Negligence in Tort Law: Res Ipsa Loquitur and Negligence Per Se

Visit us at lawshelf.com to earn college credit for only $20 a credit! We now offer multi-packs, which allow you to purchase 5 exams for the price of 3, or 10 exams for the price of 5, and are thus the most efficient and affordable way to earn college credit with LawShelf courses. LawShelf courses have been evaluated and recommended for college credit by the National College Credit Recommendation Service (NCCRS), and may be transferred to over 1,500 colleges and universities. We also have established a growing list of partner colleges that guarantee LawShelf credit transfers, including Excelsior University, Thomas Edison State University, University of Maryland Global Campus, Purdue University Global, Touro University Worldwide, and many more!
Subscribe for weekly legal videos and visit us at lawshelf.com for more LawShelf resources! LawShelf is a project of National Paralegal College nationalparale....

[@katietroe1603]

I love these videos; they have helped me so much! I am in my first year of law school & frankly, I don’t know what I would have done without LawShelf!

[@LawShelf]

You are so welcome!

[@brianmueller7913]

My Negligence Per Se case in CA did not go as you described: I was riding my road bicycle in a marked bike lane along a wide open stretch of road where there were no cross streets, sidewalks, intersections, etc, and there were posted 'no stopping at any time' signs. A traffic control flatbed truck (professionals), with an arrow board above the cab, was blocking my lane and extending 20" into the 60mph+ lane to my left. My head was down, cropping the sky and I did not see the truck or arrow board until I was about 75' from the truck. Due to shock, panic, hesitation and another rider on my back wheel, and 60mph traffic to my left, I could not fully get around the truck and we both clipped it, causing permanent hand/wrist injury to both of us. My negligence is obvious, but the traffic control company did not set out cones, signs, a flagman and they were working in violation of their City Permit that required them to perform this work after 1am. They also expected me to vier into 60mph traffic to pass them...all in direct violation of the CA Manual of Unified Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Yet, they were never required to explain why they broke these requirements and why those violations did not contribute to the accident. Was my lawyer the third negligent party in that courtroom?

[@battlepapaya]

res ipsa loquitur is cool af and doesnt have to be always a negative statement

[@hiralsharma9840]

Just a wow explanation

[@LawShelf]

Thank you

[@asishkumar2540]

I appreciate the contents... But advisable to slow down a little bit🙂

[@Charlie-dp5wr]

you can just change the speed of the youtube video... try x .75

[@davidsoto4394]

Excellent video.

[@LawShelf]

Thank you very much!

[@treeinpark]

Excellent content!!

[@LawShelf]

Much appreciated!

[@TeesWorldxo]

so helpful, thank you!

[@LawShelf]

Glad it was helpful!

[@kalaimaggalkrishnakumar7753]

Great explanation. What app/ website was used to create this animation??

[@LawShelf]

Adobe Premier

[@Mdanielafandi]

Does the maxim of res ipsa loquitor applicable in the case of Donoghue v. stevenson ?

[@LawShelf]

Res ipsa could have been used to show negligence in that sort of case, yes, but I believe the significance of that case was more about defining the parameters of the responsibilities owed by product manufacturers.