Klee Irwin - Why Use an 8-Dimensional Shape to Describe 3-Dimensional Reality?

[@coole9639]

I like how he had to pretty much back track through his mind to understand how this concept made sense to him in the first place. Dimensional thinking

[@joanchaffinbawcom5722]

As a lay person who has been interested in physics since the 1970s, I find these theories exciting. Please keep uploading videos of your thought processes.

[@acesman111]

They aren’t theories. It’s reality

[@chrislewis6393]

Don't ever say Ur a lay person Ur God!

[@HeyItsTheKellys]

Here from Shawn Ryan Show w Billy Carson

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

If you've watched this video and still need more science, check out our new film Hacking Reality! kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHvMZJKwo9JqkKc Is there an 8-dimensional "engine" behind our universe? Join Marion Kerr on a fun, visually exciting journey as she explores a mysterious, highly complex structure known simply as 'E8'--a weird, 8-dimensional object that for some, strange reason, appears to encode within it all of the particles and forces of our 3-dimensional universe.

[@ryanh2772]

Trippy.. I was just imagining essentially everything he says in this video while driving in my car. Decided to do a KZbin search asking “do atoms exist in another dimension” randomly click on this video after scrolling a bit and this guy literally starts describing what I was imaging. Wild synchronicity.

[@mismass7859]

I’m so amazed by Klee and his creative thinking, somewhere deep inside I feel he’s right even though I only understand 1% of what he says, mostly because of all the technical terminology, I get the principle but would love to hear his thoughts translated into something a bit more digestible for the less initiated.

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

Try our films What is Reality? and Hacking Reality on our channel. They're our emergence theory broken down for the layperson. :)

[@davidlopan123]

@@QuantumGravityResearch who can I talk to from your organization, I had a couple of questions???? Seriously!

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

Keep your eyes peeled for our new E8 documentary - coming soon! Catch our last doc, What is Reality? here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rWHdpZ9_dr6Hebc

[@chuckfarley2764]

I'm curious what the "hyper-vector or hyper-projector" is conceptually. I have also considered if we were merely information on the event horizon of a higher dimensional blackhole being holographically projected through the singularity to appear as a physical universe. My biggest problem with this idea is how the information is being projected into a lower dimensional form. What is projecting and what exactly is being projected by it?

[@marvelxavier]

You r very smart . You figure it out . Ask me a question and I’ll answer .

[@DeVaughnDawn]

We are the ones projecting....

[@pho.phonic]

@@DeVaughnDawn Exactly, consciousness is a fundamental force just like Gravity, EM, Strong and Weak.

[@exit13mika]

A shadow known to us as reality

[@spalkin]

I like how you keep all the real discussion and explanations.

[@subhransu7810]

really loved it ,the concept of 4d quasicrystal encompassing more information than the parent object is really mindboggling.

[@thedude666]

5:55 Well one might say that was an odd break in the 8th wall.

[@miracleshappen4483]

Are we as humans a projection of something in a much higher dimension? And if so, according to Klee, can we obtain information about our "E8 counterpart" just by studying ourselves? 😁😊💖

[@t-pentylchloride1921]

It’s “heaven” that’s talked about in the Bible, it can describe everything the Bible tries to represent

[@ashbyhowitt9329]

Technically that's what Buddhe did & experienced pure bliss/mystery

[@ericw6081]

There are a few videos on quantum gravity researches website that might clear up some of your questions if you’re still unsure. To do with our consciousness being a key factor. And basically any possible version of everything, exists. Including every possible version of you. Of me. And so on. There is a code that creates our universe. And all things conscious make the variables that appear as random variants in the code. And our inverse is a projection of a higher dimension. All dimensions existing simultaneously. But perceived differently. Some possibly not at all. It’s overwhelming to try to comprehend or explain.

