omg..you explained this 100000 times better than my lecturer ...god bless you 😩😩😩❤️❤️❤️
@heavynroyalteey2 жыл бұрын
Frl!!😂❤️😭
@nashsingh51172 жыл бұрын
frfr but my teacher does use real life examples like a shoe example the offer is when you look at the shoe, the consideration is when the employee gives you the shoe and acceptance is paying the employee
@Creativityandtrending6 ай бұрын
Who is watching in 2024. Love for them❤
@bradwilson54835 жыл бұрын
Who else has a law exam tomorrow looking at this?
@nicolewhite91245 жыл бұрын
Me, well the exam is one day from today, actually.
@mariellacross2415 жыл бұрын
Brad Wilson i have one today
@jaiden93915 жыл бұрын
Have one tomorrow
@pasanamaraweera45995 жыл бұрын
i have a one tomorrow :D
@jayanthikumari15525 жыл бұрын
Tomorrow law exam for me
@allyjoe68236 жыл бұрын
you saved my gpa ,God sent you
@ericisabirye19923 жыл бұрын
3 years later tired of reading just wanted to hear someone's voice talking about the subject matter
@stormyzee52726 жыл бұрын
You are just amazing!! Thank you so much. I wish u had more law videos x
@sitikay2 жыл бұрын
Hi all your online lectures are very helpful! Please cover more on contract law ☺️
@LostJellybean2 жыл бұрын
Very well explained, especially you made it very visual. 100% thumbs up. you made contract law very easy to understand
@Jenpadilla15 жыл бұрын
Sounds confusing invitation to treat isn’t an offer . It’s an invitation to attract people .
@jaiden93915 жыл бұрын
I have my contract law exam tomorrow and this literally saved my ass
@bradogston86205 жыл бұрын
If someone sends the bank a promissory note and the bank scans the original into there system then allegedly destroys the original does that constitute acceptance by conduct ? And would they be liable to honour the note ?
@JS-vp6wg6 жыл бұрын
Please make the rest for consideration and intention
@Learnloads6 жыл бұрын
There is a consideration one now as well - see learnloads law playlist.
@sheborasambakamara12797 ай бұрын
This Lecture is really educative, very precise and interesting. But the only concern is you did not talk about Implied waiver of the communication requirement in the case of a Unilateral contract. I am not sure, but I guess it’s probably because your focus is on Bilateral contracts
@michaelsrowland4 жыл бұрын
What happens if someone accepts someones offer verbally, but refuses to sign the written contract because they have changed their mind and do not want to accept it now
@vedjain87894 жыл бұрын
You can't do that . There is no need for contract to be written . Once your acceptance comes in knowledge of other party you can't back out
@jalpari2345 жыл бұрын
hello sir, your video is really helpful. you have a very soothing voice and explained the topic really well. stay blessed
@RenaMichelle5 жыл бұрын
Have my law exam tomorrow this was so helpful. Wish u were my teacher tbh
@montezwilliamsbey33055 жыл бұрын
Serena Potter, I would like to discuss your legal aspirations, email me please.. montezrashaadwilliamsbey@gmail.com
@drummerboy1066 Жыл бұрын
The Pharmaceutical Society argued that placing the item in the bask was the acceptance. This was the artificial argument they created to mitigate the fact that a pharmacist was able to supervise transactions at the cash desk - thus meeting their duty under the Pharmacy and Poisons Act.
@xtinaangel4 жыл бұрын
Thank you I am working on a assessment and you have helped me to better understand invitation to treat. So that the customer is actually the offeror and the assistant is the offeree thankyou
@MsIslandgirl7585 жыл бұрын
2019 !
@rosemarybweupe3906 ай бұрын
That was really helpful
@ntandoqulontuli17062 жыл бұрын
This truly makes sense, thank you
@RISHIRAJ-xc7tu3 жыл бұрын
In Indian corporate context, after all tendering / negotiation process, Purchaser sends a PO to seller for acceptance, with some additional terms. Normally, seller accepts PO with some comments & limit liability say 10 % of contract value. Afterward purchaser does not send revised PO (even doesn’t object on comments) and work started. Seller send deliverables and purchaser release payments. My question is whether PO is considered as valid. At this juncture, I want to safeguard interest of seller and not purchaser.
@davidriley3544 ай бұрын
Everything I learned in yesterday's 3 hour class that is mandatory attendance, I learned in this 13 minute video. Easy to feel like a pleb when this happens, and this happens a lot.
@naomiord58774 жыл бұрын
Here because of my law exam tomorrow lol
@davidparsons65883 жыл бұрын
How should I go about the state agencies and the court system is saying that I was driving after saspencion and I never had a license and the law books show us we have the right to travel without a license and we can wave the payment and travel from point A to point B in our privete capacity and i was traveling in my privete automobile going to a funaral of my girlfriends mother and I told the Police that kidnapped me from the public Raods that are open to the public and a mater of right and not a privlige and the judge told me that I was to pay a$200 and 90 day's in jail there is no injury claim and iam not going to except that offer unless they are willing to compinsate me for a order for one million dollars every 30 days i spend in there jail for a living man and not a fictional entity or a employee of their kind
@thelastone39435 жыл бұрын
Law exam tomorrow like
@sananderson32832 жыл бұрын
Very clear and helpful
@Arnishaarnastacia5 жыл бұрын
Currie v. Misa (1875) can you explain that one
@tiadasilva45025 жыл бұрын
The case can just be used to define consideration. Don’t quote me on this though.
@HelenaClift4 жыл бұрын
Very clear for my students of Legal English. Impressed! Thank you.
@nidhiladiwal62994 жыл бұрын
Helen M. Denney Clift watch CA CS foundation students kzbin.info/www/bejne/sKu9mHmaqal3f5Y
@jbtwe63915 жыл бұрын
Please make more law videos
@shyletmapanga97132 жыл бұрын
Not me with an exam tomorrow watching this only now
@glenncookson54424 жыл бұрын
VERY helpful! Thank you!
@dausrusli3 жыл бұрын
Good explaination..thank you sir
@hjboss095 жыл бұрын
Excellent , Make more videos for law pls
@emprezzlove1382 Жыл бұрын
Extremely helpful!
@ibukunoluwaoguntade2 жыл бұрын
I didn't really get the exception number 3 of communication of acceptance
@JohnnyDO1111ofAltea7D6 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for your online lectures! Things are more clearer now!
Hello, if a person makes an offer and the offeree does not accept the offer but another person or other persons do accept that offer what becomes of that? @LearnLoads
@yojnasingh35293 жыл бұрын
I suppose here, the new person is making an offer to the original offeror, therefore it is up to the latter to accept it or not
@rykarrahmitchell3 жыл бұрын
@@yojnasingh3529 In the scenarios I’m working on the other person’s are not making an offer they are accepting the original offer in different ways. Thanks for your input tho
@matthewzadeh2103 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@user-pc4uy9ni5p4 жыл бұрын
2020
@bannanabumman15296 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!
@melissamelodies37294 жыл бұрын
Extremely helpful!
@hanmanpothuraju9314 жыл бұрын
It
@nfarahinj.81326 жыл бұрын
Can you explain Chapter agency ?
@jawata27332 жыл бұрын
hey is there anyone who is studying Cambridge A2 law on 9084 , i really could use some notes to solve past papers.
@Therongunner5 жыл бұрын
My exam is at 10h00 is tomorrow.
@nashsingh51172 жыл бұрын
my teacher does use real life examples like a shoe example the offer is when you look at the shoe, the consideration is when the employee gives you the shoe and acceptance is paying the employee