Hans Gude: A collection of 102 works (HD)

[@jokesterk5302]

This collection is very much worth looking at! A real treat thank you!

[@garrettvalentino4856]

Instablaster.

[@petemavus2948]

Pleasantly surprised by how much I like many of these works. Thank You.

[@Hill10512]

Acquired over 50 years ago, I have a beautiful Hans Gude Sea/Landscape signed and dated 1873 -apparently painted in Wales

[@sabrinanascimento5248]

Beautiful landscapes

[@sabrinanascimento1267]

Beautiful. Excellent.

[@evygil]

I love hi work so much

[@susiekopp3578]

Amazing artist

[@dhirajc.makwanabhai507]

The best art. 👌👍❤

[@TajnaTullinen]

Great artist ! Especially admire the large boulder opposite the mill ... at 0.44 min ... Great thanks !!!

[@dhirajc.makwanabhai507]

The best art. 👌👌👌👌👍❤

[@doriangrey465]

Great master!

[@mahdiarab11228]

Love it ❤️👍

[@ingagolubeva4191]

The most beatyful wood,

[@sabrinanascimento5248]

Way cool. I love it.

[@antoninaflyantovucz9478]

Дивовижно прекрасні роботи талановитого художника!!! Дякую Вам за можливість знайомитися з малюнками великих художників!!!!

[@franktison4595]

Bonjour, Tout à fait d'accord avec M. Flyantovucz, si il m'était Possible de visiter les lieux Où cette artiste à œuvre, je Ie ferait volontiers, afin de m' imprégner totalement de cette magie, dont il avait le secret. Frank (pseudo)..

[@susanngude]

BEAUTIFUL any tutorials on how Hans Gude Paints?

[@crisolveni]

Excelentes trabajos de los maestros de grandes

[@chriswright7111]

I'm stunned.. more than gifted these touch the pations of all outher thoughts ☆☆☆☆☆ CW ESSEX ENGLAND ◇◇

[@musicaclasicaviva4258]

excelentes

[@nadezdapatusova8630]

Morgen than beautyfull

[@petemavus2948]

More than beautiful ? I agree Many are ☮️

[@ninteve5624]

Light master.

[@luzeugeniaarandaregules7433]

Bella pintura

[@ericdeluca1880]

🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@cdjmk1000]

wow

[@elainejones-bronin2408]

Came upon his work accidentally. Wow. several of the paintings make me think of Winslow Homer. Any chance of influence or admiration?

[@johnmartlew5897]

Elaine Jones-Bronin ....also JMW turner..he seems to be influenced by many.....this could be a collection of several artists, but all by one.

[@expromanticart6491]

Nice work, but photography made capturing details obsolete and rather futile. There are many competent similar works in world museums, but they mostly lack exceptional works, and that means exceptionally different. The problem with the styles before Impressionism was conformity. After all, the classical training produces clones. The closer a work was to his master's, the more praise he or she got. Now there were geniuses among them. For example, Neoclassical style had David as its foremost painter. Classical style had Poussin. Baroque period had Rubens ( God of painting, period!) as its genius. The system of apprenticeship and years of training has basically died though they may still teach classical style at art schools for shorter periods. I myself was trained in many aspects of it, but early on, I realized its futility. The advent of photography, in large part, put an end to it. Most people may overlook the fact that the definition of art has changed over the past centuries. When someone says he is an artist, it has an array of meanings. In the old days, artists were craftsmen, and toiled for years in their master's studio to hone their skills. Once they reached a period of maturity, they used a certain style and techniques associated with it, and almost never swayed from it. They did not experiment with wild ideas and techniques. If they were court painters, could they have produced a Picasso-like portrait of their king? No way, they did not want to lose their heads. Nowadays, individual expression is valued and praised. The more different and the more shocking techniques sometimes get many admirers. Art is not a fixed notion. It is constantly evolving. Stagnation is not good for artistic endeavors. Neither the traditional art, nor the modern art has more merits over the other. If your work touches your viewers, and if you communicate with them emotionally, that is a great accomplishment. In the old days, the connection was logically and emotionally made, but the emphasis was on painting meticulous works. You could still paint that way, but you will remain an old relic of the past. Think about it next time you paint or do any kind of art. Be yourself my friends, and not a carbon copy.

[@cathymiller2798]

I think this to myself a lot ... generally speaking... I copied and pasted it.. here working on Oils glad to hear this .. its better than hearing it in my head .. ANd well said..

[@jeremiahmichaelpierson]

Sweet, but, these organizations need to make their entire portfolio G Rated. We Quakers would love to support a G Rated platform, having nudes and so on prevents us from using, or ardently supporting, what we may otherwise support, these web presentations. We must protect the young ones, and we need these art venues to make those adjustments. If they don't, as they obviously won't employ at this time (a G rated platform), puts us in a love hate position, obviously wishing to share these offerings, and having an appreciation for their work, these venues and their staff, to our youth, and ourselves. Will we be able to allow these venues free access to our children, and even we adults? We will sadly look with guarded eyes, and make our web restrictions in stone, and in line with these reasonable perimeters. The Organizations here have made their decision, and we must make ours. They have chosen to reap the rewards of a non-Quaker audience, and this removes us from a place of full support and forces us to be a viewer that must employ the right screening we must use../Jeremiah