateFreestyle]

I watched this and it kind of terrified me. I think any reasonable human being would be persuaded by this documentary. The question is, why was it so important for some people to keep hidden a possible second shooter? The motive is not clear to me.

[@badmanskill1112]

Because it was a coup.

[@badmanskill1112]

Have you read any books on the subject? 'JFK and the Unspeakable' by Douglass is great as well as 'Last Word' by Mark Lane. If you want to find out what actually happened.

[@enzos711]

It's explained, Rewatch the Documentary ..

[@aaronz7056]

Just leaving well enough alone and saying Oswald must have had an accomplice who got away would have been infinitely safer, simpler and would have suited any conspiracy just fine, no vast, sprawling, risky, complex plot involving dozens of conspirators roped into this mess necessary.

[@badmanskill1112]

Read up on National Security Action Memorandum 263 for motive. If he lived there wouldn't have been a big Vietnam war. He was pulling them all back. Some by Christmas 63 and the rest by 65. One of the first things LBJ did was reverse that order.

[@ShibaInu67]

netflix watch the American conspiracy the octopus murders episode 3...

[@Cummings7]

The Parkland doctors claim that the neck wound was an entry wound. So are we to conclude that the head wound is an exit wound from the same bullet? If so, then the shot would have to have come from the floor of the limo?

[@flowerlullaby]

the drain in the street

[@gravitypronepart2201]

​@@flowerlullaby😂

[@mamba_2422]

Watch the youtube video labeled, 6th floor museum. They actually get a full sit down interview video of Mclelland and Jones, in which they both agree the shot to the neck, exited the neck, with the back being the entrance wound. Jones also says both shots came from the behind. However, Mclelland still thinks there was 1 shot from the front and 1 from the back. In ‘what the doctors saw,’ documentary, they dont FULLY show what Jones actually thinks, only Mclelland. All the doctors dont agree, mostly bcuz the evidence & investigation was not clear and concise. They do agree with what I think, something aint totally right and something is being hid

[@Cummings7]

@@mamba_2422 I have watched it.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

@mamba_2422 And McClellan believed the entrance wound was the back too, until he saw the sapruder film in 1970. The problem, was that it looks like a shot from the front unless it is broken down frame by frame. At frame 313 it is clear the shot came from behind, but he didn't see the breakdown.

[@sonjafaircloth5507]

LBJ

[@stanleydavis7904]

For me he was the last president,when i hear hail to the chief I only think of JFK

[@gravitypronepart2201]

🤓

[@badmanskill1112]

He was the last. It was a coup.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

@@badmanskill1112 🙄

[@badmanskill1112]

@@gravitypronepart2201 What I said is very true.

[@mistervacation23]

Does the name Hernandez mean anything to you?

[@aaronz7056]

No.

[@bradf2349]

Not streaming in Canada?

[@Americaone1]

See the Zapruder film two shooters,only the government or the mafia could get away with killing a president 😮

[@gravitypronepart2201]

You kidding? The secret service was afraid because JFK insisted on open car, close to crowds with people all over roofs and watching from windows. Anyone with a weapon could have killed him.

[@badmanskill1112]

The mafia couldn't. Only the gov't. It was a coup.

[@aaronz7056]

Victims' reactions clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet. Kennedy's exit wound clearly seen exploding at the temple is consistent with a shot from behind.

[@mikelldaley9078]

EXACTLY RIGHT !

[@brucemaher7621]

What gets me is these same people are looking after THE AMERICA PEOPLE.... I would be very scared if I was them.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

🤔

[@WallaceJosephine-k6d]

808 Michele Camp

[@sash7551]

Let the truth come out

[@HeyaJahqn-t9q]

Cronin Common

[@mitcha1065]

they finally grew balls

[@chab1rd155]

C'MON PARAMOUNT, this is HISTORY, release it so we can ALL see it! Sheesh!!🙄🙄🙄

[@ForestFire012]

You can stream it for free

[@badmanskill1112]

@@ForestFire012 Where?