[@TheRealFranc]

Excellent food for thought in this video. You mentioned "unpack" "recover", coming from an engineering background, this sounds like you are trying to say "reverse engineer", this has been one of humanity's biggest conundrums which was not possible to reach until we have exhausted understanding of all the parts of the whole in science and then also see to it why we can't go any further. Worthy of mention is that we have exhausted search efforts at extremely expensive proton colliders/accelerators such as CERN. Historically, we have never really tried to "deeply" or "hypothetically" reverse-engineer the process of life, our own existence along with our collective interpretation of emergence down to the organized rigid crystalline structure to the extent that you guys (Klee et.al.) are doing. Using the child as a product of a mother and father analogy will be the way to move forward with advanced understanding and eventually unification of physics and subatomic physics. Everything, even knowledge of things or "gnosis" emerges with time, given the right environment, circumstances and sequences (patterns) and the right people at the right time. Also, "reality isn't 8-dimensional", I agree, it's not a good way to use in describing reality. Reality is superfluous, always moving, appearing and reappearing, dispersing and rejoining or regathering in clusters (clusters of thought). Once you bring in water or any other fluous substance and use it to describe how the E8 behaves when it meets such fluous substances (which appear liquid in its behavior-observed or simulated in computer) then we might be able to describe the mechanics of "reality" as we have come to understand its many parts and universal scales today. I think we all now know (or some have always known) and can all agree that everything unifies with one another at some or many universal points in the scale of things. We are back at the problem of how do we communicate it all in a more simplified language. Perhaps our search is now in how do we devise a way to "bridge" everything in let's say, one big complete image or diagram. It's as if we almost have to make adjustments to our current system of language and especially that of mathema'tics. But as I see it, there is still much nailing down of space and time before we make huge leaps forward. One solution is to continue to seek spiritually that which we long for while in pursuit of work/efforts to unify physics or come to closer in understanding and discerning our spiritual nature. I hope this makes sense as I am running short on time. I may come back to edit this comment if time allows.

[@dcb1138]

Wow. Sounds like a book worthy topic. No joke

[@shankerbhandari3936]

You are diverting the sprite of the matter only on one focused point. Don’t do anything sit idle and wait for proper time to come when god desires. No, we humans being have curiosity from the childhood periods so let it work, conclusion with be decided later on in future.

[@DelmarToad]

Shaping matter in the time domain increasingly becomes possible?

[@azizel6356]

But why stop at E8 and not say that it is a projection of a higher dimension, that itself is a projection of a higher dimension etc... The question asked at 5:15 was on point I think and that's exactly what I'm missing. Why define a lower dimensional quasi-cristal by its eight dimension and specifically this one ? At 7:03 Klee Irwin talks about someone seeing the projection of a cube in 2D and then going either in higher or lower dimensions. But then he says the quasi-cristal is a 3D shadow of an 8th dimension. Why did he choose eight or stopped at eight when looking at higher dimensions of our 3D world ?

[@byronrudnik2621]

Reminds me a lot of Gnostic thought.. The 8D quasicrystal could be the Demiurge, and the projector could be the Pleroma.

[@realScottThomas]

No. Demiurge is 6th dimension. The real God is 8th dimension. Angels are 7th. God sent his best angel to lower dimension as punishment.

[@ernestoduenas2466]

@@realScottThomasyou cant be more wrong jesus was never an angel neither was his sacrifice a punishment neither god is in the 8 dimention cause theres also more dimentions youre mixing things totally wrong sorry to said that

[@realScottThomas]

@@ernestoduenas2466 okay put God in highest dimension and angel in one lower and demigurge in a lower one then that.

[@andrewsparkinson1566]

Thanks Klee. Father intuition is telling me your E8 crystal lattice is the code to reflect how ones visual cortex interprets the visual dimension, cool. So that could make E8 crystals the fundamental structure of our 3D matrix yeah?

[@priestadam7337]

😴

[@BoshyJoshy96]

Ahhhh so emergence! The product is great than the sum of the parts! Great video :)

[@chrisglover2697]

The real holy grail of physics

[@MasonClay]

I love listening to Klee. He makes physics clear to dummies like me.

[@JBSCORNERL8]

He’s not talking physics. He’s talking the foundation of reality

[@MasonClay]

@@JBSCORNERL8 Yup, Unification physics. Thanks

[@JasonHussell]

So imagine sitting in the movie theatre the father is the light/information source the mother is the lense and our dimension and reality is what’s on the screen

[@_casg]

I’ve been wanting to ask about the e8 lattice but near a black whole. How does that look like ? Does the discretization of the voxels interlock beyond their limiters ? Since black holes rip space time. What does the Planck scale space time look like in the center of a black hole basically.

