LENS TEST | Sony 35mm 1.8 OSS vs Sigma 30mm 1.4 DC DN Lens Comparison

[@ozkeefe1392]

This is an awesome review/comparison! I've been debating wether to get the Sony or Sigma for a while now and the only thing tipping me over to the Sony was the OSS but now that I got a Gimbal I'm gonna go with the Sigma. It definitely yields a better picture in my opinion!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Thank you very much! Yeah, with a gimbal the Sigma 30mm is a no brainer! Congrats on your purchase! Keep shooting!

[@ozkeefe1392]

Thank you! This is by far the best comparison video I've seen so far btw. Really glad I found it!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Cheers! Thanks so much!

[@schatzor]

Hey. just want to say that I was in the same thoughts as you and I went for sigma. I also use the gimbal and sigma lens is one of them sharpest lenses I have.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

That's great! Which gimbal did you get? Sigma lenses are solid!

[@FitofnietOfficial]

I can tell from my own experience that the sony 35mm is a must have for videography! Using this lens every time in my new projects.

[@The22Century]

Started to watch... and THANKS GOD! No "what's up everybody" at the beginning, no pointless watery bla-bla and technical stuff. Finally cutting straight to the chase. Thank you for saving my time.

[@collinausbury]

It's always difficult. I love the slightly warmer and "better" imagine from the sigma, but the Sony glass just works better with the Sony body. The autofocus with the Sony doesn't hunt as much as it does with the sigma, and the extra OSS pulls through as a security against jitters. Thank you so much for the review.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Pros and cons for both, haha.Thanks for watching!

[@HectorRiveraPhotography]

but the signs is better color rendition and sharper so sigma for me !! shake and jitter gimbal fox and done

[@Featinwe]

There is one more thing for Sony lens - it's smaller. I went to E-mount for size and weight so it's quite important for me. If someone doesn't care about size Sigma is a clear choice. You didn't mention about CA - Sony can produce quite massive CA is contrast situation (purple fringing) while Sigma does a much better job.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Yep, great points!

[@rohanrawal3949]

Extra weightis also helpful for steady shots while using it on rig or gimbal, so sigma helps that way too

[@louierussel9678]

@@rohanrawal3949 Im torn between what to choose in my glide shots the only thing lacks the sigma is the OSS, does the weight of sigma help to get more stabilize shots in my gimbal ? or it doesnt matter , I think the oss is a big help but sigma is much more cheap arrrggh i cant chooose :(

[@KoelAnderson]

Sony

[@stephencreates2764]

Louie Russel Films this is what in wondering did you ever get the glass and which one?

[@ClaudioDesideriFilms]

Thanks Sid, even after 3 years this comparison is so useful!

[@fr3ak1shh]

Still useful 3 years after 3 years :)

[@Richardsumilang]

Was I the only one who noticed all that extra shake in the Sigma lens?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Richard Sumilang You're totally right, the Sigma will have a slight shake since it's not a lens with image stabilizer

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Richard Sumilang Yeah

[@yeonchool]

it is a6500 stabilization issue,

[@Getzairdeosio]

I juts did a comment about that... apparently is not just that lens... my 19 2.8 does the same while in movement in autofocus and my sony lenses don't

[@ReggieWard]

Upgrade to the latest firmware for the A6500 per Sony it improves this issue. Sony A6500 Firmware v.1.03 Supports new lens “SEL100400GM” [FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS] Optimizes image stabilization performance in movie mode

[@jmackultra]

I think I'll rock with the Sony because of the OSS because I can't see too big of a difference in video quality. When you place them side by side I can tell they're different but they both look pretty good 👌. I'll have to try watching on a larger screen to see if I change my mind.

[@DelReiRock]

The Sigma 30mm got a new firmware in Fev/2018 that upgraded the Manual Focus adjustment. I liked better now than before.

[@Curtis-Randall]

Thanks for the video. It was nice to see a comparison. I honestly couldn’t tell the difference between the lenses as far as image quality goes. Great stuff!

[@faizfesse9906]

i think sony better for video and sigma good for photo..

[@tg.tarungarg]

Sigma was continuously jittering while touch screen test...

[@mrlowcarsales]

i thought so

[@tonyhoang5784]

Great video. I personally went with the Sony due to the focus performance.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Tony Hoang That's great! Yeah, the Sony AF is really solid!

