LEGO Star Wars UCS IMPERIAL STAR DESTROYER Comparison! (10030 vs 75252 | 2002 vs 2019)

MandRproductions compares the 2002 LEGO Star Wars 10030 UCS Imperial Star Destroyer with the 2019 LEGO Star Wars 75252 UCS Imperial Star Destroyer! The new set has so many improvements over the OG model and actually includes Minifigures! I go in-depth and compare the set in every way possible, you can comment your thoughts below.
- - - - - - - - - -
Links To Cool Things.
Merch - teespring.com/stores/mandrpro...
Vlogs - / mandrproductionsxtra
Instagram - / mandrproductions
Twitter - / mandrtweets
Subreddit - / mandrproductions
My Chair: bit.ly/2PWNJf3 ("MandR" for 10% off!)
Business Inquiries - [e-mail]
Shop Amazon with this link to support the channel! :) www.amazon.com/shop/mandrprod...
- - - - - - - - - -
Best of MandRproductions: • Best of MandRproductions
- - - - - - - - - -
#LEGOComparison #LEGOStarWars #LEGO

[@MandRproductions]

Honestly in love with the 2019 model! What do y'all think?

[@youngharambe10]

I really like the 2019 one too it’s a little longer and it has a nice new look with a different colour and more detail with better pieces! The only thing about the new one I don’t like is the price but that doesn’t matter too much

[@christianweber7435]

It’s impossible to say with a straight face “I like the 2002 star destroyer better

[@mattgew6772]

I’d say it’s perfect

[@grampaplays9851]

U need to lift bro

[@kyleruiz7167]

The new one is by far the best and most accurate! Btw the Turrets on the 2019 one are accurate to the studio model that they use, it being a MK 1 it's supposed to have those beefy ones while the MK 2 are the one with the octuplet turrets.

[@und1249]

This is getting out of hand! Now there are two of them!

[@thedeadlymauraderthedeadly801]

I’m the 100th like :3

[@alexrivera9252]

And a few Millennium Falcons. :3

[@thotpoliceofficerjameson3538]

Retreat its a trap!

[@bruhboi1005]

A Person after seeing the movie it’s like the Death Star never happened

[@t_rex1299]

In the new movie there is like a hundred of them

[@hollydinsmore7906]

“With the star destroyers there’s no swoosh ability”

[@CCswift]

I beg to differ...

[@emperorredabilitysfollowin2753]

R/swoosh

[@tyler_bt3326]

Holly Dinsmore when I was about 6 my cousin proved this wrong when he tried to pick it up. My UCS Star Destroyer swooshed quite capably for a solid half second before disintegrating against my bedroom floor

[@bergiesbricks9618]

*swooshability

[@kellenpies160]

KiLl3R Mem3StAR please tell me you were able to rebuild it

[@thenerdsarecoming]

Now find a shield gate and crash them into each other.

[@jacksparrow6041]

rouge one

[@domb7788]

And a hammer head corvette

[@thenerdsarecoming]

@@domb7788 And maybe glue or some inventive building techniques to get it to stick? Maybe a stand?

[@abstract0014]

@@domb7788 how about a fist?

[@TidmouthSheds]

With the tantive IV as the hammerhead corvette

[@penderrin1637]

Most important thing I learned form this vid 12 lbs ≠ 1 ton

[@danarchy7232]

Did you think that it did?

[@Itzy066]

lol same

[@bostyt50]

You're 12

[@penderrin1637]

@@bostyt50 lol, I'm 17 but ok

[@pokergroupdigital5290]

Americans🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@peterfitzmaurice2491]

The 2019 one is obviously better for display, but the old one was better for price.

[@booty_hunter4207]

@Thedwarvenpower but back when they were released they definitely didnt cost 2k

[@Baron_]

Search the 2002 ucs star destroyer fon Ebay and it is usually 500 used

[@ryannolfi8566]

Agreed but I don’t like how he made it a draw.

