Lecture -1 Structural Analysis

[@akhil999in]

A strong clear voice is vital for an online video, which he has. Also a very logical explanation, so easy and interesting to follow without any diversion of attention. Other videos of NPTEL do not have the same good quality of voice, which someone should try to solve.

[@arunagiri2751]

21:00 Degree of static indeterminacy starts

[@Kazco]

I'm a Civil Engineering student at Portland State University and in my opinion this professor makes simple concepts seem more complicated. I can explain this in a much simpler fashion. "RINGS?" = COMPLICATED... For the cantilever beam with two roller supports: Look at how many equations of equilibrium you have, Te= 3. Then look at how many unknowns you have Tu= 3 (fixed) + 1 (roller)+1 (roller); Tu= 5. ... Tu - Te = 2 (2nd Degree of Indeterminacy) SIMPLE. No need to draw "RINGS".

[@sirajudheench8819]

you are correct. his methodology no need to follow. But concept was clear

[@lalithayasaswivandanapu2806]

Could you plz explain me how to find SI for frame at 40:51... please

[@drqdrn1335]

12:12 The applied forces should be pointing downwards/leftwards to generate upward/rightward reactions, respectively.

[@arialcad]

+DRQ DRN It doesn't matter. He is talking in general sense here.

[@baz860]

structural engineering demands hardwork and patience ..

[@imegatrone]

Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Lecture Series on Structural Analysis II

[@mukulaglawe8673]

Very much Informative and clean concepts.

[@chauhan716]

i m waiting for your second lecture sir it's very helpfull for me i love that

[@lhexmondejar]

thanks a lot sir, because of this presentation i wanted to finish my civil engineering course if time come and i have enough financial to support my studies.

[@senthilnathanpitchiah5132]

sir you are one of the best professor in world your style of explaining outstanding thank you sir i will go other lecture 2

[@rubelrana7078]

thanks for excellent lecture on structural analysis

[@Kazco]

I'm not sure what you mean by "bays", but if it's a 10 storie 4 fixed support structure, there would be 9 Indeterminate reactions for each storie. Hence (9x9 [not counting the first floor) => SDOI = 81.

[@2109958]

Simple and clear explanation,,,,Thata it....... Very usful

[@m.a.d.k.8829]

simply amazing

[@rajneeshgupta4607]

execellent elobration of static determinate and indeterminate structures

[@wialro]

Excellent teaching method.

[@MalikBilaldil]

Very usefull for students.

[@nitishk8128]

Sir, Why we are not considering 3 equilibrium equations for a truss structure?

[@singhdurgesh660]

coz bending moment do not occur in trust....hence only Fx and Fy exists...no Mz ....

[@madhurgoyal8840]

worth watching lecture 👍

[@missterjules]

If only my lecturer was this good.

[@abdikaniabshir4979]

where can I get the notes of these lectures

[@drqdrn1335]

12:12 he has drawn the APPLIED FORCEs in their wrong (OPPOSITE) directions with respect to the REACTIONS taken for the truss, did anyone notice??

[@fvita44]

yes but its not wrong..yo can draw in any direction initially ... at the end of example you get correct answer ....

[@sirajudheench8819]

direction has not much important at that point of time. he was trying to show only components of reactions

[@syedmohmmadmaroof]

till 33:00

[@vivekanandkumar2760]

simply amazing sir

[@Catloverss95]

FEM video 01 - Introduction and bar element kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3m1oK1oo86iibc FEM video 02 - Bar element example kzbin.info/www/bejne/bKWueXtur9WneLs FEM video 03 - beam element kzbin.info/www/bejne/sJrSeHWDqdZlhqM FEM video 04 - beam element example 01 kzbin.info/www/bejne/sJrSeHWDqdZlhqM FEM video 05 - beam element example 02 with UDL kzbin.info/www/bejne/kIS2hIuImZV5mbM FEM video 06 - truss element introduction kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z5OQaYhricyCbLc FEM video 07 - Truss example FEM kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaXHiKJvasihbNk

[@shyamsharma6767]

good review on structure.

[@rahul7672]

amazing.good work by professer really helpful.looking for easy download

[@9848263182]

i have small doubt,,,,u told that in multi span beam problem, when it changed cantilevaer its DSID is 2......but according my knowledge its DSID is ZERO,EQUTIONS 3 AND RESTRAINTS 3 then 3-3=0.....please clear my doubt

[@juliearnold555]

Are there further lectures on structural analysis posted online?

