Since people keep asking - lets have a look at how a final battle between the Grand Fleet and the High Seas Fleet could have gone. Want to talk about ships? / discord Want to support the channel? - / drachinifel
Пікірлер: 920
@ajvanmarle5 жыл бұрын
I think the variant where Seymour messed up and the battle never happened is the more realistic one.
@BoisegangGaming2 жыл бұрын
Honestly Flag Officer Seymour seems like he deserves an entire comedy based around his complete and utter incompetence.
@JonatasAdoM2 жыл бұрын
If anythingc that would ironically have been the preferred outcome
@jonathanstrong4812 Жыл бұрын
@@JonatasAdoM Seymour which who was a coward pure and simple
"Florida is being evacuated." That's a sentence I've heard a lot.
@tobiaszczarnota78793 жыл бұрын
#floridaman
@skeletonwguitar43833 жыл бұрын
#hurricanestate
@benrobertson78552 жыл бұрын
Yeh and nz is under the yellow flag , for another 2 years,! But wait now it doesn’t matter…. How’s COVID political …to let me ask what happened to our global position while we had our heads so far down in the sand??? Guessing we won’t being getting a visit from some of our new post biggest trade partners…..
@JonatasAdoM2 жыл бұрын
"Florida is under water!"
@jeffreyskoritowski4114 Жыл бұрын
In other news, the crew of an American battleship was removed after receiving irreparable damage from Imperial German forces.
@sd501st55 жыл бұрын
Flag Officer Seymour, you are hereby presented the Iron Cross 2nd class.
@demos1135 жыл бұрын
The lad committed suicide four years to late.... make that six, i forgot Jutland. o___O
@dunamoose34464 жыл бұрын
Took me a sec to get xD
@wingcommanderbob82684 жыл бұрын
@@demos113 I don't think wishing an early suicide on him is fair. Being discharged for general incompetence, maybe.
@YoungGarrett4 жыл бұрын
@@wingcommanderbob8268 No, he did commit suicide in real life in 1922.
@wingcommanderbob82684 жыл бұрын
@@YoungGarrett the person i replied to suggested him commiting suicide six years earlier... that is why i said "early" suicide...
@bairdrew6 жыл бұрын
TFW the description gets to 1130hrs and you imagine the sight of the Grand Fleet steaming in all its fury, led by the Queen Elizabeth class battleships. *RULE BRITANNIA INTENSIFIES* 1350hrs HMS Warspite leads the whole fleet, despising all the hard knocks of war *RULE BRITANNIA INTENSIFIES FURTHER* In all seriousness, this is a pretty fair appraisal. The German sailors by 1918 knew there was no point in wasting their lives in an impossible assault, and the wargaming examplifies why.
@Halinspark5 жыл бұрын
Rule Britannia, accompanied a metal rendition of Anchors Aweigh as Texas follows right behind, spitting fire from her funnel.
@willrogers37935 жыл бұрын
Halinspark I’d go more with “The Yellow Rose of Texas” being played by 50 banjos and a full marching band simultaneously.
@AnvilAirsoftTV5 жыл бұрын
bairdrew my heart was fluttering away listening to the narrative. Could see the battle ensigns flapping.
@Mikalent Жыл бұрын
"The BB Texas, perturbed at being overtaken...." if there was ever a sentence of how a Texan captain would ever feel about having his BB, named after his home state, being overtaken by a British BB, the only one more likely would be that sentence, followed by "... the Texas opened fire on the British ship."
@onewhosaysgoose48315 жыл бұрын
18:40 Was listening to this in the background, but the captaining of the USS Texas forced me to tab back to like and comment. Only disappointed they didn't manage 22.55 knots by getting the oars out.
@kainhall4 жыл бұрын
they burned the oars......
@1TruNub2 жыл бұрын
@@thomasbernecky2078 Captain: tell the chief engineer to shovel faster I want more speed XO: but sir, well wreck our engines Captain: do I look like I care you think I'm going to be overtaken by the limeys
@1TruNub2 жыл бұрын
@@kainhall I'm getting tired to the Caribbean curse of the Black Pearl vibes run out the sweeps
@Bufoferrata6 жыл бұрын
Damn! That was some BRILLIANT play-by-play. I was listening to the audio without watching my PC screen. The "graphics" weren't really necessary because the narration was absolutely gripping. BRAVO Sir!
@kylieadams54146 жыл бұрын
I would very much enjoy more of this! I get it's not an easy video to make, but this was fantastic.
@athopi5 жыл бұрын
You should read, "Sink The Bismark" an account by a British junior officer who served in the fleet. Covers the timeline of events and brings together what the different units were doing as Bismark and Prinz Eugene made their Atlantic foray. Even details like King George V leaving port with civilian workers still aboard because she was so new and unfinished. It's a great read!
@Bufoferrata5 жыл бұрын
@@athopi : Thanks for the recommendation. I read it when I was ten. It's a great book. It really focuses on the human element. BTW, it was Prince of Wales that sortied with the civilian builders making adjustments to her turrets. Cheers!
