KARNA Thaa Sabse Bada VILLAIN - महाभारत की अनसुनी कहानियां | Ft. Abhinav Agarwal | TAMS 23

[@AwaaraMusaafir]

Episode kaisa lagaa? Accha lagaa toh like button zarur se dabaaye! ♥️ ✨ Ami Ganatra on Ramayan - kzbin.info/www/bejne/j2e0ZpumiaathLM ✨ Apna Bhagya Badlo - kzbin.info/www/bejne/b53Ohptqqb-HedE Want to get featured on the podcast? Write to us on [e-mail]

[@niyug-tp8rh]

Bas Karo yar Sab kalpan hai

[@harekrishna2291]

श्लोक 4.14 copy न मां कर्माणि लिम्पन्ति न मे कर्मफले स्पृहा । इति मां योऽभिजानाति कर्मभिर्न स बध्यते ॥ १४ ॥ शब्दार्थ न-कभी नहीं; माम्-मुझको; कर्माणि-सभी प्रकार के कर्म; लिम्पन्ति-प्रभावित करते हैं; न-नहीं; मे-मेरी; कर्म-फले-सकाम कर्म में; स्पृहा-महत्त्वाकांक्षा; इति-इस प्रकार; माम्-मुझको; य:-जो; अभिजानाति-जानता है; कर्मभि:-ऐसे कर्म के फल से; न-कभी नहीं; स:-वह; बध्यते-बँध पाता है ।. अनुवाद play_arrowpause मुझ पर किसी कर्म का प्रभाव नहीं पड़ता, न ही मैं कर्मफल की कामना करता हूँ। जो मेरे सम्बन्ध में इस सत्य को जानता है, वह भी कर्मों के फल के पाश में नहीं बँधता।

[@harekrishna2291]

​@@niyug-tp8rh श्लोक 7.15 copy न मां दुष्कृतिनो मूढा: प्रपद्यन्ते नराधमा: । माययापहृतज्ञाना आसुरं भावमाश्रिता: ॥ १५ ॥ शब्दार्थ न-नहीं; माम्-मेरी; दुष्कृतिन:-दुष्ट; मूढा:-मूर्ख; प्रपद्यन्ते-शरण ग्रहण करते हैं; नर-अधमा:-मनुष्यों में अधम; मायया-माया के द्वारा; अपहृत-चुराये गये; ज्ञाना:-ज्ञान वाले; आसुरम्-आसुरी; भावम्-प्रकृति या स्वभाव को; आश्रिता:-स्वीकार किये हुए ।. अनुवाद play_arrowpause जो निपट मूर्ख हैं, जो मनुष्यों में अधम हैं, जिनका ज्ञान माया द्वारा हर लिया गया है तथा जो असुरों की नास्तिक प्रकृति को धारण करने वाले हैं, ऐसे दुष्ट मेरी शरण ग्रहण नहीं करते।

[@planetearth1507]

​@@niyug-tp8rhReality hai bhai Kalpana nahi...

[@niyug-tp8rh]

@@planetearth1507 Lolz Koi proof ?

[@pavankasle8857]

The Ones who read The Mahabharata knows the Truth , Others watch TV serials and believe it.

[@subhadeepmandal2221]

Everyone reads Mahabharat much b4 it came as serial or movies

[@coolfreaks68]

​@@subhadeepmandal2221I have read Mahabharata before I watched it in TV. Karna was the only donor in Mahabharata. Everybody else was either beggar or usurper in Mahabharata. War is not everything. The War spaned mere 18 days. That's why Karna is great. Sri Krishna did the last rites of Karna on his own hand. He didn't do it for Bheeshma or Yudhishthir or Arjuna.

[@mrssb3278]

युधिष्ठिर और अर्जुन कृष्ण जी के बाद मारे है न की कर्ण की जैसे । और रही बात कर्ण की तो जब वो मारा गया था तब पांडव और दूर्यधान के बीच मैं लड़ाई हो रहा था इसीलिए उन्होंने ऐसा किया और भीष्म जी के वक्त तो ऐसा कोई दुविधा नहीं आई थी ​@@coolfreaks68

[@VikasRawat-wc2vl]

​@@coolfreaks68Arjun supporter nhi manne ge 😅

[@AmarHongekar]

​@@coolfreaks68to phir Raja shibi kon he,

[@jayk7447]

The Mystery of Mahabharata is that almost all Main Characters have their own Right and Wrong Both, The Moral of the Mahabharat Katha is to Keep Dharma High above All under any circumstances.

[@vibhutisood7826]

Exactly each character got his/her point which kind of depicts human nature and encourages to keep dharma above all

[@sajisebastian8412]

True .....both kurav and pandav are equally right and same time wrong toooo.

[@Ourbhaktichannel-mz6jq]

@@sajisebastian8412 In simple words, in the pursuit of their personal duties, everyone forgets that they also live in a society. Due to their mutual enmity and ignorance, this problem spreads from home to society.

[@AestheticEditors]

The moral of story is : never Fight gambling game between brothers, Never trust Dharma Rescuve you , Never disrespect women, And the fight is between your problems not you between him or her , so guyz clear your mind , we are guest to this earth , so make money make name make fame , people will recognise you after your death also , so just do enjoy your present , dont lose your present of thimking about future or suffering of past , enjoy the moment , listen to everyone follow no one , Take care of your Parents & ur health

[@purpleshine6832]

Some script writer somewhere twisted the Mahabharata to say that draupadi laughed at duryodhana. 2 generations actually believed this to be true. Only because we have social media now and ami and this sir are telling that draupadi never laughed, we know it was never there in the original Mahabharata. In this way, fictionalising books and giving them creative freedom will propagate false narratives and make people laugh at their own religion or go away from it without even knowing the truth. It's a very dangerous thing to do. If these many versions exist, know one will know the true version after a certain point of time.

[@good114]

In bori ce, it is clearly stated that vastraharn is an interpolation, 2 generations passed , but none cared to read the authenticity 😢

[@good114]

1. bhai, saree traditional culture hain, phele aurate ekavastra phenti thi 2. if y consider virat war, tb arjun ne khha tha ki unse ghandiv 65 saal pheli milli hain, uss hisab se abhimanyu 65+ years hona chaiye, but dikhaya jata hain 16 3. droupadi ke sirph 1 patti tha [yudhisthir] but stories ne usse paach patti bnna diya😭 , aur thi to mata kunti ne bhi dropadi ko whhi khha tha jo karn ne khha tha 4. krishn ne karn ko vrish khha tha, vrish mtlb dharmatma 5. karn ko nhhi ptta tha ti ashwasen uske dhanush mein baitha hain, uska apna arjun se pratishod tha 6. arjun subhadra ka koi love angle ye sb nhhi tha, usne jbardasti usse uthaya tha, tb krishn ne bhi arjun ko bola tha ki ye glt hain

[@dwapar_scriptures]

​@@good114 source ??

[@ashutoshdwivedi4513]

Why draupadi didn't laugh at duryodhan

[@SasukeUchiha-c1q]

​@@good114it also stated that draupadi laughed at duryodhana

[@Rjun103]

Arjuna is Real warrior of mahabharata 🥰👍🙏jai shree krishna ❤️

[@KaminiSaini-p9i]

Tm khud pdhi h mahabhart

[@KaminiSaini-p9i]

Tm khud pdhi h mahabhart

[@shivichauhan4502]

​@@KaminiSaini-p9i didi jo bta rha h vo expert hai usne apni zindagi k Kai saal Lgaye hai smjhi 😂 Isly no dialogue Or vese v serial me to Karn aaj v great hai q tnsn Le rhi ho

[@Chakraborty_here04]

​@@shivichauhan4502 par asli mai greatest warrior tho Arjun hi the!🏹🧡

[@sahilsahitya7595]

​@@Chakraborty_here04 no karna is hero not Arjuna samjhe

[@yatendragoswami5761]

This is reality ye kaliyug Hai Yahaa karna bhi hero Hai or Ravan bhi😢

[@IndianHeart07]

Multiverse के अनुसार काकभूषांडी ने ११ बार रामायण ऑर १६ बार महाभारत देखे हे diffrent universe and different time line में तो तुम क्या ही कर्ण ऑर रावण की बात करते हो

[@brajeshpatra9750]

​@IndianHeart07 aur Har baar adharmi kamjor hi they, Dharm veer sadaiv Shakti maan

[@brajeshpatra9750]

Ji sahi kaha aapne

[@cyberattackers]

@@yatendragoswami5761 es hisaab se toh tu bhi hero hi hua .... Kyuki tujhme bhi toh ek ravan hai .....karan or ravan me diffrence hai ye jaan le

[@a.ktigeras3504]

Virat yudhh ke bare me aap galat bata rahe ho. bhishm pitama ne pratigya li thi ki wo stree , kinnar upar shastra nahi uthaega isi karan unhone sikhandani ke samne apna shastra tyag diya tha ...lekin aapne virat yudhh me pitmah bhishm ko bhi lada ke hara diaya

[@ringostarr1038]

KARNA WAS A GOOD MAN, IN ORIGINAL MAHABHARATHA - This o.o is the whole point of his character arc, how a good man, supports Adharma & meets his end. Karna does not knowinglt shoot snake arrow. The snake sat on the arrow without Karna knowing, as the snake had a vendata against Arjun. When it missed, first time, it went back to Karna to ask his permission this time, but Karna said no. He wants to win by himself.

[@sakritkafle3311]

Was searching for this comment

[@r.b.8018]

Which is original Mahabharata?

[@tusharranjan1054]

Nothing like this happened in original mahabharat. Ashwasen never asked karna second time, after karna's arrow got missed, Arjun killed the snake.

[@ringostarr1038]

@@tusharranjan1054 - what bs o.o u type, we believe lol zoomr. There is an entire verse about the snake. o.o foos tryin so hard to rewrite Mahabharatha, which has multi levels but these mistakes we call zoomrs tryin so hard to pretend they understand mahabharatha lol

[@ringostarr1038]

@@r.b.8018 o.o the one that u tried to re-write

[@krishna-thecreator]

I have some doubts 1.What If lord Krishna didn't save Arjuna while karna used nagastra 2.What if karna used Vijaya dhanush which was used by lord shiva, from starting only. Because he used that bow only for last 3 days 3.Why Arjuna didn't kill when karna had Dhanush in his hand ? 4. why Arjuna killed when karna has no weapon in his hand 5. What if Arjuna and karna fights without any odds ? It's not about movie or serial, I'm just curious

[@surajbhalerao5259]

Add one more question if karna was weak than why Indra dev takes karna kunthal and kavach

[@RajatAgrawal-v5n]

He got vijaya dhanush cuz of curse that parshuram gave him . He got dhanurvidhya by faking out his caste .parshuramji got angry and cursed him but after that he realised that he was curious and so excited to learn brahmastra so he gave him a rath or a chariotee which was the strogest in the mahabharat . After that he also gave him vijaya dhanush Sorry meri english thodi bad h but yeah vijaya dhanush koi mamuli dhanush nai h the person who holds it will be invicible in battle aur may be parshuramji ne bola ho ise 1 hi baar use kr skte ho?😊

[@DoomedVortex]

@@surajbhalerao5259 simple he was weak but unkillable. A mosquito may be tiny and fragile but its persistence and ability to evade make it more troublesome than its strength. Its weakness is overshadowed by how hard it is to get rid of.

[@Ramitinfotech]

​@@surajbhalerao5259Yes that's the big point..

[@harikaraorao7514]

Part 1:- Was Vijaya bow of Karna Mahadeva's bow ? No. It was not. Vijaya bow was bow of Indra. From Indra it went to Parashurama and then to him as per Karna himsrlf. No where Vijaya bow is mentioned as bow of Mahadeva. Even Rukmi is descibred having Vijaya bow. So we don't know for sure who really had original Vijaya bow or karna was just bluffing. My bow, Vijaya, is supreme among all weapons. Vishvakarma constructed it for Indra’s sake. It was with this that Shatakratu vanquished large numbers of daityas. In the ten directions, the daityas were confounded because of its roar. Shakra gave that revered weapon to Bhargava and Bhargava gave that divine and supreme bow to me.With this, I will fight against the mighty-armed Arjuna, foremost among victorious ones, like Indra fighting in a battle against all the assembled daityas. BORI CE translation by Bibek Debroy Karna Parva Chapter 1172(22) Part 2:- Was Vijaya bow used for Destruction of Tripura? No again. The bow used by Mahadeva to destroy Tripura was constructed by Vishwakarma from Mountain and it was the same bow which Shri Ram broke in Mithila. So it is not true. Parashurama himself said in mithila that shri Ram broke the bow used by Shiva to scorch Tripura. Oh, best one among men, out of the two longbows gods gave one to restive Trymbaka, God Shiva for a combat with demon Tripura, and oh, Kakutstha, that bow alone is the annihilator of Tripura, the demon... and you have broken that alone. Part 3:- Is true that if Vijaya bow is Shiva's bow then the holder of Vijaya's bow can never be defeated ? Again no and false. From first two parts it is already answered that Vijaya bow is not the bow of Mahadeva. And whether bow is Vijaya or some other bow it never guarantees victory to anyone. It is warrior who fights battles not bow. Victory and defeat depends on warriors. Karna himself was defeated on 17th day by Bhima with Vijaya bow in hand. Even Karna himself or Parashurama or Indra never made this absurd claim. The son of the wind god powerfully stretched the bow back, all the way up to his ears. Wishing to kill Karna, the great archer angrily released the arrow. Having been thus released by the powerful one, the arrow, with a sound like that of the vajra or thunder, struck Karna in that battle, with a force like that of the vajra against a mountain. O extender of the Kuru lineage! Thus struck by Bhimasena, the son of the suta, the leader of an army, lost his senses and sank down on the floor of his chariot. On seeing that the son of the suta had lost his senses, the lord of Madra bore Karna, the adornment of a battle, away on the chariot. When Karna was defeated, the large army of the sons of Dhritarashtra was driven away by Bhimasena, like an army of the danavas by Indra.” ’ BORI CE translation by Bibek Debroy Karna Parva Chapter 1184(34). So neither Vijaya bow was bow of Mahadeva , nor it was used in battle and destruction of Tripura and nor it gives any victory to wielder.

