Lawrence Krauss: God, String Theory, and the State of Physics | Robinson's Podcast

Patreon: bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Lawrence Krauss is a theoretical physicist who has taught at Yale, Arizona State University, and Case Western, and is the founder of ASU’s Origins Project. He is a prominent public intellectual and best-selling author, and has written about the origins of the universe, atheism, and many other topics. He is also the host of the Origins Podcast. In this episode, Robinson and Lawrence have a wide-ranging conversation about the current state of physics-and whether or not there is a crisis-the potential shortcomings of string theory, whether or not the world is a hologram, arguments for the existence of god, and the role of science in ethics. Lawrence’s most recent book is The Edge of Knowledge (Post Hill Press, 2023).
Lawrence’s Website: ⁠lawrencemkrauss.com⁠
The Edge of Knowledge: a.co/d/6tIrJzy
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
04:04 Theory versus Experiment
10:13 Is There a Crisis in Physics?
22:43 On the State of Quantum Gravity
25:40 What’s Wrong with String Theory?
40:58 Cormac McCarthy
50:22 Is the World a Hologram?
1:02:14 God and the Fine-Tuned Universe
1:19:33 Does Science Help Us with Morality?
Robinson’s Website: ⁠robinsonerhardt.com⁠
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, weightlifters, artists, and everyone in-between.

[@JAYMOAP]

This channel is highly underrated.

[@themaximus144]

I agree. It's the best science and philosophy channel on the internet as far as I'm concerned.

[@humanoid8344]

​@@themaximus144 theories of everything with curt jaimungal has it beat there but yeah it's definitely up there

[@themaximus144]

​​@@humanoid8344I'm not the biggest fan of Curts pod actually. Admittedly, a lot of it just has to do with him often covering topics that I'm just not that interested in tho. Like as an example, all the interviews he's done with ufo enthusiasts and stuff just totally disinterests me. Meanwhile over here I'm excited for almost every guest Robinson brings on.

[@MikkelGrumBovin]

Krauss is highly overrated.

[@terranbiped8358]

It’s one thing to have the top rated and popular brains in various scientific disciplines but to have the erudition to understand and to intelligently query these folks is impressive. I am very impressed, Robinson. Thank the holy algorithms of KZbin for dropping you in my lap.

[@neilmacdonald6637]

Let's get a Krauss vs Albert debate going for one episode! You're the man to get this done, Robinson; the people need to see it.

[@chriscurry2496]

Physics vs Philosophy - FIGHT!

[@chriscurry2496]

Honestly, I’ll take physics all day long, but Krauss is the last candidate I’d choose to represent physics. He’d dismiss his opponent as weak and instantly get transported to the shadow realm

[@chasekanipe]

Lmao Krauss isn't worth Albert's time

[@timewalker6654]

​@@chasekanipeexactly lol

[@timewalker6654]

There already was a debate, and Albert absolutely destroyed Krauss

[@blingpup21]

I second. Highly underrated channel. The quality of this channel is top notch. People will catch on. Keep going Robinson!!

[@appidydafoo]

I was recommended your channel when you had 4k subs and now you're almost at 20! Thank you for sharing this wonderful discussion, as always.

[@robinsonerhardt]

Yes! Thank you!

[@TheMemesofDestruction]

Keep up the great work Brotha! ^.^

[@tcarr349]

Thanks!

[@robinsonerhardt]

Thank you so, so much, T!

