I don’t know why the mic doesn’t sound as good as it did on iMovie… 🙃
@tabletopstudios6611 ай бұрын
Doesn't matter. Fire vid anyway. 🔥🔥
@crazydog175011 ай бұрын
Eh, sounds fine to me.
@tham1911 ай бұрын
You neeeeed to do a review of the 2007 republic cruiser!!! Such a nostalgic set.
@CanadaBricks11 ай бұрын
Still as good as a vid as normal
@TheEminemWorshipper11 ай бұрын
Maybe Mike didn’t like the vid idea.
@hbtdawgz168811 ай бұрын
Its kinda silly how few clones come with the 2008 and 2013 gunships. 2002 has the best assortment FOR A GUNSHIP, tbh.
@danielaarsova-ht1go10 ай бұрын
P
@Baggedlizard9 ай бұрын
True
@granola6618 ай бұрын
the older the better
@Banglabuddy715 ай бұрын
The 2023 one is just a lil more than ab avg battle pack tho😂
@justsomeguywhokeepsgetting48852 ай бұрын
the clones are rarer in 2008 and 2013
@ceepally11 ай бұрын
The super battle droids are just such a good looking mold. I hope when we get them in the droid battle pack, they fix the clip breaking issue but nothing else!
@crazydog175011 ай бұрын
Same, I don’t wanna get mismatched B2s.
@nanorex_designs11 ай бұрын
I hope they make them shorter. Super Battle Droids are not supposed to be 8ft tall, they're only slightly taller than a person
@callumpears152311 ай бұрын
Only other change I want is a printed red dot on the chest.
@battledroid762811 ай бұрын
I just want better droid bending limbs
@Vor1ki9 ай бұрын
THEY LOOK WO GOOD
@lbricks763111 ай бұрын
Personally, I think the 2002 Gunship has the best playability, as that front section would have been really fun to play with as a kid.
@thatoscarguy996511 ай бұрын
A very inaccurate feature of course but very creative and unique.
@TheAceOfCubs10 ай бұрын
As a former kid back in 2002, the front section was def awesome to play with! I still have the Gunship set, it’s somewhere in my storage boxes 😂
@Baggedlizard10 ай бұрын
Yeah, I think that would’ve been fun too it’s just without a handle it could break easily while playing with
@mrtheunknownytquestion45929 ай бұрын
he also forgot that the top can be separated from the bottom to make a mobile command center
@fritz40411 ай бұрын
Out of all of these the 2013 is the best imo, while it would definitely be changed a few ways today it's the best and most accurate representation in playscale that LEGO has released so far
@thatoscarguy996511 ай бұрын
Completely agree with what he said that if they made the newest one the same size as the previous versions and designed it with more and better features it would’ve been way better than it is maybe even the best release. Instead it’s as good as the 2002 overall at best in my opinion it’s sadly the worst one released as the ranking score also shows in the video.
@timalgeek111111 ай бұрын
I agree with you
@lebenlarge52828 ай бұрын
@@thatoscarguy9965wouldn’t even need the extra command center with the blister pack that was out imo, just make the size equal to other years
@FRYDAY11 ай бұрын
I don’t understand why the helmet holes on the new troopers is such a big deal. Nearly every other variation of clone troopers/Mandalorian helmets have holes and it doesn’t seem to be a problem with them…
@javanmills615211 ай бұрын
It is purely the implementation. All the other ones don't stick out. I honestly wouldn't have half the issue with them if they just removed where they are supposed to go. It is really jarring seeing where they are where they're supposed to be. IMO the ultimate middle ground is removing the real location so it is easier to overlook.
@FAT_SUSAN5 ай бұрын
Telling Lego that they are bad would just be a limiting imaginations and if you’re going to make an army out of hundreds, why would you care about the difference of a millimeter
@Azact5 ай бұрын
Because it sticks out alot when looking at them from the front, and they are lazy and use the same helmet mold as they did for the cody in 2022 at-te so now every clone has helmet holes because they dont wanna make another mold without them.
