Please don't misunderstand that | Article 370 hearing

[@happydaddyvlog7382]

What a great country we are in, who votes for this party which supports foreign interests over national interest

[@sawankumargupta4833]

और वोट दो कांग्रेस को

[@upscgateway9782]

@@sawankumargupta4833 kahna kya chahte ho Congress ho toh kra rahi ye drama

[@sawankumargupta4833]

@@upscgateway9782 यही की भारत को कांग्रेस मुक्त बनाओ

[@megalokhande3195]

I don't know then why people say democracy is dieing.

[@hahahaha6525]

Thanks to modi jisne digital bharat ko aage badhaya .😂😂😂. Aaj hum congress ki gaddari dekh skte h

[@sanjeevkumarkarkamkar9177]

Why the petition is accepted by the Courts after 5 years

[@gullycricket.262]

4years and 2 years been covid

[@vinayavinay7953]

Court mental nana malku all supporting pakstitan

[@shubhambhardwaj6896]

They accepted it to waste the time so that they can help India by further piling up the cases to more than 5 crore (50 million on Indian judiciary). It will roughly take only 350 years to clear this backlog with current pace of dispensing 'justice'.

[@surendr3645]

they are part of the same eco system

[@binodsarkarIN]

Because 2024 elections are on the horizon, court fixers are in action

[@SantamPandey]

As layman my understanding says Generally lawyer try to convince judges by their argument but what we see here judges are trying hard to convince lawyer . It’s amazing ,.,

[@mohapatraism]

Jusges beg sibal to agree with them as if sibal is the guiding force of India

[@raviprakashreddym2322]

First actually 370 rule has got from where from London parliament or India govt, so when the rule is prepared in parliament why this sibel is crying against judiciary he is a single amendment do to law which is parlament done

[@balsharma709]

Shameful

[@akash-yb5ds]

Nepotism effect

[@tintiniitk]

And not just any judges, judges of the Apex court of India, including the CJI himself. Shows the power that Sibal and Singhvi hold in India's judiciary.

[@blinkiblue3731]

This is what pakistan government wants and mr kapil sibal is fighting their case for free...He should be given Hilal-e-Pakistan.

[@subhasishsahooOdisha]

Unki ek hair mein jitna law ki gyan hai utna to pura WhatsApp University mein khojo

[@muhammadalijinnah9646]

​@@subhasishsahooOdisha unka ek hair teri am1 ki *hut me gusakar Teri janam hue thi. Esliye tubi utna bakas kar raha he. Love you from Pakistan ❤❤❤

[@AMBongVlog]

Isliya bengal me mafia k liye larti he o

[@gagan77100]

Then why supreme court accepted the petition?And now kashmir have governor rule have from 6 years.And former governor said pulwama was organized by amit shah

[@natramesh51]

He is getting paid which he thinks is far more rewarding than some medal or a sash to wear. Once a traitor , always a traitor

[@kamakshiyadav5980]

Why was this petition even accepted😂 Wasting time

[@manojkhedekaraayuanu]

I ABSOLUTELY agree

[@akash-yb5ds]

Because he doesn't know what to do as he got what he has due to nepotism.

[@warlord010]

Sorry bro SC kisi ke chicha ki nahi hai agar hoti to ye case accept nahi hota lol

[@shantharamprabhu4213]

Crores of pending cases and full bench is sitting daily for a dead issue. Even if verdict goes against, cabinet committee will over turn. Simple as that.

[@nitinchaudhary4252]

Please explain the powers of cabinet committee to overturn it

[@laudalassan109]

SC mein only 60000 pending hain

[@ashutoshpareek8617]

​@@laudalassan109that's not only

[@swatiguhathakurta1269]

Absolute waste of national resources

[@letmethinkv]

​@@nitinchaudhary4252this is not school😂

[@tintiniitk]

How is what Sibal's suggesting any different from what Pakistan also claims, which is that Kashmir isn't an integral part of India.

[@alphaforest]

Well I would assume Mr Sibal is more concerned about his bill than integrity of this country. They expect benefits from India but want so called freedom. I fail to understand freedom from what and even if they get what they want (again the minority that wants so called freedom); how are they going to sustain themselves, their economy and prevent annexation by our very peace loving neighbours.

[@srinivasaraghavansrilnivas1784]

Is Sibal a Pakistani

[@vinsin328]

That is claimed by India, Nehru also. It is a disputed international territory.

[@Lee-r2j-b5x]

​@@srinivasaraghavansrilnivas1784Ur Right Ur Mother too is a Pakistani 😂😂😂😂😂

[@letmethinkv]

​@@vinsin328no its not.....

[@ravindilip]

Sibal is like a cry baby in front of a calm , composed judge.