@tonyromano62205 жыл бұрын
Bufoferrata yes they were fantastic oratory
@Don18k5 жыл бұрын
@@Bufoferrata I was on HMS Belfast when she was doing trials in 1959, she had builders workmen on board, about 12- 15 men from what I recall
@dougauzene83894 жыл бұрын
30 Seconds ln: "BATTLE OF JUTLAND 2 - ELECTRIC BOOGALO" - FREAKIN' PRICELESS, My Friend, Especially ln That Voice!
@johnwhite72196 жыл бұрын
Loved it when Texas was being towed in . I live in Houston and she's right here. Been aboard her many times.
@tibbits00186 жыл бұрын
18:16 "over there" starts playing in the distance.
@loganb70595 жыл бұрын
Kasen Miller Admiral Hipper: *confused screeching*
@gilbertosantos28064 жыл бұрын
The US General on the South Carolina: *PREPARE YOUR AINIS FOR MY PAINIS*
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
*SEND THE WORD SEND THE WORD*
@jackthorton103 жыл бұрын
The Yanks are Coming!
@kommandantgalileo3 ай бұрын
The yanks are coming, With drums rum tumming everywhere.
@casselsc4 жыл бұрын
Easily my favorite video you’ve ever produced. I love your description of the USS Texas entering the battle and the participation of the USS Arkansas, my grandfather’s ship from WWII.
@datgood1216 жыл бұрын
Lord i never thought i would get so excited over a hypothetical battle. Even though im not American, when i hear you said that the german look out spotted ships with a strange mast. I cant help but get really excited. Well done m8, this video made my day.
@Soundwave35915 жыл бұрын
The Texas coming thundering out of the Smoke because it was impatient to get Into the fight is such an American move, I love it. Greetings from Boston!
@loganb70592 жыл бұрын
The fact that it destroys its engines in the process lives rent free in my head. I love returning to this video every now and again.
@jordanpeterson5140 Жыл бұрын
I mean, it REALLY is the most Texas thing ever...both for the ship and her namesake state.
@jeffreyskoritowski4114 Жыл бұрын
@@loganb7059 I usually rewatch this every other month.
@krullachief669 Жыл бұрын
@@jordanpeterson5140 "Those fuckers started the fight without me. Well I'll show them!" is indeed a very Texas thing.
@Illnorean4 ай бұрын
*Bullwhip crack* “YEEEEEEHAW!” That’s roughly what I was picturing.
@sirrliv6 жыл бұрын
A fascinating video. I know I'm a bit late getting to it, but I thoroughly enjoyed this What-If exercise answering a question I myself have asked in my head many times. A few points that particularly stood out to me: I'm surprised that Derfflinger was able to survive as long as it did with such a spectacular turret fire blazing forward. One would have thought it would have been a matter of seconds, minutes as most, before those flames reached her main magazine, but she kept going long enough to at least contribute a bit more before succumbing. One can only imagine the desperate action below decks of damage control crews with firehoses trying to keep the flames at bay long enough to flood the foreward magazine and save the ship from exploding as the British battlecruisers did at Jutland. Not gonna lie, my heart swelled with pride when the British battlefleet (or at least the American contingent) was being led by the overtaxed piston engines of my home state's flagship, the USS Texas. Historically, she was always the first into the fight and the last to leave during the Second World War, even flooding her own torpedo bulge to get a last few shots in at Normandy, even overstraining her engines similar to this in 1946 during Operation Magic Carpet to ensure that American servicemen from the Pacific would get home in time for Christmas. Some have pointed out that the spark-filled black smoke clouds may be inaccurate as the Texas was oil fired, but I can believe that detail as the engineers forcing the boilers' oil burners open beyond their normal limits to pour on every ounce of fuel, leading to some of it not burning properly and forming an impromptu smokescreen. And later in the battle I can also agree with the Americans accepting the temporary leadership of HMS Warspite, more than likely the only British dreadnought even they would respect. My biggest surprise was the crucial contribution of the K Class submarines. Long derided as next to useless, even by your own good self, I was shocked that they would be the element to turn the tide of this battle, and I must admit somewhat validated; had they been designed stronger with better maneuvering capabilities, the idea of a steam submarine in the First World War era is not as daft as it sounds, especially as the K's boilers were specially designed to be shut down and fired up quite rapidly. That said, historically their crush depth (if memory serves) was less than twice their own length, which they could reach quite easily through uncontrollable dives. As such, it also seems accurate that four of them were lost without a trace during the engagement. But at least they got their moment of glory that was denied them in real life, leaving them an undeserving historical laughing stock.
@Drachinifel6 жыл бұрын
Derfflinger's fate was in some ways similar to Seydlitz at Dogger Bank, everything in the turret cooked off, but enough safety provisions allowed them to flood the magazine in time. Texas was originally coal powered, her oil fired boilers wouldn't be installed until the mid'20's so in this battle she's still powered by coal :) Thanks for the long feedback post!
