lesson 5 four step method for stating a research problem and objectives

this video lecture highlights the four-step method in stating a research problem and research objective which is the first step in doing research.

[@JaideVillanueva]

1.It's crucial to base your research on previous studies, theories, or practices as it enhances the credibility and relevance of your study. By doing so, you demonstrate that your work builds upon existing knowledge and addresses areas where information is lacking. For instance, if you're investigating how music influences mood, examining studies on music therapy can illustrate the significance of your research and its alignment with the broader context. 2.In the four-step method, uncovering contradictory findings in research is akin to discovering a misfitting puzzle piece. This process is significant as it allows us to identify knowledge gaps and generate fresh research inquiries. For instance, if one study suggests that running boosts happiness while another indicates yoga as the key, a comparative analysis can determine the true impact of each exercise on mood. This approach propels knowledge advancement by addressing gaps and enhancing research methodologies.

[@CarloVerallo-y5o]

The four-step method is a systematic approach to conducting research that involves identifying a research problem, formulating research objectives, collecting data, and analyzing and interpreting the data. In the context of this method, revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements can be a crucial step in refining research objectives and advancing knowledge in a given field. When inconsistencies or conflicts are identified in the existing literature or data, it raises questions about the validity and reliability of the information. By highlighting these discrepancies, researchers can uncover gaps in knowledge and areas that require further investigation. This process is integral to the formulation of research objectives, as it helps researchers refine and clarify the focus of their study..

[@LeaIdris]

1.) Grounding a research problem in past research,theory or practice ensures that study's foundation is solid and relevant. This step validates the problem's significant and allign the research with established knowledge enhancing credibility and context. 2.) Revealing inconsistencies in the four-step method highlights gaps or contradictions in existing knowledge. This process help formulate precise research objectives by addressing these discrepancies.

[@KathleneParagamac-l2y]

Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice ensures the study's foundation is solid and relevant. This step validates the problem's significance and aligns the research with established knowledge, enhancing credibility and context. For example, a study on educational technology effectiveness should reference previous findings and theoretical frameworks to justify its investigation. 2. Revealing inconsistencies in the four-step method highlights gaps or contradictions in existing knowledge. This process helps formulate precise research objectives by addressing these discrepancies.

[@maricarjanequirante957]

Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing the relevance and credibility of a study. By demonstrating a deep understanding of the topic's context, identifying gaps and inconsistencies, providing a foundation for hypotheses and methods, and enhancing credibility, researchers can set their study up for success. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements is a vital step in the research process. By identifying and addressing these inconsistencies, researchers can refine their research objectives, advance our understanding of a topic, and improve methodology. This step is essential for advancing knowledge in a given field and ultimately contributing to meaningful practical applications.

[@reaycalina]

Grounding a research problem in past research is a must in expressing the base statement for a grounded theory is a strong and inductive research method for discovering new theories. It allows the data collected to be a guide of the analysis and theory creation, leading to novel discoveries. It contributes to the overall credibility by establishing trustworthiness in the qualitative research. It employ various strategies to enhance credibility. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the context of the four-step method is significant as it demonstrates the existence of a problem that needs to be addressed. It means their is a need for further investigation to resolve the problem.

[@Berna-ds1jf]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice ensures its relevance and credibility by building on established knowledge and identifying gaps. This context strengthens the study's foundation and justifies its significance. For example, researching new methods for teaching reading might build on existing theories of literacy development, demonstrating how the new approach could address limitations in current methods and contribute meaningfully to educational practice. 2. Revealing inconsistencies or conflicts during the research process helps refine research objectives by highlighting areas needing further exploration or clarification. This step is crucial for advancing knowledge, as it directs attention to unresolved issues or gaps. For instance, conflicting findings on a drug's effectiveness might lead to research objectives focused on understanding the underlying causes of these discrepancies, thus contributing to more accurate and reliable scientific understanding.

[@JovieSelim-v7z]

===Grounding a research problem in existing knowledge is crucial for establishing its significance and relevance. This process reveals knowledge gaps, provides context, and builds credibility. For example, a study investigating the effectiveness of a new teaching method needs to be grounded in existing research on reading instruction, relevant theories of learning, and the practical needs of students. By demonstrating its connection to existing knowledge, the study establishes its credibility and relevance within the field. ==The four-step method highlights the importance of identifying inconsistencies in existing research. These inconsistencies reveal gaps in knowledge, leading to specific research objectives that address these gaps. For example, conflicting findings on the impact of different social media platforms on body image could lead to a study clarifying the relationship between specific platforms and self-esteem. By addressing inconsistencies in existing research, I as a researcher aim to advance knowledge and generate new insights.

[@sheenajeanbernados4879]

1. Discuss the importance of grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice when expressing the base statement. How does this step contribute to the overall credibility and relevance of the study? Provide examples to illustrate your points. Answer: Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial as it. Establishes Context and Background: Provides a foundation by situating the research within the existing body of knowledge, helping to understand its significance. This grounding makes the research more compelling, credible, and impactful. Example: A study on climate change impacts on agriculture might build on previous research showing trends in temperature and precipitation changes, highlighting a gap in understanding specific crop responses. 2. Explain the process and significance of revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the context of the four-step method. How do these inconsistencies help in formulating research objectives, and why is it crucial for advancing knowledge in a given field? Use specific examples to support your discussion. Answer: Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements is essential in the four-step method because it helps to identify gaps, refine objectives, and advance knowledge. By examining these conflicts, researchers can formulate specific, targeted research objectives aimed at resolving discrepancies and providing clearer insights. Example: Given the conflicting results on remote work productivity, a new study might aim to identify variables (e.g., industry, job type, management style) that influence these outcomes.

[@TradingMadison]

It's important in order to make our research trustworthy and important, we need to use what others have studied before us. This helps our study seem reliable and important, 2. Finding different or conflicting information in research helps us see what we don't know yet. By addressing out these differences, researchers can set clear goals for their research and learn more.

[@cherryannbunot2591]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for credibility and relevance. By building on existing knowledge, the base statement becomes more robust and informed. For instance, a study on the impact of social media on mental health can reference previous research to establish a solid foundation. This step enhances the study's credibility by showing that it is informed by established theories and findings, making it more relevant and trustworthy to the academic community. 2. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the four-step method is significant for formulating research objectives. By identifying these contradictions, researchers can pinpoint gaps in knowledge and refine the research focus. For example, in a study on the effectiveness of a new teaching method, conflicting findings from previous studies can guide researchers to investigate specific factors that influence outcomes. Addressing inconsistencies in this way advances knowledge by driving the research towards clarifying uncertainties and building on existing understanding in the field. Cherry Ann Bunot BSBA 3

[@rowenacarcuevasvlog9396]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing credibility, providing a theoretical framework, and demonstrating practical relevance. By building on existing knowledge and showing how the study fits into the larger academic landscape, researchers can enhance the overall quality and impact of their research. 2. revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the research process is vital for formulating research objectives and advancing knowledge in a given field. By addressing these discrepancies, researchers can set clear research goals, contribute to the existing body of knowledge, and drive progress in their area of study.

[@daisybangkiao4055]

A well-defined research problem serves as the cornerstone of any scholarly investigation. Grounding this problem in existing research, theory, or practice is paramount to establishing its credibility and relevance within the broader academic discourse. This step ensures that the study is not merely a random inquiry but rather a meaningful contribution to the existing body of knowledge. Grounding a research problem in existing knowledge is essential for establishing its credibility, relevance, and potential for contributing to the advancement of knowledge. By identifying and addressing inconsistencies, researchers can refine existing theories, challenge established assumptions, and contribute to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the world around us. This process ensures that research is not merely a collection of isolated studies but rather a dynamic and ongoing conversation that builds upon and refines our understanding of complex phenomena.

[@christine_maeabrasaldo2562]

1.A well-defined research problem is the cornerstone of any successful study. It serves as a guiding star, directing the research process and ensuring that the findings are meaningful and impactful. One crucial aspect of formulating a strong research problem is grounding it in existing knowledge, whether it be past research, established theories, or relevant practices. 2.The four-step method, a common framework for research, emphasizes the importance of identifying inconsistencies or conflicts within existing knowledge. This step is crucial for formulating meaningful research objectives and propelling the advancement of knowledge in a given field. Example Education: Research on the effectiveness of different teaching methods for improving student engagement might reveal contradictory findings. Some studies might show that project-based learning is more effective, while others might favor traditional lecture-based approaches.

