Johnny Depp Laughing As Witness Destroys Amber Heards Team

Johnny Depp Laughing As Witness Destroys Amber Heards Team
send me things to unbox
Nate H
PO Box 4359
CALNE
SN11 7BE
Subscribe to my second channel - / @mrhvlogsmore
become a member - / @mrhreviews
#johnnydepp #amberheard #news
teespring - teespring.com/en-GB/stores/mr...
amazon Affiliate link - amzn.to/2HlJFzh
Those wanting to become a patron - / mrhreviews
follow me on twitter to interact with me and suggest future videos - / mrhreviews
For business and general inquiries - [e-mail]

[@christopherfree3948]

Gets on my last nerve when they say “ mr depp was drunk, Disney doesn’t want to be associated with that “ yet playing a constant drunk pirate 5 times is acceptable 🤣 I’m all for depp, I have been on the end of someone like amber heard and it’s very difficult for a man to prove innocence. She’s very very dangerous

[@jamesleedham1093]

Guy should have said that if Disney apparently doesn't want to be associated with a drunk, why would they be willing to work alongside China, which currently has 1 million plus Muslims in concentration camps and over a billion humans completely subdued by draconian authoritarian laws.

[@cheng2136]

Exactly what's on my mind

[@humorm4152]

Where is the rum

[@slimfbiggyansah4295]

Well said, if JD turned up for pirates movie drunk what the big deal, the role he plays is that of a drunk but conscious captain. The person who cast JD for the role couldn't have done any better. He was spot on bcos that's JD in real life n everyone loves Captain Jack=JD.

[@KokoSagaGamez]

Why is the rum always gone?

[@NobuTea]

"Does this article exist?" "probably" "Does this article exist?" "I guess so" "Does this article exist?" "Go ask Google, why the hell do I need to be here to say whether they exist or not?!"

[@louisparker6553]

Seriously tho. Like c'mon guy

[@laurenvirginia8478]

literally

[@brokenhalo2001]

yea but what about the MUFFINS ?!

[@Vostok7]

M E G A P I N T

[@Swanicorn]

I had the same opinion as you but in the past couple days watching more and more trials has educated me that they need to ask these questions to lay foundation otherwise of you directly ask the obvious question that you really want to, the opposition immediately objects for lack of foundation or hearsay or speculation. So they HAVE TO ask if they agree to or are aware of etc type of questions that fortified why that witness is even valid or why they can answer this particular question.

[@ChristinaEKidd]

"How many husbands did she have at this time whom she says abused her?" GOLD.

[@doroparker1702]

"Captain Jack Sparrow was more drunk than Johnny Depp." This was said by Johnny's manager of the Bahamas island. This is so brilliant. Doing a drunk for family movie is fine. Drinking wine at home in privacy is not ok?

[@williamroberts6803]

Just practicing my lines captain.hick.

[@mikekemp9877]

well said.

[@madeleinedonaldson4422]

Anyone dealing with AH would become a drunk Even a saint

[@LifeAccordingToMatt]

Imagine using anything from The SUN in court. Anyone who knows of the sun knows what an absolute joke it is. It's only good for lining the gerbils cage

[@AuthorBeckySusanAdams]

I have more respect for my gerbils than that 🤣🤣

[@warispeaceignoranceisstren704]

@@AuthorBeckySusanAdams 🤣🤣🤣

[@ThoughtandMemory]

Remember Hillsborough. That rag isn’t fit for kitty litter.

[@laksanapranata7835]

well idk anything about The SUN. so it's a total joke ?

[@rebaxbayushi577]

@@laksanapranata7835 Nope. Jokes are funny at least.

[@HooDooBrown]

Amber Lawyer: So, is it true that Adolf Hitler consumed water on a daily basis? Witness: Yeah I suppose so. Amber Laywer: Mr. Depp also drinks water daily?

[@beobhan]

Objection: Calls for speculation.

[@CryoticMienshao]

@@beobhan objection hearsay

[@SoraBlackheart]

holy sht!!! This!!! They don't know what else they can say to blame Johnny for whatever!!

[@angelfury5000]

Doesn't everyone drink water? Amber had a bottle of water with her when she was on the stand. She must be relation to Adolf Hitler, she is just as evil as he is!

[@thaen9346]

Objection: relevance

[@melissameyers1869]

The way her lawyers treat witnesses is absolutely horrible .They are grasping at straws cause she lied

[@subaquaticpyro8234]

Shit attracts flies. Perhaps, ...

[@burninghotdogs4876]

@@subaquaticpyro8234 I like that saying

[@cheryllitz2579]

That's what she gets grade school graduates from the school of I know nothing about being a lawyer, or a human being.

[@morksisnthererightnow8738]

Love that Depp’s lawyers don’t even object to the absolute stupidity coming from this guy’s mouth. Just let him talk and embarrass himself and by extension Amber it’s genius.

[@wilabanodeniro9780]

“Would you agree that an article in a newspaper that said this” is such a ridiculous thing to say in court. They must have literally no evidence against him.

[@Goolesy]

I would throw Articles written about amber heard's legal team in to the argument and ask them if all of it is true.

[@ole0510]

I think they asked that way so that those stupid headlines are on the record.

[@Gothymothmoth]

If something was posted up about her would they us it/trust it?it's all true here-say and just scandal articles

[@valala2987]

I can see what they are trying to do though. This is a defamation trial after all so they are trying to argue that Amber's article is not the main thing that ruined Johnny's career. They just go about it in a extremely stupid way imo. You have an expert there that tries to explain why the op-ed hit different and that it is all connected to context and the time it got published but all ambers lawyer is trying to do is to shut him up as much as possible. They are trying to get him to say certain things that are a bit more general, purposefully try to ignore the context and get him with some stupid gotcha arguments. They have nothing on Johnny and only make themselves look like a bunch of clowns.

[@kirkhunter146]

Well that's what happening in the world today, Politicians lie and say elections are stolen, Media outlets repeat it and gullible fools believe it. It's called the big lie, lie often, repeat it, until it's believed.

[@richardduvall5630]

For a lawyer that screams hearsay constantly, he sure does use it a lot himself.

[@robbis222]

TOTALLY I was like wait wait wait... ALL of this is hearsay

[@anitaingram6297]

Why no objections to all these hearsay questions??? I am no attorney but isn’t “I heard about it” the definition of hearsay?