@GlorfindelofGondolin6 жыл бұрын
Woohoo! Come on Texas! Love that old girl. I got back from morning PT to be greeted by this. You had me laughing so hard when you said that Texas was blowing boilers to take the lead of the squadron. Lol, great video. Keep it up!
@deetroittony6 жыл бұрын
Of course us Yanks are going to make sure we do everything to upstage the limeys. I almost died when I heard you say that the Texas was pulling away and leading the formation.
@Drachinifel6 жыл бұрын
There's a bit of a story there, one of our group is from South Carolina so we immediately voted him commander of 6th Battle Squadron. (key posts got their own commanders). When word of the battlecruiser fight reached the Grand Fleet 'Beatty' ordered the fleet to proceed to assist with all speed. The commander of 5th BS took the chance to use his ships greater speed to tear off asap, whereas in theory 6th BS should have been leading as they were the westernmost squadron. Cue our American friend ordering his own ships to full speed, then upon being told he wasn't as fast, he asked "could we go faster if we dumped everything we can physically throw overboard that isn't a gun, and run the engines as hard as they will go without exploding in the next few hours?" We did some quick checking and figured he could get an extra knot or two, and so off the Texas charged with the engines almost jumping off their mounts. :p I won't recount some of the colourful language he came out with once he was told he was I'm range of the HSF.😁
@deetroittony6 жыл бұрын
@@Drachinifel that is damn funny. the only thing I can think about is the old farmer with the compass on the Japanese submarine in the movie 1942 singing the Yanks are coming.
@armchairwarlord6 жыл бұрын
"We have not yet begun to steam." - Admiral Rodman
@RussBeatle636 жыл бұрын
The Dracher may have used the USS Texas as a bit of comedy relief amongst the absolute carnage we listened to (20,000 + dead either side?) but breaking down in heat of battle is easily possible for Texas and New York circa 1918. 1972 book of WW1 battleships has this: "The recurrent problems with Turbine design came to a head when tenders came for the New York Class. After a drawn out wrangle the Bureau of ships took the unique step and went back to reciprocating machinery to show that the US Navy would not be blackmailed".....you really know your stuff Dracher! thanks!
@nitehawk865 жыл бұрын
When he said it was an "unusually large tower", I knew it was those goofy nuclear reactor cooling tower looking things that the Standard-Class battleships all had at the time. Somehow I just new it would be Texas leading the charge. :)
@captaindusty48846 жыл бұрын
HMS New Zealand living up to her lucky ship status
@Drachinifel6 жыл бұрын
Direct quote from game #4 between 'von Reuter' and one of the 'signalman': "check targets at rear of line" "Visibility improved since time of last report. Indefatigable class, likely New Zealand, leading two larger vessels of unknown configuration, many shell splashes larger the 12" guns" "how many salvos fired and how many hits?" " -(Describes efforts on other rearward BC's)- Target New Zealand, 12 salvos fired, range established on salvo 4, hits registered, 0" "*$@* this, shoot at something that doesn't have divine protection" "Seydlitz will engage next target in line." :p
@brianspendelow8406 жыл бұрын
A very well deserved reputation that many thought was Maori magic.
@suflanker456 жыл бұрын
I believe I read about how the captain of the New Zealand was presented with a traditional Maori "good luck charm" to be worn in battle which he wore at Jutland. I would say the Maori are strong with the force.
@ahseaton83535 жыл бұрын
The captain had a Maori warriors skirt and a jade tiki pendant as good luck charms. During Jutland with all the other battle cruisers blowing up, one officer double checked w the bridge crew to confirm the captain was wearing them and they survived without a scratch.
@raptormaster6665 жыл бұрын
@@Drachinifel Us Kiwis are weird like that. Congrats for making me cry with laughter.
@doccyclopz6 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention the erecting of a 100' Statue of Lord Beatty, 1st Baron Texel, erected in Trafalgar Square (Rumour has it that his Lordship paid for the final 90' ) ;)
@Zarastro545 жыл бұрын
doccyclopz made from the melted down Krupp steel of the surrendered German battleships. ;)
@moritamikamikara38794 жыл бұрын
o god
@ryanfrederick33763 жыл бұрын
Viscount Texel
@MaxwellAerialPhotography3 жыл бұрын
Wouldn’t that be a fucking sight.
@alganhar16 жыл бұрын
An enjoyable and plausible scenario, I like the fact you wargamed it out multiple times, True you likely enjoyed it, but wargaming is a valid method of testing out tactics and scenarios that was, and still is used by militaries around the world.
@roboticus716 жыл бұрын
Fantastic work. I'll be rewatching/listening a few more times. This battle scenario would be mind boggling made in big budget movie form.
@leoamery4 жыл бұрын
For those interested, Arthur Conan Doyle wrote a long short story about this battle that might have been called "The Death Voyage" collected in UNCOLLECTED STORIES published in 1982. The outcome was the same as Drach's splendid speculation, but the battle considerably different.