[@STONECOLDET944]

Near, spacetime is quantised, with higher dimensions being small and non linear, being commutative, then you have to make a metaphysical leap as to what those tetrahedra are why they exist and how they arrange themselves

[@Beerbatter1962]

This is very interesting. The statement about how the upper dimensional objects are actually much simpler makes sense. After all, scientist I believe feel that the "Theory of Everything" should be a very simple object or construct. The complexity of our Standard Model and other models are so because of our ignorance on how to project our 4-D world back onto the upper dimensional object. I will keep following these geometric ideas of how the Universe might work.

[@theokapanadze]

Since reality is the information we might find coded information about dimension in the ancient languages e.g. according to Georgian language the sun have 9 eyes

[@franh9046]

So what is the father (projecting) entity? Consciousness originating in 8D or higher that "illuminates" &/or "actualizes" the quasi-crystalline structures in the lower dimensions?

[@rebelangel8227]

Does this mean that that the 8th dimension is the graphics processor of this universe?

[@peppe77ish]

It is The Architect,, of The selfregulating code that E-8 is.. Universe is built on geometri and frequences... That are non solid. With perfekt finetuned geometrical frequences it builded the bildning blocks of everything... Light.. Hydrogen, helium carbon and so on...E- 8 is an selfregulating code witch probably keeps gravity in low force so our form of life keps our particles in place.. We are after all mainly made out space and some stardust,, how can consciousness emerge from materia made from materia that are the same materia that exists everywhere?

[@Errorpotentialspam]

It may be beneficial to reverse the metaphor of father and mother, because in Hinduism there is shiva and Shakti. Shakti is the action, the energy, through her shiva maintains the universe. I know it’s a random comment but I just think there is a beautiful framework already existing to metaphorically being this idea into the grasp of ordinary people

[@astrophonix]

Quasicrystal = protomolecule?

[@bobwerner6512]

Lased light is used to make the shadow?. Just me thinking here not sure if I am right or wrong

[@IT-hj2wb]

Question : How are 4 , 5 etc dimensions geometric objects( ex hypercube or 600cell) linked to higher dimensions from physics ( ex. string theory 10 or 11 dimensions)? According to physics, fourth dimension isnt conceivable by observation but takes place in the subatomic level ( it can be linked with time , providing different possibilities at the same spatial dimension). In the fifth dimension, we would see a world slightly different from our own that would give us a means of measuring the similarity and differences between our world and other possible ones. In the sixth, we would see a plane of possible worlds, where we could compare and position all the possible universes that start with the same initial conditions as this one and so on until the 11th.. So how is your reference to higher dimensions linked to that one theorised by physicists or are they completely different things? Anyone knows? Thanks

[@mr.mayhem5438]

It's crazy he's talking straight magick

[@Demosophist]

To have a shadow projection requires a light source and something that negates the effects of the light source to cause contrast, so both the light source and the shadow itself are aspects of the quasi-crystal. Is there a way to include this manifold concept in your theory?

[@Jacco0]

This is a false assumption. The idea of a shadow projection is just to visualise the concept of that you can describe something with math and geometry from a different dimension. This way you create an "image".

[@vjc1630]

8:00 yes, don't leave out the "projector". When you see how it self projects you will understand.

[@Ed-pv6ke]

So the entropy runs up and down the scale proofing one and other?

[@kimberlysteph3877]

Klee, fascinating! How about TL=MC^2 "C" to help along as far as explaining.? Just a thought.

[@albertwang5974]

My question is: if we describe or represent the physical word with this 8-dimensional object, 3-dimensions can be treated as x, y, z coordinates, what's the rest 5 dimensions mean? is it time, acceleration, ... ?

[@johnsanchez6263]

Like holographic principal or something but with more?

[@charliecoppinger]

I'm a complete novice when it comes to physics, but I have a question regarding this video: during the explenation Klee gives around the 3rd dimension being more complex than the higher dimensions due to the fact it's a product of emergence from two co-efficients (the 'mother' and 'father'), would that not insinuate that the 2nd dimension is more complex than the 3rd dimension, following the same logic?

[@elastiq1704]

What I got from it is that he says that the lower dimension(3D) is a richer mathematical “object.” Not more complex. Due to it being a projection it holds information of the angle from the projector to the “mother crystal” and the information of the mother crystal itself. That’s why it would be better to study the quasicrystal and why he seems to say that word a thousand times.

[@3boodae749]

He could’ve used the example of being a 2 dimensional character appearing 3D to us as simply a recording of him talking to us on KZbin.

[@brunster64]

So is the “hyper vector” in the same dimension (8th) as E8? Or in a higher dimension?