[@AngieMaeDigal]

1.Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing the credibility and relevance of a study. This step demonstrates that the research is not conducted in isolation but builds upon existing knowledge, contributing to the advancement of the field. By citing relevant past research, theories, or practical experiences, researchers show that they have a thorough understanding of the topic and the existing literature. This familiarity with the field builds credibility and assures readers that the study is grounded in solid knowledge. 2.Revealing inconsistencies or conflicting statements within the existing literature is a crucial step in the four-step method for formulating research questions. This process helps identify gaps in knowledge and provides a foundation for formulating research objectives that can contribute to the advancement of knowledge in a given field.

[@DinaRose-xb5uf]

Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice enhances the credibility and relevance of the study by building on existing knowledge, establishing context, demonstrating rigor, and enhancing credibility. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the context of the four-step method helps in formulating research objectives by identifying research gaps, refining objectives, inspiring new hypotheses, and advancing knowledge in the field. By incorporating these steps into the research process, researchers can conduct studies that are informed, rigorous, and contribute meaningfully to the scholarly conversation.

[@RissamayVailoces-g2j]

1. Grounding a Research Problem in Past Research, Theory, or Practice Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing the study's relevance, credibility, and significance. It provides a strong foundation for the research by demonstrating that the researcher is knowledgeable about the existing body of work and is building upon previous findings. 2. Revealing Inconsistent or Conflicting Statements in the Four-Step Method Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements is a crucial step in the research process, particularly during the problem formulation stage. Identifying these discrepancies helps to clarify the research problem, formulate focused research objectives, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field.

[@CarlMarkJaralve-i6r]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing the credibility and relevance of a study. It demonstrates that the research is not conducted in isolation but builds upon a foundation of existing knowledge, contributing to a larger body of scholarship.

[@MarkLloyedJrDangase-c8n]

A well-grounded research problem is essential for a credible and relevant study. By connecting the research question to existing literature and established concepts, researchers demonstrate their awareness of the field's current state of knowledge, avoiding redundant research and addressing gaps in existing knowledge. Grounding also provides a framework for understanding the significance of the study and its practical implications. Identifying inconsistencies or conflicting statements in the literature is crucial for advancing knowledge. By critically analyzing existing research and pinpointing areas of disagreement or uncertainty, researchers can identify the need for further investigation and clarify the existing understanding. These inconsistencies serve as starting points for formulating research objectives, guiding the direction of the study and its potential contribution to the field.

[@FlorelynAtig]

Grounding a research problem in past research, theory or practice is essential for establishing its credibility and relevance . This step ensures that your study builds upon existing knowledge addresses gaps in understanding , and contribute to the advancement of the field . Additionally ,revealing and addressing incosistin existing literature can be a power tool for advancing knowledge.

[@KenBuco-w4w]

Ken Buco English 3 1.Grounding your research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial because it shows your study's connection to existing knowledge. This helps establish credibility by demonstrating that your research is based on a solid foundation of prior work. For instance, if you're investigating the effects of exercise on mental health, referencing previous studies on physical activity and well-being provides context and legitimacy to your study. It also enhances relevance by highlighting gaps or areas where more investigation is needed, guiding your research towards meaningful contributions to the field. 2.Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in research helps refine research objectives by pinpointing areas needing clarification or further exploration. For example, conflicting findings on the effectiveness of a new therapy method may lead researchers to investigate factors like patient demographics or treatment protocols that influence outcomes. Resolving these inconsistencies is crucial for advancing knowledge because it improves understanding of complex issues and guides future research towards more accurate and reliable conclusions, benefiting both theory development and practical applications in the field.

[@LeaRoseFrancisco-r2j]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is a crucial step in establishing its credibility and relevance. It provides a foundation for the study, ensuring that it is informed by existing knowledge, addresses a significant gap in the field, and has the potential to make a meaningful contribution. By taking this step, researchers can increase the impact of their work and advance the understanding of the topics they investigate. 2. Revealing inconsistencies in existing knowledge is a vital step in the research process. It allows researchers to identify gaps, challenge assumptions, stimulate new research, and ultimately advance knowledge in a given field. By embracing the process of problematization, researchers can contribute to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of complex topics, leading to more informed decision-making and effective solutions to real-world problems.

[@mirabelbongcales3930]

1. Inserting a research problem into the context of prior research, theory, or practice is the main practice that helps to ensure the study’s validity. It shows that your research is relevant, contributes to progressively expand the theoretical base of the field. For instance, a research question which evaluates the outcome of a new teaching technique should, in the literature review section, look at previous literature on teaching strategies and pinpoint which gaps or questions the proposed study will seek to fill. This means there will not be any duplication of research efforts and therefore the research will be very productive in its contribution to the existing literature. Moreover, by anchoring a given research problem in a practical context, it is possible to ensure that the proposed problem is really significant for the exploitation of practice and has a real potential to contribute to the elaboration of actual solutions. 2. The first step in the four-step method is related to the discovery of contradictions in current research, theory, or practice. It brings out areas where more information is needed as well as inconsistency that need to be explained in other papers. Thus, by disclosing such discrepancies, it is possible for researchers to define research objectives that will help to sort out the contradictions and contribute towards the further development of knowledge in the specified area. For instance, if a study regarding a particular treatment yields contradicting findings, a fresh study can be embarked in order to establish why the findings are differing from those of other studies and hence determine the right strategy. This approach helps in avoiding the situation whereby the research that is being conducted will not be repetitive of other researches that are being conducted in the same field.

[@cherrylynbalingit1899]

Grounding a research problem in existing knowledge is vital for establishing credibility and relevance. By connecting the problem to past research, theory, or practice, the researcher provides context, identifies gaps, establishes a theoretical framework, and ensures practical significance. For example, a study on improving student engagement in online learning would benefit from grounding in theories of motivation and existing teaching methods. Similarly, research on social media's impact on political polarization could draw on studies of political communication and social media use to clarify the problem's significance. Revealing inconsistencies or conflicting statements in research is a key step in advancing knowledge. This process involves identifying discrepancies, analyzing reasons for inconsistencies, formulating research objectives, and contributing to a deeper understanding of the problem. For instance, a study on mindfulness meditation's effect on stress levels might address conflicting results by investigating factors like meditation type and duration. Similarly, research on social capital and civic engagement could clarify discrepancies by examining different definitions and measurement methods.

[@MarilouBuhisan-z2p]

1. The importance of grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing studies credibility and relevance . Because by building upon existing knowledge addressing gaps and demonstrating practical implications . Researches can produce studies that are both rigorous and impactful . For example in Business Research a study of investigating the factors influencing costumers loyalty could be grounded in the theory of planned behavior . This theoretical grounding would provide framework for understanding consumers behavior. 2. The process and significance of revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the context of the four-step method is to formulate precise research objectives and contribute to the advancement of knowledge within the field .

[@JeanaprilBaylon-j9j]

Four step method for stating a research problem and objectives. By connecting the research problem to existing knowledge, researchers can create a strong foundation for their work and increase the likelihood of their findings being accepted and utilized by the academic. A problem exists whe there are statement that are inconsistent or conflict with the base statement....

[@CharmaeVillanueva-m7s]

By aligning the current research with existing theory,enhances theoretical framework it helps establish connections between existing knowledge and the new research,ensuring that the study is built on.Linking the research problem to past theories helps provide context for the study.When a reasearch problem is grounded in past theory,it ensures that the study remains relevant to the field. Identifying knowledge gaps inconsistencies often indicate gaps in existing knowledge verification it is crucial to verify the inconsistencies by cross-referencing different sources or data points to confirm the discrepancies by analyzing the nature and extent of the inconsistencies to understand their implications on research findings address the inconsistencies by either reconciling conflicting statements as valuable areas of further investigation.

[@JevelynDorotan]

Grounding research in the past research theory or practice is crucial as it provides a context and foundation to the study.

