Leo Strauss on Persecution and Esoteric Writing with Michael Millerman

[@NotAnEvilPersian]

Thanks. One cant get enough of Michael Millerman.

[@krewabdiel8253]

i realize I am kind of randomly asking but do anyone know of a good place to stream newly released series online?

[@taylorroberto1309]

@Krew Abdiel i would suggest FlixZone. Just google for it =)

[@markuscason7697]

@Krew Abdiel I would suggest flixzone. You can find it on google :)

[@SeekersofUnity]

Dope convo. Thank you :)

[@Jason-wz8xw]

Keep coming back to this one. Great talk.

[@SlickDissident]

Looking forward to this collaboration. Opening thoughts on German rationalism: I remember the (literal) Faustean pact required a blood contract nodding at Goethe's comand of Civics & Lex Mercatorean Supremacy via plume, THAT long ago.

[@freyrbjornsson6452]

Great project!

[@mostlydead3261]

Strauss notes that Machiavelli dividing The Prince into 26 chapters is a luminous fact for 26 is the numerical value of the Hebrew name of God..

[@CastleClique]

check out “liberation through self knowledge” AKA corporeal fantasy, if you need a Kant or Spinoza lecturer!

[@TheNahrstedt]

Are you going to be archiving these courses?

[@ulyssesodysseus2452]

great stuff

[@TheNahrstedt]

Dope collab

[@hibohaginur9874]

Touching👍

[@soulfuzz368]

Millermans stuff on Dugin is great

[@Renegen1]

What Millerman describes is exactly esoteric writing, no matter how it is labeled.

[@johnsondee4100]

Basically, how do you dissuade those young men who are most susceptible to sympathizing with and being tempted by Nazism from becoming Nazis.

[@anthonycarlino4604]

Punching them duh. Naw bro just make them read Yarvin’s gray mirror 2b one time

[@mostlydead3261]

u tell them to Clean Their Rooms..

[@Adam-hj8ou]

Great video! Also, Millerman looks younger. It’d be great content and very enlightening to witness you two philosophically groyp KantBot.

[@masonkerr8359]

I came in expecting to get a more nuanced take on Strauss. I left with the impression that conservatives are regurgitating the bad-faith critiques of their arguments and saying "but actually it's good". For a less reactionary virtue ethics, I'll look to Macintyre.

[@JOHNSMITH-ve3rq]

moar

[@barneyblimp1498]

Millerman a little out of Murphy’s league...

[@zzzaaayyynnn]

@DesignatedSpoon hahaha

[@Cyberphunkisms]

Not only are we returning to hegel, but we are returning to the ancients!! READ HANNAH ARENDT

[@letdaseinlive]

I don't care for Murphy, but he is right that people most commonly blab on the idea that Strauss is an "esoteric" sinister guy. Then they want to know where Aleistor Crowley has transformed himself into a dagger and is readily hidden in the machiavellian fold between Strauss' own lines in his writings.

[@mostlydead3261]

hi esse delendam.. can u explain what is ur problem with Justin?

[@letdaseinlive]

@@mostlydead3261 His attitude towards thinking is ruinously superficial or journalistic. Also, less importantly, he may be dishonest. For instance, he gave an hour plus interview on Sloterdijk without mentioning the source of the material he was laying out.

[@cheekysteez]

The three reasons a philosopher writes between the lines made me wet.