[@ta4710]

so is 3 dimensional reality a fractal of 8 dimensional reality?

[@zachchamblee4094]

So what if you took an 8 dimensional crystal and cast light through it to a 5D quartz crystal and the shadow as you rotated it would be the guidline for AI to write the code. Even more so if you vibrated it at a certain frequency so you'd need something like a VR lens to calibrate the image so it could be seen. Man the mushrooms talking to me 😂 Yall dont know nothing i know im onto something here

[@Spirit-dg5xi]

What is a 3 simplex? Tetrahedron. Why is this 3D shape specifically chosen as the symbol to represent the language of particles and their energies and transformations?

[@Levon9404]

It is easy say something whatever it comes in our mind, you can attached mathematical formula to prove it to, however we have to also prove physical existence all dimensions, the only way you can do that you have to see what is visible and what is not visible, we have total of 6 dimensions 3 visible and 3 non visible.

[@priestadam7337]

Levon Guyumjian

[@zaxxonianmechpilot8883]

Would the hyper vector work in the other direction? A single one dimension, plus time. Gives birth to two dimensions. Plus time etc. As though the one dimensional universal expansion, (time) is the driving force of all? Emergence from gauging over time.

[@zaxxonianmechpilot8883]

I just realised. I'm describing a constitute part of the same thing.

[@lynneperkins494]

What is there to extrapolate? You already have the eight dimensional object mapped or you wouldn’t be able to project it. Why take 8d math, represent it in 3D, and use that representation to extrapolate presumably the same 8d math you started with? Do you just like the pattern it makes or something? Also if it exists in 8d then why would combining it with whatever function you used to transform it add anything of substance?

[@elastiq1704]

He doesn’t answer the question in my opinion so i’ll take a crack. We use the 8th dimension to explain our reality because when the quasicrystal of the 8th dimension is perceived by humans it is in 4D. We can then project that shape into three dimensions which is then a complex combination of tetrahedrons that can only be arranged in a certain pattern because they are geometric shapes. That pattern is what he defines as the “code.” Now in theory (at least in my mind) the quasicrystal of the 16th? dimension could be projected to 8D and then perceived by 6 dimensional creatures/life forms to explain their reality. Someone correct me or let me know if this is somewhat comprehending emergence theory.

[@finn9000]

That's the right way of explaining it, thanks for clarifying

[@garysutherland7004]

Also, 8D is our limitation. From the 9th dimension to infinite, as he shares in another video, the reflections are infinite. 8D is as far as you can go where the reflections are not infinite, and therefore differences are distinguishable. Also, an observer from a 4th dimension will see a 3D dimension in it's entirety. There is nothing in the 3rd dimension that cannot be observed from the 4th dimension. That is why we want our observations to come from 4d. Otherwise, you're only seeing part of the picture.

[@erik-ic3tp]

@@garysutherland7004, which video?

[@time-mechanics]

The 2d r, is designed for the system to work, 4d aka in 2d how do you objectively navigate or see a corner or start turning corners..... on a flat surface? See the 4d rotating vid/image pls see now and imagine it. Flat > inside > flat.

[@anwarulmamoon4299]

How Quasicristal is produced or what does it mean "projection" from 8 dimensional cristal or E8 lattice?

[@BrightBlueJim]

Projection is just a mechanism for reducing the number of dimensions. Projections are used for example, to represent locations on a spherical planet onto a flat map. Projection is also what cameras (and eyes) do, reducing 3D objects to 2D images.

[@____uncompetative]

Mathematically every conceivable projection exists simultaneously. We happen to observe our specific shadow universe from one specific projection angle. Other exouniverses would have different physics.

[@iankennedy9462]

Love you guys, keep up the good work

[@wordprocessbrian4497]

I see a radius that gets stretched slightly from baseline during each perpendicular equalizing force process . two things in contrast, mechanical and abstract, with the observer as the guage. no one dimension, no four dimensions

[@priestadam7337]

word process brian

[@endofdaysbroadcast8486]

How about the 12th dimension instead of the 8th?

[@kokomanation]

We see 2 dimensions like frames but we feel we are in a 3 dimensional space that we experience from a first person perspective until we die and that applies to each individual animals also

[@kharanshu2854]

But why project from 8 dimensions to 4 dimensions? Why not from 8 dimensions to 3 dimensions directly?

[@____uncompetative]

You wouldn't get their language of tetrahedrons.

