why am i paying tuition that goes to my professors when I'm always watching your videos. Literally every class. Physics, Biology, Statistics... You're saving my life lol
@dilbar09naz9 жыл бұрын
+Amanda Darby because professors are not really there to teach, their actual job is to do research but they also teach on the side, they don't have an education degree. but Sal teaches better than majority of high school teachers who have education degrees :/
@blownspeakersss7 жыл бұрын
+Slacker1221 That's not how it works. Virtually no professors have education degrees. As the previous person said, professors are supposed to be experts in their fields--not "teachers" per se. Like, at university, an actual economist (whose job it is to do academic research) will teach you economics, not an economics teacher. Ditto with any other subject.
@jeffconway87297 жыл бұрын
Yea, ironic that college costs increase when you can get at least 60 percent of your knowledge from the Internet, probably more. College costs should be going DOWN, not up. what a racket!
@blownspeakersss7 жыл бұрын
The availability of information on the internet is pretty much unrelated to college costs.
@brianm.43687 жыл бұрын
Yet Sal's opposition's best attack on khan's credibility is that they disagree with his definition of slope. Khan Academy, The Organic Chemistry Tutor, mathbff, and patrickjmt can literally fetch you a 3.9 to 4.0 gpa (university), unlike their live counterparts.
@tusharagarwal20402 жыл бұрын
Omgg, and most teachers and other KZbinrs too just give up at this point and simply say yeah this is the formula just remember. But after doing statistics for 3 years, finally I know that this is how it's derivedd. Oh God the satisfaction, thank you so much!
@bloomingelegant5907 жыл бұрын
finally, someone has given me hope for statistics
@KirtiDwivedi-q1m6 күн бұрын
So what are you doing at present
@shadosavage77553 жыл бұрын
This one was somewhat tough to absorb, but I'm loving this course. I feel like I'm learning exponentially faster than I ever did in school/college.
@PerceeP92710 жыл бұрын
this whole thing is mewtwo! 7:56
@samuel94city6 жыл бұрын
Dude you are amazing. This was actually funny. Pokemon Fan!
@belzhang57454 жыл бұрын
Samuel Augustin plus one🙋
@whitec19818 жыл бұрын
where were you when i was bombing stats class in 2001-2002 Ha ha man has education come a long way!!!!
@bigrobbyd.68059 жыл бұрын
Dude! That is amazing. Thanks for the help!
@mouradbarakat12310 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sal. You are driving colleges out of business :)
@jakereason80957 жыл бұрын
Note that the derived forms will only work for calculating population variance and not sample variance since you wouldn't be able to substitute the arithmetic mean one of the expanded polynomial terms; I had to learn this the hard way.
@nitinraturi63747 жыл бұрын
Jake Reason this will work with both sample and population variance. You just have to derive the formula for sample variance just like he did in the video.
@Ihatenicknames114 жыл бұрын
This is very helpfull, I watched all the statistics videos and love the topic now Thank you so much, you have no idea how much you have helped me
@koby93404 жыл бұрын
did you graduated by now xD ?
@Ihatenicknames14 жыл бұрын
@@koby9340 hahaha yes! I work as a software engineer now and am very happy with the job :D
@koby93404 жыл бұрын
@@Ihatenicknames1 Congrats man so happy for you
@alenjose39034 жыл бұрын
10 years. Feels strange.
@nocturnalvisionmusic2 жыл бұрын
@@Ihatenicknames1 that's nice man congrats :)
@shazaduh15 жыл бұрын
The standard formula requires that all of the samples be involved in each new calculation. This is a very inefficient use of computational power and memory, but with above formula, running tally is kept while moving through the signal. This is good for microprocessor or FPGA in DSP design.
@orpheus166415 жыл бұрын
I highly reccommend this guys videos, he's VERY good at explaining things simply, which is not easy when stats is concerned :-D
@Czathero11 жыл бұрын
You are now officially my review for my Stats class.
@aknavychic223410 жыл бұрын
I love these videos....they are soooo much help! THANK YOU!!!!
@soumyonayak Жыл бұрын
Exactly the video I was searching for.
@konopong15 жыл бұрын
mu squared times the sum of ones in the numerator comes from the fact that you add mu squared N times, which is simply Nmu**2. After you square the original variance numerator you need to sum each of the three terms from 1 to N. Hope this helps.
@MrNicorodriguezD14 жыл бұрын
I've got a question... If I have the size of the population, but I just need the variance of a sample, e.g: (N=60, n=10), then I should use n-1? thnx!:)
@mapa50002 жыл бұрын
Fantastic !!! Thank you
@THE16THPHANTOM13 жыл бұрын
@SuperRockstar206 doesn't matter how young you are you can do this if you can add,subtract, divide and multiply, and watch the play list. long live you-tube...and this guy that does this.