[@alexandriaoccasional-corte1346]

"It's a close call but Sigma is a clear winner" LOL not so close after all...

[@godofhope]

I bought first the 35mm f1.8. Then I heard of the Sigmas. I bought the 16mm. It delivered 1/5 of the images completely missfocussed images. Until f4 the lens is soft at the sides. So probably I’m not going to try another lens of this series. I have the Sigma 150-600mm and there it seems I was lucky to get a properly sharp copy.

[@aimonadam7148]

I’d definitely recommend sigma 30mm f1.4 over Sony 35, it’s more convenient and better in price, sigma is my choice for what I would prefer to myself. And thank you for your reviewing. Helpful and clear

[@mpikas]

It seems like if you're just shooting pics or mostly pics, get the Sigma, otherwise, it's not that easy. Since I shoot pics and video, reviews like yours are more and more pushing me towards the Sony. What I found interesting is that when everything is perfect then the sigma gets better pics/video, but if you get a little off and the Sony looks better. Since most of us don't have IBS and/or gimbals, I'm surprised the Sigmas are as popular as they are. Again, I get it for photography, but not so much for video, and I get it for the 16mm (the shorter the lens gets the less it matters), but again, for the 30mm I'm not so sure. If money was no object I'd probably get both and then see if I mostly carry one or if I can't do without one. I suspect that without constant side by side comparison I'd end up keeping the sony.

[@FelixLyhs]

i think this is the first lens test/Comparison without unpractcial test methods with charts, rolling shutter etc, really liked this one, you just got a new subscriber :)

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+GamersCanary Thanks man! Yeah, I got sick and tired of those "scientific" tests, and just made my own review that made sense to me, lol. Thanks for the support!

[@RockWILK]

I'm using the Sony lens on my a6400, and it's so awesome, but the Sigma, clearly, is equal parts awesome. I think like with any instrument, it's really more a matter of who's playing that guitar. :-) these are all incredible tools.

[@sitiimanina]

As a guitar player, you said it accurately 😁

[@RockWILK]

@@sitiimanina Amen my friend.

[@ryanroarty691]

I have both with my sony a6300 (which doesn't have any IBIS). I originally bought the sigma because of the better image, but its close to useable due to it turning everything to jittering jelly (and thats with a Zhiyun Crane!). It can really only be used on a tripod without hands. Had to move to the sony due to its OSS for moving shots. Just had to sacrifice 5% image quality.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

There's definitely a way to film with that lens without any jitters! It takes a lot of practice!

[@hoamanh7638]

If you are getting jittering jelly even with a decent gimbal, just git gud then.

[@louierussel9678]

I have an A6000 and a Feiyu AK2000 gimbal , I tried it with the kit lens OSS on and off , and OSS off looks very jittery and that what it looks like on the sigma but i love the sigma , would the sony 35mm be bang for the buck compared to sigma ? :((

[@vitorsilvaus]

Guys, do you think that if you have a gimbal, Sony's OSS is no longer a differentiator?

[@izkytama]

I'll go with sel35 becouse i use it for photo and recording, if u dont like recording go with sigma 30mm

[@CJamesPhoto]

I certainly preferred the Sony, seems to work with the camera better, sure the image quality was slightly better on the sigma, but id prefer something more reliable and it still looks great! Thanks for the video :)

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+CJamesPhoto Thanks for watching!!

[@CJamesPhoto]

Sidney Diongzon Anytime, your content rocks, something id love to achieve on my videos, Im subscribing for sure!

[@mvrfilms]

I prefer the 35mm... IBS/OSS is EVERYTHING when it comes to video especially shots that you want to shoot handheld.

[@LuisBazan]

Man I'm really torn lol. I ended up grabbing the 35mm for OSS but really love the image quality the 30mm has. It's very comparable to the 18-35 which I use a lot.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

It's all about what matters to you the most...performance or image quality. For me, image quality wins at the end of the day.

[@charruaporelmundo]

I understand you wanted to use both at 1.8, but on the last test you should use the sigma at 1.4 not at 1.7 since you use the sony at it max capabilities, sigma shoulded be at it maximun capabilites too,...in my opinion.

