Just How Powerful is LRASM Anti-ship Missile

LRASM is a long range, precision-guided anti-ship missile leveraging off of the successful JASSM-ER heritage, and is designed to meet the needs of U.S. Navy and Air Force warfighters. Armed with a penetrator and blast fragmentation warhead, LRASM employs precision routing and guidance, day or night in all weather conditions. The missile employs a multi-modal sensor suite, weapon data link, and enhanced digital anti-jam Global Positioning System to detect and destroy specific targets within a group of numerous ships at sea.
Other videos you might like:
The Biggest Aircraft Carriers ► • The World's Biggest Ai...
No One Wants to Fight the A-10 Warthog ► • Why No One Wants to Fi...
Javelin Anti-Tank Missile ► • How Powerful is Javeli...
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO US ► kzbin.info...
Thank You.

[@wattlebough]

Australia has just purchased 200 LRASMs for the Royal Australian Air Force for it’s Super Hornets and F35As. Thanks USA. We might need them to defend against an ever growing Chinese PLA-Navy threat in our region.

[@fromthe508brocktonma9]

Um... if your country goes to conflict we go too. You don’t have to worry about nothing

[@wattlebough]

@CR We appreciate that. Technically you guys are already here, we’ve got about 2,000 US Marines permanently stationed near Darwin in the Northern Territory and a small detachment of USAF F22s at RAAF Base Tindal only a few hundred kilometres south of the Marine RF-D.

[@wattlebough]

@Drew Peacock The Long Range Anti Ship Missile, aka LRASM, doesn’t lack range. It can launch over 500km from the target. The LRASM also has stealth characteristics of its own for external carry, and an ECM suit to defeat enemy CIWS.

[@wattlebough]

@Drew Peacock The range of the LRASM is >500km and it’s stealth characteristics, ECM and EW suit will defeat enemy CIWS and aircraft interception.

[@wattlebough]

@Drew Peacock The US and Australia are also developing hypersonic long range anti-ship ballistic missiles. All your concerns are about to go away.

[@killawatt8243]

It has an onboard algorithm that coordinates a combined attack when multiple units are launched for maximum efficiency in eliminating counter defenses ... that is some next level stuff

[@kokomo9764]

It's warhead is to small.

[@KKSuited]

@@kokomo9764 which? The LRASM?

[@dundonrl]

@@maeton-gaming Easy.. shoot down all the incoming missiles, no more threat.

[@lightningxx]

So does the Russian P800. In fact, one of them will assume a high altitude position as a decoy and to collect targeting info to send back to its sea skimming brothers

[@Bradlalb123]

@@dundonrl yea. Easy, just shoot them all. Genius

[@crystalclear7799]

Can you name it ORG-ASM, stand for Orbital Range Guided-Anti Ship Missile

[@joemckibbin2062]

Wahyudi stolen from a comment on Lockheed martins vid ?

[@crystalclear7799]

@@joemckibbin2062 nope.

[@Ruminations1from2Connecticut]

Too funny

[@jeffreyharrison3731]

A JISM is a Joint Intermediate Ship Missile.

[@paulbaker9277]

Give it 6 revertible speeds and guaranteed to come once switched on .

[@richystar2001]

The Navy is now working on a amphibious stealth missile that will land in water 500meters from the target...then act like a torpedo to impact ship below the water line.

[@hoangvuification]

ooo that is deadly. What is it name?

[@-NOCAP-]

@@hoangvuification I just tried finding it but I can't. The only Naval shot missile that dives into the water is the Russian RBU 6000 that is shot from rocket pods and stays travels in the sky as a missile until it reaches a target. I'm not saying we don't have somrthing similar, I'm just having trouble finding a youtube video on it submarine which is when it dives and engages the submarine.

[@gogrape9716]

Sounds good.

[@TOBI-UZUMAKI]

india has a rocket system that can carry a torpedo or two to deliver it to the target its called the S.M.A.R.T system. Launched from land or sea and its used to kill subs at any distance once its detected . it is state of the art sub killer🔥

[@3mtech]

@@-NOCAP- ASROC(VLA)?

[@Bluelightbandit]

07:49 Those protective covers are sick! 🦇

[@bryandepaepe5984]

If used in a coordinated timed attack, with Harpoons for lower value targets, it could easily overwhelm air defense systems of the opposing forces.

[@dustyroads834]

Unfortunately our enemies have that exact same strategy

[@MO-lc7vb]

Dusty Roads yes but we have superior close defense nets

[@BC-sr3gg]

but how can we defend waves of mid range ballistic missiles?