@gbrow16042 ай бұрын
@@javanmills6152 If the helmets were "where they are supposed to go" the visors would cover the eyeline.
@Nerdtendo636611 ай бұрын
It’s absurd that a 10 year old set is still more goated than the most recent version
@smoothyodaproductions437311 ай бұрын
"more goated"💀
@FabuBrik11 ай бұрын
how much of that is because the coruscant variant and it's an apples to oranges comparison. I do wonder if they had released a standard variant what it would have turned out like. The world may never know.
@natewrld939711 ай бұрын
I think 2002 is the worst
@DeeperIntoTheUnknown11 ай бұрын
@@FabuBrik the world may never know? Well I HOPE they'll release a standard gunship too in the next few years!
@thatoscarguy996511 ай бұрын
@@natewrld9397the worst visually sure but in terms of figures features and value it’s way better than the Coruscant guard one today.
@jesse41937 ай бұрын
Love how the 2023 is 'less accurate because the door doesn't split' but the 2002 version's WHOLE NOSE SPLITS OPEN INTO A STATION but thats more accurate....
@KshmshnАй бұрын
Fr
@ZoomEdits4u11 ай бұрын
Ask M&R: Which set would be the best to pick up before 2024
@samuelpedigo990311 ай бұрын
Playfeature Addendum: The top of the 2002 set is connected by a few technic pins so it’s able to come apart relatively easily-making it a pseudo Dropship for the “Command Station” hidden within the nose.
@TheFirstCurse111 ай бұрын
Yep which makes it the best in terms of play features. It's 2 sets in 1.
@CloneCommander592911 ай бұрын
Lego: Has a clone trooper pilot Minifigure. Also Lego: Uses clone trooper commander and tries to pass it off as a pilot.
@AClassicBrick11 ай бұрын
I gotta stick my head out for the 2002 gunship. It has an amazing Minifigure lineup with actually enough Clone Troopers to man the ship. Also even though not in-universe accurate it has such great creative play features. I think that the inaccuracies in those can be immediatly looked over, given that the LEGO Designers probably had to work with concept arts of the models, since the movie did release in 2002. The ship can drop off its underside as a base and act as sort of a drop ship. Its great! 🙂
@Ultradahn11 ай бұрын
Unpopular opinion: people are too harsh on the new 2023 gunship
@dumbassery-ue5ko11 ай бұрын
that’s a popular opinion tho
@Cheesetactical5 ай бұрын
@mastercreas5774 it's still trash and small
@bearsausage85994 ай бұрын
If a private company can make better figs and sets, then Lego has no room to defend, or point to make.
@clone7020-c9r3 ай бұрын
agreed
@MrMan13399Ай бұрын
True
@DaffyDuckFanClub11 ай бұрын
I find it funny how no one mentions that the old Cody had a pauldron and kama which is super inaccurate, not to mention a gray visor. There’s even some sets where Rex had a visor instead of range finder. But only NOW Lego is “lazy” so silly.
@cobblerboi18209 ай бұрын
Because NOW lego is making more money, is able to make better designs, and also charging more, but did I mention also no cloths and smaller sets by the date (With a few exceptions), they have no room to be doing what they lacked in 2013 as a regular in 2023
@Azact5 ай бұрын
Because the clones were as good as it could be for that time period, they got no excuses nowadays with better technology, so they are lazy. Back then it was the best they could do with their technology of that time. Nowadays they have far better technology and clone printing and molds peaked in the mid 2010s yet they started devolving after that and became lazy. Your comment makes no sense and if anyones silly its you
@Azact5 ай бұрын
What a stupid comment, back then it wasnt obviously accurate but that was because of their limited technology of that time and they still made it as good as they could. Nowadays they charge alot more, and have bettet technology and more money, yet still messes up clone designs even though they perfected it around 2014. This is laziness and greed. So they werent lazy back then, just limited by technology, now they got no excuse with making inaccurate clones other than being LAZY
@DaffyDuckFanClub5 ай бұрын
@@Azactbro chill
@DaffyDuckFanClub5 ай бұрын
@@Azactalso how does limited technology make you add a Kama and pauldron to a character that doesn’t have either?
