Link Whisper Review - How To Build Automatic Internal Links With This Seo Plugin

[@modern-gamer]

As someone who has both Linksy and link whisperer, it's definitely no contest currently but I am patiently waiting for Linksy to catch up. That team seems motivated to make it a real contender. At the moment though, link whisperer is much better

[@writersalike]

Tested Linksy lately and Link Whisper is no contender. I was watching a video about their Automation Turbo just released and this video suggested. You should check it it.

[@shinjiniray8577]

Your explanation is great Enjoyable vedio. Thanks for this

[@modestlifestyle1674]

Your video content always good and informative. The way of explain very good and easy to understand. Thank you for sharing.

[@sujetphilips7356]

This video is really awesome

[@ritapaul4815]

Great review..nice video 👍

[@TimParkerPro]

Link Whisper doesn't have a setting for sites built on silo structures? It must stay within the silo to the previous page and the next page plus back to the pillar page.

[@gumballdegree]

This is crazy. I'm not sure how people are using link whisper and how on earth it's getting so much praise but I found it to not give good suggestions. Like one out of 10 maybe two out of 10 suggestions are decent. I don't feel like it's using any type of AI that works. It's always suggesting wrong things. I recently purchased linksy which has only slightly better suggestions but the UI seems to be way more intuitive than linked whisper. There's a lot of features in it that make it easier as well to select relevant links. You should definitely do a comparison or try making a video on linksy. I'm actually using it right now and it kind of gets the slight edge over link whisper

[@LearnWire]

Ok so thanks for offending me! I praised the tool! Just because it's not your cup of tea doesn't mean it's crap. Research and history over the years shows there are no other reliable capable internal links tools. No tool of this kind is perfect. But using it is better than not doing any internal links at all.

[@nolow_life]

What do you like most about Linksy?

[@gumballdegree]

@@LearnWire sorry didn't really mean to offend you at all really, I still haven't had time to watch the entire video though but I will later. I'm just more frustrated at the fact that this app hasn't done well for me personally. I wasn't trying to offend you or anything. I think there could be a number of factors why it hasn't worked for me... It could be that maybe I'm not using it right? Or it could be that all my articles have no correlation lol

[@gumballdegree]

@@nolow_life like I said, it's not perfect but it's slightly takes the edge over link whisper. There's this really cool feature where it gives you a score of how relevant the links are that it suggesting from 0 to 100. It makes it easy when you're sorting it. I found that every score of 90 or above is more or less a pretty relevant suggestion. It's not perfect either though. What I realized is that these tools aren't really using real real AI but more or less kind of like their own algorithm. We're not talking about open AI or chatGPT here it seems but who knows, maybe one day they will release an update for such.

[@LearnWire]

@@gumballdegree all good dude!

[@zebasoniya7976]

Very nice video

[@nolow_life]

Your thoughts on Linksy (the one you mentioned on AS) vs this?

[@alamiyo]

The best internal link-building tool without any doubt. I am unlucky that I couldn't buy it when it was available on an LTD deal.

[@LearnWire]

True! I have missed so many amazing LTD's.

[@gumballdegree]

I got the LTD. It was a yearly subscription LTD. Which was basically a lifetime discount.

[@pujasen5637]

Very informative and helpful video. Thanks for sharing.

[@smritikonabera4547]

Very nice

[@taral927]

Do you know if the links are still valid after you unsubscribe? I heard somewhere links don't work once you stop paying. This was one of the drawbacks of Linkwhisper someone pointed out. I may have misheard.

[@LizaAntony]

Nice

[@pablorey9203]

Disclaimer: never used linkwhisper or similar tool, I am not good at English, so I may have missed something. When you find an orphan page (a new one, as an example) you have 2 things to do. Add links from this page and to this page. So, the orphan page is just half of the problem, you need to know the pages that do not have “sons” (if there is an English word for that, I don't know it). To be clear, let's say you have n pages. You can imagine it as a matrix, with the columns are the pages that are “giving” the links and rows represent the pages receiving them. So, you have n*n-n possible connections (we are subtracting the main diagonal because we don't want links that link to the same page that they belong). For the sake of simplicity, let's ignore the possibility of more than one link from page a to page b. Anyway, it could be a natural number, so not a big deal. Using that representation, you need to find both cases: columns and rows without links. So, orphan pages and “sonless” pages (I just invented it, but the orthography tool seems fine with it… Maybe it exists). But “orphan pages” is detecting just one. If you are just adding pages one by one, there is no problem, you create the links from this page (using LW, I guess). And then you have an orphan page, you can let LW scan your content to find links to that new page. But, if you add many pages (or install LW when you already have pages-when I say pages, y mean mostly posts-) you are not done just solving orphan pages... you still have half the work to be done.

[@LearnWire]

Thanks for your comment and watching. I think you need to think one level deeper on this. If you solve the inbound links issue, then ultimately all pages on your site will have links going to other pages. So generally speaking you only need to focus on one aspect inbound or outbound on a page and it eventually takes care of itself across the website.

[@pablorey9203]

@@LearnWire yes, of course, but you are only using one half (one triangle) of the matrix. The problem with that is that you are creating an unintended hierarchy... hell it is so hard to explain it in a language that you barely understand. Grrr Suppose you add the post A, it is orphan you fix it, now you have links to A. Now you add the post B, you fix it. You have all linked. But with this algorithm, you will never get B linking to A. So, when you add a new post, you should link it to the already published posts... that ii what it tried to say... I guess I failed. Or just missed something in your explanation... Do not interpret this as a criticism... please. Just trying to understand the best way to use LW (I mean LinkWisper, not LearnWire)

[@marclaclear6628]

That number probably isn't going down because you are posting to a schedule and it is adding them as you work.

[@LearnWire]

Damn straight son!!! You are correct but you thought of it first so you da man! Thanks for the insight!

[@manjuray6185]

Very informative and helpful video.thank you for sharing this video.