RN to BSN class video on Levels of Evidence in research literature.
Пікірлер: 25
@jovenkyna2 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for this video! Now I'm confident to continue my assignment
@morenikeadesanya2738 ай бұрын
You are good at imparting knowledge into people's brain! Some people are good, but do not know how to impart the knowledge into others, trust me. Thank you!
@physiotherapistpaulina93404 жыл бұрын
This was very useful , and clear. Thank-you so much. I feel I have a much better grasp on this concept now.
@lorrainecoleman97865 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Your video was very helpful!! I will be looking out for more from you!
@AA-sx9xu2 жыл бұрын
it worth listening. Awesome job on clearly explaining the topic!
@houmamkitet95554 жыл бұрын
Thanks you very much for this clear and easy to understand review
@user-vy6er3vm1b9 ай бұрын
Thank you! Well spoken and very clear explanation.
@melaniemoment18973 жыл бұрын
this was wildly helpful! thanks
@abdulelah24011 ай бұрын
Very helpful, Thank you
@bobmirror71642 жыл бұрын
Well said. Logic keeping so called logic opinion in check.
@rinavickery25632 жыл бұрын
Thank so much this is very informative
@madrums0072 жыл бұрын
thank you so much!!
@Jo-dp3de Жыл бұрын
Very concise, thanks.
@hamzaaymanhamdi92125 жыл бұрын
Rebecca you are amazing
@danecustance27342 жыл бұрын
Thanks this is helpful.
@soyllamu2 жыл бұрын
Buen video, nuevo sub.
@bhuwinderbains14353 жыл бұрын
If I get secondary resources. Author of resources has used quantitative studies for systematic review of given clinical problem. What level of evidence it would be? TIA
@OneWithWonderland2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@t.c.54562 жыл бұрын
Thank YOU
@dunningkruger91224 жыл бұрын
I'm curious how data collected based on memory from an environment filled with confounding variables can be considered reliable. That would mean that all forms of evidence in the pyramid aside from randomized control trial data and calculations and systemic reviews and meta study of randomized control trials contain reliable data and calculations. Also at the base of that pyramid, expert opinion, is considered the least reliable. Aren't all conclusions expert opinion on the data collected? Also isn't the pyramid itself an expert opinion thereby making the pyramid the least reliable form of evidence supporting the pyramid itself? Also how do you draw causative conclusions from associative data? Correlation is not causation. That being the case you can't conclude anything clinical from the epidemiological studies in the pyramid. That being the case, the only reliable sources of evidence would be randomized control trials and systemic reviews and meta analysis of randomized control trials. Am I misunderstanding something?
@bluesquirrel24722 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. Maybe fix your audio, it's quite low
@profwurmi71203 жыл бұрын
an alle kölner
@monsieurayala10 ай бұрын
04:16 Quantitative research is "purely objective". Why on earth do people keep (erroneously) repeating that? If a scientist said that in my lab, they would be immediately blacklisted for such an abomination.