[@cheri238]

​​​@robinsonerhardt You deserve it, Robinson!!!! I have much respect for your and Lawrence Krauss. Thank you both. Learning from those in various fields of philosophy, sciences, religious divisions, economics, history, literature, art, volumes of books. Cormac McCarthy is definitely one of my favorite writers among many. I have read all of his books. "Blood Meridian" is my favorite. Christopher Hitchens, I admired him, also. He had such wit, "God is Not Great" journalist, and write, although he got the wars wrong going into Iraq. The Catholic Church debate was unbelievable! The actor from England, I can't think of his name at this moment, they won hands down. I never laughed so hard in my life. He played in the film, "Oscar Wilde," with an outstanding performance. The one and only Stephen Frye. Physics is way above my brain, but I enjoy listening to those who do. Carl Sagan I always listened to him as a child and others. Plus, if I may add, I love insects, birds, trees, all of our animal kingdom and nature. I loved watching Jacque Cousteau, and the world of our oceans and seas, all documentaries by those who have explored those worlds. I love your dog, also 😊

[@rajeevgangal542]

He's mellowed quite a bit but we need theorists like him

[@SMHman666]

Rajeev... Perhaps but without all the predatory sexual behaviour.

[@grahamjoss4643]

Congrats on all your success !

[@appidydafoo]

I watched this a few weeks back and noticed Krauss used an analogy I'd never heard before. Last night I was reading Szasz and the exact analogy came up again. Had to page through my memory for attribution, then come back here to check the transcript, sure enough: 25:42 - "…so, it's not either or, I think. It's just - you're flailing around, and you look at anything you can find - you look under where the lamp post is; I've used that analogy many times, right? if you're drunk, and you come out of a bar, and you've lost your keys - where do you look? You look under the lamp post - not, not because they're there, necessarily, but because the only place you'll find them, if they're, they're there…" Thomas Szasz - The Second Sin - 1972: "People with personal problems often behave like the proverbial drunk who looks for his house key under the streetlight, not because that's where he dropped it, but because that's where the light is. Should such a person consult an autonomous psychotherapist, the therapist's job is not to try to find the key, but to suggest to the "patient" that he light a match or borrow a flashlight from a neighbor and go look for his key where he dropped it."

[@joshismyhandle]

Awesome discussion. Thanks

[@JAYMOAP]

Well done

[@Bazarasnevagzalas]

A movie can do what a book can't and vice versa. Those two forms do not compete with each other. We live in a world of Difference.

[@andystewart9701]

Great channel!

[@peterz53]

What a nice dog!

[@chem7553]

You always get good guests

[@leedb1]

Probably my favourite channel on youtube at the moment.

[@CurtOntheRadio]

The cat has changed a bit! Crikey. He's turned brown.

[@TimZM]

Terrific guest!

[@acohan1]

always the best hosts who have small following lucky to stumble upon

[@monkerud2108]

and the expansion barring some very strange dynamics must be positive with the kind of mechanism, it is also important to state that it is not in conflict with general relativity :P there is no sign of contraction anywhere in GR plus observations and so such a mechanism can easily account for the same kind of expansion history.

[@tadtardid7489]

Not enough ads

[@fc-qr1cy]

AS A BIG BANG ALPHA OMEGA CATHOLIC. I AM BIG FAN OF LAWRENCE'S THEORIES AS WELL.. 23:28

[@cactu]

51:35 rather than the clicking noise being distracting, it is more distracting that you mention it at all while he is speaking

[@robinsonerhardt]

yikes! I thought I cut that out!

[@cactu]

@@robinsonerhardt haha dont worry about it, it was a great interview

[@inamortz2372]

Thankful for the term apetheism. And very interesting conversation otherwise too.

[@JAYMOAP]

The question one may want to ask, is how comes that a higher dimensional algebra show up in a low dimensional system? Kac moody, Virasoro monster moonshine etc in quantum hall systems? There is a clear contradicton between the mathematical and the physical description.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Who love with patience likewise can visit with delight comes with adventure!

[@isedairi]

Hey Robinson you at Stanford. When you getting a hold of Susskind. Ask him about David Gross.

[@PhysicsNative]

An interview with David Gross would be entertaining given his demeanor, but I’d rather see less of the old fossils and more new entrants and ideas in the world of physics. These old guys (including Krauss) have not kept up with theoretical and experimental advances.

