This case demonstrates one of the biggest flaws in customary court judgments: a lack of concrete evidence. While the man's presence in the female toilets is suspicious, it does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was having an affair with the accused woman. It is possible that he could have been a peeping tom or had some other reason for being there. Without solid proof, such as eyewitness accounts or physical evidence, these cases often rely on speculation and hearsay, which can lead to unfair convictions and punishments.
@pastorjoshuashumba57372 ай бұрын
Mai avo vanyeperwa,,,, mhosva ndeyekut wapindirei mutoilet yevanhukadzi, apa husiku, Mai avo face yavo kunyeperwa hapana ane humboo apo