[@Dylan-kq6gb]

@Palpatine definitely not

[@thewindow5663]

I found one used for 100 which was such a steal

[@willemmmmm]

Am I the only one who thinks the best difference is the colour?

[@DiscoDevil197]

Plastic decolours over time. That old star destroyer probably had the same colour as the new one

[@sanavdurgam8164]

A Seyed that was the color of grey for old LEGO pieces, the newer ones have a hint of blue in them

[@basicbugha]

Ich schaue, wo ich gefragt habe

[@ThePetaaaaaa]

Yes you have to be the only one. It's not like they literaly are different colors, say light gray and light bluish gray. No one would ever notice. Only you did

[@jonahday7877]

No I agree with you it's way better looking than the old one with colors

[@caseybouquet]

Why not both? $1,130+ Oh! Fair enough

[@gemstonegynoid7475]

Kitbash the two of them together

[@theo9052]

@@legofanzach It's more like the actual price of the oldest one xD

[@legofanzach]

@@theo9052 yep it's gone down in value gonna try to get it in 2 years when I have $2000+ USD to spend on it

[@Runmindor]

Just finished building the 2019 one less than an hour ago and I must say it’s one of the best Lego Star Wars sets I’ve built in my life, if not the actual best. What an absolute beauty.

[@GuitarFabi]

Just a question. If I may ask. Where do you "display" this set? Do you have a separate room just for it? Since it looks pretty big.

[@problemchild3610]

Fabi I know you’re asking him, but I own it as well, and I have it displayed on a stand in my living room, actually a really nice display item, good for a conversation starter

[@GuitarFabi]

@@problemchild3610 That's the ultimate fan experience :D That's how things should be!

[@fredoran]

How long did it take to build

[@johnnybaxter1953]

@@fredoran hi :) mine took me 2 weeks to build but I was spacing it out a bit

[@Cloofinder]

I'm suprised there was no mini Falcon to attach to the back of the star destroyer like it did in TESB.

[@Cloofinder]

@Jacob Beal I know, but still.

[@keyboardwarrior327]

@Jacob Beal I'm sure there are a few minor differences, but they look pretty much the same to most people. They could have included a few extra bits to modify the set to look like the one in Empire, like how the UCS Falcon has two satellite dishes.

[@therecklesshd9515]

It was in A New Hope

[@Miloreo18]

Cloo Viewer the Empire Strikes Back Star destroyer Avenger is an ISD II, devastator from A New Hope is ISD I

[@thetimeywimeycornerofhisto4954]

I know it was a new hope star destroyer, but on the 2019 model you could bend back the Comms tower and it looks like the isd 2

[@WattoXtreme]

I think you should split design into two categories: looks and stability

[@aleksisuuronen5969]

It's not really a fair comparison since the older one is almost 20 years old... obviously it ain't gonna hold like it did when it was new

[@comebackguy8892]

He already has.... One is called design and the other is called playability. One thing I have learned by watching lego masters is that playability = stability. Mandrproductions does unfortunately not understand that and instead count stability as "design"....

[@maycontainnuts3127]

One thing I'm always concerned about with my Lego sets is their swooshability.

[@Azulkins]

Same. If it don't swoosh, it don't matter,

[@wzl717]

Your not meant to be able to “play” with a ucs

[@protion_2312]

@@wzl717 you are ment to get a joke

[@nicksade5154]

@@wzl717 thats the joke bro 💀

[@wzl717]

@@nicksade5154 it’s not very funny

[@brianchristyb]

I spent a chunk of my weekend rebuilding the 2002 set that my brother had kepts in a box in his garage. It was a good time. While the new one does look great and is an improvement in many ways, I would like to point out that it's also made almost two decades later. For it's time the 2002 set was amazing, and still looks pretty damn good.

[@lethalassassin1754]

I like both but the 2002 design looks better to me more like lego. These people review sets like they’re supposed to look lifelike. The more dull grey gives it original trilogy vibes which i love.