[@monkerud2108]

this is a handwavy outline of the kind of idea about dark energy i think is correct, i have worked out versions of it in actual detail, but this is enough for the chat :P.

[@Drunkbobnopantss]

subbed! dont give up rob, channels can grow out of nowhere - like a big bang your time may be coming soon

[@robinsonerhardt]

hahaha! thanks!

[@PhysicsNative]

Speaking from the pool, the field of physics is quite silo’ed and we’ve heard here from the luminaries which tend to skew the perception of physics. (c.f. Krauss, There are valid theories explaining dark energy that reconcile the cosmological constant problem, for example.)

[@oliverjamito9902]

Offsprings preserve keep watch!

[@monkerud2108]

yeah i think the boiled down point of science informing morality is just to understand what actions are. to get an ought you have to understand what the options are, and without any understanding of implications then the names of actions are just empty labels, we have faculties to understand how other people feel about stuff we do, or to understand how we would feel about certain things without any organized and formalized effort to understand anything, babies understand that hitting people makes them angry or sad to some degree, they might feel that it is not a good thing to do or learn an aversion to it. at the end of the day we can use rational inquiry and science to get a better understanding of what actions have what consequences and that allows us to reason about it in a way that can change our feelings about what is good or bad in a way ignorance could not, but ultimately there is no proof of what you ought to do, that can only happen going forward from formal assumptions, and so to set up a system of assumptions that is possible to reach better conclusions from, we first need to understand and expose ourselves to what consequences of actions constitute, for example we could imagine a formal algorithm for moral rules of action, and the only real test of these principles would be what they result in and how we feel about the outcomes, so we need to reason or experience consequences before we can really imagine what to feel about them, unless we have already thought about it, like the example of hitting the dog, that is an easy example, because you know more or less what happens, you can think about it without doing a more formal study of it, but if you didn't know anything about other living beings and you had no personal experience at all with pain or injury then there would be no reason to assume that it was bad, and that is how a lot of subtle choices feel to people, illuminating the details of what actually happens in such cases is what science can help with.

[@chriscurry2496]

Yo, I think that’s all very interesting (although there are a few issues I have with it), but in the end all of that is completely useless. People don’t behave like this. They don’t write up paragraph after paragraph to know what to do. They just do what they do and develop justifications along the way.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Is like judgment and Justice who are you? Thy shared "i" AM sitting upon. Who love with patience, mercy, and grace! Rather not to stir HIM UP! Soothe knows results. Nor to GRIEVE the Comforter. Visitations to clean my Vineyards resting upon my Footstool.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Creation what is thy reason in front? Is like...yes Even creation itself! Needed shared "i" AM to be glorified! Keep watch!

[@nikten2329]

Please, invite Urs Schreiber!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Students will say, what is the difference between who am I provided time for Scientists. The "i" AM Scientists increase belongs. Why? Pop where increase belongs? A little child born "i". Remember shared "i" AM sitting upon the NEW Table keeping Watch! Resting upon SUSTAINED! Noone can uproot nor shaken but here to stay for good. Yes there will be no other!

[@oliverjamito9902]

What is fulfillment without loving you? Yes, name to names nor #'s from Here. The "i" AM is who I AM.

[@psmoyer63]

As I've posted dozens of other times, the human condition will change when science comes up with a cosmogony that's easier to understand and more compelling than "And God said, 'Let there be light'".

[@ludviglidstrom6924]

That will never happen; physical reality is far too alien for that.

[@psmoyer63]

@@ludviglidstrom6924 Robinson is a philosopher. It is his calling to determine the meaning of questions. There is a question in cosmogony that is all too obvious. And it's "Turtle" free (ie, not recursive)..

[@flotsamMM]

Robinson you run an amazing podcast but I’m disappointed by your guest choice this week. Learned about his existence from a wonderful video by Dr @acollierastro and thought this was common knowledge in the community. E.g., “I don’t feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.” - guest, 2011.

