Judge blasts county attorney over due process!!!

OG channel • Judge Grills County La...

[@johnbednarcik9359]

sounds just like the red flag laws someone makes a "claim" They go to court behind your back and then you lose your weapons without even having a chance to defend yourself in court.

[@tyrelldiggz]

exactly. Trying to circumvent the law. Disgusting. So sick of seeing government overreach.

[@marvinkline5667]

Have to ask yourself who backs red flag laws and the TAPS act(a federal red flag law) and vote them out..."shall not be infringed".

[@johnbednarcik9359]

a 2nd committee is "appointed" by the 1st committee to investigate the 1st, HOLY SHIITE, what could go wrong with that? Like asking the biggest bully in school to set up a group to investigate the bullies in the school and he gets to pick the people he wants to investigate the claims.

[@georgecraytin9838]

Or having the police investigate themselves. What could go wrong

[@billtate6962]

Any attorney that can't tell from the Judge's line of questioning....where this is going....is completely up her own rear end....with no self awareness at all....or I guess that describes most attorneys for the "state".

[@birdman7135]

She's arguing, *_"That's the way it is, and the system set in place works."_* That is her position. To her, it doesn't matter about the judge's line of questioning or how he "feels" about it; she's sticking with the facts as they are. ... You can't expect he to change her battle strategy mid-hearing just because she's run into some opposition.

[@dsabre4990]

No right to appeal? The county gets to set up a commission that denies citizens their 14th amendment rights in regard to a government entity? Utter nonsense.

[@MDNQ-ud1ty]

No right to appeal but they have the right to abuse you. Do you understand how insane they are? They just want to be your master.

[@walter6574]

Welcome to America. Have you heard of Project 2025? Good bye government oversight. Look it up; it's scary. The democrats will be out of control.

[@jackael666]

They get around it by setting up administrative commission which is non judicial which can skirt the 14th.

[@dsabre4990]

@@jackael666 Yeah, and this judge seems onto this scam

[@russahlquist5691]

The Ethical Commission being unethical? Sounds like a conundrum. Due process must be unethical per the ethics commission.

[@decur8]

Like the police. We investigated ourselves and found no wrong doing. No appeal.

[@Goodluck27711]

💯

[@whatilearnttoday5295]

It's by design. This is the nature of centralised power.

[@MrBillchair]

G'Day Captain Awesome, from Sydney Australia 🇦🇺 🦘👍

[@disconbobulated3514]

I hope you know your work is appreciated

[@russahlquist5691]

Of course the "Ethics" Commission here is so ethical that no one ought to be able to question their judgement or authority, per them. That sounds so very unethical.

[@mistsemy1522]

Sound more like a dictator commission😊

[@DacDac-w7r]

An appeal is a part of due process.

[@mikechrz288]

Much respect to this judge

[@DiscGolfFool]

The defense attorney is really enjoying her digging her hole. He keeps leaning in and grinning 😂

[@BrooklynBalla]

I don’t answer “qweestions” 🤣 That’s intro always cracks me up

[@DebHawpetoss]

A majority of these county attys are the ones with the lowest grades and don't know what the hell there job is according to the law...

[@christopheraaron8299]

That county attorney had a very condescending tone. I don't think it's wise to use that kind of a tone when speaking to a judge.

[@anonymous-tn6ij]

That’s funny and ethics violation would be grounds for appeal and they’re denying his appeal which is an ethics violation so the snake is eating its own tail

[@mule1995]

She is double-talking her triple talk while riding a quad runner and juggling explosives.

[@decur8]

Dang I listen patiently to the whole argument but failed to hear the whole decision. Why did you cut it off at the end but not at the beginning?

[@RogueNationAudits]

I got all there was to get. Go to the link in the description and read his video description for end result.

