劉細良盜相真相曝光，一代新聞攝影師陳橋含冤而終

Рет қаралды 23,383

芒向編輯部

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 132

@viviennetam9482 6 ай бұрын

支持陳女兒控告劉這條友！

@winniey2298 6 ай бұрын

🙋💜💜大家好才是真的好💜💜💜 支持芒向👍👍👍支持許留山唱獨腳戲節💪💪💪💪💪

@conniecheong4062 6 ай бұрын

早安！💜

@winniey2298 6 ай бұрын

@@conniecheong4062 老友早晨🤗🌹🌹

@samtsui6570 6 ай бұрын

@@winniey2298Winnie 早晨!😉🌻🌞🏆

@winniey2298 6 ай бұрын

@@samtsui6570早晨🤗🌞🍵 多謝你🤗🏆

@Leo1601 6 ай бұрын

佢先係真正嘅鬼

@ykleung5932 6 ай бұрын

劉細良在香港2019時在網台不停叫香港人出去衝,自已就在家裏看電視。後來就買家襠離開香港,留下一班熱血青年受罪。就在自已網台說自己沒有能力去承受一些後果，所以才離開香港。所以這種人極之無恥。

@hard8yung 6 ай бұрын

人無恥便無敵😄

@Kowloonhongkong 5 ай бұрын

這一班是假民主納粹主義者. 同真黃的不同. 回顧歷史回顧報章, 市民手牽手安靜地在家到兩旁一字排開. 佔領旺角只有靜坐沒有搞事. 你話有的, yes. 絕對有,不過根本不是這班人這班真黃色的人. 搞使者是納粹主義假冒民主人士. 數目只是少數人士. 不過好可惜地被誤作黃色代表

@hard8yung 6 ай бұрын

真係唔明Dpk 攞埋D錢離開香港還死心不息妖言惑眾好心低調D 積下啲福享受下人生好嘅100歲唔好嘅70歲呢啲先係人生哲理

@wonglam570 6 ай бұрын

這類人邊有人性，邊信報應！

@hard8yung 6 ай бұрын

@@wonglam570 同信耶穌一樣

@cici3159 6 ай бұрын

《南華早報》內容資源主管 Weldon Kong說明，2017年2月劉細良以賀陳橋九十歲壽辰、助他出書為名跟報社接觸。就南華早報證明了出書的目的是賀壽去發問幾個問題： 1. 為何沒有在出版的書或在甚麼地方提及出版目的？ 2. 為何整個出書過程架空了壽星公即是書的作者陳橋？有書作者本人的同意書嗎？ 3. 出版賀壽誠意程度有幾多？為何照炒舊本？ 4. 為何所有賣書的收入劉某自己據為己有？ 5. 出書壽星公應是高興，為何他反而悶悶不樂？ 6. 劉某這麽尊重老人家要出書幫他賀壽，為何喪禮上又未有見到這份尊重？

@shirleyliu5209 6 ай бұрын

老千作孽，必得惡果！

@悠言樂 6 ай бұрын

當年流教主話幫記協，去溫哥華訪問橋叔，訪問完畢後，問橋叔借左佢既相片USB；橋叔諗住佢係記者，咪借左比佢，點知條友仔⋯⋯😢

@sdai2925 6 ай бұрын

許留山及芒友大家好！

@gojira573 6 ай бұрын

此劉無恥到極

@hangfonglin4069 6 ай бұрын

許留山🍄好各位💯芒友好💕💪🙋

@flonrancetham353 6 ай бұрын

許留山好🌻💞大家好🤗

@samtsui6570 6 ай бұрын

Flonrance Tham 早晨!😉🌻🌞

@flonrancetham353 6 ай бұрын

@@samtsui6570 Sam Tsui🤗中午好🌻🍀☕

@kolau4014 6 ай бұрын

多謝許潺的分享！

@sanwanlam5614 6 ай бұрын

老屈亡者和亡者的親人真無恥

@bettysullivan1052 6 ай бұрын

君子愛財取之有道。多謝分享這個故事。對攝影師的厚度致敬。真真假假，天知地知。天理自有分明，祝他們好運。

@hungkeungwong2915 6 ай бұрын

三拾幾年前，有些朋友在深水涉做地產，有時會有些不知價的老人家去賣樓，他們會用低於市價或低至不合理價格買入圖利，自已資金不足會用溫和軟禁方式將老人家留下再將機會賣給同行。行為合法，但賤格。