[@brianjordan2192]

@@BC-sr3gg SM-6 is specifically designed to take out ballistic missles. The hysteria about ballistic anti-ship misses is unwarranted. In the first place Chinese tech is very overrated, it often fails miserably. These missles have never been tested in a ecm environment, nor against moving targets. Secondly America has had ABM technology for many years now.

[@Frost-01]

fun fact about ballistic missiles is accuracy, if you want your ballistic missile to hit a target thats moving at a constant rate, you need to have the missile's trajectory updated down to the last minute, that means having constant surveillance and tracking on said target if you want to even hit it with a ballistic missile, cuz once the missile enter's its final stage where only the warhead remains, by the time its own sensor locks in, the amount of time it has to course correct is so little that if the ship just moves a few meters away its gonna miss. Unlike cruise missiles where they are far more maneuverable and thus can have better course correction ability and can acquire their target much more earlier due to not being obstructed by the atmosphere and clouds. So unless said opposing country has that capability of providing that up to date guidance which it might or might not, hitting a ship out in the ocean with a ballistic missile is like trying to trying to thread a needle but your very very far away from the needle while trying to thread it.

[@alabamacoastie6924]

You guys do the best military news videos. Thanks.

[@Chuck_Hooks]

B-1s will carry a nice mix of LRASMs and AGM-183A mach 20 missiles. Btw, more than 100 P-8s can carry a similar mix.

[@afwaller]

A B Mach 20 at ground level is around 23,000 km/h. The international space station moves at around 28,000 km/h - so for various definitions of a “missile” that include the ISS in their scope, yes, there are missiles that go significantly faster than Mach 20.

[@DarkMatterX1]

@Pee Poo Poo Pee Except for the AGM-183A.

[@josephpacchetti5997]

Impressive Missile, Thanks Sam. 👍 🇺🇸

[@user-xp2vo7cv9i]

0:38 explosion of a german destroyer from the movie "U-571"

[@shawnbaker5909]

Very impressive anti-ship missile

[@DeltadronesBr]

Awesome!

[@tteot1wph]

"simultaneous swarming attack" + "only 23 on order" = ineffective

[@strategicperson95]

Anyone else find it odd to hear some of this weapons flight path to the target and how using multiple of them to try and over-saturate the enemies defensive fire sounds eerily similar to how Kamikaze attacks worked in WW2? I'm thinking it should get the unofficial name of Kamikaze or Ohka just for the lols.

[@pabis6817]

Minus the sacrificing human guidance packages for the emperor part.

[@ree5158]

that's pretty much how all anti ship weapons work you just send as many as you can at as far as you can and try and get a few missiles past enemy air defense.

[@patrickbrady519]

Why even put our ships in harms way. Load up a galaxy c5 it can hold 45 of em In sliding crates ,sit 1000 miles out with q couple of other c5 loaded up circle em, and release them , saturation complete all targets were taken out none of us got hit .now send in the navy and mop up any survivor's or just leave em for the sharks. DONE. EASY. 😮

[@HunterDFtwo]

“Respect its privacy” lol

[@steveshoemaker6347]

Many thanks...!

[@jakebond2294]

Wouldn't it be nice if we could all just get along.

[@polygorg]

The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

[@blakeh6250]

WTF is your babbling achieved..got way to much time on your hands.

[@polygorg]

@@blakeh6250 ?

[@rickstellfox9738]

Kobayashi Maru quandary

[@kenpachizaraki3531]

Lockheed Martin 🔥🔥

[@fromthe508brocktonma9]

ian cotcher no... I think you mean darpa

[@killawatt8243]

They have some good ideas lol

[@fromthe508brocktonma9]

Hoo Lee Sheet shhh do we have any secret missiles?

[@fromthe508brocktonma9]

Hoo Lee Sheet man I still think they did production on the TASSM stealth cruise missile and we don’t know.

[@abj9121]

Lockhear martin is better stick to air fighters manufacturing because in weapons it overwhelmingly sucks... Russia has hypersonic missile/rockets that fly over 20.000 MPH whit stealth technology and nuclear propulsion. It is only a matter of the software codes which type of weapon is going to be. The missile fly at speeds over 20.000 MPH low altitude and capable to detect radars. The problem is that detonations of nuclear missiles at hypersonic speeds the heavy metal and radioactive metals load already have the kinetic energy force of a nuclear explosion changing the explosions behaviour tremendously. This effect causes the nuclear fusionvortex which is observed as a wal of fire from the ground up to the sky and a normal 7.5 megaton nuke has a devastating radius of 2250 miles, at hypersonic speed it will be a wall of super heated gasious heavy metals. The area length of destruction for these nukes is up to 45.000 miles and all targets withing this area are being vaporized. All the metals present in its path have no time to melt or boil so they all explode into auper heated gasious metals feeding the nuclear fusion vortex.