@karabaines591811 жыл бұрын
I sat through so many lectures last year trying to understand all this stuff and this guy has made it sooo easy !! Thank you !!!
@miamirealestatetube9 жыл бұрын
thank you!
@haappyone12 жыл бұрын
noone else can teach like you . You are a great teacher. keep it up. It's really suprising to see three dislikes for this video.
@GabrielConstantinides9 жыл бұрын
Thank you for such an amazing video, really well explained.
@tusharmodi98837 жыл бұрын
I don't understand the intention of making this video the concept of variance was pretty much clear in last video and this video had confused me more. so keep it simple and straightforward
@amber18627 жыл бұрын
tushar modi You've probably figured it out by now, but just in case someone's reading this and thinking the same; a lot of statistics is done algorithmically using computers, so working out the variance with the new ways presented in this video could potentially reduce the time it takes to calculate the variance with a computer, and if you're dealing with a huge amount of data, that's significant. When you write computer code, sometimes you have to write more 'messy' code upfront to actually force the computer to perform less calculations by doing it in the exact order you told it to, making the program more efficient. Computers don't care about messy code, all they care about is instructions and the order of said instructions.
@tamaleseason14 жыл бұрын
oh thank you so much!!!!!!seriously i have a stats final in 7 hours and you helped me out so much thank you!!!you make it so easy!
@alenjose39034 жыл бұрын
did u pass?
@chetankv72187 жыл бұрын
Hi, I have tried to still deduce variance formula, however seems i am seeing there is an issue in this deduction. Could you please help me understand it Currently we have below equation variance= sum(xi)^2/N - mean^2 what i did was for the first part sum(xi)^2/N i multiplied and divide by 'N', so it looked something like below: N*sum(xi)^2/N^2 --> N* (sum(xi)/N)^2 --> sum(xi)/N is mean formula So, Variance = (N* mean^2) - mean^2 --> i took mean^2 as a common term Variance = (N-1) mean^2 --> this formula seems to be not giving the result i want
@LegoEddy6 жыл бұрын
Hey, I hope this answer still helps you out: You have to watch out whether you compute sum(xi^2) or sum(xi)^2, because they are not the same. That means that you have to start with variance= sum(xi^2)/N - mean^2, and then you will not be able to transform the first term into the mean formula.
@wally9y912 жыл бұрын
thanks, i know it right now which i dont understand woth my statistics's notes.
@lorenasiu311314 күн бұрын
Thank you so much, I hate learning formulas without understanding
@cheesiechess36562 жыл бұрын
But I have even more formulas for the variance which is confusing. I have unbiased estimate of population variance: (N-1)/N * s^2. And I also have the: Unbiased estimate of Var(X (bar)) = s^2/n (1-n/N). My problem is mainly that I don't understand what Var(X bar) means (I cannot write a bar over X on youtube comment).
@rewindvampire665 жыл бұрын
I think I like the other way more because this one was a little harder for me to grasp
@lattethebunbun5 жыл бұрын
sorry to bother!! I am wondering why when you facetored out mew squared it is left with a 1 in there? thank you!!
@bigcheesetaste3 жыл бұрын
beautifully explained!
@niranjanchakrabhavi86017 жыл бұрын
While writing the equation of variance, please divide the term by N as soon as you write the numerator. It's annoying to see the denominator left out.
@manfredmichael_3ia0973 жыл бұрын
Its 1 am, and 8:00 opened my eyes!
@Gruemoth4 жыл бұрын
the pixel quality becomes so banal due to the colors and the simplicity of the explanation. Math is beautiful
@ninjajesus8114 жыл бұрын
@yynotx I still don't understand why the third sigma term is multiplied times 1. Why would that cause the moo to become it's coefficient? And if you're multiplying it by 1, why even put the 1 there?
@bahareomrani10398 жыл бұрын
amazing video, may I ask you what is your software? thanks
@nabildatascience74223 жыл бұрын
love you khan good explanation
@PressStartLetsPlay12 жыл бұрын
This guys a genius.
@shivamchoudhary16813 жыл бұрын
Can we do the same thing for sample Variance?
@rebel733214 жыл бұрын
Thanx, I like your way of teaching
@aozcakir215 жыл бұрын
watched on Jan 04, Thanks
@ezramagiya85818 жыл бұрын
Wow it is indeed helpful
@piyushmajgawali16115 жыл бұрын
mean of squares - square of mean
@itubie9 жыл бұрын
There is a random variable X with its mean 10. Moreover, we learn that the mean of X^2 is 26. What is standard deviation of this random variable?
@junmarkz4 жыл бұрын
Just square root the variance to get the standard deviation
@chandraveersinghsolanki83719 ай бұрын
this is the tutor I’ve been taught by
@MatmarSpace Жыл бұрын
The video may be 240p but it explains the topic in 4K.