[@babukumaresh9492]

He makes fool of SC

[@explore8705]

​@@babukumaresh9492you make fool yourself , you are not expert in law but argument on constitution

[@ARVINDJAISWAL10]

Cry devil 😂

[@warlord010]

@@babukumaresh9492 kaise kaise log rehte hai yahan pe

[@Agnosticcc-x3m]

Few years ago I used to think that Congress n other parties might be corrupt but they would at least don't go against the interest of the nation & I had a very high regard for judiciary, I didn't even know the shortcomings of judiciary. But when congress n other parties opposed article 370, i was disillusioned. How openly these parties oppose decisions of national interest without fear & people don't even question them. It's shocking that even judiciary is playing with the interest of the nation. Why the heck they're wasting time on this topic, any person with common sense would say 370 was temporary. Judges behave like British lords, nobody can question them.

[@kmrao06]

Sir, you have articulated what is lingering in the minds of millions of citizens of this country. Congress and its minions have anything but interests of the country, more specifically, of the safety of majority community.

[@nalindesai09]

Judiciary is compromised by some 8 to 10 judges, last few years judgement proves that without any doubts, Modiji’s assasination plans by Bhima -Coregaon gang of Communists Naxals, Tista Bails, This case too and few more , Nehru autocratically arranged in cahoots with Abdullah’s to introduce 370 ; 35a etc to give J& K in their laps to loot including POK, in the absence of constituent assembly why can’t the Elected govt bring / Pass bill to abolish 370+ 35a, in favor of Our nation and stop the looting process of Congis, Abdullah’s, Mufti Saeed etc!

[@factionguy]

​@@rajeshmagotra1926it's his duty to divide India? What nonsense you are talking about?

[@nalindesai09]

@@rajeshmagotra1926 hay Bro, his first duty is towards our Motherland and if he is arguing against the Nation then he has no business to perform his duty which is against the People of Bharat Mata! He is an MP nominated by SP!

[@Agnosticcc-x3m]

@@rajeshmagotra1926 I'm not blaming the lawyer, for him money is important. I'm blaming the apex court for accepting this petition & wasting time by daily hearing this case.... Discussion is just play of words & beat around the bush.

[@anantmahajan7224]

Bail masters are now arguing like consttutional experts.

[@N-et6gb]

No you are

[@MrRatzz007]

Who are u?

[@HimanshuSharma-hv9vo]

This is the problem with live streaming. Rookies and non legal background people start passing judgements on the basis of media portrayal.

[@pravinmore4873]

​@@HimanshuSharma-hv9vokyu SC ne comment pass karne ka theka sirf tumko diya hai

[@chetanpatel3618]

Because unko Kam nahi karna Hai time pass

[@Existential_Bengali]

With article 368 of Indian Constitution, sovereign people of India has every sovereign right to amend any part of the Indian constitution in the interest of the welfare of the people of India. (Including article 370)....✊

[@kikum3067]

"Welfare of people" double edged sword. One should very careful to do a law in the name of welfare of people

[@abhijitsen2197]

We should not think of bringing 370, rather remove 370 from all states. It is a problem. We Indian's have moved forward from different law. UCC on the way.

[@nitinchaudhary4252]

But that is not the path that was chosen ? The amendment is not through 368 but through 370-3.. so the question is whether the part of amendment where contituent assemble of j and k rises like phoenix (through lok sabha with no respresentative of j and k) , proposes for amendment and then dies.... was this process constitutional... The question of it being a temporary provision is unambigous .. it was temporary because the clause of special provisions was later added to the chapter of constitution.. How u justify the act

[@rajeshseth7953]

Where is the will of the people.

[@camerong5358]

Mulla spotted

[@jitendrankumar9982]

We feel ashamed that we are Indians and even after more than 75 years of independence we are discussing this in supreme court...It's time for the Modi to change these things from constitution itself

[@ameysutar9932]

Kabil Sibal just looks like bharatiya. Just like a mask

[@hamiyou]

On the same note.. Sardar Patel got signed from all other Princely state.. promised to give Privy purse which was removed with an amendment in 1971.. this Case is utter nonsense and rather should all Judge and Lawyers should spend time to solve pending cases.. no Doubt that Kapil Sibal is in Congress.. case should be rather on Congress that they mis-lead whole nation for such long

[@parameahwarbt4920]

Sir this kapil S is congressman .where was he when Constitution itself was sabotaged during 75-77 when lakhs of people were jailed, killed,!?😮, Did this so called K sibal condemn Emergency anytime !? 😮 now he is lecturing on one art 370 ? His arguments are on the line of rogue pak 's stand and hatred of indians 😮

[@maheshnayak3001]

It was a fraud on the constitution to abolish the privy purses . Also the 42nd amendment added to the Preamble socialism and secularism which had been specifically debated and left out by our constituent assembly

[@Dev_1947]

excellent argument.

