I've got to say it. Please TAMP that like and subscribe if you enjoyed the video! Much appreciate all the support and hope you enjoyed!
@CaveyMoth6 ай бұрын
I usually tamp to avoid channeling..but I don't want to avoid your channel.
@adambroussard81926 ай бұрын
Wondering if you’ve seen that fluid tamper? Basically a water bed tamper. Ends up in a puck with even density, although not even depth.
@adambroussard81926 ай бұрын
The Idroprep Hydroforming Tamper
@CL-yp1bs6 ай бұрын
I just TAMPER THE $HyT out of it!!!! BOOOOMM LANCE!!
@Phil_OG6 ай бұрын
Please a video on head space next.
@ffar6666 ай бұрын
Hey Lance, awesome content as always! I know sponsorships are important, and wanting to promote better mental health is great, but Better Help is a very questionable company. Among other things, they had a multi-million dollar settlement for selling the health data of their patients to social media companies, and their work environment is exploitative, pushing therapists to burnout.
@AlphaTenkai5 ай бұрын
Yeah would be nice to see a little more research be done on the sponsors used for the channel
@ok-consumer6 ай бұрын
I exclusively tamp with a dune sand thumper. The spice must flow.
@CaveyMoth6 ай бұрын
It attracts too many puck worms. You have to tamp without rhythm.
@cade54006 ай бұрын
As I consume larger and larger quantities of caffeine I’ve become imbued with a terrible purpose. I know this road leads to me drinking the espresso of life - at 100% extraction it’s unclear how it’s a liquid at all. 🏜️
@wright.boy_6 ай бұрын
may thy puck chip and shatter
@cade54006 ай бұрын
@@wright.boy_ That one killed me 🤣
@jeromepaguyo2156 ай бұрын
As it is written
@jonathonbaron29146 ай бұрын
What I love about this channel and Lance is that he’ll throw in a “You can run the bootstrap at home” as a totally off-the-cuff comment in a detailed video on espresso tamping. Plug-in estimation and extraction; your content rules, Lance.
@tomaszbejnarowicz6 ай бұрын
tea guys: putting water into a cup. coffee guys:
@antiwoosh43026 ай бұрын
this is specialty coffee stuff, you would be surprised if you know what specialty tea culture is like especially in china
@tomaszbejnarowicz6 ай бұрын
thats only a joke@@antiwoosh4302
@loganmontgomery19556 ай бұрын
specialty tea is definitely a thing in Asia, and it can definitely be this nerdy
@Ramu-106 ай бұрын
Tea ceremonies: "Am I a joke to you?"
@MonsieurArlequin6 ай бұрын
You clearly never had Chinese gongfu style tea. In fact, tea bags are one of the worse ways to have tea. There is actually no way to actually tell the quality of tea in tea bags. Once you go loose leaf, you never go back. Tea bags just taste weak and bland
@cade54006 ай бұрын
This was really helpful as someone just starting to get into espresso. I had a fear (from where I’m not sure) of over tamping, feel a bit more confident now. The cue “until you feel the table pushing back” was extremely helpful.
@quantitativecafe6 ай бұрын
Wonderful experiment, Lance! I'm particularly impressed with the number of shots you've been using for recent experiments--the repetition must have been really tedious, but it also makes this a data set we can build on with some confidence. It's interesting to see not just the averages, but also that the spread for each data set was about the same--i.e., double tamping doesn't seem to give a more consistent extraction. I would guess that the double-tamped puck is a little denser, hence a slightly longer shot time to get to the same output weight. I find it can be difficult to predict if this will give more or less extraction--it doesn't seem to be a simple linear relationship--so it's great to see experimental results in typical espresso shots. I really like the idea of using density as another variable that we can use to offset some negative effects, e.g., of grinding finer, or to extend contact time with coarse grinds.
@jtvrm16 ай бұрын
Great work as usual Lance. One small detail to keep in mind other than roast level, the type of grinder and burrs used. Flat burrs and conical burrs commonly give rise to differently shaped particles which will have different packing factors regardless of the pressure or number of tamps used. Sorry for nerding out a bit, it's what I do for a living - material chemist. Still a very good overview that will definately help a lot of people get better espresso.
@LanceHedrick6 ай бұрын
Yeah I figured that was implied tbh lol I talk about this in so many videos about partcile compression I maybe errantly assumed knowledge in the side of the audience on that basic principle lol Appreciate the watch!
