Life Of A Ultra High Stakes Super Pro

[@2CardConfidence]

Learn how to use solvers correctly - avoid drawing wrong conclusions and crush your games instead: ► www.2cardconfidence.com/solver-mastery

[@seemslegit8858]

Guy just told me a guy who plays ULTRA HIGH STAKES for a living and he just calls the BB raise on SB with QT suited.. NICE JOKE

[@chewsday5919]

Easily #1 Poker channel atm

[@2CardConfidence]

❤️️

[@lukamiha7485]

great explanation my good man, I can not see checking back only because so few queens beat us and many weaker hands call us, people fail to realize 4bet pots are not srp and no sane player would have a raggedy queen there like QJo or QTo so a clear value jam, just stumbled upon you great content bro keep it up

[@GregGoesAllIn]

Don't tell anybody, but I quite like this channel.

[@2CardConfidence]

Nice - don't worry, it can be our little secret.

[@Trexguy1717]

i found greg

[@OHZORA-sr6gq]

Your edit is always amazing keep going!!!

[@yourboyisd0p3]

Many "winning" poker players in the comments, no worries guys, luck is not on your side, you will eventually make money by playing poker(not). No need to use solvers at you 1/3 games. Stay low and unskilled.

[@Imokay304]

High stakes is no better. It's definitely worse. Poker is not a way to gain money 💀 copium.

[@marvellkanmomixa1997]

@@Imokay304how is poker not a way to make money lmao. If the rake is beatable and the pool soft any half decent player can make a nice buck? Curious on your reasoning

[@Imokay304]

@@marvellkanmomixa1997 I'm talking long run. Sure who hasn't made money in a poker session but All the so called "pros" are only pros cause they can afford to play all the high stuff all the time and can easily afford to lose. They're all rich. They show their winnings on website but never how much they put into it all-time. Cause if they do that there down millions 😭😂it's just facts

[@DJM3KS]

@@Imokay304I’ve been a constant winner online since 2007. I think you’re the one coping because you can’t 😂

[@Imokay304]

@@DJM3KS this is not a place for liars. since people are too smooth in the head to understand what I was trying to say, my og comment just means you will definitely be putting in way more than taking it out in the long run and thats just a fact of life. Its poker, you can do everything right and still lose. All poker pros are highly negative by as much as millions of dollars (all time) and the only reason they can keep playing high stakes is because they are rich already. again cope harder. its just a fact of life. Not a way to make any income in the long run. thats all. and im guessing you're not above a poker pro so you are definitely down in the long run. I never meant to say you cant have winning sessions and win loads but people took it in that way. amazing.

[@liq-]

How did you even get hands like JTo, QTo, T7s, J8s and so in cold 4bet range??

[@lewiscpowell]

Got to be careful with using GTO wizard for low frequency lines i.e. calling a 3b with 97s. It makes certain nodes be like 0.1 combos which makes solver always bluff these seven high, eight high, nine high hands because its the tiniest fraction of its range. Like 0.1 combos out of say 150 combos.

[@2CardConfidence]

Hey, yeah I added 97s manually to be included at higher frequency getting to the flop. But for turn and river that is a good point as frequencies are very low after the flop check back

[@chadington382]

@lewiscpowell how did you solve this problem? Or you started using another solver? Is this an issue with the ai version too?

[@dominikborno4133]

​@@chadington382would also love to know this, cause certain variations are simply not available cause they deem it unnecessary

[@chadington382]

@dominikborno4133 the more I use gtowizard the less I like it and think it gives weird nonsense results in some spots. Pio solver might be slower but it's easily better for correct solutions imo.

[@dopamineflexin6962]

1:08 that's a 4bet Thank you, your analyzing style is clearly well-honed and easy to understand as well as entertaining. Looking forward to more of your work.