[@rajaroychowdhury6246]

This is a quite information. Then these fucking bustard shameless Congress politician lawyers are enjoying the AC environment of the court room @ tax payers money. Many many thanks for sharing this valuable information. Anyway I knew there is also some fucking articles imposed by the master of divide&rule policy the shameless fucking Congress Party way back in 1960s which is the root cause of Manipur violence. If you have any information regarding this please share. Regards and Jai Hind.

[@rameshiyer8185]

British Dilema still there, Even after 70 years of independence. If India is a soverign nation rules should be same throughout. If it needs the constitution to be ammended it should be done. Isnt it 🙏🙏

[@explore8705]

I want every in princely state must done plebiscite they decide there future at 1947 ( India ) took birth before 1947 there was no India country at all

[@singatakberpura]

​@@explore8705Bharat is written in the Mahabharata

[@jackal813]

Sabil is a traitor.. Should be given a permanent citizen of Pakistan. He may get Pak . Into a sovereign country..He's a intelligent man who could be of great help to Pakistan. .

[@nanjappavm3913]

Kapil Sibal always prevail upon the issues without any merits and insist Hon'ble Justice to accept whatever he puts forth and one day He will argue Indua is part of Pakisthan.

[@swami8774]

@@explore8705then you can take asylum outside india 😂

[@vinayakdhulap]

Sibal ji is teaching the bench how to think like him😆

[@subhasishsahooOdisha]

The experience in SC of Mr Sibal is more greater than the whole bench

[@anonymous-qt9qg]

Then tell use his experience for country not against the country

[@cccc2740]

@@subhasishsahooOdisha you mean exp in saving criminals

[@subhasishsahooOdisha]

@@cccc2740 Here the discussion about Art370.....not about Criminal charges. Have some basic knowledge

[@cccc2740]

@@subhasishsahooOdisha so one's past wont matter what that person represents ....have some basic human knowledge

[@paragudas3642]

Thousands of case r waiting in court. And this court is wasting time on this national issue. Is it really necessary. All knows situation before n after. Its waste of time. Why court is not speaking on pandit genocide... Still yasin malik, bitta katate to face vetdict...

[@rajeshkaul4807]

Since CJI has been bogged down on all previous occasions that's why Sibbal is making such a statement. This case should be referred to a Jury of intellectuals and all the representatives of J&K comprising of Dogras, KPs, ladakhis and educated Muslims. Sibbal is making a mess of everything.

[@networks24x73]

What ??? Educated muslim??? I had a great roll due to uncontrollable laughter.

[@supdasaaf]

Educated or not, the mindset would remain the same. Be it a puncture wala's wife/sister or a qualified techie or a business tycoon they'll all remain in a burkha. As in most of them and specifically in India.

[@networks24x73]

@@supdasaaf Ammi mar gayi Burke mein aur Beti ka naam Azaadi rakh diya

[@ककककततत]

Kapil sibal himself is confused now. I too have asked in another video, is making 370 permanent ( as per by Mr Sibal) itself is legal step? By what power J&k assembly changed the status of 370 from temporary to permanent?

[@aidelfayaz7016]

Authority...??u sd study federalism.....Indian media has changed the attitude of people of india ... federal structure of constitution,it self tells u that individual states have certain powers to decide about their lageslation

[@kartikthakur6931]

but they don't have the absolute powers of leaving the Union. @@aidelfayaz7016

[@ककककततत]

@@aidelfayaz7016 authority may be wrong word.. corrected to power

[@andha_kanoon]

@@aidelfayaz7016 such a dumb counter, India in entirety is a state, not a union of states. Individual states are divided on the basis of cultures, languages, and people, not territories. Individual states are only authorised to exercises their power on populus. Whereas all the matters are related to territorial integrity of any part in the state India come under the realm of central constitutional bodies and judiciary.

[@warlord010]

@@andha_kanoon andha kanoon name suits you better because you are dumb Article 1 of the Constitution of India declares India as a Union of states. According to Constitution India is the Union of states because the states are indestructible part of the country.

[@AbhinavSmith]

This shows Congress true face. They speak the voice of Pakistan

[@subhasishsahooOdisha]

Isme congress kaha agaya 😂

[@azharnasir7677]

Bro u knw one thing language of truth is not language of congresa just tell me what u knw about jandk ....

[@mayurrathod2992]

​@@subhasishsahooOdishayahan ! he is farmer khangress leader...

[@saurabhdas2598]

I.N.D.I.A. can even sell INDIA 😂😂😂

[@Present250]

​@@saurabhdas2598wat did ur amma indira did to Pakistan do u know... Go ask ur daad

[@srinivasangreddy8054]

Respected Honourable CJI and my Milords appreciate your time to hear on Article 370, Sir before Article 370 mother India has lost many Army jawans some mothers without their children and some Sisters who lost their most loved husbands and family members as well the genocide on Kashmir pandits why all these important things are heard are probed and because of Article 370 things have improved and my dear Milords appreciate the GOI for abortion of Article 370 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@warlord010]

From which state you are bro?