@vespelian52746 жыл бұрын
It's interesting to speculate what the psychological implications of a decisive Trafalgar type victory might have been for the British navy and people. The unsatisfactory victory of Jutland was a massive disappointed. 'The spell of Trafalgar had been broken' leaving the Royal Navy with a feeling it had failed in its task to destroy its enemy rather than to slowly and ingloriously strangle it: perhaps this has been evident ever since, even now. How might such a victory as the Texel have effected the future London and Washington treaties? Might Britain's attitude have been more robust perhaps? Might the unhealthy feeling of Britain being in perpetual decline since the Great War have been averted by such a 'clean' victory. Victory at such a late stage in the war could not have have averting Britain's decline as a first class power, as with the rapid reduction in Royal Navy's strength post WWI, Britain could no longer maintain its previous two power standard. With the new and powerful US fleet now astride Britain's far eastern imperial sea route and a newly powerful Japanese navy ensconced in its heartland the writing for British Imperial power was already on the wall.
@bairdrew6 жыл бұрын
I don't think it would have made that much of a difference in terms of tonnage tbqh. At least so far as the heavy mob goes. The most reasonable change I forsee would be the scrapping of the R-class in the mid 1920s and their replacement with a tranche of 5 newer battleships that would serve as an intermediary class between the Nelson twins and the KGV class. There'd probably be more effort put in to destroyers and light cruisers tbqh, which the RN had decided were overall the more important ship types (and they were quite right in that). With a bit of luck, assuming the Flying Squadron did something of use in the hypothetical (I don't remember hearing them mentioned) the RN might put some more serious consideration in to it's carrier forces.
@aker19935 жыл бұрын
It will also reinforce to the US navy to have a battlecruiser after the battle and also accelerate the development of fast battleships and carries
@Jaxck775 жыл бұрын
Vespelian I suspect it would have made the Japanese much more likely to come to the table with the British, to reaffirm their alliance rather than abandon it to claim British possessions in SE Asia. It's unlikely Germany would've built any kind of surface fleet in WWII, especially no battleships, which would've made the Atlantic convoys much safer and the Battle of Britain even easier.
@Knirin5 жыл бұрын
@@Jaxck77 I wouldn't bet money on no german battle ships helping the Atlantic convoys out. Both the Bismarck and the Tirpitz have combined a displacement of about 80 times the displacement of a single Type IXC U-boat submarine built at the end of the war. Yes that isn't a completely direct comparison but the steel from those two ships alone would have probably doubled the number of total Type IXC subs built. With double the number of subs available it is certainly possible that the war in the Atlantic could have turned out differently in the early part of the war.
@themadhammer33055 жыл бұрын
@@bairdrew also with how well the subs did during the battle, it might lead Britain to look further into developing that arm of the navy, also into developing better torpedo defences and submarine hunting gear earlier
@pshehan15 жыл бұрын
Pleased that HMAS Australia got a look in at this battle. It had missed Jutland because it was being repaired after a collision with sister ship of the Indefatigable class, HMS New Zealand. Note that is His Majesty's Australian Ship Australia, as it was the flagship of the Royal Australian Navy. HMS New Zealand was paid for by that Dominion but was gifted to the Royal Navy, intended for the China Station, but was released by the New Zealand government at the request of the Admiralty for service in British waters before the war. HMAS Australia was 'unlucky' in the sense that unlike New Zealand it saw little action. At the start of World War I, Australia was tasked with finding and destroying the German East Asia Squadron, which was prompted to withdraw from the Pacific by the battlecruiser's presence. The commander of the German squadron said that only the presence of Australia prevented him from shelling Australian ports in the early months of the war. So it did solid service for the country in the inglorious role of a deterrent Repeated diversions to support the capture of German colonies in New Guinea and Samoa, as well as an overcautious Admiralty, prevented the battlecruiser from engaging the German squadron before the latter's destruction. Australia was then assigned to North Sea operations, which consisted primarily of patrols and exercises, until the end of the war. Australia only ever fired in anger twice: at a German merchant vessel in January 1915, and at a suspected submarine contact in December 1917. It was sunk outside Sydney heads in 1924 in compliance with the Washington Naval Treaty.
@Cloudman5725 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the extra info- most interesting. I do like the way you phase statement of "unlucky", well done, it is too easy as wargamers to at times to forget that real life war is not pretty.
@Septimus_ii5 жыл бұрын
So even though it never engaged a major enemy, it did sterling work defending Australia and the rest of the empire
@DarkFire5155 жыл бұрын
Awesome video! Had to laugh at the description of HMS Agincourt's "turret farm" he he :)
@Spaceman333934 жыл бұрын
When you see the profile view the high seas Fleet and think, "looks a bit small for the page." When you see the Grand Fleet," that's why it's so big"
@RadioactiveSherbet6 жыл бұрын
Great show, as always! I particularly enjoyed the blooper reel part where the battle starts and immediately goes sideways in spectacular fashion with a German battleship blowing up and getting rammed by 3 other ships. That bit was hilarious!