[@MrDizew]

That's 3-bet, mate. It's as straddle game, so CO is first to raise(2Bet)

[@dopamineflexin6962]

@@MrDizew Thank you for the correction

[@worthitt1291]

hey after just finding your channel, very impressed. will check at your course soon hopefully :). My one thought in regard to KK hand --- it has AQ just calling preflop (not 3betting) with 5 of 16 combos (2.5 suited and 2.5 offsuited). Leaving 11 total combos for BB that its 3betting. When it faces the 4bet, its always calling the suited combos (1.5 combos) and calling offsuited at discounted frequency (6.26 combos total, [as its folding aqo offsuit combos to 4b 34% which you skipped over]. So basically bb here gets postflop with 7.8 of total 16 aq combos. KQs calls pf open only 25% of time, and 3b/calls 4b 100%, so thats 3 combos of that. You block one as well. so 2 combos total. So looking at 9.8 total combos of Qx on the flop with inputs we are using (if rough math is correct). Makes sense on river when they only have 3 total better combos with so much Qx raising you on both flop and turn possibly. But if we add a lot more Qx to their range preflop, maybe all of combos of KQs/AQs/AQo. kk-aa will start becoming a xb on river? thanks for interesting hand and good analysis by the way.

[@2CardConfidence]

Hey, thank you for the nice words :) You're right, if the total amount of Qx that he gets to the flop with and/or that he slowplays flop and turn increases, then thin value bets become less profitable and eventually end up being check backs. But the other side is also possible - if he fast plays more Qx, preflop and/or on flop & turn, then thin value shoves become even more profitable OTR. So if you don't know which side your opponent (or the population your playing in) tends to side towards, falling back on GTO makes sense.

[@hydro8720]

I have a question, how do people learn solver theory etc, isn't there too many flop combinations etc? Do people literally just memorize all the possible card combinations on the board or are there some principles that I'm unaware of

[@kitbillion7783]

It's called bucketing. You basicly put similar spots into the same 'bucket'. Meaning a flop strategy on A82r is similar to the flop strategy on A72r. Other than that it's Just a ton of work and time you have to put into studying if you wanna succeed. There is so many people in local casinos or small stakes games who studyed actively for 200h or less and think that they're great. It's like any profession, you need time and dedication

[@kitbillion7783]

It's also way more efficient to learn solver concepts than actual solver outputs for specific spots

[@2CardConfidence]

Yep, what kit says, what you want to do is find out why things are happening in a spot. If you search for the reasons behind the outputs, you can apply them to other spots and don't have to memorize every one (which is indeed impossible for almost everyone)

[@hydro8720]

Aaa alright thanks a lot

[@jakobyuksel7420]

Currently grinding 10NL. Still absolutely love your content.

[@jimmyballs5662]

I don’t think I would bother. It’s probably detrimental for your actual game

[@2CardConfidence]

Thanks man, happy you like it!

[@2CardConfidence]

@@jimmyballs5662 If you simply copy what you see then that might be true. What I'm hoping to convey is that the reasoning behind the plays can be applied at any level

[@jimmyballs5662]

@@2CardConfidence yes I understand that, but I don’t typically think 10NL players are capable of applying concepts and understanding which variables lead to them misapplying concepts or strategies. It was a big set back for me Personally when I was at that level

[@highlyblessed87]

​@jimmyballs5662 What limit would you suggest to start grinding and trying to build a bankroll?

[@gmatsue84]

My question is if the solver says KK jams because it's profitable but reality shows it too

[@carlobasurto3176]

good explanations, solid channel!

[@naga3070]

Applying solver to a guy with 46% vpip . That is an entirely different style of poker that does find quite the success, especially against solvers. And the entire explanation regarding this hand couldnt be more wrong 3:30 . Literally any pocket pair and very infrequently, sometimes even ace high will call here, cause that shove can be anything from A7 to J10. And that is why he shoves KK here, and probably would shove JJ as well.

[@mateuszbak8501]

shoving KK on a QQ board versus someone who called your 4bet is the dumbest thing ive ever seen gto be damned lmao

[@naga3070]

@@mateuszbak8501 If you are aware how light someone raises, your range changes drastically. And that Latvian dude realized it and makes use of it in the best fashion possible. That was a good shove.

[@mateuszbak8501]

@@naga3070 good shove according to solver yet still losses 200k. LOL

[@naga3070]

@@mateuszbak8501 its a good shove since he is someone who would shove trash too. And that is something you fail to understand.