[@pooransingh1882]

Once parliament has decided, there is no going back. It is a done deal and a waste of time to debate this issue in court.

[@ramanakanchiraju2105]

As per Kapil Sibbal the Government of India should take the permission of Burhan Vani like kasmiris permission to remove atricle 370 or atleast from the stone peltors.

[@konvictzsamy3152]

In the same way who gives you power to amend article 370 ..even constitution of India itself has not given power to amend it It's simple as that if there is no alliance (370) b/w india and j&k then j&k is not a part of India anymore

[@alphaforest]

@@konvictzsamy3152let’s for the sake of argument say, “fair enough”, would you prefer an annexation?

[@nitinchaudhary4252]

Sir this a procedural issue.. kindly don't make it personal

[@nitinchaudhary4252]

​@@konvictzsamy3152article 370-3 and 368 give you power

[@Mayank612722]

​@@konvictzsamy3152Have you read the title of Article 370? It is "370. Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir"

[@sureshpratap289]

When Parliament is Supreme to make a law,to amend constitution as word #SECULAR# WAS INSERTED BY INDIRA GANDHI GOVERNMENT, THEN WHY FOR THIS SHEER WASTAGE OF COURT TIME

[@pranjalipranjali2751]

anpad ho kya?secular word was only added to preamble,it already existed throughout constitution

[@anandpatel1896]

​@@pranjalipranjali2751 Anpadh tum ho madam. Word Secular is not in the Constitution. Our Constitution promotes all the fundamentals of multiculturalism and not secularism. Even ambedkar didn't find need to insert secularism in Constitution because spirit of our country has multiculturalism. Secularism is a very hard concept, unachievable in country like india.

[@gauravsingh199]

​@@pranjalipranjali2751so preamble is not part of the constitution .. please go and read what our forefathers said about preamble

[@sureshpratap289]

@@pranjalipranjali2751 #PREAMBLE# IS FIRST FEW LINES OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. INSTEAD OF WRITING BULLYING YOU COULD HAVE WRITTEN IN A SIMPLE LANGUAGE. YOU PROBABLY DON'T THINK PREAMBLE IS SEGREGATED FROM CONSTITUTION. IMPROVE YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND NRVER BULLY

[@pranjalipranjali2751]

no ,in many case supreme court said preamble is not part of constitution@@gauravsingh199

[@vjaysan]

No other country questions its own territorial integrity.

[@rayjil7435]

Circular Argument, by Sibal. Parliament of India is Supreme.

[@thelifeanddimension]

Good argument by kapil sibbal..ask first the people or assembly of j& k what they want..u can't force..its conquest by union on it same as happening to Delhi and may happen to Mumbai soon

[@divineblessings3780]

Democracy can be too much and disadvantageous to maintaining the greater good..

[@arbitram]

What is the greater good

[@seeker7702]

​@@arbitramgreater means Majority and in Democracy simple majority always win.. Thats all.. Minority are invisible..

[@kazuma2060]

​@@seeker7702when you read constitution from what's app group.

[@kazuma2060]

​@@seeker7702 by greater goods he means national interest and security my fool friend.

[@mmsharmma6789]

Thank you sibal you gave me a choice now whom should i vote for 2024 elections

[@abhoysaha8319]

Shame on supreme court 😡😡 why they discuss on 370 i can't understand after 4 years see the ground reality before and after 370 what is happening in j&k

[@akshitsingh8890]

Shame on you why you cannot discuss 371 of Gujarat if bjp is in power there 28 years

[@SHAILESHKUMAR-lp7yu]

This madarchodu doesn't know what man and woman is. Illuminati Freemasons

[@DevPalliSri]

​@@akshitsingh8890Could you please elaborate 371 of Gujarat.

[@GowthamV07]

Because the court and congress are buddies and they support minorities over hindus.

