KARL BARTH PART2 DAVID CLOUGH

[@frankdsouza2425]

This is, on several counts, not merely devoid of faults, but absolutely outstanding. Congratulations and warm thanks to all involved in producing it

[@davinson6678]

This channel has become my favourite KZbin channel ! Thank you

[@StJohnsNottingham]

Thank you Davinson for your encouragement It is much appreciated

[@williamjayaraj2244]

Thank you for the message on Karl Barth. Good.

[@bayreuth79]

With reference to Barth's rejection of "natural theology", it seems to me that the bible itself indicates that "natural theology" is a legitimate theological exercise. I'm referring to Paul's letter to the Romans, for instance.

[@Onyemachris]

If I understood it clearly, Barth rejection of 'natural theology' is due to he felt it is wrong place to start theological work. I wonder if he will consider 'Natural theology' as a legitimate ( cf Rom 1) but not a starting point.

[@bayreuth79]

@ORAKAR I studied with David Clough, so I know what you mean by the "uhh"ing

[@MaxGravitas]

Too esoteric, too academic, and not designed enough for the layman who wants to know about Barth.

[@Thomasrice07]

try this kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z2mVoKGLmtGjfac

[@Thomasrice07]

and this kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGPJlWiVm5Z3n5I