@一葉輕舟-e2s 6 ай бұрын

陳嘅女兒可以認識晒佢父親嘅所有朋友？？？包括佢哋講嗰啲乜嘢，同意過甚麼？其實用過腦諗吓都知好耐人尋味？

@hungkeungwong2915 6 ай бұрын

@@一葉輕舟-e2s 用吓個腦就知一個九十歲老伯將畢生心血免費送比一個人係發生乜野事。

@hungkeungwong2915 6 ай бұрын

@@一葉輕舟-e2s 呃老人家的賤格地產佬最多都係呃一半，劉無良講過乜嘢可呃九十歲老人家畢生心血已不重要，結果係比佢呃哂。

@amylamcf52 5 ай бұрын

橋叔年紀老邁, 八十歲開始陳小姐時常陪伴左右兼做秘書及管理爸爸一切事項, 怎么不知？

@chanhauking357 6 ай бұрын

👍👍👍支持許Sir評論🎉🎉🎉

@小阮自在人生游yuensan 6 ай бұрын

相由心生。

@annachan9849 6 ай бұрын

多謝許潺，讓我清楚事件🙏

@billlam4018 6 ай бұрын

早上大家好支持许留山

@悠言樂 6 ай бұрын

流教主永遠不會令人失望！流教主粉絲涼粉，更加不會令人失望！巧取豪奪，是老千常用的伎倆！

@kml9612 6 ай бұрын

橋叔被人過咗一棟

@董大牛-g8n 6 ай бұрын

大家好支持许留早上

@tina-2-J 6 ай бұрын

謝謝許生分享

@kml9612 6 ай бұрын

望 “唯天下之至诚能胜天下之至伪，唯天下之至拙能胜天下之至巧”

@taimanchan-ro6or 6 ай бұрын

騙子，呃一個老人家，仲吾糸乞丐

@kevinw3190 6 ай бұрын

當年唔知賣乜，叫人上店，隨便放下錢都可以，第二集話有人放底十蚊，拒絕收，鬧人當佢係乞兒，佢唔係乞兒，係"大種乞兒"！

@datyeung6821 6 ай бұрын

佢点止呃一個人逢人坤

@danielng5903 6 ай бұрын

Good morning everyone .Inspector Hui . Thanks for sharing . 💯💯💯💯💯💪💪💪💪💪 .

@Momo-s9b 6 ай бұрын

支持許san

@queeniechow3214 6 ай бұрын

劉細良眾多鐵粉!仍敢扙義執言，心存敬重，巳訂閱支持

@XinHui-b3c 6 ай бұрын

这個刘细良，應該叫做小不良！

@chunming6686 6 ай бұрын

佢唔係不良，佢直頭係賤精

@朱宝凝-t7q 6 ай бұрын

早晨留山哥哥，各位芒友朋友，大家好謝謝你說話黎智英事情😊

@陳小明-g7s 6 ай бұрын

佢個樣又幾似古惑仔系列做肥佬黎個南燕

@judykwok3259 6 ай бұрын

許留山，各位芒友，大家好。🌞😺🤗☕

@samtsui6570 6 ай бұрын

Judy Kwok 早晨!😉🌻🌞

@judykwok3259 6 ай бұрын

@@samtsui6570 早上好。😺🤗☕

@bantingkit8660 6 ай бұрын

☕🌷💞許留山好，芒友大家好😊❤️🥝。

@jaytso1883 6 ай бұрын

Let the court decide 🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️

@conniecheong4062 6 ай бұрын

早安！💜

@winniey2298 6 ай бұрын

Connie Cheong 老友早晨🤗💖🌹

@queenieng5804 6 ай бұрын

等天收….