@wsuvjosh6 ай бұрын
Imagine explaining the difference between conical and flat to Lance 😭😅
@fu5ha_editsАй бұрын
He literally mentions this in the video when he says "different grinders give different particle distributions" lol
@247geoffers6 ай бұрын
Throwing out a quick content request that no one seems to have covered... Pre-infusion vs extraction yield! Really interested to see if 2ml, 5ml or even 10ml of pre-infusion plays a big role in the overall extraction yield.... Loving this content series 😊
@IanLandesman6 ай бұрын
Finally an explanation about the double tamping. The mystery in my mind is resolved. Nice to know I can expect my questions to be answered shortly in the future. Thanks!
@ianlacour97016 ай бұрын
Surprised you didn’t talk about Nutation. It’s not a very consistent method of tamping, however it reminds me a lot about what you discuss towards the end of the video. Great Vid Lance!
@ozeltzex16 ай бұрын
Nutation is the best way by far. Maximum density, minimum room for serious errors, zero cost. I've been using it for 10 years and don't look back.
@propertwb6 ай бұрын
Excellent information. You, more than anyone on KZbin,are taking the science of coffee making to a new level. Thanks!
@all_systems_failing72356 ай бұрын
Didn't expect a cameo from the Breville Razor. Have you thought about examining the effects of dosing by weight versus volume?
@sydnerd6 ай бұрын
By that point I experience a similar rush of love through my body that I'm getting from coffee just by hearing Lance talking for a split second.
@joshuabatchelder17976 ай бұрын
Great video! Not to be needy, but I’d love an in-depth video on pre-infusion 😂
@beardedschlim6 ай бұрын
You're killing it with those videos Lance !
@NdrewPoon6 ай бұрын
Great video! This is extremely helpful and educational. Will watch it over and over!
@talkingwithstrangers6 ай бұрын
STOP PUSHING BETTER HELP!! They don't background check their therapists and are insanely harmful for the industry. Please do some research into them. HORRIBLE/DANGEROUS company.
@Pilgrimsandpioneers5 ай бұрын
Thank you for this. I’ve questioned the importance of the pressure vs grind size and this has really helped.
@glleon805176 ай бұрын
I have a Breville Dual Boiler and use a heavy tamper with the same OD as the stock damper. I tamp until I perceive that the tamper is fully seated and no longer moving. 19 g in, 40 g out, 7 second preinfusion. I always double tamp because the tamper leaves a tiny ring of coffee un-compressed at the edge of the portafilter so I tap it away from the edge and re-tamp. However, if I really stand on the tamper it will compress the puck to completely block the flow of coffee. So I maintain that there is still more puck compression possible after you think it is fully tamped.
@GG-dz1oz6 ай бұрын
Fantastic video. Thanks for all the work you put into your videos. Greatly appreciated. See you in Copenhagen in June ☕️
@camaperture81165 ай бұрын
I’m a bit confused about how various springs affect the tamp. Once the puck is compressed and resisting further force, how is the spring rating a factor?
@dparad226 ай бұрын
Hey Lance, can you do a video about setting the optimal pump pressure on a non-pressure profile machine? Aside from pre-brew, the new Linea Mini R encourages playing with the full pressure (e.g., 8 bars instead of 9 bars) and making it easy to adjust. Thanks for doing a great job with these vids!
@ahpadt6 ай бұрын
Id be interested in this too
@michaelcibula95526 ай бұрын
Same here!
@TomJones-tx7pb6 ай бұрын
The important thing is the pressure gradient through the puck , and the absolute pressure in the puck, not the pressure that the group-head is seeing. This is affected by many things that Lance talks about in many of his videos. You can play with this by using high and low flow baskets, filter papers, various screens. As well as adjusting how many fines your grinder produces (slow feeding, burr type), and where they are distributed in the puck (WDT versus shaking). The effects of these varies based upon the coffee you are using. Overall, I would say a 9 bar group-head pressure, a good grinder, and a classical puck prep, as shown by the Wired Gourmet in a recent video should give you acceptable results with minimal fuss.
@dparad226 ай бұрын
@@TomJones-tx7pb My question is: presuming all other variables are equal, what is the optimal pump pressure in a non-pressure profile EM?