[@neerajbholan5369]

The problem is people want to see things in black and white. The world doesn't work like that. These so called experts clearly know that karn is that grey character in mahabharatha whom people have interpreted and perceived differently. He is the most humane character in mahabharatha unlike all the unreal characters. He is a good man who had committed some unforgivable deeds and sins out of hate, jealousy, anger and pride. That's us. That's a human. Imperfect and forever improving. The guy before the war knew that he was in the wrong and his ultimate fate is fatality handed to him by his arch rival. He accepts all these infront of vasudev. There is a long ass intimate conversation between karn and vasdev before the war where he is vulnerable. He reveals himself there and you can clearly see the good in him. Even vasudev calls him "narashrestha"-the best among men and offers him the throne saying that he is equally capable to yudhistir if not more and deserves it as a seniormost kountaya. The guy outright rejects it. These people won't mention these interactions. They just want bash a beloved character, create controvesry and benefit from it.

[@garimellaharipriya]

Ohh finally someone said it... Thank you 👍 totally agree with you 😊

[@220kVSstnHVPNLKaithal]

Starplus ki mahabharata dekh kr comment krne waale pasu, aali mahabharat padd ,, sale whats app university k chapri

[@neerajbholan5369]

@@220kVSstnHVPNLKaithal aali mahabharath tere ghar mein milta hoga woh kya hota hai mujhe nahi pata. Baki bori ce aur kmg mahabharata mein padh chuka hoon.

[@PrayagrajPatgir]

Yes Karna Is Great

[@wolfeinstine6677]

​@@neerajbholan5369 bori Mahabharata critical edition padho

[@akramakhtar7665]

chinta mat kro vo real wali Mahabharat bta rahe hai tumhari Ekta Kapoor wali me Karna aaj bhi upar hai sbse😂

[@Voiceofshree]

Epic bro 👍

[@ritullathiya5192]

real wali ? mythology real bi hoti he ?

[@akramakhtar7665]

@@ritullathiya5192 haan kitab padhna use kehte hai real wali

[@akramakhtar7665]

@@ritullathiya5192 in that book karna lost twice to Satyaki and Bheem lost to Abhimanyu in 1 on 1 battle on the day he was killed lost to Arjun during Swayamwar ViratYudh and many more occasions but they never showed it on Television they all are just portraying negative character as a hero

[@cyberattackers]

Haa Bhai ye Jo mahabharat bta rhe h ye inke sapne me Hui thi ..... Real me karna hi powerful h

[@Red-Hood12]

In Virat Yuddh, Arjuna (while being a half-man as Brihannala, due to Urvashi's curse) single handedly defeated entire kuru warriors (along with their army) all alone. It's because Karna had Kavach kundal for his protection from death since birth. And Bhishma had a boon that he cannot die without his own wish. And Dronacharya being a guru of Arjun, he won't kill him. And Ashwatthama had a stone on his forehead, thus made him kinda immortal. And Kripacharya also 'Chiranjeevi'. And also Duryodhan's Kavach given by Dronacharya which were as effective as Karna's Kavach, so Duryodhan won't die either. Only Arjuna was without any boon or protection- PURE TALENT.

[@Ganguli1999]

No arjun had everything along with him he is lord krishna

[@Red-Hood12]

@@Ganguli1999 Shri Hari Vishnu, divided himself in two parts, i.e. Nara and Narayana. Narayana is directly Shri Hari Vishnu, who again incarnated as Rama, Krishna, and so on. Arjun was the incarnation of Nara, hence in a way he was part of Prabhu Hari Vishnu. (For reference, read the story of Badrinath Dhaam) So, you are piling up your own sins by saying such things about Arjuna.. Arjuna Shri Krishna bhagwan kaa hi NAR roop hai, Arjuna Shri Krishna kaa Mitra nahi balki unki ki praan urjaa hai jo Dwapar Yugaa me Alag alag Avatar ke roop mein prakat hue thee, jo Arjuna ko gaali deta hai wo indirectly Shri Krishna ko hi gaali de Raha hai, jaha par Arjuna ki burai hoti hai waha par Shri Krishna bhagwan KABHI NAHI aate. Magar in gadho ko kaun samjhaye.

[@manjunathmeti7576]

But karna didn't used Vijaya dhanasu every time as Arjuna used gandivi danssu everytime, instead karna used his vijya bow on 17th day of kurukshetra war.

[@Red-Hood12]

@@manjunathmeti7576 karna cannot even handle Gandiva Dhanush, it was extremely powerful, can only be handled by very powerful warrior like Arjuna. But Arjuna didn't use Gandiva in Draupadi's swayamvar where he defeated karna and other kings using simple arrows used for hitting the target 🎯

[@technikdhanuk4773]

​@@manjunathmeti7576main point to yahi hai Karna ko sb villain adharmi ye sb kehte hai to koi dikkat nhi hai but Jb uski kabiliyat ke bare me bolte hai ki nhi wo to har kisi se haar jata Arjun ke saamne kuch nhi tha Tb wo sare point chupa lete hai jaise Jb guru dronacharya ji ne Arjun ko wada kiya tha ki Arjun sarvshrest dhanurdhari banenge to jb ekluvya ki kushalta dekh kr dono shishya aur guru aashcharya chakit ho gye ki ye isne kaise seekha jo ki Bina guru dronacharya ki shishya ke bs unki pratima bana ke saamne self training krta tha tb unhone uska anghutha manga Arjun ko sarvshrest dhanurdhari banane ke liye Karna ne jb bhramastra ki Vidya seekhna caha to mana kr diya guru dronacharya ji ne bola ki abhi tum uske liye saksham nhi ho Pr parshuram ji ne karna ko Vidya diya jb jb karna ko mauka milta tha apni kabiliyat ko proof krne ka waha Arjun pehle hi upasthit rhte the Isliye wo Arjun ko apna shatru maan te rhe Draupadi ke swayamvar me karna ko mauka nhi diya gya apni kabiliyat proof krne ka aur waha pe draupadi ne bohot kuch bola tha karn ke bare me baad me Arjun swayamvar me Jeet gye uske baad se karna ke man me badle ka bhav utpan hua Theek hai karna villain hi the manshikta se unne duryodhana ki har ek cheez me saath diya Sb Arjun ko sarvshrest dhanurdhari bulate rehte the Kai baar Arjun aur karna ka aamna saamna hua par Arjun bhari isiliye pade kyuki unke pass gandhiva tha har baar ye baat chupa liya jata hai Lekin jab karna ki shiksha parshuram ji dwara hui to unhone karna ko kai Divya astro ki shiksha aur bhramastra ki shiksha aur ek dhanush bhi diya tha jo ki Vijay dhanush tha jo ki shiv ji ka dhanush hai ye dhanush jiske haath me hoga usko protect bhi karta tha aur iski accuracy force speed normal human made dhanush se jyada thi jaisa ki gandhiva ki bhi thi Is baar jab karna arjun ke against hote hai to swayam Arjun ke pitaji jo ki indra dev hai wo unse unka kawach kundal maang lete hai Aur mata kunti bhi swayam aa kr karna ko batati hai sari baat ki wo unhi ke purta hai wo Pandavo ke side ho le Par ab tak bohot der ho chuki thi karna ke andar badle ki bhavna aur apna samarth dikhane ki iksha use kurukshetra ki ladai me le gyi Is baar karna Jo ki pehle kabhi Arjun ke saman nhi the Wo ab Arjun par bhari pad rhe the kyuki ab unke paas bhi Divya Vijay dhanush tha Aur unko hara pana Arjun ke liye muskil ho ra tha Fir to pata hi hoga karna ko mara kaise gya hai Karna ko ekdum tuch bta Dene ke liye refrences bhagwat geeta se late hai Jb bhagwat geeta Arjun aur sri krishna ke madhya hue conversation hai to usme se karna ke bare me kaha se pata chalega Ved vyasa ji ne bs Mahabharata likhi hai jab sab ho chuka tha yudh ke baad bache the pandav aur Shri Krishna to unhone unke baare me likha aur jitna unko pata chala utna hi likha Aur ved vyasa ji pandava aur Kauravas ke dada ji the Karna ke bare me unhone kuch nhi likha iska matlab ye thodi hai ki karna ke bare me bakiyo ne jo likha wo galat hai Agar yudh hua do paksho ki taraf to do POV honge na ya bs ek POV se dekhkar kisi ko kayar bol do Paida hote hi koi mahan dhanurdhari nhi tha unko sikhaya gya aur Vidya diya gya gandhivadhari Arjun shresth the lekin parshuram ji ki shiksha aur unse yudh niti seekh kar aur vijay dhanush prapt kr karna sarvshrest dhanurdhari Bane Jo ki wo proof nhi kar paye kyuki wo dharma ke virudh khade the aur unka yahi ant tha lekin wo Arjun ki dhanurdhari ki wajah se nhi hare wo duryodhana ke paap ke bhagidhari the isliye hare Unke kiye punya ki wajah se to unko mrityu bhi nhi prapt ho rhi thi

[@anujamarathe8339]

Karna was neither a villain nor a hero. He was a human being. He has good and bad characteristics in him.

[@jaydutta7711]

*@anujamarathe8339* Karna was indeed a villain, not a hero, because he willingly supported Adharma. He was not the only human being; even Arjuna was also a human, but he was much better than Karna. Arjuna had both good and bad characteristics in him, but he always chose the good over the bad, unlike Karna.

[@anujamarathe8339]

@@jaydutta7711 in Mahabharat the 1st villian is Dhrutarashtra who always supported his adharmi son Duryodhan and his wicked ideas and plans to end Pandavas. He also planned to kill Bhim by hugging him.

[@jaydutta7711]

@@anujamarathe8339 I agree 👍

[@soulflower2021]

Karna is a villain gtfo

[@anujamarathe8339]

@@soulflower2021Although he supported Duryodhan ( Adharm) , he has some good characteristics also that other Kouravas didn't have.

[@sudipbashyal1545]

Rip kalki movie😂

[@indiandictator4537]

Prabhash role was very cringe just like karn 😂😂😂

[@Timetraveller123]

@@indiandictator4537yess

[@harikaraorao7514]

He was defeated Fair and Square. Chronology of events :- In battle karna is badly injured and bathed in blood even before his chariot wheel sunk. The wheel of karnas chariot sink in earth. By this time Arjuna had invoked Raudrastra against him but takes back after his chariot wheel sinks. Karna invokes Dharma and asks Arjuna and Krishna to stop. Krishna shows him Mirror by reminding him all his Adharmas right from Poisoning of bhima , abusing and mistreatment of draupadi to deceitful killing of Abhimanyu and rejects his arguments. Karna hangs down Head in Shame and understands that his trick is failed. Krishna asks Arjuna to continue battle. Karna Arjuna battle begins again. Karna invokes Brahmastra from ground with great difficulty and Arjuna counters it with his own Brahmastra. Arjuna fires Agneya Weapon and Karna counters with Varuna astra and covers sky with cloud. Arjuna nullifies Varuna Weapon with Vayavya Weapon. Then Arjuna took out Anjalika arrow and fixed on bow and uttered the speech that if he has practiced ascetic austerities , gratified elders and superiors , and listening to the council of well wishers then let this arrow slay his enemy karna. Arjuna Shoots the Anjalika arrow and it cuts off the Head of Karna. He was killed Fair and Square. He had weapons which he used and countered Arjunas weapons also from ground.. Note :- My Answer is Based on Authentic Versions of Mahabharat BORI CE and KMG.

[@Vansh-c8d]

So taking his armor and shrap of parushuram and rishi this are incient to make him weak for fighiting arjun

[@darkknight10652]

​@@Vansh-c8d he was always weaker than Arjun lol 😆 and why should he have a divya kavach kundal? Did arjun had any divine kavach kundal?? You pointing out that Karn needed kavach kundal proves his weakness against arjun

[@dineshkumarmishra2393]

@@Vansh-c8d after parshuram curse he himself gave Karna Vijay Dhanush . Without vijay dhanush he cant even defeat Sahdev

[@OccupationalTherapist01]

Whatever you say, the proverb still exists “Danbir Karna” from time immemorial.

[@jaysonkar2089]

Ekdum Sahi

[@Arandomguyat1]

Right

[@tonguewarrior5020]

Daanveer Raja Harishchandra ✅ Karn was not a Daanveer. Infact he "exchanged" his Kawach to get Shakti Parv astra from Indradev It was not a DAAN but a trade !!

[@pooshan99]

If Ambani is giving jio free is he danveer? Waise hi adani godrej Ambani daan karenge aur dusre taraf galat karenge apne bete ko Aston Martin hit and run case mai jhok denge tou wo badhiya nahi hai😅

[@jigyasukumar2890]

​@@tonguewarrior5020Just shut up if it was trade who is going to exachange his immortality only to kill someone.

