Let's talk about...AIRFIX 😳

A new series of vids where I review current model manufacturing companies, their noticeable key features, what they do really well, what is not so good, & subjects they should maybe consider in the future...First: Britains modelling pride, (the Hornby-owned) AIRFIX, Surely one of the most-improved model manufacturers out there?
I started buildingAirfix kits over 50 years ago, so thought we should start with them...
Regarding my grumbles about the Hornby TV programme's rather disproportionate obsession with trains, - it reminds me of this amusing clip from the 'A Few Dollars More' movie:
• For A Few Dollars More...
😂
Next Time: REVELL...🫣
Coming soon: Tamiya, ICM, Takom, GWH, etc.
...For more similar content, please check out my channel: / @peter-oxley-modelling... .
Please like, share, comment & subscribe!

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Please do NOT comment unless you watched the WHOLE vid. Several folks have taken my remarks out of context after obviously watching only a minute or two & anyone suspected of making comments like that will have them deleted.

[@glencwilson]

Airfix at the moment are passionate about the kits they are producing. They also seem to care about how the kit can be built by the modeller. There is also a decent balance between detail, complexity, and cost. Finally, Airfix don't seem to be tainted by the greed of the Hornby model railway brand.

[@Flingwing24]

Yep...if only they would produce some new moulds of the classics such as the Halifax, Westland Scout and Beaver. But it's history v what sells. If you know you know I guess

[@flyduck]

love the recent airfix kits - first airfix in 1979. We are lucky to have airfix still around

[@benmanning4340]

Peter, you hit the nail on the head with the line "people tend to behave like sheep" I love it - it's often what I say. After all, all you have to do is just look at the news and see that people love to copy each other nowdays and can't think for themsleves.

[@davidhinkson8856]

I started this hobby with Airfix kits and have rediscovered them over the last two years since I have got back into aircraft modeling after an absence from that aspect of the hobby for some 20 years. I would say if you are a an aircraft modeler they are a good choice, especially some of their newer and updated subjects. It's also very nostalgic to see the rereleases of the older kits as "Vintage Classics" because they bring back a lot of childhood memories.

[@judebrad]

Definitely, we need the stands back - the old transparent ones - they only cost pence to add but the value is more than the raw price of the stands.

[@alantoon5708]

The current Airfix can seem to do no wrong. However, they need to guard against making their kits too complex and too expensive for the average modeler.

[@jaws666]

Also need to expand the range of subjects...just look at what they used to produce back in the day compared to today....as peter said a new tooling Jaguar and Tornado areva must....also remember when they used to do a Viggen,Draken,F-14/15/16/18,F-5,mig -21/23/29,Mirage F-1,mirage 111 and as for helicopters remember they did a lynx (army and navy versions) ,Gazelle,Scout,Wasp,Chinook,Wessex,Puma etc.need i go on

[@leddyzee247]

Really interesting, can’t wait for the others in the series. I recently finished the Tamiya 1/48 F4UD Corsair and was disappointed by the fact Tamiya assumed the modeller wanted the aircraft “wheels down”, despite the box art showing it flying. With my limited skills I made it with wheels up and did some surgery on the pilot and placed him inside. It’s actually turned out pretty well, so I totally agree with your point about the stands and pilots. Great channel, already subbed

[@Slycockney]

I built my first Airfix kit around 56 years ago so have a certain affinity to the brand, as that was really the only brand that was available at the time. I agree that Airfix have stepped up to the next level regarding Quality of moulding, decals and the instructions in recent years. I have no idea how their marketing research reaches a decision on which new kits to release, but I guess there is some science to it. These days I buy my kits by subject rather than manufacturer, but have to agree Tamiya are the benchmark in terms of moulding quality. Excellent video, thank you.

[@pinchageek]

Just finished the Ferret, my first 1/35 Airfix armour kit and what a terrific kit, I went to order another and they are sold-out !! As an Aussie I will do a second one as a NSW Lancer Vehicle. Enjoying the videos, can't wait for the Tamiya talk. Cheers from Downunder.

[@louishiggins8881]

Made 1/72 scale Airfix models as a boy, when they came in bags 😂 - bought with pocket money from Bateson's in Blackpool (anyone remember them). Started making Tamiya tanks with my son (not really interested), and now have a 1/48 scale Mosquito I really need to finish 😂. Worked in aerospace in the UK, so have a Tornado kit waiting in the wings, and might spring for the F35B (if I save my pennies). The Airfix Buccaneer is a definite possibility, from my time visiting Brough. A good Jaguar would also be interesting !!! Have of course visited Cosford, and will again later this year - highly recommended !!!

[@adamswitlak1242]

From my perspective Matchbox and Airfix were since the beginning like Beatles and Stones. Loved the Beatles, but world without the Stones wouldn't be completed. Living behind the Iron Curtain wasn't easy for a young modeller in the 70ties and 80ties. Usually you had to buy the kit which was available on the Black Market. Humbrol was a luxury, that is why in the beginning I preferred more colourful Matchbox, with better clear parts, and stunningly beautiful artworks. Years later I am professional modeller, creating models and figures in 3D, printing and painting them for my clients, but always remember about my good old friends - Matchbox and Airfix, which gave me the fundamentals and passion for our great hobby. It is good to have Airfix still on Market.

