Nancy Brophy murder trial: Day 15, afternoon session | Live stream

[@jenny_b_]

The only thing the defense witnesses are doing is convincing me what an absolutely incredible human being Dan Brophy was. God bless his sweet, tenacious soul.

[@isabellind1292]

Seeing the picture of Dan holding his red rooster (I think it's a rooster) is so touching. It speaks to his loving & caring nature. I can imagine his chickens & dogs loved him so much, seeing him bright & early to tend to them every day. And dropping off coffee grounds to his neighbor for her garden. 🌱💓He was so beloved. What a sweet & beautiful soul. RIP Dan Brophy.🌹❤

[@alswedgin9274]

I agree; the victim is all around portrait as the type of person you want/need in your community.

[@swedishgrrl7287]

If I hear another description of Live Fire I’m going to gouge my eyes out 😱

[@Florida-Plant-Mom]

Geez, the defense is killing us with unpreparedness and boredom.

[@barbiekat6352]

No kidding! They act like they are making small talk at a church pot luck! 🙄🙄🙄

[@hoppy6141]

These are supposed to be a competent legal team but all I see is fumbling everywhere.

[@nonmihiseddeo4181]

@@hoppy6141 I think the defense could have done a better job, if not for their client's B I G mouth on the witness stand, admitting to actions she previously denied or said she had amnesia for, as well as that she told her attorneys falsehoods, which they used to craft their defense.

[@ld-zj1bn]

Providing great defense witnesses for the prosecution anyway.

[@candacesalim9659]

Hmmm why was the Garden over run and the blackberry bushes over whelming..... He was working two + JOBS while his wife over spent, lived in vivid fantasy all while claiming to be an author and planning his death. Jesus He deserved rest. He deserved love and real admiration. A narcissist through and through.

[@aimeerestad6521]

She was probably poisoning him too!

[@sheinFL]

Geez dan worked 7 days a week, fed the chickens, made dinner, did laundry. No time for his garden :(

[@leeprimeau7912]

@@sheinFLyes!!! She laid in bed drinking coffee and “writing” and meeting her friends for lunch. Did you see Dan’s son get up on the stand and give his victim impact statement??? It was PERFECT!

[@iveliserojas612]

Thank you she lying for Nancy you can tell

[@barbaragrove6097]

Estrada's memory was pretty good when defense questioned her, but when prosecution questioned her, it was so long ago she couldn't recall.

[@iveliserojas612]

Yup and lying

[@Kate-fr7qc]

The evidence is overwhelming against her, the guns, the citing of her van, the insurance.

[@gala_pi]

I pray justice is served. And jury will be critical. This has been dragging ....

[@Army4life82]

I'm not a doctor but, if Dan was doing all of these uncharacteristic things IMO it's a sign of depression, being overwhelmed to keep this witch 🤬 happy. Basically overworking that he didn't have time to do the things he truly loved like tending to his garden. Just my own personal opinion on the matter

[@Rae_777]

I think that’s definitely coming across in all of the personal/home witnesses. One thing I’ve noticed watching family murder trials is that most narcissists begin to kill their victim psychologically before they finish the job ☹️

[@iveliserojas612]

Your so correct she wasn’t working at all lazy

[@iveliserojas612]

Your so correct she wasn’t working at all lazy it get me so mad that she had a chef husband who worked took care of and she killed him for more money I wish I had that

[@NellPlotts]

The husband of Nancy’s niece said that he had boxes of her stuff in his basement. When asked by the prosecutor if he had gone through it he said “No, it is her stuff”. I wonder how long it will take the police to get a search order?

[@sleuththewild]

Get out the popcorn.... I thought this was a fab moment. He also did a good job for the prosecution. I think his wife will ream him tonight. He seems to be a very honest what-you-see-is-what-you-get guy, she a wolf in sheep's clothing. I can't see those two being together at all. And he never looked at Nancy. Yeah, prosecution! Get the search warrant!

[@barbaragrove6097]

@@sleuththewild The niece (Estrada) isn't Gitchell's wife, is she? She said her children are grown and he mentioned having a young son. He lives in Portland and I think Estrada lives in TX.

[@sleuththewild]

@@barbaragrove6097 Yes, the niece is his wife AFAIK. She looks older than he does, so maybe she had a previous marriage? That was my understanding.