[@shadowxxe]

@@lethalassassin1754 its a UCS set its supposed to look life-like and true to the orginal. if it was a normal lego play set sure but its not

[@illegalewahrheiten2911]

@@shadowxxe No Lego set can look life like and true to the original. For example Lego can not do complex color schemes and fine details. There is always a compromise. Lego tend to look better when it is approximate instead of trying to squeeze a round peg in a square hole.

[@drfrenchfrythe3rd]

I want a venator class ship like this.

[@oldsmay]

drfrenchfry I would buy that

[@dankerthanclanker]

Make one, lad.

[@rookcapcoldblood2618]

They made one like this. It came with Chancellor Palpatine, two of his personal Senate Guards, and a couple of clone troopers. It even works to scale, since a Venator was smaller than an Imperial Star Destroyer. It costs the same as that old Destroyer did back in the day. Just look up Lego Republic Cruiser, and you'll find it.

[@lothgaming4242]

Rook/CapColdblood are you talking about the one from lepin?

[@ray5357]

Your dream has come to fruition

[@Mystery_Meat]

“Swooshability” needs to be a new category for airplanes and flying ships

[@jaileach693]

Thats basically playability

[@aksis2133]

I would’ve given Playability to the 2019 one instead of it being a draw, since not only do you get minifigures but you can also dock the Tantive IV underneath, not to mention also having a mini Tie Fighter, whereas the 2002 one only has a blank space with nothing going on. It’s not much, but I think it’s a large enough advantage to give the nod to 2019.

[@schuschu121]

"its $700 and a lot of people have something to say abut that but it DOES come with two mini figures and a display plaque." oh why didnt you say so before? 2 mini figures and a DISPLAY plaque?! so worth it. that thing should honestly be something like 200-400. it doesnt even come with a bunch of stormtroopers of darth vader or the emperor

[@commonavionics6069]

shust it has over 4,000 pieces. What so you think your playing for.

[@schuschu121]

@@commonavionics6069 its plastic, 4000 pieces of plastic that definitely cost them near nothing to produce

[@commonavionics6069]

shust your also paying for the Star Wars name and also the designing of the LEGO because something like this isn’t made in a afternoon.

[@mrpineapple3655]

$1200 is a fair price, it has big plate pieces which are expensive for lego to make

[@nhatminh468]

its not only plastic, but the designers time, creativity, etc.

[@pacfizzy]

M&R: *talking about 2 deadly ships that can kill anything in seconds..* Cory: *building a gingerbread house*

[@Emetoss]

Hmm a good video you have done, young one. Strong with the force you are

[@clonetrooper8428]

Yes Master Yoda. You are correct.

[@skique2910]

Black tar heroin I took, die I I roll over on my side I will

[@popyoshi069]

Master Yoda subscribed to you, I have don’t worry no seagulls, I have

[@Emetoss]

@@clonetrooper8428 A clone you are. Betrayed us you have. (lightsaber ignite sound) terminated you must be

[@readmyusernamecauseitssoreally]

Yoda talk would be more like "good video you have done"

[@Itzy066]

WAIT! ON THE COMMAND BRIDGE THE RADAR CAN MOVE, SO WOULD THAT MEAN THAT THE 2019 HAS MORE PLIABILITY?!?!

[@Itzy066]

@Nikolai Belinski That is true, but its just now shown in the movies

[@Itzy066]

*not

[@beachbat2956]

But you can put the tantive 4 in the hangar of the older one

[@Mr_Kiwi]

Respect for Cory just sitting quietly in the background. He’s very polite

[@tombauer5588]

17:15 one handed person has left the chat

[@ShizuruNakatsu]

I'm happy I have two hands because I already ordered the ship before watching the video. My two hands should make the building process a bit easier too.

[@gracedolipro8711]

@@ShizuruNakatsu ļlol

[@sicksadworld765]

@@ShizuruNakatsu laughs in Count Dooku

[@ShizuruNakatsu]

@@sicksadworld765 He'll have a hard time laughing without a head.

[@CoreYTOfficial]

Do you guys see me in the background

[@CoreYTOfficial]

Btw I’m corey

[@DangLao06]

Yep

[@tobymaeganleavendusky299]

Hi Corey!

