Johnny Depp Lawyer DESTROYS LYING Amber Heard Psychologist | Asmongold Reacts

[@SoTurtles]

the fact that she's considered board certified is terrifying to me

[@shahrezaDE]

💯💯

[@guardry1605]

After this she might not be for long

[@italiangirl2789]

Right? LOL

[@Bornintoclusterb]

Which is why it’s so hilarious that AH legal team keeps emphasizing that she’s board certified and Curry isn’t. 🤡🤡

[@guardry1605]

@@Do_Not_Lie Just as a board of phychiatrists can certify that she is professional and has a certain level of expertise within clinical psychology, they are just as easily able to remove their certification, if she's proven to have lied or bent the truth they could decide that she is too unprofessional and they can no longer guarantee that she can deliver a certain level of service to clients, they can meet and rescind the certification :)

[@dreadxcii2403]

The biggest takeaway I've had from this trial is that anyone can call themselves an expert

[@tonyrock123]

yes I earned thousands of dollars doing it. I'm in the wrong career Edit': and they earn thousands of dollars doing it..... I voice texted that one

[@MJans]

this is true. Its not a protected title and is only validified per situation and the criteria to judge the title differ situationally.

[@ryanchaney6226]

lol I totally agree. I have discovered that it seems as though all experts are trying to say alot of big words to try and trick me into believing their bs.

[@i_have_a_coat]

And if Mr. Dennison is around to hear that claim, he will shut that human being down.

[@ka.ka4325]

True and an expert seems to be the most confident in their own mind even if they're incorrect. I'm taking notes lol

[@chasitycaviness9057]

As someone with a degree in psychology, I am appalled. She needs to be investigated, and any case she was a witness for needs to deemed a mistrial.

[@michellestrachan372]

I was hoping to see someone who is in this field to comment bc I don't have psychology degree or background but this lady shouldn't be on any stand unless it was her being sued by clients she misled

[@rebekahvasquez1464]

I hope they aren't given a mistrial, but perhaps they should. I only say I hope not because she was an expert witness before this in the R Kelly case.

[@OOzd95]

Degree in Psychology? A Venti Latte please.

[@andreatakaki]

Unfortunately her “testimony” would not warrant a mistrial.

[@andreatakaki]

@@rebekahvasquez1464 Her “testimony”, unfortunately would not legally warrant a mistrial.

[@tocadiscox3]

The amount of "experts" this lawyer has taken down all by himself is simply impressive.

[@littlelily831]

Ultimate final boss.

[@booleah6357]

The wizard slayer is my favorite character in this anime

[@jeremiahmoynihan861]

It is, but he does have a team.

[@DanyPell]

lmfao

[@demoulius1529]

At the end of this whole shitshow he will have a bodycount xD

[@ariamaddison257]

This woman was able to talk a lot while saying nothing at the same time. To her credit she is in fact an expert, a word salad expert.

[@petertyper1]

Lmao

[@theresaheywood9479]

🤣🤣😅🤣

[@Whitey23]

Exacly

[@hmcredfed1836]

isn't that woman conversation standarts? "able to talk a lot while saying nothing at the same time".

[@hoang2312]

So basically a female Eric Dyson

[@dll7658]

Imagine - 25 years for a woman working so unprofessionally like that - just imagine all the innocent men and women whose cases have been negatively affected by her personal, unprofessional conduct. Not everyone has a good lawyer team like Johnny.

[@claudiagerber2921]

That’s chilling!

[@annacostello5181]

Oh I worked as a psych nurse. A certain subset of counselors/therapists are in the field to deal with their own psych issues (subconsciously). They can’t see their own inadequacy and mostly no one will ever call them out

[@dll7658]

@@claudiagerber2921 It is.

[@gailtrotman6843]

Especially men! She has a hate on for all men AND because of her biases against male Johnny Depp, she did not want to know the real Amber so she used shortcuts in her psychometric testing! Then, she listened to pathological liar, Amber Heard's self-reporting! She never met Amber in person, but did all her interviewing by ZOOM! THEN she was caught delivering her findings with notes! Now she wants to criticize Dr. Curry who brilliantly delivered a Master Class on Psychometric Testing, Mental Illnesses, Borderline Personality Disorder and Amber Heard's diagnosis specifically. I wonder if her license is being reviewed.

[@izzeypally]

@@katty5003 lol. asses. 🤣 sorry. I'll go away.

[@randyho8315]

This woman is the reason why there are a lot of innocent people in jail

[@cindyrussell1581]

True!

[@TonyP424]

agreed.....sadly

[@gompepadu9845]

Very true.

[@amandakay789]

THIS

[@mirlo2550]

Oh wow yeah that’s so true

[@anthonygomez3915]

Curry, even after everything, still called her Dr. Hughes. She’s calling her Shannon the first time she addresses her. Subtle hints as to how unprofessional these “experts” from Ambers side are.

[@thechoseone456]

Board certification is a joke. Hell, most doctorates are a joke.

[@Aeternus75]

@@thechoseone456 literally every doctorate you need medical school for beg to differ. God forbid we had incompetent surgeons or most doctors like that in general (If we did we likely wouldn’t be here.)

[@revelationreflection]

Telling, she was mad

[@LA-mz1dd]

She also referred to all victims as female. Absolutely telling

[@Piecesoftheshadow]

@@Aeternus75 You clearly don't understand what board certification truly is or means. Not having one doesn't make you NOT a doctor or a professional.

[@dominiccampbell181]

I find it absolutely amazing that Amber's expert witnesses all seem to be horrible people in their own rights.

[@Argumemnon]

I find it entirely expected.

[@Lei-AICPhD]

Right? And so rude! Like they’re already synced up with Elaine and Rottenborn as friends and willing to say or do whatever

[@ohmygodbecky6829]

When you hire people who will do anything for 💸💸💸, you collect a …specific crowd.

[@mariasondell3613]

Amen

[@jennyjohnson9579]

@@Lei-AICPhD Exactly!

[@Jarzula]

I seriously hope all the “experts” who lied on behalf of AH get their license suspended for a time. I don’t think they’re bad at their job, but they do need a reminder that it is NOT OK TO LIE IN COURT

[@actors504]

ARE YOU KIDDING THEY SUCK

[@toshiroyamada2443]

Yea having a clear bias against men as a psychologist is defiantly how you should behave as a medical professional.

[@sp00kyd4ddy6]

@@Dan.Hibiki and how does jail time not get them suspended

[@pale_saint]

No they’re useless in their jobs when they’re ready to twist the truth and manipulate results for a liar

[@CaspiRose99]

@@sp00kyd4ddy6 I mean I'm not sure if it does or not. Not practicing isn't the same as having your medical license suspended.

[@furlycee]

I just graduated with a master’s in forensic psychology and currently the field is very skeptical about violent risk assessment and the ethics of “predicting risks”, which is what this lady sounds like she’s using. Dr. Curry used the MMPI which is probably the most clinical, widely researched, and comprehensive of clinical tests today and Dr Curry interpreted those results incredibly nuanced and professionally.

[@vickywitton1008]

Well done you!🎓

[@KayKay114]

I think that's what Dr. Curry said about those tests as well. I thought she was wonderful 🥰

[@pamelaedwards6414]

Ok.

[@pamelaedwards6414]

Congratulations!! Reach for YOUR STARS!!!

[@Movu]

Congrats on graduating!

