From the looks of it, this entire movie can be summed up with the phrase "I bet he's compensating for something" Oh yeah, and I swear with each scene the cigar gets longer and longer.
@mattmorehouse96854 жыл бұрын
Considering how often our media conflates sex and violence I think this is the ultimate example of that. Also, apparently Dr. Strangelove is rated PG. Weird for a movie about ending the world due to sexual impotence.
@jweilage4 жыл бұрын
looking through your backlog of videos, I will never understand how these videos didn't get views when they were uploaded and how they still don't have views today. your videos have always been quality and I'm so happy I've found them
@franl1553 жыл бұрын
I only found this vid by accident and now I'm off to check out the rest
@funnyfella81984 жыл бұрын
I thought this was a James bond film for the longest time
@Mikewee7774 жыл бұрын
Casino Royale ended the same way as multiple James Bonds sabotaged the other James Bonds in a war against Austin Powers.
@1fanoforange4 жыл бұрын
I think you’re thinking of “Doctor No” and “From Russia With Love”
@beepboop94646 ай бұрын
I did to! 😅
@sergeantmarcusstackerM19034 жыл бұрын
To give a nutshell explanation to someone on this movie, its 300 IQ sex jokes
@mattmorehouse96854 жыл бұрын
Considering our current entertainment, I don't think that's all that out of place. Look at music, or HBO.
@pyrofyrestudios26153 жыл бұрын
Helluva Boss, but it's a warning about Nuclear Armageddon
@parkerlincoln493 жыл бұрын
I know this video is a little old, but I think another theme of the movie (albeit a more minor one) is conveyed with the last line. Strangelove, a Nazi scientist, describing how this group of men, all white, will get to mate with a hand picked group of woman, chosen specifically for their sexual characteristics, is effectively laying out what amounts to a eugenics plan. Not only that, but he is laying out a plan of eugenics in the midst of a nuclear holocaust. His last words are "Mein Fuhrer, I can walk." The man, who is explicitly noted as a nazi in the movie has a plan for eugenics and works and theorizes about how to best perform a genocide. He regains his ability to stand to show that Nazism, in all but name, is still alive in America, and its thinking is the foundation for the arms race and the cold war.
@cipherclone26614 жыл бұрын
Watched this movie in class to talk about irony, it was really funny
@lilcritic32604 жыл бұрын
I think this is one of my favorite endings to any movie MIEN FURHER! I CAN WALK!
@ps4vortex9033 жыл бұрын
I agree.
@West_Coast_Mainline3 жыл бұрын
Yup
@leobe2104 Жыл бұрын
Still waiting for the day someone will write this sentence correctly
@brushfuse2 жыл бұрын
I'm glad Kubrick didn't finish with the food fight in the war room. The last line spoken by Strangelove is just so iconic. It was destined to be the end of the film.
@00oa44 жыл бұрын
I feel so dumb for not recognizing the significance of the title until now...
@olstar184 жыл бұрын
Wish there was a mention of the dual meaning of the bomber crews theme. It was a musical version of 'when johny comes marching home' but it is also the theme to a song with a very different meaning called 'johny I hardly knew ye.' When I found out about the different song with the same tune those scenes gained so much more meaning.
@elevenseven-yq4vu10 ай бұрын
Same with the scribblings on the bombs, one reads "Hello there" and one "Dear Johnny": One about sprouting hope, one about hope crushed.
@papapanara17744 жыл бұрын
you're criminally underrated
@johnbeauvais31594 жыл бұрын
I recently finished reading Catch-22 and I have to say that book makes this movie substantially more hilarious. For instance in your statements about the cigar, in C22 Colonel Cathcart has a long ebony cigarette holder and he’s constantly wavering on if this gives him an aristocratic masculine look to the men or if it makes him looks like a working girl. The idea of bureaucracy and the absolute incompetence of elements in this vast web creates a feeling I can only describe as “Frustratingly funny”. What I mean is that there’s this constant hang up that leads to this belief that if you go up the chain far enough you can fix your problems only to have this not work either.
@M4ruta2 жыл бұрын
Interesting analysis. Another way of viewing the movie (aside from the overt sexual under/overtones) is that a lot of the scenes deal with mis- or non-communication. The planes carrying the bombs have shut down radio connections, people constantly talk passed each other, sometimes even through language barriers, people in the war room fight with each other rather than coming to an agreement. The scene at 2:22 is a great example of this: the military adviser is in the bathroom while his ditzy girlfriend tries to get the message between him and his superior through but does not comprehend the gravity of the situation. In an ever more complex world, clear communication is key, but at every step of the plot, there we see sender and receiver missing each other.