@lok3kobold5 жыл бұрын
A lovely battle report of the what-if scenario. I am a bit surprised all the K-class submarines didn't have Torpedo duds, hydraulic failures and horrible friendly collision accidents as it would have been more in light of their historical performance
@haroldhenderson28245 жыл бұрын
When I need something to "lift my spirits", I play this video (starting around 18:00).
@heneagedundas Жыл бұрын
I love how New Zealand comes through unscathed again.
@DaveSCameron Жыл бұрын
Other than Crete and Gallipoli you're peerless 😂
@gunny4196 жыл бұрын
I request a part 2 from the Grand fleet's point of View
@jonsouth15456 жыл бұрын
hell yeah
@bairdrew5 жыл бұрын
*Hearts of Oak intensifies*
@Voltstorm02072 жыл бұрын
"Agincourt is down to only 3 turrets" With any other battleship that would still be most of its turrets.
@chrisoddy87442 жыл бұрын
In the case of later ships (1930s built/WW2 era) 3 turrets often constituted the *entire* main battery. Four turreted ships were either old (Warspite, Guilio Cesare, Kongo, etc) or unusual (Bismarck, Vanguard).
@kommandantgalileo3 ай бұрын
Agincourt is the only ship we can say that with "only".
@ZeDoctorTod6 жыл бұрын
Had I known I was going to voice Admiral Scheer, I would've made it even better. I feel cheated.
@johnd2058 Жыл бұрын
This is great! Thanks from the state of New York.
@DaveSCameron Жыл бұрын
He is one of finest channels without doubt 🇬🇧🙏🇺🇸📚
@georgeking63565 жыл бұрын
Actually breathtaking especially as each side attempts to do things that might have happened at Jutland with unexpected or absolutely expected outcomes. Thanks. More like history and than history.
@stevemartiniussen68065 жыл бұрын
Absolutely fantastic. I’d love to hear more of these on other battles like Leyte gulf, midway etc. Imagine if Yamato and Musashi had actually engaged. Great channel
@warwatcher915 жыл бұрын
You might be interested in this then: www.chuckhawks.com/task_force_34.htm
@fezzpop84106 жыл бұрын
I'm a simple American, I hear USS Texas I up vote! Lol
@1TruNub5 жыл бұрын
Yes specially After she racked her boilers to out run the Queen Elizabeths
@Dave_Sisson5 жыл бұрын
I have trouble believing that an American admiral of the time would take orders from a superior officer of any other nationality. On the Western Front US generals were infamous for their unwillingness to be directed by UK or French field marshals, so in this battle I can imagine the Americans are more likely to wander around doing their own thing rather than being integrated into a British squadron like the Australians were.
@mikeholton98765 жыл бұрын
@@1TruNub she's still floating, are any of the ships she was chasing that can say the same???? nope.
@DangerTurtle915 жыл бұрын
mike holton she's barely floating due to neglect but there are plans to give her a permanent dry land home sort of like mikasa in Japan
@clivemilne77875 жыл бұрын
I see "simple American"... I down vote.
@jonsouth15456 жыл бұрын
probably the most brutal naval battle ever
@jimtalbott95355 жыл бұрын
Suggestion: Do a "war game" type assessment like this, but for the Austro-Hungarian vs. Italian fleets at different times - 1916, 1917, etc. Sounds like fun!
@Foxtrot_UniformCharlieKilo Жыл бұрын
"5 minute guide to warships" *34:45* Love the vids btw
@BrassSpyglass6 жыл бұрын
So Texel becomes the last time a fleet surrenders at sea instead of Tsushima. The Americans help lead the Van and show they aren't the weak link. Awesome
@bairdrew5 жыл бұрын
Well if were being technical the 5th BS lead the van as they overtook the whole Grand Fleet to rush to the aid of the battlecruiser squadron. And by the end of the battle Warspite remained the vanguard of the whole fleet.
@erichvonmanstein68762 жыл бұрын
@@bairdrew did you not see he said help
@Wolfeson286 жыл бұрын
Definitely a great video, and I'd love to see more of these in the future (though obviously they take a lot more time and work than most of your others). I'd love to hear how people reacted in that one scenario where Seymour hoisted the wrong signal. The people playing the British commanders must've been *pissed.*
@Drachinifel6 жыл бұрын
It was quite the sight to behold. Everyone on the British side was getting suspicious as they could hear the other two scenarios being run at the same time engaging, and they'd done nothing but sail. Then they got reports from Tyrwhitt that the Thames force was being engaged by the HSF, checked their position, and rage ensured.
@RedXlV5 жыл бұрын
@@Drachinifel Rather than having Seymour shot and dumped overboard, I'd suggest keel-hauling him in that scenario.
@jonathanstrong4812 Жыл бұрын
@@RedXlV He was a coward he was a good flag lieutenant in peacetime Helgoland Bight Dogger Bank and Jutland he was a coward and purblind idiot
@daveawesomesauce772 Жыл бұрын
I would love to watch more of these tabletop theory based “battle reports”. Amazing work, thank you.