[@aaronmichelson5510]

Clinical psychologist here. I've done hundreds of C&P evaluations with veterans (non-forensic). First off, Hughes is an embarrassment to the profession, while Curry is a gem - she was fantastic. Second, Hughes thought she could give a bunch of clinical assessments for a forensic setting (other than maybe the PAI), while Curry used THE gold standard MMPI-2. Third, Hughes did not complete the CAPS-5 correctly, so it is invalid. (The PCL-5 is a joke for a forensic setting, especially with a pathological liar.) The first question in the CAPS-5 is VERY specific about index trauma, which means you have to clearly state the event that caused the trauma (e.g., a combat veteran who was shot in the leg during an ambush; sexual assault on X date; learned about your child being killed in a drive-by; etc.). "Complex trauma" is not exactly a thing (not in the DSM-5-TR), and usually refers to childhood trauma over a long period of time. Currently though, PTSD is related to one index event. Lastly, Hughes was correct about Curry overstating how debilitating PTSD is. PTSD exists on a spectrum, so somebody can still meet criteria and function very well. That is why in the VA we have a rating system for compensation (0/10/30/50/70/100%). Borderline Personality Disorder is usually associated with past trauma, so it's plausible that Amber does have a history of trauma. That is why it was so egregious to not specify the index trauma in the CAPS-5. Hughes disgusts me, for multiple reasons...

[@Fluer-de-Lis]

Thank you for this very detailed and professional insight.

[@jbritneff]

Very interesting, thanks for the insider explanations

[@orchidsdance]

I watched my mom go through domestic abuse when I was young. When there was an incident, my mom never antagonized her abuser. AH, in all the audio, antagonizes Johnny. She never seems like she is cowering or trying to get away from the abuse. In fact, running after her alleged abuser when he tries to get away. That is what really hits home for me.

[@kelliintexas3575]

EXACTLY. My dad was emotionally abusive to everyone, we learned how to tiptoe around, avoid conversations, avoid his "triggers". We sure as hell NEVER tried to set him off. We were only screamed at, berated & cussed out. Being "punched with rings repeatedly" you would be INSANE.

[@dustinrausch5008]

@@solea4945 And that's acting as if the concept of nuance doesn't exist. This was not a matter of Depp being shown to be repeatedly abusive and Amber being caught in one instance of fighting back; if anything, it's the opposite. Amber has shown a pattern of displaying absolutely no fear or anything even close to it in relation to Depp, save for one very obviously overplayed moment (at least only one I remember seeing), from the evidence we've seen to her behavior throughout the trial itself.

[@hilmaallen1302]

To me the person that was abused in this relationship and there was abuse, was Johnny Depp. He was the one trying to get away from his abuser. Johnny Depp never used to wear make-up before he met Amber Heard in public, ie: in normal life. Look back at his previous pictures with his other partners yet from he started his relationship with her he was always seen in public with make up on, people should think on that.

[@anastasiaconde2839]

Mines was her admitting to hitting him on recording. She sounded proud and defended the way in which she hit him that was a "Oh yea! she's the abuser.

[@ffeeniixx7194]

Amber's face is priceless. She's like we have one hour left and instead of defending me she's defending her own reputation. Even she's sick of hearing this woman talk

[@0ggyMild]

Bro Ambers reputation is relying on her reputation 😅 She needs the jurry to be convinced her expert isnt full of shit.

[@rsdouglass4]

Bingo

[@manchovieclemmons2380]

People tend to drift towards those who are like-minded, this is the result.

[@oguz091]

She looks like a future version of A.H, well the personality is already matching and looks wise A.H will come close in a few years.

[@candygirl7030]

Agree 💯

[@bezwaarikteken6637]

She ‘radiates’ very negative energy, she’s quick to defend when she’s asked a question, she’s demeaning when she’s responding to Depp’s lawyer and she shows signs of not being completely honest.

[@gailtrotman6843]

Yes, very defensive and not sure what the constant crimson color of her face is all about - anger and defensiveness? Aware that she was not fully professional cut corners with Amber every way she could? The two parties at hand are celebrities with JD being world renowned. His life, reputation and future are on the line and she's administering 1/2 assed tests and notating quote "DV Johnny" after ticking Yes, 5 times accusing Johnny of Amber's lies! Her license should be reviewed!

[@lordsathariel4384]

@@gailtrotman6843 after going through a couple of therapists the one who got me out of my depression explained to me a good amount of counselors/therapists pychiatrists an psychologists actually have some form of pychological instabilty or some other issue or variant and gravitate towards the feild based on that but she was really helpful dealing with my depression and made me realise that what i was experiancing was a form of ptsd. i think the one's who go into the feild without issues are probs gonna be the most helpful

[@ohmygodbecky6829]

You would think someone who works in psy would have a calmer and more peaceful mind, you know, like a HEALTHY MIND. But she seems constantly irritated or dissatisfied? Like the type that doesn’t take care of herself or others and is living like a bitter divorcee…and this person is board certified… This is like seeing a board certified dentist with gum piercings, a fake gold tooth, and lining their teeth with sugar as a snack before getting to work on you LMAO 😂

[@CorporateG0th]

He's using it against her. I'm just watching this now and 30:00 I'm calling it before I watch the rest, he's giving her rope to hang herself. He's getting her to strongly argue that the test can be applied retroactively over an indefinite period. His next move will be to argue, that she argued, that the results of the test can indicate trauma from the relationship or any other part of her youth.

[@booleah6357]

Ah but the real failure of this therapist is she didn't even talk to Johnny but tried to diagnose him and assume him to be the abuser. Pretty sure that's unethical and now that we learned about from Johnny's friendly psych it violates the Goldwater rule pretty hard.

[@mannymaurice972]

She’s violating everything just like Amber !

[@alexbarn3841]

Well really it’s not her diagnosing him, it’s about her just stating that domestic abuse absolutely happened and that it was perpetrated by Johnny, which is simply something that psychologists can’t possibly know.

[@burimsaliji23]

So true 😆 hope truth wins ,that's important 🙂

[@johnstrawb3521]

@Booleah Not a big believer in "the Goldwater Rule" as there are many occasions when it should be rejected, but the contrast here between the slug on the stand versus Dr. Curry and her detailed, supported diagnosis of Heard is really quite shocking. Depp's friends and witnesses are restrained, competent, appear honest and forthright, whereas Heard's look like carnies out for your last buck.

[@Kim-tr5op]

@@alexbarn3841 no she gave a professional opinion about Johnny Depp without doing any research herself

[@edwardnguyen7913]

I like it when the psychiatrist kept talking about guidline until JD's lawyer threw the guidline at her face. Totally boss move.

[@witchcraftdahlia4789]

@Bobbi Cat The only REAL difference between the professions is that psychiatrists can prescribe medication and psychologists only evaluate.

[@marie-michelleanderson2851]

@@witchcraftdahlia4789 Bigger difference is that psychiatrists are actually medical doctors as well. That is why they can prescribe medications.

[@THETowandAA]

I would have loved for him to go to the pourcentile part " you said Dr Curry had to just read the manual to know you don't use the pourcentile in this test .... the fuck it is ?"

[@TheHappyPotatoe]

Yup she quickly changed her tune on guidelines then lol

[@CrystalShadow]

@@marie-michelleanderson2851doesn’t make them better

[@TheSinner1123]

While obtaining my BS in psychology, i did an internship at a childrens hospital. I was able to assist in administering these types (not specifically these) of tests to clients. One time, i neglected to fill in a box due to the question not pertaining to the client(i did not administer the test, simply assisted). The psychologist i was interning with GRILLED me to NEVER leave a box plank. The psychologist lectured me for what felt like hours, on why you never leave ANY box blank, no matter how insignificant it may be. My education on these tests are limited, and my scope of the field is limited. But the one thing I can say for certain, is that failing to document anything in those boxes, is negligence and malpractice.