[@kacemrochd6425]

It is expected from the unification of the Newtonian and the cosmic dynamics that there is a need for an additional potential called the dual Newtonian potential and a higher dimentional isotropic flat space - time to account for the solar system dynamics. The expected space - time is composed with 9 space dimensions and 4 time dimensions. It is expected on the other hand from non-zero value of the speed of light at the esrth's position and the coincidence between the center of observable universe and the earth's position the existence of Multiverse gathering 419 universes of the same mass and the same size as the observable universe. We think that the the complex Lie group E8 of dimension 248 can be considered as a simple real Lie group of dimension 496. This means that we can serve with the E8 Lie group of dimension 496 as a fundamental structure of the Multiverse gathering exactly 496 universes including 419 elements inward and 77 elements outward relative to the earth's position in the Multiverse.

[@jasparevarhart1332]

how do i get on this..?

[@maximiliancrea7184]

i like how i thought i could kinda possible partially understand any of this.

[@SenorSiesta]

This is fine but and good but doesn't explain why or how I am so stupid?

[@imaginaryuniverse632]

I enjoy your posts a lot but I missed the answer to the question on this one. I'm also interested in an explanation of how you translate from one dimension to another and where did you find the initial pattern to use for translating. I think that the Flower of Life is the blue print for reality btw.

[@garysutherland7004]

Yes, they found it through what is observable in reality. The reason an 8D is projected is because we cannot perceive a 4d object. We need to project an 8D because the result of what we are able to see is an accurate 4D projections. The reason you want to create a 4D projections is that everything in the 3rd dimension is perceivable from the 4th dimension. Meaning, from the 4th dimension, there are no shadows, we could see every single reflection of light off a 3d object from the 4th dimension. So, they create a 4th dimensional observer, and that enables a clear picture of anything 3d.

[@maxlife9721]

AWESOME....NOW I GET IT

[@rafqueraf]

i find a littler odd how physics can say 2d or 1d without being conservative but saying a dimension higher than the 3 dimension as a real dimension is a like a taboo :D. I'm not considering time as being the 4 dimension :d

[@BrightBlueJim]

And you are absolutely right about that. But the reason that nothing is lost in the 8D->3D projection, is that the data are inherently 3D. The 8D representation just makes the math more elegant. When you rotate something in 8D space, you have eight different axes of rotation available, which can express much higher degree equations than 3D can easily show. That is, when you project 8D-rotated objects onto a lower order (4D, 3D, or even 2D), phenomena that can be difficult to describe can appear as simple shapes in a particular rotation. To demonstrate this visually, imagine a photograph, being rotated in 3D space. The photograph itself remains two dimensional, no matter how you rotate it. So while rotating it will distort the shapes of objects in the photograph, you don't lose any information when you project that back down to 2D, unless you choose a rotation that views the photograph perfectly edgewise. So how would this be useful? Well, if there an ellipse in the photograph, it is always possible to rotate the photograph in such a way that the ellipse appears as a circle, for example. The 3D rotation of 2D data can give us a simpler representation of the data. The whole purpose of the 8D math isn't to prove that the universe has eight dimensions, but to simplify very complex 3D phenomena.

[@BugsyBalone]

I'm not a scientist ... but does this guy talk around a point? What are you saying?

[@garysutherland7004]

Think of it as your vision. You stand in one spot and look at another spot, that is two dimensional. You can do that with your own eyes. To see in 3d you need to be able to stand in one spot and see two other spots, which you cannot do. So, IMAGINE you are standing in three spots. To do this you could go to each spot and snap two photographs, one looking at each of the two points. That is one way you can use a tool to perceive three dimensions. All you are doing is changing your perspectives so that collectively you can see every single ray of light reflected from each point. So, in theory, you must be able to see every single other point from each individual point. They are all connected. The reason you want to study the 3rd dimension from the 4th dimension, is because you can see everything in the 3rd dimension from there. There ARE no shadows in the 3rd dimension from the 4th dimension. There is nothing you cannot plainly see.