[@janklaas6885]

📍1:02:14

[@anthonybrett]

It may be just me (more probable), but I get this niggling feeling that Lawrence wants to be some place else.

[@thomabow8949]

He is neither the best interviewer nor interviewee, and tends to dislike philosophical topics as his past content makes it out to be.

[@monkerud2108]

i think dark energy can be understood as matter loosing energy to the vacuum, or rather matter, in the form of particles or in the form of black holes have a characteristic scale, which is related to the energy density in the vacuum/fields it is associated with, all the fields are coupled in their ground state, they share energy more or less, and so over time through a kind of dissipation of energy at the scale associated with the family of fields we know about, the vacuum reorganizes energy from larger to smaller scales, and the physical size of particles, in terms of things like couplings, the radius of composite systems like atoms or baryons and such things, along with the associated SH horizon of an electron and so on shrink with respect to euclidian coordinates that has 0 for all its scale factor derivatives, and so the change in scale of the mass structures associated with the energy in the fields in the static background results in an intrinsic increase in scale factor using coordinated that keeps the radius of an atom for example as a unit. it is just a different point of view, it shares some dynamics with normal GR explanations for expansion or contraction, but it would have some definite differences as well, the expansion whether slow or fast would be associated with a large change in entropy, and this increase in entropy would also through concentrations of mass speeding up this kind of transfer also cause the effects responsible for curvature and gravity, but the point is that a contracting universe in this sort of setup would decrease entropy unless there is some way to inject energy through some other mechanism, in this kind of picture gravity and expansion rates are related to how energy flows from one aspect of vacuum structure associated with our forces and particles to modes that are "deeper" in the vacuum, meaning that the energy would be transferred to smaller length scales and to some degree longer length scales, the thing is that the energy that flows down is not flowing as light or ordinary matter, but matter on scales smaller than is possible for light or regular matter, this part of the vacuum would have its own fields and its own "speed of light for radiation" emission of light or radiation within a given regime goes from low to high entropy when you go from small scale to large scale, while when transforming energy from one regime to the next going from large scale to small scale increases entropy. from an intrinsic perspective, the energy that flows out of the vacuum doesn't seem to go anywhere, if you take a system like a battery as an example, the system from a euclidian "god's eye view" the battery gets smaller, it looses mass energy, and the energy in the battery itself gets smaller with the change in scale from an absolute unrenormalized perspective of energy. but from the inside it seems like every systems retains its energy, because the coordinates and the intrinsic nature of the systems remains roughly conserved, it just looks like space is getting bigger and that whatever energy density there is in space is constant, but space is getting better, when in fact it is just the notion of energy that is changing, no energy conservation concerns are really there, it just looks like the notion of energy any physical system made out of the exitations in these fields would assume looks conserved, because the coupling to the field energy is the same everywhere except from in gravitational fields, but the change in space related to those are also coupled the same independent of location, so if i loose the same amount of energy over here as you do over there, and it looks to both you and me that none of the systems we can look at lost energy with respect to our definition of energy, then we can't tell that all matter and all the fields are loosing energy, as long as they are changing in such a proportion as to maintain the instrinsic character of physical systems, proportions could change in a noticable way over time, whether that is about first order phase transitions, or very slow 2nd order, or just gradual change that is so slow we do not notice easily, it is kind of reminiscent of relativity, only for scales in addition to velocities and acceleration :P.