[@razersedge2k974]

​@@mateuszbak8501That's almost as dumb as saying "calling all in preflop with aces is bad because you lost this hand to KK hitting a set". Please stop typing if you aren't capable of understanding even basic poker strategy. The hands that beat him are probably AQ and probably not much else considering this is a 4 bet pot. JJ, 10, 10, AK, and probably many other pairs are more likely than AQ in this spot and even if he loses this time you should still be making the correct play long term as that's all that matters

[@lafk-lottyenaforrokave4700]

Yes solver... GTO... but solver not includes many factors, it based on a generalized concept. Here we are on a tournament, players can be more tigth if they are no short stack, and Kevin was defenetly not a short stack, AQ and JJ was his bottom of his calling range, if we consider these factors like: KK bet, re-raise from UTG is very strong, the have a decent size of stack, so no pressure on them to be more agressive with eachother. But here in this situation even 99,1010,jj would very likely fold, A high hero call is very unlikely also on the river JAM. So what value bet you have left? Propably nothing. AQ,AA,QJ,KQ,88 meanwhile call you for sure. The problem is with solver, it considering combinations of card, but not considering the likelyhood of those combinations depending on the actions, players profile (as a big stack cheap leader it is unlikely to be on tilt and also opponent had a really good stack size, so why would he hang himslef with a middle strong pocket pair like 99,1010,jj???), tournament status, etc... so as the example shows, with SOLVER you can sometimes drain yourself on the toilet. I wonder actually how rich you are from poker, as you have this confidence to publish these analysis videos. Propably you already a millioner if you are this smart... or probably I just ironized haha.

[@atultanajimohite]

Could someone please explain the GTO action on the turn on the basis of the card suits? Whats the underlying mechanism?

[@Jonathan-gf4ub]

Hey 2CC, would you be able to release short deck ranges for GG rake at an affordable price 🙏

[@2CardConfidence]

Hey, sorry I don't have access to a short deck solver

[@NoLifeNova]

Did you recently upload a video comparing gtowizard, ai, pio and gto+ that was removed? Or am I hallucinating, I can't find it and I thought it was from you.

[@2CardConfidence]

You're not hallucinating :) That video has not been public though, it could only be seen with the link. I'll release a public version sometime this week though!

[@NoLifeNova]

Alright thanks a lot. @@2CardConfidence

[@alainrolak]

I really don't understand how you attribute your range PF, it seems very lose to me going as low as 54s etc... could you explain a bit how you build those ? Thanks for the nice work ! Cheers !

[@2CardConfidence]

These are just the GTO preflop ranges from GTO Wizard's pre-sets :)

[@gicagogu-g4s]

Hello mate. Does you GG ranges subscription on your site include also RNC 200 ranges?

[@2CardConfidence]

Hey, yes. The GGPoker 200 ranges are the same as all RnC ranges, because they all share the same rake structure (5% and 3bb cap)

[@kaaristotelancien3005]

despite solvers, people are still result oriented, pretty sick for them

[@Breezee92]

What is the solver program you use?

[@2CardConfidence]

In this video, it's GTO Wizard

[@noThankyou-g5c]

even at nosebleed stakes online would T8s _really_ call down though?

[@TomRauhe]

No. What he says there is GTO, not real life. You would almost never get called by worse. MAYBE a crying JJ.

[@Romans8-9]

@@TomRauhe JJ is never folding in a 4b pot on that board neither is TT.

[@TomRauhe]

@@Romans8-9 except that realistically, JJ is only ahead of AK and 10 10, so a check behind does seem somewhat reasonable

[@2CardConfidence]

T8s specifically might indeed not get here all that often. But you need to remember that if you just fold 78s/89s and 99-JJ here all the time, CO will print money with their bluffs. And these guys will find bluffs. At lower stakes that indeed will look a lot different.

[@TomRauhe]

@@2CardConfidence except that quite some of his calls and checks on flop, turn and river are slowplays

[@borg972]

Can you disclose how do you get those HH in video form?

[@2CardConfidence]

Check out the channel "bcp poker replays". Lots of videos there

[@borg972]

@@2CardConfidence Thanks! 🙏

[@andybredar8868]

Why do you say "as long as more than half" of hands @4:05 ... doesn't it depend on the bet size?