@TomJones-tx7pb6 ай бұрын
Hoffman has tried to address that in his videos, and landed on 9 bar. That is not accurate, however, because the manometer reading is different on different machines. It would be more accurate to say that James does not like the machines he reviews set to 10 bar or above. Each coffee is different, which is why Lance goes on about the "dialing in" so much. Also a lot of coffees are forgiving on pressure. In fact a lot of coffees are forgiving on everything, within limits. Watching puck prep in some videos reminds me of Rafael Nadal getting ready to serve. @@dparad22
@yy123456789ful17 күн бұрын
@15:16 "🥁Tamp with 15 lbs 🥁Tamp with 15 lbs "🎶🎶🎶
@PleasantDoorknob6 ай бұрын
Very succinct and easy to understand, good job and thank you! One thing I did notice is my V5 decent tamper doesn’t have those screws so it should no longer be an issue with the latter versions.
@Logan.Shearer6 ай бұрын
Love that you tested against your biases. Great video and great study. I’m curious if the density factor of the puck becomes less relevant as line pressure decreases
@tristam.6 ай бұрын
Lance! You probably won't see this but figured it's worth a shot. I love the cup at 16:03, any chance you could share where you got it? Cheers!
@gus_88625 ай бұрын
Check Sur la table “Gharyan Mug” ..not 100% sure
@nickflesher76086 ай бұрын
I just want to say I think your videos have improved alot in the last year. Crushin it!
@lukesolomon226 ай бұрын
Lance the big open question now is.. will you still continue to double tamp?
@Flyingwithoutmings6 ай бұрын
Perfect timing for watching this on my lunch break 🤠
@carrscoffee5 ай бұрын
Great video lance . Im wondering .... i use the same coffee always... i can do the same things "consistency " and tamp the same way but some times its a squirter or its a small channel. This is aggravating to me because in espresso there is always that small variable that comes out even tho we do the same thing again and again. Is it uneven bed or how you put the beans in the grinder? Its happened to everyone.... anyways thanks for the info as always.
@NickRosaci6 ай бұрын
Let's do away with those BetterHelp sponsorships. They have a horrible reputation for poor therapy practices.
@ellisboys786 ай бұрын
Amazing video. I have been thinking about this issue a lot lately. Very thorough and tremendously helpful. Thank you!
@darylfortney80816 ай бұрын
one interesting thing that can easily be seen in this video is how the decent tamper which supposedly is self-leveling actually can produce astonishingly un-level tamps (7:13). My guess is it isn't that double tamping improves puck density but on the second tamp the un-levelled spring is resetting and re-levelling the puck in a different way. Try your experiment again with a non-spring tamper.
@LanceHedrick6 ай бұрын
Yeah it can. That was Hugo tamping, btw. Lol Any spring tamp can do this. The leveler is a guide
@CaveyMoth6 ай бұрын
This is why I tamp with a self-leveling tamper while I still have the dosing ring attached (as long as the ring holds the tamper level above the coffee, and allows the tamper to sink in deep enough).
@davewellscoffee6 ай бұрын
The only issue with a full pressure tamp using a manual tamper is that any issue with technique (like having a very slight angle when pressing down) can quickly lead to a really uneven puck. Arguably not relevant if you have good technique, but a lot of beginners will do more harm than good by trying to tamp very hard. Really useful video, thanks Lance
@michaellopez-lq5fn6 ай бұрын
Thank you lance for your amazing contribution to my coffee knowledge. I have a really fun idea for how to work with some of these concepts.
@ygayovy2 ай бұрын
You're wrong about Normcore tamper, it has 2 springs one of which is so soft that it doesn't skew the result much if at all and that's the one that is responsible for depth.
@CaveyMoth6 ай бұрын
I ironically found that a spring collar tamper can lead to uneven tamping for me because the collar blocks my view of the tamper as it enters the basket. I like to use my spring tamper while I have a dosing ring on the basket because the ring holds the tamper up off of the coffee nice and level before I finally start the tamp. 8:43 Just like The Wired Gourmet says, coffee volume/headspace is the most important variable for even water distribution through the puck.
@RegrinderAlert6 ай бұрын
Puck thickness and enough headspace are important, sure. But perfecting those without also perfecting prep won’t give you good results with light roasts. Probably the only decent WiredGourmet video out there. He spreads so much misinformation it’s beyond belief.