[@ForeverHobbit]

@@anitaingram6297 if it is an article/report you can use it as proof, but in the article itself it usually says "reported" "allegedly" etc... which implies it's all speculations. So the articles themselves are saying that all that shit is unconfirmed

[@subaquaticpyro8234]

@@anitaingram6297 The questions are about article, they exist. He merely asked of this article exists. He could really give a damn what the witness says. It is just an excuse to slander Mr Depp under the guise of a question by pretending the articles have to be true which they do not.

[@MrBoots1987]

Seriously!! Such a fucking joke!!! I can’t stand her lawyers!!

[@robmancini2549]

Imagine being the parents of this lawyer who were so proud their son is on tv only to be considered the biggest clown ever to practice law.

[@hosedragger-2045]

No, that goes to Mr. Binger of Rittenhouse trial fame

[@robmancini2549]

@@hosedragger-2045 ok

[@DontActuallyWannaDie]

@@hosedragger-2045 Yeah, that was... rough to say the least.

[@1985sk8ter]

I think this could possibly ruin this lawyers career. This is embarrassing

[@RaizelSX]

Lmao one would hope so he was a dog with an invisible bone, my guy on the stand hasn't agreed to anything at all, and he kept going... Like my guy just change targets smh

[@unfortunatedisgrace246]

probably should be a better lawyer then lmao

[@cheryllitz2579]

I hope both of those jerk lawyers lose their lawyers licenses. Both of them are awful, awful, people.

[@tiea9643]

Can you guys imagine anyone else playing the role of Jack Sparrow in Pirates of the Caribbean?! I sure as hell can't. Without Johnny Depp, there is no Pirates of the Caribbean!

[@MrHReviews]

Agreed

[@mrJules100]

What about Jared Leto? 🤣

[@FrozenSkadi]

@@mrJules100 *barf*

[@MrTangolizard]

Maybe ice cube could

[@1Mhoram9]

After five movies it’s time for a new creation.

[@DanteYewToob]

His entire argument is “These articles exist. Do they not?” and nothing else. He’s not even making an actual argument beyond just the fact that the articles EXIST.

[@AV-fo5de]

I read an article once which insisted that a London double decker bus had been spotted on the moon! Many years ago, my late Uncle worked in the news sector. I was telling him something I had read and he laughed, saying that was rubbish. I, young and silly said, "But I read it in a newspaper!" His reply? "Newsprint will take on anything." I often remember that comment!

[@nehpets216]

He's trying to argue that the damage to Depp was caused by multiple articles instead of just the article in question at court, so Turd shouldn't have to pay any damages for her opinion piece. His argument is having problems since most of what he referenced used her article or her as a source for the things said to hurt Depp's reputation. To win he needs to show that even without the lies Depp's reputation was on a downward trend that would have caused the same loss in opportunities and that it was Depp's known behavior causing that trend (thus Turd doesn't have to pay) That is why he keeps bringing up the stuff from before Turd's article and why the expert damaged his argument by stating that Disney didn't care if he got drunk or did drugs (plus the hinted argument that getting drunk on the set of a movie where you play a drunk pirate could be argued as method acting... the "guy pretending to be drunk actually got drunk for the role" possible argument)

[@karmakaze6694]

That's true, but he's not presenting his case, he's cross examining Depp's witnesses. It's quite straightforward - this is a case about defamation - not whether Depp was an abuser or Heard was an abuser, it is specifically about an op-ed that Heard wrote and the affect it had on Depp's career. What Heard's lawyers are doing is showing that even Depp's witnesses agree that there were many articles written about Depp that could just as easily have been the reason for Depp not getting work. When they present their case, they will argue that there is no evidence that it was the op-ed specifically that caused Depp to lose work. That means they can argue that the op-ed did not cause the damage Depp claims, and thus Heard should be acquitted. Even if the op-ed was false, even if Heard knew it to be false and was actually the abuser - if Depp's legal team can't prove damages then she should be acquitted according to the law. You may think they are stupid for constantly hammering on about these articles, but it is a foundational argument - did this op-ed cause the destruction of Depp's career, or was his career being destroyed by critical articles long before heard wrote her op-ed?

[@karmakaze6694]

@@nehpets216 Except Depp is not suing for the "things said to hurt Depp's reputation", he is suing over a specific op-ed. All the articles read out in court by the defense lawyer pre-date the op-ed, so are not a result of the op-ed being published. The question then becomes, is the op-ed solely responsible for the damage to Depp's career, or was it just another blow in a long list of blows to his career. That's where the argument over damages will be. This witness said one thing that will help Depp - all those articles were typical 'rag fodder' and he considered it to be "background noise". That's important. If those other articles had an affect on his career, then it will be very difficult to prove that Heard's op-ed caused the damages Depp's team claim it did. If Hollywood in general did not care about the bad press surrounding Depp prior to the op-ed, then Depp's claim that the op-ed itself caused the damage would be justified.

[@WELLHELLOMISSAMANDA]

To be fair, the articles are a follow up to the point that these rumors were around before the op ed and therefore it could have been those incidents that lost him money and not the op ed. And when the witness said is there any other husband who abused Amber in 2016 he almost put his foot in his mouth.

[@TabithaSukhai]

hearsay is defined as "information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor" - isn't reading a bunch of headlines written by other people about another person the ultimate example of hearsay?

[@Shade01982]

It depends. The issue here is that the lawsuit itself is about a written opinion piece. Depp's team is trying to claim AH's article is what tanked his reputation. So, AH's team is trying to show other articles about Depp existed before that, trying to prove the other articles may have been just as responsible for that and not AH's op-ed.

[@htoneninety-nine8726]

Why does the attorney need a witness to say what he's saying. The attorney just keeps listing articles and asking the witness if these articles exist. So exhausting.

[@lids8945]

Her defence is shocking. This was basically asking if this guy can read or has read every piece published online. Pathetic.

[@jenniferst.george810]

Her team is arguing that her article wasn’t the only factor that lost him work. It’s a thin argument at best but they only need to make that argument work with the jury.

