Given the comments at the end of the video, I feel duty bound as a nuclear engineer to say: depleted uranium (DU) is less radioactive than most rocks. Precautions have to be taken during handling due to chemical reactivity and the potential for heavy metal poisoning, not for nuclear reasons. If DU were even vaguely harmful from a radioactive perspective, it would be categorised as nuclear waste and would not be available for industrial use (such as this). End of rant.
@abigailcooling66043 ай бұрын
I think I've heard somewhere that if you ate depleted uranium, the toxicity of the metal would kill you long before the radioactivity would.
@alveolate3 ай бұрын
i guessed in another reply, but does DU have a chance of getting "reactivated" in an air crash? or perhaps having it left in the open/wild is another form of risk?
@porygonalbreasts3 ай бұрын
@@alveolateonly if it was left in a particle accelerator. I don't remember much of my nuclear physics but I want to say you'd have to transmute it up the periodic table to make it fissile again
@richardmillhousenixon3 ай бұрын
@@porygonalbreasts You're right that it would take special equipment. Depleted Uranium is just the leftovers from uranium enrichment. It's made up of about 99.5% U-238, which, while it is technically radioactive, is not only so low in radioactivity that you are at a much greater risk for heavy metal poisoning than you are from the radiation itself, but most of the radiation it gives off is alpha radiation, which doesn't even have enough energy to get through the top layer of our skin. However, it is a fertile isotope, meaning if you have a neutron source you can transmute it into U-239 which then decays into Plutonium-239, which _is_ an isotope readily capable of nuclear fission. This requires a functional nuclear reactor with its own fuel source, though. Basically, if you have the resources to be able to turn depleted uranium into the more dangerous plutonium 239, then you have the resources to just buy U-238 from the normal industrial channels, you aren't going to be scavenging it from airplanes.
@jasonpatterson98213 ай бұрын
We use the stuff in tank rounds. It literally bursts apart and catches on fire in doing so.
@olafurw3 ай бұрын
This is definitely late in the recording session because the silliness meter is very high.
@tomzitiger3 ай бұрын
KZbin's favorite Viking Man!
@sophiamarchildon39983 ай бұрын
And I'm all here for it.
@achecase3 ай бұрын
too.too.
@daisylacroix3 ай бұрын
"You Sassy, Sassy Boy! Who Hurt you?" Gary Brannan. Gary Brannan did.
@IceMetalPunk3 ай бұрын
Hurt him? But but... he's everyone's favorite Gary Brannan!
@TizzoMcBizzo3 ай бұрын
4:44 🎵Cheese That Makes Your Head Explode🎵
@rikschaaf3 ай бұрын
O hi, TomSka enjoyer :D
@saoirsedeltufo74363 ай бұрын
Corry's reaction to the Caesium guess was outstanding
@notthatcreativewithnames3 ай бұрын
There were concerns regarding those things being missing during aviation accidents involving 747s such as when El Al 1862 crashed into a residential building in the Netherlands or when Korean Air Cargo 8509 crashed in the UK.
@freedomisntfreeffs3 ай бұрын
I remember hearing about this incident and it made me figure out the answer to Tom's question before it was done reading. If I remember correctly, several people who were present at the crash site have presented symptoms similar to Gulf War Syndrome which has caused more suspicion on why GWS happened to so many Gulf War veterans, since DU could have been used in armor piercing ammunition during the conflict that afflicted the soldiers.
@roecocoa3 ай бұрын
I scrolled past a lot of pictures of liquid cesium before I found anything that looks like cheese; but the stuff that looks like cheese *really* looks like cheese.
@stinenthings3 ай бұрын
Either I can't find the correct photos or y'all are eating some strange cheese I'm not aware of 🤔
@PianoKwanMan2 ай бұрын
Like a Parmiagno
@lightningwingdragon3 ай бұрын
Reminds me of the old "The Nth Degree" The tail wagging the dog.
@supernunb31283 ай бұрын
@lightningwingdragon973's comment was noticed, so they have won the Nth Degree.
@sophiamarchildon39983 ай бұрын
I don't understand that reference. For me, it was right to the movie Wag the Dog (1997).
@nikeipod13 ай бұрын
@@sophiamarchildon3998 The Format Laboratory - Experiment 3 (Matt and Tom)
@Aviertje3 ай бұрын
I can't say this question felt particularly Lateral to me. It was a very straightforward question with a straightforward answer.
@P_i_l_s_o3 ай бұрын
I thought it had to do with the bathrooms and the material clue was leading to biohazard. This was very straightforward indeed.
@quinine3793 ай бұрын
my thoughts even after 'dense' went to osmium because its oxide is very dangerous and it is used in small weights for very heavy things
@goatsfordays24513 ай бұрын
Tom just confirmed that Pluto IS a planet. Justice for Pluto, thank you for joining the tiny planet resistance Tom!