[@JeresaMaeBiabas-x2f]

1. Establishing the relevance, legitimacy, and significance of a study depends on its ability to ground a research problem in previous research, theory, or practice. Researchers can place their study within the greater academic discourse, highlight its contribution to the subject, and make sure their conclusions are based on a solid and trustworthy basis by tying their work to existing literature and theories. 2. In the framework of the four-step process, exposing contradictory or incoherent claims is essential to expanding our understanding of a particular subject. When contradictions or discrepancies appear, more research and analysis are required to determine the underlying causes. Researchers can improve the quality of their study and their research objectives by addressing these disparities. In addition, resolving contradictions in research findings is crucial to preserving the validity and dependability of scientific information. Conflicting claims can be acknowledged and addressed by scholars in order to improve upon current theories, generate new hypotheses, and advance their area as a whole. It is via this iterative process of finding, evaluating, and fixing inconsistencies that research practices are continuously improved and knowledge is pushed to new heights.

[@saleRegine-i2d]

Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for establishing credibility, identifying gaps, building a theoretical framework, and enhancing relevance. By referencing established research, a study demonstrates that it is built on a solid foundation of existing knowledge. This helps in justifying the study, allowing for a better understanding of the problem and its purpose. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the four-step method involves critically reviewing existing literature and identifying areas where research findings or theoretical perspectives do not align. Inconsistencies in the literature can help clarify the research problem, formulating research objectives, advancing knowledge, and guiding methodological improvements. For example, a study on the impact of remote work on productivity could identify variables influencing this relationship, advancing the understanding of remote work dynamics. In conclusion, grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice and revealing inconsistencies are both critical steps in the research process. By addressing these elements, researchers can develop well-founded and impactful studies that push the boundaries of understanding in their respective fields. BSBA 3 REGINE S. SALE

[@mardiatukalan4666]

1.Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is a fundamental step in ensuring the credibility and relevance of a study. By demonstrating a clear connection to existing knowledge, researchers can establish the significance of their work, provide context for their findings, and contribute meaningfully to the advancement of their field. 2.Uncovering inconsistencies in existing research is not a sign of weakness but a crucial step in the research process. It allows researchers to identify gaps in knowledge, refine their research objectives, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their field. By addressing inconsistencies, researchers can build upon existing knowledge and contribute to a more complete and accurate understanding of the world around us. Mardia Tukalan BSBA3

[@JeanJalmaani]

1. A well-defined research problem is the cornerstone of any study. It's not just about identifying a topic of interest; it's about establishing a clear gap in knowledge or a contradiction that needs addressing. Ex: A researcher studying the effectiveness of a new teaching method for students with learning disabilities needs to demonstrate that this method is novel or addresses a gap in existing research on effective interventions. They might cite previous studies that have explored other methods, highlighting their limitations or the need for further exploration. 2. Ex. A researcher studying the impact of climate change on biodiversity might find conflicting data on the rate of species extinction. Some studies suggest a rapid decline, while others indicate a more gradual trend. This inconsistency could lead to a research objective focused on clarifying the rate of species extinction and identifying factors contributing to the observed differences.

[@JessaValiente-w2h]

1. Grounding research problem in past research and theory allow it to build upon existing knowledge pushing the boundaries of what is known. This is only contribute to the academic field but also enhances the practical implications of your work. For example, if you are studying new teaching methods grounding your research in educational psychologist theories and previous empirical studies can provide a robust foundation for testing innovative approaches thereby making your findings more impactful and applicable in real world educational settings. 2. The significance of revealing inconsistent or conflicting statement slice in their abilities to highlight gaps or areas of uncertainty in current knowledge. For instance if two studies on climate change present differing result about the impact of carbon emissions on global temperatures, this inconsistency can guide researchers to delve deeper into the methodologies variables or context of this studies by doing so they can design new research that aims to clarify resolve and discrepancies.

[@Jay-annBahian]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is vital for several reasons. 2.In the context of the four-step method, revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements involves. In summary, grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice enhances the credibility and relevance of a study. Revealing and addressing inconsistencies in the literature are crucial for formulating robust research objectives and advancing knowledge in the field. These steps ensure that the research is well-founded, methodologically sound, and contributes meaningfully to the existing body of knowledge.

[@RojunDapiton]

When starting a research, it's key to base the problem on past research or theory for credibility. For example, if studying social media's impact on mental health, referencing previous studies on tech and mental health adds credibility. Identifying conflicting statements is crucial for refining research goals and advancing knowledge. For instance, if studies disagree on a teaching method's effectiveness, resolving these conflicts can lead to more precise research objectives, enhancing understanding in the field. BSBA 3A

[@johnjosephdaguplo6887]

1.Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for establishing its credibility and relevance. It demonstrates that the study is not conducted in isolation but builds upon existing knowledge. By identifying gaps, inconsistencies, or unanswered questions in previous work, researchers can justify the need for their study and highlight its potential contribution to the field. For example, a study investigating the effectiveness of a new teaching method should reference existing research on teaching practices and learning outcomes to show how it builds upon or challenges prior findings. 2. The four-step method, often used in qualitative research, involves revealing inconsistencies or conflicting statements in the data. This process is essential for formulating research objectives and advancing knowledge. By identifying contradictions, researchers can explore the underlying reasons for these discrepancies, leading to new insights and theoretical development. For instance, a study investigating patient experiences with a new treatment might uncover conflicting perspectives on its effectiveness, prompting further investigation into the factors influencing these differing experiencs.

[@JeymarkJailani]

1. Ans : Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice, researchers can establish the significance of their study, demonstrate its credibility, and ensure its relevance to the field. This foundational step is essential for setting the stage for a successful research project and for contributing to the advancement of knowledge in a given field.

[@charitybesin4210]

1. Ans: grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice helps to establish the credibility of the study. By demonstrating an understanding of the existing literature and theories related to the research problem, researchers can show that they are knowledgeable and well-versed in their field. This can help to build trust with readers and reviewers, who will be more likely to view the study as legitimate and trustworthy 2. Ans: by revealing the consistent statements, expressing speculation and developing the objective through the four step method the researchers can systematically and clearly write a research objective that consistent with the problem.

[@RosejeanLañojan-i7t]

1. The importance of grounding research problem , it provides the methods that we might used in creating a research problem by practicing and expressing the knowledge through research. 2. The four-step method involves identifying a research problem, reviewing existing literature, formulating research objectives, and designing a study.

[@PrettyJaneTiad]

1.By grounding the research problem in past studies on climate change, biodiversity conservation, and ecological systems, the researcher can establish a solid foundation for their study. They can reference previous research findings, theories, and methodologies to inform their research design and analysis. This not only enhances the credibility of the study but also highlights its relevance in addressing pressing environmental issues. 2.During their literature review, they encounter conflicting findings from different clinical trials. Some studies report positive outcomes, while others show no significant improvement. By analyzing these inconsistencies, the researcher can formulate research objectives that aim to clarify the discrepancies. This might involve investigating the specific populations studied, the dosages used, or the duration of treatment in each trial. By addressing these inconsistencies, the researcher can contribute to a more robust understanding of the medication's effectiveness and its potential benefits and risks.

[@honestybarro4362]

Honesty A. Barro BSBA 3 1. To establish the validity and applicability of a study, a research problem must be rooted in previous research, theory, or practice. Researchers can highlight the significance of their work and illustrate how it advances the discipline by expanding on the body of already known information. For example, in order to give context and support for their research topic, a study looking at the relationship between social media use and mental health outcomes must first analyze previous studies on the subject. 2. In the framework of the four-step process, disclosing contradictory or inconsistent claims is essential to the advancement of knowledge in a certain topic. Researchers can create study goals that fill in these gaps and advance their understanding by identifying places where the body of knowledge is insufficient or inconsistent.

[@KlepsanRendal]

Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements through the four-step method involves: identifying existing literature, pinpointing contradictions or gaps, analyzing these discrepancies, and formulating research objectives to address them. This process is significant because it highlights areas needing clarification, thereby guiding focused and meaningful research. For instance, if studies on remote work's impact on productivity show conflicting results-some finding increased productivity, others reporting declines-analyzing these inconsistencies helps identify underlying variables (e.g., industry type, employee roles). This analysis can then inform precise research objectives, such as examining remote work's impact across different industries. Addressing inconsistencies is crucial for advancing knowledge as it resolves ambiguities and refines understanding in a given field. By tackling contradictory findings, researchers can build more comprehensive and accurate theories. In the healthcare sector, for example, resolving conflicting data on a treatment's effectiveness ensures that future clinical guidelines are based on robust and reliable evidence, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

[@RojelyncasiponggulaneElyn-y2f]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is important for making the study credible and relevant. By using existing knowledge and theories, researchers show they have a good understanding of the field. For example, a study on social media's impact on mental health may use psychology and communication theories to support its base statement. 2. Revealing inconsistencies in past research helps improve knowledge in a field. By finding differences in previous studies, researchers can set clearer objectives and fill gaps in the literature. These differences lead to new research ideas and a better understanding of the topic. For example, conflicting results on a treatment's effectiveness can lead to research objectives aimed at explaining the differences.

