Korea. IL2 Series: Explosion Craters

Рет қаралды 9,917

IL-2 Series

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер

@esprit_d_escalier 3 ай бұрын

As a train driver I can tell you this is 100% realistic. 😅

@001davem 2 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@andrewa837 3 ай бұрын

I love how the craters actually impact other objects in the world. We can only hope for some sort of semi-dynamic / dynamic campaign.

@mailman35419 3 ай бұрын

Nope. Career mode like the IL-2 great battles. Bur more in depth You manage the squadrons pilot. Planes. Supplies. Pilots get injured and need rest. Planes get damaged and need repair. You need to manage fuel and Ammo and make sure to stay up to date with requests. They can't do dynamic or even semi dynamic campaigns In a historical setting. That would defeat the historical purpose and allow for ahistorical situations. Which sure would be awesome but still. No matter what history still plays out as it did IRL. The North will push into the South. The South will push back. The Chinese will intervene and push back. The stalemate will ensure. There's not going be to a Falcon BMS situation where you destroy a bunch of bridges then suddenly the Chinese can't intervene. That would change history. Which this game is not about.

@Warsimulation1997 3 ай бұрын

@@mailman35419what does history and gameplay have anything to do with each other? Setting is Korea. Yes. Gameplay is linear and not much in terms of replayablity. We know the way the war played out we understand history. What is the point of participating in a war that is linear to begin with? If my plane destroys a vital enemy supply route looking to suppy nearby troops. Or wipes out 10s of squadrons in nearby airfields, why can’t that have an influence on the operational level? There’s no excuse as to why we can’t have a dynamic campaign. It takes away from the abundant possibilities we can have. The immersion factor, knowing that my flight can have an impact on the war is already enough for me to purchase. The fact that it is not dynamic is a no buy for me, honestly.

@MosoKaiser 3 ай бұрын

@@mailman35419 _"Defeat the historical purpose and allow for ahistorical situations"_ ...uh-huh? What exactly are you smoking? But still what? That's precisely the point of dynamic campaigns in a historical setting. To possibly go in totally new, unexpected directions. _"That would change history."_ Please tell me you're not being serious, because Poe's law's presence is feeling pretty strong here...

@gvii 3 ай бұрын

You're doing a dang fine job of keeping my interest absolutely peaked, in case you were wondering. Which you probably weren't since you all have much more important things to do right now, lol. But anyway, very nice work you're doing. I cannot wait for this game to make its way into the wild. It is nice to see this era get some more attention. It's going to be great having aerial gunfights in jets without having to stare holes in your radar screen and RWR to try to avoid that guided missile barrage that someone burped at you from 60 miles away. Just the good ol' honest dogfighting so many of us adore, but faster and higher.

@zestyquestman8378 3 ай бұрын

The fidelity of the transport network is making me hope for some kind of dynamic campaign!

@ryancnayr 3 ай бұрын

Amazing work, IL2 Korea will truly be a game changer and I can’t wait

@mr.danload 3 ай бұрын

Imho dirt and especially dust settles down to quickly. At least dust should stay for longer, but looks already amazing!

@hunormagyar1843 3 ай бұрын

Indeed. Modern Il-2 is scared of particle effects. Smoke trails are kinda short too. And in Great Battles multiplayer you despawn in 5 seconds if you're pilotsniped, regardless of whether your plane has hit the ground already or not. Things just kinda get mopped up too quickly in favour of performance. Guess it's the curse of modern graphics. Wasn't such issue in Il-2 1946 I don't think... Tho idk.

@littlesparr 3 ай бұрын

That is why im not buying dcs and only il-2

@wiwa23 3 ай бұрын

Why? That tent seems evenly indesctructable to me...

@littlesparr 3 ай бұрын

@@wiwa23 what tent?

@wiwa23 3 ай бұрын

@@littlesparr Those tents...a couple of feet from the explosions... those tents that would be shredded from the blast/fragmentation of the explosions. Those tents. But the immersion is kept when you indeed ignore them or dond't see them;).