[@JacobSilverstein-hv6ty]

No because the money in the pot is always there, but if you get called more than half the time by hands you beat you also win money from their call

[@luckymaggie6594]

What is the discount code?

[@2CardConfidence]

There is no discount code

[@ImShawnFrost]

That intro was just way too good

[@griffin_kith6214]

holy shit I had no idea you could play levels this high online, that seems dangerous lol

[@jnapp1215]

Can you do a MC for small stakes please ? How to play very agressively 🚀

[@2CardConfidence]

Will consider what's possible, thanks for the suggestion!

[@jnapp1215]

@@2CardConfidence 🎉will be great ! Thks

[@frkysience]

Legendary simple legendary content

[@PokerGiraffe]

Nice video! Your course sounds like a good deal too :)

[@2CardConfidence]

Thanks QY, means a lot!

[@Aploplex]

i love seeing those YT comments lol it’s always so predictable too i didn’t move up in stakes by being a nit 😂

[@enlightenmentseeker1689]

The thing I find strange is if we are jamming AA/KK/88+Qx and AKs then why would our opponent ever call any hand that isnt Qx. I don't see the point in calling any pairs or 8x when hero has 4 bluff combos. You could just over fold this spot as hero is so value heavy.

[@2CardConfidence]

Don't forget pot odds. He's getting ~1:3.5 on his call, so only needs to win ~28% of the time

[@KoeCo4035]

I'd sleep better if I haven't shoved another 98k in the middle :D No srsly, Calling all streets and checking on the river is just a free showdown for me. Slow played Aces are more unlikely than 88 or AQ. But that's just my theory. It can go either way. The villan has JJ or TT and c-calls or you are pretty much fkd by AQ or 88.

[@blakemcinnis8410]

Love the Spongebob edits

[@nickdealy6686]

also, could really use a discount code PLEASE

[@2CardConfidence]

Sorry, but there are no discount codes

[@Chino-bk9fd]

is this a cash game?

[@frkysience]

Yes

[@belltonix3614]

The solver saying to check-raise a flopped full house is ridiculous.

[@hiwhatsup708]

This videos so good

[@antihackerify]

had a 40 bi'ns downswing at nl200 and feeling like idk how to play poker anymore, imagine having a 40 bi'ns downswing at nl100k?, and the thing is, these guys for sure doesnt have more than 200 bi'ns of their limit, i dont think i could ever do it...

[@olhaogajo]

Just save a lot of hours of your time, quit poker, it´s a rich people sport, hobby. Nik Airball.

[@2CardConfidence]

Exactly, and adding to that, is takes wayyy longer to even play that sample size on those stakes than on NL200

[@antihackerify]

@@olhaogajo i play professionally for many year, also, on the country i live, i basically could never make the ammount i make on poker working on other things

[@anthonyromerobazalar1548]

​@@antihackerifybro, just pay a coach and find your leaks. 40bi downswing sounds more like a punt than Bad variance.

[@antihackerify]

@@anthonyromerobazalar1548 It was like this : i played nl100i think over 100k hands, with 3-4bb, then i tried changing the game, moved tô nl50 tô test things, went well, won 10bb/100 after 30k hands, then played nl100 15bb/100 after 30-40k hands, then i started playing nl200, went slitly up-/BE for like over 100k hands, then this 40bins downswing happened, both at nl200 and 100, and i didnt change anything at the game, so, i dont think i need "a coach", also, i think coach is Just a Bad player who cant beat the game and sell courses.

[@LuftpolsterManu]

awesome video. fun and informativ. thats how youtube should be :)

[@feelme5297]

Fuck what the solvers say, going all in is not the right move in that situation. You’re only getting called with better hands in that situation. Solvers take into account probability which is important but there are better ways to play that hand. Going all in because there is a slightly better probability you have a better hand is dumb. I wish I was the guy holding ace queen, he knew there wasn’t a better hand that was beating him there.