[@raaspider]

That lawyer is so pathetic he start quoting reddit posts 🤣🤣🤣

[@anshu5518]

Ikr 😂

[@matildafaltyn6253]

@@jenniferst.george810 thank God its being judged by a jury

[@chickennuggies825]

And most of those articals are people lieing and the titles are just like click bait

[@tombrand236]

‘Is it true Pirates 5 didn’t make as much money as 4?’ ‘Yes it only made about $800m…’ 😂

[@geddoog3424]

It’s here! kzbin.info8pywBy_8iBo?feature=share

[@danishaferreira7796]

80 million

[@Cassie_-rw9ik]

@@danishaferreira7796 it’s actually made over a billion.

[@jovinlai3717]

Both statements can be true

[@Lorimars319]

😂😂😂

[@sinisternightcore3489]

Amber's Lawyer: "Objection hearsay" Also Amber's Lawyer:

[@czoloman8871]

The judge in the Sun lawsuit EXTREMELY overstepped his legal authority.

[@deepanshukaushik7181]

What do you mean? I don't know about that case.

[@czoloman8871]

@@deepanshukaushik7181 - The Sun lawsuit in Britain. The judge called Depp a wife beater - that wasn't for him to decide whether or not Depp was a wife beater - just whether the Sun printed what they believed and could prove was factual. The most ridiculous thing is that a majority of the same evidence is being used to try both cases.

[@doroparker1702]

JD should sue this judge if Bojo's country does not do anything about him. The judge maybe did take money from Rupert Murdock. Or his son did.

[@doroparker1702]

@@deepanshukaushik7181 You may google the case. The sun is yellow press with too much influence in England.

[@mmckenzie8085]

He just took AH word as gospel. Remember The Sun is owned by a very powerful media company and they have got away with a lot over the years. So even though actual facts were on JD's side they were ignored and fiction won. He even had the nerve to say someone who gave 7 mill to charity doesnt sound like a gold digger to me. That judgement was a farce. Thank god that judge is now retired. I think that was his last case. Also he and his family had connections to the newspaper. From what I remember I read at the time his son actually worked alongside Wooton who wrote the article. Draw your own conclusions.

[@thantrus]

I don't get this guy's approach. Is his approach just "This article exists. There's been headlines that say this. Do you agree that means Johnny Depp is bad?" ?

[@dayaninikhaton]

Throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks.

[@LordEriolTolkien]

It is very poor reasoning, sadly, most people 'feel' rather than 'think'

[@cormoran2303]

Heard's lawyer is trying to say that random articles from overseas media outlets written by people well outside of the Hollywood bubble is somehow exactly as damaging as a direct accusation in a US media outlet that Hollywood views positively written directly by Amber Heard. He's failing miserably. 😄

[@Virdice]

A GOSSIP SITE POSTED AN ARTICLE THAT SAYS HE MIGHT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN DRUNK, I REST MY CASE YOUR HONER GG I WON!!! That's more or less his entire line of defense, yeah.

[@barefoot6745]

I think the lawyer is trying to tell us that Johnny had a bad reputation before Amber accusation, meaning her words did not affect him one way or the other. This is a defamation lawsuit, after all.

[@GrannysPeanutGallery]

It is laughable that disney would have the audacity to judge someone else's character.

[@karadiberlino]

💯💯💯

[@Antronix3]

In reality,they couldn't care less about what an actor does behind camera. When something gets enough traction that can make them look bad if they keep working with that actor. They drop them in fear of them loosing endorsement. It's about their own image and bottom line. At the end of it all it's all about money.

[@josephcoon5809]

@@Antronix3 “image” and “money” are two different things for Hollywood. They people screeching about The Message generally don’t have the money to really make an impact with a “boycott.” It’s the regular people who don’t waste a lot of time screeching that do the most damage with a boycott. Remember when the Left tried to boycott Chic-fil-a? They ran out of chicken BEFORE lunch that day because when the call for a boycott went out, people with jobs said “F-ck you, you whiny brats.” 😂

[@whitneywillie4471]

It’s not about judgement. It’s about greed.

[@BloodfoxV]

@e NO ONE CARES

[@marieconstantia4441]

I HATE the way their attorney asks questions: “You’d agree ….. correct?” Talk about leading the witness.

[@PinkSpaceHippy]

Leading isn't a thing with cross-examination.

[@sj4iy]

You're allowed to do so in cross. The problem isn't that he's leading, the problem that his questions are redundant and pointless.

[@kaylevy7107]

@@sj4iy stalling. it makes them look desperate and awful at their jobs. they have nothing that will win this case. that's why they do stupid stuff like this.

[@suzannehartmann946]

I would like to see the judge ask the lawyer to stop badgering the witness, provide him with a list and ask him "which of these headlines HAVE you seen". He is using the witness on the stand as an excuse to read species click bait headlines.

[@perasplund76]

If Hollywood would be against actors using drugs and booze there wouldn't be a Hollywood nor movies... 💁‍♂

[@julienewman1761]

Exactly. They are all on drugs and drinks booze.

[@ljubicaradman2533]

So true. I guess 99% of them are on something!

[@Antronix3]

They only care when the public cares enough for them to loose money.

[@clickchick6861]

Which is sad...

[@goldstar1116]

Exactly

[@mbeeel]

"Netflix is a joke" I'm done 😂

[@AissurDrol]

Lawyer: "So have you seen the tabloids?" Dude: "Idk maybe?" Lawyer: "See, obviously guilty!"

[@dreamaria9823]

What’s a pathetic about attorneys in the whole court process is they try to squeeze human experiences into a rigid table of black and white “yes or no” answers and they try to ignore the context. Which by the way makes absolutely no sense when you’re trying to piece a story together and find the truth. I’m sorry but I really have no respect for attorneys that operate this way. They lack so much intelligence and the fact that courts consider this line of questioning as a means towards justice is pathetic. Our justice system lacks so much real process and it’s run by complete and total clowns.

[@cormoran2303]

This expert witness absolutely destroyed Amber's defense. It was glorious!

[@geddoog3424]

It’s here! kzbin.info8pywBy_8iBo?feature=share

[@jonbank7569]

Crushed her BS lies!

[@zizanie]

Mentioning our libération from B. 1776 was a nice touch. Sadly, Lost on many...

[@KLander03]

I missed it, who is the witness

[@diannebleacher6156]

A borderline who has retained a clown car legal team. My heart goes out it Johnny, but if he indeed has to go through this at least he (and the rest of us) is being given something to laugh about. This has become a highly entertaining trial…you couldn’t make this stuff up if you tried…

[@dcardigan13]

"Are you just going to keep reading these?" He actually said it to their faces hahahaha epic

[@Meredith13Angel]

I don't think I've ever felt so frustrated with someone as much as I am with this lawyer! Talking over the witness and asking nonsense questions! If that was me I would've been a smartass and called hearsay left and right, asked the judge if this whole questioning is necessary and I definitely couldn't have kept my cool!