[@davidgoddard594]

Just following up. I mainly do armour but when I do aircraft having crew figure is a huge seller for me. Tamiya never lets you down in this area.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Yes indeed...Airfix need to rethink this and stop copying the worst examples in the industry, and follow the best, even if the figures add £3 or so on the kit cost.

[@jaws848]

​​@@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Labim done with Airfix....when i opened my Mig -17 the decals were missing and when i opened my P-40 starter set everything other than the kit was missing....no glue,no decals,no instructions,no paints and no paint brush....and these were new kuts and not 2nd hand

[@jaws666]

​@@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Labfurther to their nonsense policy of not producing kits of stuff in service even the Army gets a shout out in the quickbuild series....2 kits of the Challenger Main Battle Tank (1 green and 1 sand) and the AH-64 Apache which the Army Air Corps use so come on Airfix....get it together

[@jaws848]

So our pleas to Airfix for a new Tornado or Jaguar have fallen on deaf ears.. well Italeri jave a new two seat Jag in 1/72 so im buying that kit instead of waiting in vain hope for Airfix to do 1....which we both know they wont.​@@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab

[@jamesdowning37129]

Really enjoyed this. Kepp up the great work!!

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks James! Tune in to see the Revell show for some (fully justified) 'Kinetic Rant' style entertainment...Coming SOON! 😆

[@paulholloway1447]

Airfix still going, so are Tamiya .love both tbh.

[@Calatriste54]

Really enjoying the Ju-87 Stuka R 1/48.. can't speak for anything else. Built mine in a ground version. Next, in flight. Bravo, Airfix!

[@markgordon2260]

I remember some of my first Airfix kits. The Stirling, which my Grandfather bought me for A$5 in ~1970. At that time, in Australian currency, the price in A$ matched the Series number. The Stirling was nice - a bit of detail under that greenhouse. I have recently bought two classics - the Higgins Boat and the LCT in 1/76 - have both made up into nice models. And then the recently released 1/48 aircraft.

[@kenhanson1819]

Another great video, Peter! I've got about 60 Airfix kits in the stash that vary from their 1970s kits up to nowadays. They have improved considerably over the years, and I hope they continue on that trajectory. I've had problems getting replacement parts for a kit I bought here in the US, which I find strange, as I'm told they have an excellent customer service. The kit is currently being produced by them, so I can't understand what the problem is. I'm using their recommended channels, but have not yet had a response from them.

[@craigrice4479]

Something that cost nothing has no value - wise words Peter. I couldn't agree more about the diorama bases. Matchbox vehicles are still being sold 40 years later - so they must be desirable/profitable.

[@simonleib1992]

For me in the 70's Airfix were expensive and I much preferred Matchbox as they were far cheaper and more colourful. Many years later coming back to models, matchbox has long gone. I buy my models from Airfix and love the quality can now afford the bigger scale ones.

[@ianbutler8776]

Peter, you talk a lot of sense and it is important to not be tribal. I am relatively new returner to modelling and I made some rookie mistakes e:g buying Tamiya's Sea Harrier and Revell's F4U Corsair. If I had listened to you and other considered modellers I would have known a little better. However we all learn from our mistakes and I am fascinated by the way that you think and feel about kits and the companies that make them. Carry on my friend!!

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks Ian! 👍🏻☺️

[@harrymedina7470]

I've always Liked Airfix Kits for Many Years,

[@jakeybear5452]

Some really good thought provoking points of view put over in this episode. I think this , " Let's talk about... " series is going to prove very popular..👍👍

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks Dude…especially ‘Let’s talk about Revell’! 🤣

[@jakeybear5452]

🤣🤣👍..

[@EricIrl]

@@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab Looking forward to that one 😁

[@sebastiansekinger5070]

Gannet, Seaking, Buccaneer........I would love Airfix to release a kit of the 4th Ark Royal!

[@stevenartmann2642]

Their recent kits are great, havent built the Buc yet but the Seaking was a dream, have the Gannet in my stash and that looks impressive. That said i was a little disappointed with the 1/24 hellcat, the cockipt tub needed lots of filing to get into the fuselage, the wings in my kit were warped and the clear parts were cracked

[@ModelkitStuff]

Peter as a life long Airfix fan and a channel owner that actively promotes a lot of the Airfix stuff when it is released, I totally enjoyed your video, you raised som good points. Personally think Airfix are the best all-round model company of them all. some company's do a certain element better but nobody gets the balance right like Airfix.

[@typhoon2827]

The Wellington kit is excellent. New tool 72'Buccaneer on the bench atm is also very high quality.

[@ryanparkin6156]

So glad you said it Peter!! The jaguar and tornado are top of my airfix wish list!! Gotta be in <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="108">1:48</a> scale though. I'd be happy to buy tornado gr1 both in camo and gulf war colours and an f3 too. I agree they need pilots too but the pilots they do when they do do them aren't very good not when compared to other manufacturers.