[@simonhicks5973]

CoreYT hi Corey

[@kyle-iu8cp]

hi corey

[@ence1540]

Girls: Boys never truly love something Boys: Hold my Star Destroyers

[@Zeqweery]

Reminds me of this one image I saw where a man is in bed with his star destroyer and his wife/gf is on the floor.

[@smokingjaycutler6631]

@@Zeqweery what a true chad

[@trishmassingill9197]

Star destroyers are some of the COOLEST spaceships in all of fiction, you cannot change my mind

[@theaidenchicago]

I think they’re really cool! I personally enjoy Venator Star Destroyer more.

[@justaguywithachevy367]

The star destroyers and super star destroyers are the goats

[@Unbrickme]

Honestly the color on the newer model just looks a lot better than the older model.

[@thegreatpiginthesky3904]

The older version looks like that because of sun damage

[@Unbrickme]

@@thegreatpiginthesky3904 I don't think it's because of sun damage Ryan very recently built that

[@Unbrickme]

@Preston Varner Thank you so much

[@Unbrickme]

@Preston Varner I'd recommend buying the UCS Y wing on amazon it's still sold at its original price of $200

[@Unbrickme]

@Preston Varner try one of the rc tracked racers

[@Gamer-lm3lv]

was trying to see a good view of the Gap on a finished one (I am building mine now), so thank you SO much for taking time to review that part.

[@cameronpeterson6734]

I love how much Lego sets have really improved over the years

[@legisnuntius]

A Super Star Destroyer at the same scale would be a little more than 33 feet long.

[@Marguns21]

The ships are like me, grey on the outside but colorful and hollow on the inside xD

[@danbanan9208]

Just bought my own 2019 UCS IISD this weekend. What a blast it is to build! Absolutely magnificent.

[@PenPlays]

I did not realize the secondary engines were identical in shape (parts) between both sets. I really like how LEGO tried to emulate the actual movie set model in size and function with the 2019 set.

[@coilsfrom]

Something to note: 2002 is an Imperial II-class, while 2019 is an Imperial I-class.

[@alperisler89]

wrong both are ISD-1

[@callumpears1523]

The old one's turrets do look like those of an ISD-2 but the bridge tower is definitely for an ISD-1 and both of them are supposed to be the Devastator which was an ISD-1.

[@squib2118]

I think the communication thing with the hinge helps you make either an ISD 1 or 2. The first one has that raised communication thing, while ISD 2 has a flat bar. I don’t think that they can really swivel in Star Wars but I think it just helps you make a 1 or 2

[@lancebreault2686]

The small pod that hyperspeed-rammed both of those ships down the middle sure was powerful.

[@santiagobaby]

They had so much potential for cool interiors in these! Imagine how cool that would be, it’d be the biggest Lego Star Wars interior and you could have soooo much playability

[@thedrewreview9142]

it’s actually extremely simple to take of the other big sections next to the bridge on the 2019. you don’t have to mess with technic at all the just slide in very easy. i was confused why he kept saying it would be hard to do. they are easy to take off, making the model easy to pick up, at its center of gravity.

[@ericklee3490]

playability should go to the 2019 model because you can recreate the scene of the tantive IV being docked where its is literally a gaping hole there on the 2002 model. You also have much more (and more stable) movement of the side cannons on the newer one as opposed to the old one. I always love watching your content and cant wait for the full millennium falcon comparison!

[@remotex8396]

Im about to order the new one and this video is exactly for what i was looking for (so many details explained) thx man

[@LissaBroyles]

I found a complete disassembled 10030 at a yard sale last summer for $15 lol. No box, they had all the parts stuffed in big zip lock bags. Best find of the year.

[@Siciro]

You could have both and just refer to the 2002 version as a different ship in the fleet. And I think the 2019 tantive v looks more accurate.