[@sleuththewild]

@@barbaragrove6097 Nancy is Gitchell's wife's aunt. That's how he describes himself on the stand. I took this to mean he's married to Susan.

[@barbaragrove6097]

@@sleuththewild I wondered if his wife was another niece of Nancy's.

[@jodydarby]

‘You know?’ ‘You know?’ God bless. Stop it!! No. We don’t know, and your testimony is POINTLESS.

[@sleuththewild]

Wow, I'm looking at old footage. Nancy spoke of Dan as the shooting victim before Law enforcement told her he was. And she never asked after Dan, if he was okay, etc. until a ways into her first interview. Never "I'm worried about him".

[@StellaFl]

So..... without a scintilla of evidence and just because he's homeless and in the area the defense has the right to accuse Oscar of murder or at least strongly insinuate that he murdered Dan ????? They broadcast his name and face for the entire world to see and that is allowed???? If that's not slander, I don't know what is. How is that allowed? #fuming I hope Oscar can find a lawyer who will win him a nice settlement from these despicable attorneys.

[@GH-oi2jf]

Everything said in court is privileged.

[@StellaFl]

@@GH-oi2jf I don't think that's the case when it's broadcast live around the world.

[@saharaussery6799]

The "some other dude did it" defense is a classic...and it almost always involves naming some "other dude" and pointing the finger at that person as the killer...they also insinuated that it could have been any one of the students using the GI Bill to pay tuition...because, of course, any of them could just flip out from ptsd and shoot the place up (despicable suggestion). They also brought up that it could have been some "enraged" person who applied to the school but didn't get into classes...or any electrician/repairman/plumber/gas man that had ever come to the school. The prosecution clearly brought out with more than one witness that Oscar was cleared as a possibility.

[@StellaFl]

@@saharaussery6799 You're right. I take issue with the fact the defense not only named Oscar but they also showed his face. What if that person was me or you or anyone else who happened to be in the area?

[@saharaussery6799]

@@StellaFl well...when she is convicted, all those she wrongly accused will be vindicated

[@rsantella8008]

I think defense can try to point the jury in a hundred different directions, but it's not going to erase the fact that they have her SUV circling the block the morning of the shooting when she said she was at home. How do you get past that?

[@R3cuzican]

Exactly but instead they want to focus on coffee, a puddle and a homeless man canning… oh and a phone bill after the fact

[@DEBORAH4-ut9sz]

How do you get past Nancy writing a book entitled "How to Murder your Husband"? Who thinks like that and who would want to buy that book? Dan should have seen a red flag right there! I always tell couples that both should be involved in managing the couples finances and work as team in all that a married couple's work life, home life and hobbies and personal interests otherwise you grow apart and end up in divorce ....or as in too many cases, 1 takes the life of the other for reasons 'normal' people can't wrap their arounds around. Ex: The Murdaugh murders and his extensive financial crimes against his clients and employer is the most egregious case of a narcissistic sociopath with intelligence and charisma to fool so many for so long! I think Nancy hoodwinked everyone too but in the case of Alec Murdaugh, i can see murdering your wife but your your son who loved and trusted his father to the 9s blows his head off with a shotgun blast!?!! ugh What goes on behind closed doors between married couples is in many cases is hidden behind their closed doors but to kill your own child/ren is another level of monster! Ex: CHRISTopher Coleman; CHRISTopher Watts; CHRISTian Longo are 3 family annihilators who got life and Coleman who refuses to confess to this day, should have gotten the Death Penalty imo. I think if Nancy doesn't come clean, she should die in prison but if she does and is remorseful, she deserves another chance. I doubt that at her age she can be REDeemed but i'm willing to let time tell and pray she does. I don't think Nancy is a risk to re-offend and living on the outside under supervision, she could continue to write books about her fall from God's grace and the human race as the bill$ pilling up caused her to become desperate and desperate people do desperate things. My point is ~ she could be on outside under supervision and pay her own way v taxpayers paying for her life behind bar$

[@mairelocwudu922]

The judge should be noticing that NB is coaching Susan by shaking her head. Watch when the defense is questioning about insurance commission hold backs....Nancy is coaching by shaking her head yes. SHe's probably been doing it throughout the testimony as I've caught Susan looking over and smiling or shrugging when she doesn't know the answer but Nancy is not always in the frame so I can see what she is doing. The coaching is so blatant during the defense re-cross in how insurance commissions are paid-that shouldn't have been missed by the judge and the defense should have been admonished. Check 21:53, 22:22, 23:00....