[@biswadeepkangsabanik5183]

Yahi kali hai... Yaha... Karn, Duryodhan, Ravan aur Indrajeet ka bhi victimisation hota hai.... 😂😂😂😂

[@VISHALKUMAR-yd3qy]

Indrajeet ko maat include kroo Karna ko kr rahe hoo whoo bhi galat hai but Indrajeet sach mai bhaut sahi thaa usne sirf apne Pita ki baat manii hai Indrajeet Mahan hai ❤❤

[@theflybyriders]

Karna is best warrior ever ✌️❤️ Radhe karna 🙏🚩

[@Red-Hood12]

SONY-PUTRA KARNA TV SHOW ek FAKE Show hai jo sirf Karna FANS ke liye hi banaya gayaa hai, magar ismein bhi karna apne raath kaa pahiyaa uthaane mei asamarth hai, ye hai uski taakat. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Red-Hood12]

Itna badaa warrior ki apne rath kaa pahiya bhi nahi uthaa payaa mahabharat yuddh mein 😂😂😂😂

[@aliali115-ny3dv]

Itna bada worrior ka arjun ko usko chal se marna pada ​@@Red-Hood12

[@Red-Hood12]

@@aliali115-ny3dv Even Shikhandi beats Karna also..😆😆😆😆😆😆 ‘ “O great king! Shikhandi, the slayer of Bhishma, roamed around fearlessly and countered Karna with his arrows. Countered, Karna’s lips quivered in rage. He struck Shikhandi between his eyebrows with three arrows. With those arrows stuck there, Shikhandi looked exceedingly beautiful. He was like a silver mountain with three peaks. In the battle, having been thus grievously struck by the son of a suta in the encounter, he pierced Karna with ninety sharp arrows. Karn retreated and failed to counter the arrows of Shikhandi." Karn parv chapter 44(BORI)

[@Red-Hood12]

@@aliali115-ny3dv Karna was so coward, he got scared to fight with Arjuna in the final Mahabharata war, as he already knew, he was going to lose (as usual🤣🤣🤣), so he made an excuse not to fight war as long as Bheeshma was alive, as Duryodhan, this time, would send Karna directly to fight with Arjuna alone (Karna always used to attack Arjuna in Groups and still he loose🤣🤣🤣). But after Bheeshma's fall Karna had no choice but to fight, or else he would be labelled as a 'Coward'. Karna was not rejected by Bheeshma not to participate in the war, it was Karna's own choice. Karna was a KING of Anga Desh, which was a separate Kingdom than Hastinapur, so Bheeshma had NO JURISDICTION over Karna at all, also Bheeshma was a Commander in Chief of Hastinapur, NOT a KING, so he cannot give any order to another King - Karna. Besides that, Duryodhan was a king, so he can give order. (Karna took a vow not to fight alongside Bheeshma as long as Bheeshma was alive - This is clearly mentioned in Ved Vyas ji's Mahabharata), Obviously it was Karna's choice as he could fight separately alongside Kauravas, but he didn’t, CLEARLY HE WAS SCARED OF ARJUNA.

[@ShankarSatyarth]

कर्ण तो फिर भी कर्ण ही था..। 1. कवच का दान भी झूठ था। 2. चार पांडवों को अभयदान झूठ था। 3. कृष्ण के प्रस्ताव को ठुकराना झूठ था। सूर्यपुत्र और विजयधनुष को धारण करने वाले योद्धा कों यूँ ही कुछ भी बोल दो...क्या हीं जाता हैं।

[@krishanamohan6328]

Mahabharat greatest character -legendry karna ❤❤

[@jaymahajan1695]

😂 भाई क्यों इतना दिल पे लेते हो। कर्ण कैसा भी हो पर वास्तव में था तो दुर्योधन के ही साथ। जो भी कृष्ण के विरुद्ध जायेगा वो चाहे कितना भी महान क्यों न हो उसका पतन तय है।

[@Red-Hood12]

Who had a better life, Arjun or Pandavas vs Karna or Kauravas? In all 107 cousin brothers viz. 5 Pandavas, 💯 Kauravas, Karna and Yuyutsu; Duryodhana had best luxurious life, followed by rest 99 brothers and Yuyutsu. In all 6 sons of Devi Kunti, Karna lived best luxurious lifestyle, whole life in grand city 🌆 Hastinapur 🏙️ in home 🏠 of rich and reputed father AdhiRath. In all 5 Pandavas, Arjun 🏹 led most hard life, lived 12+ years more in forest, done more penance and fought more wars. Karna's father AdhiRath was friend of King Dhritarashtra and Karna was friend of Duryodhana since his childhood. As Karna was 10+ years older than Duryodhana, so he used to visit regularly Duryodhana and impressed him a lot since childhood. Devi Kunti and his 5 sons, later returned to HastinaPur. This arrival was not welcomed by Duryodhana and Karna. Karna's Lifestyle: He was born with celestial kavach and kundalas. As long as those things were there no body can kill him. So he was always protected since childhood. Not lived with real parents but always found parenthood. He had the best education from Krupa and Drona and Parasurama. As Karna fans usually tells that he was alone - He had brothers, many wives and children, so he was not alone. He was the best friend of Prince Dhuryodhana. He used to sleep with many women. He lived a luxury lifestyle as a KING. He never went to the forest nor did nobody conspired to kill him. He never did any penance to any God except Lord Surya (of whom he did pooja - Not Tapasya), who was his father. He never went begging. He made digvijay yatra. He died in a big battle. Though he was marked as Suta he became a KING. Very fortunate fellow. Whereas Pandavas who were the rightful owners of a big empire became beggars. They had to fight at every stage of their lives, they were raised and lived most of their life in forests or exile.

[@pritampatel-s6q]

this is kalyuga bro… these idiot karn fan will never think from this pov…

[@kundankanan9074]

Arjun's tough life-- he did fight many wars but also observed his oath very faithfully :P Said to Draupadi that he will remain celibate and then got convinced by Ulupi that celibacy was only meant not copulating with Draupadi.. then enjoyed time in swag log and then again in Manipur. Arjun got weapons and good guidance. Karna tried to break mould, pretended to be brahmin and got curses. Arjun had no such issue, he also pretended to be brahmin at different points, at Draupadi swaymvar, at Jarasandh killing but no issues, no curses,. No doubt Pandav had though life but more than all the affluence of the world, they weren't deprived of love from their mother. Such a shame that "Karna used to sleep with many women" when Yudhisatr himself donated 1000 women during dice game before Draupadi :P . Duryodhan didn't do so many marriages and Yudhistar own intention for dice game was to usurp Duryodhan's kingdom. So he was no saint. But the thing which I didn't like about Karna was his cribbing. I rarely saw Pandavs for cribbing, occasional anguish at Yudhistar but then they still followed his command.

[@hiranmaiP]

ok arjun lied being brahmin but did he aquire any knowledge by lieing as being brahmin as karna did did he hurt anyone as karna hurt parashurama by telling lie nd wat yudhishthir donated 1000 women where is it written show me the proof

[@Red-Hood12]

@@kundankanan9074 Arjuna NEVER tried to pretend Brahmin, they became Brahmins for some time, because they were living in jungles, and they were hiding their identity from Duryodhana to find out his evil plans. To whom did Arjuna lied to??? No one, it's Karna and Duryodhana who were unable to identify Arjuna and other Pandavas in Swayamvar. And Dyut krida was already a set-up to steal Indraprastha from Pandavas, Yudhishthir was forced to play, as ordered by Dhritarashtra himself. And your info is incomplete, Yudhishthir donated both men and women, they were like staff members of Indraprastha kingdom, alongwith Indraprastha, Nothing wrong with that.

[@Red-Hood12]

@@kundankanan9074 Arjuna NEVER tried to pretend Brahmin, they became Brahmins for some time, because they were living in jungles, and they were hiding their identity from Duryodhana to find out his evil plans. To whom did Arjuna lied to??? No one, it's Karna and Duryodhana who were unable to identify Arjuna and other Pandavas in Swayamvar. And Dyut krida was already a setup to steal Indraprastha from Pandavas, Yudhishthir was forced to play, as ordered by Dhritarashtra himself. And your info is incomplete, Yudhishthir donated both men and women, they were like staff members of Indraprastha kingdom, alongwith Indraprastha, Nothing wrong with that.

[@pragynaparamitamallick2365]

Finally writters like this are coming out. Sir and Ami gantra mam.. who are well read and researched, are bursting the myths that has been created by TV.

[@MTechInformationTechnology]

Well researched means changing the original Mahabharata text lmao 😂

[@HarinandS-t9c]

why...ami ganatra mam told mistakes??@@MTechInformationTechnology

[@MTechInformationTechnology]

@@HarinandS-t9c Why changing the original text ?

[@HarinandS-t9c]

im askin wht r the changes she made..like to my knowledge her book served as a summary of most authentic 3 mahabharatas availably right now and its written with user friendly terminologies and explanations..was there any factual mistakes or modifications?can u pls say@@MTechInformationTechnology

[@MTechInformationTechnology]

@@HarinandS-t9c Their books came in later period like 1970 , Mahabharata texts existed in 1868 as Le Mahabharata, Raznama in 14th Century. Why I have to believe a agenda based organization which alters the text ?

[@popukumar1873]

Sony putra karn tv serial wala nahi manenge 😢😢

[@Krishna77787]

Unlog ki chale.. Toh Woh Karn ko Bhagwan Shri Krishna se bhi upar rakh dein 😂😂

[@Krishna77787]

Adhe comment mein... Bhagvan Karn Likha hota hai.. Chamche, Shaitan ke bachon ka 😂😂

[@narayan_sahooo]

Sony putra😂😂😂😂

[@अनुरागझा-र7ज]

Wo chaye tih mahabharat ko hamari mahabharat बना देगे😅

[@JohnSnow-dd2gm]

😂😂😂

[@drashokkumartripathy1573]

Karna was a real villain, due to his jealousy & pride the mahabharat war resulted & 50 lakh warriors died . Duryodhana fought the war depending on Karna mainly. Karna instigated Duryodhana to pullout clothes from devi Droupadi s body. Karna was a main villain to kill Abhimanyu along with sapta rathi.

[@CentralSkynet001]

First villain is dhritarashtra because he didn't provided the throne to pandu sons as promised then he supported his evil son ideas & wrong doing.

[@stylishkrishna4673]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jqrOfqGhpKpjbK8si=y20jf6Q6GQZYVy1J

[@Randomlyyyyyyy]

I have heard so many podcasts and sab ka yahi question aaj ka generation yeh padhega nahi isko modify karna hai kya...simple answer to this is both are epics are relevant irrespective of time. Original text is so powerful ki usko "aaj ki generation " ke liye modify karne ki zaroorat nahi hai balki aaj ki generation ko Original text padhna chahiye

[@darkclouds6246]

Original to destroy ho chukaa hai 1000saal pehle hi

[@uddiptadas7428]

how to read original

[@surendramaharjan8339]

Never forget that karma never use Vijay dhanush before main war..

[@factsjano7178]

Dhanush chalane se skill nahi aajati

[@abhisheksn2485]

@@factsjano7178 idiot, intensity of arrow depended on the bow they were using.

[@amresh_singh_patel]

Main war me bhi Krishna jee ne Arjun ko two times save Kiya tha shi se study kro​@@factsjano7178

[@rahul12-_]

People without brain :- अर्जुन महान था, बिना पढ़े बताते हैं क्योंकि उनके साथ श्री कृष्ण थे, श्री कृष्ण द्रौपदी के लिए पांडवो के पक्ष में थे 😅😅 क्या कर्ण ने ये जानते हुए भी कि कवच और कुंडल दान में देने से वो युद्ध में मारा जा सकता है अपना कवच और कुंडल दान में नहीं दिया था इंद्र को ???? क्या श्री कृष्ण ने काई बार कर्ण के हाथो अर्जुन के प्राण नहीं बचाये????? क्या भार्गव अस्त्र से युधिष्ठिर, भीम, नकुल, शदेव और यहां तक कि अर्जुन भी भाग कर अपने शिवर में नहीं गए थे 😅😂😂😂 क्या कर्ण ने अपनी माता कुंती को वचन नहीं दिया था कि वो युधिष्ठिर, भीम, नकुल, शहदेव के प्राण नहीं लेगा , क्या अंतिम युद्ध से ठीक पहले मानसिक रूप से कामजोड़ करने के लिए श्रीकृष्ण ने नहीं बताया था कि पांडव तुम्हारे अपने भाई हैं?😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@mamalinayak6263]

Ravan v karn se pehele Mahan gyani dhanurdhari tha bijaya pakdne wala kabhi achha ni ho sakta jisne uss nari ko beshya kaha unki maa v kuch devta se bacha prapta ki thi jisi maa behen bacha pede karenge usse kabhi dharmvan nehi kehsakte

[@AnishSingh-tu8oz]

Karn ek negative character tha 70% but 30% positive tha jaha Tak Mai research kiya hu 4 years me

[@Itsjay-pc4mv]

Can you tell me anything about Karn good bad anything his character and behaviour he was a great man aur not

[@MrX-so6yq]

Bhai admin agar apni okat na dikhaye to m sabit kr du Karan kya tha ... Lekin harami sala bar bar mera comment Delet kr rha h 😂😂😂

[@forrelief_17]

Bhai ap kisiko ek rupee Dene me das bar sochoge or ap Karn ko 70 % negative bol rahe ho. Karna sabse bada danwir tha 🙃

[@advaitnaik6824]

Can u elaborate those 70 and 30

[@deb12337]

How cud you reach in this conclusion? Pls clarify 70% negative 30% positive 🎉🎉

[@Krishna_Pokharel]

About the question where was the Krishna. You need to look at it in different way. “Play your own game people, yes I’m there but I will not play everybody’s game. Yes I’m born as a human as a awatar doesn’t mean you’ll not do anything.” So anybody looking for different answer this is what I found out and one famous sentence said by Krishna “hesitation is worst than any crime”.

[@vibhavraikar4233]

this thought of yours is exactly what happend with mahabharta, people tried speculating and went on adding there own fantasy

[@jaydutta7711]

​@@vibhavraikar4233 There is additional fantasy exist in Mahabharata. Everything is clearly written in the scriptures of Mahabharata.

[@KrishnaXArjun]

Karn was the biggest Villian of Mahabharat. But today's illetrate people trying hard to make him a hero. Shameless thing😢

[@abirpandey7339]

Your name is saying it all , keep crying womp womp 😂

[@KrishnaXArjun]

@@abirpandey7339 ole ole 😂😂 Karn ke itne adharm ginwa dunga puchh mat. Now you keep crying womp womp😂😂

[@akhil_Khatrii]

​@@KrishnaXArjunAbe Arjun fan boy ki fatiii padi h karn k Arjun se kahi adhik bhakt h isliye 😂

[@KrishnaXArjun]

@@akhil_Khatrii ghanta fategi meri 😂😂. Karn ki fati rehti thi isliye bhaag jaata tha 😂😂

[@akhil_Khatrii]

@@KrishnaXArjun haha very funny kiske pass kavach kundal ho vijay dhanush ho physically itni strength ho ki jarasandh ko ek din me hrade vo bhagega drr ke😂😂😂😂😂

[@annaikmohan]

Dhuryodhan doesn't know dice gambling and seeks support of Saguni whereas Yuthistra also not familiar with that gambling, was not interested to seek support of Krishna! Until unless you seek and pray for assistance, even God will not come for suport!