[@adammaximus9957]

It's interesting that Russia is opting for speed, and America is opting for stealth.

[@adammaximus9957]

@Norm Wagoner lololol

[@victorwilson6826]

The Enemy: Thanks for showing us in detail how your technology works.

[@Marko24031993]

Who is the Enemy?

[@stephenroys9453]

Hell yeah!!! Don't mess with US!

[@georgewashington938]

I heard of a project to develop a missile intended for select members of the adversary - it is called the JISSIM guided missile

[@TheHk1966]

Look out when it blows its load..

[@timf6916]

Yes

[@rowmagnvs]

Nobody appreciating the birds eye view of the missile launch (beginning of video). That is some amazing camera+drone work!

[@reubeng2110]

That little bit was pretty good cgi I'll give you that but that's all it was

[@buffwarriors]

lol it was animated CGI and not even a good one

[@wingng1007]

Good job!👍

[@seagie382]

the missile knows where it is

[@JoeyBlogs007]

I was thinking about a flapless design, by using manoeuvrable weights inside the missile's structure. Possibly also useful for a hypersonic missile design.

[@JeffBourke]

I had a massive LRASM just watching this....

[@scottlowe5590]

I hate when that happens.

[@musicguy20]

Such a shame that it has to be destroyed to hit its target 🥺 all the capabilities it has then boom 💥 dust lol

[@jeffreyharrison3731]

Just like a fancy meal. Hours of love and then devoured in an instant.

[@terryfreeman1018]

Oh man. Now I'm depressed. Booom all gone. 😡

[@TheKeithvidz]

that's where the profit is milked.

[@GTOGregory]

Amazing capabilities!

[@budo4]

So basically an autonomous smart drone with a bomb inside. I sometimes wonder if these things will replace fighter jets - small, fast, smart, cheaper and plentiful

[@patrickbrady519]

Cheaper dunno man we already have a couple of200million dollar drone deployed out there so we lost that whole idea of cheaper years ago

[@snipe1995]

TARGET ACQUIRED !

[@jeromedamian5740]

America needs to make thousands and thousands of those weapons. If they are that effective.

[@TheBongReyes]

If I’m not wrong, the new Constellation-class frigates will have the Mk41 VLS cells. So, they’ll be able to carry LRASM if needed.

[@blank_white_paper_revolution]

They are gonna steal it!

[@briananthony4044]

I wonder how an afterburner would go that activates in the terminal stage to boost flight speed in the last few kilometres

[@SW-tj7rp]

Curious to see If we have tested these armaments against our own technology. Such as, can WE defeat this missile? Im sure the answer is known. Just curious.

[@passivehouseaustralia4406]

is this the same as NSM ? Naval Strike Missile ? if so the Aussies ordered some specials with seekers to find active radars.

[@keithbernard6597]

That's cool

[@karmashift248]

Very good~ 😄😄😄

[@jamalbabagol7074]

USA 👍

[@ragingbull8024]

Hope US will commercialized these in their allied countries!

[@juliakato2199]

Great build many and depot asap because Uncle now has targets to go after too !! Let's get cracking ,on hulls that is.

[@dadoody]

9:30 they need to scrape off that rust and paint over it with an enamel paint with anti-rust chemicals in it, like tanic acid. Rust Reformer is one type.

[@tompalmer5986]

Would it be possible to put an engine in the back of the LRASM that would kick in and make this missile much faster just before it goes into the S shaped maneuver before it hits a ship?

[@ronaldharris6569]

Just load explosives on a retired predator drone put in a self guidance and let them travel 400 miles to the target at 5 feet off the water or terrain during the self guiding final 2miles and instant anti ship missile using off the shelf equipment

[@josephastier7421]

It will be seen and plinked as soon as it comes into gun range.

[@Michaelyinglia]

3:37 Wait what? How did this big slow missile evade the close-in weapon system?

[@Stephen-bq4nq]

@Drew Peacock They won't even tell us everything the missile has going for it

[@fernandoamy8278]

@@Stephen-bq4nq You're correct. This missile has EW countermeasures as is stated in the video.