[@robertgraves8843]

I think they should bring back the 1/32 multi pose figures. Always assuming it's financially viable.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

You know what, that is a good shout, they were cool! 👍🏻

[@davidgoddard594]

Thank you Peter for this. A couple of things. One model specific and the other isn’t. We had a hobby shop here in Toronto and I got on very well with Dave🤫. He told me ,as a man in the business, that model companies could make every version of a tiger, Sherman, 109, spitfire, and no matter what, they would be his big sellers. He said he couldn’t stock enough Tamiya Tiger versions. Great for people new to the hobby. As an aside about being a Tamiya fanboy, I just finished a Tamiya 1/16th full option Centurion tank and posted pictures on line and wouldn’t you know it that Simon Dunstan posted that the markings I put on never existed in Korean for a Cent Mk3. There you go Tamiya has had the same decal sheet from their Early Cent releases in the 70’s the 1/25th and now 1/16th🤷🏻. Model companies will generally make something that will sale. My first kit back in the late 60’s was a Mk1 male WW1 tank, from Airfix in the plastic bag with the cardboard top part stapled to it, like Frog and yes I’m that old. The Hobby shop that I bought my first kit from still is here in Toronto and that is Johns photo hobby, shout out to John, Heide and Roger. I won’t go on about modeling. But agree with your synopsis here. Now about the wine. As a young man in the late 60’s and early 70’s we had a show in Canada called” The Galloping Gourmet “ . the host was Graham Kerr and he always had a glass of wine or poured a refill as he went to a commercial break. I became a chef because of this show because he made cooking look like fun. Any way keep it up mate as I have gone on to long.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks David! I am old enough to remember Graham Kerr! We had him here on the BBC...a role model for Keith Floyd!? You might also like this from the archive: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bXO6e42MiqiMkJI

[@davidgoddard594]

Keith Moon?

[@markneal1175]

Hi Peter, new subscriber, love your channel content and your presenting style looking forward to joining you !

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Welcome aboard!

[@lonnie4894]

I have 2 Airfix kits, a DC-10 and an English Electric Lightning fighter jet in 1/48th scale. Nice kits I think. I have their 1/144th scale kits of Classic airliners.

[@StevenPotts-ij9ue]

Hi Peter , I fully endorse your comments on Revell kits, I was a big fan of these back in the day and remember well building the Corsair in the 70s, I thought it was a great kit back then but I agree that it is rather dated now. I would like to thank you for taking these companies to task for churning out old kits disguised as new products, cheers Peter. r

[@jimaltergott9326]

Another great presentation Peter! I agree with you about Airfix and the effort to be trendy with the brief posts on their channel. I too am a subscriber and find it ridiculous to see those 30 second posts about really nothing. The short attention span of the social media world is rife with stuff like that. Bores me silly! 🤪

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Tomorrow: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z6jXpnWZect3ncUsi=SlaYG8_JbuK_84Qt

[@welshparamedic]

Spot on with ref to Jaguar, Tornado and Typhoon! why of why the Gannet? to much a Niche product!

[@wojciechkoska3515]

Yes Peter, "crucial ". If for any other reason at least because less and less young people pick it up, and you promoting it publicly, on line, is quite an undertaking. You have quite powerful enemy standing against you, this being an internet, and social media, as well as expectation of "instant gratification ". When was the last time one saw a kit being built on TikTok, or model kit being sold in a department store? Keep up good work, I enjoy your content. Personal question, wearing gloves, any particular reason? Please forgive me if I got to personal. Loved your cycle on Matchbox kits. 👍

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks! The gloves are there to avoid finger marking, I always use them when modelling too...I had intended to get the sprues out without realising the bags were still sealed...it's ok, I don't have a mechanical hand (Like Luke Skywalker!) or anything! 🤣

[@wojciechkoska3515]

@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab Just curious. Thanks for great work you are doing.

[@jesselomas8626]

The 'railway' buildings mould went to Dapol..

[@alantoon5708]

And...also have found out about Takom's instructions myself! It is good to know your subject well in advance...

[@johnlathwell7667]

Thumbs up for a new Jag, long overdue and as you say plenty of accessible examples to research. Worked on them for 13 years as RAF and MOD civvy, so has a place in my heart😊

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Well said! 👍🏻

[@NazidKimmie]

Hehe, love your reference to a good modeling buddy down under in Beckers models! He'll love the shoutout and the love for inflight! I agree with your assessment of Airfix (Becker won't! He stays away from them now) but I think some of their later kits (excluding those terrible Spitfires) are quite good, still not top tier engineering but they do subjects which are interesting at a reasonable price point (though they are not that cheap for us Antipodean modelers!)

[@beckersmodels]

I actually have ordered the new Sea King, just to have a look (ok to do inflight!) and I do like their Walrus..but not much else in the 1/48 or 1/24 categories..And they are getting quite expensive down here arent they? Oh and I just have to do a Gannet inflight dont I?

[@daviddillon5908]

@@beckersmodelsplease do the Gannet. Love to see you do it in flight dropping a torpedo…

[@stephenlovelock5563]

Hi peter,good one mate,agree with a lot of what you said,very entertaining much appreciated,can’t wait for the next episode,well done mate.