@shadowfire2464 жыл бұрын
This is the 3rd time I've watched this now and it's still just as exciting as it was the first time.
@hfshim5 жыл бұрын
USS Texas running like hell to keep up with the British-that would be a one hell of a scene, I tell you!
@FLashman-cv5dn5 жыл бұрын
Fantastic stuff really enjoyed watching this very well researched and very plausible scenario with a sprinkling of wit and banter. Cheers Drachinifel
@riggaden42484 жыл бұрын
Excellent episode. I do like the extended hypothetical's with time lapsed diagrams and backed up by war gaming. Thanks Drachinifel, et al.
@deetroittony6 жыл бұрын
Good morning from Detroit. That was a brilliant episode!!! Great job
@f4fwildcat296 жыл бұрын
Kalamazoo here!
@deetroittony6 жыл бұрын
@@f4fwildcat29 hi kalamazoo. How are you doing today
@f4fwildcat296 жыл бұрын
@@deetroittony doing alright. Getting a fall break from college right in the middle of October which is weird, but gives me time to play more tabletop naval games! How's Detroit?
@deetroittony6 жыл бұрын
@@f4fwildcat29 overcast and 40. I'm at work. You know I've never played table top naval games
@shellshockedgerman39475 жыл бұрын
Detroit doesn't exist.
@alexbush21835 жыл бұрын
Such a cool scenario , would definitely love to see more of these kinds of video
@ronaldderooij17746 жыл бұрын
the Netherlands were not occupied in WW1. Probably the warships of waring parties would be seized, but NL was not hostile to anybody at the time.
@Wombat19166 жыл бұрын
Ronald de Rooij My ears pricked up when we were told that part of the Dutch coast was under German control. My (Dutch) wife confirmed that The Netherlands were neutral and unoccupied.
@Cloudman5725 жыл бұрын
You are totally correct and Drachinifel sorts this as below. To quote him in the comments section: "EDIT: Additionally, as a few have pointed out, the Dutch coast was NOT occupied in WW1, this came about from a transcription error in my notes as we had designated the Dutch coast 'hostile' for the purposes of denoting that ships that went ashore were not recoverable, but the shorthand used made me think for some reason that meant 'occupied' when recording. "
@calvinstudzinski70912 жыл бұрын
I find it odd that the U-boats had no effect, but the k-class subs had such consistent success. Were there any scenarios in which German U-boats damaged the Grand Fleet instead?
@jedimasterdraco69508 ай бұрын
In fairness, the U-boats are making attempts at intercepting throughout the open expanse of the North Sea while the K-class sail with the Grand Fleet and know more or less exactly where they can intercept the High Seas Fleet.
@andrewl51275 жыл бұрын
That was fascinating. Thank you. Amazing to hear that the K Class Submarines were likely to be useful :-)
@DaIssimo6 жыл бұрын
This was very well presented, nicely done!
@RemoteViewr15 жыл бұрын
I am not a naval forces interest person. However, you make it so detailed with clarity of narrative and analysis, I think you have drawn me in. Never regret watching your material. Best of all is your satisfying grasp of the subject matter. This piece had be absolutely fascinated. Thanks so very much for the military history. Love your dry sense of humor, especially references to we Americans cramming as much 2A expression on deck as possible, lol. Its in our d.n.a. again, great grasp of the material with understanding of the tech and human interactions with it.
@tobiaszczarnota78793 жыл бұрын
A bit earlier today, Me and my dad played a game about the battle. The game involved a pencil or pen and 2 pieces of paper. One paper is for the names of the ships. And the other the battle map. When a ship is lost, we draw out a cross and cross the ships name out. Back to the event. My dad was commanding the Germans, while I commanded the British. My dad lost 10 ships, while I lost 14. I also added 3 more American ships to the 6th Battle squadron, giving the British 38 battleships. And I also jumbled the Order of Battle up a bit. The events of the battle were thus: The battlecruiser action just happened and Hindenburg and Seydlitz retreated. The High Seas Fleet arrived, and the British battlecruisers retreated. So basically, the battle happened in the similar way to what you proposed, until the Grand Fleet arrived. The British began their encircling manoeuver, but the Germans responded by attempting the Nelson manoeuver. Nevertheless, the Prinzregent Luitpold went down to the british guns. But the Germans managed to sink Arkansas and Florida. Moments later, Nassau shares the same fate as Prinzregent Luitpold. The German Nelson tactic paid off at first, as Malaya, Wyoming, Utah and North Dakota all go down without much of a fight. The British split their forces, as Friedrich der Grosse also sinks. Thuringen explodes. The 3 remaining Kaisers still wreak havoc on the British battle line, sinking the Centurion and Thunderer, before taking out, Emperor of India, Benbow, Canada, Resolution and Royal Sovereign, all at the cost of the Kaiser and Konig Albert sinking, and Kaiserin straight up surrendering. Meanwhile, Barham and Valiant are taken out, but they sink the Konig, Bayern, Grosser Kurfurst and Kronprinz (Wilhelm), and also manage to severely damage Markgraf and Helgoland. Realising that their tactic failed miserably, the Germans ran away, as a melee between the screening forces develops and the British battlecruisers reappear. Eventually, all the ships of the High Seas Fleet retreated, and they would be forced to sail around the British Isles.