[@ffeeniixx7194]

This "expert" has such a beef with Dr curry. She's setting herself up as the villain in an epic anime where curry destroys her with verbal beat downs

[@FEKana]

@@fish5645 Not sure what her appearance has to do with her testimony being awful but that isn't the point. Doctor Curry is just far more articulate and doesn't try to seem condescending unlike this psychologist

[@moonlitskylight5740]

@@FEKana well, it's shallow yes, but humans are physical beings. It's 95% her intelligence and professionalism, but she's also gorgeous.

[@idrissb9742]

@@moonlitskylight5740 exactly, it helps to be goodlooking in this world and it WILL affect opinions :p

[@stephanieann6622]

Exactly. She's not even caring about her patients. It's about the beef. Not them

[@Axelvoxel]

Because she’s prettier. Deep down it’s the only reason

[@rlawrence9838]

It would've saved us a lot of time if this woman had just said, "I'm stupid enough to believe Amber Heard, Dr Curry isn't.

[@mannymaurice972]

💯

[@ri9596]

Absolutely 👍

[@B4L-777]

Especially given the fact she gave her the "answers" and asked if she "feels" any of these. A self-assessment. What a joke.

[@mannymaurice972]

@@B4L-777 and years after she was with Johnny and had already been with Elon ! And pregnant lol

[@rlawrence9838]

@@mannymaurice972 She was never pregnant, the baby was had by a surrogate. And I've only heard people online express concern for the child's well-being, not threaten it, I'm not saying it's impossible but it is Amber (my lies are finally being) Heard.

[@InteliLEX]

Law firms actually have lawyers like this specifically - They are called known as “A Fixer” And this man is doing a fabulous job of demonstrating the art of “fixing” & illustrating exactly how brutally effective they can be to a legal team…. A Master Class.

[@TheTownNarcoleptic]

So they’re the guys who set the record straight? Damn. I’d be sweating up a storm testifying in any court case if I knew that I was gonna be cross-examined by the opposing team’s fixer.

[@InteliLEX]

@@TheTownNarcoleptic absolutely - This guy really was a super valuable secret weapon

[@voids4818]

@@InteliLEX Dennison is a wonderful attorney. He destroyed most of AH’s “experts” with ease.

[@piratequeenucyra6690]

Wait...so the show scandal was real? :D

[@philip9823]

When an academic expert calls another expert “confused,” it’s a pretty big diss. She needs to calm herself down.

[@sharonhudzick9433]

It’s extremely unprofessional….if I was a juror I would discount anything she says due to the lack of professionalism

[@optimusgrine2362]

Did not refer to her as ‘Doctor’ Curry, only Shannon Curry. The ❤️’ly Dr Shannon Curry completely slow rolled this woman

[@Lemieux_7]

Her insults come back on her

[@charlesc4511]

I wonder if she thinks it worth destroying her career over Amber Heard.

[@jordyjohn2275]

There’s always a market for mercenaries like her. Not everyone has a crack legal team like JD

[@Tungsten96]

She's getting paid in Elon credits. 🤣

[@randomperson-up5vt]

Oh her ego is what's fueling her. She hates being called out.

[@SereneAncalime]

Nah as per the first round of questioning. This is her job. She well keep getting hired for the exact same cases forever

[@hawaiifiveohoh]

Ego is a helluva *drug

[@jenclark777]

That "expert" is so wrong. That lady is so lying. I've been through the whole PTSD testing twice because I moved and had to change doctors. What she said is a full legal assessment is not.

[@TheOnlyCarlos]

So she purposely used tests that benefitted or would give AH the best chance at receiving the results they were looking for? Not only is that unethical, she literally outed herself to disregarding the rules set to make sure that patients are properly diagnosed. Imagine a surgical doctor doing this same exact thing, " I know this sheet states to only look at the past year but I instructed the patient to use their whole life as a timeframe and determined they need open heart surgery within the next week or they'll die ". I wouldn't be surprised if she gets investigated for falsifying her records tbh, Imagine the people she misdiagnoses or doesn't diagnose properly just because she instructs them to do something other than what is stated on the test themselves.

[@skagenpige88]

The problem here is that in most trials those things work, normal people cant afford lawyers like Depp could...and she gets away with all of it for an amazing salery and ruin ppl's lives.

[@matthewserrao2926]

Crazy how Amber has shown no symptoms of PTSD while hearing her alleged abuse recounted or while recounting it herself. I’ve never seen a victim of PTSD openly able to discuss and hear the causation of their PTSD discussed without any symptoms emerging. How odd

[@officialmkamzeemwatela]

Right? It’s almost like she’s….. lying?😳🤣

[@2wyzegaming97]

Honestly I’ve been around victims They don’t exactly struggle to shed real tears 🙄

[@bosmatzaidenband7865]

i think she tried to make it look like she has PTSD (it was when johnny was "assulting" cabinantes i think)

[@stephanieann6622]

Staring at her victim smirking at him. Such PTSD. I can't even listen to my assaulters songs, see his face, hear his name without having PTSD "flare ups"

[@Jarzula]

@@bosmatzaidenband7865 I seen that. She really twitched but it was on demand and wasn’t random. She even tried to zone out at one point when they were explaining it last time but she failed because she has them “coke eyes” and they’re all over the place. Idk the actual term but people who do drugs do have REM that they don’t even notice or feel.

[@fabulousat40beauty]

I am a nurse , and was assulted by a patient in december . I was brutally beaten, and now have real ptsd. When i was referred to my psychologist, i was given a survey to fill out about my symptoms. Then i was tested on many different things. I had to undergo memory testing, such as “ how many things can you name with the letter d “ just as an example. Telling me a passage of words , ans after a min of being told them was asked to repeat. This woman is manipulating her results. And trying to save her ass

[@BK-uf6qr]

Hope your better or getting better.

[@fabulousat40beauty]

@@BK-uf6qr tysm! I’m in therapy, still dealing with pretty severe ptsd. But trying. Stay blessed🙏

[@Retrobeemer]

The arrogance of this woman is seriously next level. The rules simply don’t apply to her, or so she believes. Her notes were lies relayed to her by AH and nothing more.

[@amyd369]

In this field the biggest thing is paperwork paperwork paperwork. For her not to fill it out is insulting to us who do

[@JohnnyTromboner]

I especially like how her face got more and more red lol

[@WaitingForYukiOnna]

I don't think her notes were the problem. It's that her testimony is very inconsistent with our observations of Amber Heard's behavior during the 26 days of trial. Conversely, Dr. Curry, whom she is adamant is wrong basically predicted everything Amber would do in the trial like it was a prophecy. It makes Dr. Hughes look highly incompetent.

[@AfricanLionBat]

The thumbnail for this video is fantastic

[@evieparrott]

Plus how do we know her notes follow the standards! This so called professional needs to get a grip

[@irollneed]

Johnny Depp's lawyer has earned the *Expert Destroyer* title! What a legend!

[@petertyper1]

He’s a son of a gun

[@ultikfa8971]

So, Dr. Hughes used a test that it specifically designed to evaluate the PAST YEAR of a relationship, but she used this test for a different date of her choosing? Wouldn't this be malpractice? The instruction manual sounds pretty clear to me. There is probably a good reason why the instructions say to use it ONLY for the past year, right? They don't just write such specific stuff in there for fun, RIGHT?

[@meggers1771]

Not only can the symptoms change, but there can also be other events that contribute to the results of the test. Having it be within a year of administering the test is incredibly important. She's not a dumb woman, she knows this and is talking around it. People will say whatever you want them to for money its gross.