[@AndrewC6]

I am glad you mentioned something about hard vs soft plastics. Now I know its not a fluke. I have had kits where the plastic seemed almost like a hard wax and others were so hard it sounded like tin or a glass cup if dropped on the floor. The harder plastics can be uncooperative for good seems.

[@DrChinnery73]

Airfix should do some operation banner themed kits pumas, Wessex’s and saracens and landrovers from the period etc

[@arkbuilder2012]

Grew up with Airfix and Airfix today has never been better - label me a ‘fan boy’. As an American who loves Brit subjects, keep them coming. I will say that with the advent of 3d printing the hobby will change immeasurably. I may still see a 1/48 Blackburn Blackburn after all 😂

[@typhoon2827]

It's already available, mate.

[@GavinNerazzurri]

I agree with much of what you say. Personally, i think Airfix were in a really bad place - economically and creatively. I think since then, whilst still making some odd decisions, they've really turned things around. New moulds, better instructions and decals too, rereleasing older moulds but not glossing over that like Revell. They're not perfect, but I really feel they're going in the right direction, and from strength to strength.

[@Jeff-cv4qn]

As a kid many many years ago all my Airfix aircraft kits were built with pilots shown in flight

[@EricIrl]

The Spitfire kits , of whatever scale (hopefully) are profitable and cash cows for Airfix. They therefore should be able to subsidise the less popular (and less profitable) projects such as the 1/48 Gannet from the proceeds generated by the popular kits. I think it's a good policy - as long as they can afford to do this. When Hornby first took over Airfix in 2006, they did get quite a bit of criticism for releasing some of their ancient kits in the new red boxes with no indication that they were old models. I'm actually in the middle of building the red box release of their 1968 Handley Page Hampden. I think the current policy of releasing their old kits as Vintage Classics is excellent as it does indicate that the kit will be an older moulding and, with classic box art, will certainly appeal to those of a certain age. Although you hinted that you were not enamoured with a certain company who are still releasing old kits in new boxes (I can guess who you mean). Don't forget that they also went through a period, about 20 years ago, of releasing old kits with their original box art and labelling them as "Classics". They seem to have dropped that policy now but I am sure Airfix were partially inspired by this. It's also honest - which I admire.

[@paulcrombie9623]

The Short Stirling by Airfix was a nice kit, it had a few rags, but it was a nice kit. I couldn't get my head around how it had such a short wingspan though, at first I thought it was a manufacturing fault, but it did have short wings in comparison to the length of its fuselage.

[@davidshanahan5134]

They made the wings short so it would fit into a standard hanger. Then they had to make the wing chord very deep so it had enough wing area. This made it have a very low ceiling - could barely get over the Italian Alps with a bomb load, and also vulnerable to flak and night fighters. Of course during the war most bombers never got into a hanger so the design was compromised for nothing.

[@EricIrl]

Apparently, the "fit the hangar" story is now considered a bit of an "old wive's tale".

[@ericadams3428]

Indeed It was not the hangars but the Air Ministry being concerned about the growth in the size of aircraft.

[@andrewgrave]

Some great analysis which hopefully the new Hornby CEO will see. Agree on the social media. There was a recent one on the railway kits range they sold to Dapol and the presenter asked if they should be reintroduced! This must have done more harm than good! By the way, it was Palitoy in the early 80s who introduced those naff model kit photographs on random maps and blue prints. Humbrol continued this for about a year or so but soon reintroduced box art. I do wonder if they should use an older Airfix logo for the Vintage Classics range. The Palitoy era logo they use for the range doesn't look vintage enough to me!

[@MultiPedroAndrade]

i love the Scimitar, would be great to have it 1/48 or 1/32

[@sebastiansekinger5070]

Personally, I 'm very pleased with the Spitfire. I have been waiting for an improvement on the original 24th scale Spitfire for years. I'm enjoying it very much! Also impressed with the recent releases, they are verriied and interesting choices........but thats just me! A much improved lineup of models compared to a decade ago! As for Tamiya, I have always loved them! I think you're right about the instructions, though.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Fair enough! 😊

[@kenashton5315]

Don't normally comment as I'd normally just be repeating what everyone else has said but this was especially enjoyable so here goes. Couple of small negatives to start and one that may be out of your control. This was a long video but didn't seem like it because it was so engaging. However I had adverts with no let up every 5mins for the entire thing which on a couple of occasions I was tempted to turn off. Also a section where quite a bit of negativity came across at once. All valid points but maybe should have been dispersed throughout. 100% agree with the Airfix classics comment. They've done it right, nostalgia sells and you know what you're getting before you open the box. Cartograf decals are a touch of genius and in a couple of cases they've redone the clear parts, plus you get some unusual subjects. Never considered your point about the Gannet, I jumped on it because of the unusual subject and it's been massively popular on pre order but I never considered that a year from now all us older modellers will have one and the longevity in the future may be limited. I'm on board with you about crew figures. Never used to bother but I'm coming round to the idea that they add extra interest, especially for aircraft in flight. I want to do the Lancaster with crew outside the aircraft but options are limited. I bought some of the, "nostalgia" stands you mentioned and mine were fine so maybe you were unlucky. Looking forward to your Revell slot, I imagine the 1/32 Hornet will get a mention. Finally I agree with Phil Flory that you should build one of your Hallowed Matchbox kits😄, when I was a kid they were the best affordable option and I was drawn to the vehicles especially because of the included dioramas, Airfix take note. Brilliant video, can't wait for the next 👍👍👍👍👍