[@tenaciousx00]

track title at the beginning? LOL

[@2CardConfidence]

It's called Renegade by STRLGHT

[@tenaciousx00]

@@2CardConfidence thx XD

[@LimitlessVibrations]

KK was a bad jam Only better hands call. Id check it back easily. Doesnt take einsten to know that

[@nickdealy6686]

I'm trying to login/make an account for the site. I am highly considering purchasing the course, as this is exactly what I need. I love ur videos/content, so I believe that this is not only a must-have, but also very valuable for myself/my poker study-SOLVER WORK. can you get back to me soon??

[@2CardConfidence]

Hey, love to hear it! Can you let me know what is the problem with making an account? You can also contact me at [e-mail] or at 2cardconfidence on discord

[@nickdealy6686]

@2CardConfidence Hey, thanks for the quick response. I got in with a password reset. I will add to Discord right now, & message u on there.

[@nickdealy6686]

@2CardConfidence If not today, then tomorrow I'll be getting the course. I asked for code because I'm in Grad School, so $$ is somewhat tight. I've got homework 🙃 & about 2 start a PKO on ACR-OSS series, so that's why I'm probably waiting til tomorrow...I understand because I know the pricing layout of something similar if offered by others & appreciate the value!

[@AlotofStuffChannel]

You try to school this players ? Why don’t you battle them then ?

[@ckarea55]

This is wrong use of gto to justify the action. Human doesn't play like computer, even pro overfold and underbluff in alot of lines. Even worse is the river in gto deviate the most from reality, one tiny miscalculation on preflop ranges makes a huge difference in gto river.

[@Ze.NiTH_]

Yes!!! Finally :)

[@SystemExclusive]

These animations midhand are very annoying imo

[@abbeybon]

An Ultra? 😜👌

[@bcpoff]

🔥🔥🔥

[@2CardConfidence]

goat 🔥

[@Carriby]

Yeees finally! Less goo :))

[@wydellbirchwood9146]

sorry but then KK shove on the river only gets called by queens there... maybe JJ or 1010 calls but nobody is donking off 200k with ace king or less

[@lew115]

How depressing.

[@fabianram9702]

Its not a pro it just a rick kid

[@sands291]

Make money by losing $200k 😂😂

[@dezao2421]

Lol... Solvers...

[@Nordling89]

Checked the river? With 3rd nuts and that SPR? Both you and that "solver" gotta be on drugs. Even remotely referencing something so ridiculous, given the stack sizes and how the hand played out can just delete channel straight for humanity's sake. It's absolutely irrelevant what we're blocking on the river, the only issue is the sizing. If we hold AK in a 4bet pot on a KK753 and opponent has 20bb with a 140bb pot we also checking cause we're "blocking" both AA and KQs?

[@Franciscasieri]

yes...

[@luismatosoliveira4117]

ALL online poker is a scam so good advices for real (life) poker but uselless for the (scam) online poker.

[@whereismymind1]

dude, sorry if faulty uninformed logic. i will apologize here ez. 400 bucks seems to me a bit much. i assume its your first course like this. only thing i have in me mind, carrot has one 10hr grade for less. my hunch is, experience sells and you are asking for first course ever legendary price.

[@2CardConfidence]

Hey, thanks for your feedback, appreciate it! You're right, if you're looking for the cheapest course - this one isn't for you. If you're looking for the longest watch time and to learn something over a longer time period - this is also not for you. This course is made with a specific purpose: teaching you how to work with solvers effectively. And to do so in the most effective and time efficient way, so that you can enjoy the benefits as quickly as possible. It's also not my first course, just the first that is sold on my site. And if the content from all the videos on this channels doesn't convince you the course will contain the most valuable information you can get in that time span - then this course is definitely not for you :)

[@Franciscasieri]

you entire analysis assumes the villian's 3bet pre is 33% less likely than a call AND that IF he made that call (then he most likely has JJ, 1010 99 98S 108S the worse hands that would call a shove) and then the actual subsequent calls on flop and turn (25% and 30% pot) the shove is GTO...AND HE LOST 250K...sigh.

[@maxbarnes3967]

fake

[@Henry94863]

Stop making hand analysis with sims that use different 3bet sizings ike at 1:12. And a bunch of spots you just pick the size nearest to what occurred. It completely changes later streets in marginal spots