[@Digmer]

Past year, her thinking was "welp, 5 years ago was a pasr year so lets do it"

[@4Mr.Crowley2]

This woman is WRONG - there *are* patients who “malinger” by feigning symptoms particular to a specific condition. She is trying to claim that they makes all sorts of claims - not necessarily specific. That is just wrong. She is also irritating, obviously in a bad mood (not very professional), and a poor speaker, and I hope the jury is tuning her out.

[@eddypuentes6155]

aleister crowley you can't argue with this woman she's an expert. This is what an expert like her looks like ---> 🤥 🤡.

[@mtaus7337]

haha, like there is no such patients who malinger symptoms to for eg. achive perscriptions for some drugs like aderal, or such xD not-at-all.

[@jawaragreaves6220]

That's what I find funny she basically said curry isn't wrong but is trying to prove her side is right I'm lost

[@dustinrausch5008]

This case is also being streamed by a lawtuber called Emily D. Baker, and after the testimonies on this day, she talked to another lawtuber for awhile, a guy called Runkle of the Bailey, who's actually been present in the courtroom (for this day, he's the guy in the blue suit with long white hair; at the start of this video you can see him right past Elaine). Anyway, he was largely there to gauge the jury responses; apparently, none of them seemed very convinced by Hughes, and at least one was shaking her head a lot throughout her testimony.

[@jennifermarshall4780]

I agree. Karla Homolka perfect example of this!

[@Subarashii_Nem]

She's only there again because she's jealous of Dr. Curry and the respect she earned by being an actual psychologist with no bias, great at her job, people actually love her and she proved beyond reasonable doubt that this woman is incompetent at best and a straight up liar, fraud and law breaker at worst. Also Dr. Curry shut down the lawyers when they tried to spin her testimony into something it's not. She has the confidence and ability to stand her ground completely on her own merit and not sound like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum.

[@OvelNick]

No one else is saying it but.... It's psychology. Dr Curry is the more gorgeous, sexy ALONG with all of those things you listed as well. It's only human nature to know of someone that might be your academic and intellectual equal and when you see the physical differences are that starkly different you think, "well fuck... This is some bullshit." lol.

[@tomdodson6293]

Yep, because she’s not a liar she’s just doing her job and being honest

[@Teriteri22]

@@utmastuh yes! Same sex based Statement ruined it

[@pale_saint]

@@OvelNick this one is willing to lie and manipulate for Amber just because she’s a female too, not a good look

[@alexbarn3841]

I don’t know about Curry being unbiased, but her methods were certainly more ethical and proper. Even if she is biased she used tests that don’t really even take the examiners bias into account. I think there’s always a clear bias when someone is being paid by one side to provide data, I think the only one that really wasn’t biased was Mr. Schnell he just gave them data, however that data turned out to be basically useless because he was given bad info and a bad task.

[@debrabarber3483]

She didn't even fill in the form right. That's next level unethical. She should lose her licence for that alone

[@WadeWilson616]

As a veteran with PTSD w/sever anxiety the way this lady operates makes me feel like she is attaching PTSD to things which would diminish how people view persons with PTSD.

[@badomen9057]

Totally agree, it is great that recently mental health in general has been receiving more recognition however it is sickening To see how some people lie about it and use it for their own benefit.

[@trinnysaysno]

I'm a veteran too and it's terrifying! Makes me wonder what her diagnosis iss and how many Dr's I've told all stuffed too what were their diagnosis?

[@dll7658]

Had a neighbor who was a veteran with PTSD before. And was diagnosed myself with bipolar. I feel like I know what you mean.

[@GenXDoll1972]

Not a vet but I have friends who are that have PTSD and I have PTSD from things in my past, this "doctor" pisses me off for all of us! She is absolutely one of those that twists what actual PTSD is. It is disgusting!

[@lindaarrington9397]

Agree I have it and it's ruff watching

[@twovillages7168]

I think its telling that, in general, Johnny's witnesses are usually easy to understand and follow, despite using complicated terms and processes. Amber Heard's witnesses on the other hand, seems to throw big words and processes around in a vague way that skirts around the issue in an effort to purposefully confuses those listening.

[@aboutthat1440]

A spot on comment.

[@nicolebolick9663]

Her witnesses and team come across as bad Disney villains!

[@dll7658]

And also avoid discussing the specifics which will be damning to them. They try instead to create an illusion of the validity of their claims, or on the shade they throw at others when they are in fact unfounded

[@Ara_Arasaka]

I hope nothing but the worst for “doctor” Hughes. Genuinely. What a dangerous woman. To be in a position like that and be giving out wrong tests, miscategorizing and mistreating patients potentially with mind altering drugs they don’t even need just because she has an obvious agenda. That’s horrible. She and all of Amber’s team should be investigated. Thoroughly. These people are DANGEROUS.

[@lindacousins9603]

I can imagine she it used by authorities, I hope now families will ask for her to be replaced

[@DeadmanPoet]

It is amazing how many people this case is offending. I am slighted as someone who has a ptsd diagnosis when I separated the military. I went through 4 different antidepressant medications, gained 100lbs from the meds and lack of interest in trying, constantly contemplating life and asking my subconscious why, distrusting everyone and losing all of my friends (still dont feel like I need friends, and still dont trust anyone except my wife and son), and I contact my parent/sister/family MAYBE once a year sometimes less. Thanks to trying different med combinations I have found a combo that allows me to function better than I have the last 4 year. I would not even be able to write this if I was without my care This doctor doesn't deserve her license imo, and needs to be extensively evaluated before being allowed to practice Psychology. Actual severe depression and PTSD is very much disabling. Edit: I also want to add that it took 3 years of weekly therapy sessions before my psychiatrist gave me a PTSD diagnosis . The diagnosis changed several times throughout the three years from depressive disorder, to major depression with anxiety then to PTSD. My doctor eliminated any other possibilities before giving it the PTSD diagnosis.

[@KHONAMII]

💯 💯

[@vickywitton1008]

I hope your life keeps getting better, you deserve it mate!❤❤

[@Keepingitreal1971]

I’ve been diagnosed with c-ptsd and I totally agree with the symptoms your talking about as Trauma I suffered was so severe I lost all hope in my heart and basically shut down and the repeated trauma thoughts over and over again for years which I had no control over it and it was completely debilitating to say the least . I haven’t been able to hold a regular full time job in years since experiencing this intense trauma .. which I used to socialize and be around social scenes and now I isolate cause I feel safe.. The trauma I experienced was due to 7 year smear campaign on me by my ex-husband along with him using our kids as pawns to cause harm to my life by projecting his abusive behaviors towards me and our kids onto me making me the abuser and it ruined my life as I was so severely paralyzed with anxiety and mental and emotional dealing with the betrayal of close friends and family and others in our town believing this smear campaign and not ever seeing anything with their own eyes so the smear campaign turned into disgusting gossip throughout the town and it was so hurtful and along with this I was in mental pain cause my ex lied about his actions to our children and he also made our kids lie about me to further the belief of his smearing .. so I suffered so much as my kids didn’t ever deserve this and it is not right . My ex was out to ruin my life for me leaving him due to mental emotional financial and sexual abuse .. a decade of my life was so painful . I believe Johnny was set up my Amber and she’s a liar clearly . Sickening these evil people ..

[@bigham1997]

Thank you for your service. I totally agree with you. I have many friends that do have PTSD and it is and can be debilitating it does take a while to find the correct medications that do help our military be able to enjoy some parts of life again. I’m very happy for you to have the people your trust around you

[@stephaniefarley1236]

First I want to say thank you and God Bless for your selfless service. I'm sorry that you have suffered ill affects. I'm glad you found something that helped you because I know firsthand some don't find that help and even worse I've known some who refused any help offered. I can't imagine what you went through so truly I am grateful for heroes like you. As for the lady who testified I agree she shouldn't have a licence and I feel whole heartedly that she should never be allowed to practice medicine again. From the way she spoke she's not helping anyone and I fear could hurt them. Same for the male psychiatrist but in my opinion he might be worse.