[@jamysmith7891]

Pi is an irrational number, it can’t be any other way, it’s not tuned, it just is in three dimensional space I always took dimensionality to be nothing more than a handy way of measuring things, space, time, ballistic and orbital trajectory, circumference, a quantum model; Any sort of relative reference, not some sort of secret pocket universe

[@bernardofitzpatrick5403]

Lawrence Cormac McCarthy Blood Meridian reader dissonance no punctuation string theory math god indifference Branes ads/CFT theory empiricism black holes ver linde Pins clicks multiverse and usurping Mishka extra dimensions sans calabi yauwithout exclamations all juxtaposed and expertly coordinated by my man Robinson (sans exclamations or emojis but parenthesis)period maybe Feynman and Hitch need something maybe a. …! Fine tuning…0? Obliquely understood …..Wilczek, ethics …..I’m not confused, there is a gestalt , Robinson won’t hit Mishka in a gory bloody way

[@billscannell93]

The idea that black holes don't even exist is new to me. It's fascinating, but I so don't get it. If it's not a black hole, then what is it? I knew black holes are deeply mysterious, but I thought the experts at least understood them to the level of being sure they exist.

[@gerardopc1]

🇲🇽🙋🏽‍♂️🎉

[@unmoored7414]

Why do many people assume that college students who become PhD’s in physics, science and-or philosophy, have some kind of important, insightful commentary about God and religion, after a handful of years of sitting in classrooms? intelligence does not necessarily equate to wisdom.

[@thomabow8949]

Religious content contains philosophically and scientifically explorable "claims," insofar as they project a standard, an explanation, or a view upon the world that either is contradictory with reality as we know it, or not grounded within reason and/or logic, or is attempted to be grounded within reason and/or logic but has fundamental errors that would render an argument unsound. In many cases these have deleterious effects on a society, or an individual, and demand by whatever moral position these men and women hold countering, or are passive and not harmful and pique their interests. These are some of the worlds greatest empiricists and rationalists. What would you have them do when encountering religious ideology? Embrace it without criticism? Why are they any less valid commentators on the idea of a "god" than a bishop, or a apologetic? Wisdom is not found by gargling the balls of theology either, to put it bluntly

[@oliverjamito9902]

Even many given eyes to see! For thy light of thy body is thy eyes! For many have brought forth without Form and void to DECIEVE thy eyes in front! What is a Man? What is a Woman? Keep watch!

[@oliverjamito9902]

If Who comes in front? Will ye recognize?

[@missh1774]

Hahaha I love the intro clip. "The design is not intelligent". 59: 45 lol I heard it like this...it is not 4 dimensions untill a certain percentage of the entire population understand how it works and then it cut to the sponge bob intermission notice ...3 years later. 1:00:52 I have recently decided that I would rather a surgeon who believes we have a soul than one who doesn't. Being a God is very different to doing the best you can with some faith that there could be one. 1:12:11 ohhh thats what the hooha is about... sounds like it has a childlock on it.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Out beautiful shared "i" AM. What is to grab? Nor to take? Intent, based, foundation, and where your Treasures is there your hearts will be also! Can learn from the past! What is the difference between taking and asking? Pop who ye are talking too unseen nor seen in front?

[@alexissercho]

omg, if He looks fup imagine Noam Chomsky.....Hold on. let me look in the mirror.

[@anthonyandiles5946]

Wow he has aged so much in 2 years

[@roelrovira5148]