[@ShootnoHesitation]

Great video, love that you show a wide range of comparisons and you get straight to the point!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Deepak Sharma Thanks so much!

[@YCImaging]

Hugh Jackman FTW

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+YCImaging Haha, yep!

[@faisalyum]

YCImaging what is FTW?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+M.Faisal Yumarta For The Win :)

[@faisalyum]

Sidney Diongzon thanks:)

[@hiazhar2008]

I immediately clicked on like when I saw the Hugh jackman, love such humour (: And subbed.

[@richardpcrowe]

I shoot with the A6500 which, obviously has IBIS. I purchased the 30mm f/1.4 simply because I found it from a local photographer and got a very good price. I am quite happy with it. Right now I'm shooting with the 12mm f/2 Rokinon; 30mm f/1.4 Sigma; 50mm f.1.8 Sony; and the great Sony 85mm f/1.8. I also have a 16mm f/2.8 Sony which is soon going the way of eBay and a 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Sony zoom which I love for family pix. I'd like a small lens to fit somewhere in between the 12mm and the 30mm and think that the Sigma 19mm f.2.8 might be my choice,,,

[@stanleyhu9063]

That's exactly how you should do product comparison. Well done and nice review!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@johndonaldson5126]

I agree the Sigma looks better. I also liked the way the Sigma did the focus speed test because it seemed to be smoother. I'm disappointed in my Sony 35 1.8 due to lack of sharpness, especially at f1.8.

[@chrisnavich]

Ah looks like you shot at APU! My old stomping grounds. Great review, I’ve got a sigma 30mm on the way, now am super excited 🙌🏽

[@emmanuelnguyen3361]

I was debating whether to get the sony 50mm 1.8 vs SIGMA 30 mm 1.4, and at the end of the day. I GOT THE 30 mm 1.4 for my a6400! its amazing! itsespecially for the price!!! Autofocus was still good on my camera. 50 mm 1.8 i feel like its too close... espeically for my crop sensor camera. Upgraded the firmware on the sigma lens... and manual focus is amazing!! For those aiming to buy a good lens under $350 and has a good aperture! In my situation and experiences, It served me well in low light and it has a nice creamy bokeh to it too. I personally use it for portaits and even landscape at times( although a wider angle lens is much preferable) I use this to VLOG sometimes!! HOWEVER those who are buying to buy this for a vlog type , I suggest going for the 16 mm f1.4! the 30 mm 1.4 is a bit too close! (45 mm on my a6400) but other than that! Im very impressed!!

[@DKRacket]

LOL. I have been on the same path but didn't make a decision yet whether I should go for the a6500 or a6400. I really love the Sigma 30mm 1.4 and my worry is how it will perform in low light situations.

[@emmanuelnguyen3361]

@@DKRacketIt just really depends on you! If your on a strict budget... I would still consider the a6400 (although it has NO IBIS). I bought mine for $898(US DOLLARS) body only. Tbh the a6500 and a6400 are essentially the same. I used both, but my a6500 broke a few months ago. (fell off a cliff LOL) I'll tell you my exeperience from replacing my broken a6500 to the a6400. So basically imo the a6400 is like the "improved version" of a6500 hahaha A6400 perks over the a6500: *faster autofocus and more accurate than the a7 series for autofocus *uses the newer processor chip *still has the slog profiles as a6300 and a6500 *NO MORE LIMIT on the 30 min 4k recording. I can record till my battery dies XDD (a6300 and a6500 has a limit) *and no more screen dimming when i shoot in 4k(a6500 when u shoot in 4k, the screen dims... which annoyed me) and the sigma 30 mm 1.4 in my case and in my opinion had really great low light performance. Don't expect the lens to be night vision beast xDD but overall at 1.4 i was able to get some good photos without boosting up my ISO. For $330-$350, I would defo buy this lens. Overall both cameras are great. I do miss IBIS, but im happy I was able to replace my BROKEN a6500 with the a6400. HOWEVER if I still have my a6500, i would not buy the a6400. Its basically the same features, except Sony took the problems of the a6500 and solved it in the a6400 :) I hope this helps. and whatever camera you choose, they are both good!

[@Escuchalabrisa]

The Sony a6500 has a firmware update relationed with the IBIS in video, after this video test. I would to know if exists any differemt right now.