[@CL_Hat]

She was literally yelling her testimony at the jury, I would be so done with this lady. She is answering and explaining all her line of questioning looking at the jury in a completely argumentative tone. Good luck with that.

[@cindyrussell1581]

She took a page right out of turds book. They both want the jurors to believe them.

[@marimar8175]

Omg I know! She looks so angry and almost yelling out her response. No respect or professionalism.

[@laporziuncula]

I’ve read at least three of the jurors were checked out when she went back up on the stand

[@newbienorris]

Wayne has such a brilliant way of making the witnesses look like idiots 🤣🤣👌

[@Heydan164]

I love how that one Wizard Destroyer's roll in all this is to be the expert of experts and put their fraudulent claims out there to the world. The guy is a friggin legend.

[@artnull13]

So what we gathered was she came to her diagnosis before performing all the required assessments i.e. CONFIRMATION BIAS She failed to complete the required assessments properly She failed to use assessments properly as per the explicit instructions. How is this lady 1. Board certified 2. President of anything let alone trauma 3. Allowed to practice?

[@randomperson-up5vt]

Every box needs to checked, filled out, or noted not valid if for some reason that happens. If you have a large box to write out numerous things but don't because you have reports. Then state the reports are attached in another document or email, not leaving a box blank.

[@TheZerosd]

Connections nothing else nothing more...

[@artnull13]

@@randomperson-up5vt of course - a medical document is a legal document. She knows this.

[@CrystallynRose]

@@randomperson-up5vt The fact that she seems to expect the jury to pull the pertinent information from her 88 pages of notes is utterly ridiculous. Especially since they're likely not psychologists and wouldn't even know what to look for. The fact she didn't fill out the form properly tells me that either she's lazy, doesn't think the rules apply to her or she's purposefully hiding something. Or potentially all three. I hope the jury looks at it the same way.

[@norakennedy4670]

This lawyer.....deserved way more credit than he got. I think he had th hardest job out of all the other lawyers.

[@Seaneey]

This made her look even less credible than before.

[@realtruth6406]

This woman is making a mockery of true domestic violence victims. She makes me sick!! is that US Justice system ? Law must above everything , everyone.. Shame

[@zerg113]

Lmao you should see it in the uk. In uk they made johnny the abuser with 0 proof. US justice system is about to give amber a loss.

[@djtoxicdhg]

Yea it's sad we get fucked hard in the us

[@Artsificial]

Agreed.

[@Insanity_Wolf]

The US justice system is very corrupt. Especially so in domestic and civil cases. There are a handful of very amazing judges though. The bias towards women in the justice system is even worse in most cases than you see here. Most men can't even get a trial like this. They just have to live with the consequences of false accusations. On top of cases involving divorce, in only 3% of cases does the man walk out the benefactor (alimony, child custody, recipient of child support, acquiring of spouses assets.)

[@carolross1517]

Agree 💯

[@Fatemaforlife]

Ironically her taking the stand actually helped Depp's case a lot.

[@Bama_girl_41]

As with many of AH's professional witnesses.

[@ThePrefessional]

This is literally insane that she is an expert! A standardized test is exactly that. When I was in law enforcement if you deviated AT ALL from a standardized test it was thrown out. LIKE THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS. How is she on a board and considered an expert when she is literally not following directions on the simplest of things. I hope this woman gets removed from her status. A joke

[@melt2947]

She is an expert liar

[@YLLWBLCK]

"You said that we should read the manual, would you also agree with me that we need to read the directions?" I loved that one 🤣

[@lesterschild1065]

"Sure" she says 😂, man if I was or is a patient of that woman's I'd be questioning so many things 😂

[@RichardHubbuck]

I was a military police detective for 20 years (well, we weren't called detectives, but you get the point) and dealt with the recording of expert evidence for the purpose of production at court on many, many occasions. I'll say just this: the fact that this doctor *KNEW* that the material recorded during her consultations with AH would be produced for this trial is a travesty in terms of her trying to explain away the "88 pages of notes." Why? Because of one factor: the opposing counsel will simply bring up your slovenly attitude towards filling in official forms and reports. And wouldn't you know it - the psychologist was humiliated on two separate occasions for this exact reason. All it does is demonstrate a blasé attitude to the task at hand. She may well have 88 pages of notes, but it means sweet FA when the opposing counsel is berating you on the stand for not doing something as simple as filling in a box with a number. Some may question, 'why even have the box at all, then?!' As a specialist interviewer myself, I interviewed child and adult victims of rape, sexual assault and serious physical assaults; the fact that I recorded pages and pages of notes was a good thing - but they were my reference when compiling relevant reports. Yes, those notes were admitted as 'unused material' when the evidence bundles were forwarded to the prosecution, but the notes weren't the things being examined at court - the video recordings were, or the report was. For this psychologist to turn around and say, 'yes, but my 88 pages of notes blah, blah, blah' means absolutely nothing. What is being looked at/questioned? Yes, that's right - the report itself. So, to try and argue the toss that relevant points were scored for a diagnosis - where the notes are scribbled all over the form like a small child with a crayon, is shocking for an 'expert' charging $1000 per hour. Indeed, the time frames used in the examinations are relevant; you brought up the best example to prove this, when you discussed the origin of the PTSD and how the shrink fitted that into the alleged IPV complaint. It doesn't fit - it would never work. The best defence AH had, which would have worked, would have been to say, "I was violent towards Johnny because PTSD made me do it - the PTSD that was caused by my father abusing me as a child... ...ergo, it's not really my fault blah, blah, blah." Instead, AH, with the help of this shrink, purported that her mental suffering was caused as a result of the alleged IPV. Your subsequent point is correct - how does she know she suffers from PTSD from the alleged IPV involving Johnny, when she suffered at the hands of her father as a child?

[@Victoria-nu9jb]

This Psychiatrist is an example of an employee who won Employee of the year ones, and then took that as validity for superiority.

[@pale_saint]

She won them only being the most visible and loud

[@justonegreatday]

nah not even, she got a participation award and act like she got first place

[@maxit933]

More like improvement award

[@LanaRedmond13]

He should have asked “You make $- an hour for your testimony and yet you can’t even manage to fill in all the paperwork?”

[@daphnedevine]

I think he said something close her 1st time on the stand 😉

[@LanaRedmond13]

@@daphnedevine 👍

[@stasianitzouvara3114]

I've watched this trial so many times and I still get the same satisfaction watching the wizard destroyer into action. *chef's kiss*

[@theyshouldhavenevergivenme5439]

She comes off as extremely biased no matter who’s right about the technicalities of the testing. On top of that for a psychologist she’s just has an extremely unpleasant and comes off as overly authoritative. She also lacks the ‘stoicism’ one would associate with someone of this level. She was triggered the first time and now she comes off as super triggered. There is a reason for the universal dislike of this woman and it’s not because she’s testifying for AH. Imho this Is just a high functioning Karen

[@jenjennitrite8146]

I concur 💯!

[@sallymascorro]

Perfectly said 👏

[@youtubeismytimemachine5917]

Doctor Curry didn't seem at all confused. This doctor on the other hand seemed to manipulate testing in order to come up with a PTSD diagnosis.

[@channaborman6736]

The expert kept talking about using the test in a clinical setting. She was working this case in a FORENSIC setting. Ugh. So frustrating.