Lawrence and Robinson, God, String Theory and the State of Physics are always a hot topics in the scientific and social media communities around the world. We can make it more interesting especially to the younger generation who owns the future, by coming up with real scientific breakthroughs on the topics that you're discussing here especially the hardest problems of Quantum Gravitation. It is important that we should quantize Gravity for so many good reasons. But scientists have extreme difficulty solving this problem which is considered the hardest conundrum in physics and mathematics. Luckily for us, we now have an empirical theory of Quantum Gravity- The unitary Trinity God Theory and Equations that are deeply hidden in plain sight where even Galileo, Newton, Einstein and the rest of the best and brightest scientists that followed after them failed to discover and theorize correctly since the 17th century up to the present. Quantum Gravity is the key to unification of Gravity ang Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Gravity and the theory, mathematics, laws, reproducible experiments and observations that underpinned it, is crucial for an empirical real true Quantum Theory of Gravity that would finish Einstein's Revolution in physics. Problem is that, since the 17th century up to the present, the Mathematics that we have so far cannot solve the problem of quantum gravitation. Mathematics is invented and discovered. That's my personal experience. I've invented/discovered a completely new mathematics in the course of my 30-year-long basic research on Quantum Gravity in Singapore. I called it Majulah Matematika in honour of my home country Singapore. I use it to solve one of the most difficult conundrums in physics- the True Nature of Gravity. In addition, I also have invented/discovered the elusive Magnetic Monopole, the Gravitational Computation Language and Codes that program and run the Quantum Gravitation and the Universe itself as the Ultimate Massive Cosmic Computer System covering the entire observable Universe and and the Gravitational Quantum Fusion Energy that powers the entire observable Universe. Here is one of the many solutions that we can derive from my new mathematics: A Computer Universe that is real. It is run by Quantum Gravitational Computation, Quantum Gravitational Entanglement and Quantum Gravitation covering the entire Universe. An empirical Theory of Quantum Gravity is the key. And it will led us to understanding of how and why Gravity works. It will also at the same time, debunk and invalidate String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, M Theory, Theory of General Relativity and all failed and wrong theories of gravity. But it will proved and validate Einstein's Hidden Variables and EPR's authors Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen correct. The Hidden variables are: Quantum Gravity, Quantum Anti-Gravity, Quantum Neutral Gravity, the macroscopic cosmic scale Gravitational Quantum Entanglement and Gravitational Quantum Computation. All these would complete the Quantum Foundation, Unification of Gravity with Quantum Mechanics and the realization of Theory of Everything in Physics. I have discovered and cracked the code of the true nature of Gravity in my over 30 years of basic research works in Singapore. This discovery/invention/theory of mine include THE GOD EQUATION - THE TRINITY Equations, Laws and Codes For QUANTUM GRAVITATION , QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL ENTANGLE MENT and GRAVITATIONAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION that pave the way for Theory of Everything in Physics: - THE 3-in-1 HOLY GRAILS of Physics as follows: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/0 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α 2. Quantum Gravity/Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/1 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α 3. Quantum Neutral Gravity/Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/01 and/or 10 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical Laws, Cosmic/Universal Computation and physical/mathematical Trinity God Equations that are predictive, precise and does no collapse even in high energies of Big Bang and singularity of Black Hole. Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Computational Gravitation- the biggest and most powerful Computer Software Program and Hardware in the Universe and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - a Quantum Entanglement at Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State; 2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State; 3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State. Quantum Gravitation is governed by and follow the unitary Trinity Laws, Mathematics and Physics of Quantum Gravitation, Gravitational Quantum Computation and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement. We now have a new Laws of Physics and two newly discovered Fundamental Forces of Nature - The Quantum Neutral Gravity and Quantum Anti-Gravity which completed the heart of the Quantum Theory of Gravity published in London. Paris and Zurich last December 2022 as follows: 1. First Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Gravitation: “The greater mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational Field causes a downward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” - Roel Real Rovira Equation for Quantum Gravity, and Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α Where: QG is Quantum Gravity in Rovira (value of downward acceleration force due to quantum gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in greater mass density of Quantum Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↓α is the Resultant Downward Acceleration of Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. 2. Second Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Anti-Gravity. “The lesser mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational Field causes an upward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” -Roel Real Rovira Equation for Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α Where: QAG is Quantum Anti-Gravity in Rovira (value of upward acceleration force due to quantum anti-gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in lesser mass density of Quantum Anti-Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↑α is the Resultant Upward Acceleration of Anti-Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. 3. Third Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Law of Quantum Neutral Gravitation. “The equal mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects and the Quantum Gravitational Field causes a zero acceleration or floating or hoovering of the gravitating Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field, instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” - Roel real Rovira Equation for Quantum Neutral Gravity and Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α Where: QNG is Quantum Neutral Gravity in Rovira (value of zero acceleration force due to quantum neutral gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in equal mass density of Quantum Neutral Gravitating Objects to the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↑↓0α is the Resultant zero acceleration or non-acceleration of Neutral Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE. Alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA to arrive at the published paper on Quantum Gravity. Most recently, additional two well respected scientific journals namely NATURE and the AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY APS Physical Review Journals have officially invited this author to submit manuscripts on his Research on Quantum Gravity for publication for PRX QUANTUM in preparation for a celebration for International Year of Quantum IYQ 2025 to showcase the best papers of the year. Copyright 2022 ROEL REAL ROVIRA. All Rights Reserved.