[@aleksanderjohan91]

Awesome review, and love the fact that you take it down to real-life use of the lenses 👌🏼

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Aleksander Larsen Thanks! Glad this was helpful!

[@Sudeshnasworld_]

How will the combination of Sony a6500 + sigma 30mm f 1.4 perform for photography and videography??and whether the f stop value changes when keeping on autofocus for videography?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

That's my favorite combo! Check out my "FILM JOURNALS" and "BEST Settings for the Sony a6500" to see some footage and see the settings I use!

[@Sudeshnasworld_]

Sidney Diongzon Thanks a lot..

[@spiralotus3606]

Portrait of Hugh Jackman? I'm dying! :)

[@SidneyDiongzon]

LOL, yep! He's a reoccurring character throughout my videos, haha

[@gengszterpingvin1275]

Baby Channing Tatum.... but good comparison. Grat.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

LOL!

[@ianlloyd7723]

Enjoyed this review Sidney, thanks. I had to watch again on my iMac 5k to see the slight image quality difference. I shoot on an A6400 and have the Sony 35, very happy with it. I did notice the jitter on the sigma and also a little focus breathing that wasn’t on the Sony lens. The real low light test is very good, shows the power and flexibility in modern camera tech to adapt with little impact on IQ. Nice job.

[@HectorRiveraPhotography]

sigma all day better picture image better 1.4 sharper for that all day everyday

[@starmanx25]

AMAZING video. Thank you so much! I feel like the Sigma has a tiny bit better color production?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

I agree!!

[@kopan14]

SEL 35mm offers greater AF and stabilization It would be great if you have testing and comparison among Sony Zeiss 24mm f1.8 versus other wide-angle lens or similar prime lens.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Yeah, the Sony 35mm is a great performer. I wish I had the Zeiss 24mm to compare!

[@himalayan_stroller]

Sidney Sir, thanks for making this video. You vanished so many doubts. I am going to buy Sigma 30mm for my a6500. It is sharper. Thanks again!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Saun Wild Glad this video was helpful!

[@Zombie_Bae]

Thanks for helping me decide which lens to get. Auto focus means nothing if the picture is not crisp. Good pictures is what the client wants.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

I’m glad this was helpful!!

[@David81884]

Thanks for another great video...For the a6500 in which OSS is not an issue, which one offers better image quality...? Thanks for your time

[@directedbydeez]

This was an EXCELLENT review bro, thanks so much. And wow that ISO test made me remember why I'm getting the 6500 in the first place, currently I'm shooting on a Canon 70D and my video becomes massively fuzzy at anything at or above 800 ( and that's in great lighting). Looking to pick up the 6500 to be able to add some flair to my videos and get crisp low light shots. I was thinking for my first 2 lenses I would go sigma 30 f1.4 and the Sony 50mm (the silver one). Any other recommendations?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

THANKS SO MUCH!!! Yeah, the low light on the a6500 was surprisingly good, considering it's APS-C camera! As far as lenses go, I'd also recommend the Sony 85mm 1.8 OSS. It's soooooooooooo good and produces the best bokeh of any Sony lens I've tried so far. Hope this helps!

[@ImmortalJeremy]

A good all around daytime lens is the 18-105 F4 E PZ lens by Sony. I’m gonna get that one to pad out my zoom levels for when I need something other than 30 or 35mm ( don’t know which one yet!)

[@genkinosomi1912]

Este video es simple, contundente y honesto. Te felicito, porque aquí hablas de lo REALMENTE IMPORTANTE en un lente y no de las estupideces técnicas, que a la mayoría de la gente no nos importan. El autoenfoque, la calidad del video, la estabilizacion, eso es lo más importante en un lente, de eso debería hablarse más. Excelente!!, solo que a mi parecer, gana el Sony

[@paulineisabel0]

The comparisons here are mainly on shooting video, but I definitely wanna get one that'll be good for photo. The sigma lens does tend to have warmer tones than the Sony lens and would work quite well for photos -- just wanted to get more of your advice in this regard.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Pauline Macapagal If its photography you're looking for, then I would highly recommend the Sigma 30mm. It's simply a sharper lens!

[@paulineisabel0]

Thank you for the quick response!

[@cjmadridtv4289]

Pinay?