@littlesparr 3 ай бұрын

@@wiwa23 oh, maybe they will fix that because game is promised to come out only in 2025

@wiwa23 3 ай бұрын

@@littlesparr yes... I can imagine. Was not bashing. It's a thing that's annoying in DCC and a thing I see here as well. But there is still time. Hope they will get blast fragmentation right in both sims actually.

@9yobruce 3 ай бұрын

maybe a few variations in the shapes of the explosions would make it even better

@Panchoproductions2069 3 ай бұрын

Better than DCS

@paulsaunders6536 3 ай бұрын

Not really. But it’s not a competition. With the right hardware DCS is an amazing experience in VR, but you need the right hardware to experience it at its best. Terrain implementation for VR is inconsistent, I found the Marianas is a frame rate killer in VR, even with a 14900k CPU and a 4090 card. Others are good. IL2 is much more consistent, Normandy used to be a problem over cities and or in the larger dogfights but that seems to have been resolved. I get a steady 72 FPS in IL2 in all circumstances now ( that’s the refresh rate I set my Crystal at). It’s just a pity that the cockpits in IL2 aren’t clickable. Both sims have their strengths and weaknesses. I’ll continue flying both with equal enthusiasm.

@hunormagyar1843 3 ай бұрын

Nice, but the entire clip seems to be at 2x speed, or is it just me? Dust settles very quickly, the P-51 kinda tips over awkwardly, and the train bounces jankily. The concept is good though.

@smigoltime 3 ай бұрын

looks goofy ahh, but with some physics touch it might look great

@il2_sturmovik 3 ай бұрын

yes, it will be refined further before release

@Syntax152 3 ай бұрын

Wont be looking as gooffy when youre about 15000 or even higher

@radulandinho75 2 ай бұрын

I will be buying it as soon as it comes out. IL2 hasn't disappointed yet. Except when they released the unfinished Cliffs of Dover. Or Flying Circus without a campaign. The DCS people love to release modern American planes, and then have them fight Russian planes from the 80. They are excellent at feeding the ego of their American customers, simulating "spreading of democracy" operations.

@man_vs_life 3 ай бұрын

Great to see that detailed collision physics are being implemented. 👍

@swedishtwinsband 3 ай бұрын

Beautiful guys. Really great work here.

@OverVolts83 3 ай бұрын

I really hope it has a dynamic coop campaign at release

@s.turner7144 3 ай бұрын

Nice! Are tanks going to be implemented? T34's were used by the north Koreans. The Allies had Sherman's and Churchill's along with many others.

@TyroneSayWTF 3 ай бұрын

Oh yeah! Good stuff indeed!

@alexalexovich6356 3 ай бұрын

Great!!!

@Crusaderbois 3 ай бұрын

They might have helicopters come as like a dlc that would be cool

@TheGrechuxD 3 ай бұрын

Nice!! Good joob, I think I'll add some shrapnel or shrapnel that will hit the ground :) I'm waiting now for the video, the new Demage System and Crash Physics, and I heard that it will be 🤔🙃🙂 #IL-2 Series

@davido1953 3 ай бұрын

can't wait!

@AntonioPignatiello77 3 ай бұрын

really your IL2 simulator is one of the best, I have more than 5000 hours and I'm sure that KOREA will be a great success, I'll tell you the only weakness that I see like many people, which is that there is no native rearming in the game in IL2 and that is a big lack of effort for a simulator of such quality as your product, doing it through the editor is not for everyone, it has to be native within the game, a hug and enjoying IL2 like crazy and I make this humble but brutally important request, you are appreciated and 10/10

@TheRaptorXX 3 ай бұрын

Love it, it looks grrrrrrrrRRRRREAT!!

@dadssimulations 3 ай бұрын

Is korea going to be a expansion to the great battles series or a new standalone sim?

@zloy1445 3 ай бұрын

Терраформинг это всегда +

@muhammadsaleh7229 3 ай бұрын

The only true flight sim besides Falcon bms

@RAF33Strike 3 ай бұрын

I think BMS, DCS and IL-2 all have extremely high standards to flight dynamics modeling, authenticity and gameplay. Then, they have each their own strengths which make one more preferable to the other depending on what your personal preferences are. I own all three and I'm glad there is variety in the market.