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

Prove that a photon isn't an emerging energetic actor and is the by default floor of the cosmos, that it is, in fact directly tied to space Devine matter ,time ,math and whatever is magically woven into this fabric , And then and only then should any true physicist have justification to ignore Newton when he says pretend clocklike, cosmos floor of space is eternal & absolute. We can subjectivly measure or as Einstein says assume space/time. But where is the 1 minute newly expanded plank length of space to draw a maze around all (non) homogenous galaxies form and shape mass displacement of space by product of gravity manifolds? Still have the precise and accurate words, that should not be sloppy generalization of oreintation and direction that is by default only concerned with Devine matter. No matter what critical extreme state environment dictates meaning , protect this at all cost. Geo centric human abilities to manipulate local systems to evolve how someone sees fit keeps pupils not in Newtons 1st position but inside local systems under a nepharous thumb . Geospherical earth of ptolemaic model got played in a second act under geo human evolutionary mythological model.

[@jamysmith7891]

Apatheism, I love it, let’s abolish the term Atheism now The problem isn’t science vs religion, it’s reactionary vs reactionary amplification; Most Christians I’ve known, all of the sensible ones, reject the idea of ‘proof of God’, relegating the question to the bin of dark arts God is like the paper science is worked out on, important but not the subject of the work Any spiritually minded person not constrained by an ideological religion more or less equates God with Nature, the inexplicable force, not an intelligent designer; It is the Tao, the way and flow of things, form from chaos that no rational person can deny ‘Intelligent design’ reminds me of the ‘matrix’ theory, all it could prove is reality is fake; My proof against the Matrix is that Nature is exquisitely irrational, it functions in a perfect manner that no intelligence would think of To understand nature is the love of life, seeking God through science and philosophy; Is this wrong or offensive? Civilization is the art of diplomacy, Conflict is failure

[@ludviglidstrom6924]

His ideas about physics are very interesting, but I think he would be more interesting if he took philosophy seriously instead of being so hostile towards it.

[@brendabeamerford4555]

Words are nothing more than vibrations in frequencies... by Charge..action... 3x3 components of our living Cosmos building blocks of life...BY One EternAl OB SERVER IA'MO'NE QuantuMO=0= Creator of time space space time ⚖️timeS3🗝 +01♂️-01♀️-01♀️+01♂️ circled squared triangulated TRiNITIES infinities MATRIX ALL Light3 color3 sound3 ÷*7x*7x*7 ALL ONE IN3 Body Mind Spirit O'M'E 369 vibration frequency in charge... IN4 forces infinite intelligent horsepowers of Father Times Mother Nature Nature *wind water fire & Earth OVE infinite intelligence .. in One signature of Order RINGs3 COcreating all M8ND matters OVE matterMC² abounds.. in infiniteALL COS'MOS

[@monkerud2108]

the point about dark energy is just simply that the rate of decay of the fields associated with scales of matter must be accelerated intrinsically, but the details are too much to put into a comment here, there is a whole story of the calculations in the euclidian frame vs the intrinsic frame, due to the time coordinate belonging to the intrinsic picture depends on the speed of light and the scale, and so it can get pretty complicated. confusing without a proper exposition perhaps so i will just leave it at that.