[@spindriftbeach6082]

This Judge is useless. Allowing excessive badgering, talking over and not letting the witness speak is not justice. Why are press cuttings evidence?

[@Milkster1]

She is actually doing a pretty good job as a whole. I suppose you just don't like the pressure each sides end up putting on.

[@meganesenpai]

That's her job. None of the lawyer has done anything out of line that needed to be thrown out of court. She can only intervene if a side object another side's questions. She cannot ban a lawyer from asking questions based on his or her previous nonsensical ones assuming the next will be just as ridiculous. That would be speculation.

[@chriskelly9476]

I think it's great. Heard's legal team is making fools out of themselves. Let them carry on.

[@mellie4174]

Ya, i agree the judge is horrible

[@TK-ij2xi]

Press cuts everything.

[@maryt1978]

I cannot stand the way Miss Heards lawyers treat the people they are questioning. This is very offensive to me watching at home and I hope the jury is seeing it that way.

[@solidcatink]

I'm with you 100%

[@bootsdamugger6630]

That lawyer is a whiney cowardly bully.

[@solidcatink]

@@bootsdamugger6630 It's painful listening to that whiney defense lawyer

[@bootsdamugger6630]

@@solidcatink no argumenlol.t from me! He sounds like he about to have hissy fit

[@stephanielord-parker5616]

@@solidcatink Stupid correct? I had to stop watching for awhile! AM happy with Johnny's friends and family for their testimonies and patience with dealing with her team

[@WhisperingFelineASMR]

This lawyer is relentless. I don't think he's making his point like the way he thinks he is. He's in fact helping Johnny look better in my opinion. 😻

[@rileyrooster9827]

Depp's lawyers let them go on making idiots of themselves. While ambers lawyers ask questions then won't let anyone answer.

[@shelleythompson-brock6412]

He is. He's trying to use known publications as 'evidence' of something, and then asking the opinion of an expert. He's left it to the subjectivity of opinion, rather than sticking to fact. What he's trying to do, is a timeline of a sort of 'self-destruct of persona' rather than the actual implied libel and slander that JD was subjected to. He's trying to lay snares, but he's falling into them, himself. DUR-DUR-DUR...lol

[@micheleh5269]

Hard to believe she would hire such an abrasive, annoying attorney. He gets on these interminable kicks "..and you agree that (then he tries to give his own testimony), correct?"

[@mirananaim5971]

🤣👍👍

[@LanaClarkLC]

This lawyer was lied to by his client which is why he is helping johnnny. Amber said false claims and the attorney is just tryin to get info from witnesses that don’t exist.

[@kaischreurs2488]

"are you just gonna keep reading these?" someone finally asked what we're all thinking.

[@ramon2b2t]

JOHNNY DEPP MAKES PIRATES IF THE CARRIBEAN, A MOVIE WITHOUT HIM WILL LITERALLY BE SOMETHING ENTIRELY DIFFERENT, DISNEY IS FUCKING STUPID FOR RUINING STARWARS AND NOW PIRATES😭

[@jamesdrynan]

This guy is the most overpaid lawyer in the courtroom. What a dweeb! Throwing all these quotes out by inconsequential reporters is ridiculous.

[@CockatooDude]

Usually in court each side tries everything that has even a remote chance of working. It's unfortunately just the way trials work.

[@noah-cg1zx]

fivrr lawyer

[@theWebWizrd]

@@CockatooDude I don't think that is necessarily true. Trying things that makes the jury less likely to trust you will only hurt your case.

[@CockatooDude]

@@theWebWizrd That's a fair point. I guess what I was getting at is that I've seen some lawyers try to wear the witness down and get them to slip up out of frustration.

[@realityvanguard2052]

"If Disney didn't cancel John for public drunkenness, they certainly wouldn't cancel him for being me too'd". What is this logic? It's like he has no respect for the intelligence of anyone else in the room. Seems like he and Amber have that in common.

[@FlyingHangman]

Can someone put the lawyer on the stand and ask him "is it true that your entire case is based on tabloid magazines"....

[@geddoog3424]

It’s here! kzbin.info8pywBy_8iBo?feature=share

[@julienewman1761]

Also ask him about the muffins. 😂😂😂

[@gzbean]

ask him about pirates 6 😂 or ask him if he would rather see aqua man 2 or pirates 6

[@tanialabriola]

Seriously. This is ridiculous

[@davidh6300]

And make sure to say "correct?" at the end of the sentence. I hate this guy's attitude. It drips with arrogance and condescension, just like AH'S female lawyer.

[@MonkeiKing]

As a person from the UK I can say whole heartily that the sun is a rag 100% It's even the paper that is used as an example of rag journalism when you learn about different reporting styles in school

[@jidieo1157]

It's funny how, when all this blew up, when johnny was being accused pf DV, a lot of people outside of Hollywood immediately jumped to the conclusion that he is an abuser. Like most cases of DV that is actuethe other way around, no one bothers to ask.

[@neilod]

Witness on the stand: "Johnny Depp's neighbour said Johnny seemed like a nice guy" Laywer for AH: "OBJECTION HEARSAY!" Laywer for AH: "The tabloids say Johnny Depp was overrated" Judge: "I will allow it"

[@AQtePie]

It is so obvious 🙄 and it's infuriating!🤬

[@carlostejada1479]

The american joke of justice

[@hortondlfn1994]

IF a statement is on record - either by video or audio recording, or in print - then it is possible to use it as evidence, regardless of how outrageous it is. If a statement is NOT on record, there is no way to prove or disprove its veracity. Edit: slander IS actionable, but the laws are pretty specific regarding how evidence/testimony is handled.

[@neilod]

Thanks

[@luckycarmz6196]

"HEARDSAY"😁,i mean hearsay,,,jeez he asked a question at one point n didnt like the answer n called HEARSAY to his own bloody question,lol ,what a clown.....

[@meowjakx3]

Omg, her team is so annoying and clueless. How do you end up with such a horrible defense team?