[@Chotiburi_Khanki]

​@@akshitsingh8890plz explain 371 😂 but let me remind you 370 is still existing but 370 (a) was abrogated only 😂

[@motivationpersonalities4949]

Bhagwan ka bahut shukriya hai ese judge abhi tk court m hai...we love you sir and always support u...Plz hum sab ka. Sath ese hi nirpaksh ho k dete rhe

[@drsantoshvm]

Sibal argues central govt cannot even intiate abrogation in which country he lives , NEHRU CONFUSED IN 1950 NOW SIBAL TRYING TO CONFUSE THE CONFUSED CJI MUST know his limitations the collegium system should be done away

[@grkmurthy1157]

I am a layman and have a question for learned legal luminaries/ SC. If Indian parliament has no jurisdiction or authority to amend article 370 of Indian constitution, then SC has the jurisdiction to take up this case, and is it mandatory to abide this judgment by Govt of India in this case 🤔 . Let Mr Sibal answer this question 😮. For the fast 2 days, he was arguing whether it was permanent or temporary. Today, he made U turn. What is the credibility of such arguments other than political mileage. Hope better sense prevails on him. Jai Bharat 🇮🇳 🫡

[@gurudevasssbacademy7976]

So, Sir Sibbal, feels that even the President of India doesn't have the powers of ammending the constitution, duly recommended by the elected Govt of India. Shall i say, "i am aghast".

[@dipankarpal8054]

Mr. Sibal is saying that President has the power to abrogate provided the recommendation comes from the constituent assembly of the state. Since constituent assembly didn't exist how can President of India go ahead for its abrogation? 😅

[@saishankarmohanty]

When the state is under rule of the governor who is the head of the constituent assembly...can't he recommend? That's what happened in j&K I believe

[@rajmd5715]

Face of congress exposed to the country 😂😂😂😂😂

[@bilaln1354]

He is fighting a case. Not doing any crime.

[@guurindersinghsfather1068]

@@bilaln1354 he being born was a crime

[@kashidhampara]

What is supreme to the sc ? Interest of india or theoretical analysis of constitution?

[@umbrella8476]

Theoretical analysis obviously, interest of india lies with legislation, courts are simply unbiased custodians of constitution of India. Interest of india is subjective to time and situation where as constitution is permanent.

[@SHAILESHKUMAR-lp7yu]

Exactly

[@Chotiburi_Khanki]

​​@@umbrella8476in Berubari Case Neheru Gave a Part of Murshidabad to Jinnah by Amending article ... If You can give foreign land by amending but can't abrogate 35A and 370 😂

[@kumar-ff6ir]

@@umbrella8476 indian constitution is a living document which changes itself according to interest of india. So if theoretical analysis is supreme why so many amendments and changes

[@Agnosticcc-x3m]

​@@umbrella8476Constitution is just a man-made set of guidelines or rules. It's not permanent.

[@harihara1151]

Learned persons should also accept that the temporary is not connected at all to any constituent assembly or any representative commitee of kashmiris.. it is not federalism that is built by 370. If so then that should apply to all the 560 states. The insinuation of federalism in case of Kashmir defeats the meaning of accession which latter is supreme. Sibbal sir is confused A state can't say I am integral part of you but I will use my hands the way I want that is stupid

[@GowthamV07]

He is not confused he is working for congress the most corrupt.

[@vinayakdhulap]

In any case everything in the constitution is temporary because we have given ourselves the power to amend it and it's not that we haven't done this earlier. Some one had to do it anyway.The maharaja was stubborn ,the then PM was stubborn and so are we. Case dismissed.

[@OK-vw1xc]

But those times are different, any way we dont want to lose jk to Pak. thats why this compromise. i.e J&K state assembly need to initiate bill to complete merge into the indian constitution. not from the parliment. Now the argument is Bill is initiated by J &K President when it was under president rule, after that jk assembly session not happend... eventually mad Union territories.

[@TheEnpee]

Sibbal, sir ???

[@mohitmkom]

Its not J&K legislative assembly that mentioned in the above comments. It’s the J&k constituent assembly that has to do. It was never formed.

[@s.s2938]

My question- what sibbal will get if he wins the case??? Why he is so adamant on this case.😢

[@indiaxx]

It's all politics brother, nothing else. He's old & almost on his death bed & is rich corrupt politician. His family is well settled in rich white christian western nations. So he won't give a damn if INDIA burns or faces what not in future, he don't simply care. He just wants so called minority votes of muslims. All vote bank politics.

[@electrophorouselectrica4601]

Totally agree with you. Sibal is strictly following and sticking to his points. From his speech it seems he is not even allowing to sway here and there.

[@mehracreation6129]

Kuchh n hoga bhai🤣🤣 ye kisi k hatho pit jayega

[@ambalikadattaroy2945]

Crores of cases are pending. How Mr. Sibbal is wasting valuable time of court.

[@ambalikadattaroy2945]

J&K people are so happy. Lot of progress is being done. Why unnecessary wasting court’s time.

[@battleaxes4874]

Sibal is trying to mislead the court

[@babukumaresh9492]

He is 420

[@raibariminz2180]

@@babukumaresh9492 Through out from the court to kapilsibal

[@bilaln1354]

Because he hurt you deep

[@battleaxes4874]

@@bilaln1354 not me,you are one who is butt hurt because of aborgation of article 370 🙂.

[@MaheshPatel-zu6jp]

Nation interest and national security is Supreme.