[@judithengle7875]

Thanks so much for bringing this up. I wish we could bump this comment.

[@janee9169]

That is very interesting! I admit I don't keep my eyes on my phone screen very much so didnt see this. I'm surprised judge and/or state don't say something.

[@kimgale262]

Could you imagine a family gathering with this lot. Every one of them says YOU KNOW YOU KNOW YOU KNOW..... When the families have conversations there can't be much substance when everyone is saying YOU KNOW during said conversation.

[@michaeladragon]

Umm, you know, it might, umm, be, you know, fun or umm something

[@kimgale262]

@@michaeladragon Right!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@kimgale262]

@@michaeladragon I wonder how much "YOU KNOW ummmm" Nancy writes in her novels.

[@sleuththewild]

Nancy had 2 expensive Starbucks coffees a day? That’s, like, $300 per month.

[@hoppy6141]

The WF credit card statement shown by PPB forensic accountant during direct showed a $4.25 SB charge every day. That’s a more expensive drink for 2018 menu. No wonder she didn’t pay the mortgage with $140k cash income - she spent lots on all kinds of other things and the ins premiums!

[@sleuththewild]

I thought it was only one Starbucks a day we were talking about, but in her testimony, Susan said there were at least 2 every day. Dan bought her one first thing in the morning and brought it to her in bed. Such a sweet guy.

[@sleuththewild]

IIRC Dan was bringing home less than $3k per month. I don’t remember the $145k. The insurance was over half their monthly salary deposit.

[@hoppy6141]

@@sleuththewild the tax expert testified to that number. Which actually isn’t a good point for defense - she couldn’t make due even with that amount.

[@hoppy6141]

@@sleuththewild I haven’t been able to listen the the daily ear bleeding but that is really nice to get up early like that. She was treated like a queen.

[@Florida-Plant-Mom]

I’ve had to put this on double speed to get through it.

[@michaeladragon]

That's what I've been doing, but then all the "umms" are even more annoying

[@R3cuzican]

Same I had to keep skipping

[@cadencechrome4783]

This woman is attempting to out guess and slide by the prosecutors questions. She hasn't realized she is giving him what he wants. He is very good at hiding the points he wants in seemingly innocuous questions. She is not slick enough. She fails.

[@sleuththewild]

I actually think the prosecution is very effective (except on insurance questions). Overstreet has daggers, but presents them like butter knives. Susan makes things worse and worse for herself the longer she talks, and Overstreet is sounding like Mr. Nice Guy, politely letting her get away with it. Susan has no idea the information she is giving away....

[@faithf.malcolm3739]

The prosecutor totally own every defense witness so far😏

[@Jessica.Rachel]

It's remarkable how plainly dishonest the niece is, and her disrespect for the court proceedings just makes her look entitled and petulant. Yes dear, if you agree to testify, you will be cross examined. Amazing such lunatics walk among us as if they're normal people. Ugh.

[@DEBORAH4-ut9sz]

Oh please! she loves her aunt and the prosecution works to demonize the accused to get a conviction and so, don't blame the niece as love is blind. Remember! Judas is always those you love and trust who betray you for $ ... Dan's love for Nancy blinded him to the red flags. She wrote a book entitle "how to murder your husband' for Pete's sake ~ who thinks like that??? and should have been a red flag for him but 'the blind man' only see if JESUS is ABEL to teach and heal the blind ~ FIGuratively speaKING ~.

[@ld-zj1bn]

😂 Susan Estrada, the prosecution witness Nancy deserves.

[@sleuththewild]

Defense attorney said you have to be wealthy to stay in that house. Actually, that house was a bargain ($1500/mo)...way below current market rates, and any rental would have been at least twice as much. Also, Dan must have been about 10 years from paying it off, a much healthier nest egg than paying for insurance. Nancy's ideas would have cost a fortune. A condo + HOA fees on the Portland riverfront? Ha! That's not downsizing, that's upsizing, and it's for rich people.

[@barbaragrove6097]

"Management" seems financially challenged.

[@barbiekat6352]

She planned on getting a “windfall” soon!

[@faithf.malcolm3739]

Nancy wanted out of that messy house and boring marriage, so she killed him for that new life. Sad!