@chrisdragon79564 жыл бұрын
"it is the grand fleet" those words enough to make any proud britain weep with joy. this was an amazing war game i loved this video and finally the way jutland should have gone
@jackr2443 жыл бұрын
Aka “The riders of Rohan had arrived.”
@osarkthegoat70384 жыл бұрын
17:37 the USS Texas gets an EPIC introduction.
@T3hderk875 жыл бұрын
So I figured out Drach's methodology with the 5 minute episodes. With this one in particular, to achieve the 5 minute time stamp, one must watch this in 7x speed, thus achieving the namesake and moniker.
@MidKnight21426 жыл бұрын
With my lack of proper WW1/WW2 naval history and playing WoWs, when you talked about the Grosser Kerfurst, I was HOLY...the Grand Fleet survived facing that thing?! I was wondering how that could happen, especially cause I thought it was just a paper ship lol.
@slavohazucha52396 жыл бұрын
Wrong Grosser Kurfürst :) The WoWs version is a paper WWII BB, this one was a real 1913 BB, König class.
@MidKnight21426 жыл бұрын
Lol ya I gathered as much from the context, it was just the first thing to come to mind, then thinking about it in that particular battle for kicks and giggles.
@rob59445 жыл бұрын
I've read that it was the British preoccupation with rate of fire since the days of sail that led to safety practices being ignored at Jutland, leading to the catastrophic losses as mentioned.
@jerryslater34475 жыл бұрын
This is a good story, but the graphics might be Much more useful, by highlighting and identifying individual ships as they are mentioned, along with their visual arcs.
@purpleunicornmedia4 жыл бұрын
Excellent hypothetical thank you. Really appreciated the summary of outlier events at the end as well.
@shadowfire2465 жыл бұрын
Love you you paid close attention the American BBs they never got their claim to fame during ww1. You had me at the edge of my seat the entire battle. Great video.
@grathian3 жыл бұрын
Something I've noted in the accounts of most large period actions in the north sea is the environmental response to massive amounts of gunfire and hard steaming coal fired vessels operating in a restricted area for a significant period. (Not just the actual Jutland account). Visibility goes to hell after an hour or so. Difficult to wargame.
@Simon-dc2gr3 жыл бұрын
I watched the same video over and over again, but him saying 'It is the Grand fleet' always give me a chilling sensation.
@shanemize37753 жыл бұрын
While I always enjoy your videos, I found this one especially entertaining. It would have been so much a better end to the High Seas Fleet than to what actually happened. This was exceptionally well done! Please keep the outstanding videos coming and God bless you, my friend!
@craigpalmer91966 жыл бұрын
well the USN gets newer BB's !
@RedXlV5 жыл бұрын
With Arkansas and New York being unsalvageable as presented in this scenario, it's a safe bet that during the Washington Treaty negotiations, the US would've almost certainly insisted on being allowed to complete Washington and South Dakota to make up for them. (I wonder what names would've been assigned to BB-56 and BB-57 if those names were taken out of circulation.)
@treeshakertucker58405 жыл бұрын
@@RedXlV New York and Arkansas?
@ahseaton83535 жыл бұрын
Due to limited oil supplies, only the older coal fired 12" US battleships were sent to join the British Fleet
@a.morphous665 жыл бұрын
RedXlV I suppose they’d recycle the names of old pre-dreadnoughts, as they did with many other battleships. We might even see a new USS Maine.
@seawolf48464 жыл бұрын
@@RedXlV Don't forget the loss of Florida too
@workingguy66664 жыл бұрын
Electric Boogaloo mentioned in 2018, easily a year before the meme took over in America. Damn, Drach - so YOU'RE who started this!
@TK-fk4po4 жыл бұрын
One of the most interesting what if’s - the kind of thing I’d always wanted to read about.
@dreamer4665696 жыл бұрын
Awesome at its best. Thank you for wonderful videos.
@chrisgurney24675 жыл бұрын
Poor Lion, always a shell magnet XD
@spirz45573 жыл бұрын
Seydlitz : You get used to it.
@mikenyc15015 жыл бұрын
Very entertaining. Thank you for making this video
@colindunnigan86216 жыл бұрын
Yeah, that seems a likely outcome. As much as I think the HSF is cool, there were just too many Allied capital ships. I also totally sympathize with anybody striking their colors after the pounding those ships took.
@RedXlV5 жыл бұрын
The only way a last ride of the HSF could've accomplished anything would be if they managed to avoid fighting the assembled Grand Fleet. Like in that one scenario where the Grand Fleet went in the wrong direction because of a signal error and the HSF mauled some cruisers before retreating home.