[@junak777]

[comment No53] Superluminal speeds(ftl of stars. Thales's theorem, speed of darkness vs speed of light..see youtube videos for more) telling in symbolic way what Tesla's multiplication table showing: that 3 or square is material object, that circle is light (or soul figuratively). My faSCInation with NoHMber 38 or 83 or 138 or 833(DNA related- see cshlnews video from Bruce Stillman # 65) begun 5 years ago, but last 2 I had synCHronisation(CH as 38) of a kind. I started to notice masonic way of building things, learn some new hermetic rules. And came across video about Lie's algebra. Or groups. Algebra is math way of manipulation in order to simplify or find order in chaos. Or seemingly random make chaotic and orded. Like hailstone problem or Collatz in meteorology or maybe in shooting 3pts and 1s.. I was wondering if squaring the circle is impossible like watching your 6... is it maybe possible to undestand better that octagon that in quasicrystalic way simulate 3d reality(or squares in which we places 7 chakras or circles)? Like dematerialisation, teleportation crystal. Maybe by engineering that everyone will come to sense and understand great idea of E8(E is 5, 3+5=8, if 5' in DNA is waht we looking for, in magic HeXagon 38 centre is hehagon with "number 5, like light switch" and "3 light out switch",,movement by which torsion became planar). In prime hexagon video I saw how moving direction to left on primes and right on composites works. In most sources I came by 5 as pentagram, pentagon, penthouse, Venus way, PYthagora has something to do with God. In numerical systems 888 is God. I have 88 Pythagorean system. (Pytha is spiral same meaning sanskrit, like penta 5. Y(odd finger of God, why cell O becomes G and later C in proteins..name maybe suggest odd numbers some of which are primes) is base for platonic solids. Invisible(dark?!) Right hand rule. Gorian is maybe gore or up- like spins pehaps as astrological symbols Mars and Uranus , G is 7, perhaps circle is 8, usually part that connect G into O is South). Basketball has 8 sides, 3 visible in 1 sight.

[@conorvedova3222]

I wonder if Banach-Tarski applies here somehow

[@erik-ic3tp]

What does that have to do with this?

[@rbolo29]

We live in a "shadow world."

[@willhart4762]

Please study the Great Pyramid. I think you'll realize that its veiled 8 sides embodies your theory. Tesla also knew this and he created his Tower in the shape of an octagon. Somebody knew this about the universe a long time ago.

[@time-mechanics]

4d > 8d time ... same 4d flat time but 8d all direction in time

[@nigeldupaigel]

So the hyperdimensional vectors 'language of the Father' projects with a 4D crystalline aka the language of the Mother, to create the tiling structure of reality. My mind has just been blown. The implications are very interesting, hippy tech alien world an all, but any way to test these eloquent maths?

[@____uncompetative]

I don't think you have the correct interpretation: Language = Syntax + Grammar Universe = E8 + Hyperdimensional Vector Projection

[@time-mechanics]

3D > 6d pairing = 3 physical dimensions 6 dimensions of freedom.

[@ConsiderationFarm]

Sounds like the sun (Father) and the Earth (Mother) making a mathematical product inside the Biosphere.

[@leejohnson320]

the premise of stacked spheres, is in my opinion wrong. do the math with toroidal spheres. which are a stable resonance fields. mum and dad are jus

[@max_s557]

I’m starting to realise what eastern philosophy meant when it described our reality as an illusion

[@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time]

The simplest geometrical shape formed within the Universe is a sphere! If the Universe is based on a geometrical process of spherical symmetry forming and breaking our maths could be based on this geometry, but the problem is the process also forms the potential for abstract mathematics that we see unfolding in the E8 geometry!

[@Mikelovision]

"It's simple. Therefore it's right!" That is your hypothesis in a nutshell. Not plausible.

[@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time]

This can be represented mathematically by just one equation (E=ˠM˳C²)∞ with energy ∆E equals mass ∆M linked to the Lorentz contraction ˠ of space and time. The Lorentz contraction ˠ represents the time dilation of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. The c² represents light radiating out in a sphere 4π of EMR from its radius forming a square c² of probability. At the smallest scale of this process the uncertainties and possibilities of everyday life are represented mathematically by Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π. The brackets in the equation (E=ˠM˳C²)∞ representing a dynamic boundary condition of an individual reference frame with an Arrow of Time for each reference frame. The infinity ∞ symbol represents an infinite number of dynamic interactive reference frames that are continuously coming in and out of existence with each one in many ways being a microcosm of the whole. What is not plausible?