@anniewong-e2p 6 ай бұрын

許Sir好😀大家好😀😀😀

@jefftsing2985 6 ай бұрын

✨️🎊芒友早晨，大家好🦋🦋

@benkeung2242 6 ай бұрын

👍

@scarletchow7172 6 ай бұрын

如果當時陳老是全職攝影記者，相片版權是屬於報社的

@fsyi8395 6 ай бұрын

遲早要還

@koKimmy9698 6 ай бұрын

非常討厭這種人。

@josephinemok8612 6 ай бұрын

Happy Tuesday ❤

@nbaactionhk 6 ай бұрын

正一賊仔行為

@fannymak108 6 ай бұрын

越有越貪

@abmom6799 6 ай бұрын

正PK，流細良個WIKI都係寫"專業騙子"

@一切都有回力作用 6 ай бұрын

流細涼呢啲福佳都係留番天收佢，而家仲可以係加拿大阿支阿左，佢以卑劣手法賺番嚟嘅錢，自會有人以惡劣手法攞番你的，加拿大治安咁差，小心惡人自有惡人磨啊！😡😡😡

@tamtam6244 6 ай бұрын

I9當年,很多同黄的關係,已經發達往英美,安居樂業了,關人了!

@wahhingip664 6 ай бұрын

佢都要當面同橋叔交代。

@swongcandy2185 6 ай бұрын

❤❤❤❤

@siulunlau7688 6 ай бұрын

係邪教信徒，好難救的。

@Momo-s9b 6 ай бұрын

咁做好無恥！

@一葉輕舟-e2s 6 ай бұрын

陳嘅女兒可以認識晒佢父親嘅所有朋友？？？包括佢哋講嗰啲乜嘢，其實用過扭諗吓都知好耐人尋味？陳女嘅動機係乜嘢？佢唔知唔等於冇發生過

@ChingWong-b9w 6 ай бұрын

良粉收皮啦，劉係偽黃！而家有藉口俾紅媒唱，開心啦！劉唔犯法唔得咩？

@cici3159 6 ай бұрын

有借有還，劉某借了人家有畢生心血啲USB，請儘快還給陳橋家人，謝謝

@amylamcf52 5 ай бұрын

佢起碼帶咗1.2億去加拿大，北角住宅加尚書房9千萬+ 另外收租物業

@xiaxxx6282 6 ай бұрын

呢D事, 黃C們九唔九都會爆一單 🤣

@ChingWong-b9w 6 ай бұрын

壞人周圍都有！

@wendyly12356 6 ай бұрын

似熟賣熟😞

@loyinching1529 6 ай бұрын

🖐🖐

@ARTCNKwan-gj8jh 6 ай бұрын

賣北角半山层樓，賺咗四仟八佰萬! 姓L條七頭重成日在綱上話窮，叫fans課金!🤭😆

@FreemanLee-o7n 6 ай бұрын

From a strict legal point of view, Sai Leung did nothing wrong by publishing the book. The copyright of the photos belongs to the SCMP. Sai Leung was authorized by the SCMP to publish the photos. There is no copyright infringement here. The SCMP could have published the book on its own without Mr. Chan's consent because SCMP is the copyright holder. Critics alleged that Sai Leung failed to obtain Mr. Chan's consent to publish the book. Sai Leung said he did by way of Mr. Chan's oral representation. We don't know whether he did or did not. Even if he did not, he was not required to because Mr. Chan was not the copyright holder. Critics also allege that Mr. Chan was "upset" by the publication of the book because the book was published without his input. We don't know Mr. Chan's true feelings toward the book. Did Mr. Chan issue any statement protesting against the publication of the book? If he did not, how do we know that he objected to the book? All we have is a statement from Mr. Chan’s daughter, which is hearsay by the way. One commentator justified Mr. Chan's inaction by saying that that was because Mr. Chan wanted to give "face" to Sai Leung and because Chinese people don't want to air dirty public laundry in pubic. I am sorry. But wanting to give someone "face" does not excuse a person from failing to exercise his legal right. Neither do cultural stereotypes about Chinese people's behavior. The fact about Mr. Chan's failure to take action coupled with the fact that he did put his autographs on some copies of the book could constitute an implicit endorsement of the book, which is a point Sai Leung should take note of should this case come to litigation. From a Chinese cultural point of view, it may be said that Sai Leung failed to show enough respect to a veteran photojournalist like Mr. Chan. This point may or may not be valid. The problem is that it is hard to measure "respect" by any objective standard. Even if this point is valid, it does not constitute an infringement of a legal right. Failing to show enough respect is not the same as intentionally depriving someone of his legal right. They are two entirely different matters. Unfortunately, many commentators have confused the two. Also, many interpretations about Chinese culture concerning respect are highly subjective, nothing more than cultural stereotypes. Innuendos and cultural stereotypes about what Chinese people would or would not do never stand up in a court of law. Also, how much importance should we attach to cultural sensitivity when Mr. Chan was a long-term Canadian resident, living in a country placing a premium on the rule of law? Had Mr. Chan felt that his right was infringed upon, he should have taken action to protect his right. The book was published in 2017. Mr. Chan had 7 years to take action before he passed away in 2024. If he did not take action during the 7-year interval, we can assume that right infringement did not happen. There is a good case to argue that Mr. Chan's family is now barred from making any claim against Sai Leung. I commend Sai Leung for his efforts in preserving Hong Kong's historical record. I don't think he has any ulterior motive of profiteering. This case has been blown way out of proportion. To me, preserving Hong Kong's historical record is more important than protecting the sensitivity of the personal feelings of some people. If personal feelings are all that matter, then museums all over the world should return all Chinese artifacts to China because they, too, hurt the feelings of the Chinese people.