[@3mtech]

Low and slow radar dont know

[@wolfgangamadeusmozart4569]

China: Ctrl+Alt+C

[@c0c0nutbeans]

it's ctrl+c and ctrl+v

[@jeffreyharrison3731]

DF-17. Not sure they need us for ship to ship. They can take out a carrier group with their new hypersonic. A2/AC

[@qiyuxuan9437]

@@jeffreyharrison3731 Also YJ18, it has around the same range as LRASM, with similar functions during cruise stage(sub sonic sea skim) However, it can accelerate to mach3 during the final 50km range, which is a lot faster.

[@Thomas-fz9xw]

@@qiyuxuan9437 That also makes it a lot easier to detect, and current anti-missile defenses can go just as fast. It's why hypersonics are being built, and why the LRASM is subsonic, as It's designed for a "stealth" approach

[@qiyuxuan9437]

@@Thomas-fz9xw not really, it also fly just as low as LRASM, only a few meter above sea level.

[@charlesduke6247]

The missile also needs total stealth where once it’s launched it automatically homes in on its target with deadly pin point precision and needs to be jam prove

[@martinjohnson2381]

Yes, and throw in a quantum reality phase shift generator, so it can bypass physical barriers and hit vulnerable targets. And a beer cooler.

[@TOBI-UZUMAKI]

Actually it has both

[@BlunderMunchkin]

Your intro sequence has Earth spinning in the wrong direction.

[@mybut9722]

Best

[@loggins2182001]

The enemy is currently developing "CREAMPIES" Combat Ready EMP Armed Missile Protection, Interception, & Evasion System.

[@extraordinarytv5451]

nice

[@earthhouseentertainment4024]

Thank you 🌹💯

[@kickofftheboot]

What happens if the enemy catches on and turns off their radar?

[@drbelli]

good question!?!

[@danielsnook7362]

Please continue to upgrade the LRASM instead of the tomahawks or the harpoons I think the LRASM is worth it especially the longer range version I hope they don't make the war head smaller just make it longer for more fuel and make it more hack resistance granted doing it that way might mean we have to make the missile silos on the ship's bigger but hey I think the next-gen destroyers and frigates should have bigger missile silos anyways

[@danielsnook7362]

@Drew Peacock either that or make destroyers have hypersonic boost Glide missiles after all the zumwalt-class has bigger missile silos already so if we could fit one of the Prototype missiles into those silos along with that stealthy design but what I would change on the Zumwalt class is maybe give it the better radar system they made then replace its artillery cannons in the front with a missile silos for defensive Rockets and a laser defense system

[@danielsnook7362]

@Drew Peacock interesting feedback noted but what I suggested is still just a temporary solution my idea may have flaws but that's just my honest opinion so thanks for not calling me retarded or anything like that I know other viewers would have a hernia from my suggestion and Zumwalt class Destroyers with hypersonic boost Glide missiles and Laser defense systems would be a good start but what you're suggesting to modify the tomahawk with will be a good idea to in fact if I were to design a block 6 variant I'll keep the range incorporate your ideas try to and make it super sea skim like the LRASM but then again I think we should design a whole new class of destroyer from the ground up that incorporates these things we've been talkin about

[@danielsnook7362]

@Drew Peacock oh and by the way the new radar system is called AN/spy-6

[@danielsnook7362]

@Drew Peacock I was thinking anti-submarine missiles and missiles that could attack low-flying Jets and helicopters along with hypersonics and I'm not saying it is going to be on the zumwalt-class that's just my recommendation everything I have been mentioning is but I'd be much like to hear what you think would be a good stopgap solution until we could afford to make a whole new class of destroyer from the ground up in and my bad I thought that the radar I mentioned was the newest thing we had but if you want to know some missiles i had in mind I was thinking the sm6 but I think we can do better than that

[@tomhanks7873]

that’s an advanced kamikazi. Japan would be proud

[@temakillamusic8652]

Wow

[@tieck4408]

Everyone likes the concept of supersonic anti ship missiles, but your own position is given away upon launch, long before it arrives to disable the enemy, and CIWS systems can also engage supersonic projectiles. Sneaking is good alternative.

[@skk3940]

How many mph does this cruise at?

[@geoben1810]

I think we need to get laser / rail gun weapons on line ASAP, or sooner. 👍🏻😉

[@dons8122]

Those are as big as a ship and are still limited to line of sight.

[@kanishkdhanker0280]

USA really need a Hypersonic Anti Ship with a range 1000 Miles,Have same sensors like LRASM and its relatively cheap to produce.