[@subhasishsahooOdisha]

Who defines what is nation interest?

[@subhasishsahooOdisha]

@heartthrob3885 pehle apne baap ki dia hua naam se aao 😃

[@subhasishsahooOdisha]

@heartthrob3885 Apni maa se puchhke pehle baapka nàaam pata kar fir baap se puchhke apni naam pata karke ana ...fir baat karenge 😃

[@lakshyavarshney9942]

National interest is debatable not national security

[@javiadkhaliq7549]

national security or interest is smthnh else. abrogation of 370 was political agenda. plus being a kashmiri i can gaurantee u that abrogation is against national security.

[@subhajit201]

Art. 370 clause iii On advice of the constituent assembly Keyword: Advice NOT permission. When Advice is absolutely necessary it becomes Permission. This means if the advice comes, the Parliament will have to consider the abrogation. However, if there was no such advice does NOT mean the Parliament cannot abrogate it.

[@RamanSg]

What kind of argument are these people making... Are they trying to say that Article 370 was meant to be permanent whereas it was proposed as a temporary measure... They have all gone mad...

[@hemantachandra6962]

😂 yup what else ... Mr Sibbal indirectly saying that lol

[@ananyasingh1158]

What u can except from congress

[@letmethinkv]

​@@ananyasingh1158sibal is not in congress....he is in samajwadi party of UP

[@ananyasingh1158]

@@letmethinkv haaan toh SP kiske side hai yeh bhi btade

[@letmethinkv]

@@ananyasingh1158 ka2wo ki side

[@dayalpatidar3719]

सबसे बड़ी शक्ति केन्द्र "हम भारत के लोग " आशय ससंद

[@ubvis7344]

Its shameful and dangerous to see such cases in sc......👊👊👊👊👊😡😡😡

[@azharnasir7677]

Drunked man thats the right of the people of jandk ....bcs jandk has its own history it was not the part india or pakistan

[@maarunava2825]

Every day i woke up with an idea...oh God ! if those evil ideas may get succeed...what could have happened.so brother calm your brain...it happens generally when you run in total darkness.

[@udayapte548]

As a common man I feel mr signal is trying disparately to convince artical 370 is not touchable, it seems he is falling.

[@RahulThakur-rc5cr]

Perhaps, supreme kotha funding is delay this time.

[@hemantachandra6962]

Sibbal fought for Mr Banerjee too ... What else to be expected... This is just a hype for Congress fighting for J&K ... They cause issue previously again doing the same. Recently visited Kashmir and the locals are shocked with booming tourism industry. Mr Sibal is a politician and he is just doing his job... So we should look at the hype with which this case is followed than the actual judgement it want draw out.😅

[@natramesh51]

He is just a hire for money wh**e

[@thisismyuser_name]

I personally support the BJP's move of Sec 370 but people need to understand that this is a court hearing going on . We need to hear both sides and both sides need to have strong lawyers with strong arguments for their side . Kapil Sibal is just doing his job of being an advocate and Hon'ble CJI DY Chandrachud has done a great thing by taking up this case for hearing . Ek baar ka saab doubt clear ho jayega . Congress and other parties won't be able to call BJP'S decision unconstitutional . Also internationally a lot of other countries don't accept BJP'S decision on Kashmir . Ek baar proper hearing hogi about this case then those countries will also stop interfering and calling it anti democracy. Let's not hate on the judiciary and Hon'ble Justices for taking up this case.

[@rajesh14582]

If any adverse judgement comes, it will be the fall of Judiciary. Government would get a good excuse even for imposition of Emergency.

[@onlinemicroteaching6900]

Sincerity leads to success

[@vsrajasubramaniyan7136]

Even Kashmiri people accepted and welcomed the removal of Article 370. Kashmir is progressing fast now.

[@pany167]

My respect for the CJI is increased

[@harshitsrivastava8781]

It's not in his hand.. he CANNOT overrule the abrogation of article 370 irrespective of its constitutional validity. Everybody says SC's decision is final. Let me remind u, the constitution they are protecting is "For the people, By the people, Of the people". Nothing is above the people of a country and their will.

[@murarikumar4724]

Really I can't believe some one advocating article 370 for jammed and Kashmir

[@Val-tq8xh]

Mr.Sibal, your argument falls flat.

[@suryapratap9913]

How does it falls short?

[@Val-tq8xh]

@@suryapratap9913 sir, Point 1 - the preface of the provision says temporary. Point 2 - constituent assembly is required to change 370, which is formed only in the beginning and can't be convened again. It's the legislature that will be formed if they are elected and it's the governor if there is no legislative assembly. Point 3 - any constitution must be a live document and not a static one, its common sense that things that were legal 20 years ago is not legal now as we evolve there need to be a constitution that evolves. Surely you don't want the constitution to be be a book like Gita/Bible/Quran which are books that can't be amended. For people's sake, may God put this logic into your head.