@TomJones-tx7pb6 ай бұрын
I agree puck prep is critical. I failed at it for decades. Your comment is amusing to me because I watch many Lance videos where I react negatively, but not Wired Gourmet. I think part of my issue is that Lance's taste buds are not like mine and he likes light roasts, and you can go seriously wrong doing what he says with darker roasts. Anyways if you use a screen, you can overfill a basket but not under fill it (within reason), which Wired Gourmet does not talk about properly.@@RegrinderAlert
@petes_CE6 ай бұрын
I think the Razor tool is a great idea. I created one for my Rancilio Silvia and IMS baskets after seeing my pucks obliterated by being too close to the showerscreen. My puck now stays intact and has a longer extraction time. Also, the dose trimming tool cleans up the sides of the basket, resulting in a cleaner shower screen. I wish more manufacturers would include a dose trimming tool with their machines.
@Natalia-f6j6 ай бұрын
Reduce your dose
@petes_CE6 ай бұрын
@@Natalia-f6jhow much?
@nevereverbeendonebefore6 ай бұрын
Should I just switch to a Nespresso?
@lockedout86436 ай бұрын
I kinda knew adjusting tamp pressure instead of grind was wrong and lazy, no excuses now I've had it explained so clearly.
@frntrunr6 ай бұрын
I'm curious if anyone has checked if the puck particles are finer after multiple tamps? Could increased pressure and or tamps be breaking the grinds into smaller particles which is slowing down the shot and not simply pressing the grinds together? Similar to a fast vs slow feed to the grinder. If we are spending so much on good grinders and the extra time to slow feed to get a consistent particle size, I would be worried that I'm crushing the grinds into finer particles ruining my previous efforts. After a quick google search, I couldn't find any info on how much pressure it takes to break a coffee bean. Which I'm sure would change as the particles get smaller.
@coffeenerdaaron6 ай бұрын
Fantastic video Lance and Hugo!!
@almightygoz216 ай бұрын
Hi Lance! You will want to look see if anyone posted the name of a coffee automation firm that was at NVIDIA GTC. It manually adjusted a Mazzer grinder on the fly and used a manual La Marzocco machine. They had sensors everywhere. They probably have very interesting data. The rep said it could adjust for any variable dynamically.
@warpheus11586 ай бұрын
thanks for the tldw 🙂 always apreciate
@LanceHedrick6 ай бұрын
The whole video is gooood tho
@ggcadc6 ай бұрын
really great as always. making coffee more evidence based will help everyone in the long run.
@alexaguillon79045 ай бұрын
On the topic of edge extraction. I’ve gone back to not distributing my grinds and just tamping straight out of the grinder where the mound is in the middle. Not only has my consistency improved but my flavor is noticeably better. I went to Wild Goose in California and noticed they were doing this and they were serving some of the thickest juice bomb espresso I’ve ever had. And it made me think that maybe these baskets were designed before WDT and this is why they operate better without WDT. I think you should re-run this experiment without WDT as the control.
@ovi_46 ай бұрын
Fantastic videos Thank you. Because of you, my interest in coffee has been awakened. As of now, my setup is a Bambino Plus + DF54 grinder. I also have a Rancilio Silvia V5 (2016) that is on standby for a "Gaggiuino" PID upgrade. My tamping rig is a tamper/leveling tool (so, two in one) from "iKAPE" and I'm happy with it. I usually tap twice anyway. I have a "side question" for you, please. In the video, I see a white scale. Is that an "AKU Varia" ? I'm on the verge of buying a decent scale but don't want to spend crazy amounts of money on what to me is a: "grossly overpriced" Acaia Scales.
@StephenSmith3046 ай бұрын
Re: the normcore / other spring loaded tampers, what I ended up doing was doing a tamp with a certain spring, then measuring how much headspace there is, then tamping onto a scale until the same headspace is left (ie no headapace = full plunge, 5mm headspace means the tamper stops 5mm short of a full plunge because the level keeper is 5mm elevated compared to the start of the tamper plunger start of travel). Then depending on the result on the scale I swap out the spring to achieve the tamp pressure I want. I really hope someone makes a constant force mechanism tamper or makes a tamper with calibrated springs and markings on the tamper shaft that let you reference a chart to get actual accurate readings on tamp pressure based on what percent you compressed the spring. Or maybe someone could make a digital tamper with a load cell that beeps when you hit your set pressure like digital torque wrenches.