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks Ken, very good comment there! I decided to do the slightly negative feedback all in one go to get it out of the way, as overall I am a strong supporter of Airfix. But I have a whole shelf of built Matchbox gems, (one of them, - the Chaffee Tank - on the Flory Forum) so don’t worry! As for the next talk (Revell) Yeah the F-18 will get a mention plus other crimes they committed…better get the Popcorn ready, Lol! 🍿🤣

[@brucemcc2303]

You look well hench in those gloves!

[@russellbenton2987]

My first Airfix kit was a Republic Thunderbolt , aged 6 back in 1968 ! Love the brand . Stopped building them about 1975 . Just wish they’d extend their classic British Aircraft to cover things like British Airliners . A Viscount or early Comet in 1/72 .

[@markthomas5515]

🤔Peter maybe Gannet not as widely used as the Jaguar. Gannet, British Navy, Australian Navy, German Navy, Indonesian Navy three out of four big operators and modelling areas. Jaguar Britain, France, Oman, Ecuador, Nigeria, so one more operator but only two big modelling areas. I think your argument falls down in my opinion. But as you know I’m happy for once a manufacturer is targeting Fleet Air Arm over RAF as they have been the silent cousins for too long. Great broadcast, I always enjoy your opinions and keep up the excellent work.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

You forgot INDIA ON THE Jag...And two major FAA - themed releases in the same year made no sense to many of us, but thank you for your support. 👍🏻

[@jamesvozar1]

Would be great if Phil had you on as a guest sometime, would be way more entertaining then some of his regulars. ;)

[@user-ft2zh4bp9d]

I knew someone who owned a Fairey Gannet , a real one His mate bet him 10 grand he wouldn’t get it a foot off the ground Unfortunately he crashed his helicopter and copped it I’m sure he would have done it He was a determined bloke 👍

[@wolfmon9]

Would love a typhoon jaguar and wildcat😊

[@BingLHui]

If the 1/72 Wellington has a full interior, how about a transparent half fuselage from the same mold or something with cutouts with large transparent panels as a separately sold add-on ?

[@BingLHui]

Yes I did the revell type vii u boat and the interior is a dust magnet

[@paulcrombie9623]

I remember when I was a kid, I used to build pocket money FROG kits, you used to get them in a polythene bag with the card attached at the top, those were the days!

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

So like this, maybe? 😃 kzbin.info/www/bejne/bXO6e42MiqiMkJI

[@JohnSmith-ve8mj]

Hi Peter yes I agree with you, the Gannet not a great choice even the revell frog version didn't sell that well. The idea of a 2 seater eurofighter is cool and defo a Tornado retool long overdue!!

[@Flingwing24]

Yea....I was a bit anti Airfix for many reasons but being British, I have to say I am mightily impressed (as a returning modeller) with their current standards. Their <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="108">1:48</a> tiger moth is a beauty as no doubt are many others. The Gannet? Odd yes, but Naval aviation and the older aircraft in particular have a big following. How the hell do you think we Army aviation bods feel? Classics or their <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="108">1:48</a> scale Lynx (beauty but an opportunity missed) if you can get one. Perhaps using the income from the gimmies will allow them to appeal to the more obscure (but important) British types. Westland Scout or Wasp one day? Beaver perhaps.....Austers? A Lynx 5 or 1GT from Granby? PS.....I want an Airfix Wellington even more now....and me....exe Army....WTF😂

[@chrisdoney8578]

Hey not being a Peter Oxley fan boy here coz he got slated for his last lawn mower video 😂😂, but I have to agree.... the stands are utter crap and a new range of decent stands are required (Airfix we would pay more for a better stand). Also pilots.... yes, yes, yes! Pilots are a defo consideration. Dioramas not so hung up on but they would be nice. As for modern jets I definitely agree. I've had to buy (all 1/72) Hasegawa Jaguar, Eduard Tornado and Italeri Typhoon because Airfix (my preferred brand most of the time) do not have decent new toolings of the mentioned subjects. Love the rebranded classics range and the new tool kits of the last 10 years have been pretty awesome. Although saying that I have had multiple quality control issues like having a duplicate sprue but missing another like 2x A, 1x B but sprue C missing. Also badly moulded parts ( exhaust manifold on 1/72 Hawker Tempest). Looking forward to the ferret scout car and hoping for a 1/72 new tool Javelin 🤞. Keep up the good work both Airfix and Peter 👍👍

[@davegreenwood7575]

Difficult to make ang interesting discussion when the hobby is now such a diverse sprawl of unique modellers. Your brave to stick your head above the parapet. I'm an ancient modeller that oddly buys a kit then makes it. No stash no work station and will purposely go for say a 1966 Revell kit and love turning it around . Weird eh! So, no I don't agree with all your opinions, but who'd want to just live in an echo chamber. Well done Peter. 👍

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

We may disagree, but I respect and Salute you Sir! 🫡👍🏻

[@davegreenwood7575]

One more thing...Gannet, Buccaneer, Phantom, Wessex and Seaking. So where was I in the early 70's. Steaming flat out to British Honduras.