[@garwhittaker3743]

Speed is not everything.

[@kanishkdhanker0280]

@@garwhittaker3743 SPEED is necessary it will give very less reaction to the enemy.

[@DavyRo]

You mean like one of those Russian ones

[@blakeh6250]

@@kanishkdhanker0280 but not as maneuverable in terminal phase at high speeds against moving targets

[@jolmeaki]

A stealth missile? Scary AF just thinking about it.

[@covidhoax7646]

It’s not stealth in the infrared range.

[@neekniggit3606]

The next variation will be the OHRASM. Over Horizon Ranged Anti-Ship Missile will be long and Hard (to track) and the enemy will never see it coming. Hey what can I say it's the U.S. Navy. They love that stuff.

[@nickybritain4900]

Yes, but are these missiles safe? It looks like these could kill people.

[@ioanbota9397]

They are powerful

[@youraveragebinchicken6807]

They should bring back 16in cannons.

[@scrmepal]

The Americans really needed the LRASM as the Harpoon is now pretty much ineffective, compared to anti-ship missiles from most other nations!

[@CJ3000]

Military Industrial Complex... is very real.

[@Toothache1988]

Can you imagine the underwater version of this? I can.

[@Toothache1988]

@Roger Wilco well Im a betting man so I am willing to say at least 100 nautical miles. Maybe more dependent on what they were to use as a fuel cell.

[@Toothache1988]

@Roger Wilco I suppose it would depend on your target but artificial inteligence pared with an observer can do some serious damage. I wont pretend to know much either. But I do imagine that autonomous subs are a thing of the future. Recently in war drills the newest of our carriers was sunk technically by a diesel sub. I just think that a big giant ship like a super carrier would be large enough to churn up enough water for something like a undersea version of the LRASM to be able to locate.

[@jeffreyharrison3731]

Super cavitation is a Russian/Ukrainian specialty. Not sure if the US is pursuing this high speed torpedo with enough enthusiasm.

[@MrFlatage]

@@jeffreyharrison3731 Nah your Ruski torpedo goes maybe 230 mph? Yea that isn't going to stop our 500+ mph torpedo? lol!

[@shielahaberecht3417]

2nd! But Im cuter, and I love big, powerfully thrusting American missiles!!

[@weedme4932]

🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

[@shielahaberecht3417]

@@weedme4932 Now that's more like it.. strength in numbers :))))

[@juanlu3958]

.............

[@larrymccarthy3068]

the wordplay in your comment and reply is nothing short of amazing comedy lol

[@rite2beararms]

😘

[@thephilosopherofculture4559]

The question is, is sea warfare, or warfare at all, still possible in this day and age. The world has become very small. In villages people don't fight with one another either , even if they do not agree at all or hate each other.

[@honshinglai6325]

If anti-missiles can intercept 20% of attacking missiles, it will be an outstanding result, but they can't!

[@50buttfish]

It's SO powerful, it will blow the crap out of your fishing boat, and not even leave CHUM for the fishies.

[@environmentalremedialtesti5234]

USA 🇺🇸 strong 💪

[@jeffreyharrison3731]

meh

[@kelly916]

Ones that you don’t hear off would be far more frightening 😂

[@all9alley254]

it,s no 1 hypersonic missle eagle wepons

[@1969darr]

ASMs rarely ever sink a ship. Only way to reliably sink a ship is to break its back, either from above or underneath. Side shots above the waterline may disable if it hits a critical system like the bridge or ignites a ammo bunker etc.

[@andrewjackson5127]

Moskva sunk by ASM.

[@GBY13]

Japanese Air Force: Hit the enemy ship by our planes! US Navy: OMG! They are nuts! 80 years later... US Navy:

[@rickfox4068]

I cannot believe the Chief Boatswain let that rust there in front of the camera. When I was in the Navy, this would have been corrected already!

[@blakeh6250]

Not the navy we were in..but retired in 08

[@Mr.Deleterious]

It's equal to or greater than the Anti-Ship name it bears. So it must at least anti ships, right? 😁

[@shatner99]

This is how we beat the Tic Tacs-they had trouble when two or more LRASMs coordinated on a single target, in an extremely short period of time (3-5 seconds) before impact. After the short war with the tacs, Trump renamed Tic Tac with LRASMint, paying great homage to the missile that saved the world. You know what you have to do.