[@ShreyaSant]

Think about it! :)

[@indarpal8050]

hlw

[@muzaffarmaqbool2743]

Of course

[@urban9756]

thankXXXXXXXX SIR U R JUSTZZ AWESOME !!!!!!!!!!!!

[@carlodigma5128]

It helps a lot for me because it refresh me since it is 25yrs back, I need to learn again.. but how can I download your video is not coming..

[@a.msayem1663]

sir either go to nptel main site or use keepvid.com to download the video

[@abdulzahiraliyi8675]

where are structural analysis 1 lectures

[@dhvanitmehta7028]

It's 1st only.

[@Totalwuxiaworld]

I also wanted the same question now I got the answer

[@eimalomari1657]

it's really good thanks a lot sir

[@samiradw900]

sir, Is there a different in Force method and three moments theorem? I don't have have any idea about three moment.

[@goodmediaproductions]

@breakmillion thanks ill seriously think about what u said :)

[@MohammedAhmed94.62]

Very well explained 👌

[@navylaks2]

is statics the same as equilibrium? cause i would like to buy a better book than the notes that my teacher uses in our course for staticly determant constructions. We're working with external forces only, should i get R.C. Hibbelers book engineering mechanics: statics?

[@HemanthManohar]

51:44 Did he just say that a cantilever beam is statically indeterminate?

[@SniperGhost]

he meant determinate

[@dawitlove6859]

Thanks

[@JagadishMehabuilder]

Sir can u explain the static indeterminacy of a planar frame with beams's connection with the columns is pinned instead of fixed? If I am correct the static indeterminacy of that structure should be negative.

[@marriboinarajendra1343]

you are amazing lecture sir wonderful

[@cabdullahishiikhow9184]

thank you for it. God bless you

[@naraharimanne5240]

Excellent sir

[@satishdaregave489]

amazing lecture sir thanks a lot sir

[@360degreeplus3]

it's really good

[@mayankmishra6149]

why do i get a feel that he talks and looks a bit like sylvester stallone

[@sumanthchowdary2518]

Mayank Mishra because u are an a**

[@phantomhunter7985]

Hahaha nope.

[@bubai1984]

VERY HELP FULL

[@rowheedkhan]

Is there any chance of finding the Structural Analysis I lectures as this is Structural Analysis II

[@unnatkumar7345]

Marvelous

[@JamesBlaec]

@insightllc I have a question, why are you posting on this video in particular? i only ask out of interest because i too have this 'messiah complex' and also im taking up civil engineering, and you too probably know the strange way g-d makes one cross curious paths

[@jameskennedy4252]

Thanks for the video, it helped me a lot. :D

[@TheSohanandrei]

Actually, I find the way he explains it to be better for an engineer way of thinking. If I give you a multi-storey, multi-bay structure, lets say...10 stories and 3 bays, and it has 4 fixed supports at the bottom. Can you tell me how many degrees of indeterminacy the structure has with your method? :) Isn't it easier with the loop method?

[@M.G.R...]

Where is Structural Analysis 1 ?

[@vaibhavyadavv9641]

n

[@carlioso3000]

very helpfull professor

[@Ilyassalman74]

can i download all your lectures via torrent?

[@mohd.farhanpatel16]

thank you sir... it was very helpful

[@kutikantichandramouli2353]

Awesome sir, its more clear. But I want to know how this applied to analysis (while modelling the building structure) practically.

[@inamjangiciv]

sir here is structure II lecture. is there is structure I lecuture. i have,t found here

[@rakeshkumarbehera7753]

simple for all

[@mamtagoyal6854]

sir y u only made two cuts ...many cuts r possible plzzz make it more clear

[@sirajudheench8819]

You can make any no of cuts..but at a time u have to look into free body diagram of one part only....so SI is equal to 6 -3 = 3. If u know the internal forces at a section then u can get internal forces at any other cuts..thats why we are not considering internal forces at other cuts as unknowns.

[@baseerhussain]

1 cut means 3 reactions. And a fixed support also has 3 reactions. thus fixed support is equivalent to a cut. That a frame which has 2 fixed supports is equivalent to a ring having 2 cuts. Thus it static indeterminacy is equal to 6(no of unknown rxns) - 3( equations of equilibrium) 6 - 3= 3

[@prabhatsingh3972]

VERY NICE LECTURE SIR..... WHERE IS 2nd LECTURE

[@jiteshsharma8832]

very good lecture sir

[@Abhishek-ky8ke]

Thank you Sir

[@oscarcavezon]

I am looking for problems on how to analyze trusses using striffness matrix method for support settlement, temp. elongation and support settlement. Any videos of that.