[@mohideenmb]

Mr.sibbal,s argument is fair as he forcefully defends federalism of India.

[@atulgandhi7297]

please adjourned court with out agreed with him, Parliament has all rights to amend any article either temporary or permanent nature, Don't give unnecessary waitage to silly arguments

[@gks_1952]

Thats's ecosystem that congress spent 70 years building in India

[@giritali]

Sibal is fighting against India.... so Funny man !!

[@bilaln1354]

It's his job to put arguments

[@kallakudisrignananandagiri388]

May natural justice prevail..after so many decades peace has reached JK.

[@soniabhishek3000]

Why crying 😢😢😢😢😢😢 sibbal

[@N-et6gb]

Not he but you are

[@river.]

​@@N-et6gbsounds like you are

[@ex-muslim--zakirnalayak4703]

​@@N-et6gbu are crying ryt😂

[@ANILKUMAR-mu2mj]

kapin sibal is great man he won arguments 370 again in power jai jayaho

[@coolestdude321]

According to Art. 368 Parliament may in excercise of its "constituent power" "amend" by way of addition, variation or repeal any provision of "our constitution" that's also include special privileges given to state.. Because those privileges are not basic structure pf our constitution but the need of any special law for special purpose and for specific time..

[@skushafyabanoo2935]

what a healthy conversation. 👏

[@satyajeet709]

Kapil sibal - yeh article 370 aasmani kitab se aaya hai, no one can abrogate that ,not even parliament under article 368 😂😂😂

[@premlatacancercentreandimm8765]

To Say Art 370 is NOT temporary is like saying a Toddler must remain Toddler - Toddler is a permanent state .

[@aidelfayaz7016]

We have not merged with Indian union...it only says that our accession with Indian union is temporary....so ending 370 ll definitely end our accession with todays intolerant India...

[@Dpk_YT]

history padha hota to.. Ye nhi bolta... 😂😂..

[@aidelfayaz7016]

@@Dpk_YT u sd read about it...we clearly know about our history from 6 thousand years for ur kind information...rajtarangee is a masterpiece of kashmir history written in 1100 AD...dnt teach us our history..... kashmir was a separate country...so it ll be in future with the grace of almighty,....it has been a historical blunder tht maharaja has acceded with such intolerant nation...vry unfortunatly...

[@Kattar_Hindoooo]

​@@aidelfayaz7016islam came into existence just 1400 hundred years ago and Kasmir was yours for 6000 years ago🤣🤣🤣🤣...joke of the century...before muslims illegally captured Kasmir...it had been a pure Hindu state.....and it was one of the prime provinces of Akhand Bharat........read some history idiot.....read the books written by foreign travellers that visited India long before the birth of Islam.....I know you are worlds most illiterate community....simply jahil madarsachaap community.........

[@himalayasekanyakumarihindu8034]

​@@aidelfayaz7016Who are you?? If you don't like India go to Pakistan. You people don't have any say as well as a stake in J&K. J&K is a and will be part of India and POK will join J&K soon by hook or crook or war.

[@shainullaosman6924]

It's informational videos for us

[@vijayhuawei8219]

What about the genocide of Hindus in kashmir

[@luckysky1876]

Forget what one believes. The arguments placed are worth complimenting

[@ankitthebull]

There is no justice for poor people. Shame on judiciary and the way it works here.

[@drsantoshvm]

Now supreme cort is conducting a debate competetion whose english is good CJI NODS HIS HEAD now courts should be held in Hindi or other languges so that comman man can understand the court proceedings

[@ponungpullom4672]

Act like spokeperson of Pakistan. Sad to see this.

[@NRILegalAid]

Wow Such a intelligent judge our CJI

[@durairajayyappan2833]

Through an amendment to A370, the Governor of J and K was made as J and K head of state by Govt of India ( Cong Govt), without the recommendation of the state assembly or against the state Govt.

[@gandhardessai8788]

Why can we have elections in judiciary or any other better way of choosing Judges and Chief Justices?

[@DevendraPatil-vu9hh]

Anti-national elements funding for 370 case

[@parameahwarbt4920]

Sir he has deliberately misunderstood, misinterpreted the Constitution!? 😮

[@balsharma709]

These are cunning shatir peoples . Read and sell the constitution in crores in a year in presence of judges .

[@kadamnopi6988]

Iam from from Arunachal Pradesh and Being a Indigenous people of Arunachal Pradesh. Protection of ours tribal states and area from Exploitation. Or Else ready to Take up Arms.

[@mity521]

A Woke Champion 🏆 Lawyer like Mr.Sibal is a definite guarantee to lose this case..

