This was the only video that could explain things in a way that worked for me! Thank you for uploading this, extremely helpful.
@sarahammoura443210 жыл бұрын
Can you explain please why in the second example, the molecule on the left does not have resonance structures ? Thank you
@la86169 жыл бұрын
Draw in the hydrogen atoms and it'll make more sense.
@SmrutiDashiamironman9 жыл бұрын
+Sarah Ammoura if simply you want to check resonance then just check if it has double bond single bond followed by lone pair carring atom or double bond again or positive charge thats the simplest way :)
@saurabhnagarkoti95887 жыл бұрын
because when it will give e- it does not affect the ring..i.e. doesn't goes inside it.
@shivani327910 жыл бұрын
sooo good sir ..really concept clearing video.thank you
@100abhiz6 жыл бұрын
Man, you cleared up my basics, thanks a lot.
@medzomooh824610 жыл бұрын
i would like to add some thing for explaing , and i hope it will be acceptable .. there is a diffrence between the left strcture "A"and the right structure "B", witch is : the left structure "A" there are 3 Cl atoms, and each atom of Cl contains 17 electrons .. so the 3 atomes together will be 51 electrons that means the carbon atom will be attracted with a great strength, and that causes a very weakness in the bond between the carbon atom and the hydrogen atom, .. so let me say that the difference between "A" and "B" is : 51 electrons by 3 Cl atoms agains 1 atom of hydrogenfor "A",and 17 electrons of 1 atom of Cl against 3 electrons of the 3 hydrgen atoms "H" .. i just tryed to make the idea so clear with a simple explanation and with simple words .. thank you
@ritisinha40016 жыл бұрын
Gr8 explanation bro. Keep it up !!
@wanzhuzhao94398 жыл бұрын
Great video, i just wish you would talk a little faster so it takes less time. But thanks for doing this, your explanation makes it so much easier than to read the whole chapter on four simple points, i swear the textbook is trying to make it harder to understand.
@alialfailakawi74796 жыл бұрын
name of the song at the start?
@tashtash12318 жыл бұрын
how do we compare reactivity with iodomethane??? i am so lost! are phenols more reactive or would a deprotanted O be more reactive??
@Amy-se5ld7 жыл бұрын
tashtash1231 phenols are not reactive, benzenes are stable as fuck
@IUPUIORGANICCHEM11 жыл бұрын
If OCH3 is a substituent off of a larger molecule it is often called a methoxy group. If your substituent was COCH3, that would be considered an acetyl group.
@nrknimmagadda16649 жыл бұрын
thank-you very much. you helped me for the better understanding.
@HS-jg8ti7 жыл бұрын
Why would it be better to have a negative charge on the Nitrogen and not the Carbon?
@HS-jg8ti7 жыл бұрын
Is it because Nitrogen is more electronegative?
@nkchamplin7 жыл бұрын
Yes
@TraceyWinn10 жыл бұрын
Everything was explained so clearly! Thank you so much!
@maximilianosilva84388 жыл бұрын
REALLY good explanation!
@taybiibrahim766110 жыл бұрын
please sir will you make a video about comparing basicity of organic molecules by the way tjank you so much very helpful !
@anurimadatta1017 жыл бұрын
Explanation is awesome
@chizoioioi9 жыл бұрын
Very nice! Thank you
@chizoioioi9 жыл бұрын
Plenty of examples is always key
@noork8511 жыл бұрын
ur video was very helpful thanks! i just wish you had better software so things would move along a little faster.
@publicplatform47585 жыл бұрын
Wow. Thank u soooo much bro. Thank u thank u thaaaank u
@LunaDanu19 жыл бұрын
thank you, this video saved me
@mirelaratu31136 жыл бұрын
thank you for your video, it hept me a lot!
@keyvan11f11 жыл бұрын
God Bless you and America
@alil84199 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir !!!
@beverleykatherine12 жыл бұрын
this was amazing, thank you so so so much.
@VamsiKrishna-ts3up10 жыл бұрын
thank you very much :)
@asdtyu45688 жыл бұрын
thank you so much, this saved me.
@theblackout2711 жыл бұрын
This helps, thanks.
@dr.aneesabbas66194 жыл бұрын
nice sir
@prem1998rocks8 жыл бұрын
thanx a lot bro!! u saved me!
@greenglaze112 жыл бұрын
thank you thank thank you!!!
@jessicajane24002 жыл бұрын
Thank you for speaking slowly!!
@mysticmoment-976 жыл бұрын
Full timepass
@sangminz12 жыл бұрын
thank you!!!
@taruntarun97554 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir 😇😇😇😇👌👌
@Utpal-fj4hk6 жыл бұрын
These are the rules for stability
@smartlogics208 жыл бұрын
well said
@dineshranawat4499 жыл бұрын
👍✌👌✊
@Linda-ds5wm9 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for this great video!!! : )
@PabloGomez-zh7gi4 жыл бұрын
Buenas tardes desde Acapulco Gro. Universidad Hipócrates presente
@Amy-se5ld7 жыл бұрын
You could have done this video in 5 minutes tops
@sodaxcandy0811 жыл бұрын
saved my ass. I love you
@la86169 жыл бұрын
That tapping noise is annoying -.-
@LunaDanu19 жыл бұрын
+Anima Incuratus then don't watch
@la86169 жыл бұрын
+Luna Danu Just because it's annoying doesn't mean the video isn't educational and helpful. How about you take a chill pill and realize that not everything is an attack.
@LunaDanu19 жыл бұрын
why do you even feel the need to mention that? it's not like you're paying him for this vid. He was kind enough to upload for everyone to learn for free.
@la86169 жыл бұрын
+Luna Danu Why not? It's a fact for me, not an insult. Why did you feel the need to comment if my comment obviously offended you so much? Like, it's not that serious. Calm down and find something more useful to do with your life than getting upset at every single little comment on a YT video.
@LunaDanu19 жыл бұрын
cause it sounded like an ungrateful and an unnecessary complaint to me.
@freespirit1love10 жыл бұрын
It was really hard to get past the tapping in the audio, the pace was really slow, and the narrator seemed very distracted/unprepared and should not only speak up more (less mumbling and talking under breath) but try to enunciate better. I could not sit through the whole video, it was too annoying just trying to hear the words over all of the weak, distracted speaking, and loud noise interference tapping.
@darkthistle249 жыл бұрын
watch the video at 1.25 speed and its better... haha GL studying