[@ffjreviews9029]

Do a comparison video between the 2006 Star Destroyer and the 2014 Star Destroyer

[@MandRproductions]

Don’t have the 2014 one yet

[@ffjreviews9029]

MandRproductions oh.........neither do I

[@trevorconnatser6161]

@@MandRproductions the 2014 is a really good pickup, one of my favorites that I personally have 👍

[@jennifergibson627]

@@trevorconnatser6161 stop bragging

[@waffleman8862]

Jennifer Gibson he wasn’t even bragging

[@DanielMcIntyreTheReal12thMan]

I just got the 2019 destroyer last week. Loved the entire build process and it looks so menacing in my room. In terms of carrying, I actually found that removing the entire bridge area (not the bridge itself but all the stuff under it, and then lifting with two hands from the middle white section of the inner skeleton was the best way for me to move it. I wouldn't hold it from the bottom. Great review of both! Next on my list is to rebuild the original 2006 Star Destroyer. And then the Death Star!

[@lostboyaj2868]

Your videos are fantastic, keep up the great work

[@shrek5forbluray408]

Something tells me this is gonna have over a million views one day

[@Thegamingidiot.]

"no swooshabillity" - MandRproductions 2019

[@brianblank5336]

Best comparison I've seen so far!

[@ShizuruNakatsu]

Seeing your sets in the background makes me so jealous. I only have one bedroom to keep my entire collection in, and every time I get a new big ship I have to rearrange the entire room around it. Because of this, and obviously money too, I've missed out on so many amazing UCS sets. I do have a 2019 Star Destroyer on its way here, but I'll likely have no room left at all once I display it.

[@jesse.w2059]

I have the exact same problem.

[@jacobkirby3526]

2019 star destroyer: I have the high ground!

[@dade4846]

Thanos=Inevitable Gap=Inevitable The gap is secretly Thanos.

[@torpas]

Excellent video. I have reasonable share of the parts needed for the 10030 since some time ago and I really want a Star Destroyer, but this video made me think twice about the old one and I will most likely go for the new one.

[@mikehyziak2708]

Very comprehensive video, I loved it!

[@edwarddougherty-youp2051]

I wish lego sets weren't so expensive otherwise i would have everything and be more tempted to buy them

[@johnbean3429]

You should say 'In the design category, the force is strong with this one.'

[@Keese26]

I love the Star Wars music in the background.

[@Azdo123]

I love these videos they are the best good work man

[@anthonylucero1639]

"there is no swooshability"

[@dylane8689]

Take a drink every time he says “toss up” You will not make it to the end.

[@KingClipps]

I was waiting for this video!

[@owensampson8586]

I love your videos keep up the great work👍🏻👍🏻

[@Mark-OutWest]

I don't know how you can do a value comparison. It's completely unrealistic that you can purchase a 2002 edition at $300 or whatever it cost. Lego prices are ridiculous for vintage sets. I admire your disposable income.

[@fredbrockman319]

17:34 The Gap: I am inevitable... On a side note, look at sooo many star destroyer MOCs to realise that you can hide the gap. But I get it would add pieces and raise the price (as if it wasn't high enough), but I reckon they could have tried. At least that would start making the £650 look more tolerable...

[@liam9235]

"Swooshability" 10/10 commentary

[@jasonsnowder6734]

I like how the full size tantiff vi is in the background

[@nope1918]

I like the 2019 version more overall but I prefer the smaller details of the 2002 model (like the asteroid pieces for shield domes, the tires for the engines, etc). The reason why I like that more is because it's obviously made of LEGO bricks no matter what you do, but the 2002 version really feels like a LEGO star destroyer because of those odd parts being thrown in and used for things they obviously weren't originally meant for. It find new ways to use old parts and I really like that aesthetic, that's how LEGO should be imo. Or maybe I'm the weird one. I haven't really been "into" LEGO for 15 years now, but back when I played with them the list of bricks was pretty small. They added new pieces here and there, of course, but for the most part new pieces only came out if they really didn't have anything that could be repurposed. And I think that was the real fun of LEGO, not just building the sets but getting new sets and being all "Oh, I never thought of using X piece as a Y instead!" and then taking it apart, adding it to my already existing collection and coming up with something completely new. The aesthetic of the 2002 star destroyer really appeals to that sense of creativity and imagination. I feel like the 2019 one, on the other hand, appeals more to the second type of LEGO enthusiast: The kind who builds a set and then just... displays it. They put it together and that's that, as if it were a model that wasn't meant to ever come apart again. Which is a fine hobby to have, but I feel like that really misses the point of LEGO. The 2019 star destroyer looks more accurate, and at the same time I feel like that makes it look more boring. I do have to give the 2019 version credit for using the door pieces in the "communications radar" though, that's pretty neat.