[@leslielumayas-s1h]

1. ANS : The importance of grounding in a research problem in past research , theory or practice is a strong inductive research method for discovering new theories . Triangulation, prolonged engagement with data, persistent observation, negative case analysis, member checks, and referential adequacy are all procedures that can be used to increase the credibility of qualitative studies. 2.The four-step method, a common framework for research, emphasizes the importance of identifying and addressing inconsistencies or conflicting statements within existing research. This process is crucial for formulating meaningful research objectives and advancing knowledge within a given field. The first step involves a thorough review of existing literature to identify conflicting findings, contradictory theories, or differing interpretations of the same phenomenon.Revealing inconsistencies in the context of the four-step method is a critical process for advancing knowledge in any field. By identifying and addressing these discrepancies, researchers can refine research questions, formulate meaningful objectives, and contribute to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the world.

[@RezaMaeBurguite-p5n]

1. To establish a study's credibility and relevance, a research problem must be grounded in previous research, theory, or practice. Researchers can acquire the trust and confidence of their audience by demonstrating that their work builds on existing knowledge and tackles an important gap or difficulty, ensuring that their findings are taken seriously and contribute meaningfully to the advancement of knowledge. Example: A researcher wants to study the impact of online learning on student engagement. To ground this research problem, they could review past research on student engagement in traditional classroom settings, theories of motivation and engagement in education, and practical concerns about the challenges of maintaining student engagement in online environments 2. Inconsistencies must be revealed and addressed, whether through the four-step approach or scientific study, in order for knowledge to advance in a certain sector. The process of revealing differences encourages development by highlighting knowledge gaps, challenging assumptions, and motivating new research. Ex: a study on the effectiveness of a new therapy for depression claims a high success rate. However, other research suggests that the therapy might be less effective for certain subgroups of patients.

[@ShownCadigdig]

Grounding a research problem in past research are the reseaech method for discovering new theories.Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the context of the four steps in method helps in formulating research study,the theory or practice is essentialvfor establishing the studys credibility and relevance.

[@JessieAnnAntawag]

1.Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is vital for several reasons: Example: In a study exploring the impact of social media on mental health among adolescents, grounding the research in past theories like Social Learning Theory or Uses and Gratifications Theory helps establish a theoretical framework for understanding how social media use influences behavior and well-being. 2. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements is crucial in research for several reasons within the context of the four-step method: Identifying Gaps, Enhancing Rigor, Formulating Objectives, Advancing Knowledge. Example: In a study on the effectiveness of a new teaching method, inconsistencies in previous research on similar methods can prompt researchers to investigate factors contributing to the differences, leading to a more comprehensive analysis. BSBA 3 SET-A

[@RinamaeBagundol-q6n]

1.Grounding a research problem serve as a the foundation for a impactful study. Important of grounding a research (is provides context and significance) this is connecting the research problem to existing literature demonstrate its relevance within the broader field. Example:A study investigate the effectiveness of a new therapeutic intervention for anxiety disorders would need to demonstrate its connection to existing research on anxiety treatments, including their limitations and potential areas for improvement. 2.The process and significance of revealing inconsistent or conflicting statement in the context of the four step method a common approach to research formulation, emphasize the importance of identifying inconsistencies in existing knowledge. Inconsistencies help in existing research are not just roadblock,but rather valuable signpost guiding researchers towards new frontiers of knowledge.

[@jessicarombines1672]

1.Grounding a research problem serve as a the foundation for a impactful study. Important of grounding a research (is provides context and significance) this is connecting the research problem to existing literature demonstrate its relevance within the broader field. Example: A study investigate the effectiveness of a new therapeutic intervention for anxiety disorders would need to demonstrate its connection to existing research on anxiety treatments, including their limitations and potential areas for improvement. 2.The process and significance of revealing inconsistent or conflicting statement in the context of the four step method a common approach to research formulation, emphasize the importance of identifying inconsistencies in existing knowledge. Inconsistencies help in existing research are not just roadblock, but rather valuable signpost guiding researchers towards new frontiers of knowledge. B

[@angelynboclot3879]

Angelyn boclot BSBA 3 1.to ensure that all necessary steps are completed in order to gather the most accurate, reliable, and helpful information process because this will help you identify similar features that occur in different fields, and the diversity of purpose and approach in some studies. 2. Clear aims and well-defined objectives provide a specific direction for your research study, ensuring that the research stays focused on a specific topic or problem. This helps to prevent the research from becoming too broad or unfocused, and ensures that the study remains relevant and meaningful.

[@KingGeorge-wh2cu]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for establishing the credibility and relevance of a study. This step involves demonstrating how the research question fits within the existing body of knowledge, highlighting its significance and potential contributions. By connecting the research. 2.The four-step method, a common approach in research, emphasizes a systematic process of identifying a research problem, formulating research objectives, developing hypotheses, and designing a study to test those hypotheses. A crucial aspect of this method is the identification of inconsistencies or conflicting statements within the existing body of knowledge. This step is not only significant for formulating research objectives but also for advancing knowledge in a given field.

[@ChemvegieGimolatan]

1.Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for establishing the study's credibility and relevance. 2.Revealing inconsistencies or conflicting statements within the four-step method is a critical process that fuels knowledge advancement. These discrepancies serve as starting points for formulating research questions and objectives, driving researchers to investigate, clarify, and refine existing knowledge.

[@RizamaeAtab]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for credibility and relevance. By building on existing knowledge, the base statement becomes more robust and informed. For instance, a study on the impact of social media on mental health can reference previous research to establish a solid foundation. This step enhances the study's credibility by showing that it is informed by established theories and findings, making it more relevant and trustworthy to the academic community. 2. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the four-step method is significant for formulating research objectives. By identifying these contradictions, researchers can pinpoint gaps in knowledge and refine the research focus. For example, in a study on the effectiveness of a new teaching method, conflicting findings from previous studies can guide researchers to investigate specific factors that influence outcomes. Addressing inconsistencies in this way advances knowledge by driving the research towards clarifying uncertainties and building on existing understanding in the field.

[@guizzielamoncio2103]

1. By grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice when formulating the base statement, researchers can build on existing knowledge and data from the past. This enhances the credibility of the study by showing the foundation of your research. For example, if a study on increasing productivity among business employees is informed by theories and data from the past, it adds knowledge and credibility to your research. 2. The process and significance of revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the context of the four-step method assist in formulating research objectives by examining contradictions and discrepancies in the data. This is crucial for advancing knowledge in the field by highlighting areas that require further study or clarification. For instance, if your research on customer satisfaction among online shoppers reveals inconsistencies in the results regarding their satisfaction, it helps in formulating clearer and more accurate objectives and advancing knowledge in the field.

[@CharisaOsman-r2q]

Charissa O.Abne BSBA-3 1.Grounding research problem in existing knowledge and identifying inconsistencies within the field are essentials steps in the research process These steps contribute to the credibility and relevance of the study ensuring it's contribution to the advancement of knowledge and the development of more effective research's. 2.For step method is a common framework for conducting research,emphasizing the nature of the process .It's involves identifying a research problem ,formulating data and drawing conclusions.A key aspect of this method is the identification of inconsistencies or conflicting statesments within the existing body of knowledge.

[@AnalynMagsayo-g9c]

Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing its credibility and relevance. This step demonstrates the researcher's knowledge and understanding of the field, identifies gaps in understanding, ensures the study's impact, and provides context and justification for the research. By carefully grounding their research problem, researchers can ensure that their study makes a valuable contribution to the field and has a lasting impact. The four-step method, a common framework for research, emphasizes a systematic approach to problem-solving. While the steps may vary slightly depending on the field, the core principles remain the same: 1. Define the problem, 2. Collect data, 3. Analyze data, and 4. Interpret results. Revealing inconsistencies or conflicting statements within this process is not just a matter of identifying errors; it's a critical step that fuels the formulation of research objectives and drives knowledge advancement. The Process of Revealing Inconsistencies. 1. Problem Definition: there are 3. for example. 1.Contradictory findings 2. Theoretical disagreements 3 Gaps in Knowledge Revealing inconsistencies within the four-step method is not a sign of failure; it's a crucial step that drives research forward. By acknowledging and addressing these inconsistencies, researchers can formulate more precise research objectives, uncover limitations in existing knowledge, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their respective fields. It's through this process of critical examination and questioning that scientific understanding evolves and progresses.