[@wingman4668]

You mean tic tax ufos? Dam

[@2012truth1776]

Hmm painted like a plane, maybe that put the 14 ft, diameter hole in the pentagon, before the wall collapsed. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@apuffofpink8484]

Weird, the military naming an acronym after the name of the thing

[@mylifeisamememylifeispathe3140]

Jasm is a beauty I spam them like crazy in my game 😎

[@garwhittaker3743]

Would love to see this win the Royal navy's new Anti ship missile , can it be fired from the F-35B ?? Why don't anti ship missiles have a rotating band in the middle that fires flares and decoys for when it comes under attack ?

[@garwhittaker3743]

@Event Horizons Or so it will always hit it's target is that what you are saying ?

[@garwhittaker3743]

@Event Horizons And they can only peck the lobes for so long without being seen .

[@DavyRo]

They can't beat our one or the Russian one but they're obsessed about fantasy Chinese copies thinking China wants to copy their inferior missiles.

[@garwhittaker3743]

@Drew Peacock It wouldn't need to carry them internally. ..LRASM has very long legs .

[@garwhittaker3743]

@Drew Peacock F-35 could fly out say 400miles LRASM -300miles ...700miles is good no ?

[@AmericanIdiot7659]

Lmao I love spamming this in a game that allows you to put 35 of these in a B-1 with external

[@RhysC0681]

What game?

[@ai_is_great]

Lol what game lmao

[@mylifeisamememylifeispathe3140]

Yes dude lol

[@lancethomson3616]

What game

[@mrbrianbrush]

What game? Command modern operations probaly

[@suzannegoncalves9934]

👍

[@gytiskondratas467]

U.S. Navy - ROFL!!!

[@xMilNav99]

love it

[@robertgraffham6440]

With the way that systems have improved to detect surface (especially low) incoming missiles? Perhaps it's time to have missiles that come in from extremely high (the edge of outer space)? How many radars/detection systems can track vertical incoming?

[@DerpEye]

So, who are they gonna fight with this baby? I mean, the only other navies that are worth sinking, probably have their own versions of this. It wouldnt look pretty if an aircraft carrier got hit by one.

[@asmaliahimam9861]

Killer in the air

[@AwakeWheel-fi9tm]

Russia- uh yeah we uhhh Have that... (CHINA GET ME SOME OF THAT) China- You’re asking me for something I don’t have. I have the plastic version if u want it....

[@DavyRo]

Uh yeah Russia has hypersonic ones already deployed. China always copies cheap versions of the original??? Who did they copy 5g off? You've never left your country have you? Try visiting one of their cities one of the bigger ones. Everything about them are so technologically superior to any major US city you have to see them to believe. If you do ever visit take a tour on one of their trains and you'll soon realise what you think you know isn't reality, everything your media tells you try researching a different countries opinion of the same subject. You'll realise there's a reason the US has been paying Russia 82million dollars for a seat in the rockets to get to get to the ISS for the past decade. 1400 launches of a Soyaz most reliable, safe and dependable rocket in history. Same rockets deliver the biggest and most lethal Atomic warhead ever built. Respect others and they won't shock you. Being arrogant in wars against any opposition will get you defeated. After all over 1 trillion spent and after 18 years a bunch of rag tag cave dwellers called the Taliban have just about taken over all of Afghanistan.

[@AwakeWheel-fi9tm]

Davy Ro are you Russian? Because first of all the US has not only some of the best tech, but Chinese Tech is stolen from everyone. Also, although I know Russia has good tech, they don’t have the economy to hold what we hold. Listen, I know. Russia has good tech. But so does the US, and the US most likely has better tech. Not only because of their diversity, but also because of the economy. Russia simply doesn’t have that. Can we just agree China is a piece of shit at least? Also, I was memeing

[@AwakeWheel-fi9tm]

Davy Ro also, we have been the way in war we are because we are forced into it. Our opponents make us do things we know aren’t right. Why am I saying we? I’m Argentine 😀 So no, I’m not a huge fan of the US. But I’m not a huge fan of Russia or China.

[@frankrenda2519]

@@AwakeWheel-fi9tm what do you mean by american diversity

[@mayamaya2068]

Very scary

[@comcastjohn]

How many channels do you narrate bud? This is the third I know of so far!

[@CarlosGonzalez-kt5be]

THANKS YOU FOR THE VIDEO ....

[@vivekchoudhary9301]

India 🇮🇳 already buying this missile

[@nathan-ck3je]

Where did you get $3 million USD from?

[@nitride8]

Well, it turns out the almighty Moskva could be sank by missiles developed in the 80s. Who could have thought?