@fannymak108 6 ай бұрын

教人点尊重以上💔😡睇到以上個心好噏向萬人景仰的橋叔致敬望有賢人替橋叔的作品再出書，一定有好多人搶住買，爱橋叔，欣賞他對香港的奉獻，需然一切來得太遲，未能在他生前表白。我們好多人了解得太遲，遺憾，我們極需要重温香港的点滴，當然可以安排有部份收益俾他的家人。我們绝對不認同她們是貪錢。希望橋叔存下有知，能解開他心中多年來的心结，及有一個有❤️的人替他寫🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️

@ChingWong-b9w 6 ай бұрын

劉影衰黃絲！

@Toni-j3e 6 ай бұрын

處心積慮，其心可誅。

@ChingWong-b9w 6 ай бұрын

見你講劉細良，破例入來聽，真小人好過假君子！

@bentonlibentonli 6 ай бұрын

Bentonli 🙋💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻👏👏👏🤭🤭🤭🤭👍🙏

@SauJook 6 ай бұрын

呢兩公婆就係中產版本嘅鳩達夫婦，就係冇咁粗鄙，但都係撈出版。

@wonged305 6 ай бұрын

芒果+涼粉+西米露正好消暑涼品正呀！

@puipuiwong4942 6 ай бұрын

抹黑為咗揾食啫！😂😂😂😂😂

@ChingWong-b9w 6 ай бұрын

劉抹黑黃絲

@Krush0-0 6 ай бұрын

點解唔開樣講呢？

@maleong3844 6 ай бұрын

用吓🧠

@sunnyngwahsun 6 ай бұрын

聽你講真係得啖笑

@kcalb3180 6 ай бұрын

我兩次直播都有睇, 件事好似唔係你講到咁斷章取義, 我作爲中立觀衆, 首先我唔係好明白喬叔在生就好地地, 一走就即刻有人講啦, 但係究竟講咩呢? 據我所見, 本來爲咩社團什麽賀壽大籌款係第一版已經完成左, 當時各方都冇唔開心架, 而家個問題, 係咪指佢(細良)私下加印賺錢呢? 如果係, 點解2017年就知道既事, 原來喬叔一路都好委屈但係又唔敢出聲怕KOL會加害佢, 咁講真, 一本低清黑白菲林相冊, 賣$300加幣又真係幾能過分, 免費送可能會有人要, 比錢買就認真唔環保, 去列治文揼個邪骨加埋貼仕都係$140, 你本野賣$300, 香港暴動又唔係D咩大新聞, 我覺得如果喬叔如果唔高興, 要做野17年就做左啦, 洗能等到今時今日要個女出來爭取公道咩, 如果係我老豆, 第一時間就同佢老豆D讀者講唔中意就唔好買, 反正D相都全部digitalize啦, 既然你係想幫你老豆爭取, 你都可以有樣學樣自己印自己賣, 你唔洗理細良架, 係咪?