[@Pkr-y17]

Esa hai to tata by by bhgwan ko kisi ka rape ho ra hoga to use bhgwan ko pukarna chahiye tbhi help hogi wrna ni hogi lol

[@jagannathdas4568]

Nice to hear from a Knowledgeable person🙏 Vyasa Mahabharata & Valmiki Ramayana are Original and all should read them.. Ideally no one has "right" to write anything fictional using Ramayana & Mahabharata names.

[@GautamDutiya]

Arjuna❤️❤️❤️❤️👑👑👑👑

[@-ob1vx]

fattu arjun fanboy 😂

[@swapnilmishra3537]

​@@-ob1vxfattu to karn tha arjun ko dekhke kutte ki tarah bhagta tha virat yudh ho ya fir dropdi swayamvar yudh ho ya 14th day ka kurukshetra ka yudh ho 😂

[@Red-Hood12]

If Arjuna has to cheat, to kill Karna, he would have done it earlier and with ease. As Arjuna had ‘Sammohan Astra', - which makes the enemy to either sit on the chariots, leaving all his weapons keep aside, or hallucinated or fainted. After that Arjuna can kill the enemy easily. He could use that weapon in Mahabharata war, to kill all his opponents easily, but he didn't, as it's an unfair means to fight a war. In Virat yuddh, he used this weapon merely to stop fight. He didn't kill any big warrior afterward - like Bheeshma, Drona, Kripa, Karan, Ashwatthama, Duryodhan etc. He could have killed Karna there and then. And if you say that Karna had kawach kundal, he won't die, then Arjuna could have forcefully taken his kawach kundal from his body, as Karna was hallucinated or fainted. But instead, Arjuna spared all those lives, including the life of Duryodhan and Dusshasana, which showed Arjuna always stood by the side of Dharma and Truth. I wonder how anybody got a boon as kawach kundal since birth. It's obvious that those kawach kundal belong to the Indra loka. So how did Karna got it since birth? Because everyone else in all the 4 yugas, who got some kind of boon either by doing some hard penance to the Gods, or some good deeds. So How did Karna got Kawach kundal since birth? It means he was extremely lucky to get it free of cost, OR he did a penance to the Lord Surya on his previous life when he was a deamon named Dambhodabhava, who got 1000 Kawach kundal, out of which 999 were destroyed by Nara and Narayan (Arjuna and Krishna).

[@SurendraBhardwaj1]

What an Amazing episode, so much unknown stories about Mahabharata. Thank you so much for bringing such good content Jai Shree Ram 🙏

[@AwaaraMusaafir]

Jai Shree Ram! 😄

[@ajaysinghjamwalaj]

OOO Bhai c...... Bna rhaye hain

[@shashank4619]

Ye 2 take ka baniya fake gyan de raha

[@parmarvipul5166]

wahi log karna ke fan he jo tv serial ko dekh ke prabhavit hue he 😂

[@gol309]

Fan to dev indra bhi the tabhi to kavach kundal kiraye se lene aye the😂

[@Red-Hood12]

​@@gol309How stupid Indra was - to save his son, he gave a deadly weapon so that Karna would kill his son Arjuna." ??- Sarcastically speaking. (Obviously it's a TRANSACTION, NOT ANY CHARITY)

[@Red-Hood12]

​@@gol309By the way - those kawach kundal belong to Indra Lokaa, of which Indra dev was the rightful owner.

[@vanivinayak1092]

महाभारत के युद्ध में भी कार्ण कई बार भीम और सात्यकि के जैसे योद्धाओं से हार चुका था यद्यपि कर्ण ने भी उनको हराया

[@himanshudutta609]

kab haraya😂😂😂😂

[@annoy.505]

Kai baar arjun bje hara haii

[@Red-Hood12]

SONY-PUTRA KARNA TV SHOW ek FAKE Show hai jo sirf Karna FANS ke liye hi banaya gayaa hai, magar ismein bhi karna apne raath kaa pahiyaa uthaane mei asamarth hai, ye hai uski taakat. 😂😂😂😂😂

[@gopalverma1689]

@@himanshudutta609 kiski baat kar rha hai -karn ne Arjun ko to nhi haraya pr karn ko sabhi ne haraya hai proof chahiye hoga to bolna me bhej dunga ,

[@gopalverma1689]

@@himanshudutta609 karn viraatyudh aur Gandharva me pata hi kya raftaar se bhaga tha ,, aur Mahabharat me bhi Hara tha abhimanyu, satyaki, Bheem(in Archery 🤡) and Arjun se to everytime , proof chahiye hoga to respected hoke maang Lena Mera se🤗

[@Dailylifetalkparamshanti]

😊😊 read original Mahabharata book 😊😊in ur home... before listening 🎧 any one...my younger brother n sister of bharat 😊

[@ranjanagoswami7086]

Where we can listen

[@good114]

1. bhai, saree traditional culture hain, phele aurate ekavastra phenti thi 2. if y consider virat war, tb arjun ne khha tha ki unse ghandiv 65 saal pheli milli hain, uss hisab se abhimanyu 65+ years hona chaiye, but dikhaya jata hain 16 3. droupadi ke sirph 1 patti tha [yudhisthir] but stories ne usse paach patti bnna diya😭 , aur thi to mata kunti ne bhi dropadi ko whhi khha tha jo karn ne khha tha 4. krishn ne karn ko vrish khha tha, vrish mtlb dharmatma 5. karn ko nhhi ptta tha ti ashwasen uske dhanush mein baitha hain, uska apna arjun se pratishod tha 6. arjun subhadra ka koi love angle ye sb nhhi tha, usne jbardasti usse uthaya tha, tb krishn ne bhi arjun ko bola tha ki ye glt hain

[@darkclouds6246]

Original vedvyas Mahabharat destroyed by 1000years ago what you said was not original

[@Abhishek-ii3ri]

​@@darkclouds6246 iss chaman agarwal bol raha iske paas vedvyaas mahabharat hai🤣🤣 iss chaman agarwal ko ye nahi pata hai ki aaj ki mahabharat uske shishya ke hai😂😂

[@rishabhpandey7958]

Padhkar ayo bewkoof phir bolo bhot bezzati hui hai apke karn ki😂😂​@@Abhishek-ii3ri

[@rupanshpatel]

Esa mat karo bro Star Plus Wale karn me fans bhadak jayenge 😂

[@ashokbasfor6385]

Aur puch baap wale v😂😂

[@Red-Hood12]

Karna FANS - Karna's Kawach kundal was taken by Lord Indra Deceitfully: No, it was a pure transaction between Karna and Lord Indra. If Lord Indra was so fond of Karna's donations, Why did Lord Indra make a condition that the 'vaisavi shakti' astra can only be used by just one time, and not many times? Because Karna demanded that astra as a substitute for kawach kundal, for which Indra denied first, but after insisting by Karna, Indra put forth his conditions of using that astra only one time. A. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, why did Lord Indra gave his 'vaisavi shakti' astra to Karna? If Indra already knew that Karna would use that 'vaisavi shakti' to kill Arjuna, then Indra would be the most STUPIDEST father in the entire Dwapar Yuga, who in spite of saving his son, giving the power to his son's enemy. Obviously it was NOT any 'aashirvaad' by Indra. Karna Fans & TV shows: •Indra ask Karna to give his kawach kundal as a donation. •Karna gave those kawach kundal to Indra. •Indra impressed and by his own wish gave Karna - vaisavi shakti. "How stupid Indra was - to give a deadly weapon so that Karna would kill his son Arjuna." - Sarcastically speaking Here's how it happened: •Indra ask Karna to give his kawach kundal as a donation. •Karna rejected first, and then ask for a favor in return - vaisavi shakti. •Indra rejected that offer first - he knew Karna would use that weapon against Arjuna. •Karna also refused to donate his kawach kundal to Indra. •Indra then make a deal to use that vaisavi shakti astra only one time, after that it will return to Indra. •Karna agreed to that deal and gave his kawach kundal to Indra. B. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, why didn't Lord Indra gave those kawach kundal to Arjuna afterwards? - it's because Indra wasn't worried about his son Arjuna, he just wanted to remove those protection from Karna, so that Karna would die. "Indra dev ko iss baat ki chinta nahin thi ki Arjuna ko kaise bachayenge, balki iss baat ki chinta thi ki karna ko kaise maarenge, Indra dev ko Arjuna ki shakti aur saamarthya pe pura bharosa hai" C. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, Didn't Lord Indra gave any counter weapon of vaisavi shakti to Arjuna? Yes he did. Indra gave Arjuna his most powerful weapons - Vajra and Aindrastra. Vaisavi shakti could kill only one person but Vajra could kill thousands of demons at a time. ----------------------------------------------- Even with the 'Vaishvi shakti' weapon of Karna, he couldn't able to kill Arjuna as Arjuna had the knowledge of Lord Shiva's weapons which could easily nullify the effects of 'Vaishvi shakti' weapon.(It is stupid to think that Indra's weapons are stronger than Lord Shiva's weapons) •Raudrastra : This weapon was used by Arjuna to kill fourteen thousand kalakeya demons. •Pashupatastra : Lord Shiva granted this weapon to Arjuna after testing his valour. This is the most powerful weapon of Shiva. Invoking Pashupatastra is highly against the warfare as it is capable of destroying the universe. Arjuna never used it. •Maheshwarastra : It is said to contain the power of Lord Shiva's third eye and it's capable of killing immortal gods. Arjuna also had the knowledge of Pashupatastra of lower version which he received from Indra. ---------------------------------------------------------- If Arjuna has to CHEAT, to kill Karna, he would have done it much earlier and with ease. As Arjuna had ‘Sammohan Astra', - which makes the enemy to either sit on the chariots, leaving all his weapons keep aside, or hallucinated or fainted. After that Arjuna can kill the enemy easily. He could use that weapon in Mahabharata war, to kill all his opponents easily, but he didn't, as it's an unfair means to fight a war. In Virat yuddh, he used this weapon merely to stop fight. He didn't kill any big warrior afterward - like Bheeshma, Drona, Kripa, Karan, Ashwatthama, Duryodhan etc. He could have killed Karna there and then. And if you say that Karna had kawach kundal, he won't die, then Arjuna could have forcefully taken his kawach kundal from his body, as Karna was hallucinated or fainted. But instead, Arjuna spared all those lives, including the life of Duryodhan and Dusshasana, which showed Arjuna always stood by the side of Dharma and Truth. --------------------------------------- I wonder how anybody got a boon as kawach kundal since birth. It's obvious that those kawach kundal belong to the Indra loka. So how did Karna got it since birth? Because everyone else in all the 4 yugas, who got some kind of boon either by doing some hard penance to the Gods, or some good deeds. So How did Karna got Kawach kundal since birth? It means he was extremely lucky to get it free of cost, OR he did a penance to the Lord Surya on his previous life when he was a deamon named Sahasrakavacha, who got 1000 Kawach kundal, out of which 999 were destroyed by Nara and Narayan (Arjuna and Krishna).

[@Vikram_jha-hj1up]

Well defined and thank you for good information ❤🎉

[@Red-Hood12]

@@Vikram_jha-hj1up 👍

[@hiranmaiP]

@poorimail8292

[@Movie_Wibe.]

And this time when Surya Dev come and said to karna Indra dev is coming to take your kavach kundal . So don't give you and that movement karna if kavach kundal is not still I defeat Arjun because my I learn from Guru Dron and parashuram.. and still people said Dronacharya never tech karna

[@jatinbisht6728]

Bhai iska answer toh abhi bhi ni dia tune ki indra aaya hi kyu karn k kawach lene

[@nawabkhan9412]

Bhai yeh toh socho ki jaha shree krishan rehnte honge jin logo ne unhe dekha hogaa woh kitneeee khushnaseeb hogeee

[@niranjanchavan2325]

It is not possible in Kalyug. Shri Krishna was there in Dvapar Yug

[@Ahsankhan-cc9ie]

​@@niranjanchavan2325 bhai main pakistan se hun aur mujy hindusim bohat acha lagta hai . kiya ap mujy hindusim ke bare btaaa sakty hai ?

[@TheInfinteHub]

​@Ahsankhan-cc9ie bhai hinduism ke baare mein koi kuch nahi Bata sakta yeh bohot jyada deep hai agar aap aur main apni puri zindagi bhi laga denge toh bhi sab kuch nahi jaan pyenge aap koh jis cheez ki zaroorat hai woh janlo aur chordo, like agar peace of mind aur self knowledge chaiye toh upnishad padlo aur agar kisi aur field ki knowledge chahiye toh usse related scriptures padhlo,love from India🙏❤️🇮🇳

[@leaderstalking5339]

Karn nhi Jeet saka aur bhag gye, us waqt ye mahashay wahi the Karn apna chappal chhod ke bhaga tha ye mahashay chappal leke Karn ke piche piche bhaga 😂😂

[@bksstudypoint4680]

Ha star plus kid jo thahare

[@Red-Hood12]

Karna ke peeche Arjuna lath le ke bhaagaa thaa......Arjuna ne Karna se kaha, bhaag komdhike Aandhi aayi....😆😆😆😆

[@thethreespikes9737]

Kbhi source text k baare m suna h?

[@leaderstalking5339]

@@thethreespikes9737 kisi ne nhi suna bs tu hi suna h aur sirf sun ke hi suna rha to no words for you just r.i.p. aur padha v h to book ka naam writer ka naam page no bta de

[@Reehesemxrop]

I know Arjun was the great warrior or unke jaisa koi ho hi nahi sakta 😊

[@akshaysamel8972]

16:08 Retreat is a tactical withdrawal to save resources, regroup, or avoid greater harm, while running away implies a fearful, unplanned escape. Karna, throughout the Mahabharata, may retreat in certain situations due to overwhelming circumstances, but he does not "run away" in a cowardly sense. His character is that of a determined and loyal warrior who faces challenges head-on, even if that involves momentarily retreating for strategic reasons.