[@katrinafrench6348]

This woman triggers me & you said it spot on. Get her off the stand! I'll say it again for the people in the back, you are the company you keep. Notice how Amber's whole team is rude & combative. While Johnny's team is nice & respectful!

[@andersonbarnett4245]

I wish that they could bring in a neutral expert in psychiatric testing. One problem with abusive & manipulative people is that they manipulate both the professionals conducting the tests as well as the tests themselves. Occasionally they lie to themselves as well. My ex was evaluated on 4 occasions within 12 months by 3 psychologists and each time he had a completely different personality. One psychologist concluded that he was the victim not the abuser, even though he was being given free anger management help by the DV shelter. Another concluded that he wasn't intelligent enough to lie or deceive psychologists. Yet another concluded that he wasn't aware, had amnesia etc. Finally they said we can't help him because we can't find out which personality is the true person and which is fabricated. Different tests results even completely opposing results do not prove one expert to by incompetent. It proves that the subject being tested is smart enough to understanding the purpose of each question then give answers that we lead to the outcome they choose. I'm not saying that's she educated, just a practiced manipulator.

[@McPeror]

Neutral experts provided by court make too much sense and don't benefit the rich that can hire experts to lie for them.

[@andersonbarnett4245]

@@McPeror true enough Even if they'd had a 3rd party administer one test and sent individual copies to each side's psych expert for interpretation, it just would eliminate so much ambiguity and wasted time. As you say though, that kind of clarity doesn't benefit the wealthy.

[@afelias]

Dr. Curry's testimony prior showed that the test methodology accounts for this. There are deliberate questions placed there that would assume that your PTSD is so extreme that it's unbelievable. If you answer positively to too many of those questions, you're likely not to have PTSD, but are feigning or exaggerating. (Which doesn't mean you're necessarily a liar - it can mean that you don't have a grasp of reality which is a completely different problem, or that you were kinda psyche-ing yourself out on something and exaggerating.) That's also why further interviews (which are also in that manual) are recommended. Dr. Curry said she would have done further testing, herself, but Amber was uncooperative and she had a time limit. Amber Heard tripped all the false positives. The test clearly shows she's feigning/exaggerating. It's her expert, Dr. Hughes, who is misrepresenting the test results.

[@Laeuskong]

We had a similar situation in our family, you see, my lil sis was kind of highly hormonal growing up, lying and manipulating while being a complete monster who couldn't take a "no". My parents paid for years for a psychologist that ended up "befriended" my sister and took everything my sis was saying about us as truth and wouldn't push her or doubt her, she even started saying WE were the real problem and that my sis was totally normal and okay. Lets just resume and say that this psychologist is not working anymore. LOL. just sucks she sucked thousands of dollars out of my family for nothing.

[@andersonbarnett4245]

@@Laeuskong That's horrible. Is your sister on good terms with the family now?

[@Superanima7]

Good Point Asmon! She is contradicting her previous testimony to save her credibility in her profession with disrespect for the trial. Also yes she blended her overall assessment from Ms Turd’s childhood and her time with Mr Depp

[@ivechang6720]

Also any proceedings that used her as "expert testimony" are now going to be closely scrutinized. What a gift JD and his lawyers have just given to at least fifty cases!

[@thespanishinquisition4078]

Fun fact: that's not really gonna happen... Because it's already happened. She's already been impeached on the last trial she took part in. And if you look at the reasons given by the court, it's literally 100% what she's done AGAIN. This dum ass already got fucked for pulling this crap and she's still not learning! She deserves to get disbarred by this point.

[@lesterschild1065]

Or at least should be scrutinized hard.

[@lauradavis8949]

YEEAH! THIS HAS SHOWN WHAT BAD DRs LOOK LIKE

[@Maiden_to_mother]

She gave Amber a fucking check list lol I can’t believe she’s seriously up there again. These people are so fucking sickening

[@booleah6357]

I can't wait for smeagols rebuttal if he even gets one. That dude didn't even know what the rule he was quoting was 🤣

[@mariejenkins-stephens6176]

🤣🤣

[@STP255]

Thank you 🙏🏽 like someone needs to remind the jury how invalid are her methods of diagnosis lol

[@ChickenKhorma]

@@booleah6357 Nah, they're out of time. I would pay good money for him to drop an angry reply vlog through a shitty laptop webcam on his own though, that would be amazing. He could use it as a springboard to start his own Flat Earth channel!

[@booleah6357]

@@ChickenKhorma sad I would have loved to see a wizards durl

[@vickywitton1008]

Love the fact that so many professionals are calling her a charlatan!

[@screamingbennett882]

As someone with PTSD, I see the shell shock that results soon after traumatic events from it in Johnny. It is very obvious that he is stressed to be there, but he needs lawful validation that tells him he's not imagining the entire ordeal. Amber may have PTSD, but I personally don't see any signs of recent trauma in her behavior.

[@afelias]

I came from the Nick Rekieta stream, someone there said "I am an actual war veteran and I've been diagnosed with PTSD, and even I didn't score as high as Amber did." Dr. Curry showed that Amber scored so high on the PTSD tests that it was suspicious, and she tripped all the "false positive" questions that were so ludicrous that they were designed to detect people faking PTSD. That's what Dr. Hughes is hiding, is that Dr. Curry caught her either lying about Amber's results or being so stupid that she didn't see the pattern first, despite being her psych for like half a decade.

[@jeanhartely]

Interesting. According to Dr. Curry's testimony, Johnny Depp seems to be showing more signs of PTSD than Amber Heard.

[@jennibee3842]

I am 53 years old and not a gamer. You have done such a fantastic job on this . I love listening to your analysis . I will miss this when it's over . I will have to check in and hear what you are up to though. Tomorrow- closing arguments! Then the jury gets it Tuesday.

[@virtualasylum7013]

I agree...I only found his channel through this trial as I am not a gamer either. He has done a fantastic job...he is my go-to for this trial.

[@jennibee3842]

@@virtualasylum7013 yeah mine too! I also like popcorned planet. But I like asmongolds attitude and how he listens to everything and make his commentary. He actually picks up on so many things and nuances that I totally miss. It's really something because I'm listening yet miss a lot. Hahaha he fills me in on way too much - I apparently suck at listening

[@hiropisku1078]

The power of this man, this lawyer, is too great. The second you cross this man, your career is already dead. Never skip procedure folks. Don't expect to lie your way out. If you give a good lawyer an inch, they'll have you eating out of a soup can.

[@Tommy9834]

I think she IS a legitimate expert on PTSD, because I'm sure she got PTSD from the last time she was on the stand.

[@lauchilos123]

I can't believe they didn't ask her about how she expects the jury to go trough her 88 pages of notes when reviewing her documents consider to be from an expert in her field. Which many don't really understand. That would help the jury understand how unprofessional she is and how she is wasting their time on purpose to save herself some time on work she is paid an extreme fee.

[@daphnedevine]

Don't forget the boxes she left blank because SHE knows what goes in them. Screw what the Jury needs! That's a PAID for professional my friend !

[@simso1o]

Yes ... I was surprised they didn't make more of that just to push the point home.

[@VictorianEvening]

Dennison already went over that the first time he crossed her. He called her out on it then.

[@JeanetteoftheLordJesusChrist]

She is sloppy...as sloppy as the other lawyers of AH.

[@JeanetteoftheLordJesusChrist]

They are dummies playing with people to fall into their trap of rethorics

[@doctortimm3245]

Gotta love it - when she was up for the defense she said to read the manual, then she gets cross-examined and agrees that the tests should be administered with instructions, then goes on to basically say that the directions don't REALLY have to be followed just follow her notes - all 88 pages of them! No footnotes or anything, you just gotta read them all and find the relevant parts! I gotta try that next time I file my taxes; just fill out my name and include my w2 info and let the IRS figure it out!