[@MaryJaneS.Deiparine]

Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for establishing the credibility and relevance of a study. By drawing upon existing knowledge, researchers can: - Establish context within the field - Build credibility by demonstrating familiarity with the subject - Identify research gaps and formulate focused research questions - Justify the importance of the study to contribute to the field Examples illustrate how grounded research problems provide a clear understanding of existing literature, identify gaps in knowledge, and justify the need for further investigation.

[@JorelynGalagnara]

1.Grounding a research problem in past research,theory, or practice is crucial in establishing the foundation and context for a study .This steps contributes to the overall credibility and relevance of the study, Establishing context, Building on existing knowledge, Demonstrating scholarly rigor.Example in a study on the impact of social media on mental health, researchers may start by reviewing existing literature on the subject to understand the current state of knowledge. 2. In the research process revealing inconsistent or conflicting statement is essential in the critical analysis of existing literature and theories.These inconsistencies help in advancing knowledge in a given field by Identifying gaps in knowledge, Refining research objectives, Advancing understanding.Example. The effectiveness of a new teaching method in improving student performance, researchers may encounter conflicting findings from previous studies.

[@SittimuniraLibre]

Sitti munira C. Libre BSBA-III 1. By referencing established research and theories, the study is positioned within a broader academic context, showcasing that the researcher is knowledgeable about the field. This builds trust with readers and reviewers, demonstrating that the study is not isolated but connected to ongoing scholarly conversations. 2. If studies on the impact of social media on mental health yield conflicting results-some showing positive effects and others negative-this inconsistency can be the basis for a new study that investigates the conditions under which social media has these varying impacts.

[@aymyang4204]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for providing context, identifying gaps, building credibility, supporting hypotheses, and contributing to knowledge development. By incorporating these elements, researchers can enhance the quality and impact of their study. 2. Identifying inconsistent or conflicting statements in research is crucial for ensuring the reliability and validity of the findings. In the four-step method, this process involves carefully examining the data and conclusions to uncover any discrepancies or contradictions. By doing so, researchers can refine their hypotheses and research questions, leading to more precise and accurate research objectives.

[@wiljoyreganan5248]

1.Grounding your research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing its credibility, relevance, and impact. By demonstrating familiarity with the field, identifying gaps in knowledge, and connecting your research to real-world issues, you create a strong foundation for your study and increase the likelihood that your findings will be meaningful and influential. Education: A researcher studying the effectiveness of a new teaching method might ground their problem in existing research on learning theories and best practices in education. They could cite studies that have shown the limitations of traditional teaching methods and highlight the need for innovative approaches. This grounding would demonstrate the relevance of their research to current educational practices and its potential to contribute to improved student outcomes. 2.Revealing inconsistencies and contradictions is a vital aspect of the scientific process. The four-step method provides a framework for systematically identifying and analyzing these inconsistencies, ultimately contributing to a more nuanced and accurate understanding of a given field. By challenging assumptions, identifying research gaps, and stimulating new questions, the process of uncovering inconsistencies is a crucial driver of scientific progress and knowledge advancement.

[@ChristinePasilan-hw8pw]

By aligning the current research with existing theory, enhances theoretical framework it helps establish connection between existing knowledge and new knowledge

[@mayPearlCalumberan-i4f]

1. Importance of Grounding in Research Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for establishing the credibility and relevance of a study. It demonstrates that the research is not conducted in a vacuum but builds upon existing knowledge, addressing a gap or extending previous findings.Example: A researcher studying the effectiveness of a new teaching method in improving student engagement might ground their research in existing theories on learning styles and classroom management, citing previous studies on the effectiveness of similar methods. 2. The four-step method for formulating research questions guides researchers towards a focused and impactful study. While the initial steps involve identifying a broad area of interest and developing a specific research problem, it's during the transition to formulating research questions and defining research objectives that revealing inconsistencies becomes crucial. Example; Climate Change and Agriculture: A researcher studying the impact of climate change on agricultural productivity might find conflicting research on the effectiveness of different adaptation strategies. This inconsistency could lead to research objectives focused on comparing the effectiveness of these strategies in different regions or under varying climate conditions

[@ErmielynMahusay-n1l]

1. Grounding a research problem in existing literature, theoretical frameworks, or practical applications is crucial for establishing a solid foundation for any study. This process involves reviewing previous studies and theories to identify gaps, inconsistencies, or areas that require further exploration. By doing so, researchers can articulate a base statement that is informed by the context of prior work, which enhances the study's credibility and relevance. 2. The process of revealing inconsistencies in research statements is significant as it helps formulate targeted research objectives and drives the advancement of knowledge by prompting deeper investigation and methodological refinement. ERMIELYN MAHUSAY BSBA III

[@JunrieMijares]

Junrie D. Mejares BSBA-lll Borth SET Sir, Mark Maravillas 1. Grounding Research Problem:Building a Solid Foundation for Inquiry a well -defined research problem is the Grounding this problem in existing research,relevant theory,or practical experience is crucial for establishing its credibility and relevance. This step ensures that the research is not conducted in a vacuum,but rather builds upon existing knowledge and contribute s meaningfully to the field. 2.Unveiling Inconsistencies: Advancing knowledge through critical Analysis The four-step method is a common approach to problem-solving in research. It involves identifying the problem, generating possible solutions, the best option. A Crucial step in this process is revealing inconsistencies or conflicting statements within the existing body of knowledge.

[@PearlMaxienneClimaco]

1.Grounded theory is a well-known methodology employed in many research studies. Qualitative and quantitative data generation techniques can be used in a grounded theory study. Grounded theory sets out to discover or construct theory from data, systematically obtained and analysed using comparative analysis. While grounded theory is inherently flexible, it is a complex methodology. Thus, novice researchers strive to understand the discourse and the practical application of grounded theory concepts and processes. 2.There are a few simple steps to every conflict resolution process, which can you can use for disputes between coworkers or between supervisors and employees. These steps comprise the acronym LEAD-Listen, Empathize, Acknowledge (and Apologize), and Do something. 1. LISTEN Every conflict resolution process begins with listening. 2. EMPATHIZE Now it’s time to take what you heard and do your best to put yourself in their shoes. 3. ACKNOWLEDGE (AND APOLOGIZE) Next, we take empathy one step further and vocalize what we sense is going on for the individual. 4. DO SOMETHING Now, you can move into the solution. After all, you also want to make it clear that something will change, so this won’t happen again in the future. BSBA 3

[@angelinegeromo]

Rather than an engagement in philosophical discussion or a debate of the different genres that can be used in grounded theory, this article illustrates how a framework for a research study design can be used to guide and inform the novice nurse researcher undertaking a study using grounded theory. Research findings and recommendations can contribute to policy or knowledge development, service provision and can reform thinking to initiate change in the substantive area of inquiry.

[@ArgieCelestial]

1.Groupings a research problem effectively is not just a preliminary step but a critical part of the research process that significantly contributes to its credibility and relevance.By organikong related issue into coherent groups,research can deliver deeper into specific aspects, un cover meaningful insights,and ultimately make a more impactful contribution to their respect ice fields. EXAMPLES TO ILLUSTRATE: 1.EDUCATION RESEARCH 2.BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH. 2.The process of revealing inconsistencies or conflicting statements within the four-step method of research not only aids in formulating precise research objectives but also plays a pivotal role in advancing knowledge within a given field.By addressing these inconsistencies,researchers contribute to the refinement of theories,methodologies,and practical application ultimately enhancing the overall understanding and impact of research outcomes.