[@surajitmog1021]

Sirf ye banda sach jantahe... Or aj tak jitna v gita... Mahabharat... Me likha he woh sab jhut.... I love karna and no one can change my opinion❤❤

[@parmarvipul5166]

ek bar Jake padh bhi le 😂

[@surajitmog1021]

@@parmarvipul5166 pehle ap ... Pariye

[@harshittripathi7493]

​@@parmarvipul5166rehn de bhai uska opinion badal jaayega Sach sunne ka gooda nhi uski gaand me😅

[@sujeetsrivastava8469]

Ye to achi baat h aapka opinion badle bhi n main bhi yahi chahta hu, tabhi to ghor kalyug aayega jb adarmiyon ko idol bnaya jayega. Main to chahta hu log karn or ravan ko aur pyar karein taki adharm badhe kalyug badhe or sabka vinaash ho. Ye bhi jruri h

[@Jaimaibhawani]

Agar tune mahabharat pari hai tu tune ye nhi pra kya ki karn ko bheem ne 3- 4 bar buri tareeke se hraya tha​@@surajitmog1021

[@magnum9750]

As you can see the pet dogs of Sonyputra Corona has started barking and defending their father as expected 😂

[@alinshikder3860]

Or tu kon hea ohh pehechan gaya. Sirf name ke sanatani and a starplus putra arjun fan

[@sripadkulkarni]

Bhai Karna is not Salman Khan that you can call names. All characters in Mahabharata including Shakuni teach us something, just because somebody is trying hard to make a hero out of Karna doesn’t give you rights to abuse him and put yourself in badlight. Hare Krishna 🙏🏼😊

[@b8bb8r]

Karn ne yudh se palayan kiya? Shri krishna ne bhi kiya tha. Unhein bhi bologe? Arjun bahut veer tha. Nihathe karn ko maara. Ye veerta hai 👌🏼

[@b8bb8r]

@nishantrana3994 हाँ तो कर्ण विष्णु अवतार नहीं था। तेरे मेरे जैसा था। लड़ाई में बहुत कुछ होता है। याँ तो सबको भगौड़ा कहो। याँ सबको वही सम्मान दो। ये क्या बात की एक भाग गया एक ने लीला करी। श्री कृष्ण ने सदा आम आदमी जैसा व्यवहार किया। कालयवन को मारना था तो वे ले गए।

[@Paradox17AB]

​@@b8bb8r agar karn tere mere jesa hai toh bhagwan se kyu compare kr rha , aukat meh rahe , adharmi ko bhagwan se compare kr rha lol.

[@b8bb8r]

@@Paradox17AB औक़ात? जिस भगवान की तू बात कर रहा है, उन्हीं ने कर्ण को अर्जुन से अधिक माना था। टीवी सीरियल में मत देखना, महाभारत में पढ़ना। अधर्मी नहीं था वो कृतज्ञ था। आजकल वालों जैसा नहीं कि लाभ मिले तो बाप बदल लें मित्र क्या बड़ी चीज़ है।

[@Paradox17AB]

@@b8bb8r arey bas kr , karn ka chamcha

[@chandrikasahani5943]

Ebein hi karn ko hero banadetehe I always knew draupadi never goes wrong, because she is krishna🙏🕉❤

[@nitindange7569]

🙏☺️ She is Krishna Bhakt,Dharm gyani (dnyani)

[@stranger8893]

​@@nitindange7569she is also krishna There are three characters in Mahabharata whose name was krishna First is lord himself lord Krishna 2nd is arjun who is also known as krishna 3rd is draupadi All three are called krishna many times in Mahabharata

[@nitindange7569]

@strager ji 🙏☺️ Dhanyawad 👍

[@stranger8893]

@@nitindange7569 🙏🙏

[@chandrikasahani5943]

@@nitindange7569 are bhai krishn ji behen he Isiliye droupadi ji ka ek naam krishna he, mene krishn thodi bola

[@chetanmetkar7024]

The problem is that this person sitting in the studio is telling wrong things about Karna, the best warrior of Mahabharata, in reality Karna was a very great personality.Karna is not a villain, he knew that he had chosen the wrong side for the Mahabharata war.

[@stranger8893]

Which Mahabharata do u read

[@soulflower2021]

Abe chaddi Mahabharat Padi Hai Kya ? Ullo ka patha

[@BAADSHA-z6k]

Serial thoda kam dekha karo

[@avishek5857]

sony se mahabharat mat dekha karo

[@mikazogaming1084]

Mahabharat karna never ran away from arjuna. He had the kavach and no one could defeat him and when he had no kavach arjuna killed him by deceit when he was lifting his carriage wheel. He was the most powerful and the best.

[@धनञ्जयकुलकर्णी]

Karn was engulfed in jealousy. He was an opportunist. His only intention of being with Duryodhan was to stand against Arjun (indeed the greatest archer), defeat him and earn the title of being the best archer of all times. He was infected with an inferiority complex and always thought of overcoming it by defeating someone greater in prowess. He was not a warrior, he was definitely not brave.

[@ringostarr1038]

not in original mahabharatha, but only in your fantasies.

[@tusharranjan1054]

​@@ringostarr1038first you need to read original mb before telling others.

[@धनञ्जयकुलकर्णी]

@@ringostarr1038 The Writing is On The Wall Brother.. don't have to be an expert.

[@ringostarr1038]

@@tusharranjan1054 o.o stop tryin to fib, no one except zoomers believe you can change reality because you believe. Boi, Krishna had to teach something & Bhisma, Drona & Karna were arche types to show how good people support Adharma. Something which you foos o.o forgot lol

[@octawraith7539]

Arjuna was more jealous person

[@satyamstudiobegusarai2653]

Aaj Kal Jisko dekho Sanatan Par Gyan Batne Chala Aata Hai Jinka Khud Ka Gyan Hai Hi Nahi News Chanal Ki Trah Kisi Ko Bula Kar Debet Suru Kar Deta HAi

[@gigachad9898]

No matter what people say if Shree Hari himself praised Karn and had a respect for him that means he truly deserved everyone's respect

[@xxtoxicxx5139]

Hari na to duryodhana ko bhi praise Kiya h

[@gigachad9898]

@@xxtoxicxx5139 Duryodhan ko sarcastically praise kiya hai lekin Karn ko sach mein kiya tha

[@xxtoxicxx5139]

@@gigachad9898 Virat yudh mai kisna pura kauravo ko haraya tha

[@gigachad9898]

@@xxtoxicxx5139 mai yeh nahi keh raha ki Karn hi sarwashrest tha wahi sabse mahan tha mai bas yeh keh raha hu ki Karn nafrat karne layak bhi nahi tha. Aur yeh bachcho ki tarah yeh mahan ki kam mahan yeh sab karke koi fayeda nahi Karn ko aise hi danveer Karn nahi kaha jaata aur haan mai yeh bhi janta hu ki Pandavo ke pass dharm tha nahi toh Shree Krishna unki orr se kyu the

[@xxtoxicxx5139]

@@gigachad9898 vo ha kisi Stree ko vaishya khana koi accha gun nahi h

[@debanganasarkarsengupta8009]

Mahabharata is that one epic which shows every character falling ultimately prey to their own flaws. Each and every character is responsible for his or her doom

[@shubh_chandrakar9334]

Its reality not epic or story

[@akshaysamel8972]

15:26 While the incident of Karna and Duryodhana trying to create difficulty for the Pandavas during their exile is present, the claim that Karna "ran away" from the Gandharvas is a misinterpretation. He did retreat from the situation after the Gandharvas proved too powerful, but this should not be seen as Karna "fleeing" from battle in a cowardly sense. It was a moment of strategic retreat in the face of overwhelming strength. The primary *Mahabharata* text does not depict Karna as a coward or someone who frequently runs away from battle.

[@dhiralbhatt916]

People should not trust on only this type of human’s story. As I found every other person just came and trying to portrait KARAN as a villain.so please Just go and read original Mahabharata written by ved vyasji. If you want know true story about any character of Mahabharata.

[@rudra3354]

Wo padh k hi aye hain yahan😂

[@Indiantiger000]

Orr tu Ekta kapoor ka fan karn ko baap maankar baitha hai.

[@tonguewarrior5020]

KARN was a Villain and as evil as Duryodhan

[@Jaimaibhawani]

Parr le bhai tu bhi jake😂😂

[@vsmart9]

MISLEADING VIEWS - If Karna was evil then why would he donate his kavach and kundal? If Karna was evil then why would he reject the offer of Krsna of being crowned the King of World? If Karna was evil then why would he battle on the loosing side despite knowing the consequence? If Karna was evil then why would he let go other pandavas and let them despite having the chance to kill them?

[@divyapatil2420]

You must donated brain 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@vsmart9]

@divyapatil2420 Don't attack me personally. Be fair and objectively answer my questions.

[@divyapatil2420]

@@vsmart9 your questions doesn't make any sense, If you want ans then go and listen to podcast or read vee vyas mahabharat And still you don't get your ans then you are truly an brainless person who just want controversies

[@vsmart9]

@@divyapatil2420 I have read everything multiple times from authentic sources much better than this Ami Gantra. And therefore you need to give objective and logical answers don't do hasty generalisations because that only shows your lack of understanding and your bias. Daanveer Karna commited sins but that does not mean he is evil. He realised and repeneted for his sins and subsequently paid the price for it.

[@divyapatil2420]

@vsmart9 And after reading it multiple times you still have doubts?? It's impossible to read mahabharat multiple times It's not episode that you watch multiple times !! 🤣🤣 And if you don't get it then it's not for you!! Bhagwan ne bhi bhagwat gita Arjun ko batayi thi , brainless and darpok karn ko nahi !! So it's not for everyone to be true !! So move on !! Or go cry about your questions !! Aur bura lag raha ho toh thodi der sonyputra dekha lo !! Wahi se gyan liya hai na !!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@chrisnendu]

20:00 for Those who came from reel

[@good114]

1. bhai, saree traditional culture hain, phele aurate ekavastra phenti thi 2. if y consider virat war, tb arjun ne khha tha ki unse ghandiv 65 saal pheli milli hain, uss hisab se abhimanyu 65+ years hona chaiye, but dikhaya jata hain 16 3. droupadi ke sirph 1 patti tha [yudhisthir] but stories ne usse paach patti bnna diya😭 , aur thi to mata kunti ne bhi dropadi ko whhi khha tha jo karn ne khha tha 4. krishn ne karn ko vrish khha tha, vrish mtlb dharmatma 5. karn ko nhhi ptta tha ti ashwasen uske dhanush mein baitha hain, uska apna arjun se pratishod tha 6. arjun subhadra ka koi love angle ye sb nhhi tha, usne jbardasti usse uthaya tha, tb krishn ne bhi arjun ko bola tha ki ye glt hain

[@TheJigyasu]

Abhinav Agarwal scholar on mahabharat 8:57 - prove the draupadi never say andhe ka putra andha and draupadi ne karna ko suta putra kaha kar reject kiya 12:30 - critical apparatus and the other shlokas 14:30 - karna ne kiya yuddha se palayan 17:30 - karna in virat yuddha and he was a grey character 18:49 - mahabharat ki katha ki suruvat 24:00 - scholars on mahabharat 27:25 - meri mahabharat me kudh likhunga - distortion of the epic 29:55 - mahabharat ke kayi addition me dikkat 37:15 - fiction on mahabharat

[@Samurai-xj9kf]

जिसके बाण ने कृष्णा और बजरंग का रथ को दो कदम पीछे धकेल दिया था जिसने अपना कवच कुंडल दान में दे दिया पांच पांडवों की जान भीख मे दे दिया वो करण भागे गए 😂😂

[@dheerndrasingh9052]

Ye dekho ekta kapoor ka product 😂😂😂😂

[@Mr1tyunjay]

Ye jo tune bola hai ye kahi bhi Mahabharat me nhi likha . Tony putra corona fan 🙈😭

[@Samurai-xj9kf]

@@Mr1tyunjay are bkl germen syphed Wale Jake phle Geeta pd

[@deepush316]

​@@Samurai-xj9kfpehle tu padh Jaa ke

[@Biotech_is_life]

​Vedvyas ki mahabharat me Geeta aati hai , uncle between ye sab original mahabharat book me nahi hai ?🤡?​@@Samurai-xj9kf

[@Savitri-xj3gv]

I have read 5 books on mahabharat and in every one book karna was a great warrior and usne lakshya bhed kar dia tha

[@itsgamingtime..7001]

What about BORI CE (English)? It was not mentioned that Karn shot his target.. In Gita Press Hindi mahabharat , at first it was written none of the prince could shot the target, but later it was talking that Karn took up the bow and Draupadi was saying , I will not marry him and so on. Which creates confusion about authenticity..

[@ayushkesharwani7814]

लगता है तुमने वो 5 बुक के लिस्ट में किसी आधुनिक वामपंथी के लिखे पुस्तक या कविताए पढ़ लिए 😂😂 मुन्ना ऑथेंटिक पढ़ो! वो जो चारो दिशाओं में सदियों से चली आ रही स्क्रिप्ट को खोज कर 50 साल के रिसर्च में बनाया गया है। जो गीताप्रेस और भंडारकर है।

[@stranger8893]

Kon si 5 books pdhi thi name btana

[@itsgamingtime..7001]

@@stranger8893 he is misleading people..never read any book most probably

[@stranger8893]

@@itsgamingtime..7001 thats why i m asking her bcoz i can give proof from more than 5 different versions of Mahabharata where he failed to hit target in swaymwar

[@Exploring_motor]

अर्जुन सबसे श्रेष्ठ योद्धा था तत्काल समय का उसके सामने क्या कोई भी योद्धा टिक नहीं सकता था।दूसरी बात कृष्ण की परम कृपा पांडवो के ऊपर थी यही वजह थी कि महाभारत युद्ध में पांडवो विजय हुई.

[@user-cv7ln2do6b]

Karn is great ❤

[@jaydutta7711]

*@user-cv7ln2do6b* Karna doesn't exist anymore. He was great in doing Adharma, not in doing the right things. So there is nothing praiseworthy about Karna. Arjuna was the greatest character in the Mahabharata.

[@tenacity8281]

Karn adharmi tha, dharm pe hota toh Draupadi vastra haran kabhi hone nahi deta, ya toh mar jata ya Mita deta

[@Lavanasura]

Your mom is also great

[@manoja.g.-hf3xs]

Spiritual episodes are best category. But within Spiritual personages, try to discriminate between those give out book knowledge and those who have actually done Sadhana in caves or cremation grounds.