[@bobojones7702]

Why did Oswald use the cheapest crappiest $15 rifle? What is significant about carcano 6.5x52mm ammo? Why did Jack Ruby show up late to the Dallas Police Dept on Sunday? How did Oswald get the job at the Book depository?

[@LoneLee2022]

They used Oswald. He was told to go to Russia. He was told to try to infiltrate Pro Castro groups so they could use it against him later. See! Pro Russia! See, Pro Castro! He was a "Patsy" like he said he was.

[@bob80q]

The Carcano is a very well made gun, and $15 was actually expensive for those days.

[@LoneLee2022]

@@bob80q It was?

[@gravitypronepart2201]

​​@@LoneLee2022no, it was cheap, but effective. He could have just as easily bought a Mauser. Ruby hung out at the police Dept., and several cops knew him. Oswald got the job months before the route or even the trip was planned.

[@davekeating.]

@@bob80q The Carcano rifle has a terrible bolt action. You might get three shots off slowly but if you push it the mechanism will jam. The two shots in rapid succession didn’t come that carcano.

[@babyrazor6887]

the was a photo in either Life or Look magazine after the shooting. it was of a man in a Dallas police officers uniform. he had brought in 3 "Hobos" he had found behind the grassy knoll. the odd thing is that "Officer" was wearing an ear bud to receive communications from some where. EXCEPT... the Dallas police force did not use/issue ear buds at that time. The 3 "Hobos" were released. So who was the "cop" listening to.

[@sg-yq8pm]

This old BS chestnut, they were exactly what they appeared to be, three men jumping trains traveling around looking for work, they were identified in the early 90's when Dallas Police released files, the two survivors were interviewed and the sister of the 3rd identified him and provided photos, they were clearly the three 'hobo's' and clearly just three innocent men trying to mind their own business (but all of that could have been set up by the CIA blah blah blah blah idiots).

[@aaronz7056]

B.S., and the tramps are real. They were Harold Doyle, Gus V. Abrams and John Forrester Gedney. They were ID'd that same day, cleared and released with no evidence against them, their arrest records existing to this day. Doyle was even interviewed on camera more than once. Never mind that all credible evidence demonstrates the shots all came from the sixth floor window and from Oswald's rifle anyway.

[@mikelldaley9078]

THOSE HOBOES WERE THE CIA DRESSED LIKE BUMS. AND LET GO ! THIS WHOLE THING STINKS OF A CONSPIRACY !

[@magicofmacys]

JD Tippit

[@jeffeverett274]

So the team allowed Oswald to open the sixth floor window, along with the window on the west side of the bldg. Great job

[@aaronz7056]

Kennedy was filmed many times riding in open parades through other cities surrounded by open windows all over the place, and he was always shaking off his bodyguards to wade into crowds and shake hands, as he does twice on the day of the assassination.

[@mikelldaley9078]

NO SHOTS FROM THE DEPOSITORY.

[@aaronz7056]

@@mikelldaley9078 Sure, a man was plainly seen firing, witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead, witnesses' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit from behind, all bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle... but have it your way. No shots from the Depository.

[@jujubees5855]

Vindication for these doctors and nurses. Rest in peace, Nurse Doris Nelson.

[@nicholeblume2191]

My first husband committed suicide we were married for just a few months before our 25 years of marriage and I was not aware that this could have ever happened but it did and I continue to live and by the grace of God I continue to live 🙏 remarried and blessed❤

[@elizabethlong966]

The mafia did it.

[@mikelldaley9078]

AND THE CIA. INSIDE JOB.

[@mamba_2422]

Problem I have Is they cut off alot of what some of the doctors say, they all dont agree. Some say 1, some say 2, but they only play the doctors who say 2 shooters. For example, there was another FULL sit down youtube interview with only Mcclelland and Jones. Jones admits initially they thought the shot to neck was front, but he changes it (rightfully so), after learning there was a back wound. He also says both shots were from the back, Mclelland says otherwise, but they didnt fully play Jones thoughts on ‘what the doctors saw.’ They did Mclellands tho. In this other full youtube sit down, Mclelland also agrees the shot to the neck was from the back. I agree however, there was some kind of cover up.