@nehok6 ай бұрын
Yeah ive beenn thinking about it a bit lately, I think the digital load cell may be the option that takes off. Im surprised there isnt one in the market already. Who knows maybe we will see a kick starter for one before too long. I think there are a couple like the mh3bomber one that has a calibrated spring that clicks when its fully compressed but the reviews are mixed as to how it actually works. I have the YMWVH version which i really similar to the norm core, in some pics it has markings on the shaft like you say though mine doesn't. Im esentially banking on the max depression always being over the 30lb mark or so. I havent dont much measureing of head space etc yet, - I would think to measure tamp force you could just put it on the scales as normal then record the results as the spring bottoms obviously after that point the readings will be off. Im not sure you need to mess around with measureing head space unless Im missing something. At any rate my machine is a lapavoni pro which is not exactly the best machine to gage consistency, though the spring tamper is definialty a improvment over the plastic one I had before.
@inteliov57565 ай бұрын
Breville/Sage recommend to double tamp using their impress machines. Maybe they can tell you why that is…
@tamninja6 ай бұрын
Great video as always!
@solaregg1236 ай бұрын
Thanks for doing all the test.
@goldfish81964 ай бұрын
lovely episode
@izoard776 ай бұрын
An honorable mention for the RAZOR TOOL!!! YES!!!
@DaniilOskolkov6 ай бұрын
What if double tamp has a lesser extraction, just because it has less of the channels, so the amount of overextracted spots is reduced, thus reducing the extraction, but making it more even? The increase in time may be an indicator of more of the puck resistance, which forces water to disperse more evenly.🤔
@simonw43046 ай бұрын
Interesting, when you hear folks suggesting that lighter tamps yield better results with a lever (La Pavoni)
@Phil_OG6 ай бұрын
8:09 Why is the force not equal as long as the spring is fully compressed?
@TomJones-tx7pb6 ай бұрын
Having used two spring tampers extensively, I can say I don't think they improve anything and can cause puck prep to be inferior. The Normcore, for example has some play in it which means if there is variability in the density of the puck it will go with it and produce an uneven tamp, and a second tamp will not fix it that much. Also, the spring pushback is proportional to how much you have compressed the spring, so it is not really giving you a consistent pressure, which is irrelevant if you have tamped hard enough - in other words it is a marketing gimmick. oh and I should add that the Normcore play is more in one direction than another, so if you do a tamp, and then rotate the tamper and do a second tamp it will reduce the impact of the play.
@smokeslices2983 ай бұрын
I’m leaving this video a little confused. How many pounds of pressure should I tamp at? And is it important to have a tamper that I can change the pressure?
@ACE7F226 ай бұрын
Put simply, I can not get consistent extraction with a Flair 58, using needle distribution and a high quality hand grinder, medium roast, when I tamp to "full compression". I found I get much better flow and consistency if I stop applying pressure when I stop feeling the compression. So this leads me to believe there is a very clear optimum pressure to not exceed when brewing at a consistent 9 bars. This idea that you can not over temp, has been driving me crazy for months until I decided to let up on it.
@pantac44935 ай бұрын
I can fully tamp with my flair pro without issues. Did you try a courser grind?
@ACE7F225 ай бұрын
@@pantac4493 So I was doing this for months, and my conical grinder has somewhere around 240 stepped settings. I found fresh coffee had to be ground at 36 from 0(lowest/finest setting), while towards the end of my canister, I could do 34 without choking it. Still, with these micro adjustments, I wasn't getting good flow, it either ran straight through, or it would choke, leaving me to believe there has to be some amount of space left in the puck for expansion, or something. I was getting very inconsistent results that didn't look good, until I started letting up on the pressure, stopping once I couldn't feel compression.
@MichaelKire6 ай бұрын
So in short. Extraction happens with water flow, not saturation? So the more water that touches a piece of coffee bean the more likely it is to be able to pull out flavors from it. But which flavors goes where?
@WillBrownepigenomics6 ай бұрын
Brilliant work Lance. Thank you :-)
@FaithAndCoffeeBean6 ай бұрын
Thank you professor Lance 😎👍🏽☕️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@lovesonification6 ай бұрын
What would happen if you divided the basket in say 6 sections so All 6 sections. you would fill with grinded coffee …the sections walls not as high as the basket so you still could tamp. Think about !