[@AwaaraMusaafir]

That’s a well put point although this is not really a spiritual episode technically speaking, this is a scripture/history based episode… where we are just trying to find out what really happened in Mahabharat. 😄

[@nayakmaaniya557]

अच्छा आप लोगों को हिंदी भी आती है😮

[@harekrishna2291]

Are a koi tere school college ke mangadant bakwas kitab nahi ha a sastra praman ha jo satya ha aur maharshi ved vyas dwara dekh ke likha gaya ha jo bhagwan Krishna ke hi sabd ha. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀

[@harekrishna2291]

​@@AwaaraMusaafirश्लोक 4.14 copy न मां कर्माणि लिम्पन्ति न मे कर्मफले स्पृहा । इति मां योऽभिजानाति कर्मभिर्न स बध्यते ॥ १४ ॥ शब्दार्थ न-कभी नहीं; माम्-मुझको; कर्माणि-सभी प्रकार के कर्म; लिम्पन्ति-प्रभावित करते हैं; न-नहीं; मे-मेरी; कर्म-फले-सकाम कर्म में; स्पृहा-महत्त्वाकांक्षा; इति-इस प्रकार; माम्-मुझको; य:-जो; अभिजानाति-जानता है; कर्मभि:-ऐसे कर्म के फल से; न-कभी नहीं; स:-वह; बध्यते-बँध पाता है ।. अनुवाद play_arrowpause मुझ पर किसी कर्म का प्रभाव नहीं पड़ता, न ही मैं कर्मफल की कामना करता हूँ। जो मेरे सम्बन्ध में इस सत्य को जानता है, वह भी कर्मों के फल के पाश में नहीं बँधता।

[@harekrishna2291]

​@@AwaaraMusaafir श्लोक 7.15 copy न मां दुष्कृतिनो मूढा: प्रपद्यन्ते नराधमा: । माययापहृतज्ञाना आसुरं भावमाश्रिता: ॥ १५ ॥ शब्दार्थ न-नहीं; माम्-मेरी; दुष्कृतिन:-दुष्ट; मूढा:-मूर्ख; प्रपद्यन्ते-शरण ग्रहण करते हैं; नर-अधमा:-मनुष्यों में अधम; मायया-माया के द्वारा; अपहृत-चुराये गये; ज्ञाना:-ज्ञान वाले; आसुरम्-आसुरी; भावम्-प्रकृति या स्वभाव को; आश्रिता:-स्वीकार किये हुए ।. अनुवाद play_arrowpause जो निपट मूर्ख हैं, जो मनुष्यों में अधम हैं, जिनका ज्ञान माया द्वारा हर लिया गया है तथा जो असुरों की नास्तिक प्रकृति को धारण करने वाले हैं, ऐसे दुष्ट मेरी शरण ग्रहण नहीं करते।

[@xabhinavkumar108]

Arjun the greatest warrior❤❤❤

[@extrashorts6981]

💯 shi

[@Monojdas541]

Right

[@jkvlogs8896]

Noooo....

[@harikaraorao7514]

Who Were the Sutas? The narrator of the Mahābhārata as we know it is Rishi Ugrashravā Sauti. He was the son of Rishi Lomaharshan and belonged to the Suta community. Hence, the appellation ‘Sauti’. The community was considered a ‘mixed jāti’8 of offsprings of a Brāhmin mother and Kshatriya father. Sutas were considered expert sārthis9 . The role of the charioteer was significant in ancient India. Charioteers were usually those who were close friends and confidants of the person they worked with. Their role became even more important in a war. They were to not just steer the chariot but also ensure the warrior they were driving stayed safe and motivated. They acted as guides in the war. The importance of a charioteer becomes evident from the fact that Arjuna asked Krishna to be his charioteer. To match Krishna, Karna asked Shalya, the old king of Madra, to drive his chariot. In addition, Sutas were engaged as storytellers, history keepers and ministers in royal courts. Many were also warriors and commanders. Famous Sutas in the Mahābhārata are: 1. Sanjay, the narrator of the Bhagavad Gitā and the Kurukshetra war to Dhritarāshtra. He played the role of charioteer, friend, trusted messenger and mentor to Dhritarāshtra. 2. Sudeshnā, the queen of King Virāta of Matsya desh,Uttarā’s mother and Abhimanyu’s mother-in-law. She was the maternal grandmother of Parikshita. 3. Keechak, the commander of King Virāta of Matsya desh. He was the brother of Sudeshnā and amongst the most powerful men in Matsya. 4. Karna, though born to Kunti, was raised in a Suta family of Adhiratha and Rādhā. He married women from the Suta community and his children were brought up as Sutas. Duryodhana crowned him the King of Anga desh. A great warrior, he was the commander of the Kaurava army after the death of Dronāchārya. Not only Karna but the sons of his foster parents were also trained warriors. They had participated in the Mahābhārata war on the side of the Kauravas. 5. Rishi Bandi, a great sage whose story is narrated in the Vana Parva of the Mahābhārata. In the Rāmāyana, one of the closest confidants and an important minister of King Dashratha of Ayodhyā is Sumantra, who belonged to the Suta community.

[@EknathChakraborty]

Excellent informative discussion, i appreciate

[@saiswaroopaiyer]

Wonderful interaction 😊. Loved the book but thse conversation ignite a deeper thought process that enriches our next round of reading the Mahabharata.

[@chaitanyakolukuluri5100]

Feels good supporting this channel!

[@harikaraorao7514]

Suta's refers to : From a Kshatriya by the daughter of a Brahmana is born (a son called) according to his varna a Suta The profession of a Suta is : To Sutas (belongs) the management of horses and of chariots Suta’s were charioteers but they were also bards (poets) and raconteurs (storytellers). Suta’s does not belongs to a lower varna. They were neither Vaishya nor Shudra. They were generally Kshatriyas but due to intermixture of varna, they became Sutas. This is what Karna said to Parshurama about himself : ‘“Rama angrily spoke these words to Karna. ‘O foolish one! No one who has been born as a brahmana can endure such great suffering. Your patience is like that of a kshatriya. I wish to hear the truth.’ Karna was frightened of being cursed. He sought his favours and said, ‘O Bhargava! Know me to be between a brahmana and a kshatriya, born as a suta. People on earth speak of me as Radheya Karna. Therefore, Sutaputra or son of Suta can mean son of a Charioteer or son of a bard or son of a raconteur. Sanjaya and Karna were Suta or son of Suta. Karna was called as a son of Suta because Adhiratha was a charioteer. Karna called his own charioteer as son of Suta or Sutaputra. Also one thing, Adhiratha was the descendent of Yayati, a Kshatriya of the Lunar Dynasty. So Adhiratha can also be called as a Kshatriya of lunar dynasty but due to intermixture of Varna Adhiratha became a suta. Source : BORI CE Mahabharata

[@Onetakeshort]

Uncle karna ke bare main kuch bura maat bolna achi baat nehi hai sir ❤ legend hai karna

[@ManishSharma-tc2ue]

history does not care about your feelings son

[@DevDev-h4e]

Ye bosdi wale hai inhe samjhana bekaar hai😅😂 ye itihaas garntho se badkar tv serial ko mante hai😅​@@ManishSharma-tc2ue

[@Red-Hood12]

Oh mere munna, apni aankhe khol ree.😂😂

[@Kumar-u6o4t]

जिसनें अपनी कवच कुंडल दान कर दिया कुंती अपनी माँ और पांडव उसकी भाई ये जानने के वाबजूद भी जिसे दुर्योधन का साथ नहीं छोड़ा कृष्ण भगवान है ये बात कर्ण को पता था फिर भी उसने युद्ध करना नहीं छोड़ा और तुम लोग कह रहे हो की गंधर्ब के सामने अपनी मित्र को संकट में छोड़ कर कर्ण भाग गया था 🤦‍♀️

[@everythingishere6646]

But this is true bro karna is defeated by gandharva

[@AryanRaj-hi9wz]

Plz Mahabharata me likha h karna ne ladkia v offer ki thi ar jb tk kawch k badle kuch na Miley tb tk kawach nhi Diya tha mahabhart padho❤

[@Kumar-u6o4t]

@@AryanRaj-hi9wz महाभारत में लिखने से कुछ नहीं होता रहस्य को समझो महाभारत तो ये भी लिखा है की बर्बरिक जल्दी हीं युद्ध खत्म कर देता जबकि वो बकवास था भीष्म , अश्वथमा, जयद्रथ जैसे महाबली की वरदानी शक्ति को झूठा बना कर क्या बर्बरिक युद्ध खत्म कर देता Logic को समझो लिखने से कुछ नहीं होता

[@nivakalita5697]

If you don't believe, you can read authentic Mahabharat written by Vedvyas.

[@SatnamMahal-n3f]

Karna ❤❤

[@MmMahfuz-rs4lr]

Ahankari tah

[@AmolparavePatil]

1)Karn bhaga nahi tha,2) Karn ne sadharan dhanushya dharan Kiya tha, balki Vijay dhanushya bhi use kar sakta tha,3) Jo gandharv tha chitrasen nam ka 1:23 har Raha tha kyu ki kavach aur kundal ke karan Karn ko marna asambhav tha, isliye achanak se kapat yojana banai aur apni puri sena ko kaha ki yah hastinapur ka Karn hai kavach kundal dhari ise koi nahi mar sakta isliye sab milkar ise jakad lo achanak yah sunkar Karn ko jana pada tha

[@shibayandey2399]

कर्ण 🔥🦁🦁

[@amitrohit6053]

lolz this 😅 this is why he dont want to reveal any further b'coz if he did to

[@orionstar2945]

महाभारत युद्ध का नं 1 भगोड़ा । उसे भगोड़ा बोलने वालों में भीम, सात्यकि और धृष्टद्युम्न का नाम भी है, और इन सब से सोनीपुत्र हारा था , हारकर भागा भी था । 😂😂😂

[@shibayandey2399]

@@orionstar2945 हां सायेद तेरा सपनो मे 🤡

[@shibayandey2399]

@@orionstar2945मुर्ख जिस जराशन को हराने मे 14 दिन लग गया था भीम को उसको कर्ण ने 1 दिन मे ही हरा दिया था कुछ तो दिमाग use करो

[@orionstar2945]

@@shibayandey2399 वेद व्यासजी रचित महाभारत पढ़ के आ , सोनीपुत्र फैन

[@ringostarr1038]

IF KARNA WAS TRULY A VILLAIN, HE WOULD HAVE TAKEN THE OFFER KRISHNA GAVE TO HIM - Krishna told him, he was the eldest Pandava & if he switched sides, he would be made the emperor instead of Yudhistra & also would marry Draupadhi as the eldest Pandava. Karna rejected this, showing he was a man of character & how even good people support adharma, due to their goodness.

[@shwetapathak2239]

He realised his sins in the end and that doesn't make him good anyway. Dumb people like you have no sense of judgement

[@Red-Hood12]

What a STUPID LOGIC you have: Nah!! Not at all. No, Karna had no dilemma at all regarding friendship. He would always choose Duryodhan over Krishna, as he already did. Denying Krishna was not a hard choice for him, as he was already a KING. Well it's easy for Karna to reject Krishna’s offers, as he was already a KING of Anga Desh. Besides that, Duryodhan, his besties, has biggest Empires, including Pandavas’s Indraprastha. So there is not much left to gain if he choose Pandavas side. Pandavas didn't have their own kingdom to live. Also, if Kauravas would have won the Mahabharata war, everything else would be under Prince Duryodhan’s empire. So, for KING Karna it wasn't a good deal, he won't sacrifice all those luxuries just for the sake of 'Dharma'. Also, he didn't consider Krishna as a Supreme God, but more as a Pandavas’s mentor. It's easy for him to choose the side of luxury lifestyle, which he already had, than the side of Dharma and Truth. In terms of moral ethics and virtues, any kind of friendship cannot be considered as greater than Dharma and truth. Krishna-Arjun friendship teaches us the true value of dharma - how to live one's life in a fair manner towards the path of Dharma. Whereas Karna- Duryodhan friendship was the usual, normal friendship, which DOESN'T TEACH ANYTHING. If Karna accepted Duryodhan's friendship, it was his choice, if he was in a dilemma that means he had no clarity and wisdom regarding dharma. Duryodhan made Karna a King, there was no sacrifice. Whereas Arjun rejected Krishna's Narayani Sena for Krishna - True friendship. Dharma is always greater than any friendship.

[@ringostarr1038]

@@Red-Hood12 o.o Like I said, u r a fine SPECIMEN. Your zoomr world is not the same as real world, come bac brihenlala lova

[@ringostarr1038]

@@Red-Hood12 o.o we know your heart is with BRIHENLALA. You are fida, but let's get back to facts. Since Mahabharatha is actually deep, not like your family story. Stop trying to put your ORDINARY MANUSH spin to this deep saga. o.o We have no time for ur excremnt

[@ringostarr1038]

@@Red-Hood12 Karna-Duryodhana friendship TEACHES intelligent people, NOT o.o foos like u. This is your problem, not ours. There is no cure for ur low intellect. Duryodhana helped Karna when no one else did. But the way Karna had to return it was by shepherding Duryodhana in the right path. At least, he could have saved his life by NOT supporting him in war. This is what Mahabharatha teaches via Karna-Duryodhana saga. o.o what we learnt from this? You people can only learn if we bring our SLIPPER into equation. It is what u are

[@Therock77178]

First of all karna himself one of the kontaye and elder brother, student of bhagwaan parshuram. If all pandavs are strong then he too so powerful💪. Secondly Chalo maan b le ki karna kaye bar hara hi to aise to krishna bhagwaan ne b arjun ko 2-3 bar karna se bachaya hi. Agar karan itna strong ni tha to ye to sab mante he haina ki uska kavach kundal liya gya and dhoke se mara gya. Agar strong ni tha to kavach kundal and dhoke se marne ki jarurut he kyo pade? Ispar to koi yakeet he ni krega yes aap keh skte ho just like any two powerful teams or player's sometimes some battles can be won or loose by someone it's doesn't means ki wo kam powerful hi . And last don't forget that karn not use his vijay dhanush in all battles he used it only in main mahabharat battlefield on the other hand arjun always use his gandiv.