[@alistairscott137]

The new Airfix Vulcan is one of my favourites.

[@Ryan_Munday]

Airfix have a typhoon in 1/72, quote a good kit but the other kits you mention I agree with. Another great kit is the Vulcan

[@simonleib1992]

I started with Matchbox models they were cheap and simple to build. Airfix were more expensive and I always saw them as more advanced in detail. Coming back to modeling after many years Matchbox is no more sadly. But the Airfix brand was my go to. The only brand I knew tbh. I have built a few Tamiya and was very impressed by the quality and detail. It has a solid and well earned reputation. I agree Airfix does have a few niggles, but overall the kits I have built are good quality, and sometimes require a bit of problem solving. But for me that is part of the fun of modeling. As Peter said his views are subjective but I feel they are fair and constructive opening up debate. We all have our views lets discuss them in a respectful manner. Great video Peter as always. I have my Anson yet to be built.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks Simon. The Anson is a beauty. 👍🏻

[@MrVolvobloke]

Be nice if airfix designed the box that the AFV's came in so it could be printed with a scene that could be used as a backdrop to display the model.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

A plastic one (a la Matchbox) would be even better, no? 👍🏻

[@adandap]

One of the things that modellers always seem to overlook is that companies are in the business of making money. Tamiya's Spitfire IX makes no money for Airfix! (And vice versa.)

[@martinwalton2850]

Excellent video Peter. Some well reasoned arguments there especially around the current trend for short videos that don’t add anything (a detriment to their excellent marketing of kit releases), and I agree about diorama choices and storytelling in model making. It’s a big deal at the moment - think back to the one model everyone seemed to be talking about at Telford last year with its giant water burst. Instead of fairly random tie-ins with tea and coffee makers, why not partner with someone like Games Workshop who know how to make figures, or Woodland Scenics for a range of diorama materials?

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Great comment Martin, thanks. 👍🏻

[@tomroland5467]

I'd say it's a commonly held opinion that Airfix has much improved. Agree that a Jaguar would be a nice addition to their current range.

[@jaws848]

Improved as far as tooling and engineering i would agree with but they have dropped the ball big time in so far as the subjects they release now as as oppsed to years ago....as far as subjects are concerned airfix are but a shadow of what they used to be.

[@captainmagenta899]

Airfix know the Gannet won't be a huge seller; it's a niche luxury that they're able to indulge a keen fanbase with because they also do big bucks Spitfires. It's a tricky balance for them and they won't appeal to everyone all of the time, but I'm really glad they're still around producing some wonderful kits. A Jaguar will be coming, it's only a matter of time. Also, don't write-off the Gannet's international appeal. The American chaps who present the Model Geeks podcast had been urging Airfix to make one not long before it was announced. The "they don't do anything that's still in service" thing is just a myth. The recent 1/72 F-35 proves that.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Hope you are right...I am sure we all agree it's good they are still around & thriving. Good point on the F-35...Time for a long-overdue Eurofighter Typhoon then Capt. Magenta 😄👍🏻

[@captainmagenta899]

@@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab I agree 100% on the Hornby programme, there was a definite shift towards NEEDS MORE TRAINS in the second series. So much time devoted to a dud scale!

[@greenhilldesign]

I've had a good mix of good and great recent airfix kits. I think that your focus was on the premium <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="108">1:48</a> scale kits but remember that the smaller <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="67">1:7</a>2 scale kits and starters are a big market share for them. Can look at price point of these and how they have stretched over last few years. Same tool typically 1/3 more costly now than recent releases. Sea fury case in point.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

I did show the 1/72 Wellington. 👍🏻

[@TringmotionCoUk]

I think the danger is it is always hard to step back and look truely objectively. There's been remarkably few total failures of late, with the exception of wingnut wings. What was notable was how long it has taken to clear the built stock. What concerns me more with Airfix is the slash and burn sales to clear stock, as , for me , it removes the shine of buying something "box fresh" , as they are supposedly a "big player", but actually I'm not so sure in global sales terms. I like the way they have designed kits all the way through, as you say with some of the Chinese kits, you are much more likely to open the box - shut it and then pick an airfix from the stash. With new kits I do not know the answer, but the older buyers are literally dying off, and it will come to the point eventually where a spitfire will not automatically guarantee the cash machine to ring. Many WW2 aircraft already would be considered too risky now for a new high production tool, such as the Blackburn Botha or the Martin Maryland. I was really lucky to sell a 50s classic car recently, the youth now clamour for 90's "classics", which makes me think that airfix chose the "wrong" land rover, a 90's defender,freelander or discovery might have done bettter.