[@darkaliebaba99]

No she just ended up with a horrible case. By abusing Johnny Depp.

[@Otohoto]

first i don't know if a lot of good and decent lawyers would agree on taking this case of defending AH after rewiewing it, and then i suppose her actual team is doing it's best with what they have, which is literally close to nothing

[@tinab3627]

This type of thing happens when the defence has nothing. They just throw out garbage

[@Youngmacho]

It’s because they have nothing to work with

[@samgibson684]

Replacement lawyers are like calling a contractor to finish the remodel you started on your own You are going to pay double....

[@2807elliot]

Love this guy , he’s exasperated by the drawing out … but he’s dealing with it soo well !! 😅

[@mutantbrain92]

Why isn't this lawyer objecting to his own questions with "hearsay?" Like he would do with Johnny's lawyer doing that to Heard's witnesses. This whole court case is such a joke. I feel bad for Johnny having to sit through this.

[@Blackemperess]

Because they are making fools of themselves and looking like rank amateurs that don't know what the hell they are doing. I would let them continue to give them more rope with which to hang themselves as it works in their favor. It is frustrating to see though and makes me want to see one of the witnesses hop the podium and punch the prick but there is logic behind it. At least I hope that is what is going on.

[@behuman5725]

Maybe he had drunk episodes because having a terrible spouse. How many other people get drunk and still work? Just because you’re drunk doesn’t make you an abuser

[@trevorhart545]

Could be a sign of ABUSE by Amber Heard?

[@TheIsopod06]

Ummmm I’m on Johnys side but what you’re saying is unacceptable you CANT work properly while being drunk. And yes you can abuse of the substance drunk people tend to be violent and very mean. Johny wasn’t drunk on set and if he was most of the crew would’ve come forward is literally hell to work with an alcoholic or a drug abuser.

[@aaronlimeuchin7352]

@@TheIsopod06 not in movie works. There are many accounts of actors and actresses coming in the work drunk, and they just turn a blind eye to it, so why it is the big deal when it comes to Johnny Depp??

[@TheIsopod06]

@@aaronlimeuchin7352 that a lot of people are doing it doesn’t mean it’s okay. You shouldn’t work while drunk. i don’t care if you’re an actor, a chef or whatever.

[@misanthrope_6715]

majority of people use a substance (alcohol or drugs same thing) day to day consistently. Whether or not you believe you're of mind to "work" is completely down to the individual. Personally i draw the line at physical danger, so i wont get in a car or use a knife (chefing) under any influence. I'll happily sit in a booth selling tickets to randoms high of my face. Substance abuse has a correlation with being abusive, theres a beer called Stella Artois nicknamed wife beater because of it. However (big however) there's a serious case of individualism here because give me a few pints of stella and ill be a bubbly happy idiot, hand it to one of my mates completely different story.

[@thehandleisuseless]

wow, that is possibly the worst lawyer I've ever seen, this is beyond Embarrassing

[@Myharoth]

But, you have seen him. (This quip from Pirates works better with "heard of" than "seen.")

[@MariVictorius]

To be fair, he has precious little to work with and is doing his best. He’s the little engine that could 🤣

[@gabrielcortez5263]

I'm beginning to think he isn't one

[@deanjones2525]

He's so rude and smug; he's badgering the witness.

[@corbin_4738]

Has Amber Heard taken the stand at all? I know Johnny Depp has -- because half of these witnesses seem pointless

[@Lavin51]

This lawyer god damn. WHY THE HELL is he thinking, that we think that newspapers are showing evidence?! Get this man another Job. This lawyer doesn't even know the system of "how to manipulate society to gain more money by klicks or sales on newspapers". This is a ridicolous non professional Job by him and that's in a case thats so important to the whole world.

[@elendilnz]

My partner of 30 years was drinking and going home late after work when with his first wife. She was quite like Amber. He stopped cold turkey even though he thought he was an alcoholic. Then he left his wife. He drank no alcohol for about 20 years. About 10 years ago I said “you could have a drink sometimes if you felt like it, you’d be fine”. For the past 10 years he has red wine with dinner occasionally and he IS fine. I feel sad for Johnny and it has been shown that he was okay with the other two women in his life.

[@stormage6619]

"Well does she have another husband that abused her" epic moment! 😂

[@geddoog3424]

It’s here! kzbin.info8pywBy_8iBo?feature=share

[@kathywebb4942]

Good grief! That attorney is ANNOYING af! Isn’t he the same one who objected to himself? Twice?!?!?! Incompetent ass. 😤😤

[@papertonklol4865]

he might be annoying, but what he is trying to do, and to a degree does, is to make a point of depps reputation BEFORE Heards Op/Ed. this case is specifically a defamation lawsuit, its a case in wether or not her claims is what cost depps his job. and if those claims were false

[@lilskipper4683]

He's probably not that incompetent, he's just picked the wrong side in this case (which can happen to the best of us). We never know, he might actually be one of the best lawyers but this case could totally ruin him/his entire career.

[@fizzonmyjayce6144]

@@lilskipper4683 and then he will be suing Amber heard for defamation aswell

[@matildafaltyn6253]

He was so hard to pay attention to what he wax saying like a drone in monotone

[@matildafaltyn6253]

@@papertonklol4865 do you think would be a better tactic to have made the case about DV and not defamation?

[@DMR1010]

How the hell has Disney got principles all of a sudden!

[@kimberlylaughner5067]

That lawyer gets under my skin like nails on chalk board.. Her lawyers are complete bottom feeders!! 🤡🙄

[@brianabc83]

That lawyer never let's the witness finish talking, always cuts him off and rushes to the next question, seems he's trying to keep the witness off balance. AH's team likes to play dirty just like her.

[@Antronix3]

He's not hearing the answer he wants so he moves on.

[@Caroline-lj9wq]

It also adds to the idea that they are trying to silence Johnny. The defense calls hearsay every chance they get yet they present hearsay as evidence! It’s absurd!

[@jenn8179]

I would say the next "question" loosely. It's just him reading article titles and saying "Correct? Correct? Correct?" Just so he can read a montage of article titles 🙄

[@adamrobinson6951]

There's only one side in any argument that doesn't want witnesses to say everything they believe is relevant in the most straightforward way possible. If you think their testimony helps your argument, you want them to say it in a way the jury will understand and to clarify any points that may be misunderstood. Alternatively, if you believe their testimony undermines your case then your only hope is to try to twist it without letting them clarify anything.