[@hotandspicy-i6m]

Vadan aur shrap naam ki bhi koi cheez hoti hai bhai,karn ko yuhi nahi mara usne apni jeevan mein bohut sara pap kiya tha isliye usko aisi maut mili,aur rahi baat vijaya dhanush ki toh karn anth tak vijaya dhanush ke sath hi ladh rha tha,marne se pehle bhi uske haat mein Vijaya dhanush hi tha

[@kirtisagar6821]

Arjun ne karn kya bigada tha? Woh koi daridri ghar mein nahi pala badha. woh Arjun dweshi tha woh ekmatra vyakti hai jisne drupadi ko vyesaha kaha. Woh yudha chahata tha.Apne dil per haath rakh kar sochiye arjun ko pata chalta ki karn uska bhai hai toh? Karn khalanayak hai, Abhimanyue ko mars woh chal gaya kya? Karn and dhritarashtra was responsinble for yudha.karn yudh rok sakta tha par arjun ko harana iss ekhi udeshya ke liye itna narsanhar hone diya, apne ahankar ke liye kul ka naash kiya.Aap kya bhagwan ko galat mante hai kya? Karn shuru se hi galat hi tha. Writers ne uska avadambar machaya hai, vyasji ka nazaria alag hai.

[@prathmeshmore1938]

Dekh bhai krishn jo ki bhagwan the unone Arjun ko Chuna dharm ke sthapna keley agar krishna ne usko Chuna to obviously wo humans me greatest hoga Arjun nar hai and krishna Narayan.. that's it

[@thebeliever5276]

He's cheater, liar, bhagoda..... arjun had very Astra from devta by doing penance unlike liar karna. And about कवच, kundal 😂😂😂 he already knew about it 😂 coz his father surya dev told him😂😂😂 and uske saath koi chal nai hua tha uske badle Mai usne bhi indrastra manga tha😂😂 agar itna hi strong tha toh gandharvo se kyu BHAGA😂😂 AUR HAAN "KARNA IS THE ONE WHO TOLD DUSHASAN TO TAKE OFF DRAUPADI'S CLOTHES 😂"😂 even told her beshya. What a great man 😢

[@thebeliever5276]

​@@prathmeshmore1938 bhai arjun ko sab like karte hai not because he's nar because he listens. Usne apna adhe se jyada Jeevan van Mai bitaya hai.sabka samman karta hai unlike karna who's always jealous and furious 😂

[@Enthusiast563]

Raja Parikshit ka ego nahin tha. Is 7 din mein unhone Srimad Bhagvat puran ka sravan kiya tha. Wo bhi Suk muni ji se jo ki apne janm ke turant baad hi adrishya ho gaye the. Us samay yeh bohot badi ghatna thi. Phir apne karm ke phal se mila abhisaap ko accept karna ek satyabadi raja ka dharm bhi hota hai. Isiliye woh mahan hain. Phir unko moksh mila. Agar deha tyagne se pehle unka ego rehta toh moksh milna asambhav tha.

[@RutwikKawade]

Is chaccha ki bato se ghanta farak nhi padne wala karna tab bhi king tha aur aaj bhi hai aur hamesha wahi hero rahega ❤😊

[@amitrohit6053]

lol tere aise comment karne se Karna ko bhi ganta farak nahi padne vala

[@RutwikKawade]

@@amitrohit6053 phir tumko kyu farak pada reply dene ke liye 😂

[@amitrohit6053]

@@RutwikKawade maza aata hai tum jaise logo ko chedne me, jinko jab sach ka aaina dikha do to vo log kuch bhi nahi bol sakte

[@RutwikKawade]

@@amitrohit6053 kaunsa sach bhai bhram me tum ji rahe ho chakke arjun ko hero maankar jo without krishna mamuli sainik ko bhi nhi maar sakta

[@kavyagupta7101]

Mtlb rehna toh bewakoof hi h. Saath dena toh galat ka hi h😂😂 Karan ko sai maan ne vale logo ke saath problem bhi uske jesi hi h khud ko glt maan na hi nhi h.

[@LakshmeeshamUdupi]

9.30 super. Karn ke barey main sahi kaha Droupadi is heroine

[@rajeevsoni9109]

Aaj kal सोशल मीडिया पर बहुत सारे ved vayas,Tulsi dass पैदा हो गए है।हर कोई ज्ञान देने लगा है।

[@akshaysamel8972]

8:12 In Vyasa's original composition, the incident where Duryodhana falls into the water and Draupadi mocks him is mentioned in the Vana Parva (Book of the Forest). This event is also mentioned in critical edition compiled by the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

[@tonguewarrior5020]

*According to TV serials* "KARN was the greatest warrior and killed in unfair way by Arjun 😂 *But according to Mahabharat scripture* "KARN was as evil as Duryodhan and killed by Arjun in fair battle"

[@akhil_Khatrii]

Oh really kid... Arjun fan boy😂

[@NAYANJYOTI9988]

Mfff fair battle.... Jishka baap ne karn se kabash kundal sin liya or nihotha ko baan mara, ismein konsa fair hein..

[@vibekpradhan3494]

​@@NAYANJYOTI9988karn bhi mara tha abhimanyu ko wese....tit for tat

[@vibekpradhan3494]

​@@akhil_Khatriioh really corona fan boy

[@Kio-b9r]

​@@vibekpradhan3494sahi kaha lekin yaha karn aur Arjun ki baath chal rahi h tho abhimanyu kaha se agaya bich m ... aur karn tho adharmi tha hi lekin merko samjh nhi atha ye Arjun ke piche itne pagal kyo h jo vyakti apni patni ki raksha na kare aur waha mojud hokar bhi shant rahe usko log pasand kar rahe waah

[@bidur4469]

Vagawan Krishna saved dharma, however, Karna fulfilled his duties and responsibilities honestly. That's why Vagawan Krishna was always happy about his struggles and daan. Destiny favors the dharma. So, Arjun lived and Karna took all the evils and sins along with the Kaurab brothers and Adharma sides by accepting death (badh). Therefore, we cannot compare God (Vagawan Krishna) with God's child (Karna). Whoever agrees with my concept please hit like...Thank you.

[@swapnilmishra3537]

Only in tv serials in reality Krishna ji ne karn vadh se phle kya bola h uske liy pdh le jake ek bar

[@Tejashwirana]

Vyash didn't write Mahabharat, Vyash is the story teller and Ganesh ji wrote Mahabharat.

[@HarinandS-t9c]

true...bhai ek doubt, ganesh ji wrote 8800 verse right..then 24000 came from where

[@madhumenong]

@@HarinandS-t9c You speak as if you were sitting next to Ganesh ji and counting.

[@whysoserious1023]

​@@HarinandS-t9c jo log aage story ko likhte gaye unhone apna version bhi daal diya original book name is Jay samhita later changed it in Mahabharat .

[@anoop61284]

​@@whysoserious1023no mahabharata was always 1 lac shloka. 8800 are kut shlokas not the original shloka

[@akshaysamel8972]

9:13 The event where Draupadi insults Karna by saying she will not marry a "Sutaputra" (son of a charioteer) is indeed mentioned in the Mahabharata by Vedavyasa and it is part of the Adiparva (the Book of the Beginning) This event is also mentioned in critical edition compiled by the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

[@nitinpatole8453]

Karn ❤❤

[@mukeshshukla5434]

कर्ण ऐक महान योद्धा ही नही अपितु महा दानी भी था बस उसकी कमी या जो मजबूरी थी उसको अधर्म का साथ देना पड़ा

[@Indra6065]

😂

[@wonderboy9764]

hahaha apni mahabharat me na 😂😂😂

[@pankajjoshi291]

Tu hi likh le na bhai apna khudka mahabharata

[@vikramgupta3195]

कहा थे ज्ञानी महाराज 😂😂

[@rahulmahara896]

Lgta h bhai kalki or genz ke tym ki mhabharat pda h😂😂😂

[@JOD_MESSI_666]

I'm a big fan of Karan ❤

[@Biotech_is_life]

Tv serials vala Karn bol 😂

[@taeberrie]

Just say you're too fascinated watching that pseudo made heroic image of Karn by movies and stupid serials and you're too lazy to read real one😂

[@thesentry1434]

On which basis you are fan of Karn

[@meerimeeri4659]

Karna was a asur in previous birth so he was born with same asuri qualities or say purva janm sanskar 😂 was not a good one he was powerful because in purva janm he did tapasya of surya dev so he got 100 sheilds against nar n narayan avtars of vishnu.. Then nar n narayan broke 99 of them n that asur went to surya dev to protect hum from nar n narayan surya dev saved him n later gave him as a son to kunti

[@Itsjay-pc4mv]

Fan bano but bhakt nahi

[@navya5679]

The questions the guy is asking just goes to show how simplistic ppl want things to be and want everything to be served on a platter rather than even try to understand and appreciate the nuances and complexities. We have been trained to think in only one way, the Western way

[@AmitKumar-yj4nq]

I have Ganguli's Mahabharat opened. I wish I could attach a screenshot. Here's what it says:"And beholding the plight of those monarchs, Karna that foremost of all wielders of the bow went to where the bow was, and quickly raising it strung it and placed the arrows on the string. And beholding the son of Surya--Karna of the Suta tribe--like unto fire, or Soma, or Surya himself, resolved to shoot the mark, those foremost of bowmen--the sons of Pandu--regarded the mark as already shot and brought down upon the ground. But seeing Karna, Draupadi loudly said, 'I will not select a Suta for my lord.' Then Karna, laughing in vexation and casting glance at the Sun, threw aside the bow already drawn to a circle." What he is describing is indeed another version, but it is very insensitive to name Ganguly and then claiming that incident is not mentioned. I know other two versions where Karna failed. In one he couldn't tie the rope and in other he missed the target by a hair''s distance. I no longer remember what were those. Not a Karna fan, but anyone who writes a book on Mahabharta is adding another interpretation in the sea of many already existing. Everyone in MB is grey and it has context based hero and vaillains. For instance, in the game of dice, everyone other than Bhimasen, Vidura, and Vikarna is a villain. Not Arjuna, but Bhima is the hero in early parts (note Hidimba vadh, Bakasur vadh, etc.) Moreover, all the quotes of the kind 'who is better warrior' is someone's opinion and can not be taken seriously. There is a very good reason for 'Yat Bharto tat Bhartam'. Three realistic theme of MB are: 1) People are grey: no hero or villain, 2) War is not sports: rules doesn't work and fighting in arena is not same as fighting in Kurukshetra, 3) People who are evil are also powerful; It's better to kill them in unfair fight for the sake of greater good than losing in a fair fight and let them continue their evil.

[@AmitKumar-yj4nq]

I could have counted many more themes, but I want people to read and think themselves and please don't write a book on MB after that; we already have enough.

[@AmitKumar-yj4nq]

@indraneelsarkar8590 Thanks for shading the light. If I remember correctly, just like William Jones was researching Indian heritage, Mahabharata was collected by German scholars, including mathematicians like Felix Grassmann. They were frustrated that how could Indians let such a gem get disorganised in that way. At that time, they could only conclude with three alternate versions and these were called Kolkata edition(Ganguly), Madras edition, and one more. Later historians, like Thapar, also strikes at the fact that there were later people who had no knowledge of weapons added excerpts according to their prejudice. Here’s a very good example. Ever seen a tribal bow and arrow? I will award you a prize if you can use your thumb for a long time. Thumb is not used. The way its string is made, will itself discourage you to use thumb. That means, either Eklavya was not using his thumb, or Dronacharya helped him! The person who added this passage wanted to see you Dronacharya as oppressor. Similarly, if you notice that Karna used Vijay then can you explain to yourself that how could he fail to string that random ordinary bow (to my knowledge, its ordinary bow, unlike that used in Ramayana). The version where he failed to hit the target by a hair’s distance does make full sense. I can shed more light on these by knowledge of ancient Indian warfare and schools (thanks to my great grandfather who was a ‘Bhargava’ warfare acharya) but who has time to correct people, especially in the era where people think Shankaracharya knows less about Hinduism than politicians.

[@AmitKumar-yj4nq]

...as an aside, let me bring something that has never been touched by any historian, and stems from my knowledge of Neuroscience. Mahabharata has a very strong personality consistency. Krishna behaves in a way a child raised elsewhere should behave. Karna behaves in a way an abandoned child behaves. And so on... So, either all the characters did exist or the author is an 'impossible' genius.

[@AmitKumar-yj4nq]

@indraneelsarkar8590 although I agree that his valour is not superior to Arjuna's valour, but Draupadi's swayamvar does not prove anything on this line. That's what Mahabharata is warning people: "war is not sports. A single miss-step can get you killed." You can see this trend everywhere in the world. Once people had less fightings to do, warfare strated getting replaced by sports (cf Roman arena), with less and less war elements, which could give warriors a very dangerous perception of war. Thucidides was teaching similar things in Greeks.

[@AmitKumar-yj4nq]

@indraneelsarkar8590 I didn’t know that BORI stands for Bhandarkar and Oriental research Institute. That’s the first Mahabharata I read.... pointed out by B R Chopra Mahabharata. If you guys make everything short, it’s not my fault = D. Actually, this Mahabharata was the reason I became sanyasi for a while, seeking more truth, as I wasn’t satisfied, and I read everything else after that; Ganguli at the end. I only care about the truth, so obviously I was not going to stay at one place. They are indeed very good, very critical. But, I was discovering many flaws, possibly because of my knowledge of ancient Indian warfare. Writers of BORI did fresh research from the beginning. It doesn’t follow German’s scholars. To be honest, I got aligned more with works of people like Oldenburg and Winterniz. They contrast with West, very much like Radhakrishnan does in his Gita. Of course, there’s no point of any further discussion then, as I am climbing down the stairs since I read BORI, trying to get to the bottom. It’s been 15 years, so I don’t remember passages very well, nor I have access to it.