[@gltglt8624]

Was there anyone in Dallas that day that didn't shoot JFK

[@CambsGraphicDesigner]

I didn't know this was shown on UK TV on the 19th Nov... Where can I watch now in the UK?

[@cryptocreweLINK]

To me it looks like she shot him sitting next to him

[@MaxFactor-k8g]

Oh come in. He's alive with lady di😢😅

[@petewells5593]

Imagine the list we are on if we comment 🧐

[@shelliepetty4951]

If anyone know WHAT YEAR these 7 doctors were interviewed, please comment! I have looked all over the internet and can't find an answer!

[@whahappened8398]

possibly 2014

[@shelliepetty4951]

@@whahappened8398 what makes you say that?

[@badmanskill1112]

It was 2014 but they waited until recently to release it for some reason.

[@shelliepetty4951]

@@badmanskill1112 yes, I could tell by their age. Wondering what year they did the interview

[@cycleguy1943]

If there was any time in American history for a conspiracy..this certainly was it😮🤔

[@mikelldaley9078]

IT IS !

[@anonymoushuman8344]

It looks to me like the original plan was not to make it appear that Kennedy had been killed by a lone assassin, but to make it appear that he had been killed by a conspiracy involving the Castro regime and the Soviet government. If this is correct, then one purpose of the coverup was to prevent the forcing of both an invasion of Cuba and all out war with the U.S.S.R., which some considered desirable and "winable." If so, then the plotters got some of what they wanted (e.g., the removal of JFK with impunity, escalation in Vietnam) but not all of it. Or, such may have been the reasoning or rationalization Lyndon Johnson and the Warren Commission.

[@Attmay]

We never lost a war in this country until after the formation of the CIA. Not one. They don’t care whether we win or lose because the military contractors get paid either way. That’s why they choose targets they know we can’t beat that have no strategic value to the US at all. Russia is no longer communist, but US intelligence agencies are still using the same playbook from the Cold War and expecting the same results.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

😂

[@The-moon181]

Mind blowing🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

[@forrestpreece3148]

The filming of the Parkland doctors took place in 2013. Most of them are dead now.

[@tracyotrhuiskamp1012]

Why cant I watch this in Canada?

[@Daigb]

Cuando llega a latín América?

[@Cummings7]

They didn’t see it all because they didn’t even turn the body over.

[@caloyssk1]

even the doctors findings tells there were shooters go brandon! keep it up

[@gravitypronepart2201]

🤔

[@sc2539]

Why are the American mainstream media not demanding answers and action? It’s unbelievable…shame on you all.

[@robertcompton5232]

Operation Mockingbird, that's why

[@simonebonelli1831]

Every time I look at those JFK footage and photos I never understand why none of the law enforcement, FBI, or Secret Service agents who stayed in Dealey Plaza took a defensive stance and scanned the area when JFK was shot. This could have been for identification purposes, ensuring their safety and the safety of others, or just as a natural reaction to gunfire. Many citizens instinctively took cover, like the famous couple who shielded their children. Also, why didn't they immediately run and sweep all the areas around, looking for the shooter or shooters and establishing a perimeter? There might have been more than one, at the time they didn't know.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

Their primary duty was to get the President and company off the X.

[@randyharris3175]

No they didn't

[@alexandraantonovich2412]

According to Rob Reiner's Podcast ("Who Killed JFK?"): The four shooters named were: Herminio Diaz Garcia, Jean Souertre, Charles Nicoletti, and Jack Cannon

[@aaronz7056]

Rob Reiner is an opportunistic, lying idiot who ignores and even contradicts lots of hard evidence. He's only interested in self-promotion. Yes, somebody desperate to frame this on a lone shooter was firing from four different directions with different guns. Gimme a break already.