@chaosui31696 жыл бұрын
This tells var(x)=E[x^2]-E[x]^2
@DogeMcShiba5 жыл бұрын
Indeed. To anyone reading this, E[x] is called the "expected value" of a sample/population, which is pretty much the equivalent of the mean. It's essentially just a shorter way of writing it instead of all the Sigma signs and such, since you can write e.g. E[x^2] which is the mean of the data points squared.
@FakeMath30005 жыл бұрын
But wheres the divisor (N and N^2) though?
@UltraRik8 жыл бұрын
7:58 This whole thing is MewTwo
@krishhsingh40344 жыл бұрын
copy -_-
@UltraRik4 жыл бұрын
huh seems like a lot of people heard the same pun
@jijie1335 жыл бұрын
very good.
@backstudy2715 жыл бұрын
This is beacause the sigma applied to everything inside the brackets, including the constant u. (u is a constant because there is no x-sub-i to contribute to the sum).
@MrJonPala12 жыл бұрын
Would sample variance end in a (n-1)squared?
@MrsIssy201010 жыл бұрын
Omg I love this. Thank you
@Enviousful14 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't also been ... -2*u divided by N + u ..., because it is the whole formula divided by N? Hoping an answer
@mrcool4uall6 жыл бұрын
Can anyone comment on this please? Even I have the same doubt.
@SpacedFiction11 жыл бұрын
Mew and Mew 2. Gotta catch em all.
@imaginaryunit.11 жыл бұрын
7:58 Mewtwo! :D
@DiogoQNT4 жыл бұрын
LOVE YOU BRO!!
@dfsfklsj12 жыл бұрын
Ahhh!!! I totally see it now! How can I forget to look at the sigma sign! Anyway, thanks for correcting me, I'm a freshman in high school so... :P
@yalnayal5 жыл бұрын
mindblown
@sarveshingale Жыл бұрын
thanks
@Carlosenzone10 жыл бұрын
mewtwo
@davialbuquerque49645 жыл бұрын
Have you already watched the new Pokemon movie?
@krishhsingh40344 жыл бұрын
hol' up
@LearningTheBasics0018 жыл бұрын
seriously you will be writing my final exam for me
@ConnieWEN-051211 ай бұрын
amazing!is it magic? no it is maths!
@garlicgirl31498 жыл бұрын
For a second I thought you were speaking a foreign language then you redeemed yourself in the end.
@frenchmike Жыл бұрын
0:07
@dman2218012 жыл бұрын
No he didn't; he simplified it from Sum(M^2) from i=1 to N, which (from summation rules) he brings out the constant to the front so: M^2*Sum(1) from i = 1, to N. Sum(1) from i=1 to N is just N (you have N 1s). So you get M^2*N/N ==> M^2
@jamesleem.d.74426 жыл бұрын
At 12:13 check how you pronounce the verb "iterate". "Eye-Ter-Ate" ? I don't think so.
@zakariaibrahim67814 жыл бұрын
Why do you divide by N not N-1???
@Ryan라이언3 жыл бұрын
why is mu^2sigma 1 to N = mu^2 N? and not mu^2? can some one explain it for me :(
@THE16THPHANTOM13 жыл бұрын
big boy mathematics. (i think a kid in primary school can do this if they watched these videos.)
@InMooseWeTrust15 жыл бұрын
What is the point of doing this? I was confused enough with the standard formula.
@tautologicalnickname11 жыл бұрын
7/59 MEWTWO!! XD
@kariakichernocherno22742 жыл бұрын
The formula looks more easier
@frito9479111 жыл бұрын
Mewtwo 7:58
@dfsfklsj12 жыл бұрын
Ummmm. M^2 is a constant, and it is totally inllegal to time it by N. The final formula should be m^2/n instead of m^2. I think you made a big mistake!
@alyaasaad4333 жыл бұрын
👍🏻
@Sonnett712 жыл бұрын
Pokemon fans - check out 7:59
@jimmyzsan87025 жыл бұрын
SS = sigma x^2 -( sigma x)/ N. sigma ^2= SS/N this is easier, yours seems wrong from those multiple methods
@jamesmclean87514 жыл бұрын
You were purely flexing in the video.
@lovedog4950711 жыл бұрын
This stuff makes my head hurt.
@VleerLab11 жыл бұрын
lol that's what I was thinking
@adbasdbasdkasdja72467 жыл бұрын
awesome but really shitty quality.
@shekelboi9 ай бұрын
And what am I supposed to do with the last equation? 💀
@MrFernandoBedoya11 жыл бұрын
I have the same question. I think he make a mistake.
@gopalb1675 жыл бұрын
I love you na raja
@deadboy00014 жыл бұрын
i failed on statistics -.-" lol
@mayuri39648 жыл бұрын
So confusing 😞
@sulandelemere6 жыл бұрын
I was doing good until I hit this video which just confused me. Maybe have to come back to this later. I think too much is assumed of the learner in this one.