[@jennifergibson627]

LLLOOOONNGGGGGEEESSSSSSTTTTT CCCOOOMMMMEEENNTTT EEEVVVVEEERRRR

[@NOArtHere1]

Am i the only one who likes imperial officers Just asking

[@ninjabricz7688]

They're cool but if they replaced one with Darth Vader it would be better

[@purefire5172]

The figures are good, but it's a UCS set. We either need better figures or more of those figures.

[@rex555s6]

The airm printing is nice

[@callumpears1523]

I absolutely love them. I've been waiting years for a lieutenant figure (up until 2012 they were all captains). Still, I agree that a few more figures would have been nice. Vader, maybe Leia, and a stormtrooper/navy trooper would have really helped to increase the value.

[@theflamingcookie6480]

Good for mocs :/

[@machamlin1595]

The 2002 sheild generators are misaligned!! 😂😂 I just watched your vlog and had to come see for myself lol

[@HGSRR]

"Star destroyers are big gray triangles," Ryan, I could not agree more.

[@markbotros7508]

Darth Vader definitely should have been in the set. It is HIS Star Destroyer.

[@benroth1102]

I am getting the 2019 version for my graduation present.

[@thex2thaz]

Nostalgia overload, thank you for comparing the two side by side. I thought they were the same but now see they’re very different. I was 11 when my crazy dad bought the 2002 version during 2006. Finally finished after like 3 days. Tried to move it and it just exploded. Ended up super gluing it back together.. what a mess. The Star Destroyer II was a lot better design wise.

[@JakeMMC]

Aww I miss going on my mom's phone and binge watching Lego animations for hours in my room. The good days...

[@michaelbaptist7694]

Good observation. 12 lbs isn't a ton. 2000 lbs is.

[@michaelbaptist7694]

@@nathanharris6450 whoops

[@matthewsmith2595]

I love the new model! It's a shame its bigger than my appartment tho...

[@jamesallmon7756]

Is your apartment a cardboard box?

[@matthewsmith2595]

@@jamesallmon7756 no I was making a joke

[@ShizuruNakatsu]

I live at home, have one bedroom to work with, and already have Lego Star Wars sets on every shelf on every wall of my room. Yet I ordered this anyway and it will be here in a few days...

[@InfernalBricks-Master-Jedi]

In my opinion both sets are very similar but the new set is just so much stronger and has way more detail. Great video 😀👍

[@permafrostinsanity1799]

On the newer version, at 18:36, that small bay is actually an Officers docking bay. It's ment for officers, VIPs and the dark lord himself. Fun fact...

[@Dylank001]

We want a droid control ship set!

[@Eyedonutno]

I feel like some people got mad that he said Star Destroyers were triangles.

[@pizzatimestops4544]

Yeah doesn't he know it's shape is a CIRCLE, smh. Ryan needs some glasses

[@Eyedonutno]

@@pizzatimestops4544, clearly.

[@the1andonlyjawa]

Loved the Corey cameo!!!

[@jamesyarar7514]

Imagine being that kid , seeing all that Lego around you… it’d make you go into a frenzy.

[@TheShinyDude]

The 2002 Tantive looks like the one from the Original Trilogy Videogame so it automatically wins

[@Baron_]

At first glance It honestly looks like someone split the destroyer in half

[@merafirewing6591]

I saw this Star Destroyer in half!