[@kokopelli314]

A sphere is the set of all coordinates r distance from x y z

[@imaginaryuniverse632]

I just run across this E8 chrystal theory. I haven't figured out where it's derived from but I suspect that it's the Flower of Life. I also haven't seen what is the purpose of the translation if the pertinent information is found in this dimension, which I believe to be in a 3-d interpretation of the Flower that is necessarily distorted by the translation. I also agree that the sphere is where our focus should be even if it is not the simplest I think it's the simplest and best way to explain the basis for the fractile design of the Universe. It seems to me that the Plank length tetrahedron is unnecessarily confusing to the average person who can understand the description of the electro-magnetic toroidal vortex (sphere) and I believe that there are many practical uses that can be derived from the study of the Torus and I really don't see how understanding the Planck length tetrahedron is a help in this study, much less reverse engineering this information back, or up I don't know 🤔, to the eighth dimension.

[@imaginaryuniverse632]

I think he meant that the tetrahedron fills in a volume of space most efficiently and that's why he considers it the simplest, not that I speak for him. I think he's got a lot of good information. They have a lot of good posts. I enjoy your posts as well.

[@peppe77ish]

So what dimension do one call the smallest places, quantum physics.. Where it is no materia, only frequences that makes up our 3-d world...frequences that make our world. Ive smoke DMT a couple of Times and I was sure ive Come down to a quantum mechanical space,, where there were beings made out of frequences and Light,,, frequences give away... These ones were loving but since they where operating on frequences that felt 5 to8 ore even 11 th dimension everything went to fast since they morphed into 4-dimensional objects hat did the same in hyperspacetime... These things builded the most beautiful objects ive seen.... our material 3-d world are builded with frequences and Light. How can our universe be built out of none solidmaterial by what seemed to be like beings made out of mega complex geometri and Light wthin different frequences that made itself

[@KWU_369]

E8+¹ Affine (Extended)

[@Guide504]

So gravity is an emergent force and is the pervasive universal conciousness.

[@time-mechanics]

3/8 = 🌎

[@garysmith1135]

But there are 8 dimensions, not 4. Otherwise, humans only experience 3 1/2 dimensions. What's half a dimension?

[@garysmith1135]

There is a difference between left and right, up and down , forward and backward. There are TWO ways to move through every one dimension or are they dimensions themselves? Does anyone have a dictionary?

[@anniyüüü]

I need Sheldon to dumb this down for me

[@ALEXGIBSONCMG]

This episode is epic!!! ^o^

[@xrobfrankx]

Anyway you guys could better described the projector I'm having a little trouble understandingt

[@thefoxfamily341]

Need also Support..best wishes from the 8th. 😂 ❤❤❤

[@cafedelmario]

Im here because i just want to know if i can teleport off this earth!

[@keithtinkler4073]

Would not a more immediate analogy be the that view of you on KZbin - is 2 dimension - that we extrude to 3d in our mind (whether or not we have 3d screens!).

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

That works too. Although he is speaking to an interviewer in the room who could put his hand up and cover an eye so one could argue that is more immediate :)

[@gogogravity]

Really confused with this 8 dimension stuff.

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

Yeah it's pretty weird stuff. We're making a documentary about it right now to help explain it.

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHvMZJKwo9JqkKc

[@takiclintonharness1449]

Just try to watch more videos on the topic. It would make sense at the right time.

[@earthman7678]

I wonder if the so called “father” projector casting “light” on the "mother" 8D quasicrystals space substructure is what defines the “child/shadow” or the expression of matter in the universe. Resulting in the creation of Baryonic mater emerging as dualistic pairs relative to the golden ratio. As appose to dark matter and energy which could potentially be expressed likely in infinite ways relative to the “angle” of the “father light” to the 8D foundation. I suppose the first attempt to test this would be to try to observe the interactions of dark matter and see if they follow the golden ratio the way typical mater does or if it expresses some other formation via a different geometric ratio. Perhaps it wont exist in pairs but singles or triples or whatever weird thing the geometry does. Making it more or less non-interactive with us. That would mean the universe was a "solid" object composed of different phases of matter some of which created the material of space. Like black on a screen.