[@phyllisstrider2998]

Lawyer is an joke! I am embarrassed to listen.

[@adelinaclonts7004]

Does the attorney know how ridiculous his questions are? Gossip exists everywhere! That’s why articles exist. They are gossip starters. Is there an article on this attorney??

[@greatleader4841]

He forgot to mention most of those articles are opinion pieces. Which are legally exempt from being held as evidence since it's someone's opinion and not a stated fact.

[@emmybob2972]

Yep! Objection Hearsay!

[@Blackemperess]

There will be after this shitshow.

[@JohnSmith-ys3wc]

He is counting on stupid jurors.

[@insidescuff]

@@greatleader4841 no that’s not true otherwise the judge would’ve stopped him from mentioning articles a long time ago. Unless you know the law better than her

[@SkellaBella1396]

This witness looks so baffled and irritated. Like “are you just gonna keep reading those off to me?” What does he even need to be there for? At this point he’s just a wall for the lawyer to bounce negative articles off of lmao

[@megflat2981]

That side of the court looks like they’re one tent short of a small circus 🎪

[@heninejordaan4714]

Johnny Depp's role as Edward Scissor Hands was the closest he played to the real him. I have a son that is so soft and kind and I am afraid that the world might break him.

[@bunnyflick4387]

That's very sweet and beautiful.

[@karobythell4425]

Bless you , I hope he can live smoothly & well in this crazy old world xx

[@heninejordaan4714]

@@bunnyflick4387 I appreciate your kind response

[@heninejordaan4714]

@@karobythell4425Thanks for your support

[@heninejordaan4714]

@@karobythell4425 thanks for helping my family just to go on. We are from Africa

[@hoomannili]

Amber's lawyers have simply created lots of garbage work for themselves to justify billing for the case. Their lines of enquiries and questions are simply ridicules.

[@trevorhart545]

Well at least we know that Ambers Legal Team read the UK Sun newspaper. They must have it flown in?

[@Rehd66]

So is the way you spell ridiculous

[@pochita7004]

@@Rehd66 So this is the way you spell ridiculous*

[@jamdaddy4181]

I think their paycheck hangs in the balance, they need a win or it's gonna be very difficult to get money out of miss Heard cause i don't think she's got a lot of money left... hahaha

[@hoomannili]

@@trevorhart545 Good point.

[@michaelbastarache7124]

Why, oh why are the defense lawyers constantly trying to prove that JD drinks excessively? What would be amazing and really embarrass the defense would be for JD to have his lawyers recall him to the stand, ask a few bullshit questions which they have the right to do, be in his drunken character mode which he can do without a single drop of booze/liquor, seemingly being drunk, and when the defense on cross examination attacks/claims that JD is drunk while in court, JD drops out of character to being his sober self and have his legal team (before all of this goes down) subpoena an expert, not a cop, on breathalyzer testing to do an actual live in the courtroom active test on JD, which would give a reading a 0.00 proving that JD can appear drunk which would bring into question and cast serious doubt that any "evidence/statement" that was placed in court records, can with100% certainty be legal evidence, or just fabrication, on the very fact that JD was only showing off his acting character in front of friends and colleagues, just to prove that JD can pretend to be drunk yet not be legally drunk at the same time, or having had any alcoholic beverage whatsoever, on a whim in public, or on a movie set! That would force the defense to stop with the argument that JD is a problematic alcoholic, which at this time is half of the defense councils claims! Anyone else agree? Respect to JD!

[@deetorrance3659]

It’s pretty bad, when the only evidence her lawyers have are headlines written for entertainment, not facts.

[@rc-dk6by]

The hearsay lawyer only uses hearsay 🤷🏼‍♂️😂😂😂

[@tanialabriola]

Exactly. And Johnny's lawyers let them just run with it cause AH's lawyers look absolutely pathetic.

[@me.stretta534]

Hey this man knows his Hearsay

[@rc-dk6by]

@@tanialabriola “never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake”

[@savinggrace121]

Every day this trial goes on, the more and more miss Terd and her team are hated, and Johnny is loved even more and more. Even by people who don’t know anything about JD and ATerd

[@Patrick-857]

I never believed her. Not even back in 2016.

[@sanahm4892]

Yeah I didn’t know anything about both of them (i had heard of Johnny Depp but haven’t watched his films, I must live under a rock I know😭) - I started watching this trial as I come from a legal background and gosh, I feel so bad for Depp!!! He is clearly the victim it’s sad tbh

[@geddoog3424]

It’s here! kzbin.info8pywBy_8iBo?feature=share

[@dhe8742]

Hold up, the correct term is A Turd

[@janicecox1143]

@@sanahm4892 I was always a fan of JD particularly loved the film the Tourist and was so disappointed when I heard of his domestic abuse towards Amber, then I heard the tape recordings and realised he was the abused one. We shall find out how good an actress she is when she testifies

[@vicmo25]

This Lawyer: "Your honor, there are expert on the History Channel that say aliens billed the pyramids, there for it must be true.

[@16ShiningUmbreon]

"I thought we got rid of the UK in 1776, but I guess not." LOL

[@Khobotov]

So Disney doesn't want to associate with a person that drinks sometimes, but depicting a drunk pirat in a movie aimed at kids is perfectly fine for them?

[@clickchick6861]

Hahahahahahaha trueee

[@jwallabaddabingbaddoboomgu257]

Well said!!

[@jens6528]

They sell alcohol at their park!! Lmao

[@tokarteam1]

“Would you agree that this article says x” 😂🤷‍♂️ what an absolute joke

[@Raz-lw9vi]

Bro is rottenborn insecure bout his readin or what??

[@coreyblaser]

If I were on this jury, not knowing anything about this case or the two actors until it was presented, I’d side with Depp solely because Heard’s counsel would make me sit through their dribble.

[@fightclub6291]

The witness gives me serious Nicholson vibes in A Few Good Men here....

