Importance of Uniform Civil Code in India | Apoorva Purohit | Linking Laws

[@JudiciaryUnacademy]

Click here to get free notes & pdfs: unacademy.onelink.me/RICs/rqvnzccj

[@RohitSharma-uz6od]

Yes plz proceed.

[@mukeshdevi2108]

Thnkx thnkx thnkx...Mem🙏🙏🙏

[@RuchiSharma-sq6oq]

Thanks a lot

[@prabhakaryadav6743]

U teach good

[@legal8029]

Mam, kindly bring a session on Delhi High court and Supreme Court judgments 2021..🙏🙏

[@fouziakhatoon7595]

In deniel latifi case -muslim women protection on divorce act 1986 was declared constitutional not unconstitutional .plz correct of the same

[@laxmigupta9987]

Yes. mam

[@Bhavikasingh-b2w]

Jaise app ne iss video m bataya h Wase he judiciary ke mains exam m lekhna parega mam 😳

[@KannadaDictionaryWithEnglish]

Why Uniform Civil Code is necessary? Wakf Act 1995, Has many draconian provisions, section 52 & 53 which can declare anyone has encroached & under these sections can order the person to leave with the help of DM SSP, Can that be done by Non Muslims? Do they have these privileges? There are limitations for Hindu deities to knock the doors of Court, it is having limitations with time, whereas WAKF board has no time limitations according to section 108, Is this not the violation of human rights & Equality in connection to various faiths? According to section 89 one has to send a notice to WAKF board before filing a case, it is just like parallel Government. Have you ever heard of sending notice to before filing a case? According to my knowledge it happens if a person is filing a case against Government. Section 4 & 5 WAKF Act, according to this there will be a survey of land that will be done on timely basis, whose expenses are to be bore by tax payers of India. 1991 worship Act, which is also non secular, In continuation, If there are any issues faced by Churches, Temples, Gurudwara it has register a complaint with Police, Whereas WAKF can order the police if there are any discrepancy according to the board & police has to abide by it. Is this true with your respective cases, introspect. WAKF Act, section 40 gives the power to the board in connection to declaration of any of the property as its own. Can a normal citizen do this? Here please correct me if I'm wrong with authentic sources. If there are legal issues faced by Non Muslims then they are suppose to fight in WAKF tribunal which is run by Sharia Kaanoon can they ever get Justice? I don't know, if true please enlighten me with the verdicts so given. So WAKF tribunal is an authority, hence in future if a person gets a verdict from it in favour of him/her & can challenge the opposing verdict given in the same case given by Supreme Court of India, till date it has not been done, but what is the guarantee that it is not done in future? Think. Keeping all these powers in hand, WAKF board is asking the petitioners of Mathura & Kaashi Temple that they should not fight it in Civil court but in Sharia Court A.K.A WAKF board. This is the outcome of the powers so given to the WAKF board. It also has provision of public servant in section 101. All these information so put here are according to the best of knowledge sources, anybody is free to correct me with authentic sources. Thanks..

[@aayush92110]

Ma'am class is not completely uploaded kindly resolve it thank you

[@Bhavikasingh-b2w]

Legal essay kitne marks ka aata h mam Or kitne page m approx lekhna parta h

[@MeghaJoshi-n3r]

Ye ppt milegi mam

[@asse715]

Mem aap pdate bhot acha ho lekin aap jab bolte hoto confuse kardete ho aap ne kha ke wapis is act ko sthapit kardiya deni latifi case sthapit kha kiya use to unconstitutional ghosit kardiya na

[@apoorvapurohit584]

"Right to Maintenance of Muslim Women ko wapas sthapit" kar dia in Latifi case,

[@mohdsameer-uc4ui]

To madam aapne kyo ek side ko pickup kar liya ....gyan to de diya ....argument in favour bhe bata dete

[@CLCian_We]

😁 Bakwas Jyada Teach kam karti he 😁