@i-dont-burn-under-the-sun3 ай бұрын
Yet you guys don't care for Ceres or Eris. Your resistance is a sham!
@sirBrouwer3 ай бұрын
I prefer Mungo however do take your towel with you. You need it.
@dojelnotmyrealname40183 ай бұрын
Did he?
@sorrynotsorry82243 ай бұрын
@@dojelnotmyrealname4018He said "other planets", implying that Pluto is a planet. That said, it _is_ a planet, just a dwarf planet.
@want-diversecontent38873 ай бұрын
Can't wait for Ceres to become a planet again
@Dazllingston3 ай бұрын
3:19 With this lightning Tom's pupils look vertical. Tom, are you becoming a witcher?
@MrSlicks883 ай бұрын
Tom is a reptilian
@timothymclean3 ай бұрын
4:25: What kind of cheese have Corry and Tom been eating?? I looked up some pictures of cesium and it does _not_ look cheesy. It looks metallic, or sometimes rocky if it's in an oxide.
@PianoKwanMan2 ай бұрын
I also looked at photos of 'ground up' Cs and it looks like the parmigiano you sprinkle on your risotto
@narrator693 ай бұрын
Talk about hot topic subject. Boeing being in such a mess right now. 5:21I got it, depleted uranium, Tom gave it away with saying military use.
@erictaylor54623 ай бұрын
Hydraulic is liquid, not necessarily water. The point is to have a fluid that is not compressible.
@retrogiftsuk48123 ай бұрын
This is the comment I came looking for. In fact isn't an oil used more commonly as amongst other reasons, water could freeze or boil in the tubes.
@FlesHBoX3 ай бұрын
My initial guess is Halon, though this is informed by my time working at Cessna, and the baggage compartment in the tail being where the fire suppression system is mounted. I've got no idea about it on the 747, but it seems logical that it would be similar, since the baggage area would be at higher risk of fire.
@FlesHBoX3 ай бұрын
Well, did not expect that
@57thorns3 ай бұрын
My immediate guess is asbetos, lead or depleted uranium.
@ThursdayNext673 ай бұрын
Fun fact - Here in Canada we have small cities named Uranium City, and Asbestos
@Cossieuk3 ай бұрын
Tom did a video a while back about the town of asbestos
@sleepib3 ай бұрын
I was pretty sure it was depleted uranium, because some other planes have a lump of it in the nose to move the center of mass forward and improve stability. (easier to add a weight than to move the wings back).
@yourfriendlachАй бұрын
I love the term “problematic ceilings”
@lucbloom3 ай бұрын
First guess: leaky toilets. The design sometimes caused certain fluids to build up in a remote area where it seeped to.
@tapio_m68613 ай бұрын
Hydraulics is liquid, not necessarily water specifically. In many use cases, water has poor properties for being used in hydraulics. The freezing point is low, it will gather mold etc… mineral oil is a better alternative.
@DanielDugovic3 ай бұрын
Corry's final question was brilliant.
@elisam.r.99603 ай бұрын
I am now going to try to re-imagine turbulence as the plane being happy and wagging its tail. 😛 (Also, the synchronized facepalm around 4:48.)
@VonOzbourne3 ай бұрын
I wasn't sure which "danger" this was going to be until Tom mentioned military use. Followed by an audible "What? Noooo... Why?!"
@sophiamarchildon39983 ай бұрын
Initial thoughts: because the structure was under great tension "at rest" and remove some part could release that energy suddenly and hurt someone. Something like cables that actuate the control surfaces, or the trim of such surfaces (no fly-by-wire back then).
@panda42473 ай бұрын
Asbestos might not have been such a bad guess. Planes have APU in the tail section (small(er) engine that powers the electronics and all the pumps and stuff before the start of the main engines)... and since it is inside the aircraft, some thermal insulation may be required... not sure what is used in b-747 though
@wolfelkan81833 ай бұрын
Corry is just as scared of saying the word "light" as Luke is of saying "asbestos"
@dannymac63683 ай бұрын
For some reason I was thinking Beryllium Copper, since it was used in products (Ping Eye 2 BeCu golf clubs came to mind) for a long time before people realized it could be extremely toxic, especially when ground into a powder, like when being cut as part of a demolition.
@cannot-handle-handles3 ай бұрын
What does Corry's t-shirt say about ADHD?
@rolfs21653 ай бұрын
"Sorry, I have ADHD" from what I can make out.
@FZs13 ай бұрын
Oh yes, I got it immediately!
@ElukeNL3 ай бұрын
Why use DU though, and not a slightly greater volume of a less dense material? Like Lead or bismuth (or a slightly lesser volume of an even denser material, like tungsten). I can understand why it's not gold, but why DU specifically?