@BababooeyYcho66T4 ай бұрын
I had the 2013 gunship, I got it for Christmas and I absolutely loved it. I would come home from school and spend hours building it since I wasn't a very fast builder at the time and there was a lot of bags. One day, my dad was cleaning the house when I was gone, hit my shelf that had it on the top, it fell and turned into a crashed gunship. I've never recovered from it and to this day I get extremely paranoid with people touching my legos now. I might buy a new one for my new apartment by myself just to recuperate.
@viperson981811 ай бұрын
I think 2023 is close. Hopefully the designers hear us and a classic style gunship in like 1-2 years will overall be an improvement from the 2023 coruscant gunship with their new style of approach and size. Currently the 2023 set feels incomplete. (Darn Disney for making canon that standard p2 troopers can pilot these gunships.
@CloneCommanderCrater110210 ай бұрын
It makes perfect sense that pilots can wear regular clone armor when piloting ships in atmosphere. Literally the ONLY reason clone pilots wear specialized helmets is to act as life support during space flight, which they very much do not need when flying in atmo.
@ninopineau-chapell7388 ай бұрын
i think this set is made to be combined with the brand new battle back released today to make like a sort of coruscant battle
@devenpapineau62618 ай бұрын
what when did disney show that? There's still a lot of disney star wars content I'm yet to get to...
@viperson98188 ай бұрын
@@devenpapineau6261 the more recent Disney shows negate regular Pilots and opt to show standard P2 clones piloting gunships.
@Azact5 ай бұрын
@@devenpapineau6261mando season 3 in the episode with grogu flashbacks, he is chased by gunships with shocktroopers as pimots
@Bo-Katan11 ай бұрын
The first one is so iconic to me
@Bo-Katan11 ай бұрын
Sshhh it’s my secret identity…..
@Bo-Katan11 ай бұрын
Bo-Katan is secretly SpongeBob
@jbawesome564011 ай бұрын
This is one of my favorite comparisons you’ve ever done. This one is so 🔥
@luisfuentes384610 ай бұрын
People here arguing about which gunship you chose, meanwhile I’m just looking at each of them with awe because I was never able to get ANY of these gunship models and I really wanted them as a kid.
@ChalsSyah11 ай бұрын
I love Ryan, he makes me smile with his reviews ❤
@Starkiller38708 ай бұрын
Perfect representation of the two sides of M&R's viewers. Personally I strike a middle base I like his reviews and content and comparisons but I really hate it when he gets overly critical and nitpicks over very minor things
@Jush052011 ай бұрын
Each gunship has a great thing about it, I love all of them
@BotBoy-un3pz11 ай бұрын
When a 15-year-old set looks better than one from 2023
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
I think the 2023 build techniques are great but some of the accuracy degrading choices clearly aren’t:
@PteranoLiv11 ай бұрын
@@MandRproductionsthis
@katesandoval94518 ай бұрын
Shut your mouthhhhhh
@djurrevisser14617 ай бұрын
@@PteranoLivShut Up
@qt55006 ай бұрын
I think that’s because the ship in canon wasn’t designed for combat and had the guns as more of a self defense tactic.
@2stopmoitonmaker_6611 ай бұрын
in my opinion I like the 2008 the most because I just love the clone wars clones troopers (no not the faces but that's not important right)
@bearsausage85994 ай бұрын
Their faces look like they just ate bacon and beans
@DiegoBenavidesGT11 ай бұрын
Man I knew Ryan was going to have the Coruscant Gunship dead last, and I really wanted to like it, but the more I think about it, the more it shows that it really isn't good enough. Now I'm here again contemplating how to get the money to either: a) Get the new one and mod it, b) Buy the 2013 one which has always been my favorite, or c) Buy a moc that actually delivers. Or wait another 5-10 years until Lego releases another one, who knows. So fxcking frustrating
@thatoscarguy996511 ай бұрын
I’m buying a custom one. Check out the brick vault and rich boy jhae ones they’re so much better than the junk version Lego gave us this year. Of course you can order the parts gradually too if you can’t afford them all right away. The 2013 one is very nice but custom ones are definitely comparable and much cheaper plus you get the option to go with a different version than the regular color scheme.