[@SG-ys4tk]

If it was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, it was filed with the clerk of the wrong court. Was the petition filed according to the Administrative Procedure Act of the state where this occurred? I see each state should have their own version of the act. My assumption is that this would go before an Offfice of Administrative Hearings or similar since these are administrative officers. *Correction: I listened again and realized the dismissal was due to the attorney’s assertion that the APA didn’t apply in this case. I haven’t read the APA to see why, but I suppose the plaintiff can appeal this dismissal if they still don’t agree. It wasn’t an issue of filing with the wrong court. I get that people in power do dirt, but a lot of the time we don’t get the results we’re looking for because we don’t follow proper procedure and they can’t tell us what the proper procedure is because that constitutes giving legal advice. READ CAREFULLY. I’m not saying this person didn’t follow procedure since I don’t have all of the facts, but I get annoyed when people automatically respond with “the system is corrupt” and give up without considering the possibility that they did something wrong. That type of sentiment is prevalent in the comments of videos like these. The system is the way it is mostly because the People are the way they are. Be the change you want to see in the world!

[@dogblooded]

Whoever made up these procedures are crazy. Everything in government should have a board of citizens for complaints they meet twice a month go over complaints and next one is appeal if needed

[@sam-v7x3g]

Govt. Attorney will do whatever it takes to make Govt. win with no accountability!!

[@sassyQueen-cr5dq]

So this female attorney believes this man did not file a certain piece of legal dispute against her actions.So he is not worthy of his rights to appeal etc according to her or should I say due to his own ignorance. So therefore he is not worthy of due process.😢

[@16MedicRN]

Rogue, I'm not gonna lie, we need more positive videos. Wait, didn't we just see this???

[@thecolonel-truesoutherngen2230]

good evening Major!

[@FoxtrotOscarAudits]

Taken at face value, her argument serves to render the ethics commission as nothing more than a "complaints dept" box where people can file their grievances but not really have any expectation of any just outcome. Try another example, counselor... "Mr. X, thank you for coming today. We have heard your complaint. Have a nice day." "Aren't you going to rule on it?" "Oh, no. We've decided that's not our role. We're just here so that we can say you had the opportunity to complain. Now that you have complained, the process is complete, and there's nothing you can do about it. We are the first, last, and only step in the process." That's her argument. The commission is omnipotent and not subject to oversight. Sounds like a typical governmental position.

[@patrickday4206]

The federal government did that once and got spanked for frustration of process

[@tonysandquist4492]

Very good

[@ctg18158]

It's Washington state. That was stated many times.

[@thomasautonomousanonymous2050]

It could be Washington state

[@smickjeff1]

Washington State flag behind the judge.

[@jameschupp2230]

What is Not even brought up yet is that The Constitution Is THE LAW, By Which ALL COLOR OF LAW (statute, ordinance, regulation, Code or custom) Can Be Ratified (Established). There is ALWAYS IS TO BE DUE PROCESS!!! All statute, ordinance, regulation, Code or custom, (Must Not Deny) deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States... But If They Do Violate Any Person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696 ; Pub. L. 90-284, title I, § 103(b) , Apr. 11, 1968 , 82 Stat. 75 ; Pub. L. 100-690, titleVII, § 7019 , Nov. 18, 1988 , 102 Stat. 4396 ; Pub. L. 103-322, title VI, § 60006(b) , title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b),title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994 , 108 Stat. 1970 , 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104-294, title VI , §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996 , 110 Stat. 3507 , 3511.)

[@johnjames4567]

this is a good example of Administrative law in action where the government agency makes laws without Legislative authority, adjudicates agency law without Judicial authority, and enforces agency law without Executive authority all in violation of the "separation of powers"....

[@patrickday4206]

I'm in Washington setting up an agency that cannot be appealed to court would be a due process violation as it could set you up to loose in court because they wrongful ruled against you and then used it against you in court when you sued yet you cannot have it ruled incorrect.