[@kamleshlulla5303]

Good show. Demonstration of treachery

[@warlord010]

What a shame for our nation people who know nothing about J&K are here to comment anything

[@curiouscreativity2454]

Try to understand each article clause then comment please, he is not against 370 he is against the way they opted, second, he is against Dessimination of state in ut. If jammu kashmir which was a state can be converted into it then any state can too. So it's againt ethics of Constitution and basic structure of democracy. Jai hind

[@babasharma6694]

Desh drohi in action

[@FactsByPankaj]

Bhai sahab ye banda kapil sibal itna interpt kr rha my lord ko ...he is saying nothing....ye simple observation hai meri ...ye sb observar kr skte hai ...ye hai

[@Dei_Kei]

Art.370 was temporary only till the Constituition of JK was framed & finalised [1950-57]. That was the only window open for its abrogation. Once the Constituent Assembly of J&K ceased to exist upon freezing of its Constituition, the window for abrogation of art.370 closed permanently.

[@RF-bl6sb]

Ok Mr Law expert. There is nothing permanent. Even constitution can be amended from time to time , this 370 debate will be put to rest forever after this case

[@ArshkhanYT]

The elected government converted legislative Assembly into constituent assembly .😁 By the virtue of this if the hon supreme courts cites it correct then the elected government can even write a whole new Constitution 😅 There is no way to abrogate 370 legally .

[@sukhenduswaminathan4492]

​@@RF-bl6sbyes, it seems like the judges (majority of them) has already made up their minds to give a judgement in favour of the government ,as it's always done by them. The cj of India going to lecture like this. Strange indeed 😅😂😊

[@RahulThakur-rc5cr]

@@ArshkhanYT 🤣🤣stone pelters are talking about law and democracy😆

[@avinash7335]

Why not you are putting it in proper way, as the constitutional assembly ceased to exist this article automatically ceased to exist as it was temporarily in nature. So the principle has gone why there should so the subordinates should be. Article 370 which was a temporary provision of the constitution shall not be permanent in nature as in the chapter also its been part temporary provision, so you can’t say this temporary provision will continue till the constitution of India exists because constitution assembly already dissolved any they had only right to take decisions but they never took a decision whether affirmative or negative it means they have already a consent for yes.

[@PG-jv5nw]

I see an immense pressure by Sibbal on the CJI. If the govt were different then he would have ruled against the govt.

[@nitinchaudhary4252]

Good debate for people with knowledge

[@hkrao3270]

Only our chief Justice teach a hard lesson to kapil Sibal on 370

[@itspecialists8436]

The Constitution is supreme. And absolute.

[@tenglisuryanarayananarayan7334]

Your lord ship The Last minute one by CJI is correct

[@shrikantdubey63]

Wow, if the argument of Sible is acceptable, then the J and K will no more part of India ! As indian parliament, president, or any executive have no any power in J and K whatsoever 😢

[@ganesharvind867]

In future national interest can be questioned and punishable.

[@sridharradhakrishnan596]

Every indian should know that any discussion on Kashmir is not limited to Constitution only but also of Rajatharangani

[@superjrao7161]

It’s a simple logic of Kantara movie .. the J&K state merged with Indian Union because they had 370 … if article 370 is not there why will they join

[@gopinathmenon1118]

Govt can bring a bill... Mr Kapil sibal, the way they did for Delhi,bso don't waste the time of supreme court... Pack off and go...

[@belateepertin7118]

Salute to Kapil Sibal

[@nagabhushanamaravanthe2452]

I am amused by the patience of My Lords. Whether same patience available to others i.e other than Mr Sibal.

[@archit1053]

Enemies within.

[@dilipsave428]

Sibbal's confusion confounded.

[@manohar595]

देश विरोधी मामले में विपक्ष का आरक्षित एडवोकेट

[@natrajrsify]

Unlike all other industries, these guys have no time pressure to show output. They have no shame left that they have the responsibility to close tons of pending cases draging on for years.

[@CyrusInIndia]

Technicalities, Technicalities. What will be the outcome of all this. 5.5 Crore cases pending. And precious hours being wasted on this when this is done and locked dusted. JKL is not going to a state before August 5th 2019. 'Nothing is sacrosanct. Everything changes. Countries change, borders change, people change, legacies change, dynasties change. Why can't a blooming Constitution which has been changed and amended already over the years be changed actually for the betterment of the country. Sibal hiding behind pure nonsensical technicalities is bringing out his true Anti India' Cong Party Culture and while he may technically not be in Cong anymore his ideology which needs to change has not changed. '

[@ranjitbijoy]

We the people of India - elect the legislative. They have the highest power as in a democracy. The constitution can't be a rigid framework that is un ammendable .that in it's very nature is against the will of the people

[@khanbashir7836]

Very intersting