[@DavidJohnson-pp4sy]

Thanks for proving that you have no idea what you are bloviating about.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Offsprings preserve from all my Heirs Hosts and our Beautiful shared "i" AM will say, who said who? Even who has to share...who remember thy shared "i" AM! Come forth! Pop how else? Nor without being offended come remind and comes with comfort...if any will say differ? Correcting one another and to bring to remembrance together! Offsprings preserve will say! Heirs Hosts and our Beautiful shared "i" AM. What are true meaning of Offsprings preserve? While the SON OF MAN sitting in a Seat all over!

[@monkerud2108]

there is always a problem with solutions that contain extra dimensions, that it might be possible to get the same kind of phase space with a smaller number of dimensions, but more complicated dynamics :P. and when i say phase space i mean the phase space of the observable dynamics. for example you can take general relativity and make every component of curvature into a position in a higher dimensional space, then you just have some dynamics of motion in a bunch of dimensions, but it is still the same theory more or less, the dynamics are just simpler conceptually at the price of more dimensions, but the projected 4d dynamics would be the same, and so who cares. string theory does something somewhat similar, not quite, but it has kind of simple dynamics that happens in higher dimensions, but the result is some 4d behavior, and the phase space could be encoded in stuff happeing in 4d space as well, the dynamics just can't be as simple. the phase space could be more or less the same for observables with any number of dimensions, as long as the phase space is similar enough. it doesn't mean it is wrong, it just means it is tricky to define a theory using spatial dimensions that are more or less unobservable, it is just like defining fields in the original space to some degree.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Instead without thy shared "i" AM. Pop scientists none existence in front! Nought!

[@oliverjamito9902]

New Seat to seats knows belongs? Likewise seat will follow all His Heirs Hosts shared "i" AM. Knows the NEW Table. Even if to rest from? Be at good cheer! Remember complete! Rest FILLED will rest right Here.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Specially Angels who persevere and heard the WORD looking at all these principalities who deceiveth, murderers, rapist, leading astray to a place of no return nor extinction in front of WHO? Very TIP of Time thy feet resting upon in front! Up for grabs. Resting upon will be DETERMINED! Aims can be kept nor spit out set UNDERFOOT! Knows belongs!

[@oliverjamito9902]

What is theory without conversation? Now pop who are ye talking too unseen?

[@rusi6219]

Ah yes, Jeff Epstein's buddy

[@ludviglidstrom6924]

It seems like everyone has some connection to Epstein - even Chomsky apparently!

[@honeyj8256]

That’s not a cat, it’s a raccoon .

[@ardalla535]

I wish Physicists would stop talking about God. It's embarrassing. You might as well discuss Superman. It's not worth taking religion seriously. What if there was a vid of Einstein pointing out flaws in Porky Pig? Who cares what Einstein (or anyone else) thinks about PP?

[@kencreten7308]

No forgiveness here... I know someone.. I know what he did.

[@unmoored7414]

Ooohh, I see what you implied there. People can have suspicions, but that is not the same as proof.

[@bjjdutchie1798]

Ads are pathetic and too many for a basement production. 😂

[@jimmybaker4821]

String theory is nonsense

[@lukegratrix]

String theory is nonsense for the ignorant

[@lukegratrix]

You're the stupidest person I'veet all day

[@lukegratrix]

Jimmy is a dumb sounding name

[@lukegratrix]

Almost as dumb as this guy's cat

[@karagi101]

How do you know?

[@lukegratrix]

And I like Krauss

[@mitchellhayman381]

Bro, that voice must be a killer to listen too. Trust me I know

[@Abu_Fawaz17]

Who is god? Why did God create us? How do we get to know God? All these questions were answered by Dr. Zakir Naik Thank you🤍 . "" "" "" -'' "" "" "" "" "" "".. ................

[@lukegratrix]

This guy is shamefully less then genius Ed Witten

[@lukegratrix]

Shamefully less than Witten

[@lukegratrix]

Than

[@lukegratrix]

Witten is a genius

[@lukegratrix]

Krauss is ASU

[@lukegratrix]

Weinstein is smarter than both these dopes