[@barbaragrove6097]

@@faithf.malcolm3739 and she wanted off the $inking ship, and life insurance would do the trick

[@barbiekat6352]

@@faithf.malcolm3739 people like Nancy are as “messy” on the inside as that house was on the outside!

[@dreamsthatgotogether7553]

Where’s the part where she says “I can’t defend myself against the truth” lol

[@brenandbruiser9885]

It’s on her cross examination. The prosecutor also asks her “are you done?” And she answers “probably way more than I would like to be.”

[@nitabrozowski4021]

It seems like most of the witnesses for the defense are more of a help to the prosecution than the defense, or at the very least not helpful for the defense at all. And some of the questions the defense is asking some of these witnesses - ?? Chef Brophy‘s protégé only exemplified what a great guy he was. What on earth did that do for the defense?

[@PinkyakaAyannaj]

Exactly...it just showed everyone that Dan didn't deserve to be murdered 😢 Dan was probably looking so forward to walking her down the aisle in place of her father who died young😢 Nancy even said that she "cried on cue" in the 1 jail phone call that was allowed into evidence 🙁 Nancy ruined so many lives with her act of greed😡

[@sleuththewild]

Great comparative testimony to Susan's BS: Karen Brophy's on Day 4 and Day 3? 5? She testified two different days. It's from Karen that we know what really was going on. She's so careful with information. The opposite of Susan who aims to say nothing. These are good days to watch if you want to keep busy over the weekend! Also watch Woody's testimony.

[@tabbyrose73]

This trial is taking FOREVER.

[@lyndseylan1]

Prosecution, why are you not addressing the issue of Dan's garden being let go because he was working 2 jobs to get them out of debt? I would be tired too working all those hours and spend some time relaxing before the TV. Come on, you need to work harder and get this done.

[@sleuththewild]

The timeline might not work.? Or maybe someone could easily testify against it? Blackberries that bad must have taken some time to set in. But, it is important that Dan was planning to re-do the garden. He had no plans to sell the house. And why didn't Nancy take that job instead of having Dan take a second job? Or....A job at Walmart might have paid for her Starbucks habit.

[@laradesautel3013]

He DID just recently take that second job - good point! I don’t here they pointed out by prosecution.

[@GH-oi2jf]

Who would be the witness for Dan’s motivtion? The prosecutor could talk about that in closing arguments, I suppose. The jury can figure that out on their own.

[@goudagrishhdoe8925]

@@sleuththewild not many guys let their wife pick up the second job lol even if she was the source of the debt. Society expects the man to fix the problem and I’m sure that’s what Dan set out to do.

[@sleuththewild]

@@goudagrishhdoe8925 NB wasn't doing a whole lot of any kind of work: as she testified on stand, her SS was pitiful because she made hardly any money. It would have been pretty much a first job for her. I think it never occurred to her that she should be contributing. And she killed Dan for $$$$$; had to have her free lunch.

[@trucrimeonmytime6288]

The defense is desperate to come up with ways to defend her. I have a feeling after all these days of defense testimony the jury will make a decision in a few hours. Is there anyone watching who believes she is innocent?

[@janee9169]

I'm behind on watching but wanted to respond. I think jury could go either way, honestly. I don't think prosecution has made their case at all. They keep trying to make a big deal out of her trying to collect life insurance but she did nothing except what any normal beneficiary would do. I'm not saying there aren't issues and she very well could have, I'm just saying I don't think the prosecutor has been any more competent.

[@sleuththewild]

Did anyone else hear Gitchell call the defense attorneys the "two dames"? LMAO. He revealed his disdain for them.

[@barbiekat6352]

@ 59:32 🤣🤣🤣the witness pointed to the defense and then prosecution and said “both of these teams…” He’s way too young to use a term like that (unless he was maybe raised by his grandparents!) The only two people I ever heard refer to anyone as “dames” were my elderly father and Archie Bunker! 🥸

[@barbaragrove6097]

Who is Sarah? Do you mean Susan Estrada?

[@marynovak1782]

I heard teams…

[@sleuththewild]

@@barbaragrove6097 Yes, sorry. I mean Susan Estrada. I wrote it that way once, and changed it. Maybe I'm confusing something. I'll check.

[@sleuththewild]

@@barbaragrove6097 You are correct. I have changed all the Sarahs to Susans.

[@brianking2771]

I hate that water pitcher.

[@sleuththewild]

Reminder: no court tomorrow.