@elevenseven-yq4vu10 ай бұрын
It's notable how the military advisor is far more ditzy than his girlfriend. After all she is the one reasonably concerned with the situation whereas he brushes it off and can only think about ass while it is being communicated to him.
@M4ruta10 ай бұрын
@@elevenseven-yq4vu Good point.
@AndrewGivens6 ай бұрын
To be completely fair to Miss Scott, she is being absolutely first-rate professional, despite lounging in the boudoir, pre-coitus, in her skimpies: she does not attempt to interpret the meaning of the message whatsoever (that's not her job, and would lead to a case of Chinese Whispers, with potentially disastrous consequences), but instead she conveys coolly - and gets him to the phone by successfully communicating the key facts. If anything, it's women who are the only ones not being straight-up lampooned in the film. This movie is absolutely about the stupidity of men, not mankind.
@seankim27434 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I learned today for the first time the not-so-hidden meaning behind this movie - impotence and insecurity. Watched this more than three times and now I finally get it.
@rexnihilum78224 жыл бұрын
weirdly this reminds me of End of Evangelion
@kortomor80034 жыл бұрын
Lmao sort of
@rexnihilum78224 жыл бұрын
@@kortomor8003 for me it's the board of shadowy figures sorta like SEELE, what about you ?
@rexnihilum78224 жыл бұрын
@@kortomor8003 mate ?
@veleriphon4 жыл бұрын
I get the SELEE reference. Pretty spot on!
@mohitonon-alco42874 жыл бұрын
"Man wants to destroy the world to revive his wife" yeah pretty close
@lovaszaron31384 жыл бұрын
Not a comedy? It is advertised as a "light-hearted black comedy" here in Hungary. Yes, with the same ending where the entire world dies. We had similarly dark comedies for stage and movies.
@TheMrPeteChannel3 жыл бұрын
I am told that there's always at least 1 person who dies in almost every Hungarian film.
@lovaszaron31383 жыл бұрын
@@TheMrPeteChannel Almost, yes. Comedies aren't keen on that but dark comedies regularly come with a death toll.
@Neo-st3su4 жыл бұрын
Man, you deserve the influx of new subscribers you’re getting - this shit is top tier
@DruNature4 жыл бұрын
one of the most prolific inspirations in American media ever, I remember seeing Tom and Jerry cartoons riding on the bomb as a kid. KUBRICK IS A GENIUS!~
@supersteve14404 жыл бұрын
The mineshaft gap was a play on the "bomber gap".
@nigelft2 жыл бұрын
... then the missile gap, hence the idea behind the whole (and honestly, bonkers*) MX programme, which was eventually scrapped to just upgrading Minuteman IIIs warheads ... or so I gather ... [Edit: *= the reason why I call it bonkers is this: The concept, depending on which version, called for a large, Minuteman-esque missile, on a even larger TEL, which would be shuttled between about a dozen, hardened shelters, all connected by a paved road, or rail track. Instead of being launched directly out of a silo, the missile would fired from the TEL itself. The idea was, as the Soviets wouldn't know which of the 12 shelters it would be in, they'll have to hit all of them, expending a huge number of warheads, thus preventing, or so it was believed, a further retaliatory strike, after an American counterattack, after expending most, if not all their arsenal. Except, due to MAD (which was never exactly sane to begin with ...), it became quickly obvious that the Soviets would, and could 'account' for that, by simply increase their capacity, and capability, especially SLBMs (which created a mini-arms race itself between whom could build a submarine with the largest number of deployable missiles ...), only further ratcheting up both the number of missiles, and especially warheads, such as can be air dropped ... for a while their arsenal greatly exceeded the American's ... Honestly, the 1980's was a weird time to be an child-to-teenager, in Britan, caught between the two, especially between, in my experience, 1982-89, as you never knew when everything was going to go bang, especially whilst at school ... we didn't even have 'Duck and Cover', as, if you were that close to see 'the flash', you were good as dead ... Even the Russians knew that, going by a joke of that period: "Comrade, what should I do if nuclear war starts ...?" "Simple: Cover yourself with a white sheet, and make your way slowly to the nearest cemetery ..." "But why slowly ...?" "So not to panic anyone else ..."]