@nat2world6 ай бұрын
very cool, thanks!! (by the way, love the color filter on this video :) )
@TsvetanVR6 ай бұрын
Grinding at a pretty grind fine. :D 13:40 I have actually noticed that about tamping. Not because I'm super advanced espresso maker but because I'm stuck for the moment with super cheap gear like a bottomless filter that's not completely flat on the bottom and a simple steel tamper that's not auto-levelling or anything. So I'm not able to make a perfectly level puck from the first tamp every time and I thought I did notice a difference when I've tamped multiple times to get there compared to the shots tamped level after only a single tamp. I guess it's actually true and not just in my head. It might also be much more pronounced in my case as I'm using 19 grams of coffee for my shots and that's a super thick puck in a 51mm portafilter compared to the standard 58mm most of you guys use.
@VyssaTV6 ай бұрын
13:39 we're grinding at a pretty grind find 👀
@marifemarcelo66966 ай бұрын
thanks master for the advice and knowledge
@JoeGotta6 ай бұрын
I always tamp with 30 pounds of downward force. I notice no difference in my shots if I tamp once versus twice.
@Highflo6 ай бұрын
6:30 uneven tamp
@LanceHedrick6 ай бұрын
I'll be sure to tell Hugo, who made that b roll. Probably a massive issue for the crux of the video lol
@jarvis39485 ай бұрын
Good stuff as usual Lance! Will you continue double tamping after seeing the results?
@andrewwdouglas6 ай бұрын
auto tampers like the puqpress double tamp and probably their RD already knew about this (they just didn't tell anyone). I started doing it a while back because I noticed a second tamp tended to clean the tamper of any bits stuck to it but I was less concerned about a more even tamp so the second tamp was always a bit lighter
@MrMartyn12126 ай бұрын
Hey Lance ,I do a triple tamp with a 20lb hammer 😺I call it the basket breaker
@vladimirrodaev98186 ай бұрын
Next video: do you need to put coffee grounds into your portafilter?
@Villaboy785 ай бұрын
Low key Lance just challenged us to go beyond 30lbs and max density Can we make a Black hole puck ?
@josephcarew49666 ай бұрын
As a philosopher, I absolutely love how you just threw “a priori” in! Next time you could sneak in how there are no a priori synthetic judgments possible in coffee. 😂
@LanceHedrick6 ай бұрын
Tell me you, too, went from analytic to continental? Lol
@endoalley680Ай бұрын
Is it 30 pounds pressure per area of a 58mm portafilter? Or is it 30 pounds per square inch pressure?
@liiich61756 ай бұрын
I sometimes experiment with zero tamping but leveling flat then seeing the puck fill quicker then drop the pressure to let it bloom out (using a flair classic with the pressure gauge). I do find a more uneven puck at the end (not parallel). So I wonder if proper distribution (WDT or those mechanical ones) and a quick turn off to the flow potentially doing anything? I use a normcore for my main machine and yeah once you keep pushing you will limit the spring and end up pushing more then the spring is rated for. Ive been double tamping (after turning the tamper 90' to help clean off the sides) But I doubt I would double tamp with not a self leveling tamp
@johnlarrivee36654 ай бұрын
Great video as usual you are a Mad Scientist lol, I have a question what brand is that black porta filter? It looks like it lays flat and doesn’t need to be held when tamping, thanks for the help
@001AWEI5 ай бұрын
Hi Lance, Thanks for sharing the video and greetings from Taiwan. I'd like to ask a few questions about using "The Force Tamper". First, should I tamp twice for better extraction? I've heard that this can help to create a more even distribution of coffee grounds, which can lead to a better cup of coffee. Second, will tamping twice affect the coffee density? I'm concerned that it might make the coffee too dense, which could lead to a bitter or over-extracted cup of coffee. Any insights you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, BR Rick
@KrabllllFroYo6 ай бұрын
every time you think you doing something right in your puck prep, "Hello, Lance Hendrick here here is why you doing XXXX wrong"
@justinbouchard6 ай бұрын
don't make me throw a tamper tantrum! love from canada as always :) also, i have to confess that i broke away from coffee for a week or so to touch grass and drink some tea. earl grey specifically, because it's yummy. it was actually really refreshing to come back to coffee and got me out of autopilot in a sense with it
@AAkCN15 ай бұрын
Love the videos. Am wondering about the 8-10 „KgF“ at the end. Is that an equivalent to „F = 8-10Kg“?