[@Rae_777]

46:44 this witness has a charming sense of humor… “shoot the… business” “admirably dry; aspirationally dry.”

[@sleuththewild]

Why do we have to hear about a woman walking a poodle as though this is potentially criminal behavior? IMO prosecution was great when he asked if there was a different place she could go than around the corner, i.e. into an apartment building. And defense PAID for this video analysis? Heck, this was another witness that the homeless guy was likely canning.

[@uttersolitude]

Homeless = bad is the cornerstone of their defense.

[@davidhughes5788]

Guilty af

[@leeprimeau7912]

If I hear the word “policy” one more time, I’m going to be sick.

[@rebeccareyes2493]

You know? You know? You know? Geeez is he nervous or what. My god 😅

[@NellPlotts]

The afternoon witnesses didn’t help Nancy. Calls between Nancy and Dan’s family after the murder, what does that prove? The guy collecting cans, a known person.

[@lyndseylan1]

They are just trying to give doubt to the jury

[@sleuththewild]

Defense shouldn't touch Dan's family with a 10-foot pole! All three were so sympathetic. They prolly have the whole court on their side except for the defense table.

[@sleuththewild]

Susan even looks like Nancy. Same face shape.

[@barbiekat6352]

When is Nancy going to be up?

[@GH-oi2jf]

Maybe next week.

[@barbaragrove6097]

Should be interesting

[@faithf.malcolm3739]

She has to testify because her defense has nothing😫

[@barbaragrove6097]

@@faithf.malcolm3739 can't image that her testimony will help her

[@kayleiasierra2251]

When does this trial resume? Never seen such sparatic days of a trial, & a defense such as this one. Has had plenty of time to put a case together though IMO would be a lost but in this case I wouldn't be surprised if there's an appeal due to the defense's lack of representation. Graduates could do better. JS .At the end of the day IMO she is totally guilty. What a horrific crime against this man. My heart, & prayers go out to the precious parents, & family of MS. Brody. Hope the defendant gets life without parole.

[@Debs440606]

Who does she think she is ? Is it more expensive to buy a policy as you get older, The answer is yes not umm, ok, umm, yeah er yeah I’m the um, ok, um - then has the cheek to say to the prosecution- I’m answering your question, correct?! I’d be like, no not correct, you’re ummm ing and aaaah ing, I’d like that you answer my question? Far too lenient with her !

[@kayleiasierra2251]

When is the trial going to continue

[@carolynbreeding8329]

Nancy so lazy she couldnt even make coffee. 😮

[@MaryContrary1]

Can someone explain why they are counting the number of calls to Karen ?

[@sleuththewild]

Nope. They're doing it because they're mean and can't think of anything else. Despicable. It seems to be they want to dispute Karen's testimony (Day 4?5?) that Nancy cut back on how much time she was spending with the senior Brophys after Dan's death. I guess they want to make like Karen is lying. If you re-watch Karen's testimony, I think you'll agree that this would be a DISASTROUS tactic, since you can't but hear her speak and feel for her and her loss. Karen's testimony also had plenty of acknowledgement that she might mis-remember things because of her age. It was built in. Why would you want to turn someone into a liar who's already put out there she might mis-remember? For all that, Karen was soooo careful and thoughtful about what she said. IMO It's not even important whether Nancy visited Karen less or called her less. It is true Nancy told them she didn't want their help getting the house together.

[@MaryContrary1]

@@sleuththewild excellent explanation! Thank you. It should be interesting to see what the defense comes up with tomorrow.

[@jenniferwaddell552]

OM!… That woman for the State is on my last nerve W/ that clearing of the throat thing she’s doin. Ugh 😩

[@misanthropiq]

Pure racism and Stereotyping. The defense is pathetic.

[@l.g.4075]

It would be hard for the defense to find a worse video “expert”

[@cellettegipson6042]

You know

[@myadhdlife4869]

I get what the defense is doing, but what do they say to the fact that she was seen on camera?

[@GH-oi2jf]

They can only explain that through the testimony of Nancy Brophy herself. We will see soon how she will try to explain it.

[@myadhdlife4869]

@@GH-oi2jf Is she expected to testify?

[@GH-oi2jf]

@@myadhdlife4869 - It has been reported that she intends to testify, but it isn’t certain until she actually takes the stand. I expect the prosecution will have tough questions ready for cross. If she does testify, but never discusses the video which seems to show her in the area at the right time, I’m not sure if they can ask her about it. They certainly can talk about it in closing arguments, though. If defense has offered no explanation for her whereabouts on that morning, the proscutor will have a field day. Why can’t she plausibly account for her presence in the area?