[@jakubs.6817]

Actually it's an excellent review. I'm watching it now for the 3rd time maybe (not at once) and finally I see that I'm going more into the Sony if to buy for a6500.. The image looks actually much more stable and doesn't jitter so much, also the autofocus is better cause on sigma I see this little reverse focus after focusing. But damn.. Sigma looks soo much better, need to try them in real life, cause I guess Sigma can be much more comfortable to hold camera and take still photographs

[@shadda]

I have the 35mm sony but I want the sigma. I just can't justify getting the 30mm when I already have the 35mm. It's so damned frustrating.

[@TravellLove]

I mean there is not whole a lot of difference. Plus you get OSS in Sony!

[@TravellLove]

Plus Sony is so compact and travel friendly

[@OmiAzad]

Hi, is there any way I can ignore the lens OSS and use the IBIS only? If you know please share with us.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Omi Azad Unless the lens has a button to turn it off, then I don't think so.

[@AustinRoss]

I know I'm late coming to this video, but honestly I think the Sony is the better winner here. OSS is going to make the difference in low light and color correction can be accomplished in Lightroom if the shot actually matters. You can't correct camera shake in LR. Once that sharpness is lost, it's gone.

[@vitorsilvaus]

good point!

[@ChrisParayno]

I'll stick with the Sony just because of the OSS. Yes I know it's not gimbal steady, but I naturally don't have steady hands and do mostly video work. I rather have the annoying micro-jitteres subdued rather than deal with it in post.

[@andrem2976]

Sharpness is great but when the sigma hunts it can be frustrating in the moment of a great video shot...this is a deal breaker not to mention slower AF and maybe a little bit more effort with in post sharpening and color grading can make up for the softer sony. OSS also works a tad better with sony on the 6500. Decisions, decisions...But great review as always Sidney! :)

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Andre M Thanks man! My Sigma copy seems to work perfectly fine and on par with my Sony lens.

[@andrem2976]

Sidney Diongzon The sigma really is a beauty though! All in all my biggest regret was buying it for the A6300 without the OSS and expecting to get by for video but I'm upgrading to the 6500 in a couple months. I'm sure it'll be even more awesome come that time!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Andre M Yeah, the a6500 is really helpful to smooth out your footage. Excited for your upgrade!!

[@johndonaldson5126]

Right. I'm currently bidding on an a6500 with the Sony 35/1.8 on eBay. Most of all I want the better focusing capability. To me the image quality differences were not obvious. I also like the smaller Sony. I did notice the Sigma breathing a few times.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

I hope you get it!

[@Spagatti_Monkey]

Hi, On which camera you are reviewing these lenses ?

[@PUEBLOVISTA]

Really great test video. Detailed and to the point! Will be getting my Sigma tomorrow.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+PUEBLO VISTA That's awesome! Congrats!

[@clintoncornwell]

Great test video. I had a hard time telling the difference between the two when it comes to image quality. What things were you looking at that made you say the Sigma is clearly better?

[@AdonaiMan]

i have a A6300 and i'm gonna work filming weddings, birthdays, night clubs, all low light enviroments. So, which it's better? this lenses.. or the sony 35mm 1.8 OSS? i really like the AF speed on the Sony lenses but they are more expensive. which one do i get?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Daniel Salazar For low light, the Sigma 30mm for sure! And it performs just as fast as sony lenses! (Maybe just a hair Soler)

[@ImmortalJeremy]

I’ve heard the sigma lens auto focus is noisy. Can you attest to that one way or the other vs the Sony lens? Since I do a lot of weddings, I’ll mostly have a mic on the camera or on a mount near the camera ( handles of a gimbal)

[@SidneyDiongzon]

It’s a little bit noisy, but if you have a mic you won’t hear it

[@ashwinnagpal1973]

One of the reviews said that the sigma 30 mm is not good for close ups as there is significant distortion... Would love to know your take on this ... Thanks and it was a beautiful review!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

I haven’t found that at all

[@ashwinnagpal1973]

@@SidneyDiongzon Ok thanks !

[@TriSutrisnowapu]

I just bought a6500 and 35mm f1.8 few hours ago, can't wait to try it out.. Nice comparation.. My friend own a a6500 + sigma 30 f1.4, so I'm curious about the comparation, and video ia cool man.. Thanks

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Tri Sutrisno You've got a great combo, and you'll have fun filming with it! Thanks for watching man!

