Me, well the exam is one day from today, actually.
@mariellacross2415 жыл бұрын
Brad Wilson i have one today
@jaiden93915 жыл бұрын
Have one tomorrow
@pasanamaraweera45995 жыл бұрын
i have a one tomorrow :D
@jayanthikumari15525 жыл бұрын
Tomorrow law exam for me
@Creativityandtrending8 ай бұрын
Who is watching in 2024. Love for them❤
@crazygamerboy3385 жыл бұрын
omg..you explained this 100000 times better than my lecturer ...god bless you 😩😩😩❤️❤️❤️
@heavynroyalteey3 жыл бұрын
Frl!!😂❤️😭
@nashsingh51172 жыл бұрын
frfr but my teacher does use real life examples like a shoe example the offer is when you look at the shoe, the consideration is when the employee gives you the shoe and acceptance is paying the employee
@allyjoe68236 жыл бұрын
you saved my gpa ,God sent you
@LostJellybean2 жыл бұрын
Very well explained, especially you made it very visual. 100% thumbs up. you made contract law very easy to understand
@xtinaangel4 жыл бұрын
Thank you I am working on a assessment and you have helped me to better understand invitation to treat. So that the customer is actually the offeror and the assistant is the offeree thankyou
@ericisabirye19923 жыл бұрын
3 years later tired of reading just wanted to hear someone's voice talking about the subject matter
@sitikay3 жыл бұрын
Hi all your online lectures are very helpful! Please cover more on contract law ☺️
@davidriley3547 ай бұрын
Everything I learned in yesterday's 3 hour class that is mandatory attendance, I learned in this 13 minute video. Easy to feel like a pleb when this happens, and this happens a lot.
@HelenaClift5 жыл бұрын
Very clear for my students of Legal English. Impressed! Thank you.
@nidhiladiwal62995 жыл бұрын
Helen M. Denney Clift watch CA CS foundation students kzbin.info/www/bejne/sKu9mHmaqal3f5Y
@stormyzee52726 жыл бұрын
You are just amazing!! Thank you so much. I wish u had more law videos x
@ntandoqulontuli17062 жыл бұрын
This truly makes sense, thank you
@dausrusli3 жыл бұрын
Good explaination..thank you sir
@jalpari2346 жыл бұрын
hello sir, your video is really helpful. you have a very soothing voice and explained the topic really well. stay blessed
@drummerboy1066 Жыл бұрын
The Pharmaceutical Society argued that placing the item in the bask was the acceptance. This was the artificial argument they created to mitigate the fact that a pharmacist was able to supervise transactions at the cash desk - thus meeting their duty under the Pharmacy and Poisons Act.
@JohnnyDO1111ofAltea7D6 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for your online lectures! Things are more clearer now!
@LawWithAuthority14 күн бұрын
Good work
@sananderson32832 жыл бұрын
Very clear and helpful
@nashsingh51172 жыл бұрын
my teacher does use real life examples like a shoe example the offer is when you look at the shoe, the consideration is when the employee gives you the shoe and acceptance is paying the employee
@rosemarybweupe3908 ай бұрын
That was really helpful
@bradogston86205 жыл бұрын
If someone sends the bank a promissory note and the bank scans the original into there system then allegedly destroys the original does that constitute acceptance by conduct ? And would they be liable to honour the note ?
@mariaelenaalmada92734 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation!
@jaiden93915 жыл бұрын
I have my contract law exam tomorrow and this literally saved my ass
@Jenpadilla15 жыл бұрын
Sounds confusing invitation to treat isn’t an offer . It’s an invitation to attract people .
@michaelsrowland4 жыл бұрын
What happens if someone accepts someones offer verbally, but refuses to sign the written contract because they have changed their mind and do not want to accept it now
@vedjain87894 жыл бұрын
You can't do that . There is no need for contract to be written . Once your acceptance comes in knowledge of other party you can't back out
This Lecture is really educative, very precise and interesting. But the only concern is you did not talk about Implied waiver of the communication requirement in the case of a Unilateral contract. I am not sure, but I guess it’s probably because your focus is on Bilateral contracts
@funny_content20282 жыл бұрын
Amazing
@hjboss095 жыл бұрын
Excellent , Make more videos for law pls
@JS-vp6wg6 жыл бұрын
Please make the rest for consideration and intention
@Learnloads6 жыл бұрын
There is a consideration one now as well - see learnloads law playlist.
@glenncookson54425 жыл бұрын
VERY helpful! Thank you!
@RenaMichelle5 жыл бұрын
Have my law exam tomorrow this was so helpful. Wish u were my teacher tbh
@montezwilliamsbey33055 жыл бұрын
Serena Potter, I would like to discuss your legal aspirations, email me please.. montezrashaadwilliamsbey@gmail.com
@shyletmapanga97132 жыл бұрын
Not me with an exam tomorrow watching this only now
@krishnaleelashanthakumar60704 жыл бұрын
Guys do more like this .....that would be greatly helpful
I didn't really get the exception number 3 of communication of acceptance
@davidparsons65883 жыл бұрын
How should I go about the state agencies and the court system is saying that I was driving after saspencion and I never had a license and the law books show us we have the right to travel without a license and we can wave the payment and travel from point A to point B in our privete capacity and i was traveling in my privete automobile going to a funaral of my girlfriends mother and I told the Police that kidnapped me from the public Raods that are open to the public and a mater of right and not a privlige and the judge told me that I was to pay a$200 and 90 day's in jail there is no injury claim and iam not going to except that offer unless they are willing to compinsate me for a order for one million dollars every 30 days i spend in there jail for a living man and not a fictional entity or a employee of their kind
@rykarrahmitchell3 жыл бұрын
Hello, if a person makes an offer and the offeree does not accept the offer but another person or other persons do accept that offer what becomes of that? @LearnLoads
@yojnasingh35293 жыл бұрын
I suppose here, the new person is making an offer to the original offeror, therefore it is up to the latter to accept it or not
@rykarrahmitchell3 жыл бұрын
@@yojnasingh3529 In the scenarios I’m working on the other person’s are not making an offer they are accepting the original offer in different ways. Thanks for your input tho
@melissamelodies37295 жыл бұрын
Extremely helpful!
@naomiord58775 жыл бұрын
Here because of my law exam tomorrow lol
@luthandomyezo57986 жыл бұрын
@UKZN Students where re you?
@chesapeake.ripper3 жыл бұрын
thank you sir!
@matthewzadeh2103 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@Arnishaarnastacia5 жыл бұрын
Currie v. Misa (1875) can you explain that one
@tiadasilva45025 жыл бұрын
The case can just be used to define consideration. Don’t quote me on this though.
@RISHIRAJ-xc7tu3 жыл бұрын
In Indian corporate context, after all tendering / negotiation process, Purchaser sends a PO to seller for acceptance, with some additional terms. Normally, seller accepts PO with some comments & limit liability say 10 % of contract value. Afterward purchaser does not send revised PO (even doesn’t object on comments) and work started. Seller send deliverables and purchaser release payments. My question is whether PO is considered as valid. At this juncture, I want to safeguard interest of seller and not purchaser.
@MsIslandgirl7585 жыл бұрын
2019 !
@sw32195 жыл бұрын
Can you address Hartley v. Wharton
@richicork5 күн бұрын
So cooked I might as well be deep fried... Exam in like one hr
@nfarahinj.81326 жыл бұрын
Can you explain Chapter agency ?
@bannanabumman15296 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!
@jawata27332 жыл бұрын
hey is there anyone who is studying Cambridge A2 law on 9084 , i really could use some notes to solve past papers.