[@OxiSG]

The lawyer is trying so hard to be a “movie lawyer” that pressures the witness and gets all the answers out. And so far has failed spectacularly, and he keeps doing it 💀

[@farahwashindroy6346]

Exactly my thoughts 😂 i think he dreams to have his “Elle Woods” moment where she pressured the girl to admit guilty

[@b.6826]

@@farahwashindroy6346 He was hoping that Johnny Depp would come to court with a perm as he prepared for

[@AwwZack]

@@farahwashindroy6346 “and your boyfriends name is…?” Hahah

[@Secrets.of.tarot_]

I’m deadxxx😂😂😂😂

[@madjackgamingandfitness498]

It probably works on uneducated people with no big background, that might be the kind of people he’s used to. And I can only guess Amber hired lawyers that would just agree with her on everything knowing her background.

[@BirdieNumNums98]

"Are you just going to keep reading these?" Yes. Yes he will because the Defense is grasping for straws at this point.

[@hippydippy]

They have been all along. They are TOAST & they know it! Or again... Maybe not as stupid as they are. lol

[@GB2G]

the straws have grew legs and ran out the window 4:25 now they propose Johnny legitimately had plans of assassinating the president

[@geddoog3424]

It’s here! kzbin.info8pywBy_8iBo?feature=share

[@emiolaadesina4095]

🤣🤣🤣

[@lechenaultia5863]

How is the lawyer able to cite article after article without even providing the title or the date or giving the witness the opportunity to read them? Ridiculous.

[@Absolite1232]

"Did this article that came out 7 years ago, come out" What type of question is that?

[@InfamousX1000]

This lawyer is literally grasping at straws at this point, he doesn’t know what to do what to say, he’s just so lost he can only repeat the word “hearsay”

[@XpVersusVista]

well no. What he's trying to do here is getting the guy to say something that can be actively misinterpreted to help their case. Basically, he's trying to achieve a "hah, gotcha, you said something i can use against you, even if you meant it in a completely different way!". He has a plan. It's a fucking stupid 5th grader level plan, but he has a plan.

[@girafficparkgaming]

He is hesitant and has been chewed up and spat out

[@jenn8179]

It's like he's not really asking questions...he just wants to quote article titles

[@utesandoval138]

Some clown layers should not attempt to balance walk on the trapeze with their big shoes....

[@waijun08]

He is beating the bush, but he failed to realized he beat the wrong bush and attracting anaconda to have him eaten as snack.

[@Dwarficus]

As a brit, this witness's opinion of the Sun "newspaper" is bang on the money. From my pov, the Sun is no better than the US's National Enquirer. They are so much of a joke that quite a few major football (that's soccer for the Americans) clubs here, including Liverpool FC, have signs on the enterences stating that the Sun's "journelists" are banned from entering the grounds.

[@IrateTurkey]

All newspapers are a tossrag, Liverpool only hates the sun because they don't provide indiscriminately positive press towards the Labour Party, which no reasonable publication would.

[@thesandwich5321]

Agreed! They're pretty scummy.

[@sandragrant2771]

Nobody believes anything in the Sun

[@klapitall]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@mockingslur6945]

I like how the lawyer said making 800 million on a movie is bombing at the box office lol

[@kellyaydenperks331]

We the people of the UK 🇬🇧 stand with jonny ❤️

[@Evanseys]

How come these lawyers are allowed to "lead the witness". This whole trial is a joke.

[@barbie3139]

it can be annoying. This was cross examination. Its with direct testimony that they can't lead..

[@marlonestrella8105]

Don’t worry lol, they are going to tear apart ambers witness when it comes to cross lol

[@Zero-jt3bs]

the judge is on amber's payroll the amount of ridiculous bullshit that these "lawyers" bring up that isnt even relevant to the case like fucking muffins are allowed to drag for hours but when something serious like the voice recordings are getting dismissed quickly

[@whiteobama3032]

Depps defense stays quiet and hold objections because they're just letting ATs defense dig their own grave.

[@monged4life442]

Leading the witness for their opinion on articles they haven't read... it's a bit bizarre.

[@MariaGutierrez-uw4eb]

I admired the witness’s patient; he tried to hold his laugh many times.

[@unrepentantoffender188]

PATIENCE OBOB

[@dencave]

The attorneys often object "Hearsay!"...Is not all of these newspaper articles hearsay?

[@joyceqiu4307]

literally listening to the questions “you agree that ____” that id want to get off the witness stand and punch the lawyer to get him to shut up

[@xXturbo86Xx]

This guy is an absolute legend. Hollywood's OId Guard. You can see his disgust of what Hollywood has become.

[@geddoog3424]

It’s here! kzbin.info8pywBy_8iBo?feature=share

[@Grauer1510]

It's very likely that Hollywood was even worse in the "Old Days". Considering there was nothing like the internet today and people could get away with stuff more easily because nobody knew or had proof 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@Biyonzo]

I mean hollywood was even worse back then, its just that now they actually try to hide it.

[@wumni]

He takes what is good for him and he's out off some of dirty stuff Hollywood

[@qp4fg855]

It's not like it has been different at any point in time. There's a lot of actors and prominent people that are traumatized by their career or the circumstances of the career.

[@G-man45444]

I’m surprised they didn’t go to the national enquirer for their ‘evidence’ …. The way these lawyers treat witnesses is enough for me if I was on the jury to be swayed towards Johnny Depp side immediately.

[@samgibson684]

Don't worry... The jury "foreman" will browbeat everyone into a predecided outcome Been there......

[@sdking8781]

That would have been hilarious if they said right here in the national enquirer and page 10 right after the vampire boy there's an article that says Johnny Depp..... 😆

[@Eskey__]

@@sdking8781 EXTRA EXTRA! Bat kid confirms that Depp partied all night getting drunk and popping pills with Elvis.

[@madamedivaloach645]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@shaxxshelmet1938]

I’m pretty sure he quoted the Inquirer at one point

[@felloutthebushes13]

Since when did journalists write articles on TRUTH? Those questions were a bunch of bullsh!t

[@whyiseveryaliastaken]

Did you recall the article from 1912 that mentioned a sack of rice falling over in China?

[@garnetrose2528]

I just love how dismissive her team was on the witness. Can’t they let him finish speaking before asking the next question? Rude AF!!!

[@violablomsterbed9755]

The lawyer speaks with such stress it's painful to listen too

[@annyphoenix2099]

The wholenworld is jow watching him mess up, think his career will tank alongside hers and he can feel it

[@julienewman1761]

He sounds desperate as well.

[@unfortunatedisgrace246]

lmao best dude! love this guy and his realism and funny comments but with a great and professional attitude!

[@satyricon451]

“…Trying to trade on being a smarty pants…” indeed!