[@KlepsanRendal]

Ans 2. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements through the four-step method involves: identifying existing literature, pinpointing contradictions or gaps, analyzing these discrepancies, and formulating research objectives to address them. This process is significant because it highlights areas needing clarification, thereby guiding focused and meaningful research. For instance, if studies on remote work's impact on productivity show conflicting results-some finding increased productivity, others reporting declines-analyzing these inconsistencies helps identify underlying variables (e.g., industry type, employee roles). This analysis can then inform precise research objectives, such as examining remote work's impact across different industries. Addressing inconsistencies is crucial for advancing knowledge as it resolves ambiguities and refines understanding in a given field. By tackling contradictory findings, researchers can build more comprehensive and accurate theories. In the healthcare sector, for example, resolving conflicting data on a treatment's effectiveness ensures that future clinical guidelines are based on robust and reliable evidence, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

[@LykaJanaS.Edayan]

Lyka Jana S. Edayan BSBA-3, SET A BACC7 1. To assure the study is based on solid evidence, it is crucial to have groundinging a research problem in past research, theory, or practice. Example for this is if a study references established theories about leadership styles, it’s more credible and relevant. Meaning, this foundation helps the research be focused and meaningful, highlighting the relevance and necessity of the study by showing it’s connected to existing knowledge. 2. Identifying gaps or contradictions in existing knowledge is why revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements is important. These inconsistencies show there’s a problem that needs to be addressed, which then helps in formulating precise research objectives. Example, if one study says principals are democratic and another says they’re autocratic, this conflict needs further investigation. It justifies the need for new research to resolve these discrepancies and advance understanding in the field.

[@KivenAbas]

1.Grounded theory is a strong, inductive research method for discovering new theories. You don't go in with any preconceived hypothesis about the outcome, and are not concerned with validation or description. Instead, you allow the data you collect to guide your analysis and theory creation, leading to novel discoveries. 2.There are a few simple steps to every conflict resolution process, which can you can use for disputes between coworkers or between supervisors and employees. These steps comprise the acronym LEAD-Listen, Empathize, Acknowledge (and Apologize), and Do something.

[@MaryannMangubat-u9d]

Maryann M. Limben BSED MATH. 3 Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing the credibility and demonstrating significance, establishing a theoretical framework, and enhancing credibility, researchers can ensure that their study is well-received by academic community fully to the field. For example: if a researcher is studying the relationship between social media use and mental health, they might reference social cognitive Theory, which posits that individuals learn through observing and modeling the behaviors of others.

[@clarencebersola2467]

BSBA3 SET B 1.Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for several reasons: it provides a solid knowledge base, establishes a theoretical foundation, identifies gaps, enhances credibility, and provides context. This step not only justifies the research but also guides the study design and interpretation of results, contributing to the overall quality and relevance of the research. By situating the research within the broader academic conversation, the study becomes more credible and meaningful to both the academic community and practitioners. 2.Revealing and addressing inconsistent or conflicting statements in research is a critical part of the scientific process. It drives the formulation of precise research objectives, ensures that studies are relevant and targeted, and ultimately contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field. By resolving these inconsistencies, researchers can refine existing theories, improve practical applications, and set the stage for future inquiries, thereby pushing the boundaries of understanding and application in their respective disciplines.

[@klintonsoronio]

Identifying a research problem is the first and most crucial step in any research project. A research problem is a specific issue, gap, or challenge that you want to address through your investigation. It guides your research questions, objectives, methods, and outcomes. Having a theory helps you identify the limits to those generalizations. A theoretical framework specifies which key variables influence a phenomenon of interest and highlights the need to examine how those key variables might differ and under what circumstances. The step for overall credibility and relevance of the study; Authority: Who is the author? What are their credentials? Do they have knowledgeable experience in the field they are writing about? What is their reputation? Accuracy: Compare the author’s information to that which you already know is reliable. Are there proper citations? Is the information biased? If so, does it affect research conclusions Coverage: Is the information relevant to your topic and does it meet your needs? Consider what you need such as statistics, charts, and graphs. Currency: Is your topic constantly evolving? Topics in technology and medical innovation require sources that are up to date.

[@garryesparaguera]

GARRY C. ESPARAGUERA BSBA - 3 1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for establishing the credibility and relevance of a study. For example, if a study aims to investigate the impact of social media on mental health among adolescents, grounding the research problem in past studies on social media use, mental health outcomes, and adolescent psychology helps in framing the research questions, developing hypotheses, and designing the study methodology. 2. For instance, in a study on the effectiveness of a particular teaching method in improving student performance, if existing literature presents conflicting results on the method's efficacy, resolving these inconsistencies through empirical research can lead to a clearer understanding of the method's impact and contribute to educational practice. In conclusion, grounding research in past literature and addressing inconsistent statements are essential steps in conducting credible and relevant research, as they help in building on existing knowledge, identifying gaps, formulating research objectives, and advancing knowledge in a given field.

[@AngelouQuiao]

In question number 1, the importance of grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice was discussed. This step is crucial for identifying knowledge gaps, building upon existing knowledge, ensuring theoretical relevance, and demonstrating practical significance. For example, a study on the effectiveness of a new reading intervention program could be grounded in existing research on reading difficulties and interventions. In question number 2, the significance of revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the context of the four-step method was explained. Identifying inconsistencies helps in formulating research objectives and advancing knowledge in a given field. For instance, research on the effectiveness of different therapies for treating depression could lead to investigating the effectiveness of a specific therapy for a particular subtype of depression to resolve inconsistencies.

[@JohnPaulPancho]

1.Discuss the importance of grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice when expressing the base statement. How does this step contribute to the overall credibility and relevance of the study? Provide examples to illustrate your points. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice significantly enhances the credibility and relevance of a study. Here's how this step contributes to the study's overall credibility and relevance, along with examples to illustrate these points: Credibility: 1. Establishing a Strong Theoretical Framework: By grounding a research problem in past research and theory, a study establishes a robust theoretical framework. 2. Connecting with Current Discourse: Referencing past research places a study within the context of current discourse in the field. Relevance: 1. Addressing Existing Gaps: Grounding a research problem in past research helps identify gaps in the current knowledge base. By addressing these gaps, the study becomes more relevant as it contributes new insights and perspectives to the field. 2. Demonstrating Scholarly Rigor: Referencing previous research and theory shows that the study has been conducted with scholarly rigor. 2.Explain the process and significance of revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the context of the four-step method. How do these inconsistencies help in formulating research objectives, and why is it crucial for advancing knowledge in a given field? Use specific examples to support your discussion. Process and Significance of Revealing Inconsistent or Conflicting Statements in the Four-Step Method: Process: 1. Identify: The first step involves identifying the main argument or statement under scrutiny. This step sets the foundation for recognizing inconsistencies or contradictions within the argument. 2. State: Following identification, the conflicting statement or inconsistency is explicitly stated. This step involves directly addressing the discrepancy between different statements or arguments. 3. Support: Supporting the conflicting statements involves providing evidence or rationale for the inconsistencies. This step may include referencing previous research, data, or theories that contradict or challenge the initial statement. 4. Summarize: The final step summarizes the significance of the revealed inconsistencies. It emphasizes the impact of unresolved contradictions on the argument and highlights the importance of addressing these inconsistencies. Significance: 1. Formulating Research Objectives: Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements helps in formulating precise research objectives by identifying gaps in existing knowledge. 2. Advancing Knowledge in a Field: Addressing inconsistencies is crucial for advancing knowledge as it fosters critical thinking, encourages deeper analysis, and promotes innovation. Specific Examples: 1. Example in Environmental Science: Revealing conflicting statements about the impact of deforestation on climate change can inspire research objectives aimed at clarifying the relationship between deforestation rates and carbon emissions. By addressing inconsistencies in previous studies, researchers can develop hypotheses that guide further investigation and contribute to a better understanding of environmental issues.

[@maritesborden3038]

1.grounded theory is a strong, inductive research method for descovering new theories.You don't go in with any preconceived hypothesis about the outcome, and are not concerned with validation or description.Instead, you allow the data you collect to guide your analysis and theory creation,leading to novel discoveries 2.review past studies on subject similar to your problem statement, that is, studies that use similar methods, variable,ect.