[@christophermanley3602]

Rob Reiner also says conspiracy theorist are crazy. Take that for what you will.

[@user-mr2um7iz3l]

Rib reiner is a joke, always so snobbish bout it's his way, only his liberal view are right on, to me his just a blowhard

[@EddieHenderson92]

LBJ

[@birdbangbobarui]

Dr Oz knows 2

[@shelliepetty4951]

Who's word would you trust, the government or the doctors? JS!

[@NYVoice]

It all depends on one fact. The state of Texas was denied their rightful responsibility to conduct an autopsy. The SS hustled the body out of there.

[@shelliepetty4951]

@@NYVoice I know that. I've been researching and studying his assassination since 1969

[@gravitypronepart2201]

The evidence. In other words LHO acted alone. Sorry.

[@shelliepetty4951]

@@gravitypronepart2201 I trust the doctors. If you trust the government, you have bigger problems

[@davidk5109]

U guys gotta watch everythings a rich mans trick documentary. Blew my frickin mind. And they actually show the evidence.

[@randyharris3175]

Alot of this is nonsense .Like Mccleland saying in all probability it was a conspiracy Remember he was the one who did the sketch of Kennedy's head blown out in the back. But we know the autopsy photos show just the opposite. By the way Mccleland had the chance to view those pictures in 1988. What did he say after sering the pictures everything seemed the same as I observed in Dallas. Here is the kicker though when questioned by the WC in early 1964 They asked him flat out do you have an opinion which direction the head shot csme from. His answer it would be impossible to say. What this shows he formed his opinion post assassanation. He even admits Kennedy must have been shot from the front after seeing the Z film on Geraldo I rest my case like I say nonsense.

[@sonitty]

yes they are all lying.

[@robrob1488]

The only nonsense is you trying to convince others. Jackie Kennedy statement to the Warren Commission - I was trying to hold his hair on. From the front there was nothing -- I suppose there must have been. But from the back you could see, you know, you were trying to hold his hair on, and his skull on. Clint Hill earliest statement to the FBI 30 November 1963 - "As I lay over the top of the back seat I noticed a portion of the President's head on the right rear side was missing and he was bleeding profusely. Part of his brain was gone. I saw a part of his skull with hair on it lieing in the seat" Both consistent with the Dallas medical staff

[@81overon]

Which set of autopsy photos? There are at least two sets. FBI Agents Sibert and O'Neill saw photos of the head wound that didn't match what they saw at Bethesda.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

Dude! Are you blind? Pink mist blowing forward as rhe head snaps forward? It's sooo clear.

[@sonitty]

It's very clear you have to be little bo peep to believe the "official story" @@gravitypronepart2201

[@SmokeyTreats]

An old three part History Channel series on this claimed the head shot came from the shooter in the sewer, & another from the grassy knoll, & even a third from somewhere else I don't remember it was so long ago... A triangulation.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

History Channel! 😂

[@9Ballr]

You mean the Fictional History Channel?

[@EricM_001]

The perspectives presented and the interview footage are helpful to people who want to understand what happened that day. But this film's production is lamentably hokey, and dumbed down to the style of low-rent, mindless American TV.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

It's a silly rehashing of debunked theories, nothing more

[@JustMatty80]

I'm no physicist or ballistics expert, but I always wondered why people believed in a lone gunman. His head cleary jerks back. Isn't that indicative of the amount of energy put into a round to make it spin and land accurately from a distance with a gun shot from the front, ...action reaction? When he goes forward that means a gunshot from the back, right?

[@9Ballr]

His head moved forward first, then back. The movement forward at the moment of impact tells you he was hit from behind.

[@9Ballr]

@kurtmaxclassicrockvideosra2806 His head moves forward in frame 313 of the Zapruder film, exactly the frame where he is hit in the head.