@MoxJester11 ай бұрын
At least ur being real with urself. I’ve seen so many people blindly like the coruscant gunship because they were unable to get any of the previous gunships. It’s a shame because all Lego needed to do was slightly update the 2013 model and put the coruscant guard scheme on it. Would’ve been an amazing set.
@tomgu228510 ай бұрын
Okay sheep
@controlvids60798 ай бұрын
Well if you actually saw the clone wars, then you would know that the clone wars version of the gunship doesn’t have that arch area, so that “cut out a piece of the gunship” is actually inaccurate. Also that isn’t just the Jyn Erso face, it’s also the Jane face from Marvel, who is played by the same person, at least the live action one. And there are helmet holes on the phase one helmets, use your eyes. True the helmet holes are above where they “should be” but clone visors never attached to those nubs, they attached further up on the helmet. The helmet holes are fine, Padme is fine.
@Aaronian9910 ай бұрын
Im really happy with the helmet holes on the coruscant guard, as long as they will release more of them in a smaller set without holes. That way we can use the gunship ones as specialists
@Azact5 ай бұрын
They wont, because they are lazy and use the same mold
@Brave_Sir_Robin11 ай бұрын
The figures really could have almost bailed out 2023 if they were what they should be. Hopefully, lego is watching this and taking notes
@LynCubed11 ай бұрын
As someone who has never owned a Lego Gunship, these are my thoughts on each of them: 2002: looks good for the time, jedi bob is awesome, and I love how the clones look, I don’t like the balls that fold out, droidekas are awesome 2008: the best looking one imo, plo koon is epic, looks roomy and that command station looks awesome, the little monkey guy one the side is cool looking 2013: 10/10 minifigs, cockpit is an improvement, i still don’t like those little balls that fold out, I miss super battle droids, flick fire missiles look silly on the top 2023: shock troopers look great (idrc about helmet holes), looks a little lazily made, palpetine looks great, padme is cool but I just wish they use the 2013 face, not a big fan of the replacements for the ball turrets on the wings, seems to be extremely sturdy.
@notamethadict5 ай бұрын
the balls that flip out are accurate though
@ILuvvFent3 ай бұрын
@@notamethadict yeah but honestly the balls on the sides dontt look that good
@benabresch662011 ай бұрын
2002 was my favorite lego set as a kid. Was the crown jewel of my childhood collection. I can't argue it being better than the 2013 set, but Lego doesn't really give us sets like this anymore, because of battle packs and stuff. 2002 will always hold a special place in my heart.
@cheesecakepizzaria933511 ай бұрын
I can see why all the others are great but the 2013 one always holds a place in my heart. It was the first “big Lego set” I got.
@MoxJester11 ай бұрын
Was my first big Lego set as well. Still got it on display
@batsamd11 ай бұрын
I ended up selling my 2008 RGS just because it was so big and I kept knocking off the front turrets. The current CG RGS being smaller than past versions actually has me interested in the set, but I’d prefer classic colors. Surprised you didn’t mention that the 2008 RGS had alternate nose art stickers, I would consider that a play feature, the buyer gets to choose what nose art they wanted.
@Cpt_Dreihead11 ай бұрын
I love the play set comparison. The features are sometimes so ramdom. :)
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
Not anymore :(
@PHM1989-z7b11 ай бұрын
@@MandRproductionsUnfortunately, they aren't
@Habsfan5674411 ай бұрын
My personal favourite is the 2013 but the 2023 gunship was my first so I really like that one as well
@alanhorkan11 ай бұрын
"moot point" is the phrase, not "mute point".