@kittytsui8387 6 ай бұрын

上一代嘅文化人好有文人風骨同氣節，謙謙互讓互禮，呢一代嘅人首先計嘅係有冇蝕章又點能理喻到？或者感覺佢哋係戇居添！法律層面嘅贏咗贏晒並不等同做法係啱係正路！做人尤其成年人最起碼要堅守嘅係道德底線！

@kcalb3180 6 ай бұрын

@@kittytsui8387 唔單止係咁, 係......香港就係咁樣沒落, 唔知幾時開始, 一個二個完全唔管事, 但係又互相認識既人, 因爲發現對方一D鼻屎咁大既事情即刻就一副小人得志咁既口吻而得對方快D死咁, 我甚至覺得佢地交朋友好似係想識多個敵人同自己做鬥爭咁架, 明明件事就唔關自己事, 自動企係道德高地上面發表意見...是非只為時勢, 公道不在人心

@ChingWong-b9w 6 ай бұрын

USB係劉細良度，點印！

@kittytsui8387 6 ай бұрын

以前嘅香港獨特又令人迷戀嘅地方係香港基本上一向都冇民主！但有好大好闊嘅自由度，能任何思維/行為都可容納，大前題係因循司法……所以能容納不同聲音，批評，芝麻鼻屎細事都係事情，任何人唔喜歡都可出聲批評！互相間亦能尊重/接納辯論/辯駁/駁咀，兼容社會就係咁!大家都平等！平等/自由感覺真好！!！今日一切隨强左風而逝嚕!

@teamilk199 6 ай бұрын

細朗粉咬先真

@CK-nu7ej 6 ай бұрын

死咗先講她居心何在？

@fannymak108 6 ай бұрын

咁，你的❤何在？

@williamkeung5956 6 ай бұрын

不招人忌是庸才，其實劉細良係咩人，人品係點，有冇誠信，關我呢啲聽眾乜事？而家搵老公定搵生意partner?乜大家聽網台係要搵「聖人」嚟聽？係嘅話我不如聽耶穌或者聽習《近平的治國理政》好過啦。無論劉被講到點仆街都好，佢對世界政局嘅分析係無出其右，我敢講廣東話時事評論界，佢嘅分析係最精闢獨到（尤其係《三不管》呢個節目），沒有之一，係啲片有啲長，因為佢真係分析到非常深入，有晒例子，同埋睇得出每一集都做足準備，絕對唔係Hea做或錄條廿零分鐘嘅片就算，製作非常認真（長期一個禮拜做足七日兼日日托塔咁早開live個幾鐘，又有幾多KOL做得到？），有冇料聽過就知。唔想比較，細良同沈旭暉、傑斯、桑普、燒山、吳志森、陶傑、趙博⋯⋯等等等等都係我會聽嘅網台，好唔鍾意任何一位攞呢啲花生嚟抄作，共產黨最鍾意就係人民鬥人民，8964之後嘅海外民運人士已經係咁，咁樣自己人打自己人真係好冇意思，好失望，講完😡

@florali8012 6 ай бұрын

因為支針冇拮到你呀嘛

@fannymak108 6 ай бұрын

你講完兼玩完，冇❤亦冇(老）

@SauJook 6 ай бұрын

劉細良嗰啲叫分析？咪笑死人啦，好多好基礎嘅常識佢都成日講錯。😂😂😂

@williamkeung5956 6 ай бұрын

@@SauJook 基本上香港各個出名嘅時事評論KOL我都有聽10年八年，邊個分析最獨到自然識分，基本上每一個都會有口誤或者小錯，佢仲要下下live節目，唔會要求100%冇錯，就呢次事件所有將呢件事當連續劇咁日日重複重複咁做嘅KOL都係收視遠比城寨小嘅評論員，呢個係事實，背後咩原因我唔想猜測；當然公平啲講如果自己冇做錯事冇嘢唔見得光嘅話唔會有今日呢個地步，一件事還一件事，我都覺得係應該出嚟承認，當然我知道對佢嚟講可能好難

@SauJook 6 ай бұрын

@@williamkeung5956 所以唔係淨係劉細良嘅問題，而係香港呢班論政KOL已經脫晒節，睇下B站嘅知識區up主係點做節目啦，人哋係寫好稿先至錄，成集節目係有剪接有字幕，引用資料就會將文獻嘅書影剪埋落去，噉樣嘅製作模式就冇咁易將唔做功課或者誤導觀眾賴落去口誤度。睇下劉細良講中國四大發明嗰集啦，根本就唔係口誤，而係亂吹一通。佢講中國四大發明都係抄返嚟佢啲教徒會聽得好過癮，但話西方槍械用黃色“火藥”裝填就真係冇常識，黑火藥一直去到19世紀末都係槍彈裝填藥，現代槍械用嘅係無煙火藥，而黃色炸藥係用嚟爆破嘅。呢啲噉嘅知識儲備，喺大陸就係營銷號噉嘅水平，係香港呢班人先會變咗KOL。