[@laurad2442]

@kurtmaxclassicrockvideosra2806 No chance that would happen unless the shot came from the front. The debris should scatter in the same direction as the bullets trajectory.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

You need to Zapruder the Zapruder. First, the head moved foward, and the blood and brains blew foward. Then his head snapped back due to the back brace he wore, and brain matter splattered backward because of the forward motion of the limo. Brain matter was all over the front seat occupants, and seats, as well as in his seat and on the back of the car, and on her too.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

​@kurtmaxclassicrockvideosra2806No. There was blood and brains flying foward, clearly seen. A pink mist as the snipers say.

[@pdizzleaytch7014]

These guys may come up missing or dead suddenly

[@aaronz7056]

Yes, some conspiracy is going around "silencing" witnesses who have been talking openly about this shooting ever since it happened sixty years ago.

[@balser77]

This documentary revealed nothing new that hasn’t already been known for many years.

[@badmanskill1112]

Not true at all. Most don't know what was revealed and still believe the "offical" narrative. But that's all it is, a narrative.

[@aaronz7056]

Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy's exit wound clearly seen exploding at the temple is consistent with a shot from behind. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. Zapruder's secretary was only yards from the fence and saw nobody there. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.

[@mikelldaley9078]

FILM WAS ALTERED. IT IS ALL A COVER UP.

[@gina000]

Someone in his security detail accidentally shot him in the aftermath of Oswald shooting him.

[@aaronz7056]

Flatly contradicted by eyewitness, ballistic, film and medical evidence. Agent Hickey successfully sued the publishers of that crackpot book accusing him.

[@mikelldaley9078]

NOT TRUE.

[@danrode104]

Read Last Second In Dallas...

[@aaronz7056]

Fine: somebody desperate to frame this all on a lone shooter from behind the limo stood in front of the limo and shot Kennedy in the face with a different gun...

[@IwshIcldstrtover]

What the doctors saw and what Jackie Kennedy saw and desribed are two completely different things. She saw the condition of her husband's head close-up and closer than anyone else did the moment he was shot, and described exactly what the Zapruder and Nix films, as well as the Mary Moorman Krahmer photograph, show the top of JFK's head blown off-and of which all skull fragments that were found both in Dealey Plaza and inside the car prove the top of the head was shot off. Not the rear, not the temple or side of the head- but the top. Mrs. Kennedy told Theodore White within 7 days of the assassination that she was "Trying to hold the *top* of his head down. Maybe I could keep it ("his brains" ) in". She repeated those words twice. So by the time the doctors saw the head wound, it had been inadvertantly altered. The huge flap of skull hanging attached to scalp in front ofthe right ear was obviously put back into place by Mrs. Kennedy, and how the head was photographed immediately removed from the casket at Bethesda, and this is why the huge skull flap is photographed in its original position once the autopsy began. The skull flap appears very vividly in the Zapruder in frames 335 and 337.

[@robrob1488]

I don't know what planet you are on. This is what Jackie told the Warren Commission "I was trying to hold his hair on. From the front there was nothing -- I suppose there must have been. But from the back you could see, you know, you were trying to hold his hair on, and his skull on" This fits exactly with the Dallas Doctors. Also Clint Hill's earliest witness statement on the matter on 30 November 1963 to the FBI - "As I lay over the top of the back seat I noticed a portion of the President's head on the right rear side was missing and he was bleeding profusely" He demonstrates this by reference to placing his hand on the back of his head as have many of the medical staff. Maybe Jackie altered the wounds before Clint Hill made it into the car

[@IwshIcldstrtover]