[@subtlesong8936]

When administering a psychological assessment, you are required to stick to the script as stated. The wording and everything included within the assessment must be used as presented. A reframing of a test pretty much eliminates all reliability that the test has. So yes, this doctor's assessments are completely null and void.

[@lolilikedragons3528]

I feel like alot of adminstered assessments have a bunch of rules on it for a reason. I understand not wanting to be anal and taking forever. But when it comes to assessments you need to treat them like tests. Follow the rules and use your profession to best ask and answer questions whilst marking what is needed. Just because she has all these credentials does NOT EXEMPT her from skipping huge steps in these tests.

[@subtlesong8936]

@@lolilikedragons3528 That is absolutely true. The tests are created with that language on purpose. All of the tests and research done by the APA and other organizations have been iterated a vast quantity of times to find the best way to phrase things. Just like Asmon said at the end, Science is something that is iterative and just because it occurs once doesn't mean it will happen again. Which is why only utilizing the one assessment before making the diagnosis is problematic.

[@CrystallynRose]

Especially knowing this was going to trial you'd think she'd want to fill it out fully so that there's no question to her credibility. I know that's what I'd do.

[@clarinetmaster5990]

Fr. Pretty much one of the first things everyone learns in Stats 101 is to word survey questions in a way that won’t manipulate the outcome.

[@WindingDreams]

Wizard Destroyer: You shouldnt use this as a diagnostic tool. Board Certified Witch: Correct, I used a lot of other tests. WD: You used the tests wrong. My man is just flinging counterspells like crazy..

[@freddyejeancarter1816]

Ahhhh lol 😂

[@mollyvital]

Johnnys Attorney deserved way way way more attention and praise, he was very impressive!!! 😮

[@SpaazMok]

Dennison is going to be forever haunting the memories of those who tried to stand up to him. The Anti Wizard stands eternal.

[@rulzzzzzz]

@𝓈𝒽𝒾𝓋𝓋𝓎 Wayne F Dennison

[@albertko1]

The "OK" counterspell 🤣

[@baoz2998]

Batman

[@Piecesoftheshadow]

Him and Camille.

[@xtremefurrycat]

PTSD sucks, I don't like having something happen throwing me into a panic. This lady really needs to stop showing up in courtrooms she doesn't seem to know what she is talking about other than females are always the victims.

[@daphnedevine]

It's all about the $$$$ my friend! Shameful isn't it?.

[@Lemieux_7]

Yes. She represents the bias that society has in general. Always believe the woman is no longer an appropriate slogan

[@sherryjohnson3804]

I always thought that was ridiculous, guilty till proven innocent, I think of my dad, brothers and son, and how horrible it must be to be a man falsely accused

[@rhm987]

I agree. I am a female with PTSD and am highly aggravated and offended by her lackadaisical/egotistical approach to diagnosing someone with the condition. It is just another condition or term that will trivialized via overuse.

[@pale_saint]

Yes and that’s a lie because often times females are the abusers

[@bloodyneptune]

You can't just take a test _designed_ for evaluating PTSD from the last year and alter it to be for multiple years, the test no longer works. You need to use a _different_ test designed for the situation

[@stephenheffren4324]

But then she wouldn't have been diagnosed with PTSD! Depp deserved his victory.

[@drsylvietourigny5428]

There's a reason certain tests are called "standardised": they are meant to be administered in the same, STANDARD way, each time they are administered, whether among DV victims or burglars or aged care residents. Some of these administrations may well be accompanied by notes bearing a number linking them to the test: the notes do NOT substitute for the standardisation of the test, they supplement it. As to PTSD and level of functioning, one needs to factor in what was "normal" prior to the event: a high functioning individual before the trigger occurence/s, whose PTSD causes 15% loss of function, is still above the average after the trigger. They are unlikely to become babbling idiots.

[@tchew2545]

That’s what i was saying… u can refer to the notes in the testing but u can’t simply omit the notes… even IF she did not do this to alter the results, it can invalidate and it’s just poor practice in general

[@MrArby80]

This lady is damaging her entire profession and calling into question all psychologist used in any trial.

[@samanthaminter8764]

Its aslo terrifying that Amber Heards attorneys, their law firm, has used this Dr. in 50 other cases (I believe that is what she stated the first time she was on the stand) as an expert.

[@UnwantedFoe]

Dr Curry was discussing what tests are good and bad for trials like this, explained why they are good and how the ones that are bad can easily be abused by someone trying for specific results in court. This "doctor" seems desperate despite giving checklists that state the symptoms of ptsd to Amber, then asked Amber to fill out what she feels. For real, how is that NOT a bad idea from a doctor for forensic data???

[@sp00kyd4ddy6]

Could she not just Google the symptoms anyway I don't see why that matters

[@UnwantedFoe]

@@sp00kyd4ddy6 its a matter of what's useful in forensic evidence vs clinical use. In forensic evidence the last thing you want to probably do, is offer a list of the symptoms to a defendant, right before/as they are talking about their claims.

[@UnwantedFoe]

@@sp00kyd4ddy6 think of it like this: You've been studying for your final test in school, then right before you take the test, the teacher hands you the answer sheet THEN says to take the test.

[@pale_saint]

@@sp00kyd4ddy6 Amber Turd could’ve just sent an angry text but she made a grumpy

[@AlfredEiji]

@@sp00kyd4ddy6 There are also priming effects, which are very important for self-report measures.

[@edwinayuso2358]

One thing that I've learned about these so called "experts", is that they are either going to lose their jobs or lose a lot of patients/clients. I'm happy that this trial is televised not only for Johnny but to show how incompetent our justice system is. Furthermore, it'll take other people who a pursuing certain careers more seriously so they end up becoming true professionals and "experts."

[@skagenpige88]

That is not really accurate...in a low cost trial they might win and convict innocent people easily.....if they cant afford a good lawyer themself.

[@PaigeIrene15]

I’m glad someone else is as angry as I am about her testimony. She makes real victims look bad

[@TheBongReyes]

I really have to blame Asmon for me being curious about this case. Never heard of it until he started reacting to it. Now, I find myself being a Johnny Depp fan.

[@charlesrayiii]

Objection narrative

[@kuzmavolkov]

Objection speculation.

[@mrifqi9635]

objection hearsay

[@daphnedevine]

Objection - AGREED@

[@varethedemon]

Objection - Can I approach?

[@raresr79]

imagine a court where a witness is imediately sent to jail for 1 year if found to lie under oath in such a world Amber lawyer would be left with no witness not even Amber would take the stand

[@mistymidnight4447]

To make it more entertaining, a trap door beneath them automatically opens up as soon as they are found lying and they are instantly removed from the court room

[@abbyvaughn3035]

Wayne Dennison: “ummmm You said that we should read the manual…Would you also agree with me that we should read the directions ? Bwahahahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@billymayberry2348]

I noticed Amber smiling and generally enjoying the discomfort of her psychologist. She doesn't care if they're on her team or not, she simply enjoys watching people feeling distressed

[@billymayberry2348]

@@reizak8966 I don't know that it's hate, necessarily. I think she just takes pleasure in other people's misfortune

[@rasberryfields2132]

Exactly! She thrives on chaos!

[@luisaramirez181]

She is just a mean person that enjoys seen people struggling

[@derek.....]

It’s ironic that Amber sat beside a box of Kleenex and never used one but Camille saw right through her tissue of lies and shredded her testimony like confetti 😂👍R.I.P RAY LIOTTA😮

[@chipskyshart87]

Camille was fucking glorious today

[@biglikemadonna]

She only cries when spoken to by her lawyer..