[@kelbayda2404]

Guy with curly hair about 3rd in : nobody knows that is why they are asking you. If they knew they would not ask you . Stop saying you know , I can predict nearly every one

[@jenniferwaddell552]

Seen in the comments bout pep bein confused to who Matthew G. is… He’s not Susan’s husband he’s another niece of Nancy name Sarah.

[@sleuththewild]

Nancy gifted Susan a car in return for 2 months work? Prolly to cover up for her.

[@willowv1220]

Since she was the only one doing it… don’t know what the landscapers did ….

[@willowv1220]

@@NLHester lol.. yes, well according to the niece she was the only one….

[@sleuththewild]

This is a stunning amount IMO. And Susan wasn’t the only one. Dan’s family was helping, the other writers, the landscapers… Susan did none of the packing or moving boxes. I don’t know anyone in the landscaping business or house cleaning who would make enough to buy a car in two months. IMO Susan got a car for bringing Nancy a Starbucks in bed every morning.

[@sleuththewild]

Operative words there…”according to the niece.” Everything is smoke and mirrors.

[@cadencechrome4783]

@@sleuththewild the car sure buys Nancy a gullible and loyal supporter.

[@sleuththewild]

Does anyone have any idea what the purpose of the forensic telephone guy is? Why would he be investigating Nancy's calls with Nathaniel, Karen, and Jack? It's just appalling to be intrusive with them. Note: they hired this guy just last week.

[@sleuththewild]

Aha! I think I've figured this out. This whole day of defense case should be put up against the testimony of Karen Brophy (Dan's mom, Day 4 and 5?). Karen said they saw less and less of Nancy after Dan's death. (It looked to me like that from the phone records, too, but I'm sure this will be spun a different way.) I guess defense is trying to make Karen and Jack out to be liars. This is a HORRENDOUSLY BAD idea. Karen is one of the most emotional witnesses to listen to. Her answers are well-considered and careful. Everyone will recognize her as a lovely person. Trying to impugn her credibility is just..... At any rate, look at Day 4 Afternoon. This is spellbinding.

[@tabbyrose73]

Lol. You do know they can trace a person's whereabouts via phone signals. And since she LIED to the police about where she was, and was caught on CCTV driving past the murder scene when she claimed she was home, it's a BIG DEAL. LOCK HER UP.

[@catherinearmstrong388]

Smoke and mirrors…

[@rsantella8008]

Defense dragging this out because they got nothin'. And they're putting on a weak case, IMO.

[@joyegray4450]

It may be because they’re nervous, but this man and his wife are the most poorly spoken adults I’ve listened to in a long time. It’s painful. 😆

[@sleuththewild]

Who's betting that prosecution used the day off (Friday) to execute a search warrant on the stuff in the niece's basement? And finished arrangements for Nancy's ex-bunkie to testify in the rebuttal?

[@alswedgin9274]

This comment has nothing to do with the case and it is coming from a european. Who TF does Not make sure they have the ability to make coffee when needed; relies on a coffee chain? We are talking about a society of laziness and convenience here. It is hard pressed to talk of the US as a 'society' though these days. Even the idea of 'community' uttered by Americans sounds laughable. When 'socialisme' is a hellhole trap in your opinion, don't speak of 'togetherness'. Every man/woman for her/him-self and if possible revert back to the 'Wild, wild West' and glorify the use of guns.. No other international super-power need concern about the US; y'all imploding as is; the world sees it.

[@PinkyakaAyannaj]

One year later your observation is even more true 😢

[@alswedgin9274]

A sad state of affairs.

[@sleuththewild]

Did anyone else notice that it was pretty obvious Susan rarely talked to Nancy in the months before Dan's death? Does that mean Susan just suddenly showed up? Is there any evidence Susan actually came to Oregon when she said she did? Overstreet doesn't seem to think the "friends and family" memorial happened.

[@barbaragrove6097]

Her testimony that she cleaned the whole yard up doesn't match the landscaper's testimony.

[@troyo5245]

Strange dude

[@XxfishpastexX]

45:30 - 45:50 startled

[@elisehorton2812]

???

[@doramendoza8482]

She never said time she would arrive such flaws