​@@robrob1488 I'm from right here on earth. And I quoted Mrs. Kennedy's own words to Theodore White of Life Magazine, which she told him within one week of the assassination. GOOGLE it! What you quoted was said by her 7 months after the assassination! Congratulations! It's a shame you didnt do the research, or you'd know this! And as for Clint Hill. He claimed in his WC testimony-and during interviews that JFK was lying "Face up" in Mrs. Kennedy's lap, so he couldn't possibly have seen the back of JFK's head while she was cradling it! He has also changed the location of the head wound, in case you haven't noticed. One interview he says the back of the head was gone, in another, he puts his hand in a completely different location toward the right side. He also said "His brain was exposed" to the WC, but now he's saying "There was nothing left" inside the skull. Furthermore, unless you are one of the conspiracy buffs who claim the autopsy photographs are "fake", "altered" or whatever, the top of the head is almost completely gone as is obvious in the two photos of the top of head. And furthermore, the skull fragments that flew southwest through the air landed as much as 25 feet away to the FRONT of the limousine--not the rear. The Nix and Zapruder film both show the largest of two of 3 skull fragments discovered by 3 different people, David Burros, Billy Harper, and an unidentified person who found a piece in the street near the gutter on the south side of Elm Street and turned it over to Syemour Weitzman! No skull fragments were found to the rear of the acr in Dealey Plaza. Not one!

[@dlit]

@@robrob1488 You're right, sir. At least five doctors at Parkland testified to the Warren Commission that there was a large wound in the right, rear section of the president's head. Among them were Robert McClelland and Charles Crenshaw. There is a video on KZbin where Crenshaw explains that the "baseball-sized wound" in the right rear part of the president's head was an exit wound. He says the small wound in the front of his throat was an entrance wound. Thus, there were at least two shots from in front of JFK. He was also shot in the back, as shown by the autopsy photos and the hole in JFK's suit jacket. Obviously then, there were at least two shooters firing from different locations. It was a conspiracy.

[@richdyse3209]

Just cuz Jackie told them that doesn’t change the fact that he was shot and killed it. Don’t matter what she put back together or held the doctors can still determine by doing the autopsy what was the cause of death

[@robrob1488]

@@richdyse3209 I don't think Jackie put anything back together. Yes one witness statement shouldn't be conclusive but you also have Clint Hill's. And all the Parkland medical staff. And a number of staff at the autopsy such as the FBI agents Sibert and O'Neil. Which is a lot. If you looked at the autopsy procedures carried out you would know that it was a disaster of an affair. The Warren Commission members weren't even allowed to see the photos. They had to see sketches. The sketcher (Harold Ryberg) wasn't allowed to sketch from photos. He believes there was a massive cover up.

[@julesb7707]

I thought it had already been proved he was accidentally shot by one of his own security.

[@gravitypronepart2201]

Aw here we go with yet another theory!😊

[@mikelldaley9078]

NOT TRUE.

[@MrDuds1984]

The Parkland doctors were trying to save his life they were not trying to determine how he was shot, and where. They never turned him over to see the entrance wound in his upper back so they assumed through his neck was the entrance wound and they started the tracheotomy there.

[@vernpascal1531]

Don't give us The Lone Nut Garbage please! Nobody with a Brain in their head wants to hear it!

[@robrob1488]

Not hard to notice a huge hole in the back of the head. Which is what about 40 separate people have stated

[@gravitypronepart2201]

They still should have examined his whole body, as is standard. All woulds have to be addressed, and they assumed they were looking at just one would. Even admitted it. No these guys were incompetent.

[@robrob1488]

@@gravitypronepart2201 No there were not. There are incompetent comments being thrown about here though. JFK's body was ILLEGALLY by force stolen by the Secret Service for a Military controlled autopsy in Washington. The autopsy should have, by Texas law, been conducted in Dallas. In that had been the case the truth would have come out and all wounds would have been examined.

[@MrDuds1984]

@@robrob1488 JFK was brought in on his back (essentially dead) so I guess it would have been missed as they were trying to save his life

[@OhioDave1345]

Shameful. Somebody is making money peddling these lies.

[@JFKJustTheFacts]

Its not lies. Its the truth. Kennedy's wounds are the key to understanding the assassination. Because, logically, if there was a small wound in the front of his neck and a large wound in the back-right side of his head, then he was shot from the front. However, the people at the autopsy saw 2 entry wounds in his upper-right back and the lower-right back of his head. Meaning, he was shot from both the front AND the rear. Not just one or the other.