[@jeanrheareyes9860]

Process and Significance of Revealing Inconsistent or Conflicting Statements in the Context of the Four-Step Method: The four-step method involves identifying, stating, supporting, and summarizing arguments, often used in debates or research. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements is crucial in this method as it helps in challenging existing arguments, clarifying positions, and advancing knowledge in a field. 1. Identify: The first step is to signal the claim being addressed, which sets the stage for revealing inconsistencies by pinpointing the specific argument or statement under scrutiny. 2. State: After identifying the claim, the next step involves making a counterclaim or response. Revealing inconsistencies at this stage allows for a direct comparison between opposing arguments, highlighting discrepancies or contradictions. 3. Support: Supporting the argument requires referencing evidence or justification. By revealing inconsistent statements in the evidence presented, researchers can question the validity of claims and prompt a deeper examination of the supporting data. 4. Summarize: Finally, summarizing the argument involves explaining its importance. Revealing inconsistencies in the summary stage helps in emphasizing the impact of unresolved contradictions or conflicting statements on the overall argument. How Inconsistencies Help in Formulating Research Objectives and Their Crucial Role in Advancing Knowledge in a Field: 1. Formulating Research Objectives: - Identifying Research Gaps: Inconsistencies in existing literature or conflicting statements can highlight gaps in knowledge. - Setting Clear Goals: Inconsistencies help researchers define specific research objectives by providing a clear focus on areas where clarification or further investigation is needed. 2.Advancing Knowledge in a Field: - Promoting Critical Thinking: Addressing inconsistencies encourages critical thinking and analytical reasoning. By exploring conflicting statements, researchers can develop innovative approaches, challenge existing paradigms, and push the - Driving Research Innovation: Resolving inconsistencies through research objectives drives innovation by encouraging researchers to explore new avenues, test alternative hypotheses, and propose novel solutions. boundaries of knowledge in their field. 1. Example in Psychology: Inconsistencies in studies on the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders can lead to formulating research objectives that aim to compare different CBT approaches, identify factors contributing to treatment success, and address contradictory findings to enhance therapeutic interventions.

[@jorichocatubay5464]

NERIZA O. TABLADA BSED MATH-3 1. ans, Grounding a research problem in past research is crucial for credibility and relevance. It demonstrates the research question's genuine need to address gaps or inconsistencies in the field, such as examining the effectiveness of a new therapy for anxiety. 2. ans, The four-step method of problem formulation, objective setting, methodology, and data analysis is essential for advancing knowledge in a field. It identifies inconsistencies and gaps in understanding, ensuring research is relevant, credible, and addresses pressing questions within the field.

[@vincentrayelugsanay1412]

1. importantnce of grounding in research One study found grounded people had lower nighttime levels of cortisol - too much of the hormone can have negative effects on your health. In the study, grounding better aligned the hormone with a natural 24-hour circadian rhythm. A regular circadian rhythm is linked to better health. 2.Comparative ratio analysis likewise helps analysts and auditors spot accounting irregularities. By analyzing ratios, information regarding day's sales in receivables, leverage multiples, and other vital metrics can be determined and analyzed for inconsistencies.

[@JovenMaghuyop]

Joven maghuyop BSED-FILIPINO 3 1.Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for establishing credibility, relevance, and building upon existing knowledge. By referencing previous studies and theories, researchers demonstrate their understanding of the field and justify the significance of their study. 2.Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in the context of the four-step method helps researchers formulate research objectives that address gaps in the literature and contribute to advancing knowledge in a given field. By identifying and resolving inconsistencies, researchers can generate new insights and refine existing theories, ultimately enhancing the understanding of the research topic.

[@LiezeljaneSabac-dk1ml]

Liezel Jane Sabac BSBA 3 Grounding a research problem in the past research this theory or practice ensures the study's foundation solid relevant this steps can validates the problems that can significance and align with the research establish knowledge enhancing the credibility. FOR EXAMPLE a company with a high attrition rate that has not done any research on this area before may choose grounded theory to inderstand key reasons why people choose to leave.. 2.the reveling incosentent or conflicting statement in research it can helps advance knowledge by identifying and understand the different studies have different results. This process aimed at the resolving , these conflicts for instance in Education.

[@ArjieOclarit-m4s]

ARJIE OCLARIT BSBA 3 1. Ans: grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice helps to establish the credibility of the study. By demonstrating an understanding of the existing literature and theories related to the research problem, researchers can show that they are knowledgeable and well-versed in their field. This can help to build trust with readers and reviewers, who will be more likely to view the study as legitimate and trustworthy 2. Ans: by revealing the consistent statements, expressing speculation and developing the objective through the four step method the researchers can systematically and clearly write a research objective that consistent with the problem.

[@belyntaghap337]

Belyn T. Espinosa FILIPINO III 1. Building on the past research, theory or practice helps in grounding a research problem and enhancing its credibility and relevance. This step indicates that the researcher is aware of what information exists currently within the field as well as where it is absent. For example, if there was a study carried out on how effective this new teaching method is, previous studies about classroom tactics alongside educational philosophies would be referred to indicating the basis and importance of this study. By placing this research into context of what has already been done in this area, an individual enhances its reliability for both academic and practical purposes. 2. The four-step method reveals inconsistencies or conflicting statements which assist in identifying gaps and areas of controversy among existing knowledge. It involves a process whereby he/she searches through literature that has contradictory results which then informs their objectives for research aimed at addressing these problems. For example, this can be exemplified when there are mixed findings from previous studies regarding climate change impacts on agriculture where such contradictions may necessitate a new study to clear them up. Addressing these conflicts is important since they enable theory refinement and broader understanding of topics together with their concepts.

[@CarloVerallo-y5o]

Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial as it helps to establish the context and rationale for the study. By referencing existing knowledge and literature on the topic, researchers can demonstrate their understanding of the subject and show how their study builds upon previous work. This step contributes to the overall credibility and relevance of the study in several ways. Firstly, it helps to establish the significance of the research problem by showing that it is not arbitrary or isolated, but rather part of a larger body of knowledge. This can help to justify the need for the study and explain why it is important to investigate the issue further.

[@jelynolvds]

JELYN L . OLAVEDES BSED FILIPINO III 1. The research problem in previous research , theory or practice is crucial for several reasons: . Establish Credibility - Existing research theories and shows that the research is built on , established knowledge, which increase the credibility of the research. Example: - a democratic research style ( giving the school teachers the right to make their own decisions on teaching methods) - a autocratic leadership style ( the teachers have no right to determine their own teaching methods and the principals have the final say in all decisions) 2. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statement in the content of the four step method 1. Formulate Clear Research Objective - clarify the specific research question 2. Advances Knowledge - the understanding of the subject matter. 3. Enhances methodological Rigor -the use of more rigorous and diverse methodologies 4. Guides Practical Applications - the comprehensive and reliable evidence By grounding the research and revealing inconsistent or conflicting statement are based on past research finding a theory or practice ,that exist in the research problem.

[@heidemananquil2953]

1.Example 2: Research Problem: The effectiveness of a new training program for improving employee performance in customer services . This research problem can be grounded in existing research on customer service training, employee motivation, and performance management. The study could draw upon theories of learning, organizational behavior, and the principles of effective training design. By connecting the research problem to these existing frameworks, the study demonstrates its relevance to the field of business and its potential contribution to improving employee performance and customer satisfactions. 2. Research on the link between diet and heart disease has produced conflicting findings. Some studies have shown that a Mediterranean diet is beneficial for heart health, while others have found that a low-fat diet is more effective. To conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of a Mediterranean diet and a low-fat diet on cardiovascular health in adults with a family history of heart diseases.

[@mariaandreacocamas9425]

1: Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice helps establish credibility and relevance by showing that the study builds on existing knowledge. For example, a study on the impact of social media on mental health could reference previous research on the subject to demonstrate its importance. 2: Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements helps in formulating research objectives by identifying gaps in knowledge and understanding, leading to advancements in the field. For instance, identifying contradictory findings in studies about the effectiveness of a particular medical treatment can motivate the formulation of research objectives to resolve the inconsistencies.