@shaunw909211 ай бұрын
That thumbnail is great, I don't think I realized how iconic the front profile of the gunship is until now.
@MaximotheMemer11 ай бұрын
I hope we get more super battle droids in the future, they are so cool!
@CapybaraEnthusiast88211 ай бұрын
the CG gunship is so unimaginative compared to the 2008 there’s so much less going on it’s quite lifeless actually
@Mandotransformers.11 ай бұрын
GUNSHIP AHOY!!!!!!
@supersoldiergames324211 ай бұрын
Overall a good video and I mostly agree but I feel like it is to subjective with to much nostalgia talking.
@tinyjammer11 ай бұрын
I'm glad you finally did a comparison of the gunships, I was waiting for it! Awesome video 👍
@raptor843111 ай бұрын
Great vid, keep up the good work
@omarbaba989211 ай бұрын
It’s ridiculous how many bootlickers say we shouldn’t have any issue with how much Lego’s been cheaping out recently
@bearsausage85994 ай бұрын
Same type of peeps that prolly believe both political parties are not in this together, and aren’t trying to subvert trick and manipulate us. And government good.
@omarbaba98924 ай бұрын
@@bearsausage8599 Americans try not to bring politics into everything challenge: impossible
@DoubleAstudio24411 ай бұрын
I really love the 2013 gunship it’s so accurate and BEAUTIFUL
@NicoDiAngelo02111 ай бұрын
I've been looking forward to this
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
And I've been procrastinating lol
@NicoDiAngelo02111 ай бұрын
@@MandRproductions Don't worry the video quality is really good
@briandain843211 ай бұрын
I luv mixing bad-guys, especially when colors match across trademarks, so Blue Mandelorians are Cobra, but this just Screams CRIMSON GUARD. If Lego hadn't been so crappy with the Advent Calendar Fox & ONLY TWO MORE TROOPS I'd get this, but as is, it's insulting.
@lbricks763111 ай бұрын
That thumbnail was sharp as hell.
@AdamVanter11 ай бұрын
love the reviews - highlight of my week 😅🎉
@toshihideto11 ай бұрын
2002 gunship was the first lego SW set i got as a kid. It was my gateway drug. Loved it, and I still have it, but unfortunately the stickers are cracking and peeling off. Such a great set tho.
@DannyLikesTrains11 ай бұрын
Cool and all but wheres the microfighter and battlepack version comparison at???
@controlvids60798 ай бұрын
Well if you actually saw the clone wars, then you would know that the clone wars version of the gunship doesn’t have that arch area, so that “cut out a piece of the gunship” is actually inaccurate. Also that isn’t just the Jyn Erso face, it’s also the Jane face from Marvel, who is played by the same person, at least the live action one. And there are helmet holes on the phase one helmets, use your eyes. True the helmet holes are above where they “should be” but clone visors never attached to those nubs, they attached further up on the helmet. The helmet holes are fine, Padme is fine. Stop complaining.
@tomasmorales81411 ай бұрын
“Stop stop he’s already dead” M&R when comparing 2023 gunship to the rest 😂
@noethomas52111 ай бұрын
You really can't stop hating the Coruscant guard gunship...
@wockactavis23 күн бұрын
its just a downgrade
@timalgeek111111 ай бұрын
I have 2 Gunship 2013 (and UCS Gunship ) Think,this version the best play model in Lego now )
@Dragonicefire1977 ай бұрын
I got the 2002 because my uncle gave it to me and it hurts that he didn't mention the capability of saperating the transpotrt section from the rest.
