This is the clearest explanation I’ve seen on this topic and topics related to Fourier optics. Awesome job! I’d be interested to see which references you used.
@JordanEdmundsEECS4 жыл бұрын
Primarily Goodman’s textbook, I think his is pretty much the only one.
@zainkarriem63444 жыл бұрын
@@JordanEdmundsEECS You mean "Introduction to Fourier Optics"? I didn't know about this title till now. Will check it out. Oh, I also liked your description of diffraction as the evolution of the wave. I've spoken to many people about diffraction and I found that it means different things to different people, but the evolution concept seems to unify different views for me. Thanks!
@CyberHo4X11 ай бұрын
Can you tell me which grating equtation is the right and why? Ive seen the one d = m*lambda / sin(i)+sin(o) and ive also seen d = m*lambda / sin(i)-sin(o) Which is right and what is the generel sign convention? Thank you
@haya48954 жыл бұрын
this is very helpful, thanx alot. will you do double slit FD?
@CohenSu Жыл бұрын
double slit FD is quite the same as single slit but with two rect function located at different location
@จงบบ-ฝ8ค4 жыл бұрын
Very good video!!!
@sagibruck67885 ай бұрын
there is a problem the expponent inside is exp(-0.5*jk/d(x_s-x)^2)-you took the x_s and took it out'you should multiply in 0.5 but tjats not my problem'my problem is that exp(-0.5jk/d*(-2x_s*x) is exp(jk*x_s*x/d) for foriour transform you need a minous in the exponent, your lesson is good but i just dont understand till the end
@DavidTrejoG4 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks for this :)
@maymyatlwin1266 Жыл бұрын
I cannot see anything in this video.There is just sound.
@rava4773 жыл бұрын
guys is fraunhofer diffraction called fraunhofer lines?
@JordanEdmundsEECS2 жыл бұрын
Nope, Fraunhofer lines have to do with absorption of light be the atmosphere, not diffraction. Unfortunate overlap in the name xD