@definitelyhooman79394 жыл бұрын
Obligatory comment for the algorithm because more people need to see this video
@thescreentroll86324 жыл бұрын
this essay got me to watch Dr. Strangelove and I absolutely loved it. Thank you
@Rotsteinblock4 жыл бұрын
Regarding the ending of the movie, it is my understanding that the US launched a nuclear attack on Soviet mine shafts and possibly also nuclear arsenals. Reason for this is Dr. Strangelove proclaiming "I have an idea" in response to the "we cannot allow a mineshaft gap", furthermore the Doomsday device was desrcibed to be a single installation so there wouldn't be a need for nuclear detonations in different places around the world if the ending was just the Doomsday device going off.
@surfq93133 жыл бұрын
...and or some real footage of the 1950's Bikini Atoll atomic tests...
@silviareyes1365 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! 👏👏👏
@Nosirrbro4 жыл бұрын
5:50 That's not quite right, the doomsday device would be a single, stationary salted bomb of some kind that releases a massive amount of nuclear radiation, probably a cobalt bomb. Basically just a nuke on the ground surrounded by a bunch material that turns radioactive when exposed to neutrons from the nuke. Thats why it would be necessary to create a nuclear powered underground bunker, because while normal nuclear radiation is bad its not nearly as long term as the radiation from a cobalt bomb, which would keep the surface uninhabitable for several decades. Otherwise a normal fallout shelter like the US already had would be just fine.
@lemiwinks91244 жыл бұрын
Good movie and game analysis? Drew me in with the Prey analysis, but I've deff stayed for the Strangelove. subbed
@0Chill5 ай бұрын
Congratulations. I’ve watched this movie a dozen times appreciating it in a different way every single time, and never thought about half the points you made in this essay. Very impressive. Idk if I’m heartbroken or thankful that Kubrick isn’t alive today to narrate the world currently around us. But damn, I’m glad people like you are. Kudos
@coffin79044 жыл бұрын
your videos are great. hope to see you succeed.
@patrlim4 жыл бұрын
100k, looks like he did
@brandondasher2614 жыл бұрын
damn I completely missed all of the subext when I watched this movie
@AndrewGivens6 ай бұрын
Great analysis. - One beautiful little detail which eluded me until now, given the themes, is that the bomber is not only successfully penetrating the enemy defences (don't need to explain that one) to drop its payload (oh dear), but the act of using decoys to draw an enemy missile just far enough away from your own 'target centroid' to minimise damage to yourself at the last moment is called... - *'Seduction'*
@veleriphon4 жыл бұрын
This movie truly proves Kubrick's brilliance. Is there any current movie director/creator who can compare, and is still working?
@franl1553 жыл бұрын
These days what films are made is decided by suits with balance sheets; nothing like this would receive any backing, even if there were someone to write it and direct it.
@veleriphon3 жыл бұрын
@@franl155 Every movie needs a bankroll. These days though, it's either a sure thing or not happening.
@barsdogukankarakoyun87982 жыл бұрын
8:57. That pilot is literally a reverse cowboy.
@DanMcLeodNeptuneUK3 жыл бұрын
One of my favourite movies. Every time I watch it I gain some new insight about the film...
@EXMachina.2 жыл бұрын
My interpretation about the movie was about a satire about American Ignorance at his finest, like my favourite bit being the shootout scene showing the US soldiers killing each other with a Big Billboard in the middle of the shot saying "Peace is our Profession".
@TombomOfficial4 жыл бұрын
This reminds me a lot of Collative Learning's interpretation. Great video.
@isabeamon11902 жыл бұрын
Excellent essay! I thoroughly enjoyed your video. Keep up the good work.
@rapauli3 жыл бұрын
Great summary -- best I have seen for this movie. Based on the stories of its production and especially the script wrangling it was not clear that Kubrick did not start out with making this movie ... there were tremendous dynamic changes during shooting that allowed this story to emerge. You seem to nail it perfectly.
@TooMuchSascha3 жыл бұрын
Kubrick simply had no cap lmfao, he made stellar horror movies, stellar comedies, and incredibly important philosophical scifi films. What a madman
@LowSkillSurvival4 жыл бұрын
I just realised I have been watching your videos for far longer than I thought. Watched this one when it was uploaded. Huh.
