King James Onlyism and The Book of Revelation (1-20-2013)

[@brb1050]

Thank you for this teaching Joe.

[@Bought4aPrice]

Praise the Lord, this is some genuine meat for any believers walk with Jesus. I thank God for this pastor, his ministry, and the faithfulness kept in being a Shepard for the flock. I pray the Lord uses this to bless others like He has with me 💜 abide in Christ brothers and sisters, love you 🙏

[@Gloriagal78]

What a timeless message. If I lived in Simi Valley, I would most definitely attend this church.

[@ompaloompa4970]

This is a blessing for those who want to know the truth and search things out . Thank you pastor Joe 🙏, I was not knowledgeable about this, but now I've connected the dots!

[@mandygainey312]

Amen!!!!!!!!! Thank you, Pastor Joe!!!!!!! God bless you!!

[@davec.3129]

King James Bible is awesome

[@antonyschwarz8749]

baptists r real bible thumpers in general , no love in general very few without Love we r nothing xx love ya Brother from Sydney Australia xxx Halleluyah

[@allthingsthroughhim3856]

Excellent teaching once again Joe. Thank you for being as objective as possible and being honest with scripture. I'm afraid many pastors and Christians are missing that today.

[@Airik1111bibles]

I'm no kjv onlyest but older doesn't always mean more accurate esp with God's people passing down a majority that agree. I know Revelation has some messed up readings but not enough throughout to toss it under the buss . The Nkjv is a good alternative but honestly I love the Ole KJV ...

[@voiceofreason1208]

I don't have a dog in this fight although I do use the KJV, but the big deal I've heard from KJV only types is that more current versions have changed words that remove the deity of Jesus. I've seen side by side comparison, i admit I do not remember which verses, but their argument was very compelling. My take is more along brother Joe's personally.

[@kari7398]

❤

[@beautifuldisaster5920]

KJV is my favorite yet I do not agree that KJV is the only true version. The KJV only types loose so much by keeping so narrow minded.

[@j-rad2613]

There is quite a few good translations we have only gotten better at it since 1611. King james used that translation (which is my favorite) as part of his political agenda. It is not the 1 true version there are older englosh bibles such as the Geneva and others. The apocrypha was in the 1611 king james as well, these books have been rejected now. They all have slight mistranslation like the word hell in the KJV is used to describe sheol, gehenna, and tartarus(abyss) howvevr it is 3 different worda in the greek or hebrew. KJV is amazing translation and very accurate, but the fact of the matter is the NASB is the most accurate word for word from the old texts. Remember recent discoveries such as the dead sea scrolls and other ancient texts has further provided accuracy since 1611. I use KJV and NKJV, i also think the NASB and ESV are good. I think as long as you stick with word for word translations and stay away from thought for thought like the awful NIV and stay even further away from paraphrase translations you should be ok. A strongs concordance can really help find the original hebrrw and greek words used and their understandings. Stay away from study bibles too mans interpretation of the scriptures. God bless hope this helps anyone questioning translations.

[@antonyschwarz8749]

yes true bless ya from Sydney Australia

[@MarpleZoss]

Scribes will try to take away your faith in Gods word. Without an innerant text guys like Schimmel have become your authority and not Gods word.

[@csantana9]

The Lord led me to scripture in my New King James bible to distinctly speak to me in my situation, so i know that He does not use 'one' specific translation of His word.

[@j-rad2613]

There is quite a few good translations we have only gotten better at it since 1611. King james used that translation (which is my favorite) as part of his political agenda. It is not the 1 true version there are older englosh bibles such as the Geneva and others. The apocrypha was in the 1611 king james as well, these books have been rejected now. They all have slight mistranslation like the word hell in the KJV is used to describe sheol, gehenna, and tartarus(abyss) howvevr it is 3 different worda in the greek or hebrew. KJV is amazing translation and very accurate, but the fact of the matter is the NASB is the most accurate word for word from the old texts. Remember recent discoveries such as the dead sea scrolls and other ancient texts has further provided accuracy since 1611. I use KJV and NKJV, i also think the NASB and ESV are good. I think as long as you stick with word for word translations and stay away from thought for thought like the awful NIV and stay even further away from paraphrase translations you should be ok. A strongs concordance can really help find the original hebrrw and greek words used and their understandings. Stay away from study bibles too mans interpretation of the scriptures. God bless hope this helps anyone questioning translations.

[@heathers4961]

@@csantana9 Me too!!!!!

[@jay-d8g3v]

@@csantana9 Amen, I started out with ESV. Of course I went from that to KJV and now NASB1995 for a daily reader