[@ghanshyammiyani8666]

very good explain thanxxxxxx

[@BrianSibanda8]

Good lecture.

[@rishabhgupta8721]

sir you have took 2 equation of equlibrium(Fx=0,Fy=0) in case of truss joint whereas in case of plannar frame ( ring ) you took 3 no of equilibrium eqn(Fx=0, Fy=0& M=0). plz give me explanation..

[@Ahmed-nk7vu]

in the beginning of minute 39 he start to talk that the equation which we use for truss is not valid to frame

[@manavsharma5906]

ring comes in space frame according to me bro..

[@JamesBlaec]

@insightllc you should see someone, and i mean this with sympathy because i am going through similar. no matter how convincing our complex is, we cannot use it to 'hide' from our true selves.

[@MsRoughman]

In the explanation of DoSID of a ring why have u made only 2 cuts? One cut releases 3 unknowns, so as u increase the no of cuts DoSID will go on increasing. This is confusing. Please explain.

[@goodmediaproductions]

hey guys i love imagination and i was wondering would structural engineering be a good career choice or graphic design?

[@fikrukinfu2408]

That is it !!!!!!

[@AkashPatil-yo1zm]

please upload videos of structural analysis 2

[@tejansaien4147]

aren't trusses also plane frame structures? they also reside in the same plane. isn't it?

[@juliyetvarun9628]

kudos sir.......

[@hemantdhaked1903]

thankx.

[@baz860]

it is roller folks

[@vamsivagadhi2353]

good lecture

[@abdirizakhussien1197]

woow really i was confused it is it structure analysis one or two?

[@IrtizaShafi]

Why 2 make rings can't we calculate indeterminacy directly

[@anshul5656]

What are member forces, please explain?

[@ranjitsen8958]

wht is degree of indeterminacy of cantilever???

[@keshavagarwal9884]

can u pls uplods some structure ananlysis -III lectures

[@SHUBHAMKUMAR-mk3gj]

please do all these lectures for offline to download

[@043mehdi]

you can do it by idm

[@todaytrending2381]

Sir lecture no. 12 is missing.

[@nabeelimtiyaz6822]

Please can anyone tell the difference between a PLANE TRUSS and a PLANE FRAME structure?

[@nemalavenkatesh]

I didn't find the structural analysis -1, everywhere SA-2 is available

[@shahnaimat9519]

Venkatesh Nemala dr structure

[@mohdsajid514]

is it structural analysis 1 or 2

[@MacPr0xnxx0]

amazing song by Moby do u need to be a math wiz to major in civil engineering ?

[@fredcarlhogar970]

Have a nice Lecture :)

[@lekshmisomarajan6760]

Can u have the tutorial of sa-3

[@UttamKumar-dy1ko]

why you make only 2 cuts in ring

[@sriharsha8400]

Uttam Kumar it's actually just one cut. When you cut at one section, you'll have two open ends right? So each open end will have three unknowns, so totally six unknowns but only three equations. So it has a degree of static indeterminacy 3. He explained it little confusing by saying two cuts in the ring.

[@harshpatel5216]

I'm watching after 12 years of uploading 😇🧝

[@kaushalrathod4865]

Sir sa2 par video banaye plz

[@vikramjadhav9109]

is it structural analysis 1 or 2?

[@AkashPatil-yo1zm]

its structural analysis 1

[@bachi411]

Akash Patil no itz 2

[@sriyanreddy6183]

@@bachi411 actually it depends

[@meanedp6013]

why didn't you made 3 cuts in the ring??

[@sirajudheench8819]

You can make any no of cuts..but at a time u have to look into free body diagram of one part only....so SI is equal to 6 -3 = 3. If u know the internal forces at a section then u can get internal forces at any other cuts..thats why we are not considering internal forces at other cuts as unknowns.

[@AkashPatil-yo1zm]

this is structural analysis 1 in the name of structural analysis 2

[@vishalthakur1680]

Young civil engineer student are necessary study that's chanal

[@Manmathkumarbehera]

sir upload lec-12 in this series

[@baz860]

very good presentation of concepts but pronounciation is bit faulty of some terms.

[@saeed707]

thank alot it refresh my memory awesome :)