[@fireinateacup89]

"You don't have a crystal ball, is that right?" "Objection: speculation." ...does this woman have a crystal ball?!

[@Check-it-out]

I can’t endure hearing the voice of that lawyer anymore. Correct !

[@techwizpc4484]

If only someone at the court room will cry hearsay every time he talks.

[@philsoro491]

Ikr? He's so fucking annoying 🙄

[@erickaalvarez5278]

Bad bad bad lawyer!!!! Poor Amber Turd.. Watching from the Philippines...We love u Johnny!!!

[@andressatricolor]

WOW!! Where did she get this lawyer? he is hilarious and sad at the same time He is making a favour to Deep's attorneys every time he opens his mouth

[@LeQuast]

This lawyer gets me so furious..this defense is a absolute joke. "Johnny Depp is drinking alcohol..some shitty boulevard magazines sayed that" wtf is the point?

[@defeatSpace]

Amber hired a team to stop the Titanic from sinking, they're doing anything they can lol

[@geddoog3424]

It’s here! kzbin.info8pywBy_8iBo?feature=share

[@carlostejada1479]

I don't understand either... what else would those magazines write about?? there was only one side of the story. this trial is to clarify that those were gossips only. of course, gossip magazines write about gossips...

[@dazem8]

Trying to prove that his reputation was tarnished before Amber's accusations.

[@LeQuast]

@@dazem8 he is an actor for 30 years..of course there are postings about his behaviour and actions. This do not prove he is an abusive man. This defense is so lost.

[@MrsAjK13]

What I don’t understand is after finding out amber abused Johnny all she gets is limited screen time but still gets to be apart of aquaman 2? How is that? Didn’t johnny lose multiple movies due to her lies?

[@catonetreelamprughi9602]

She has a contract and depending on the stipulations of it pre dating this trial they may not be able to do much. But the movie may suffer once it hits theaters which means she'll be known as an actress that sinks films. So, whatever career she may have had is pretty much over.

[@sethparker3122]

Well the nice thing is now, assuming this trial goes his way, Johnny will get a bunch of her Aquaman money instead

[@bambilackner]

That’s why we the public need to make sure they make no money off this movie, if ppl just stick to their guns and even though they want to see it and not punish the other actors who worked in the film, it will show Hollywood we won’t tolerate this one sided shit when the real victim hasn’t worked and was cut from everything except a few things while the abuser gets to stay in a movie. What do they think ppl will show up and just not watch her ten minutes? I think what they’re going to do is have 5 minutes in the beginning and then again at the end thinking their playing ppl who believe if they show her in the first half they won’t have to see her the rest of the time. I guaranteed other ppl in it want us to boycott the shit and amber, they just can’t speak on that. But the minute their contracts are up they will.

[@bambilackner]

We also need to boycott advertisers who advertise on media sites that are spinning negative headlines and lies about Johnny and favoring amber. I think the reason they’re doing this is bc they also wrote lies about Johnny over the abuse allegations and their trying to win the public over in ambers defense hoping we will see her as the victim. No matter what they say or do it’s to late everyone heard those tapes and never once was Johnny physically abusing her, he was trying to get away. We heard her admit to hitting him. She comes off as a liar on the stand, she can’t even act, everyone sees right through it, now we know why she got parts in movies b4 Johnny married her.

[@Mildly_Dead]

What the fuck is wrong with this legal team? Did this dude really just imply that having the title of wife abuser is less damaging to once reputation then drunkard and "overpaid actor"?

[@steeletaylor8079]

Surprised there was no objection for the lawyer testifying.

[@erionafrancescasherifi4492]

It’s very strange. Does this lawyer want this guy to answer, or so long that the lawyer himself has done the questions he had in mind and gave himself the responses he wanted, he doesn’t care of what the witness is saying at all….????

[@owldepot]

I have thought this too. He asks questions like he's just ticking boxes and not really even listening to the answer, but the second the witness responds, he jumps on the answer (starts asking his next question) before the witness gets his last syllable out. He's such a boob.

[@caspar_gomez]

Yup

[@Blestyr]

They don't care what the answer is, they cleartly show it. They're just machine-gunning stupid questions to bait the witnesses into saying something stupid.

[@clownworld5474]

Have you ever watched a court case before? 😂😂

[@miwiarts]

Exactly.

[@thebearded4427]

How is quoting news articles not hearsay? I mean the reporters have no obligation to prove their speculations. A small news outlet can literally wrote anything without repercussions.

[@hortondlfn1994]

Quoting a news article is not hearsay because the article is on record - anyone can check whether it actually exists, and if it actually said what the witness claims it said. Further, unless they are editorializing or merely giving opinion, reporters definitely have an obligation to prove what they report, unless they want to face charges of libel. (That's a pretty simplistic explanation - the laws regarding slander, libel, and defamation are numerous.)

[@hauntedshadowslegacy2826]

Technically, it's not hearsay, but only because of why the articles are being presented. They're not being presented as fact, merely as reputational examples. Basically, Heard's team is trying to convince the jury that those articles were proof that Johnny's reputation was already trashed before Amber's article was posted. It doesn't work, though, because the expert witness (as well as anyone with more than 50 brain cells) knows that tabloids aren't worth the paper they're printed on. Hollywood doesn't listen to tabloids. Hollywood also doesn't care if an actor uses drugs or drinks heavily. TL;DR The articles aren't considered hearsay because they aren't being used to prove Johnny's deeds.

[@thebearded4427]

Thank you for the replies! Very informative and definitely expands upon my limited knowledge regarding the america law system!

[@GirishManeShine]

@@hauntedshadowslegacy2826 But then why would AH's op-ed be any different? Why did hollywood, as the witness mentiones, drew a line there?

[@ambercucu558]

Ok no hearsay, but def a Bs case to build off to anyone with brain cells left

[@margieshelnutt9006]

I loved this guy. He’s right! Who wouldn’t want a film to flop and gross 800 million. Sounds good to me. His point was since the ME TOO movement Hollywood will not tolerate any type of abuse towards Women. However, behavior such as being tardy, partying, doing drugs, and alcohol, arguing with individuals of the same sex is just considered DIVA/Artist behavior and is tolerated.

[@velder22]

Did she get her lawyers from the back pages oh, and she couldn't of spend very much money on these Stooges. I can't imagine these guys finding work after this trial