Spoiler free review of book 3 in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy series - Life, the Universe and Everything by Douglas Adams Goodreads: / neville-ridley-smith #scifi #booktube
Пікірлер: 23
@richardbrenton89835 ай бұрын
Oh no, not again. The radio plays were wonderful. I even got to wear my dressing gown and towel to my local theatre for the radio play tour a few years back. I can't read the books without hearing their voices from the radio. You're spot on with the analysis here :)
@NevsBookChannel5 ай бұрын
Thanks Richard!
@TheRedPolyhedral5 ай бұрын
Listening to the radio plays is good advice, but don't just listen to a few. Listen to all of them. Repeatedly. Oh, and Nev? He's just this guy, you know?
@NevsBookChannel5 ай бұрын
Thank you Gag Halfrunt!
@PaperlessWriter18 күн бұрын
Have you played the Infocom text adventure of Hitchhiker's? Would love to see a video of your thoughts on that bonkers game. I like your channel; keep up the good work:)
@NevsBookChannel18 күн бұрын
Thanks! Yeah, I played the game on my Apple IIc back in the day! Seem to remember getting stuck on the boat with Zaphod or something. Would love to do a video on that! Perhaps when I’ve finished all the book material
@DutchGreyBeard5 ай бұрын
LOL LOL!!! Timing is everything!! Thanks Nev for another great explanatory video. I am one of those who don't know the radio plays, and absolutely did not like this book. Too late for me, now. I'm buried in other reads. By the way, great graphics!!
@NevsBookChannel5 ай бұрын
Thanks Ed!
@IFStravinsky5 ай бұрын
Just finished reading the whole series, and I didn't find it as amusing as I had been led to believe I would. The only one I really liked was the last one, So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish, which turned out to be a love story. And Arthur wasn't the lump he was in the first three books. Never heard the radio plays.
@NevsBookChannel5 ай бұрын
Did you read And another thing?
@nick_john5 ай бұрын
If you look at the the whole trilogy as a work of satire, it’s not exactly a slapper. But it’s got lots of funny little hooks that stay with you. To this day, for example, I simply can’t read or watch a video about the hugeness of the universe without running to the fridge for a piece of fairy cake.
@NevsBookChannel5 ай бұрын
Love it!
@taker685 ай бұрын
The Radio series is where I first heard THHGTTG and I loved it. Got the album versions and saw the 80s TV series. Got the first 2 books, the third comes out without any adaptation (wouldn't be for a long time) and it did feel flat to me. It's not bad but it doesn't have the feeling of the various other versions of the first 2. Same goes for the 4th and 5th books. Has the absurdity just not the fun of the early stuff. The eventual radio (?) version helped make those 3 books better for me. I've heard this book is a reworking of a rejected Dr. Who script.
@NevsBookChannel5 ай бұрын
Ah yes, I read that somewhere as well about the Dr Who thing. And to my chagrin, I haven’t listened to the series 3 adaptation!
@Scruffy-LookinTerfHerder5 ай бұрын
This is an interesting theory for me personally because I listened to the first book and really liked it but I read the second, liked it but not as much, and read the third and did not even finish it cause it did not really come together in a meaningful way for me. I'll have to try listening to the corresponding radio play and see if that changes things for me.
@NevsBookChannel5 ай бұрын
Would love to know if it does!
@jeremysmetana85835 ай бұрын
Your thumbnail asked whether this work is actually funny. Very fair question. Douglas Adams is rarely, RARELY laugh-out-loud funny. I've always felt like most folks who claim his work is hilarious are forcing the issue because they feel they are expected to, given the high brow class of nerds his work attracts and the snooty reaction one encounters if we cannot roll out six or seven quotes from his work in quick time. Douglas Adams' work is funny in a sort of mild, atmospheric way. He sustains a good sense of the absurd throughout. But he's not really funny in the colloquial sense of that word. He is insightful (mostly) witty (though his wit is sometimes perfunctory and obvious). His work is an enjoyable read, though I find it tedious at times. He tries too hard, on occasion.
@NevsBookChannel5 ай бұрын
That’s a fair analysis
@jrpipik5 ай бұрын
Yes, it's funny. Very funny.
@cruxofthecookie5 ай бұрын
I love the book, and have never listened to any of the radio series ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@NevsBookChannel5 ай бұрын
This is a valid outcome!
@rogerbourke55705 ай бұрын
I was at the same college at Cambridge just after Douglas. The word was he was an arse-bandit (queer).