@Deuce_and_a_half11 ай бұрын
10 years ago for my 10th birthday I chose the 2013 Gunship over the AT-TE set that came out at the time. I really wanted both. So when it came to Xmas and I asked for the AT-TE I was upset to hear it was already out of production (I was young and wasn’t informed on Lego and when exactly they released new waves and stuff) (now that I’m thinking about it it might’ve been the Gunship for that years Xmas and the at-te for my birthday the next year) 10 years later I’m so glad I chose the Gunship. It’s the best looking, and best overall Gunship. In addition to Lego releasing a basically identical AT-TE to the 2013 one. And now I can finally have both. I was so happy the AT-TE had the same cockpit build as I thought that was perfect with the older one. I remember staying up late while on holiday to order it online the day of its release and annoyed at slow lodge Wi-Fi
@olie640310 ай бұрын
Lego and hasbro are very similar to me. Both generate more and more money every year and disappoint even more each year whilst increasing the prices drastically. It’s very sad
@GunDoggo11 ай бұрын
the helmet holes are for customisation the whole point of Lego is to make things and customise them your way
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
They literally ruin the helmet profile
@GunDoggo10 ай бұрын
kinda makes sense
@ninja_raider275711 ай бұрын
The Lego Star Wars designers need to stop watching empire strikes back. They take the Yoda quote “size matters not” too seriously
@IamFc2411 ай бұрын
Askmandr: How come you wanted the holes for The phase 2 clones but now you hate them?
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
I asked for pizza and then the pizza came burnt and soggy.
@GalacticPrints11 ай бұрын
Love your videos ! Keep it up
@Dun3_Waffl3z11 ай бұрын
Hol up, am I the only one who thinks commander thorn would've been a great choice for the newest gunship?
@bearsausage85994 ай бұрын
Imagine a 200 dollar gunship that included the droid ships in that scene too, plus alotta commando droids.
@dylanchicorel11 ай бұрын
For me, I have so much nostalgia for the 2008 Gunship, it’ll always be the best one for me
@mutley777311 ай бұрын
After the newest AT-TE I had high hopes for the Coruscant gunship but it pretty much failed for me in every way. As an owner of multiples of the previous version the fact that this was so far from compatible means I have already started buying parts to Mod the 2 I plan to buy to match the scale and features of the others.
@thatoscarguy996511 ай бұрын
Completely agree I was excited for the newest one when I heard they’d finally be releasing another one and then I was thoroughly disappointed. So much so I’m not going to bother getting it and I’ll just be getting a custom one online instead which will be the first time ever that I’ll be doing that. I was 14 at the time when the 2013 released and reluctantly chose Jabbas sail barge instead. Had I known at the time that the gunship would be stupidly expensive after retirement I would’ve chosen it and got the barge later but oh well.
@cobblerboi18209 ай бұрын
@@thatoscarguy9965 Thars why I am so happy I chose the 2013 AT TE and gunship over the rancor pit and jabbas sail barge
@dubart591811 ай бұрын
I have the 2002 one and am contemplating selling it. But its pretty well used.... I might sell it but hold onto the figs.
@Bleedblxck8 ай бұрын
I hate how much Lego relies on stickers instead of printed bricks these days. I recently bought the new Jurassic World T-Rex skull and the plaque on it is a sticker! CMON
@Hippolestrian11 ай бұрын
2013 will always be my favorite, but one thing you have to give props to lego for is releasing a clone wars era Padme and Palpatine in the most recent iteration. Before this, I'm fairly certain you hsd to either get the venator playscale or Palpatine's arrest for a Palpatine figure, and Padme only came in the Malevolence set. The two shock troopers are really decent in my opinion, helmet holes being a moot point because it's lego. My biggest issue with minifigures in the most recent one is that Fox is supposed to be Thorn in the episodes from which it's featured. Despite this, I plan on getting the 2023 gunship for it's minifigures and for the tons of red pieces and republic Insignias that can be used for tons of Mocs. It's not a set that should be bought for accuracy, however it has a ton of value for getting moc bricks and minifigures for other clone wars era builds.
@platnumring756810 ай бұрын
You cant hate on the newest Padme yes it may be the same face from a 2016 minifigure but from the picture i saw its pretty accurate for the Padme in that animated series. The 2023 gunship isnt as bad as you make it to be. Not all redesigned Star Wars sets are horrible. I know it has none of the features of previous gunships but the 2023 gunship is from an entirely different series.
