Julia lang is (mostly) getting quicker

[@JulianChastain]

The plot you showed at the end of the video was cut off by your camera. We couldn't see what the results were for the 1.11.0 run

[@oterotube13]

it is a shame.. the most important is the hidden one!, at least we know where the boxplot is in the figure.

[@ekbphd3200]

Yeah, I noticed that after I finishing the video. I gotta check that type of thing before publishing future videos.

[@ekbphd3200]

Yeah. Darn. I need to check that in future videos.

[@rauldurand]

you may want to upload the video again after fixing it

[@valdarbien3252]

It's about 83 sec., you might notice if you stop the video just before full size.

[@MarcoAntoniotti]

You should not do scripts in Julia. (or anything else). You pay the compilation time at each run.

[@ekbphd3200]

Good point. I guess in the end, I care about how much I have to wait for results once I run the script, so the compilation time is important to me too.

[@MarcoAntoniotti]

@@ekbphd3200 the issue is that you are not measuring things properly. You should have a one line script that calls a function both in Python and Julia. That way you should notice the difference.

[@chrisrackauckasofficial]

@@ekbphd3200 If you put it in a package then it would build and cache the binary, so that would only be ran once during the package precompilation time.