@RoamingAdhocrat4 жыл бұрын
I've seen the film a bunch of times, so the part where you recap the film in detail dragged a bit, but I really loved how you explained the meaning of the title - I'd never thought of that!
@Playitsam3 жыл бұрын
Great essay! Keep it up
@detritus100012 жыл бұрын
Our bodily fluids.
@matthewmontgomery77644 жыл бұрын
Wow love the doom beat as the background noise!
@bazillio69wotblitz53 жыл бұрын
Was always waiting till my English level gets up high enough to understand this movie. Now i get, that I'm never be that good in foreign language. Cause reading comments made me know - there are plenty of things, that could be understood only for one who's in American/British culture for decades
@markcoupe5748 Жыл бұрын
This is my favourite film and dont know of any other films of this length with only 1 female in it!
@uvbe3 ай бұрын
i waited 5 years until i finally crossed this movie from my watchlist so i can watch this video
@norikofu5094 жыл бұрын
The most underrated movie.
@haidenlotze75303 жыл бұрын
Might just be me not "reading into it" / "seeing it" due to being asexual (short of the blatant shit like the f l u i d s ), but i didn't get all that bit until reading the Wikipedia afterwards, and videos like these. Makes sense, just found it odd how i didn't see that.
@haidenlotze75303 жыл бұрын
9:40 I was just annoyed at this bit of his oddness distracting from fallout shelter design stuff lol i am the big d u m b
@thesmilingman7576 Жыл бұрын
7:59 wasn't the survival kit scene earlier in the film
@zeitgeist51342 ай бұрын
Apocalypse Now is also a comedy, just nobody's noticed. Duvall's two-dimensional Kilgore strutting around saying fatuous stuff. And Brando's mumbling Jabba-the-Hut Kurtz, hilarious. And then there are the idiotic French planters, like something out of Monty Python, or maybe Bunuel's Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie. But Coppola wasn't as smart as Kubrick. He also didn't notice.
@atompunk55754 жыл бұрын
I have this movie on BluRay, such a great movie
@kaymuldoon35753 жыл бұрын
So do I. Love it.
@prettycolors24 жыл бұрын
man I love this movie.
@ethanhainey36824 жыл бұрын
Great use of Mullein in the background, definitely works with this movie
@MrUltrabanton4 жыл бұрын
You deserve more views dude
@thepsplayer60393 жыл бұрын
I think that Dr. Strange love and Fail-Safe are almost anti-war movies
@kaljic16 ай бұрын
Sexual innuendos, hidden, throughout the movie. What else could we expect from a master who previously made Lolita acceptible to the mainstream?
@nigelft2 жыл бұрын
Funny ... James Earl Jones, in perhaps his first movie, was a relatively junior rank in that bomber crew ... ... later he plays an Airforce General (Alice) in charge of the SAC Airborne Command Post, in that other nuclear war movie 'By Dawn's Early Light ... ... and, of course, Admiral, and perhaps Chair of the Joint Chiefs, in 'Red October' ...
@RobFieldFlorida23 күн бұрын
The fatigue Gen. Ripper describes isn't erectile dysfunction. It's the soporific refractory period men often feel after ejaculation, which is why he now "denies woman his essence," which he preserves by not ejaculating, which is possibly Kubrick's theory of how he lost it. I was surprised, because he explicitly connects the two.
@mrlastos8884 жыл бұрын
damm you need more views
@Mikewee7774 жыл бұрын
Deep
@brucemacmillan71283 жыл бұрын
Yep. There's always another war just around the corner. Water wars anyone?
@robzilla7308 ай бұрын
Its funny: in this movie, America has at best, 12hrs left to survive. How are they gonna get the mineshaft shelters set up and provisioned, much less hand pick the 10 beautiful women for each man in that time? Strangelove is completely delusional...
@angelogarcia218910 ай бұрын
She IS the girl in the playboy magazine.
@abcrane3 жыл бұрын
This could also be called Dr Wilhelm Reich
@Cephlin2 жыл бұрын
Doesn’t seem like a comedy at first glance? The whole thing screams comedy lol Maybe it’s a British thing to see it so obviously as a comedy?
@blackroses63154 жыл бұрын
I love this movie
@KatieLHall-fy1hw3 жыл бұрын
I didn’t think this movie was that funny. It felt too real
@iluvatar22394 жыл бұрын
damn, MUCH LESS CLEVERLY!! jkjk
@tagtag1234 жыл бұрын
very similar tone from Cat's Cradle
@t4ky0n4 жыл бұрын
I thought this was about moshi monsters
@PsychOsmosis4 жыл бұрын
Wow...
