Good stuff, man. One item though, the effective flange table refers to the clear distance to the next adjacent web rather than the C2C distance. Otherwise, great job explaining the topic!
@Kestava_Engineering3 жыл бұрын
Philip you are absolutely right! man read it and looked right over it. thank you for the correction, and thankfully it did not control in this instance. keep checking my work! I always appreciate it.
@Kestava_Engineering3 жыл бұрын
SHOOT IT DOES CONTROL!
@djphonix3 жыл бұрын
@@Kestava_Engineering hehe yeah I noticed it controlled while watching and was thinking “aww man, I hope nobody roasts him on this!” Really enjoying your videos so you won’t get any roasts from me 👍🏼
@Kestava_Engineering3 жыл бұрын
@@djphonix My man I appreciate all the support! Keep me honest always! also it looks like the totally capacity is still correct as the effective width would still be up to 34" so we are OK from a liability perspective haha. dodged that bullet... this time!
@jonathanlitoff51423 жыл бұрын
@@Kestava_Engineering If the width of the web is constant, then wouldn’t b.web + clear span always be equal to the dimension between web center lines? For this problem, it would be 10” + 24”, or 34”. Also, I really enjoy these PE related videos
@sallymcfadden39409 ай бұрын
These videos are really outstanding. Clear and so well delivered with humor and goodwill.
@jacksonmurrell44510 ай бұрын
Thank you Rich!!!! Please continue with these videos, you do young engineers a huge service.
@Mirand.uhhhxx2 жыл бұрын
Your making me feel good that I keep catching these little mistakes! Love your vids
@Kestava_Engineering2 жыл бұрын
Glad to help! and thank you!
@briangollini11 ай бұрын
keep up the good work
@elbahja032 жыл бұрын
Great video man , as always, thanks a lot! I think you're missing 1 more step after you got you "a" value you should get your "c" value and do a strain compatibility check to make sure you're in the TFC zone, otherwise your reduction factor may be lower than 0.9 and thus your ultimate moment capacity may be lower. Thanks!
@Kestava_Engineering2 жыл бұрын
Good call! tension force controlled members is for sure a must do check!
@chandrasajana22993 жыл бұрын
thanks man, keep going!!
@NataliePadgett-b9e Жыл бұрын
Thanks for making these! Quick question, should your a value be the NA of the compression area from the bottom not from the top? That way you have the correct moment arm distance to the tension force. I am finding my a = 1.22".
@sugassuwag75139 ай бұрын
a is not the distance from top to neutral axis, it is the width of the compression block. therefore he use Mn = .85*f'c*Ac*distance between T and C. Distnace between T and C is calculated as 12-1.04 = 10.96"
@곰탱이-k3r2 жыл бұрын
So helpful. Appreciate for your efforts. BTW, what about the case to find the reinforcement area (As) if the moment capacity is given? Is it the same approach?
@sereneobscene Жыл бұрын
Great video, like all of them! One question though... at the end, shouldn't the moment equation have ("a"/2), so (1.04"/2)?
@aej-xw7hi Жыл бұрын
No, since a is the total height of your compression block for a rectangular section, a/2 is actually the centroid from the top of beam. Since you're finding that centroid distance through the summation of areas for the T beam, dividing by 2 isn't necessary.
@aej-xw7hi Жыл бұрын
16:52
@huseyinsanal Жыл бұрын
Thank you for videos, so helpful. I like your engineering approach. I have an question regarding effective flange width. As per ACI 318 ( 6.3.2.1. ), the effective flange with bf shall include the beam web width bw plus sn effective overhanging flange width in accordance with Table 6.3.2.1. I think effective flange width calculated as bf=bw + min ( 8h, sw/2,ln/8). Am I wrong, if I am where is my mistake? Thanks.
@Kestava_Engineering Жыл бұрын
you are correct! just remember you get to take the value and multiply by 2 to account for each flange. I may have made a mistake in my video!
@chris_38517 күн бұрын
Husey, it's calculated as bf=bw + 2[OVERHANG] --> bf=bw + 2[min ( 8h, sw/2,ln/8)]. For a standard T-beam, there is an OVERHANG on both sides so we have to multiply by (2)
@jonsoh53093 жыл бұрын
this is very helpful! Could you do a similar problem where you have to find ultimate moment but with fully composite beam?
@Kestava_Engineering3 жыл бұрын
Jon Soh consider it added to the list my dude. I see you like to spice things up.!
@yemanemelkamu56826 ай бұрын
but according to ACI sw refers to clear distance between webs ,there for the least would be sw/2=(34-10)/2=12in not 16 in
@muhammadasadameerkhan81053 жыл бұрын
perfect video. sir can i have get in contact with you for some knowledgeable discussion??
@Kestava_Engineering3 жыл бұрын
email me anytime! my contact email is in my page description
@winterpalace23073 жыл бұрын
Can you do base plate and anchor bolts design for steel colomn please, I have been looking for it since a while now . Also would you mind giving me your Email in Case I needed to ask questions , thanks dude you're doing a great job 👍
@Kestava_Engineering3 жыл бұрын
Winter Palace - I love the idea, consider it added!
@vampirekabir3 жыл бұрын
change ur channel name to "the cool civil engineer"
@Kestava_Engineering3 жыл бұрын
Doing everything I can to show the "Cool" side of structural engineering!