[@chrisw9122]

AH did grab a tissue...but only held it as she wiped her nose with her hand lol never touched her eyes.

[@derek.....]

@@chrisw9122 hiding a quick snort of coke no doubt😂

[@onipaa0074]

WAIT WHAT 😭 R.I.P

[@clayp6415]

Notice how emotional she is getting, voice raising, almost like shes pleading with the jurors to believe her. Dr Curry was calm, collected, and very well spoken the entire time she was on the stand.

[@kizzgizz]

This case has become a pissing contest between experts lol

[@jordyjohn2275]

More like a pros vs. Joes humiliation

[@sorryimsosad]

If you consider Ms. Turds clients as “experts”. I see it more like Amber Heards Herd of Karens

[@Draugo]

I've filled enough of depression tests to know that if you want to mislead the administering psychologist the test gives you clear instructions how. These tests are exactly as efficient as you want meaning that if you actually have a problem you want to fix they help in giving information that helps forming the basis of therapy but if you want to make the situation seem more or less serious as it is then your therapist is completely at your mercy especially if they are predisposed to believe you.

[@dll7658]

exactly. That's why tests with controls are necessary in cases like these where the person is predisposed to present themselves in a way that would be beneficial to them in court. But the fool of course did not

[@coreymccann311]

The thing about the picture that really blows me away, as you can see in both photos, regardless of the colors, that all of her little wisps of hair are exactly the same!! It's literally impossible unless her hair is made of concrete

[@Sneatt]

She's a quack. She was literally called back up to defend herself while saying that everything Dr. Curry said was wrong and she's right. Amber Heard wasn't a client BTW. Even after 20 plus test, and years of talking with her? Ok.

[@MeMelster]

She probably wasn't a client. She was hired by the legal team not amber, she even said that when she was there the first time. That's what the word client means in this context.

[@anteres9821]

One more thing. PTSD ... if she has it .. why has nothing during this trial triggered her since everything being talked about are the reasons she thinks she has it?

[@moonlitskylight5740]

She believes it because Amber told her.

[@kaylay_8026]

Rt all there IS; is her WORD which is calculated lies, and stories she's making up as she goes and gets exposed. Her words shouldn't be and CAN'T BE TRUSTED=DEFAMATION!!!!!

[@Ilovegrunge123]

That's the oddest thing Hughes stated the lawyer saying her story was a hoax triggers her ptsd than why did Amber use that as a counterclaim wouldn't you want to avoid that trigger.

[@voguehaven5154]

it triggered her to LAUGH.

[@the_furry_inside_your_walls639]

Because she doesn't actually have it.

[@gpsywolf]

he took her apart like a pro and i was here for every second of it. Win for humanity right there boi

[@ultikfa8971]

This woman has in no way convinced me that Amber Heard has PTSD. On the contrary. I find Dr. Curry's rebuttal from yesterday to be even more logical now.

[@AngelKyoX]

These type of doctors have this savior complex to the point where it becomes seriously toxic. She's probably seen plenty of women more than men and then took it upon herself ignoring the data that more women are likely to tell people about abuse than men, while men receive more on average , to "save" women more than men. When you spend all this time and money in a career only to end up becoming nothing better than a activist on the street with a sign is just laughably sad. With that said not all doctors are like this woman, just thankfully she getting fucking exposed.

[@MrRavellon]

That happens. However I do not believe that's the case with her. I genuinely believe she's just a bad person and driven by malice more than compassion. She does not care about the women. She just hates men.

[@pale_saint]

I doubt she has seen men in any other view than ”guilty” party

[@notan3144]

Unless I'm missing a stat I don't think you can say outright that men receive more abuse. You can say that men are less likely to report abuse than women because of stigma therefore the numbers are deflated. Also from a utilitarian biological perspective: on average when a woman exerts herself to the same level as a man she's going to do less damage, so the man may perceive that as an issue not worth reporting because he thinks he can handle it regardless of the fact that it's abusive behaviour. Whereas if a man exerts himself to that same level it could seriously hurt the woman leading to hospitalisation and a report being made. Exertion level is a product of intent, so if both are equally exerting themselves then they are equally as abusive psychologically, the physiological outcome is just different.

[@johnstrawb3521]

@@notan3144 Interesting comment, friend. Couple of notes: every NCVS, the largest such survey in the world, shows women are by far the primary instigators of violence in relationships. In addition, of the 12% of couples where only one partner is violent, in 8.4% it is the woman, and in only 3.6% it's the man. And while, unsurprisingly, more women than men are killed due to DV, men are slightly more likely (55 to 45%) to be seriously injured thanks to women's more frequent resort to weapons. As an aside, women's violence is particularly evident and prevalent when their victims are smaller. More prevalent, more injurious, and more deadly. For example, every annual DHHS Child Maltreatment Report ever published shows mothers acting alone are, by far, the primary abusers of children--not to mention how well understood it is that of all the pairings violence is most common by far in les(ian domestic partnerships. For se(ual violence perpetrated by women see feminist icon Hanna Rosin's 2014 article "When Men Are R___... Women Are Often the Perpetrators" and Lara Stemple's supporting research in Scientific American from 2017. (It's too bad yt doesn't allow direct links.) Cheers,

[@RichardHubbuck]

She’s actually contradicted her own testimony - AND she has back-tracked in this testimony. The jury (if they’re worth their salt) are either confused or have realised that she has contradicted herself. Maybe that’s what the defence team wants. However, compare this testimony with what Amber bleated out in her final testimony and it is plain to see that this shrink and Amber’s bollocks don’t add up anyway. PS, she DID use checklists as tests in her original testimony - I know, having undergone the tests and checklists for PTSD myself.

[@dustinrausch5008]

A lawtuber called Emily D. Baker has been streaming the trial, and after the testimonies on this day, spoke with Runkle of the Bailey, who was actually in the courtroom watching the jury (guy in the blue suit with long white hair; at the start of the video, you can see him if you look past Elaine's shoulder). Apparently, the jury didn't seem very convinced by Hughes or by Amber's sob story.

[@mefour83]

Its really interesting to me that every single one of Amber's experts came off as untrustworthy. Putting bias aside, all of them just felt... off

[@lauracookie83]

I literally love this guy. Only found your page from this trial, you are a ledge

[@TheRealVenna]

As someone diagnosed with C-PTSD and went through years of therapy for it, the scale assessments were what I was asked to fill out before each visit, because it provided my therapist with kind of a mood thermometer for the period of time between my visits. It was NOT used as a diagnostic tool, just as an on going mood measurement that allowed her to track my progress over time.

[@brockpha9424]

And everyone knows doctors are never wrong or make mistakes. Good thing there's no such thing as malpractice or getting a second opinion.

[@advertiserunfriendly]

Let's say hypothetically amber heard wanted to go to a different psychologist, the fact is that her new psychologist would ask for copies of these standardized forms for medical history reasons. the fact that she did not properly fill out all fields is really bad and is borderline malpractice. These forms are extremely critical in helping clients for diagnosis and treatment reasons, and should be filled in regardless. She would have saved herself if she even just put in "N/A" or a brief summary or anything, but as we can all clearly see she failed to do her due diligence as a medical professional, and is unironically extremely unprofessional. Her excuse that this form is solely for "research" is absolutely asinine and not true in the slightest.

[@raelsantana8179]

Wow, first when defending what she does, she tells that you need to just follow the manual: 6:34 But when she need to fill up standard tests she doesn't, she writes her aswers in other pages away from the stardard... Her notes are more important than standards.

[@209Diskence]

I have serious doubts about all Psychologists in this country after seeing her. The board of Psychology should do something about this...