[@johnscarsandstuff]

Thats was an interesting video. I've subscribed as a result, because I would like to hear your views on other companies.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks for the sub!👍🏻

[@simonbradburn]

I bought the 1/24 harrier by Airfix in 2011 and to be honest it was a pig to fit together, I swore i would never by another kit from them again, but the harrier kit was from 1972, and after watching your review I'm going to take the plunge and try one of the kit's you mentioned. I also agree they do seem to live in the past regarding aircraft kits.

[@Flingwing24]

Peter....which wellington was that you have on the video? Sounds daft but there are enough to make a cock up....

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

1/72 Mk1.a/c Wellington. 👍

[@ellbowski]

Like many I started model making as a young kid, Airfix and Matchbox being the only ones available usually...started again after a long break and did some small kits until buying the Airfix 1/24 Spitfire, celebrating the great Polish fighter pilot Jan Zumbach. Nearly put me off Airfix forever, utterly abyssmal fitting. Might buy one of the newer kits eventually..

[@fightersweep]

Enjoyable video and some interesting points too. I agree with the social media aspect, but likewise, I'm not much of a social media type either. I'm not sure who or what demographic they are aiming those videos at and they do seem a little pointless. Agreed on the Jaguar. It's quite clear that a decent Jaguar is something a lot of modellers want...me included and I build very few jets. The 1/24 Spitfire IX. Personally, and I know I'm in a minority here, I love building 1/24. I've got two of the old 109Es on the go at the moment. Still a great blank canvas for some super detailing and scratch building. I have a Tamiya 1/32 Mk IX and XVI too and despite both being awesome kits, they aren't a 1/24 scale Spitifre IX and Airfix delivered there. There's already some fantastic conversions for a 1/24 Mk XIVe lowback and fingers crossed, I'll get my modelling holy grail, a 1/24 conversion for a Griffon Mk XIVe. It's a kit that holds a lot of possibilities for us larger scale nuts. The armour guys seem very excited about the Ferret, so I think think that must have been a good shout, and as for the Bond Bug? Well, that kit hasn't been released since 1975. It was fetching ridiculous prices second hand, so I think it was a good choice for the "Classics" range. I bought a couple and due to it only having been released twice before, the moulds are in lovely shape and the kit is very crisp and fits a treat. I really hope we see some more of those 1/32 cars as I would sell granny for the Maxi, Marina, MG 1100, Mini etc. I applaud Airfix for the classic range. It's up front about what you get (although us old farts already know that), we get fab new decals, and in a few cases, re-tooled transparencies....the Achilles heel of a lot of these old kits. We also don't have to pay silly prices for the originals either. Win win! Matchbox "Classics" range anyone? Sorry for the long ramble. Keep up the good work Sir!

[@qwerk707]

What about a 1/48th scale Sea Harrier.?. Its Fleet Air Arm which as you said is Airfix's latest favorite subject and no longer in service so it fits the bill. I know they have a 1/72nd kit but an upscale kit with better detail and either a Falklands era one or more recent conflict such as the NATO Bosnian and Yugoslavia operations. It was also operated by India so there's another option for markings. There aren't any really good 1/48th scale Sea Harrier kits on the market so it will be a good seller. Could also have some great box art...dogfighting Argentine Mirages or Sharkey Ward shooting down a Pucara..

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

I agree 100%

[@JeffJefferyUK]

I'm of similar age to Peter and I believe our experiences in the early 70s were also similar. I hated Airfix after I built a kit of theirs which had wing halves that were so thin they just warped and melted after I applied the cement, and the rivets just looked huge. Thankfully along came Matchbox, which I absolutely loved. I lost interest in model making sometime around '79, or early 80s. A decade or two later when I became vaguely interested again I remember going in to Modelzone and being utterly bemused that there were no Matchbox kits at all! Anyway, it's good to see that Airfix models ARE actually good (now) after all. I just need to finish redecorating our spare room and then I'll get back in to the hobby properly!

[@EricIrl]

Some older AIrfix kits were (and still are) excellent - especially those produced around the mid 1970s. Your experience of melting the plastic was most likely down to your over youthful over enthusiasm in applying the poly cement (we've all done it). Thee recently re-released Lockheed P-80 is a lovely little kit.

[@jefthing]

Have a look at Revell - the have the old Matchbox moulds and have released some old Matchbox under the Revell name. The Fairey Swordfish, for example.

[@martynholland7965]

Very interesting video as usual. Who makes the lights you have on your table?. Keep up the good work. Thanks

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks Martyn. They are LIGHTCRAFT. 👍🏻

[@martynholland7965]

Thank you for speedy reply have ordered from Amazon. Hopefully I will be able to see my kits better

[@johnbollig2790]

Peter, I have over 500 airfix kits. I know you love airfix kits. The real disappointment is that there is no metal wing hurricane in 1/72 scale. Unfortunately, i won't be able to buy airfix kits locally. Hobby Lobby stopped selling airfix kits. They need more kits in North America. They also need a 1/72 scale Hawker Hunter.

[@nalrog297]

I wanted for for so long for 1/72 or 1/76 - Bedford MK/RL (so many variations that could be done ) and FV43x

[@paulkilich4727]

Germany really. Nice lampshade give it a nine. LOL

[@arjunarabindranath]

I would definitely buy a Gannet! Jaguars are still used by the Indian Air Force I believe.