[@joeysagang7981]

1. When working on a research project for school or in a professional setting, it's helpful to follow a process to analyze your data and form conclusions. The research process allows professionals and students to take part in extensive studies or experiments that can provide answers to specific questions or challenges. Understanding how to complete the research process can be useful in helping you make new discoveries or more informed decisions. 2. To address why it's important to consider basic research design issues before conducting the study, consider how doing this provides clarity of objectives, assesses the feasibility of the study, ensures methodological soundness, plans for data collection and analysis, addresses ethical considerations, minimizes bias, and efficiently allocates resources. Addressing inconsistencies is crucial for advancing knowledge as it resolves ambiguities and refines understanding in a given field. By tackling contradictory findings, researchers can build more comprehensive and accurate theories. In the healthcare sector, for example, resolving conflicting data on a treatment's effectiveness ensures that future clinical guidelines are based on robust and reliable evidence, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

[@LyndieCallora-v3h]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is important when expressing the base statement because it provides a solid basis that highlights the relevance and necessity of the study. This step ensures that the problem is well defined and rooted in credible and relevant sources setting which lead to a focused and a meaningful investigation. 2. These inconsistent or conflicting statements arise from past research findings , theories or practical experiences. By identifying and highlighting these inconsistencies, the researcher demonstrates the existence of a problem that needs to be addressed. After revealing the statements that are inconsistent with the base statement, the researcher can express speculations based on the identified in the previous step and can now suggest potential explanations or hypothesis that require for a further examination. Later on, the researcher can develop the research objectives based from the inconsistent statements identified earlier in which the research objectives clearly outline the specific goals of the study. And by defining these objectives the researcher provides a focused and structured plan for the study ensuring that each objective is targeted towards resolving the identified problem and advancing understanding in the area of interest.

[@JemareDitche]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is crucial for establishing credibility, identifying gaps in knowledge, providing context, enhancing relevance, and facilitating comparisons. By referencing established work, researchers demonstrate awareness of the existing body of knowledge, highlight the significance of their study, provide a framework for their research, connect their work to practical applications, and allow for comparisons with previous findings, ultimately contributing to a more robust and impactful research process. For example, A study on the effectiveness of online learning platforms might reference past research on e-learning and educational theories like constructivism to establish a foundation. 2. Revealing inconsistencies or conflicting statements within a research field is a crucial step in the four-step method, which involves identifying the research problem, reviewing existing literature, highlighting inconsistencies, and formulating research objectives. This process is significant because it clarifies what is known and uncertain, leading to precise research questions. Addressing conflicting findings can advance knowledge, refine existing theories, and guide future research by identifying gaps and providing a roadmap for future studies. Jemare Ditche BSED ENGLISH III

[@sharamaenalug9383]

1.Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential for establishing the credibility and relevance of a study. By demonstrating the study's connection to existing knowledge and its potential to contribute new insights, researchers can enhance the impact and value of their work. This step ensures that the study is not merely a repetition of previous work but a meaningful contribution to the field.A well-defined research problem is the cornerstone of any successful study. Grounding this problem in existing research, established theory, or practical experience is crucial for establishing the credibility and relevance of the research. This step ensures that the study builds upon existing knowledge, addresses a significant gap in understanding, and contributes meaningfully to the field. 2.The four-step method, often used in argumentation and debate, emphasizes the importance of identifying and addressing inconsistencies or conflicting statements. This process is not only crucial for constructing compelling arguments but also plays a vital role in scientific research, particularly in formulating research objectives and advancing knowledge within a field.Revealing inconsistencies in research is not a sign of failure but rather a crucial step towards advancing knowledge. By acknowledging and addressing these discrepancies, researchers can move beyond superficial understandings, formulate meaningful research objectives, and contribute to a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the world around us. NALUG ,SHARAMAE M. BSBA-3B SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF LABASON INC.

[@elykadonaire8991]

1. Grounding research in past work is crucial for making research credible and relevant. By building on existing knowledge, researchers show they understand the field and can address important problems. For example, a study on new teaching methods for students with learning disabilities should look at previous research on learning disabilities and teaching approaches to make its findings more meaningful. 2. Identifying inconsistencies in research is key to advancing knowledge. When studies conflict, it highlights gaps that need further exploration. For instance, if one study shows a teaching method works well while another says it doesn't, researchers can investigate why. Resolving these discrepancies leads to new insights and helps research progress.

[@Cathcath124]

Cathlyn Faith Bagundol BSBA 3 SET A Here's a four-step method for effectively stating a research problem and objectives: 1. Identify the Research Topic: - Start Broad: Begin with a general area of interest that you want to explore. This could be a phenomenon, a trend, a gap in knowledge, or a social issue. - Refine the Focus: Narrow down your topic to a specific area within the broader field. This will help you define a manageable research scope. - Consider the "Why": Ask yourself why this topic is important and what knowledge gaps exist. This will help you identify the problem you aim to address. 2. Formulate the Research Problem: - Clearly State the Issue: Express the problem in a concise and specific way. It should be a question that your research aims to answer. - Highlight the Significance: Explain why this problem is worth investigating and what the potential implications of your findings could be. - Avoid Value Judgments: The problem statement should be objective and neutral, avoiding subjective opinions or biases. 3.Define Research Objectives: - Specific and Measurable: Objectives should be clearly stated and quantifiable. They should outline what you intend to achieve through your research. - Actionable and Achievable: Objectives should be realistic and attainable within the scope of your research. - Linked to the Problem: Each objective should directly address a specific aspect of the research problem. 4. Structure the Research Question and Objectives: - Problem Statement: Begin with a clear and concise statement of the research problem. - Objectives: List your research objectives in a numbered format, clearly outlining what you aim to achieve.

[@claudineedrial4953]

1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice ensures the study's foundation is solid and relevant. This step validates the problem's significance and aligns the research with established knowledge, enhancing credibility and context. For example, a study on educational technology effectiveness should reference previous findings and theoretical frameworks to justify its investigation. 2. Revealing inconsistencies in the four-step method highlights gaps or contradictions in existing knowledge. This process helps formulate precise research objectives by addressing these discrepancies. For example, if prior studies on diet and mental health show conflicting results, a new study can aim to resolve these conflicts, advancing understanding in the field.

[@janeonipa]

JANE ONIPA BSBAIII Both Set Sir Mark Maravillas LESSON5 Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is paramount to establishing the credibility and relevance of a study. This step ensures that the research question is not merely a random inquiry but a meaningful contribution to existing knowledge. By demonstrating a clear connection to prior work, researchers establish the significance of their investigation and its potential impact on the field. Grounding research problems in existing knowledge and revealing inconsistencies are crucial steps in the research process. These steps ensure that research is relevant, credible, and contributes meaningfully to the advancement of knowledge. By carefully considering the existing literature, identifying gaps and inconsistencies, and challenging existing assumptions, researchers can produce impactful and insightful research that contributes to the development of new knowledge and understanding.😢😂😂

[@JulieroseAlipan]

CHATRINE JANE B. ALIPAN BSED- ENGLISH 3 1.Grounding a research topic in previous research theory entails linking your research question to current knowledge and expertise in your field. Building on a foundation of prior work ensures that your research is relevant, insightful, and contributes to the ongoing conversation in your field of study. By grounding your research problem in previous research theory, you demonstrate that your work is informed by existing knowledge and that your findings will contribute to a deeper understanding of the topic. This increases the credibility and impact of your study. Changed Words Structural Changes Longest Unchanged Words Rephrase

[@novacapapalac]

Nova Capalac BSBA 3 B 1. Grounding a research problem in past research, theory, or practice is important because it shows that the study is based on existing knowledge and builds upon what is already known. This makes the research credible and relevant because it demonstrates that the topic is recognized and studied in the field. For example, if researching new cancer treatments, citing previous studies on similar treatments helps establish a foundation and shows how the new research adds to current understanding. 2. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in research helps identify gaps in understanding. This process is crucial because it guides researchers in formulating clear objectives that address these gaps, leading to advancements in knowledge. For example, conflicting findings on the effectiveness of dietary supplements in improving health can prompt a study to clarify factors influencing outcomes, thus advancing scientific understanding.

[@greixmw3]

1. Grounding your research problem in past research, theory, or practice is essential because it builds credibility, shows you understand the current knowledge, avoids repeating old work, and helps others see why your research matters. For example, if you're studying digital learning tools in education, you should review past studies on these tools and their effects on learning. This helps identify what’s already known and what still needs to be explored. In business, if you’re looking at remote work’s impact on productivity, you should examine previous studies and theories to understand the current findings and gaps. 2. Revealing inconsistent or conflicting statements in research helps advance knowledge by identifying and understanding why different studies have different results. This process shapes research objectives aimed at resolving these conflicts. For instance, in education, if studies on homework effectiveness show mixed results, your research can focus on understanding under what conditions homework is effective. In business, if studies on social media marketing have conflicting outcomes, your research might explore factors like the type of product or marketing strategy to clarify when social media marketing works best. This helps refine theories and improve practices.

[@JeligenMaglinao]

Since it gives the study context and a solid foundation, grounding research in previous research theories or practices is essential.