@muhammadsaleh7229 3 ай бұрын

@@RAF33Strike Unlike dcs , bms and il2 actually give you the proper timeframe and scenarios to enjoy

@Viper816 3 ай бұрын

@@muhammadsaleh7229 but you dictate the mission?

@funkyschnitzel 3 ай бұрын

@@muhammadsaleh7229 in fairness to DCS, if you want to play 80s or 90s cold war, you've got tons of options there. Even 70s is very viable now that the phantom is in game. The 50s/60s is limited mainly by maps. We don't have Korea or Vietnam, so the sabre and mig 15 don't have their main playground. And if you want to do a 1944 WW2 mission, there's a reasonable selection there too. IL-2 definitely offers the superior WW2 setting, although I've always found the flight dynamics a bit too forgiving in that sim. BMS offers a superior falcon simulation, but that's it. DCS absolutely has its place in the market, and if you want to do 80s carrier ops, there's no better place to be!

@RAF33Strike 3 ай бұрын

@@muhammadsaleh7229 Which I agree are some of their strengths. DCS does feel deprived of many potential systems/aircraft, both flyable and AI-only across WW2, Cold War and modern eras. However, DCS has an edge in graphics, aircraft variety with unparalleled systems fidelity and interaction, and a powerful, albeit cumbersome, scripting and scenario editing engine.

@nateweter4012 3 ай бұрын

I really hope they can transfer over all these new features into IL-2 Great Battles. I would pay a lot of $ for remastered Stalingrad, Moscow, Velikiye Luki, etc.

@juuuxie2631 3 ай бұрын

Sadly they've already said they can't. A lot of the new things we get to see in the Korea title are because of an entirely new engine. They literally pushed the great battles title(s) to the max

@Storm5151 3 ай бұрын

Ну дождались😊

@gazaneagles 3 ай бұрын

nice explosions, reminds me of the good old Rise of Flight graphics!

@norman191000 3 ай бұрын

Great idea, just bring some hard physical constraints to prevent trains flying up hundreds of meters.

@hunormagyar1843 3 ай бұрын

Yeah the train was quite janky the way it derailed...

@rrr39video 3 ай бұрын

А палатку почему взрывом не унесло?

@ОлегБисеров-в3ф 3 ай бұрын

Что горит в паровозе?

@DirkLarien 3 ай бұрын

🤣 how they drive into it. But really that is pretty cool. So many possibilities with this. failed mission can become partial temporary success.

@Hosscoller 3 ай бұрын

Well, let's hope your pilot doesn't die when you bail or ditch in the sea.

@MekStark1980 3 ай бұрын

Hind from 1996 called, it wants it's 3d craters back ;) Good video and addition!

@monostripeexplosiveexplora2374 3 ай бұрын

looking nice

@airfigueruelo3644 3 ай бұрын

Amazing physics 😂

@bndahi8251 3 ай бұрын

0:25 my life currently

@pilotabsolut3129 3 ай бұрын

very nice

@jaromirandel543 3 ай бұрын

I guess it is for illustration. IRL train would not go into such really big and visible crater.

@Hauggyful 3 ай бұрын

Trains don't stop instantly the breaking distance even on modern trains is usually in the hundreds of meters.

@jaromirandel543 3 ай бұрын

@@Hauggyful 10 seconds is not much. But this train looks like moving very slowly. Also I can see and hear it was not braking.

@sunrise-r19 3 ай бұрын

@jaromirandel543 You have a good point. but you will agree it looks more spectacular this way

@Hauggyful 3 ай бұрын

@@sunrise-r19 Yea actually seeing the wagons come apart beats the old IL-2 animation that just turned them grey.

@LuftManu 3 ай бұрын

This is awesome!

@sunrise-r19 3 ай бұрын

"This is Sex."

@maximpikalev9538 3 ай бұрын

absolutely comical, please don't change a thing

@il2_sturmovik 3 ай бұрын

At the moment of collision there is a transition from simplified to detailed motion physics, so the locomotive in the video is thrown too high into the air - this transition is yet to be tuned but will be to give more realistic-looking results.