[@patrickday4206]

Washington has 4 branches of government we have an erected administrative branch in most areas the governors do appoint some but we didn't want corruption so we vote in most positions even the clerk of the court

[@eddiereichel9354]

After not allowing public comment at a "public input committee" meeting the county attorney Greg Merkel said the irony was not lost on him and he suggested they change the name of the committee. Oil City PA. This was printed front page on our local newspaper

[@scottrmc59]

A Politician went meet with a lobbyists. The lobbyists ask the politician what your ethics are, and before they can finish the politician's reply, Personal, Business or Political!

[@scottinflorida1030]

All that 💰 she spent on law school wasted 🤔😆🤣🤪 thanks for sharing Major 👍🇺🇸📸🗽⚖️

[@anonymous-tn6ij]

Speaking of ethics, I thought we were all free Americans and any law enforcement or any government worker has swore an oath to the constitution. I’m not sure why these people are trying so hard to take away the freedoms of an American when they swore to uphold such freedoms, any patriot who sworn us to the Constitution would be disgusted and would try everything not to take away the freedoms of an American While still doing their duty if you have to you have to it’s just like when you watch a game and there’s some referees that pick it everything to make the team lose and there are other referees that overlook stuff but we are all on the same team there’s no reason to try to go out of your way to put someone in jeopardyso what is the motivation? Oh yeah, it’s money. You in trouble equals money and there’s the bias.

[@samuelstoner5651]

I am impressed by the intelligence of both the judge and the attorney, to be able to argue back and forth as they did. Most of it was certainly way over my head.

[@greenmirror5555]

Born and raised on the foundation that life does not start at conception! Honest trade makes friendship! Article 1 Section 10

[@dennisbailey6067]

Think the judge is giving the hint,but the atty isnt picking up on it.🤯D.u.m.b.

[@wtc7665]

your videos used to be so good you have fallen victim like all the other suditors that wne to court and now ralize the system is rigged

[@buzz3964]

❤😂🫡🇺🇸

[@LadyJ-ot3tz]

Southwest Washington State..

[@louiegarcia6703]

Hey rogue Michigan here 👋✌️👍

[@cluelessbeekeeping1322]

I missed the 'blasting' portion.

[@twiztid6977420]

Alex Jones was unable to appeal

[@stevenmccormack2014]

If I'm not mistaken Clark county is in Nevada.

[@daksta50]

Or is it in WI, CA or OR or some other state?

[@caniacstevehenderson7115]

Boom !! 😮

[@cypeman8037]

she's a bit nasal.

[@cajunrandy2143]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@rustysdirtworks8398]

Its scary these women go to college, and suddenly they are smarter than a sitting judge, this attitude that they are smarter than everyone because they have a degree is a joke

[@tomshaw661]

R.N. yeeeea'

[@WitnessingTyranny]

Clark County Washington

[@pyneryder]

Yes, covers the city of Vancouver, Washington. Just across the river from the lovely Portland, Oregon.

[@terrivangundy]

❤❤❤

[@SG-ys4tk]

To be clear, due process means following the rules that have been created for a given procedure. If there is no appeal procedure written in the rules, you can’t appeal. If there is a need for an appeal procedure, a request should be made to the governing body according to its procedures to do so. The governing body could be the legislature or an Administrative Committee. In this case there is no appeal process, but the petitioner filed a petition for administrative review because the person(s) that handled his complaints used a stricter review process from what administrative policy called for. They probably have a good chance of getting the complaints looked at again if they get this in the right court.

[@user-sl4ul4nc3t]

Thats not how due process works. In that case a city could empower its police to be police, prosecutor, andnjudge likemjudge dredd and according to you thays the process.

[@SG-ys4tk]

@@user-sl4ul4nc3t How does what you said relate to what I said? In other words, I said due process means you follow the rules as written. If a rule is not written, there is no rule that must be followed. You can’t say not allowing an appeal is a due process violation if there is no appeal process in the rules.

[@patrickday4206]

Due process is substantive not simply in form having a hearing doesn't meet due process rights it's about whether or not it was fair. If it's not just it's not law. Saint Augustine

[@handicapnews1033]

[@BIGJ03SGPHS]

Who cares