@arcanics19713 ай бұрын
Cheesium, the creamiest, explodingest element.
@cybergeek112353 ай бұрын
To Corry's point, ever since I learned about Cesium in AP Chem some 22-odd years ago (*GOD* i'm freakin old), I've wanted to take a chunk of it up in a helicopter, wrapped in a thin layer of dissolves-in-water-y gel, and go fishing in, like, lake superior or something with it. Just drop it in, wait a bit, and kablooie!
@myladycasagrande8633 ай бұрын
... and then collect the stunned/dead fish from the surface.
@JimC3 ай бұрын
I guessed it as soon as Tom mentioned tungsten.
@avsgriffy3 ай бұрын
Question about the book: I live in Canada so I can get the US edition for $24.99 or the UK edition for $27.99. What are the differences between the two?
@Epinardscaramel3 ай бұрын
Were the notes “special precautions are needed because they contain a dangerous material”? Feels pretty obvious, no?
@kevinmartin77603 ай бұрын
It was used because it is 68% denser than lead. Also, it is a by-product/waste of the nuclear industry and so possibly priced accordingly.
@erictaylor54623 ай бұрын
I wish Tom would have bleeped "asbestos" every time it was used. leave everyone to wonder why you beeped "asbestoses."
@SmickEDibblyАй бұрын
I was thinking it was related to americium in smoke detectors, so I wasnt too far off with the radioactivity.
@afatcatfromsweden3 ай бұрын
The answer to this question was so absurd that I managed to instinctively guess it almost immediately.
@TheJAMF3 ай бұрын
I was wondering "Did they put mercury in as ballast and pump it between two cylinders, to adjust for CoG shift?". Also, at the El-Al crash in Amsterdam, were the people in white looking for the deleted uranium?
@IlTrojo3 ай бұрын
At some point after all that "goes boom" I genuinely expected someone to pick up French Affair's 2000 summer hit. 😞
@WyvernYT3 ай бұрын
How did Jordan not know this? That she didn't happen to know depleted uranium counterweights were used in aviation, sure - but I would have expected her to have figured it out no later than "something near plutonium, yes."
@joje863 ай бұрын
I just woke my wife up by shouting depleted uranium so I really, really hope that's the right answer.
@Quasihamster2 ай бұрын
So if you happen to say asbestos three times into a mirror, make sure to also say Fisherman's Friend into the same mirror three times
@TophTheMelonLord3 ай бұрын
"All of the ones on that end go boom"
@IceMetalPunk3 ай бұрын
I looked up what cesium looks like, and... dear Lord, what kind of cheese do you *have* in the UK? 😂
@l.n.49293 ай бұрын
Funny. My first instinct was that they had some glass windows made from uranium glass...
@nienke77132 ай бұрын
Caesium? More like Cheesium!
@smithandshortdogs3 ай бұрын
The risks of depleted uranium is a little exaggerated in this video. Unless you are investing it you are probably ok
@Pascaleiro3 ай бұрын
Uranium fever has done and got me down Uranium fever is spreadin' all around
@andreasbaus15543 ай бұрын
I'm a bit disappointed that, when they were talking about caesium and cheese, none of them came up with the obvious "cheesium" pun.
@TheFartfish3 ай бұрын
And here we have some delicious food for the algorithm ;-)
@KenLieck3 ай бұрын
Cheese, yum!
@stinenthings3 ай бұрын
Are we just all gonna ignore Corry's attempt to bring "perusing" Tiktok back? 😅
@DukeBG3 ай бұрын
depleted uranium is not that radioactive at all actually
@ecchikitty13953 ай бұрын
I was thinking Mercury, figured the 70s were too early for depleted uranium.
@thekaxmax3 ай бұрын
Depleted uranium dates to WWII
@cybergeek112353 ай бұрын
two thirds through, i thought: . . . . "URANIUM?!"
@curtismmichaels3 ай бұрын
As a child of the 70s I can confirm Corry's statement that they made everything dangerous in the 70's. Maybe we had scientific breakthroughs in the 80's that showed us the error of our ways, or maybe we were just a self destructive race acting out our post-WWII PTSD.
@lastnamefirstname86553 ай бұрын
it was slightly obvious what the reason was, but what the material was and the original intended use of those materials i didn't know about. luke did sound like he could've had a career in politics or PR or something.
@jaimel883 ай бұрын
Girl did not know what asbestos is, and it showed lol
@GordonHugenay3 ай бұрын
my guess after hearing the question: asbestos
@lucidmoses3 ай бұрын
One would assume they where not using one of the bad isotopes. Likely using 238 where the special safety requirements are pretty much... Don't eat it. Cuz you know how those disassembly mechanics just love eating parts of planes. :p
@dojelnotmyrealname40183 ай бұрын
In fairness, that is kinda implied in the term "depleted uranium". DU is what comes out of the centrifuge after you collect all the U235.