[@keremyucel7475]

It seems that this is a handheld test. If you perform the same test with Sigma on a 3 axis gimbal without steadyshot, would you get less shake? Does the gimbal compensate the shake on sigma in 1/50 shutter? What is the best choice in terms of sharpness and focus tracking when using the lens on a gimbal?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Gimbals will always be a better choice, and will make your shot incredibly smooth. As far as the settings go, just with the fastest option.

[@fantazy911]

and in sharpness, what is sharper than Sigma 30mm vs Sigma 18-35mm?

[@imadeagusparamaartha8134]

absolutly sigma 30mm

[@RyoHazuki224]

I know you tried to keep the aperture as close as possible on both to get an apples-to-apples comparison, but how is that Sigma lens when its stopped down to 1.4? They say some primes might not be as sharp at their widest aperture.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+RyoHazuki224 It's definitely sharp at f/1.4. I shoot most my videos at f/1.4

[@AZDesigns22]

I had the sigma 30mm 2.8 just got a deal on the Sony 35 for under 300 bucks hoping it's worth the upgrade!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Sounds like a great deal!

[@chosenideahandle]

It's pretty much a photo-real illustration of Hugh Jackman.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Chosen Idea 😂😂😂

[@brycevaughn8151]

If i have an a6300 would you recommend the sony since I do more handheld video? Or is the shakiness of the sigma manageable?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Bryce Vaughn Go with the Sony! The OSS is very helpful especially on the a6300.

[@brycevaughn8151]

Awesome! Thanks for the quick response man

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Bryce Vaughn Glad I could help!

[@brycevaughn8151]

One last question, I do photo and video so what would you recommend for getting sonys 35mm or 50mm?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Bryce Vaughn Good question! That's really preference. If you like tighter shots, go with the 50mm. If you want a little room to play with, then go with the 35mm. I do find that the 35mm is slightly better in image quality.

[@johnadams9044]

Good and helpful video. I don't know what people would do without these very helpful well presented comparison videos.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Thanks man! Glad it was helpful!

[@atwogun7751]

There's something you forgot to mention. I have an A6500 and bought 2 Sigma lenses (30 and 56) based on yours and others reviews. I've now discovered that when shooting in continuous focus mode in video the sigma lenses produce a very annoying scrambled "chirpy" digital sound which is picked up by the onboard mic. So much so that if you a shooting a quiet scene it pretty much ruins the footage. As soon as I switch to manual it disappears. I can only assume there is a compatibility issue between the Sigma lenses and Sony body that causes this sound. Wish i had known this before spending £700 on the sigma lenses. And BTW I'm not talking about the focus adjusting. It's like a constant scrambled sound as soon as AFC is enabled in video.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Haven’t experienced that. I’ll have to check that out myself. Thanks for bringing it up!

[@atwogun7751]

@@SidneyDiongzon Seriously I tried it 2 hours ago on both my 30 and 56. Set it to video and AFC and put your ear to the camera then playback some footage with earphones in. I'd be interested to know if you get the same because I'm about to sell my sigma lenses on ebay. I only bought them 1 week ago. This guy posted a similar problem: www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4200975 With a link to the issue: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rZ7Gkmulnsmce5I

[@brunokambara]

I really like so much the sigma images but the OSS makes the difference. What do you think? Is it Worth to pay a little more "just" beacuse the stabilization? Thank for the great review!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Well, I personally would choose image quality over image stabilization.

[@buildingsheriff]

Perhaps an unstable image lacks quality in that regard?

[@samspace81]

The intro was incredible.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Haha, thanks man!

[@moroleongto100]

Best review out there

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Haha, thanks!

[@Legendaley]

I'm getting into vlogging with short cinematic clips here and there with the A6300. I was looking for a run and gun lens that can help be with both scenarios. Do you think a 30mm/35mm will give me a wide enough angle for vlogging? It'll definitely help me in video quality and cinematic sequences but I'm just not sure if it'll work out for vlogging.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

It can, but you'll need to have a tripod like the Joby GorillaPod to extend the reach of the camera further than your arm....unless you have really long arms, lol. I'ma actually going to do a review on a new tripod I love for vlogging, so check out for that soon!

[@Legendaley]

looking forward to that review then!