@MozanaRN2 жыл бұрын
No mention of German reconnaissance capabilities via Zeppelin are taken into account in this scenario. Weather permitting, undoubtedly the Zeppelins would have been working with both U-boat forces and the German High Seas Fleet.
@niccologentile8674 жыл бұрын
Thinking about what you said here, and how hopeless a last stand was, I think the german crews at scapa scuttling they're own ships, is a much better coup de grace than this suicide.
@DeltaDemon13 жыл бұрын
I love these 35 minute 5-minute guides
@shingshongshamalama5 жыл бұрын
Just after midnight, Warspite sets a bad example and teaches the yanks how to bully cruisers.
@sfs20402 ай бұрын
Not mentioned: the bugler on USS Texas blaring a calvary charge as the ship surges forward right after he finished playing the call to General Quarters.
@richardscales95606 жыл бұрын
Mutiny or massacre. Mutiny wins everytime for me
@carolynhughes83645 жыл бұрын
Unless you come from a culture of military honor.ie japan,England and elite military forces.
@TheRogueLeader2 жыл бұрын
are we sure that the one K class that got turned around and shot at the aft end of the Grand Fleet was not French crewed??
@DaveSCameron Жыл бұрын
Mais non! 😂
@Elangeni16 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this terrific video! I really enjoyed it. Have you ever thought of wargaming Jutland if Jellicoe had turned towards Scheer instead of away in the face of the German torpedo attack?
@Drachinifel6 жыл бұрын
Haven't tried that one before, might be worth a go.
@panderson99242 жыл бұрын
After I watched the main battle part of the video, I was speechless. Alot of my favorite BBs and BCs like the Derfflinger and Konig Albert amongst others on both sides were gone, just sheer amount of ships sunk and damage and the fact that none of the german capital ships escaped really makes me sad. It's just a brutal, worse than hell fight for both sides. There's no glory in war, just death and destruction.
@akessel92train Жыл бұрын
Its a good thing this battle didn’t take place
@dayofmone6 жыл бұрын
If you want some pronounciation tips for German ship names, I'd gladly help out :)
@DawgPro4 жыл бұрын
Binging your clips, interesting enough to keep me clicking... but this one is quite good ! Can only offer my thanks.
@jackbharucha14755 жыл бұрын
Someone should really make an alternate history comic about this.
@zaphodtoasty92086 жыл бұрын
of course. the k class was a major part of the battle regardless of its preference of sinking in Scottish lochs. great video btw,
@connormclernon265 жыл бұрын
18:21 WITNESS ME
@kkhagerty63155 жыл бұрын
Connor McLernon MEDIOCRE
@adamweintraub62746 жыл бұрын
Outstanding! Thank you for this.
@SgtSoda2 жыл бұрын
I would really love more of these wargame reviews! I know this video is 3 years old at this point though 😅
@absentmindedprof5 жыл бұрын
A video concerning the career of Admiral Tirpitz and his effect on the development of the High Seas Fleet would be very interesting. Tyvm!
@the_vaportrail_10485 жыл бұрын
If it was real, it would’ve been epic! Like you explained it
@gunny4195 жыл бұрын
At this time this is my favorit alternate history video. full stop. (i would still like a part two from grand fleet point of view.)
@ronalddamp27453 жыл бұрын
Fascinating..and very plausible..well done sir..
@MrDCPatterson5 жыл бұрын
Another absolutely wonderful episode!
@kirkmarch47134 жыл бұрын
I always knew the Navy was more concerned about social status and fashion sense versus the grunts in the mud or the Flyboys Dancing In The Clouds
@Jack2Japan5 жыл бұрын
Q&A - Did you say what game/system you used for this war gaming? All manual or computer assisted?
@stephencipolla24745 жыл бұрын
Very cool. I enjoyed it, particularly as you informed us listeners as to the scenarios gamed and compiled in order to achieve the timeline, rather than pulling stuff out of an rear orifice. nicely descriptive, and narrated. nice work to all, Bravo Zulu.
@ushaw96 жыл бұрын
Brilliantly done, loved every minute, great to here HMS New Zealand lucky as ever. Captain of the Texas should be given a Knighthood so Texas could join the Empire!
@jerredwayne84015 жыл бұрын
Texas prefers to be it's own country but thank you! Lol
@jamesd34723 жыл бұрын
This was an exceptionally well narrated and thought out video. I've binge watched far too many today, and I have enjoyed all of them with differing reactions for differing topics, so thank you! One question is whether you could do a video on the British naval plans pre world war 2, as it's something I'd like to hear more about after watching your plan Z video. Probably the wrong video to post this on but here we are!
@neildahlgaard-sigsworth38196 жыл бұрын
Harwich is pronounced Ha-rich (the W is silent).
@bairdrew5 жыл бұрын
I think you'll find it's pronounced "'ar-witch" in a proper accent :P