[@dougiegooner]

​@@JFKJustTheFactsCorrect! Senator Gerald Ford also "moved" the back wound up from beneath the presidents shoulder blade area to the "back of the neck" to try and explain the throat wound as an exit wound. Shameful!! Also, assassins do use silencers so they are not spotted, which is common sense in this situation! Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that this was a coup detat, NOT a lone gunman, who would have taken the easiest shot as the motorcade was coming towards the TSBD on Huston, but.... there's a "flat earther" mentality with some people that deny the facts!

[@JFKJustTheFacts]

@@dougiegooner exactly.

[@Caeruleo]

@@JFKJustTheFacts "However, the people at the autopsy saw 2 entry wounds in his upper-right back and the lower-right back of his head. Meaning, he was shot from both the front AND the rear. Not just one or the other." Huh? I'm not following your reasoning. You just said that people at the autopsy saw two entry wounds, both of them in the *rear* of his body. How does two entries, one in the rear of his upper back near the base of his neck, and the other in the rear of his head, equate to being shot from both the front and the rear?

[@Caeruleo]

@@dougiegooner "Senator Gerald Ford also "moved" the back wound up from beneath the presidents shoulder blade area to the "back of the neck" to try and explain the throat wound as an exit wound. Shameful!!" While I certainly agree that Ford should not have done that, I don't see how on earth him doing so has any bearing on whether or not the bullet hole in the front of JFK's throat was an exit. And the idea of the bullet hole in his throat is illogical, because it requires an implausible location for the gunman who would have fired such a shot. "Also, assassins do use silencers so they are not spotted, which is common sense in this situation!" As I said to you before in a previous reply, your reasoning here is illogical. Silencers might make a gunshot somewhere more difficult to hear, but they have no effect on the gun being "spotted," as in "seen." "Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that this was a coup detat, NOT a lone gunman, who would have taken the easiest shot as the motorcade was coming towards the TSBD on Huston, but.... there's a "flat earther" mentality with some people that deny the facts!" Well now, that's certainly a biased and closed-minded attitude. So in other words, everyone who has a different opinion from you about the JFK assassination has no common sense just because their opinion is different from yours and no other reason? How do you know that at least some people who have a different opinion from you haven't formed their opinion because they've studied the assassination more extensively than you have, and are more familiar with the evidence than you are? And once again I find your reasoning to be illogical, and that you presume too much that is not in evidence. How do you know for certain that a lone gunman "would have" taken a shot while the limousine was coming toward the TSBD on Houston? You have no possible way of knowing that for certain. How do you know that the gunman hesitated because at first he didn't know for certain which person in which car was JFK? How do you know that he didn't purposefully wait until the limousine was making the turn onto Elm to make sure he was about to fire at the correct person? You seem to have not thought this through very carefully at all.

[@TELEVISIONARCHIVES]

His own brother said Lee Harvey Oswald did it

[@garysouza95]

So? Also, the overwhelming percentage of witnesses at Bethesda at the autopsy said there was an exit wound in the occipital region.

[@KBennett77]

​@@garysouza95 Oswald did it. 100%. Go to Dealey Plaza, the place is tiny. I could have made that shot from the book depository with no gun experience. If there was anyone shooting from the grassy knoll, Zapruder would have flipped his camera over to it, it was right next to him!

[@garysouza95]

@@KBennett77 The Marines couldn't duplicate it. The Mossad couldn't do it. The Italian Army couldn't do it.

[@KBennett77]

​@@garysouza95 Conspiracy theories exist to make dumb people feel smart. Go to Dealey Plaza. If there was a second shooter, everyone would have seen it. Especially Zapruder.

[@shanedaley6236]

Even if Oswald did he wasn't the only one looking at the film footage how Kennedy is reacting that shot to his head was from the front