[@tvdlfilms]

But what about when I get a full frame Sony? 🤔 I already have the 50mm f1.8 FE, but want something wider with nice bokeh...

[@zuriel13g]

Which would you recommend for my a6300 shooting almost exclusively photos. I've mostly done street photography but have been exploring and trying new things. Going to the mountains, car shows, boudoir, night shots and everything in-between. But all I have is the kit lens and an old 50mm 1.7 I adapted from a Minolta film camera. I'm also looking for a more versatile telephoto lens but I think I'm getting a nice prime first.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Zuriel Guillen Go with the Sigma 30mm 1.4 DC DN lens! It's semi-wide enough for street photography, but you can get great portrait shots when you're close to a subject. It's my favorite lens for the Sony a6000/a6300/a6500!

[@aka.Xavier]

Seriously the best comparison video ever for these lenses, Thank you soo much what do you think about Sigma 30 1.4 vs Sigma18-35 1.8 with MC adapter for videos mostly and photos as well? I heard so much positive feedback about this lens

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Orex Bayn Thanks! Both Sigma lenses are phenomenal! But the the Sigma 18-35mm will give you better image quality because it's an Art lens. The one thing I like about the Sigma 30mm is that it's smaller and lighter, as it's a perfect pair with the Sony a6500. Hope this helps!

[@JohnSmith-bh2tj]

For a6300 owners without ibis, is the sony 35 a better choice? How much sharper is the sigma?

[@JalilovTimur]

John Smith sigma 25-30% sharper

[@antonfsd]

Great comparison! Curious if you think the 35mm with OSS is perhaps a better choice for someone with the a6300 (like me) since it has no in-body stabilization? I do shoot with a gimbal most of the time, but not always...

[@SidneyDiongzon]

I would say so! Having OSS is so helpful!

[@vitorsilvaus]

I was about to go with sigma and considering a future gimbal.... but that comment makes me think again haha@@SidneyDiongzon

[@dbocsan]

I have a5100, for me 35mm is a better choice because of lens oss

[@louierussel9678]

do you have sample footages? :) is the oss same as the kit lens?

[@wevidmedia]

Should I buy an extra sigma 30mm lens if I already have sigma 16mm lens or I should go with a gimbal like zhiyon webbil S at similar price point which I don't have ?

[@TgifchurchCoUk]

On a tripod and live streaming, which one is the best sigma 30mm 1.4 or SONY 35mm 1.8?

[@andrem2976]

Great Comparison!! I don't have a gimbal but I'm torn because the sigma quality looks superior! Is it worth going sigma and taking the loss with lack of stabilization opposed to the Sony?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Thanks! I'd say it's worth trying the Sigma 30mm by itself. If you still feel like you need steadier shots, then get a gimbal! Hope this helps!

[@andrem2976]

Thank you! Big help gonna get the sigma

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Andre M Awesome! Excited for you!

[@patgordon1044]

Hi, How did you get the Sigma to AF. I have been trying to get it to AF on a A6000, and it is no where as fast as in your test.

[@Shyamgfilms]

Hi.. I am looking to buy a prime for my a6300 and is confused between the Sony and sigma. Should I go for the Sony since it has OSS and my body doesn't have any stabilisation? I'll be probably shooting more of cinematic travel / run and gun shoots..

[@SidneyDiongzon]

I'd go with the Sony 35mm 1.8 OSS!

[@Anhkha95]

Great video. But can u give me advise. I have a6300, only for photo, would i choose Sony for Oss or Sigma? Thank you

[@benleong2008]

I am using Sony A6400 (no IBIS) but I have a weebill S gimbal, should i get the sony or the sigma lens? I mostly shoot travel videos and little bit of photography. The Sony is little bit cheaper by 30$ here in Singapore.

[@Triple070007]

To me the Sigma image looks a little more casual-user oriented: Like GoPro footage, it's "pre-graded" a little brighter and more colorful, maybe a bit of sharpness too. But the Sony looks more like professional RAW footage. You could easily add the raised highlights and saturation and contrast later in post. The Sigma seems more likely to blow out bright areas too.

[@VideoUpskill]

Really cool comparison, great for video shooters who don't care about the pixel brick wall tests etc. Really great b-roll too!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Thanks so much! Yeah, I’m more about results than I am theory

[@greesly]

What about the Sony 28mm 2.0? I've heard it's even better than the sigma, what do you think of it?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+greesly Haven't tested that lens out myself yet. Maybe one day!

