Discussion on Evidence Act | Sudeep Pasbola & Ruchika Motwani

[@dhavalsatishvyas9160]

Thank you

[@deepakchoudhary2813]

Wonderful knowledge, I wish I would get a chance to meet this veteran.

[@suryanarayana6480]

thanking you sir, well understandable teaching

[@anandshinde6707]

Very valuable information about Evidence Act is given. The evidence act is important and applicable in almost majority of procedural laws. We should appreciate the efforts and hard working abilities and attitudes to enlightened the knowledge of junior as well as establish lawyers. Sir really your efforts and intellectual is praise worthy.

[@nishigandhakadam407]

Many Thanks to Shri.Sudeep Pasbola Sir for enlightening us with his vast experience on the subject of the Law of Evidence. On the issue of Proof of Documents, I would like to suggest a Book authored by Advocate Shri. Virendra H. Parikh. On the issue of marking as exhibits documents referred during cross-examination, kindly refer to a ruling of the Honorable Bombay High Court reported at GEETA MARINE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. STATE, reported at 2009 ALL MR (CRI) 672, Para 22. This ruling has also commented upon the Bipin Panchal's Case. Once again, thank You Pasbola Sirji.

[@negimanu8362]

Great talk and ending was also SPECIAL with reference to sensational cases, just relished... Cool 👍😎 sharp person...

[@ASHISHSINGH-pb1rs]

Sir, how we will differentiate between demonstrative and documentary evidences. Because you have given e.g. of demonstrative evidence as plan, map, sketch etc. Which are covered under definition of documentary evidence in Section 3.

[@krsubramanian6637]

Thanks for the excellent refresher on IE Act. Can you pls add subtitles as there are some gaps in audio sometimes. A question I would like to ask Mr Pasbola in regards to secondary evidence. I am facing a situation wherein a loan document ( loan availed in foreign country, suit initiated by Bank in that country and verdict given in favor of Bank about 20 years back) , which was used as basis for the courts judgement in favor of the Bank is missing/ not traceable in the home country or Kolkata where the Foreign Court verdict was sought to be executed under provision of CPC in India. The problem is that several years later the case is being actively heard in Kolkata and the Bank may be called upon to produce the loan document executed by the defaulting borrower .What can be done in such a situation, wherein no officer of the Bank is aware of the document and the fear is that record may have been destroyed over the course of years gone by .

[@anuragankur7260]

Excellent description of the intricacies of the act by the learned advocate

[@dineshwargaur6526]

Very nice, clear well spoken

[@manishanthal9949]

Thanks for acquaintance

[@anushkatiwari3598]

Tq vry informative

[@deepak44121]

BAD AUDIO?

[@lalitkundra2151]

Very nice and warm