@bearsausage85994 ай бұрын
My girlfriend pointed and laughed at us saying “it’s too small”
@_Eternal-Darkness_11 ай бұрын
I think all are cool in their own way, I only have the newest version, but at some point, I'd like to get the 2013 set or the first set, something about those OG clones
@GavinLepley11 ай бұрын
Petition for Lucasfilm to make that sick fighter jet alternate build on the 2002 box canon.
@TheFirstCurse111 ай бұрын
You forgot to mention that the 2002 model can seperate the top and become a carrier gunship while dropping the base and troop carrier as it's own mobile base. That makes it the best play-wise to me. It's 2 sets in 1 in that way.
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
It can?
@TheFirstCurse111 ай бұрын
@@MandRproductions Yep. You showed it in your own review at 17:45. That's where I knew it from. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fKHaqZx9qZKer80si=x7EEB2S8y-c4PeZI
@PteranoLiv5 ай бұрын
@@MandRproductionsyeah you actually showed it in your first comparison
@bearsausage85994 ай бұрын
@@PteranoLivbro forgot about Legi
@PteranoLiv4 ай бұрын
@@bearsausage8599 huh? Wut?
@CabbageFace_11 ай бұрын
I love that side sticker on the 2008! soooooo cool with the bombs etc
@jackstar89044 ай бұрын
I agree with everything you said except about the bubble gun on the Coruscant Guard gunship, because the coruscant guard gunship doesn't have bubble guns to sit in
@monkeybumlover513310 ай бұрын
i wish they just added 2 pilot clones to all of the gunships
@bearsausage85994 ай бұрын
Yellow clone=pilot
@dragonrayz75274 ай бұрын
I remember having a poster of the 2002 lego republic gunship. And just yesterday I made my young me's dream come true by getting the 2023 gunship. Even though it has less play features I can always make modifications to it and give it more play features.
@JesusReigns-fg8pf11 ай бұрын
The newest Gunship actually scales to the minifigures better than the others. Minfigures don't scale to humans exactly, so it's hard to be exact and maybe a few other proportions were wrong, but in that area it is actually better. I agree it has many other problems, but for being smaller the new Gunship gets a bit too much shape. If you don't believe me, check a size comparison with a model that was trying to get it scaled properly to minifigures.
@gosigrattagosigmus851011 ай бұрын
2008 one is my favorite.
@SergeyPoliakov11 ай бұрын
But I have to say that 2023 gunship display is amazing. It looks amazing. But everything else is... meh idk ok I guess
@crimson_nord2028Ай бұрын
I just love the extra details in plo koon’s gunship. Heat features and paint jobs!
@Walnuthead7248 ай бұрын
Commander Thorn should’ve been used instead of fox
@Noobcx95xx11 ай бұрын
You can fit in weapons and some supplies in the 2023 gunship
@HCKRBRO11 ай бұрын
Hey ryan, will you ever build the secret lego melovalance (hope i spelled that correctly) set from the quest of r2-d2 game?
@brickmanusa11 ай бұрын
What a video! Great video & content keep it up!🔥🤙
@Willow_Wyllt11 ай бұрын
It's kind of embarrassing that the 2023 gunship has a comparable amount of play features as the UCS display model
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
“It’s a kids toy”
@DrMindmasher11 ай бұрын
I took a poll the other day where I asked every person on earth if they knew that M&R doesn’t like the helmet holes and amazingly every single person on planet earth knows, can we please be done now?😭 He could make a video about a death star poly bag from 2006 and he’d still find a way to bring them up, like, “I think the choice to use a sand blue piece for the dish was a bad choice, ALMOST AS BAD AS THE HELMET WARTS ON CLONES TODAY!!!”
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
As long as Lego keeps putting them in sets that don’t need them I have to talk about them.