[@yttean98]

Hi, If I remember correctly(a few years ago now) the Sigma does not have OSS whereas the Sony has can you confirm this? How do you use the OSS on this Sigma lens? On another youtube review(in 2016) the reviewer prefers the Sony because of its focus accuracy on majority of the time whereas your review shows otherwise? From the above differences can we surmise Sigma has upgraded its lens to include OSS and improves its focus accuracy?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

The Sony a6500 provides In-body image stabilization, so I'm able to use any lens to help stabilize my footage. This particular Sigma lens still does not have image stabilization. Hope this clarifies some things!

[@komnothet]

If you can have only one len for a6300 to shoot photo and video will you choose sigma 30mm 1.4?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Probably yeah! That's how I started!

[@komnothet]

@@SidneyDiongzon thanks

[@takaliuang]

Sigma+ gymbal 🔥 Watching this on Dec 2022... thanks for this 'old' video, but very useful 🔥👍

[@nachiketpargaonkar8646]

Between the Sigma 30 mm f/1.4 and Sony 50 mm f/1.8, which should be the beginner prime lens for street photography & portrait/candid photos?

[@DavidZamut]

i got the a6300, doing more handheld videos. do you think i should go with the sony or is it a good idea to go with the sigma? shooting in 120 fps almost all the time. is it a big difference without ibis on? hoping for your answer!:) thanks!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

With the a6300, definitely go with Sony. The OSS is REALLY good! Hope this helps!

[@DavidZamut]

Sidney Diongzon okay then i'll try the sony!! thanks for your answer! and thanks for your help! btw great video! it helps a lot!!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+David Zamut Thanks so much! I hope they do help!

[@jmspeedmedia]

You my friend just got yourself a new subscriber great review man, I'm just waiting for the a7iii to be restock and now pair it with 30m, coming from a Canon rebel and deciding to invest into sony gear. I'm also thinking about 18-105 g lens for events, going to check your channel for reviews. Thanks again.

[@SidneyDiongzon]

THANK YOU!!!!!

[@cformont]

I can't make up my mind I need to see how it does with rolling shutter.. lol. Great video

[@saintwolfvision]

Cool video thanks!!

[@tptrsn]

I like this style of lens review!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+Hammerhaus Kennel Thank you!!

[@ayhancapan]

sigma can be so shaky for my a6000. Better i buy sel 35... thank you for this video...

[@SidneyDiongzon]

Yeah, that sounds like a wise choice!

[@ayhancapan]

Sidney Diongzon thanks

[@scottiebumich]

when you were comparing the IBIS on/off did you ALSO have the OSS turned off? Why was the sony lens smoother with the IBIS turned on? Was it becuase it was ALSO using the OSS of the lens?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

It’s been a while since I made that video so I don’t even remember, sorry!

[@ayhancapan]

Btw, i've bought sigma 30mm f1.4 and i'm happy with it :)

[@IonovMaxim]

Did you use A6500 with SteadyShot on? In this test

[@alejovenegasfilmaker3344]

This video is amazing! Very very cool! Nice explained!

[@a1isonpereira]

That OSS really reduces the micro jitters with IBIS on, it's still quite prominent on the Sigma. I've got really shaky hands so that's a tough decision, especially when I'm shooting handheld. Should be a breeze on a gimbal. I'm switching from a Nikon D750 to Sony so looking in to lenses to acquire along with the A6600.

[@Jasonadinatadentistrytoronto]

I'm trying to decide between the two. I here the sigma is also somewhat louder when focusing. true?

[@SidneyDiongzon]

+416 Dentistry Barely. It's not really noticeable. I definitely don't hear it when I use an on board mic like the Rode VideoMic Pro.

[@Jasonadinatadentistrytoronto]

did you find any autofocusing issues with the sigma? or was it simply a matter of it being slower than the sony? TIA

[@SidneyDiongzon]

In video/movie mode, no autofocusing issues at all. It's like 1/4 second slower than the Sony. In photography mode, however, the Sigma does hunt a little bit especially in low light. Both lenses have their pros and cons, but I still find the Sigma 30mm to give the better results. Hope this helps!