[@vinoddeshmukh193]

Karna the great 🌞🏹🚩

[@Jaimaibhawani]

Karn ko to bheem ne 3-4 bar hraya hai bhai

[@bhavdipsinhgohil]

महाभारत पढ पर सीरीयल मत देखना❤

[@AbhishekSharma-ix2qt]

villian bhi aisa hona chaahiye jiske ldaai mei aane ki baat sunkr hi opposition mei tension ka mahol bn jaaye aur usey kamzor karne ke liye SAAM DAAM DAND BHED sabka istemaal karna pade. #hatsoffKARN

[@ayushkesharwani7814]

पूरे महाभारत के केवल 2 ही योद्धा थे जिसके आने से शत्रुओं में भय उत्पन्न हो जाता था और वो 2 योद्धा अर्जुन और भीम है। (जिसका सबसे बड़ा प्रमाण 14 दिन का युद्ध है जिसमे अर्जुन की एक प्रतिज्ञा सुन कर कौरव ऐसे डरे की अपने पूरे 11 अक्षौहणी सेना को चक्रशकट ब्यूह बनाके सिर्फ एक आदमी (जयद्रथ) की सुरक्षा में लगा दिया था फिर भी वो जयद्रथ को नही बचा पाए) ऐसे ही भीम ने जब दुःशाशन को मारा तब कर्ण तो डर ही गया था फिर शल्य को उसे सांत्वना देकर उसका भय दूर करना पड़ा था (कर्ण पर्व अध्याय 84 में पढ़ लेना) इसके अलावा युद्ध शुरू होने से पहले का ही पढ़ लेना जिसमे भीम को सामने देखा दुर्योधन की सेना का उत्साह भंग हो गया था कौरवो ने इंद्रप्रथ हड़पने के लिए कपट धुत का षड्यंत्र भी इसीलिए बनाया था क्योंकि लड़ के इंद्रप्रस्थ जितने की उनमें शक्ति ही नही थी (और पहले भी उनकी जितनी भी लड़ाई हुई थी उसमे कौरव और कर्ण हारे ही है) और कर्ण के आने से पांडव सेना को कोई घंटा फर्क नही पड़ा था। कर्ण तो 2 दिन भी सेनापति पद नही सम्हाल सका था और ना ही कोई बड़े पांडव योद्धा को मार ही पाया। (सिर्फ एक घटोत्कच को मारा वो भी वसवी के दम में) उसके अलावा वो पांडवों का कुछ बड़ा नुकसान भी नही कर सका। ऊपर से कौरवों के सबसे ज्यादा नुकसान भी कर्ण के सेनापति रहते ही हुआ था। इतना नुकसान की कौरवों की सेना जो बड़ी थी वो पांडवों से छोटी हो गई थी।

[@SREE-OT7]

Correct hai

[@Bharatvanshii]

Listen, ami ganatra podcast ....she clears almost every confusion

[@dilipsarkar1043]

Virat judh mein Arjun ke saath kishan ji nahi the, usi din pitamah Bhishma bola tha aaj humara mrityu nishchit😂😂😂

[@25Future]

Karana agar itna hi kamjor tha to bhagwan indra ko kyu aana pada bich mai or karana k kavhach kundal lene pade

[@MatwarRawat-k2b]

Kyun Ki Karn Ko Joh Kavach Kundal Mila Tha Woh Indra Ne Surya Dev Ko Diya Tha Aur Surya Dev Se Karn Ko Mila Isliye Indra Ka Aana Zaroori Tha

[@harshrawat962]

@@MatwarRawat-k2b suryadev ka hi tha yar vo ajib baatein kyu karte ho tum

[@25Future]

@@MatwarRawat-k2b bas kar bhai ab kya khani bna rha hai

[@AshishSharma-jb7lc]

Karn ke kavach kundal bas karn ki jaan bacha sakte the jitwa nahi sakte the karn ko arjun se agr yudh me karn par kavach kundal hota to arjun uski halat adhmari kardeta jisse karn ladne layak nahi rehta or jit arjun ki hi hoti lekin shree krisna ne bola tha har ek kkuruvanshi ki mot nishchit hai pandavo ke alwa to unki baat satya tbhi hoti jab kavach kundal karn pr nahi hote or Shree Krishna rachayita hai unhone jo kiya sahi hi kiya unpr ungli uthane ki aukaat naah teri hai naa meri

[@harshrawat962]

@@AshishSharma-jb7lc bro admari halat arjuna ne karn ki kahi ni kri thi Mahabharat pdh le han virat yudh me karna hara tha puri kaurav sena hari thi par vo isiliye hua tha kyuki viswakarma ne maya ka istemal kra tha kauravo me aur 14 ve din bhi arjuna ko rokna muskil isiliye tha kyuki us din mahadev yudh kr rhe the arjuna ke sath

[@pramitkhan7729]

Some people are giving the argument that, if Arjun is more powerful than Karna then why Indra took his Kavach. People need to understand the simple fact that, nobody could kill Karna because of that Kavach, but he could be defeated. Defeat and death are two different things. Karna lost against Drupad, Chitrasen defeated Karna in Gandhrva war and Karna fled from the war, Bheem defeated Karna when Bheem went to Anga desh for Ashwamedh yagna, Whole Kuru army along with Karna got defeated by Arjun alone. Apart from the separation of Kunti, his whole life was way more happier and privileged than Pandavas. Serial lovers should at least cross check the details.

[@anandshroff5398]

One more thing , everyone who had any kind of divine weapons or power they achieved either with education or tapasya , and upon death everything was taken from them . Karna was the only who got protection right from birth which was injustice towards other warriors that’s why Indra takes it and calls out Sun God for his discrimination

[@pramitkhan7729]

@@anandshroff5398 Absolutely, but some people won't see this.

[@jaymahajan1695]

।।।।कोई नही समझेंगा भाई! अब महाभारत दो हिस्सो मे बट गई है- एक अर्जुन और दूसरा कर्ण। इन दोनो के अलावा लोगो के पास महाभारत में कोई चर्चा का विषय ही नही है। महाभारत में ययाति चरित्र आता है, जो की एक बहुत अच्छा चर्चा का विषय हो सकता है। पर लोग बात करते नही। महाभारत में कुरुक्षेत्र के युद्ध के बाद पितामह भीष्म और युधिष्ठिर के संवाद में बहुत सी ज्ञान की बाते है, पर कोई चर्चा नहीं करता। महाभारत में भागवत गीता है, अनु गीता है, काम गीता है, इतने सारे टॉपिक है पर अर्जुन कर्ण के अलावा कुछ लोगो को चर्चा करने का इंटरेस्ट ही नही है। जब सच बताए तो इन्हे लगता है की कर्ण की बुराई कर रहे है। अब सीरियल्स ने कर्ण को हीरो देखा दिया है इसी कारण इनके मन में कर्ण को लेकर अलग ही इमेज बन गई है, जिस कारण कितना भी सच बोल दो इंच कर्ण को ही सपोर्ट करना होता है। जिसने कृष्ण को नही चुना उसे भला कोन फैन हो सकता है। इसमें कोई संदेह नहीं को कर्ण एक अच्छा योद्धा था पर अर्जुन तो अर्जुन ही था। इन्हे लगता है की इतिहास जितने वाले लिखते है। अगर दुर्योधन जीता होता तो बात कुछ और होती। कुछ भी बिना सिर पैर की बाते करते है।

[@pramitkhan7729]

@@jaymahajan1695 ekdam sahi kaha bhai, Mahabharat mein bohot si aysi cheez hai jo hume sikhna chahiye. Gita ka gyan, Yudhishir ka Bhisma pitamah se gyan lena, Vidur niti, Kurukshetra se pehle ka shanti samjhote ka prayas... In sabhi cheez bohot important hai. Vedvyas ne Karna ko Shakuni se bhi bura bataya hai, woh ek adharmi tha jo bachpan me Bheem ko zaher deke marne mei shamil tha, lakshyagraha ke plan mei shamil tha, hamesha se Arjun se jalta raha, Draupadi ko veshya keh ke apman kiya, virat yudh ke pehe Kripacharya and Dronacharya ko apman kiya, Madra desh ke raja Shalya ke samne Madra desh ki mahilayon ko apman kiya, Parshuram se jhoot bolke divyastra sikhne ki kosish kiya, aur bhi bohot kuch. Liberals ne apne matlab keliye Karna ko hero banaya hai.

[@jaymahajan1695]

​​​​​@@pramitkhan7729 ये बात आपने सही कही है। पर यही बात कोई किसी पॉडकास्ट में बोले तो लोगो को बुरा लग जाता है। महाभारत मुझे बहुत पसंद है, महाभारत की चर्चा करना उससे भी ज्यादा पसंद है, पर बस एक ये पागलपंती के कारण की लोग महाभारत पड़ने के बाद भी कर्ण को पसंद कर ही कैसे सकते है, मुझे महाभारत की चर्चा करना अच्छा नहीं लगता। 😂वैसे भी भगवान खुद कहते है की नास्तिको और जो मेरी लीलाओं को न समझ सके उससे कभी मेरी लीलाओं का वर्णन करना भी नही चाहिए। अर्जुन जैसा धनुर्धर कोई है ही नही। खुद भीष्म, द्रोणाचार्य और अश्वथामा भी अर्जुन को अजय मानते थे। 😂पर कर्ण भक्तों की बुद्धि भी कर्ण और दुर्योधन जैसे ही है जो उन्हें लगता है की भीष्म और द्रोण पूरी ताकत से अर्जुन के साथ युद्ध नही कर रहे है, जब की ये झूठ है। अर्जुन हर एक दिव्यास्त्र का तोड़ जनता था। जो द्रोणाचार्य जानते थे, वो तो अर्जुन भी जनता था। अर्जुन ने सब कुछ सीख लिया था, यही कारण था कि द्रोणाचार्य अर्जुन को अजय मानते था। 😂क्युकी ऐसा कोई परीक्षा ही नही थी जिसे पार करना अर्जुन ना जनता हो।।।।।।।।।

[@ShriKshetraPurusottama]

Karna was the most negative person in Mahabharata... that was natural as he didn't get what he expected...

[@s.psumankumar715]

I love karn

[@Artik-u8l]

​@@s.psumankumar715Because it is kali yoga.

[@omkarnathbharadwaj7042]

Iravati Karve's book Yuganta is a must for every Mahabharat enthusiast.

[@wolfeinstine6677]

Bori Mahabharata critical edition original scriptures padho

[@soumyadeepdutta3852]

faltu hain wo 😂😂😂😂😂adha jhoot Maine pada hain sage Ved vyas aur Kmg version best Hain along with Iravati's karve.​@@wolfeinstine6677

[@darkclouds6246]

​@@wolfeinstine6677but original scripture destroyed by 1000 years ago 😂😂😂

[@wolfeinstine6677]

@@darkclouds6246 true but these scriptures older than the one you read.

[@rahulanand2142]

There is nothing like original Mahabharat available, it was already extinct and the stories of mahabharat is circulated generation by generation which also gets modified time to time.

[@Red-Hood12]

Karna FANS - Karna was greater archer than Arjuna: In Virat Yuddh, Arjuna (while being a half-man as Brihannala, due to Urvashi's curse) single handedly defeated entire kuru warriors (along with their army) all alone. It's because Karna had Kavach kundal for his protection from death since birth. And Bhishma had a boon that he cannot die without his own wish. And Dronacharya being a guru of Arjun, he won't kill him. And Ashwatthama had a stone on his forehead, thus made him kinda immortal. And Kripacharya also 'Chiranjeevi'. And also Duryodhan's Kavach given by Dronacharya which were as effective as Karna's Kavach, so Duryodhan won't die either. Only Arjuna was without any boon or protection- PURE TALENT.

[@soulknight3004]

Then why did Indra take karna's kavach if he is so powerful??

[@Red-Hood12]

@@soulknight3004 Karna FANS - Karna's Kawach kundal was taken by Lord Indra Deceitfully: No, it was a pure transaction between Karna and Lord Indra. If Lord Indra was so fond of Karna's donations, Why did Lord Indra make a condition that the 'vaisavi shakti' astra can only be used by just one time, and not many times? Because Karna demanded that astra as a substitute for kawach kundal, for which Indra denied first, but after insisting by Karna, Indra put forth his conditions of using that astra only one time. A. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, why did Lord Indra gave his 'vaisavi shakti' astra to Karna? If Indra already knew that Karna would use that 'vaisavi shakti' to kill Arjuna, then Indra would be the most STUPIDEST father in the entire Dwapar Yuga, who in spite of saving his son, giving the power to his son's enemy. Obviously it was NOT any 'aashirvaad' by Indra. Karna Fans & TV shows: •Indra ask Karna to give his kawach kundal as a donation. •Karna gave those kawach kundal to Indra. •Indra impressed and by his own wish gave Karna - vaisavi shakti. "How stupid Indra was - to save his son, he gave a deadly weapon so that Karna would kill his son Arjuna." - Sarcastically speaking. Here's how it happened: •Indra ask Karna to give his kawach kundal as a donation. •Karna rejected first, and then asked for a favor in return - vaisavi shakti. •Indra rejected that offer first - he knew Karna would use that weapon against Arjuna. •Karna also refused to donate his kawach kundal to Indra. •Indra then make a deal to use that vaisavi shakti astra only one time, after that it will return to Indra. •Karna agreed to that deal and gave his kawach kundal to Indra. B. If Lord Indra was so insecured about his son Arjuna, why didn't Lord Indra gave those kawach kundal to Arjuna afterwards? - it's because Indra wasn't worried about his son Arjuna, he just wanted to remove those protection from Karna, so that Karna would die. "Indra dev ko iss baat ki chinta nahin thi ki Arjuna ko kaise bachayenge, balki iss baat ki chinta thi ki karna ko kaise maarenge, Indra dev ko Arjuna ki shakti aur saamarthya pe pura bharosa hai"

[@AshishSharma-kg5ur]

Like u have read the text book

[@AshishSharma-kg5ur]

Like u have read the text book

[@shikhasidney844]

Arjun is a product of nepotism. I am not saying he did not have talent. He was a good warrior. Yes no one could match him but only because whenever someone who had the talent became a challenge to Arjun one of Arjun's godfathers like Bheeshma, Dron, kripa etc always had Arjun's back and tried to ruin the carriers of others who were a a challenge to Arjun. Like in the case of Eklavya where his right thumb was asked as guru dakshina or when Karna was rejected for education citing the excuse of his birth.

[@vickymahey9188]

Jis jis ne Mahabharat padhi hai unko pata hai ke karn ek bhagoda, thha or humesha yudh se bhaag jata thha 🤣

[@b8bb8r]

Muni vyas ne humare itihas ko likh ke nahi diya, puzzle bana ke di ki log khelte rahein. Waah! 🫡