@magnus931611 ай бұрын
The only thing that imo could be improved on the 2013 model is to hide the handle better or make it white and to better cover the technic going through the middle or make it white as well. Then youd have the perfect playset thats an amazing display piece as well
@jichunmo363411 ай бұрын
For me the 3rd one and the 4th one are the best
@rivuletscug2 ай бұрын
the 2013 Gunship was my second favorite set I owned as a kid - my favorite being the millenium falcon I have
@HuxleyBerg11 ай бұрын
Thumbnail goes hard. 2013 is peak, just built one recently 🙌
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
Thank you my guy Piercyn worked hard on that one!
@gorillatube336311 ай бұрын
Amazing thumbnail ryan!
@aIexait11 ай бұрын
Don't forget, the 2023 Gunship has the entire senate included
@MandRproductions11 ай бұрын
Shooooot
@Multicentregames3 ай бұрын
2008, despite being made 12 years ago, is by far the best. Had the best play features, had the best doors, and it’s the only one I have
@deltashinoda18211 ай бұрын
Call me crazy but as someone who has owned all 4 of these, the 2023 gunship is genuinely in contention with the 2013 model for best gunship for me. I just have a tonne of fun swooshing it around and the build is fantastic
@viperson981811 ай бұрын
Yeah the 2023 one compact size is very nice.
@thatoscarguy996511 ай бұрын
I’d own the 2008 or even 2002 versions in a heartbeat over the newest one. Very disappointed when it was revealed glad some like it though wish I could appreciate it more but I just can’t.
@katesandoval94518 ай бұрын
@@thatoscarguy9965it least your all of us are lucky we have a new gunship dummy
@thatoscarguy99658 ай бұрын
@@katesandoval9451 I don’t look at it that way I view it as Ryan does which is a significant step back from previous versions which doesn’t make sense. The tie fighter and x wing being down sized wasn’t as bad because there was no loss of features and proper design. This gunship suffers from both. The 2013 and 2008 had far better proportions and weapons that didn’t detract from the look significantly, much more features, and much better figures. And because the Lego group took so long to release another one it was far more important to get it right and they missed the mark in many areas.
@katesandoval94518 ай бұрын
@@thatoscarguy9965 I don’t care we are lucky we have a gunship I would have the new gunship over the 2002 and 2008 gunship just look at the 2002 gunships bubble turrets there ugly I actually mean hideous and the 2008 gunship doesn’t have a handle why don’t u shut up
@sebestyenhriczu951011 ай бұрын
While I was watching this video, I had the idea that you could put up a picture of the real gunship from the side view and then compare the Lego gunships’ sideviews to it. That way we could really see the proportions. Also you mention that the 2023 gs does not have separable doors and that is a minus for accuracy (which is correct), but you don’t say anything about the 2003 gs’s front being able to open up and its hinges can be seen from the sides, which in my opinion are much larger inaccuracies. I think you were too harsh on the 2023 model, just look at the 2003 one. It is much less appealing than the 2023 model. It is more blocky, more studs are showing, inaccurate colors and primitive minifigures (which at the time were good, but today they look plain bad). So I would have ranked the 2023 gunship no lower than 3rd place and the 2003 gunship would definately be in the 4th place.
@conner984211 ай бұрын
Clones peaked in 2002
@starbrickv516211 ай бұрын
I waited for this video
@lew011 ай бұрын
I miss having alternative builds on the back of the box.
@joesimoncini291211 ай бұрын
On the in universe coruscaunt gunship there actually isn’t a spot for clones to fit in on the wings
@loganschmidt18374 ай бұрын
"If it's just a kid's toy, where are the play features?" Bro cooked
@brixbybit104811 ай бұрын
If lego were to make more Republic Gunship models in thr next few years. Would you prefer them to recolour the courascant guard gunship for consistency. Or would you rather a new, larger model with more details for another $20 (total $160)
@bearsausage85994 ай бұрын
Battle of umbara model, with actual floodlights?
@joshuam658711 ай бұрын
You put a ton of thought and perspective into this vid. I have 2 of the new ones but thats about it now i think. Wish i could get some of the 2013 ones at a decent price.