Lecture 13 Shannon's expansion theorem (Updated video:

[@Noone-dv1ej]

From 2021, your basically the only person who has what i'm actually looking for. Love you man

[@minakshiunnithan2958]

I dont really comment on videos that often, but Thank You so much Sir! This is just perfection. Your students were really lucky to have you!

[@srijishnu.spagadala8717]

yooo im here too

[@OProfessorLeandro]

I'm studing PLD like FPGA and CPLD,and now I understand why they use so many multiplex in the logic matrix. That's the best way to simplify. Thanks professor!!!

[@shreyasg5381]

From 2023.... nicely explained till the end....mucch appreciated sir🙇🏻

[@66lucc]

You're much appreciated, very clear still in 2019!

[@kacyraye]

Ridiculously clear.

[@christiandelarosa9752]

Thank you, this was helpful for my digital systems lab

[@swathiyadav5273]

Excellent Narration...

[@genelin1790]

2020 still watches it. helps me a lot

[@kirkturrentine2152]

You did what my prestigious professor could not...explain this in laymens

[@TheChosenOne66501]

Anyone else seeing this at 2 frames per second?

[@OriginalSigmar]

speed up the video and you can get 4 frames per second

[@sethagastya]

its actually closer to 1 fps... XD

[@cw3le]

I'm still new to field of logic design and I don't understand why would you want to implement that last function using 2-1 mux's. One 2-1 mux consists of 4 logic elements. 3 of them means total of 12 logic elements for implementing that switching function, where you'd only need 5 of logic elements to implement the function in regular way without mux's. But +1 for this video's brief and easy explaination of how to use Shannon's expansion.

[@MrAzulay]

It's just for practice. You can also imagine a situation where you have access to MUX's but no OR gates, then it can be useful to know this.

[@ThoughtinFlight]

Hahahaha, no ways. I'm sitting in FIRGA right now and I just found this. Stellenbosch!

[@sayuniperera9946]

Thankyou very much!! It was crystal clear😊

[@omart9411]

now, I understand Shannons expansion but still my question is WHY WE EVEN BOTHER DOING THIS? Using such a complex network of multiplexers (that are made by atleast 4 seprate logic gates) would be requier alot me gates which is horriply slow and expensive rather than using simple AND , OR and NOT gates to represent the function ?? Am I missing somthing here?

[@tebogoraphadu]

Still helping in 2020... Dankie...

[@IsaacDanielReyna]

Thank you so much for uploading this video. Your explanation was very clear!

[@CairosNaobum]

Very good explanation. Thanks a lot !

[@martinbotarev7601]

What if I had a problem with 4 variables like A'BCD' + AB'C'D' + ABD'C + A'BCD'?

[@daken4738]

amazing explanation.thank you very much

[@efan1980]

Good explanation on Shannon expansion. Well done!

[@rbdtrades9790]

great video sir

[@vinayakjoshi202]

Thank You soo much!!

[@emmanouilgkoulias3542]

you just saved me mate

[@johnshahla5042]

I have to thank you for this amazing lesson , but I have a question wouldn't it be cheaper to use w1 and w3 in 1 to 4 multi Because I've solved like that and it turned to be lots better!

[@ganeshram580]

Thank you so so much! Really good explanation!

[@mayurbalwani7277]

Great video! Huge thanks!

[@samuelthamae8588]

thanks for the video Sam from TUT

[@Edelweiss1814]

Wow!!! Absurdly clear! I love it!

[@MrJujjuri]

Really.. Very helpful video sir. Nicely presented.

[@yoknow3THESENSATION]

great teacher

[@nibzlegend99]

how can I apply shannon's theorem to a complemented function like f = ( y'z' + wz' + (wy'z)' )'

[@akhilrout9497]

Thank you.

[@aysevan2012]

Thank You so much.You helped ALOT !!!

[@ynsam]

G8 explanation... Thanks buddy

[@davidcuevas1392]

Wow. Thank you.

[@matthewmullin2626]

Awe!!! My lecturer :D

[@punisaracic9210]

Thank you sir.

[@tulasim3766]

f=x’y’z’+x’y’z+x’yz+xy’z’+xy’z choose x as the expansion variable how to solve it using shannon expansion

[@md.mostafizurrahman7209]

Thank You!

[@doctodolniak2929]

great

[@vikash201222]

what if you had w2w3 for a 2-1 mux and you were to take out w1 would you just leave w2w3 alone?

[@StellenboschEEEng]

Indeed! It is unaffected by w1

[@davidfransch1406]

Great vid. Thanks :)

[@dhimanroy1671]

Great

[@pizzadeliverygurl]

thanks! :D great vid

[@whitewolf9671]

You film this with a toaster?

[@lalit6001]

Searching for a video, How to give multiple likes from the same account.🙂

[@richardjeremias]

(7:22) w1w2(0.w3' + 1 + 1.w3) = w1w2(1) ??????? why not w1w2 + w1w2w3?

[@richardjeremias]

i will just assume the boole simple algebra... (a+1 = 1).

[@richardjeremias]

www.google.com/search?q=boole+algebra&client=firefox-b-d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAk9SpqbXmAhU5H7kGHRYrDZoQ_AUoAXoECBIQAw&biw=1525&bih=774#imgrc=xDuT2m8xtf6MLM:

[@moritzr466]

holy shit 2 fps