@xfirexrainx66683 жыл бұрын
I thought this was a serious drama...
@OGTwistedDobermanXCVI5 жыл бұрын
Might I suggest using a better quality mic, or possibly editing the audio so your voice'd sound clearer instead of getting drowned out by your bg music. Also, not offense, but you kinda started to ramble a bit... I'm barely a minute and 8 seconds in and i completely lost focus on the point you were trying to make. Some people have ADHD or generally shorter attention spans. If you practice improving the sentence structure of your script, emphasizing and highlighting key points of your subject matter, it'd be easier listening to it. By feeding us the information in bite sized chunks, your video would be a lot less overwhelming whereas shoving massively long paragraphs of words down our throats make it harder to follow and more likely to move on to a different video. Lastly, you should try to use your tone of voice to interest the audience and subconsciously entice them to listen. You sound very monotone, it's kinda reminescent of being back in a desk in high school during an Economics lecture... Not very invigorating or exciting if im honest... If you practice your reading your script in a recording and listen back to it, you can judge by your tone how interesting your input on the subject sounds. And typically, if your audience can feel your passion and interest in your opinion on a subject, they in most cases will be interested in what you have to say about that subject. I'm not trying to discourage you from making videos. I think you might have some potential. I'm just giving you a little friendly advice and constructive criticism. Hope it helps .
@Leadhead5 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah I had barely any experience doing any of this back when I made this one. Most of my old videos were kind of a mess. Thanks for the feedback regardless
@OGTwistedDobermanXCVI5 жыл бұрын
@@Leadhead No problem. I like the commentary. It's just kinda hard to follow lol. Glad to help. :) I know I sure wouldn't be able to make a commentary myself, that takes speaking skills. I'm better at writing than speaking lol. Great job. 👌
@ohno85894 жыл бұрын
The last famed words said by this very sexy man finally made me realize how horrible the Chinese Communist Government truly is, also foreshadowing Edit: For more information on this topic the yt channel, “serpentza” a white South African who lived in China, made a video called “is China DESTROYING Africa?” Discussing China’s Belt and Road(beat and rob) program
@wagiqwq2 күн бұрын
What does the "mineshaft gap" mean in that Context?
@cartooncharacter99204 жыл бұрын
good video, also whats the song at the beginning?
@insuficienciarenalcronica4 жыл бұрын
what music did he use on the intro?
@curly_wyn2 жыл бұрын
I honestly don’t get why people think this is a great comedy. I didn’t find it funny and didn’t laugh once.
@hooty71792 жыл бұрын
hey r u ok?
@surfq93133 жыл бұрын
The horror of this humor is the missing facts that weren't mentioned like the green felt Kubrick veneered the war room table with, even though its a black and white film it was a pure Kubrick touch of genius...also the fact that Peter Sellers was the only actor that Kubrick let work without a script in this film all of his 3 roles was pure ad lib acting, and he was even supposed to act in a 4th role as a member of the bomber crew, but was too sick to do those scenes due to a cold, and that James Earl Jones almost didn't get his speaking role, and fates humor is the about the only horrible fact about this film, the movie was scheduled to debut on Nov.22,1963 the day Kennedy was killed and that was filmed in color... Interestingly Kubrick later was hired to shoot the staged lunar landing films for NASA, ironically in the same year that 2001 came out? Mr. Kubrick still had the artistic tenacity to put his little innuendos on those films too, like in certain key frames ie. leaving in some shadows on the moon? Another funny fact is what was a mysterious and sadly uncredited camera man doing on the outside of the lunar lander waiting to film Armstrong's iconic ladder descent and not even a hint of dust specked on that camera lens?... and man those sixties moon helmets have great crisp sound for being an air tight helmet...blocks air, but not sound? At that distance, Are u sure? Try that with a 1960's or even a modern full visor motorcycle helmet for starters. So let me get this straight, in 1969 we could spend buku bucks to go to the moon, but somehow not even afford to use color cameras by Westinghouse to document that monumental leap in our human history? Now there's some humor for you.
@seansmith30584 жыл бұрын
For those who have never seen the film you have now spoiled it. For those who have you have offered no insight or perspective. Was there a point to this?