[@andreylyutikov8348]

Another Holdo maneuver

[@kiki8556]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

[@henrywarmoth1792]

Fun fact, according to the rogue squadron games, that dome on the bottom behind the hangar bay is the third shield generator. 😁👍

[@Sword-Breaker]

I have the 2002, post build, I wound up adding about 2500 additional pieces to reinforce and add greeble/finish. Out of the box, the frame tends to split and warp, unless you add more braces. The docking bay is just a hole. There's no reactor bulge underneath. The interior was SCREAMING for at least a diorama. If they want me to shell out an extra 400 bucks for the new one, they'd have to do a lot better.

[@ImpaledBerry]

I cant wait *(STAR WARS THE RISE OF SKYWALKER SPOILERS)* ok, last warning. the star destroyer with the planet destroyer at the bottom

[@preeminent7854]

Leah dies , palpatine is alive , rey is related to palpatine, ben turns good last sec and dies for rey

[@clxtch._.8062]

Rey gets a yellow saber

[@preeminent7854]

Lego In A Suit iss a coo movie iss juss a bad way to end a saga

[@itsyukiko8483]

And luke redeems himself and catches the lightsaber he throws in the list jedi after rey threw it

[@McDALN]

Imagine how they would look if they remake these ucs sets in 10-15 years from now.

[@kq1534]

Noah Maldonado hopefully they do because the UCS SSD is pretty overrated and bad as a UCS set because LEGO didn’t even bother to do detail on the bottom side of the ship and decided to make it completely flat for a half-assed interior

[@davidcarmona1741]

It will fly

[@galadato7425]

Probably will be in minifig scale

[@nukman6969]

It would either be mini fig scale or it would be a inch long

[@Stormy-cj6oi]

@@galadato7425 It would have to be around 25 meters or 84 feet

[@lechse4648]

The communication radar thing is actually the tractor beam targeting

[@mickeyssmokehouse8548]

A fine addition to my collection

[@geniusatwork12]

My mom won't let me buy another big Lego like that after I secretly bought the UCS Falcon XD She said one is enough :3

[@feztoys]

Growing up my parents wouldn't even buy me a $10 Lego lol I had 0 Lego products growing up. Now I'm 28 have my own money and spend $2000 at the Lego store within 2 months lol I got my first Lego set at like 24 years old lpl

[@geniusatwork12]

@@feztoys Hey man better late then never. When I have my own place you bet I'll make room for all those sets

[@feztoys]

@@geniusatwork12 Yeah man, I just bought a brand new home last year and have a room where I still start putting my collections. Room is empty right now but little by little it will take shape.

[@VulturePilot]

I just can’t justify dropping that much money on that but good video

[@_Shay_]

VulturePilot same, The UCS falcon can be justified. This tho eehhh

[@kq1534]

Justify is subjective but I can guarantee this, if you ever buy it and build it, you won’t regret the purchase

[@gerbaited4229]

MandR: "It's just kinda stuck in there" Me: "Thats what she said"

[@NotEnoughAlpacas]

I'm planning to get the 2019 in the next week or two so I've got it before it gets retired, issue is going to be finding a spot in my room to display. Especially since the UCS Falcon is taking up a bit of space.

[@kadeklassen1995]

Should have had a category for price

[@ronin3825]

The lack of color hurts my eyes

[@XTeam49]

I have looked at it for a long time and I wanted to buy 1 last Lego set before I’ll stop buying it for me, 1 last time to be a child again. You were the last straw, and I will buy it tomorrow. Thank you!

[@euanmorris7835]

The star destroyer is an imperial 1 class, however, like the actual devastator( which participated at the battle of endor) the top can be flipped as mentioned in the video so it becomes an imperial 2 class, just like the devastator when it was converted

[@moproodu]

wish it had mini hammerhead corvette.

[@JakobeR6]

What’s Corey’s channel?

[@Nomad6763]

I never realized this until this video but swooshability is probably my number one metric for a lego set

[@jamesloehr641]

I hope they remake the ssd too. The current one looks good, buts its small for such a epic ship. A remake with like 8k pieces would be amazing. Make that bad boy 6 foot long.