[@glenmckinley7409]

Great company I do miss there blister packs however.

[@judebrad]

I've had some quality issues with Airfix, such as warped plastic parts. (In this case the Whitley). I tried as best as I could but was not able to align the wings correctly clamped over several days.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Hmmm, Yes they are also guilty of issues even on the recent releases like the Sea King, with Short-Shots (missing plastic).🤔

[@andreastimper9848]

I am very happy they did a Gannet. The last kit we had of this aircraft in <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="108">1:48</a> scale was a vacuformed one. The German Navy bought quite a buch of them and there are at least two of them around in German museums, so I will buy it as soon as it hits the shelves here in Munich. So I guess at least in the UK and in Germany, they will sell well. Also, the <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="84">1:24</a> Spitfire is extremely nice, I hope the next kit will be a 109 to go with it.

[@Armadacon]

I only wish Airfix did the Gannet in 1/72nd.

[@seanfoster3052]

The Jaguar would be very popular in India! I think the still operate it. Potential cashcow

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Of Course! That was the country (& maybe Equador?) I couldn't remember. 👍🏻

[@daveco4645]

​@@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-LabNigeria too

[@Runway_Models1987]

Revell and Airfix have been bought out a few times. I was really surprised Airfix did the F-35. I haven’t even considered Airfix till this year. I always associated them with starter sets with crappy paints and toys. I preordered the seaking I hope they continue pushing forward with affordable quality and great subject matters. I was excited when Tamiya did the F-35A but now we need a F35C it never ends lol

[@jimrichards3621]

Airfix are definitely making progress, judged by recent releases, but still way behind not just Tamiya, but lots of other much smaller companies. The Hunter is a case in point, latest release is retail of £46. The cockpit is bare, the seat poor and lets not talk about the surfact detail. Im currently building the Buccaneer, which I really like, but still its a bit average. ICM, Eduard, Wingsy all make a much better al round product, judged by fit, detail and come with masks, etch etc. The saving grace for Airfix is subject choice, so I have the Seaking and Gannet on order, and 100% agree they should/MUST do a Jag and I will get the RAF Buccaneer too.

[@jaws666]

As far as the aircraft are conserned they have a SERIOUS lack of fast jets and helicopters.....who ever makes the final decisions on what subjects to cover really needs to take a long hard look at themselves.

[@FinsburyPhil]

Just on your point about being disappointed with the choice of a Spitfire Mk.IX by Airfix for their latest 1/24th release - I sort of agree. Yes they have to be commercial so their new landmark kit was probably always going to be a Spitfire, but a Mk.V would have been more interesting. Not clashing with the Tamiya Mk.IX, more desert and Malta schemes and Trop additions and a Seafire F Mk.III version. It was the most produced Mark. Re the Gannet, maybe Airfix feel that for say every 9 popular subjects, that funds a 'fringe British' subject that no one else is likely to pick up? Btw Peter, I give you a 10/10 for your channel.

[@daviddillon5908]

Great video Peter. Agreed a Jaguar and Typhoon would be hit sellers. Do you think Airfix are using the social media posts and KZbin shorts as a quick/cheaper way to conduct market research?

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Thanks David...But I honestly don't know what they are doing with it, it seems pointless and utterly childish (even irritating) at times. It doesn't seem focussed enough for Market Research...I think we need more new product and a bit less PR to be honest...

[@Der-Tag]

A little belated I am afraid. Definitely agree with you Peter for us Cold War warriors a Jag and Tornado would be fabulous. I would prefer these in 48th and I would love to see the earliest incarnation of the Tornado as in its publicity shots of the time with a belly full of dumb bombs with orange warheads. Lovely !!!!!

[@peterm7593]

Merry xmas

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Same to you, Peter! 🎄🎅🏻

[@welshparamedic]

sepecat Jaguar.....India used them and still does.

[@paulkilich4727]

The thing with the Spitfire Cockpit door was wrong. No door jam and the door didn't have edges. I stopped after fixing all that. Forgot I had it. Still not done. LOL

[@richardmanintveld7618]

The only reason why I built airfix as a kid was because it was all I could afford. Then I got my hands on some Matchbox kits, and I threw everything I ever built from airfix in the bin.

[@Armadacon]

I did the same. Matchbox kits were cool. When Matchbox went away. I went back to Airfix.

[@stevenmccolm1531]

I can't understand why Airfix hasn't released the Avro Lincoln or Avro Shackleton MR. 1 plus the Avro Shackleton MR.3 as they would make good subjects. A new tooling of the BAe Nimrod MR.2P or a1/72 de Havilland Comet 4C. A new Lockheed Neptune is needed.

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

They seem to be bogged down on WW2 trucks, Ferret scout cars and Gannets that very few people asked for, instead of reaching out to customers.

[@brianquinlan8891]

It’s a bit odd to me that airfix don’t make aircraft that are in service in the uk but they have an F-35 kit? And starter kits of the typhoon and such…

[@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab]

Good point Brian! I had forgotten that! Well, maybe someone from Airfix can explain that?