@woshigepro25 ай бұрын
i have been tamping like mad to avoid variance. i find that to work very well for me
@neddyknacker6 ай бұрын
All this is great but I just want to know how to stop the grounds building up on the bottom of my normcore v4. Driving me nuts.
@nickclarke76225 ай бұрын
Sounds like a new horror film - “The Barista Always Tamps Twice”!☕️😱😊😂
@cheekster7776 ай бұрын
Hope you’re well, Lance. Thank you my friend.
@rwjazz12996 ай бұрын
One word comes to mind: Convoluted. As with all coffee preparations, there’s no set theory; there’s no set of rules; there’s no set of arguments that’s going to make it easy for us. coffee/tamping/water quality/brew pressure/shot time/shot temp/grind quality/dumb luck.
@TheOriginal_BigMac6 ай бұрын
I don't know what to think any more
@TeeLichtet6 ай бұрын
Wonder what a tool that "hammers" the puck with a high frequency would be able to achieve as it could both press and "shake" the grounds into position. Kind of the same as the pneumatic hammers they use to densify cobble/sand pathways.
@avrc92856 ай бұрын
we are definitely overthinking this ... but hey great content :)
@Pekz00r6 ай бұрын
I see that you have the new CANAL portafilter. Do you like it? Is there a video coming up about that? Have tested the Meticulous version as well?
@clawdawg72486 ай бұрын
Picked up the Happy Tamper on your recommendation. It’s so damn consistent it feels like cheating.
@Slitch-nl16 ай бұрын
Great video! Could double tamping aid in mitigating suction caused by lifting the tamper?
@samuelpearson5 ай бұрын
I night thee, Legend Lance...
@wingedtoast74956 ай бұрын
is the endgame gonna end up being finding some relationship between say coffee matter density vs permeability (over time ig, there's probably some hydostatic component regarding impedance of co2 release)? maybe the actual density of the coffee plays a role in mediating the puck resistance vs volume, as opposed to a numeric density from trying to pack the coffee as efficiently as possible might be interesting to play with high grown vs low grown coffee for that. maybe i'm rambling and have no idea what i'm talking about but its fun to think about, lots of love
@grayoneil30516 ай бұрын
Question for the coffee community! Sorry for the non video specific question but I’m going backpacking in a couple weeks and want to find the best minimalist coffee to bring. I usually pre-grind some coffee the night before and use my aeropress go but I’m letting someone use my bigger backpack and will have much less space to pack luxuries. I was considering getting a bottle of Jot ultra coffee or looking into some more premium instant options. Anyone have any recommendations/suggestions?? I will have a backpacking stove to boil water.
@razraz54746 ай бұрын
Love your videos
@mhmmd_arsal2 ай бұрын
so, which tamper is better? with spring or not?
@xylemutopia6 ай бұрын
Thanks lance! Love the videos. Now I'm thinking of returning my normcore tamper I got a couple weeks ago 😂
@isfiyiywafibc6qaiiiiiiiiii5706 ай бұрын
The tamping pressure inconsistency is going to be just about the same as the tamping pressure inconsistency of the decent tamper. Don't worry about it. What Lance is pointing out is that a 15lb, 25lb or 30lb spring isn't going to actually hit 15, 25 or 30 pounds of force except for when the compressed puck has a specific amount of headroom. But the reality is that 25 lbs spring is more than enough to get well into the "consistent maximum compression" range unless you're seriously under-dosing your basket. The important part of the normcore tamper is that it tamps level. And if you want to turn it into a decent tamper then I imagine an appropriately sized piece of pipe section could be swapped in for the existing force spring to remove the variability caused by the spring.
@xylemutopia6 ай бұрын
@@isfiyiywafibc6qaiiiiiiiiii570 oh cool! thanks for pointing that out! That makes me feel better about my purchase. Thank you!
@pantac44936 ай бұрын
@@isfiyiywafibc6qaiiiiiiiiii570 that’s a great point of removing the spring if it’s not stiff enough and just adding a solid pipe