See http:/larrylawlaw.com/youtube for a list of exam tips like these.
Пікірлер: 18
@phebe95492 жыл бұрын
THIS IS SO HELPFUL THANK YOU & GOD BLESS
@sangwonkim92987 жыл бұрын
Got a question~ if i want to cite legal sections in the RULE part~ like copy paste~ to avoid writing anything stupid ~do i put them in italics/ or should i just use citation 'marks' like Consumer Guarantees s 274 - 'liabilities of manufacturer to seller of defective good' or should use both italics/ and citations 'marks' like in harvard referencing style?
@natashaannitah53384 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video it's really helpful but honestly speaking I want to do law and I would ask help for some of questions asked in pre entry exam . Please someone to help
@200li7 жыл бұрын
Thanks Larry, really really useful : ) Hope you can do more of this type of video in the future ; )
@crystalb.81967 жыл бұрын
Thank you, all 1L students should watch this. Please do more videos like this with a more complex analysis.
@bradyjohn77993 жыл бұрын
sorry to be offtopic but does anyone know of a way to log back into an Instagram account? I was stupid forgot my password. I love any help you can offer me!
@andresjustus29603 жыл бұрын
@Brady John instablaster :)
@bradyjohn77993 жыл бұрын
@Andres Justus thanks so much for your reply. I got to the site through google and I'm in the hacking process now. Takes a while so I will get back to you later with my results.
@bradyjohn77993 жыл бұрын
@Andres Justus it did the trick and I finally got access to my account again. Im so happy! Thank you so much, you saved my account :D
@morganistdiefrage33105 жыл бұрын
Danke Herr Larry!
@ReynosoJD5 жыл бұрын
Great Video! Should the essay facts be written in past or present tense when stating the facts?
@Sebmpg3 жыл бұрын
Anyone in the CREAC team?
@nickmoesq3 жыл бұрын
Only for the legal writing classes, IRAC for every other class.
@justinejackson14097 жыл бұрын
Hey Larry! I just did a torts exam and one of the discussion questions caught me off daughter. The facts were centered around negligence per se. One of the discussion questions clearly was applicable to negligence per se. However, the second question didn't seem applicable to that doctrine, so I defaulted to common law negligence, which also didn't seem to work. Do you have a Skype or a verbal way I can discuss this fact pattern and question to you? I don't see how any of the negligence doctrines could apply to the second question, but again why would the professor specifically ask a question that really would fail under negligence?