@JimC3 ай бұрын
4:33 "I've seen pictures and videos of caesium. It does look like cheese!" Coincidentally, the Italian word for cesium is "cesio", pronounced "CHEH-zee-oh".
@geoffroi-le-Hook3 ай бұрын
Cheesium
@yveslafrance28063 ай бұрын
Question: if an accident happened with one of those uranium-tail-loaded 747s, what precautions would be needed when burying the survivors? 🤔
@Ludvigvanamadeus3 ай бұрын
when recovering the bodies - you would need to protect yourself from inhaling or ingesting the dust. Once the bodies are recovered you don't need any special precautions during burial. U-238 is barely radioactive and an alpha emitter, so unless ingested or inhaled it's radiologically pretty much harmless. The problem is that it's a heavy metal (and heavy metals are toxic), it's quite reactive and flammable (when ground into dust it can even spontaneously combust).
@empath693 ай бұрын
well, you'd need to make sure they have food and water supplies and access to fresh air, seeing as they're *survivors*
@joshuacheung65183 ай бұрын
Ah. Damn. My original thought was beryllium alloys.
@TheAechBomb3 ай бұрын
copper-beryllium wrenches and tools are used in some places, I believeit's because they don't spark
@joshuacheung65183 ай бұрын
@TheAechBomb beryllium alloys are also used in some aircraft frame pieces because they're lightweight and strong... and beryllium dust is dangerous. Tools wouldn't make sense unless every single aircraft in that timeframe had a lost tool in the same spot, but even then they could just pick it up and move it
@byeguyssry3 ай бұрын
Poor Jordan
@donaldasayers3 ай бұрын
not at all rare and really not that hazardous.
@ArtyI3 ай бұрын
Sorry, what pictures of cesium are you looking at? Not a single one that I can find looks like cheese
@Rollermonkey13 ай бұрын
I'm sure that there is something radioactive in there. Glow-in-the-dark radium paint, something lead-lined, or asbestos insulation. Not very specific, but those are the big three of demolition hazards.
@wiseSYW3 ай бұрын
it's depleted, so it shouldn't be radioactive anymore
@alveolate3 ай бұрын
my guess is that in the event of a crash, high temperatures and/or pressures may reactivate it or something? either that or depleted uranium is only 99.x% depleted and that fraction left over might cause issues if lost in the field.
@nbartlett65383 ай бұрын
@@alveolate It doesn't "reactivate". Uranium is chemically very poisonous, quite separately from being radioactive. Depleted uranium, from which most of the U-235 isotype has been removed, is only weakly radioactive but it remains just as toxic.
@blindleader423 ай бұрын
A good working definition for all heavy metals is _Very Toxic to living things._
@Ludvigvanamadeus3 ай бұрын
@@alveolateit's possible to activate a nuclide and make it more radioactive, but it requires neutrons that transmute it into a different isotope/element. It cannot possibly happen accidentally to a 747.
@naturallyinterested75693 ай бұрын
3:20 Lizardperson Tom Scott?????
@allanrichardson14683 ай бұрын
Give him a break! He’s doing asbestos he can!
@schniemand3 ай бұрын
For most of this i thought it'd be mercury. Even the "only couple of planets away" right before the reveal fit lol
@ta-theoadonis4653 ай бұрын
Of course it's the one thing that you're supposed to stay away from 😂 How in the world are we still alive and kicking is beyond me
@Gzeebo3 ай бұрын
You don't have to say it 3 times. There is as****os literally everywhere.
@avirajsinghmehta18573 ай бұрын
Spoiler Gggggg Depleted Uranium used as counterweight
@RMS_Azad3 ай бұрын
The dangers not hidden if it's Boeing!
@MartianHomebody3 ай бұрын
First! Also the lack of commas in the question made it sound like the plane was built specifically to be scraped lol. EDIT: Oh no.. I didn't mean to start comma drama.
@lexistential3 ай бұрын
there's nowhere in that sentence where a comma makes sense
@blindleader423 ай бұрын
All planes are built to be scraped... except B-52s, apparently. Yeah, yeah, not _specifically._
@cannot-handle-handles3 ай бұрын
That's also how I first read it! 😀 "Why are extra precautions taken when disassembling the tail section of a Boeing 747, built in the 1970s, for scrap?" …would have been clearer, or maybe with dashes rather than commas.
@MartianHomebody3 ай бұрын
@@lexistential "...747, built in the 1970s, for scrap." Like that, bud.
@wta15183 ай бұрын
@@blindleader42 The B-52s just have too many engines to be scrapped.
@Fs3i3 ай бұрын
Spoiler 5:55 "I find that when I'm making a plane, I also want it to double as a dirty bomb"