[@imaginaryuniverse632]

Earth Man I starting to think that dark matter and baryonic matter are the same thing but one is kinetic (visible matter) and the other potential (Vector equilibrium, the nucleus of the Toroid, the void, consciousness, might be what he refers to as the E-8 crystal others call it's form the cube octahedron). I agree with you, it's the joining of the masculine and feminine attributes that is responsible for all of Creation/the child, I'm not sure what you meant by shadow. I believe that the Universe is entirely pixelated with trillions of trillions of Planck length Vector equilibriums and I'm wondering if these may actually not be equal but have more mass(magnetism, feminine) than is necessary to contain the vectors of electricity (masculine) to neutralize the opposite spin of the antimatter Created as it's reflection, oh is that what you meant by shadow? I think that the angle of the photon would allow for this process to regulate matter and antimatter as I believe that the angle of approach to the nucleus, the void.. is entirely determined by consciousness which I think is entirely what the void is and nothing ever enters the void but it appears to me that some particles get stuck to it for a time until it's reflection interacts with it and returns it to equilibrium. I believe this process is the basis for Hawking radiation. I know I comment too long but I don't know how to keep it short and I'm probably rambling because I'm tired. I hope that you will continue to learn about the Universe and it's basis, the Flower of Life because they hold the secret to man's redemption and in the present no one has found it that is willing to share it. Namaste

[@nolan412]

Ball on ball?

[@Syzygy77]

Kind of sounds like the Phoenix theory of quantum entanglement.

[@jamesmoran7511]

Very typical. Scientists expect you to accept a concept with no explanation to build more complex ideas. Anything beyond 3 dimensions is purely a concept and theoretical. I invite this dude to explain the 8 and 4 dimensional crystals. I'll buy lunch and coffee and listen attentively.

[@darrelllashmar7905]

"Father projector" sounds like god. Oh dear, do we have an explanation for the "projector"? Or does invoking god indicate E8 math is not physical? What about (E9)*(2time)? Warning; god is here too. Manifests as the event horizon that constructs all, by informing/maintaining the path/vectors of super fluid that surrounds it. I like to say, "maintenance of the pattern or code". ie Resonance 18.

[@garysutherland7004]

It's a way to describe the origins for the concept of God. There's really not alot of need to be secretive or mystical when discussing sacred Geometry, as men like the one in the video have and are providing the observable proof to understand what it means. 8th dimension is as far as we can go for observational proof. From the 9th dimension to infinite dimensions, the reflections are infinite, so you would not need to project the 9th dimension anywhere to see it, you could see it all from the 9th dimension.

[@priestadam7337]

🤔

[@Mycthedestroyer]

Basicly information menifesting

[@charlesdrury9712]

Wow I consider myself intelligent but not that intelligent it would take me some time to understand what he’s talking about they need to use visualization words don’t describe things like a picture like that Saying a picture paints 1000 words

[@2000sborton]

Hilarious. I love how he struggles to keep a straight face as he spews this nonsense. Especially whenever he mentions unification physics.

[@user-kf1wp3xe7p]

so you people know all this and yet you still cant develop any technology that materializes a 3d object, from a 8d laser beam lol

[@danielbuchanan1560]

It's very hard to watch your video when you say um every 10 seconds, you seem distracted and you seem like you have really bad heartburn.Maybe type up a script next time

[@stephen7774]

The simplest shape in 3 dimensions is a sphere dummy! Not a tetrahedron.

[@tallterrilaw8646]

So people who are blind in one eye only see in 2 deminsion? Lol

[@BrightBlueJim]

No. we have two different mechanisms for perceiving depth. One is stereoscopic vision, which is effective for close objects (those within the range of our grasp, roughly), and the other is parallax, the way things appear to move relative to each other as we move. That is, if I am moving left-to-right (for example), close objects move right-to-left in comparison to farther objects. This allows people with only one functioning eye to still be able to catch a ball. Which they can.

[@tallterrilaw8646]

@@BrightBlueJim well I'm legally blind in one eye and I see in 3d. However I can't see 3d in paintings where there are 3d hidden images in the painting. Nor can I see through 3d glasses because I can only see through one lens. But as far as my world view everything is 3 deminsional.

[@BrightBlueJim]

@@tallterrilaw8646 That's kind of what cheese master says in his comment. So, can you catch a ball?

[@tallterrilaw8646]

@@BrightBlueJim um I don't and never have liked balls flying towards my face! Is it possible yes, am I good at it? No!

[@BrightBlueJim]

@@tallterrilaw8646 Lol! Honestly, neither am I, and I have two working eyes.

[@tehdreamer]

Wow I wonder how the trinity of God father son and holy spirit could be some form of higher dimensional consciousness structure.

[@loststar9970]

Now he’s just making up words

[@loststar9970]

I’m kidding, love this guy